K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at...

39
K. Honscheid Ohio State University Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories

Transcript of K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at...

Page 1: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. HonscheidOhio State University

Aspen 2006

Beyond the Standard Model

Searches for New Physics at the

B-Factories

Page 2: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Where to look for New Physics?

Page 3: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Experimental Strategies

B,D →,

B→

b→sg penguinsb

d

s f

0K

s

sd

b,c

d

u

b

W+,H+

b→s penguins Z,h0

b s ,,s,ub,c

B,D →Xus,Xus

W+,H+

W+,H+

→ll

~

~LFV

From Hitlin, LHC Lavor Workshop

W+,H+

Surprises

Page 5: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Search for Lepton Flavor Violation in Decays• Lepton flavor is conserved in the Standard Model

– not protected by an underlyingconserved current symmetry

– Neutrino Masses

• Many SM extensions include LF violation

• Observation of LF violation would be a clear signature for new physics

l

~

~

Page 6: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Search for → e PRL 96, 041801 (2006)

signal

tag

e

Positrons Electrons

• 207106 e+e- → +- events• Observe 1 event in a 22 signal box on 1.9±0.4 expected background

Previous limits (all @ 90% CL): Br(- → -) < 0.68 10-7 (BaBar, PRL 95 041802) Br(- → -) < 3.1 10-7 (Belle, PRL 92 171802)Br(- → e-) < 3.8 10-7 (Belle, PLB 613 22)

Br(→ e) < 1.1 10-7 at 90% C.L.

Page 7: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Limits on New Physics – An Example

Just an example with tan=55 Trilinear coupling A0=0 Inverted m hierarchy …

s- i

s LS

P

allo

wed

Br(e)<1x10-8

2x10-85x10-811x10-8

Current BaBar limit

O. Igonkina, SUSY 2005

l and mSUGRAEx

clud

ed b

y LE

P

Exclud

ed b

y CDM

Page 8: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Search for New Physics in the Charm Sector

• D0 MixingFlavor eigenstates are not mass eigenstates with M1,2 and 1,2

• D0 Mixing is small in the SM box diagram: x,y, < few x 10-5

long distance: x ~ 10-3, y ~ 10-2

• Strong phase in hadronic decaysx’ = x cos + y siny’ = y cos – x sin

• Proper Time Fit

Wrong sign

Using D0 K+-, 400 fb-1

hep-ex/0601029

Page 9: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Experimental Limits on D0 mixing

World 95% CL in (x,y)

World 95% CL in y

G. Burdman and I. Shipsey, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 53, 431 (2003)

[arXiv:hep-ph/030076]

(assuming = 0, CPV = 0)

hep-ex/0601029

95% CL Limits (assuming CP) x’2 < 0.72 x 10-3

-9.9 x 10-3 < y’ < 6.8 x 10-3

Note: No-Mixing (0,0) has only 3.9% CL

Page 10: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Rare Charm Decays and CP Violation

Experiment Decay mode ACP (%) Notes

BaBar D+K-K++ 1.41.0 0.8BaBar D+ ++ 0.21.50.6 Res. Substr.

Of D+K-K++

BaBar D+ 0.91.70.7

CLEO II.V D0 + - 0 1 8 Dalitz plot analysis

CDF D0 K+K- 2.0 1.2 0.6 Direct CPV

CDF D0 + - 1.0 1.3 0.6 Direct CPV

FOCUS D0 K+K-+ - 1.0 5.73.7 T violation through triple product correlations

FOCUS D+ KoK++- 2.3 6.22.2

FOCUS DS KoK++ -3.6 6.72.3from S. Stone

Page 11: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Experimental Aside: Single B Meson Beams

Lots of interesting modes include one or more neutrinos.

“Beams” with a single, monochromatic B and without c, QED etc would be very useful for : B, B, BK,…

Fully reconstruct one of the Bs and study the remaining of the event closed kinematics, missing energy reconstruction

Semileptonic D(*)l()5K/fb-1

Hadronic D(*) X3K/fb-1 efficiency purity

Tag types

X=n+m0+pK+qKs

Page 12: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Search for B hep-ex/0507069

SM decay proceeds via W-annihilation diagram

Sensitive to new physics charged current

Analysis:

Undetected neutrinos result in large missing energy and few kinematic constraints – high background.

Reduce the background by reconstructing the second B (“tag B”) in the event in the copious decay mode B→D*0ll

Reconstruct B→ with →lbar or →h, where h = , , or a1

Require no additional charged tracks in the event

Page 13: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Energy in addition to signal candidate (GeV)

+e+e

BaBar SL tags230M BB

Current BaBar 90% C.L.

