K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011...
-
Upload
charlene-byrd -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011...
![Page 1: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
K. Slifer, UNH
The 8th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited NucleonsMay 17-20, 2011
NSTAR 2011
![Page 2: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
This talk
Brief overview of spin structure
Recent Results from JLabSpin Duality (Hall A)RSS (Hall C)
Finite Size effects in bound state Q.E.D. Proton Charge RadiusHydrogen HF splittingRole of SSF measurements
Upcoming MeasurementsE08-027 and E08-007
![Page 3: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
This talk
Brief overview of spin structure
Recent Results from JLabSpin Duality (Hall A)RSS (Hall C)
Finite Size effects in bound state Q.E.D. Proton Charge RadiusHydrogen HF splittingRole of nucleon resonances
Upcoming MeasurementsE08-027 and E08-007
![Page 4: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
This talk
Brief overview of spin structure
Recent Results from JLabSpin Duality (Hall A)RSS (Hall C)
Finite Size effects in bound state Q.E.D. Proton Charge RadiusHydrogen HF splittingRole of nucleon resonances
Upcoming JLab MeasurementsE08-027 and E08-007
“g2p & gep”
![Page 5: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Inclusive ScatteringInclusive Scattering
€
W
° * Q2 : 4-momentum transferX : Bjorken Scaling varW : Invariant mass of target
Kinematics1st order Feynman diagram
![Page 6: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Inclusive ScatteringInclusive Scattering
€
W
° *
Inclusive Cross Section deviation from point-like behavior
characterized by the Structure Functions
1st order Feynman diagram
Q2 : 4-momentum transferX : Bjorken Scaling varW : Invariant mass of target
![Page 7: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Inclusive ScatteringInclusive Scattering
€
W
° * When we add spin degreesof freedom to the targetand beam, 2 Additonal SFneeded.
Inclusive Polarized Cross Section SFs parameterize everything
we don’t know about proton
structure
![Page 8: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
H.Burkhardt and W.N. Cottingham Annals Phys. 56 (1970) 453.
Assumptions:
the virtual Compton scattering amplitude S2 falls to zero faster than 1/x
g2 does not behave as (x) at x=0.
R.L. Jaffe Comm. Nucl. Part. Phys. 19, 239 (1990)
Discussion of possible causes of violations
“If it holds for one Q2 it holds for all”
BC Sum Rule
![Page 9: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
If we assume BC to hold,
we can learn something about the low x region
using only our high x measured data.
How Big are Higher twist contributions at low X?
![Page 10: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
0leading twist partsatisfies BC exactly
HT
![Page 12: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
0
HT
well known
![Page 13: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
HT
![Page 14: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
we measure this
we can’t access this low xcontribution
HT
![Page 15: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
what we measure
![Page 16: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
what we measureplaces an upper limiton the low-x HT contribution to 2
![Page 17: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
RSS Experiment (Spokesmen: Rondon and Jones)
K.S., O. Rondon et al. PRL 105, 101601 (2010)
Q2 = 1.3 GeV2
![Page 18: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
RSS Experiment (Spokesmen: Rondon and Jones)
K.S., O. Rondon et al. PRL 105, 101601 (2010)
consistent with zero => low x HT are small in proton.
(proton)
Q2 = 1.3 GeV2
![Page 19: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
RSS Experiment (Spokesmen: Rondon and Jones)
K.S., O. Rondon et al. PRL 105, 101601 (2010)
consistent with zero => low x HT are small in proton.
non-zero by 2.6
=>Significant HT at low x needed to satisfy Neutron BC sum rule.
(proton)
(neutron)
Q2 = 1.3 GeV2
![Page 20: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Neutron HT contribution to low x
Global Analysis of JLab Neutron g2 Data
P. Solvignon et. al, in Prep
Plot courtesy of Nilanga Liyanage
PRELIM 1/Q2 fit
![Page 21: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Neutron HT contribution to low x
Global Analysis of JLab Neutron g2 Data
P. Solvignon et. al, in Prep
Plot courtesy of Nilanga Liyanage
PRELIM 1/Q2 fit
Consistency across all exps.(E94010, RSS, E01012)
Follows rough 1/Q2 trend
HT contribution 0 by about Q2=3 GeV2
![Page 22: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Applications to Bound State Q.E.D.Applications to Bound State Q.E.D.
nucleus ≈ 10-15
Atom ≈ 10-10
The finite size of the nucleus plays a small but significant role in atomic energy levels.
