Kaizen : Techniques and Case studies

download Kaizen : Techniques and Case studies

of 29

description

We all are familiar with the Kaizen which is a Japanese innovation for organizational efficiency.This report/assignment focus on different aspects of Kaizen, Relation with HR and also explore it through some case studies t understand its effectivness

Transcript of Kaizen : Techniques and Case studies

  • 5/17/2013

    Human Resource Management, 2nd Sem. | Authored by : Shad Rahmani

    JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA KAIZEN

  • 2

    KAIZEN

    A Report on Kaizen

    Prepared for 1st Semester submission

    In

    Human Resource Management course

    Prepared By:

    Shad Rahmani

    Human Resource management

    2nd Semester (1st year)

    Department of Social work

    Jamia Millia Islamia

    Submitted to:

    Prof. Sigamani P

  • 3

    KAIZEN

    1

    Quality is both thinking why something is done and why it is done

    that way; then thinking differently to improve

    (Taiichi Ohno), Chairman of Toyota)2

    1 leanimprovement.blogspot.com

    2 Sharma.d.d(2000) Total quality management, Delhi sultanchand &sons

  • 4

    1:-Introduction

    We all are n familiar with the word KAIZEN after the visit to the

    different production plants in our scheduled organisation visits.

    First Thing which come in mind after seeing this word that it is a

    foreign terminology, and as we all know KAIZEN is a Japanese term

    meaning improvement or rather continuous improvement.

    Essence of kaizen is very straight and simple. It speaks of

    CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT. It is not just a business concept;

    it is a philosophy of way of life, our professional life, social life and

    personal life.

    Through this assignment we would try to find the Origin, definition,

    concept and framework of Kaizen.

    We would further delve into conceptual understanding of topic, its

    framework, different processes and implementation of the concept.

    We would then analyse topic critically through case studies and try to

    understand results achieved by application of kaizen.

  • 5

    2:-Theoretical background(s)

    2.1:- Origin

    Origin of Kaizen could be traced back to post world war

    (World War II) scenario in Japanese economy. At that time most of

    the Japanese companies were facing survival challenges and have to

    start from the basic. At that time Experts such as W.E Deming

    and M. Juran come into the leading front and introduced various

    tools that helped origin of this concept around 1950s and early 1960s.

    Kaizen was first implemented by Toyota in 1950 through quality

    circles which lead to the development of a concept called Toyota

    Production System

    It was a system of continuous improvement in quality, technology,

    processes, productivity, safety and leadership. It resulted in faster

    delivery, lower costs, and greater customer satisfaction.

    1986- Masaki Imai introduced this concept to the western world

    through his book KAIZEN: The key to Japans competitive

    success.

    With thirty years of experience in Kaizen, Japanese companies has

    flourished and set a benchmark for others.

  • 6

    2.2:-Definitions

    In term of a common person we could always define kaizen as a

    concept which seeks of continuous improvement. It is a very simple

    and elegant definition which gives idea about what you are striving

    for.

    It is really amazing that a concept which changes an organisation is so

    easy to describe in one sentence , In fact we could understand from

    this that kaizen itself speaks of simplifying things and works toward

    removal of complexity, thereby increasing productivity, performance

    and profit.

    Furthermore various researchers have explained Kaizen in various

    different ways. We would go through them and try to understand the

    concept.

    1-Neese and Kong (2007)3 described kaizen as the process of

    orderly continuous improvement

    2- Kaizens are characterized as short bursts of intense activity driven

    toward resolving a specific problem or achieving a specific company

    goal in a short period of time (Chapman, 2006, p.27)4

    3-Womack and Jones (1996)5 refers to Kaizen as Lean Thinking and

    lay out a systematic approach to help organizations systematically

    reduce waste.

    4-Kaizen Event is a focused and structured improvement project

    using a dedicated cross-functional team to improve a targeted work

    area, with specific goals in an accelerated time frame (Letens, Farris,

    and Van Aken, 2006)6

    3 Mishra,Gupta anshul2010,kaizen culture: enabling organizational change management,GJEIS,vol-2,p-4

    4 Mishra,Gupta anshul2010,kaizen culture: enabling organizational change management,GJEIS,vol-2,p-4

    5 Lee Samson et al,1999-2000,kaizen:an essential tool for inclusion in industrial technology criteria,JIT,vol-16,p-2

    6 Farris.A.Jennifer et al,2008,learning from less successful kaizen events-a case study,EMJ,vol-20,p-1

  • 7

    2.3:-Concept

    Kaizen as we all have seen from definitions speaks of four main

    elements

    Hence kaizen is a process that sees improvement in productivity as a

    gradual and methodical process.