Expectations from U.T. fit

MC Signal for Br=10-3

Results for B

No signal in 230 M BB events90% CL Upper Limit (Combined with hadronic tags)

Br(B+→) < 2.6 10

Close to the discovery of this mode or NP

…even closer hep-ex/0507034

New Belle analysis using 250 fb-1

4( ) 1.8 10BF B

Page 14: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Higgs sensitivity

mH(G

eV

)

tan

Bbs

both

2HDMGambino, Misiak Nucl. Phys. B611 338Hou Phys.Rev.D48:2342-2344,1993 Limits on 2-Higgs Models from

B

Current limits

Page 15: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Search for Bs +- at the Tevatron

Standard model prediction: Br(Bs +-)= (3.50.9) 10-9

CDF 360 pb-1

300pb-1

No Signal found

Bs+- < 2.010-7 CDFBs+- < 3.910-7 D0

Combined (90% CL)

Bs+- < 1.510-

7

hep-ex/0508058

Page 16: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Affects

EW Penguins: BKl+l-, BK*l+l-, and BXsl+l-

BABAR hep-ex/0507005 (229M BB) Belle prelim. hep-ex/0410006, 0508009

B K *B K

• With l+l- pair, can produce both pseudoscalar and vector mesons• SM: Br(B →Kl+l-) ~ 4 10-7 (± 30% theory) ~3 times that for K*

• Rates• Asymmetries (AFB, CP)• /ee ratio

New Physics affects

Page 17: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

BKl+l- and BK*l+l- : branching fractions

Theory errorsmainly due to form factors.

(rarest observed B decay) 6 (10 )

6( ) (0.45 0.05) 10WAB B K

* 6( ) (1.18 0.17) 10WAB B K

pole at low q2

2q 2q

Page 18: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

BK*l+l-: Lepton F-B Asymmetry

Bl

l

s

q*K

l

Lepton angular distribution in l+ l- rest frame

2q

386 M BB

SM

NP scenarios

constraints on Wilson coeffs describing short-distance physics

hep-ex/0508009

FBA

Page 19: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Little Higgs wMFV UV fix

Extra dim wSM on brane

SupersoftSUSY breakingDirac gauginos

SM-like B physics New Physics in B data

Generic Little Higgs

Generic extra dim w SM in bulk

SUSY GUTs

Effective SUSY

after G. Hiller

MSSMMFV

large tan

MSSMMFV

small tan

Getting Lost?

Page 20: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

BaBar

BELLE

2003 2004 2005

DsJ(2317)

DsJ(2458)

X(3872)Y(3940)

Y(4260)

Z(3930)

continuum

ISR

B decays

B decays

Be ready for surprises

Several new particles have been observed by the B Factories

Different production mechanism Different JPC

For a nice review by Swanson see hep-ph/0601110

Page 21: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

CP Violation in the B System

Present CKM

fit

Present WA

BABAR 0.722±0.040±0.023Belle 0.652±0.039±0.020

0B

fiCPA e

CPf

0B2iq

ep

fi

CPA e

See talk by Aihara for more on CPV

Page 22: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Bounds on new physics from UT fitsCKM Model confirmed by many measurementsNow look for New Physics as correction to CKM Model

The fit to the unitarity triangle constraints:

b

d

b=

W NP+

=

W

Page 23: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Bounds on new physics from UT fits

Constraints: |Vub|, md, SK add:

Ligeti,Silvestrini,Agashe et al

First constraints on d, CBd

In terms of probed new physics mass scale (=m(NP); gNP=coupling)(now)~5gNP TeV

Page 24: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

The next few years (2006 – 2008)

• Belle and BaBar• 1 ab-1 (2006)• 2 ab-1 (2008)

• Tevatron• 2 fb-1 (2006)• 8 fb-1 (2009)

• LHCb is nearing completion

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Jul-99

Jul-00

Jul-01

Jul-02

Jul-03

Jul-04

Jul-05

Jul-06

Jul-07

Jul-08

ICHEP08

See talk by S. Stone on Thursday

Page 25: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Super B-Factory Plans at KEK and Frascati

Interaction RegionCrab crossing

=30mrad.y*=3mm

New QCS

Linac upgrade

More RF power

Damping ring

New Beam pipe

L = 41035/cm2 /sec

Design Luminosity ~ 1 x 1036

/cm2/secSynergy with ILCLots of R&D needed

Next Super B Workshop in Frascati, March 16-18, 2006KEK Frascati

Page 26: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Have Ideas – Need Statistics

Mode BRSM Notes on New Physics

bs ~3 10-4 BF, ACP, and AFB important

bsg ~10-5 each BF not critical. Need events to measure SCP

BXll ~10-6 each BF, ACP, and AFB important

BX ~10-6 each Up to 10-5 each

DXll ~10-6 each Up to 10-5 each

B ~10-4 Experiments close to SM sensitivity

l ~10-40 Up to 10-8

Bll <10-11 Up to 10-5

Dll <10-9 Up to 10-6

Page 27: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. HonscheidOhio State University

Aspen 2006

Additional Transparencies

Page 28: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Let’s rule out at least one NP model

0.133 0.030 0.009 CPA BaBar 2004 New Belle Result:

-0.113+/- 0.022+/- 0.008

232x106 BB’s

Superweak Model (Wolfenstein) is really out

Observation of direct CP violation in

B0K+-

B0K+

B0K+

Page 29: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Implications of Bs +-<1.510-7

Excluded!