![Page 23: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
nucleus ≈ 10-15
Atom ≈ 10-10
The finite size of the nucleus plays a small but significant role in atomic energy levels.
Hydrogen HF Splitting
Applications to Bound State Q.E.D.Applications to Bound State Q.E.D.
![Page 24: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
nucleus ≈ 10-15
Atom ≈ 10-10
The finite size of the nucleus plays a small but significant role in atomic energy levels.
Hydrogen HF Splitting
Friar & Sick PLB 579 285(2003)
Applications to Bound State Q.E.D.Applications to Bound State Q.E.D.
![Page 25: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Elastic Scattering
Structure dependence of Hydrogen HF Splitting
Z=-41.0±0.5ppm
![Page 26: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Inelastic
Structure dependence of Hydrogen HF Splitting
Nazaryan,Carlson,Griffieon PRL 96 163001 (2006)
pol≈ 1.3±0.3 ppm
0.2265 ppm
Elastic piece larger but with similar uncertainty
integral of g1 & F1
pretty well determined from F2,g1 JLab data
![Page 27: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Inelastic
Structure dependence of Hydrogen HF Splitting
Nazaryan,Carlson,Griffieon PRL 96 163001 (2006)
pol≈ 1.3±0.3 ppm
0.2265 ppm
Elastic piece larger but with similar uncertainty
weighted heavily to low Q2
![Page 28: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Hydrogen Hyperfine StructureHydrogen Hyperfine Structure
E08-027
Dominated by this region due to Q2 weightingDominated by this region due to Q2 weighting
assuming CLAS model with 100% error
Inte
gran
d of
¢2
![Page 29: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Hydrogen Hyperfine StructureHydrogen Hyperfine Structure
E08-027
Dominated by this region due to Q2 weightingDominated by this region due to Q2 weighting
But, unknown in this region:
MAID Model
Simula Model
Inte
gran
d of
¢2
So 100% error probably too optimistic
E08-027 will provide first real constraint on 2
assuming CLAS model with 100% error
![Page 30: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Proton Charge Radius from P lamb shift disagrees with eP scattering result by about 6%
<rp> = 0.84184 ± 0.00067 fm Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen
<rp> = 0.897 ± 0.018 fm World analysis of eP scattering
<Rp> = 0.8768 ± 0.0069 fm CODATA world average
R. Pohl et.al Nature, July 2010
I. Sick PLB, 2003
R. Pohl et al. Nature, 2010
![Page 31: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Energy difference between the 2s and 2p levels
Lamb Shift
S-orbital P-orbital
![Page 32: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
radial distance in hydrgenic atom depends inversely on mass
S-orbital P-orbital
+
_
Hydrogen
Lamb Shift
e
![Page 33: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
S-orbital P-orbital
+
_
muonic Hydrogenmuon is about 200 times heaviear than electron
1st Bohr radius is about 200 times smaller
Lamb Shift
![Page 34: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
S-orbital P-orbital
+
_
muonic Hydrogenmuon is about 200 times heaviear than electron
1st Bohr radius is about 200 times smaller
so Lamb shift is enhanced by about 200 compared to eH
Lamb Shift
![Page 35: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
reproduced from R. Pohl et al. Nature, 2010
PSI results on Muonic Hydrogen
Muon Beam incident on H gas
H formed in highly excited state
most decay directly to ground 1S state
small fraction of decay to the 2s level
![Page 36: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
reproduced from R. Pohl et al. Nature, 2010
PSI results on Muonic Hydrogen
Stimulate transitions from 2S-2P
observe increase in decay from 2P-1S
xray of 2 keV
Muon Beam incident on H gas
H formed in highly excited state
most decay directly to ground 1S state
small fraction of decay to the 2s level
![Page 37: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Scan the probe laser frequency
At resonance, stimulating 2S -> 2P transistions
so see an increase in the 2P -> ground state xrays
PSI results on Muonic Hydrogen
reproduced from R. Pohl et al. Nature, 2010
![Page 38: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
PSI results on Muonic Hydrogen
Observed =49.882 THz (= 206.295 meV)
gives rp = 0.84184 ± 0.00067 fm
reproduced from R. Pohl et al. Nature, 2010
![Page 39: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
PSI results on Muonic Hydrogen
Observed =49.882 THz (= 206.295 meV)
gives rp = 0.84184 ± 0.00067 fm
rp = 0.897 ± 0.018 fm Sick (3
reproduced from R. Pohl et al. Nature, 2010
from e-P scattering
![Page 40: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
PSI results on Muonic Hydrogen
Observed =49.882 THz (= 206.295 meV)
gives rp = 0.84184 ± 0.00067 fm
rp = 0.897 ± 0.018 fm Sick (3
rp = 0.8768 ± 0.0069 fm CODATA (5
reproduced from R. Pohl et al. Nature, 2010
from H spectroscopy
![Page 41: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
What could solve the discrepency?
rp = 0.84184 ± 0.00067 fm PSI
rp = 0.8768 ± 0.0069 fm CODATA (5
![Page 42: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
What could solve the discrepency?
Miscalibration of PSI frequency? Very unlikely
QED wrong? Exciting! but unlikely
Calculations incorrect? maybe missing some terms... (muon mass)
Uncertainty underestimated? This is where SSF program can play a role.
rp = 0.84184 ± 0.00067 fm PSI
rp = 0.8768 ± 0.0069 fm CODATA (5NYT : July 12, 2010
For a Proton, a Little Off the Top (or Side) Could Be Big Trouble
![Page 43: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
EXPERIMENTALISTInterpreting
Theoryahead
WARNING
![Page 44: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Splitting of 2S and 2P level is sensitive to rp
![Page 45: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Splitting of 2S and 2P level is sensitive to rp
2% effect200X bigger than in eH
![Page 46: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Total observed shift is combination of
Splitting of 2S and 2P level is sensitive to rp
Lamb Shift
![Page 47: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Total observed shift is combination of
Splitting of 2S and 2P level is sensitive to rp
Lamb Shift
Fine structure
![Page 48: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Total observed shift is combination of
Splitting of 2S and 2P level is sensitive to rp
Lamb Shift
Fine structure
2P Hyperfine structure
2S Hyperfine structure
![Page 49: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Total observed shift is combination of
Splitting of 2S and 2P level is sensitive to rp
Lamb Shift
Fine structure
2P Hyperfine structure
2S Hyperfine splitting
mostly negligible
uncertainty
![Page 50: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Explicit dependence on rp comes from the Lamb shift term
several dozen terms contribute to the Lamb shift, but only a few are really significant:
![Page 51: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Explicit dependence on rp comes from the Lamb shift term
≈205 meV : Relativ. one loop vacuum polarization
≈1.5 meV : NR two loop vacuum polarization
negligible
uncertainty
several dozen terms contribute to the Lamb shift, but only a few are really significant:
![Page 52: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Explicit dependence on rp comes from the Lamb shift term
≈205 meV : Relativ. one loop vacuum polarization
≈1.5 meV : NR two loop vacuum polarization
0.015 ± 0.004 meV : Nuclear Structure correction (“Proton Polarizability”)
negligible
uncertainty
several dozen terms contribute to the Lamb shift, but only a few are really significant:
82% of the total error on the PSI value comes from this term
![Page 53: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
0.015 ± 0.004 meV : Nuclear Structure correction E. Borie Phys.ReV.A (2005)
“This uncertainty is probably underestimated”
Proton Polarizability term
27% relative uncertainty
![Page 54: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
0.015 ± 0.004 meV : Nuclear Structure correction E. Borie Phys.ReV.A (2005)
“This uncertainty is probably underestimated”
In fact its the simple average of several different calculations:
0.0174 ± 0.004 meV Rosenfelder 1999 *0.012 ± 0.002 meV Pachuki 19990.016 ± ? Faustov, Martynenko 2001
this uncertainty is probably not very well constrained by SF data (1999)
Proton Polarizability term
![Page 55: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
How much would this term have to shift to get agreement?
0.015 ± 0.004 meV
PSI results would need to shift by about 3 to coincide with CODATA
![Page 56: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
PSI results would need to shift by about 3 to coincide with CODATA
i.e. need a shift of about 0.187 meV in the predicted splitting which would mean the proton polarizability term is incorrect by an order of magnitude.