    Kaizen extract profits and productivity by eliminating waste from

    overall processes

    Hence we could safely assume that Kaizen is an improvement which

    is

    Kaizen is not expensive. The core principal of kaizen is to make small

    and immediate improvements in process and standard of workplace. It

    uses common sense tools checklist and techniques that do not cost

    money. After a period of time all these processes would add up to-

    Goal Oriented

    Continuous Change Elimination

    Of waste

    Process

    Significant

    Stratigically important

    Duration

    Speedily

    Sustainaible

    Methods

    Scientific data

    Utilises Best Tools

    Elimination Of Waste processe

    Increased safety Increased Efficiency

    Increased Productivity

  • 8

    2.4- Main Features

    Till now we have learnt that kaizen is a goal oriented process which

    emphasise on goal orientation and increasing profit by eliminating

    waste processes. To implement kaizen we only need simple

    conventional Techniques such as seven tools of quality control.

    Here to understand main features of kaizen we would try to compare

    it with western concept of innovation to get clarity.

    S.no Features Kaizen Innovations

    1 Effect Long term Short term

    2 Pace Small Steps Big Steps

    3 Timeframe Continuous Intermittent

    4 Change Gradual and

    Constant

    Abrupt and Volatile

    5 Involvement Everybody Select few

    champions

    6 Approach Collectivism, Group

    Efforts

    Individualism

    7 Mode Maintenance and

    Improvement

    Scrap and Rebuild

    8 Practical

    Requirement

    Little Investment

    ,Little effort

    Large Investment,

    Little effort

    9 Effort Orientation People Technology

    10 Evaluation Criteria Process and efforts

    for better results

    Results for profits

    11 Advantage Works well in slow

    growth economy

    Better suited to fast

    growth economy 7

    7 Sharma.d.d(2000) Total quality management, Delhi sultanchand &sons

  • 9

    2.5-Framework

    Kaizen work through its five fundamental basic principles

    Which are-

    Steps in Kaizen

    8

    8 http://www.wcmfg.com

    Suggestion/feedback

    QualityCircles

    Improved Morale Self confidence Participation

    Personal Discipline Work Culture Commitment

    Team Work Group Effort Team Building

  • 10

    2.5:-Framework (contd.)

    We could understand the cycle of Kaizen through PDCA cycle.

    It was introduced by Deaming.It is also called Deaming Wheel or

    PDCA cycle and is one of the crucial quality Control tools for

    assuring continuous improvement

    9

    1-Plan and Design-PLAN Collection of Data, identification Of

    Problem, Planning for Improvement

    2-Implement-DoImpementation of Pilot Project

    3-Evaluate-CheckObservation and Analysis of Procedures and

    Results

    4-Assess/Reassess-Action Assessing results and then redeployment

    of the Improved Plan .From this stage cycle starts again.

    9 http://www.kaizentek.com

  • 11

    3:-Conceptual Understanding

    In this section now we will try to understand, what are different

    methods of implementation of Kaizen in an organisation and how

    different levels in an organisation interact and carry forward this

    Process.

    3.1:-Kaizen Umbrella

    In practice all the quality control methods such as TQC, QC,

    Zero Defect, JIT, Kanban etc come under one word i.e. Kaizen.

    Hence by philosophy all the Japanese quality improvement methods

    can be covered under concept of Kaizen.

    KAIZEN

    TQC

    Quality Circles

    SGAs

    ZD

    Suggestion System

    Kanban

  • 12

    3.2:-Kaizen Strategy

    1-Maintaining and improving working standards through small,

    gradual improvements

    2- Delineate responsibility for maintaining standards to workers, with

    role of management being the improvement of standards

    3- Produce a system approach and problem-solving tools that can help

    in realising the goals

    4-There should be everyday improvement being made somewhere in

    the company

    5- Maintaining quality should be highest priority; however this quality

    maintenance should not be limited to finished products. It should run

    through all activity such as design, production, management etc.

    6- Kaizen works for problem solving and for that gathering relevant

    data is very important

    7- Kaizen is process oriented rather than result oriented. In kaizen

    managers have to focus on Process and result should be process

    oriented.

    8- Elimination of waste and MUDA and realizing goals.

  • 13

    3.3-Kaizen and Management

    In Kaizen management has two functions as in following chart-

    Management must first establish policies, rules, directives and

    procedures for everyone and ensure that everyone follows it.

    Top management

    Middle

    Supervisors

    Workers

    (Japanese perceptions of Job Functions)

    Top Management

    Middle

    Supervisor

    Worker

    (Management functions in KAIZEN)

    Maintainance

    Maintaining current technological and

    operating standards

    Maintaining Managerial p[rocesses

    Improvement

    Improving current standards

    Improvement of Work practices

    Improvement

    Maintenance

    Innovation

    Kaizen

    Maintenance

  • 14

    3.4:-Kaizen Implementation at Different Levels

    Top

    Management

    Middle

    Management

    and Staff

    Supervisors Workers

    Having a

    Determination to

    introduce

    KAIZEN as a

    corporate strategy.

    Deploy and

    implement

    KAIZEN goals as

    directed by top

    management.

    Uses KAIZEN in

    functional roles.

    Engaging in

    KAIZEN through

    the suggestion

    system and SGAs

    Providing Support

    and Direction for

    KAIZEN by

    allocating

    resources.

    Using KAIZEN in

    functional

    capabilities.

    Formulating plans

    for KAIZEN and

    provides guidance

    to workers.

    Practicing

    discipline in the

    workshop.

    Framing Policy

    for KAIZEN and

    Goals.

    Establish,

    maintain and

    upgrade

    standards.

    Improving

    communication

    with workers and

    sustaining high

    morals.

    Engaging in

    continuous self

    development to

    become better

    problem solver.

    Deployment of

    Policies and

    audits to achieve

    environment of

    KAIZEN.

    Organising

    Training

    programmes to

    make employees

    KAIZEN

    conscious.

    Introducing

    discipline in the

    workshop.

    Enhancing skills

    and job-

    performance,

    expertise with

    cross-education.

    Building system,

    procedures and

    structures

    conducive to

    Kaizen.

    Help employees

    develop kills and

    tools for problem

    solving.

    Providing

    Suggestions for

    KAIZEN.

    10

    10

    Charantimath Poornima,(2003) total quality managementDelhi,Pearson education

  • 15

    3.5-Kaizen Practice

    Kaizen process can be divided into three segments depending upon

    complexity and level.

    1-Management oriented-Concentrate on logistic and strategic issues

    and provides momentum to keep up progress and morale

    2-Group oriented kaizen-it is a permanent approach and is represented

    by QC circles and SGAs that uses various statistical tools for problem

    solving. It calls for full PDCA cycle and identifying problems and

    causes.

    3-Individual oriented Kaizen-It is achieved in form of suggestion

    system

    S.No Aspects Management

    oriented

    Group

    Oriented

    Individual

    oriented

    1 Involves Managers QC Circle Everybody

    2 Target System and

    Procedures

    Same

    Workshop

    Work area

    3 Cycle Project Four to Five

    Months

    Anytime

    4 Implement

    cost

    Small

    Investment

    Inexpensive Inexpensive

    5 Result New system

    and facility

    improvement

    Improvement

    and revision

    On the spot

    improvement

    6 Booster Improvement

    in

    managerial

    performance

    Morale

    Participation

    Morale

    Self

    Improvement

    7 Direction Gradual and

    visual

    improvement

    Gradual and

    visible

    improvement

    Gradual and

    visible

    improvement

  • 16

    3.6-Kaizen in action

    In Japanese philosophy there are three components that increases

    waste and hamper the processes. Those are

    1-MUDAWaste

    2-MURIStrain

    3-MURADiscrepancy

    Every activity comprises of-

    The Non value adding part is made up of MUDA, MURI and MURA.

    When we reduce non value adding components, efficiency increases

    and expenditures decreases.

    A) List of MUDAS

    1-Muda of over-production

    2-Muda of repair/rejects

    3-Muda of Inventory

    4-Muda of motion

    5-Muda of method

    6-Muda of Time

    7-Muda of materials

    Value Adding

    Non Value

    Adding Activity

  • 17

    B) 5S Framework for quality improvement

    C) Advantage of 5S

    Less spending on replacing lost or damaged items Less stress Greater self-esteem More space Greater efficiency in achieving goals Greater readiness for new tasks Fewer hazards

    Seiri

    Sorting

    Eliminate all unnecessary tools, parts, and instructions. Go through all tools, materials, and so forth in the plant and work area. Keep only essential items and eliminate what is not required, prioritizing things as per requirements and keeping them in approachable places. Everything else is stored or discarded.

    Seiton

    Setting in order

    There should be a place for everything and everything should be in its place. The place for each item should be clearly labeled or demarcated. Items should be arranged in a manner that promotes efficient work flow. Workers should not have to bend repetitively to access materials. Each tool, part, supply, or piece of equipment should be kept close to where it will be used

    Seiso

    Systemic Cleaning

    Keep the workplace tidy and organized. At the end of each shift, clean the work area and be sure everything is restored to its place. This makes it easy to know what goes where and ensures that everything is where it belongs. A key point is that maintaining cleanliness should be part of the daily work

    Seiketsu

    Standardizing

    Work practices should be consistent and standardized. All work stations should be identical. All employees should be able to work in any station doing the same job with the same tools that are in the same location in every station. Everyone should know exactly what his or her responsibilities are for adhering to the first 3 S's.

    Shitsuke

    Sustain

    Maintain and review standards. Once the previous 4 S's have been established, they become the new way to operate. Maintain focus on this new way and do not allow a gradual decline back to the old ways. While thinking about the new way, also be thinking about yet better ways. When an issue arises such as a suggested improvement, a new way of working, a new tool or a new output requirement, review the first 4 S's and make changes as appropriate.ain

  • 18

    D) Kaizen in Action (Graphical)

  • 19

    4:-CASE STUDIES

    4.1-Case study-111

    Title-Shortening customers telephone waiting time.

    This case study is in reference to a bank where KAIZEN (QC)

    program was implemented to reduce the customers waiting time on

    telephone.

    1-Companys Profile:-

    The organisation at which this case study was taken place was a main

    office of a large bank. An average of 500 customers called this office

    every day. The theme of the companys telephone reception office

    slogan Dont make customers wait, and avoid needless switching

    from extension to extension

    2-Problem/Situation:-

    In a survey at the company it was found that callers tend to become

    irritated if the phone rang more than five times before it was answered

    and often would not call the company again. In contrast a prompt

    answer after just two rings reassured them and made them feel more

    comfortable.

    3-Analysis:-

    1-Discussion/Planning-First staff discussed why the present method

    of answering calls made callers wait. They found following situations

    i) Operator receives the call but due to lack of experience, does not

    know where to connect the call

    11

    Masaaki imai 1984,the key to japans competitive success,Singapore,macgraw hill

  • 20

    ii) The receiver cannot answer the call quickly, perhaps because s/he

    is unavailable or busy and nobody is there to take the call.

    In such situation operator have to transfer call to another extension

    causing delay

    2-Cause and Effect-After arriving at problem participating members

    conducted a survey regarding the callers who waited for more than

    five rings. Members itemized factors at brainstorming session and

    arranged them according to cause and effect.

    3-Setting the target- after intense and productive session team

    members decided to set a goal of reducing waiting callers to zero

    4-Implementation:-

    1-Taking lunches on three different shifts, leaving at least two

    operators at the job all the time

    2- Asking all employees to leave messages when leaving their desks.

    Due to this operator were saved of transferring calls to desk where no

    one is present. It was explained at regular meetings and posters were

    placed all around.

    3- Compiling a directory listing the personnel and their respective

    jobs. It was to help operators to locate personnels easily.

    5-Results:-

    Although the waiting calls could not be reduced to zero, all items

    presented showed a marked improvement.

    Total number of delays incidents dropped from 351 to 59.

    Daily average dropped from 29.2 to 4.8.

  • 21

    4.2-Case Study-212

    Title-Case study at a manufacturing unit Company A

    This case study is in reference to a manufacturing unit in field of

    concrete reinforcement where KAIZEN techniques were applied to

    increase the productivity and efficiency

    1-Companys Profile:-

    This case study was undertaken at a Company A at Iowa which

    deals into the field of concrete reinforcement.

    2-Problems/Situation faced:-

    It was beginning at this plant and company attempted to invent a

    structural reinforcement for concrete that carries all the strength of

    steel while eliminating the problems associated with its weak

    corrosive and thermal characteristics

    So the situation/objective was to-

    a) To develop a new product to match already established product

    b) Removal of weakness in the product

    c) To allow the product to reach more customers

    3-Analysis/Implementation:-

    Step-1.Forming the team and gather the information-

    Datas related to engineering and technical aspects were collected.

    Information regarding market positions on the product is gathered.

    12

    Lee Samson et al,1999-2000,kaizen:an essential tool for inclusion in industrial technology criteria, Journal of industrial technology,vol-16,P3-6

  • 22

    Step-2.Analysis of the process used by company A

    Current method of manufacturing/processing was studied in detail.

    What kind of products are manufactured, how much time is consumed

    in the process, what kind of waste processes are generated are all

    taken into account.

    Step-3.Deciding the goal of the team

    After gathering the detailed information about current process, Kaizen

    team identified the goal. In this case, the team decided to improve the

    method of storing the rods due to the excessive waste generation by

    current storing method

    Step-4.Providing the alternative methods

    Following Kaizen steps, team developed seven technical ideas to

    improve storage of the rods. One of the suggestions was to continue

    with the current method but that was not a waste eliminating process.

    Step-5.Evaluate and select best solution

    The best method was an alternative number two where three rods are

    extruded from the pull-truder. It showed an improvement of 97%

    Step-6.Simulation and evaluation

    To confirm the possibility of implementing the alternative method,

    simulation was undertaken.

    4-Result

    As Company A is a growing company it really benefited

    from the lean thinking and by eliminating waste processes.

  • 23

    4.3-Case study-313

    Title:-Kaizen Implementation in an Industry in India

    This case study was undertaken at HV Axles ltd.

    1-Company Profile

    The company HV Axles ltd which earlier was a division of Telco is

    located in Jamshedpur. The major product of the company is front

    axle and rear axle. It currently supplies its products to Tata Motors

    Jamshedpur and Lucknow plants for commercial vehicles. This

    company is mainly focussed on manufacturing as per customers

    design

    2-Problems faced

    1-Numbers of operators like to exceed in assembly line

    2-Low production efficiency

    3-High production cost

    4-Quality maintaining problems

    5-System for simplification

    13

    gautam Rajesh,kumar Sushil,singh Sultan,2012 kaizen implementation in an industry in India:a case studyIJRMET,vol-2,P27-32

  • 24

    3-Implementation of Kaizen

    1-Problems were discussed to managerial personals, engineers and

    operators levels by considering different factors

    2-Imparting proper level of training. Training was carried out by

    internal/external faculties to create awareness, improving

    communication and operating skills of the employee.

    3-involvement of employees through group activities like quality

    circles, suggestion schemes

    4-Quality indicators had been employed examine the achievement of

    suppliers in quality

    5-Supplier companies were choosed near to the case companies to

    reduce the time spent in distribution.

    6-Kanban was used for transforming the information throughout the

    production process.

    4-Result

    After using Kaizen number of operators remains same as earlier for

    performing the same operation. This was possible only by multi

    skilled and well trained operators.

    Relevant task were given to carry out at relevant work stations.

    Minimization of cost and increase in productivity is achieved because

    operators become efficient.

    Production improved from 210 axles per shift to 300 axles per shift by

    less number of operators.

  • 25

    4.4-Case Synthesis

    Parameters Case Study-1 Case Study-2 Case Study-3

    Problems .Customer Dissatisfaction

    .Weakness in

    Product

    .Storage Problem

    .Low efficiency

    .High Cost

    .Poor Quality

    Cause .Inefficient coordination

    Poor engineering

    Solution

    .Lack of

    multiskilled

    workers

    .Lack of Training

    Objective .Streamlining the process of call

    handling

    .Reducing call

    waiting time

    .Providing new

    solution for

    product quality

    .Expansion

    .Increasing the

    efficiency

    .Creating pool of

    multitasking

    workers

    .Reducing

    Production Time

    Methods .Cause and effect diagram

    .Brainstorming

    session

    Designing new

    storage methods

    .Simulation

    .Cost effectiveness

    .Discussion and

    planning at top

    level

    .Internal and

    external training

    .Use of quality

    programmes like

    JIT and Kanban

    Information

    System

    .Charts/Posters

    .Directory

    Not seen .Electronic data

    interchange

    technique

    .Suggestion

    system

    Changes

    Brought

    Drop in waiting

    time for callers

    .Better storage

    system

    .Multiskilled

    employees

    .Increased

    production

    .Reduction in

    production time

    Result .Positive .Not fully

    achieved

    Positive

    .Positive

    .Reduced Time of

    Production

    \

  • 26

    5:-Lessons Learnt

    A) Overall

    1-KAIZEN is a process oriented approach, hence has lasting impact

    2- There is a high level of employee involvement which enhances

    their morale and motivation.

    3- It helps to improve quality, thereby enhancing customer

    satisfaction.

    4-It helps to improve productivity resulting in low cost of operation.

    5- It helps to reduce the rate of accidents thus improving work safety.

    6- It aids in waste reduction in areas such as inventory, waiting time,

    transportation and others which in turn aids in better utilization of

    space and resources.

    B) Relevance to INDIA

    In todays scenario of globalization our Indian companies are not

    behind in implementing KAIZEN in their unit/plants/offices so as to

    reduce waste and increase efficiency.

    1- As we just seen that HV axles successfully implemented

    KAIZEN to increase production

    2- Escorts Agri machinery plant implement KAIZEN in their plant

    to minimise waste and achieve specific goals. They implement it

    through SGAs

    3- Moser Baer Plant at Greater Noida implement KAIZEN to

    minimise defects in their manufacturing

    4- Lucas TVS, Chennai, Tamil Nadu conserved energy in capitive

    diesel generation sets through KAIZEN. It enabled them to

    conserve 84000 litres of high speed diesel per year.

  • 27

    6-Conclusion

    Kaizen means improvement. It means small improvements done

    consistently over a long period of time. If we integrate the kaizen

    principles into our workplace, we will see improvements right away,

    and great improvements in the long term. We will see improvements

    in at the workstations, in the office and in our employees.

    Kaizen is a philosophy that needs the involvement of all people in the

    company. Emphasis should be placed on reduction in time, removal

    of waste processes to meet the goal, and elimination of unnecessary

    operations, activities and workstation.

    It is also apparent that many organizations could gain from utilizing

    the lean thinking approach. However the major components of Kaizen

    are the use of teams, the use of problem-solving tools, and an

    orientation to the lean thinking philosophy to reduce muda.

    .

  • 28

    Overall Cycle:

    14

    14

    Source: Archfield Consulting Group

  • 29

    7:-References/Bibliography

    1-BOOKS

    a) Sharma.d.d(2000) Total quality management, Delhi sultanchand &sons

    b) Charantimath Poornima,(2003) total quality managementDelhi,Pearson education

    c) Masaaki imai 1984,the key to japans competitive success,Singapore,macgraw hill

    2-Journals

    1-Mishra, Gupta anshul2010, kaizen culture: enabling organizational change

    management, GJEIS, vol-2

    http://www.ejournal.co.in/gjeis/index.php/GJEIS/article/viewFile/112/62

    2-Lee Samson et al, 1999-2000, kaizen: an essential tool for inclusion in

    industrial technology criteria, JIT, vol-16,

    http://atmae.org/jit/Articles/lees1101.pdf

    3-Farris.A.Jennifer et al, 2008, learning from less successful kaizen events-a

    case study, EMJ, vol-20,

    http://lostlagoon.info/IMFILES/5PCS%20Learning%20from%20less%20succes

    sful%20Kaizen%20events.pdf

    4-gautam Rajesh, Kumar Sushil, singh Sultan, 2012 kaizen implementation in an industry in India: a case studyIJRMET, vol-2, http://www.ijrmet.com/vol2/a984.pdf

    3-Websites for Images

    1- leanimprovement.blogspot.com

    2- http://www.wcmfg.com 3- http://www.kaizentek.com