M0 [

GeV

]

mSUGRA prediction:Dedes, Dreiner, Nierste PRL87:251804,2001

Page 30: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Search for LFV in → lhh’ PRL 95, 191801 (2005)

hep-ex/0509016

→ eK+K eK+ e+K e+ e+KK e+K e+

UL(107) 1.4 1.7 3.2 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.7

→ K+K K+ +K + +KK +K +

UL(107) 2.5 3.2 2.6 2.9 4.8 2.2 0.7

Br(→ eKs) < 5.6 10-8 at 90% C.L.Br(→ Ks) < 4.9 10-8 at 90% C.L.

Page 31: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

First Search for B→

SM expectation ~ 107

(Compare: 10 for , 10 for e+e)

Helicity (ml/mB)2 and Cabibbo (VtbVtd*) suppressed

Very clean theoretically

Small SM Sensitive to new physics in the loops

hep-ex/0501115

Analysis

Reconstruct the tag B in decays to D(*) and up to 5 kaons and pions

Reconstruct the signal decayB→with →1-prong decaysRequire no additional charged tracks in the event

Require little remaining energy: Eextra < 0.11 GeV

Use correlations between Eextra and the momenta of the reconstructed daughters in a neural net to further reduce the background

Page 32: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Yields a constraint on leptoquark parameter. For example

RH coupling to generations i,j Leptoquark doublet mass

22BtagbeamES pEm

Br(B→) < 3.2 103 at 90% C.L. GeV

B0→ Results hep-ex/0501115

Using 232 106 Y(4S)→BB events we observe263 ± 19 events with 281 ± 40 expected background.

First limit on this mode

Page 33: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Measurement of B(BXsl+l-)

AnalysisSemi-inclusive techniqueXs is reconstructed from K+ or Ks + 0-4 (at most one 0 is allowed)

MXs < 2.0 GeVElectron or muon pair

Mll>0.2GeVCharmonium veto

140 fb-1 used

Theoretical prediction by Ali et al.

Wrong flavor

MXs q2

hep-ex/0503044

eff eff eff eff eff *9 10 7 7 9

22 5 *22

3

2 2 2

ˆ1ˆ 4 48

2ˆ1 2 4 1 12Re

ˆ

F b ts tbem

C

d b s G m V Vs

ds

s C C Cs

C

Decay width for bsll (s=q2/mb2 )

SM

Sign of C7 flipped

Page 34: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Constraints on Ci from B(BXsl+l-)

Clean prediction for B(BXsll) with 1<q2<6GeV2 is available.Combine Belle and Babar resultsSign of C7 flipped case with SM C9 and C10 values is unlikely.

P.Gambino, U.Haisch and M.Misiak PRL 94 061803 (2005)

BF Belle Babar WA SM C7 = -C7SM

q2>(2m)2 4.11±1.1 5.6±2.0 4.5±1.0 4.4±0.7 8.8±0.7

1<q2<6GeV2 1.5±0.6 1.8±0.9 1.60±0.5 1.57±0.16 3.30±0.25

C7SM C7 = -C7

SMC10NP C10

NP

C9NP

Donut : 90% CL allowed region

Page 35: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

2005: Sample used for AFB(BK*ll)(q2)

Sample for BK* l l events 113±13

BK l l control sample 96±12

Treat q2, cos(θ) dependence of bkgs.

Consistent with flat

2001: Belle 1st observed

hep-ex/0503044

Page 36: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

New Measurement of AFB(q2) in K*ll

Forward-backward asymmetry is induced by interference btw virtual photon and Z0 contributions.Relative signs and magnitudes of C7 to C10 and C9 to C10 can be determined from AFB(BK*ll)!!

We do not use Ci but Ai which is leading coefficients.

Page 37: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Fit results for ratios of Wilson coefficients

Null test with K+ll

Projection to AFB

SM

Best fit for negative A7 (SM like) J/ ’

Best fit for positive A7 (non-SM like)

(This solution is also allowed)

Page 38: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

Confidence Level Contours

For any allowed A7, we obtain 95% CL

Sign of A9A10 is negative!!

Sign of A9A10 flipped case is excluded

The first and third quadrants

Sign of A7A10 is not determined yet.

The second and fourth quadrants

Best fit

SM

fit resultA7A10 sign flipped (to SM)

A9A10 sign flippedBoth A7A10 and A9A10 signs flipped

SMA9/A7

A10/A7

SM

Page 39: K. Honscheid Ohio State University Aspen 2006 Beyond the Standard Model Searches for New Physics at the B-Factories.

K. Honscheid, Ohio State University, Aspen 2006

What is the ultimate possible UT precision?

Theoretical limits (continuum methods)Many measurements will not be theory-limited for quite some time

Ligeti: