Kahin UROPPoster · Title: Kahin UROPPoster Created Date: 3/9/2016 9:36:34 PM
Transcript of Kahin UROPPoster · Title: Kahin UROPPoster Created Date: 3/9/2016 9:36:34 PM
Determiningthelinguisticbackgroundofparticipantsisaveryimportantstepinlanguageresearch.DevelopedbyBosch&Sebastián-Gallés (2001),theLanguageExposureQuestionnaire(LEQ)determinesthepercentageofinputachildisexposedtoperlanguage.Thisinterview-stylequestionnaireindirectlymeasuresthelanguageexposureofinfantsthroughparentalestimatesandisfrequentlyusedinbilingualismresearch(Byers-Heinlein,2015).However,theseparentalreportscanbebiasedandcaninaccuratelydepictlanguageuseinbilingualhouseholds.Newtechnologynowallowsforamoredirectmeasureofachild'slanguageenvironment.
TheLanguageEnvironmentAnalysis(LENA)systemisadigitallanguageprocessorthatrecordsandanalyzesthechild’saudioenvironment.TheLENAsystemhasbeenusedinresearchtomeasurethespeechstyleofinputbuthasyettobeusedasameasureoflanguageexposure(Weisleder &Fernald,2013;Ramírez-Esparzaetal.,2014).
ThisstudyaimstocomparetheestimatedpercentagesofexposureobtainedusingtheLEQandusingtheLENAsystem.Theestimatesarehypothesizedtodifferandsucharesultmayleadustoquestionthevalidityofusingindirectmeasurestoevaluatelanguageexposure.
Introduction
Methods
TwoFrench-Englishbilingualinfantsweretestedandforeachparticipant,fourestimatesofglobalexposureweredetermined.ParentsfilledouttheLEQandgaveaglobalestimateofthepercentageofFrenchandEnglishthattheirinfantisexposedto.AnotherestimatefromtheLEQwascalculatedusingtheweeklyexposureestimates.
ParentswerethengiventheLENAsystemandrecorded8hoursontwotypicaldaysathome.Thetotaladultwordcount(AWC)andmeaningfulspeechtime(MST)wereautomaticallycalculatedbytheLENAanalysissoftware.Therecordingswerecodedper5-minuteblockasEnglishinput,Frenchinput,oramixofboth.Thecodingwasusedtodeterminethepercentageofadultwordsandmeaningfulspeechheardineachlanguage.
TheLENAsoftwareestimatedthatintotal,Participant1heard15,542adultwordsand1hour46minutesofmeaningfulspeechperday(1day=8hours).Thecodingofthe5-minuteblocksshowedthatoutofallmeaningfulspeechandwordsheardbyParticipant1,16%ofthespeechwasFrench.Thiscomparestoaparentalestimateof40%FrenchintheLEQ.
ThesepreliminaryfindingswereobtainedfromonlytwoparticipantssodefinitiveconclusionsontheefficacyoftheLEQasameasureoflanguageexposurecannotbemade.Also,bothparticipantswereEnglish-dominantsofurtherresearchmustincludebalancedandFrench-dominantbilingualinfantsintheanalysis.
TheresultsfounddoseemtoindicatethatadiscrepancydoesexistbetweenparentalestimatesandestimatesderivedfromtheLENArecordings,especiallyforParticipant1.Theparentalestimateof40%FrenchwascalculatedbytheLENAsystemtobe16%French.Also,inthe5-minuteaudioblockscodedasmixed,thereoftenwasagreaterpercentageofEnglishspokenthanFrench,whichmaymeananevensmalleramountofFrenchexposure.Theoverestimationfoundintheparentalreportsmayonlybeapplicabletotheminoritylanguagebutmoreresearchisnecessarytodeterminethis.
Anotherinterestingfindingishowtheamountofadultwordsheardrelatestotheamountofmeaningfulspeechheard.Participant1heardalmosttwiceasmanywordsasParticipant2heard.However,theamountofmeaningfulspeechheardbyeachinfantwassimilar.AsshowninRamírez-Esparzaetal.,thequalityofspeechchildrenhearismoreimportantthanthesheerquantity(2014).
Asthisresearchfurtherdevelops,theLEQestimatesmaybefoundtobeaninaccuratemeasureofexposureforbilingualinfants.Thismayleadresearcherstoquestionthevalidityofpaststudiesthatusedindirectmeasurestocorrelatelanguageexposurewithothervariables,suchasvocabularysizeandlexicalprocessingefficiency.
ConclusionResults
Bosch,L.,&Sebastián-Gallés,N.(2001).Evidenceofearlylanguagediscriminationabilitiesininfantsfrombilingualenvironments. Infancy, 2(1),29-49.Byers-Heinlein,K.(2015).Methodsofstudyinginfantbilingualism.InJ.W.Schwieter (Ed.), TheCambridgehandbookofbilingual processing (pp.133-154)Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,2015.Ramírez-Esparza,N.,García-Sierra,A.,&Kuhl,P.K.(2014).Lookwho'stalking:Speechstyleandsocialcontextinlanguageinputtoinfantsarelinkedtoconcurrentandfuturespeechdevelopment. DevelopmentalScience, 17(6),880-891.Weisleder,A.,&Fernald,A.(2013).Talkingtochildrenmatters. Psychological Science, 24(11),2143-2152.
57.58 60 84.46 83.7542.42 40 15.54 16.250
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
LEQ GEP LENA(AWC) LENA(MST)
Percen
tageofe
xposure(%
)
Measureofexposure
Participant1- Bilingualpercentagesofexposure
%English
%French
71.22 70 82.87 82.6128.78 30 17.13 17.390
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
LEQ GEP LENA(AWC) LENA(MST)
Percen
tageofe
xposure(%
)
Measureofexposure
Participant2- Bilingualpercentagesofexposure
%English
%French
Figure2.Globalpercentagesofexposureforparticipant1.
Figure1.Compositereportofaudioanalysis inLENAsoftware.
ThisresearchwasfundedbyaSSHRCgrantawardedtoC.T.F.IwouldliketothankDr.Fennellforsupervisingthisresearchproject,StéphanieMonetteforhelpwithdatacollectionandstatisticalanalysis,allparticipantsforprovidingdata,andtheOfficeofUndergraduateResearchforprovidingopportunitiestoconductresearchattheundergraduatelevel.
References
LENA versus LEQ: Measuring bilingual infants’ language exposureZeinab Kahin, Stéphanie Monette, Dr. Christopher Fennell
Language Development Lab, University of Ottawa
Participant2heardatotalof8172adultwordsand1hour21minutesofmeaningfulspeechperday.OutofallmeaningfulspeechandwordsheardbyParticipant2,17%ofthespeechwasFrench.Thiscomparestoaparentalestimateof30%FrenchintheLEQ.
Figure3.Globalpercentagesofexposureforparticipant2.
NostatisticalanalysestocorrelatetheLEQandLENAestimatescouldbeconductedduetothelownumberofparticipants.ThecorrelationbetweenAWCsandMSTs,however,wasanalyzedperparticipant,perlanguage,andglobally.Overall,strongpositivecorrelationsbetweenthetwovariableswerefound,indicatingthatastotaladultwordcountincreases,totalmeaningfulspeechincreasesandviceversa.
Globally Participant1 Participant2 English French
r .878 .917 .756 .876 .868
Table1.CorrelationsbetweenAWCsandMSTs(p≤ .001).
Acknowledgments
ContactInformation:[email protected]