This is unlikely but,
given the poor state of knowledge of SSF and FF at very low Q2...
How much would this term have to shift to get agreement?
0.015 ± 0.004 meV
![Page 57: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Upcoming Experiments/Results
![Page 58: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
E08-027 : Proton g2 Structure Function
Primary Motivation
Proton g2 structure function has never been measured at low or moderate Q2.
We will determine this fundamental quantity at the lowest
possible Q2
This will help to clarify several outstanding puzzles
Hydrogen HyperFine Splitting : Lack of knowledge of g2 at low Q2 is one of the leading uncertainties.
Proton Charge Radius : also one of the leading uncertainties in extraction of <Rp> from H Lamb shift.
A. Camsonne J.P. Chen D. Crabb K. Slifer*
![Page 59: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
EG4EG4Ran in 2006
Measurement of g1 at low Q2
Test of ChPT as Q2 0
Measured Absolute XS differences
Goal : Extended GDH Sum RuleProtonDeuteron
NH3: M. Battaglieri, A. Deur, R. De Vita, M. Ripani (Contact) ND3: A. Deur(Contact), G. Dodge, K. Slifer
PhD. StudentsK. Adhikari, H. Kang, K. Kovacs
Spokespersons
€
→
![Page 60: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Low Q2 SSF measurements
EG4: g1p E08-027 : g2p
0.02 < Q2 < 0.5 GeV2
Resonance Region
![Page 61: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Experimental TechniqueExperimental Technique
− P
P
![Page 62: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Experimental TechniqueExperimental Technique
− − P
P
P
P
![Page 63: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Experimental Technique Inclusive Polarized Cross Section differences
We Need:
Polarized proton targetupstream chicanedownstream local dump
Low current polarized beamUpgrades to existing Beam Diagnostics to work at 85 nA
Lowest possible Q2 in the resonance regionSepta Magnets to detect forward scattering
![Page 64: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Hall A E08-027 configuration
![Page 65: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Polarized Ammonia Target
5 Tesla Transverse FieldCurrent = 85 nA
![Page 66: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Moller Polarimeter
Third arm luminosity monitor for cross-check(not shown).
Compton will not be used.
![Page 67: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
New Beam Diagnostics for low current
Slow raster for target
![Page 68: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Up Stream Chicane
2 Dipoles to compensate for target fieldMagnets on loan from Hall C
![Page 69: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Low Power Local Dump
Mag field of target -> beam will not make it to hall dump
![Page 70: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Room Temperature Septum Magnets
-Used in Prex, modified with new coils.-bend 5.6o to 12.5o
-allow access to lowest possible Q2
![Page 71: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Source (%)
Cross Section 5-7
PbPT 4-5
Radiative Corrections 3
Parallel Contribution <1
Total 7-9
Systematic Error Budget
Statistical error to be equal or better at all kins
![Page 72: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
BC Sum Rule Spin Polarizability LT
Projected Results
![Page 73: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Form Super-ratio of left/right Asymmetries:
E08-007 : GE/GM
Measure asym in both HRS simultaneously
G. Ron*, D. Higintbothan, R. GilmanJ. Arrington, A. Sarty, D. Day
![Page 74: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Projected Uncertainties
![Page 75: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Summary
Assuming BC sum rule holds allows extraction of higher twist contribution in DIS
Data consistent across RSS, E01-012, E94010
g1 & g2 play significant role in bound state Q.E.D. calculations
E08-027 and E08-007 now being installed in Hall A for run beginning in the Fall
will provide definitive measurement of g2 and GE/GM at low Q2
![Page 76: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Backup slides
![Page 77: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Spin Polarizabilities
Major failure (>8 of PT for neutron LT. Need g2 isospin separation to solve.
this is the region we should start to be able to trust PT
![Page 78: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Polarizability : Integrals of g1 and g2 weighted by 1/Q4
Zemach radius : Integral of GEGM weighted by 1/Q2
Dominated by Kinematic region of E08-027 and E08-007
![Page 79: K. Slifer, UNH The 8 th International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons May 17-20, 2011 NSTAR 2011.](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022110403/56649e665503460f94b60c74/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
BC Sum RuleBC Sum Rule
P
N
3He
BC satisfied w/in errors for JLab Proton2.8 violation seen in SLAC data
0<x<1
Mostly unmeasured