Jakarta Vertical Kampung Review

OHS Surabaya, Indonesia T +628563107662 E bintang.chairul.putra@gmail.com orangehousestudio.tumblr.com

Orange House Studio

Behind the Event

JVK website banner

Jakarta Vertical Kampung Initiator

Jakarta Vertical Kampung is arranged by SHAU, and hosted by Erasmus Huis, Embassy of the Netherland. JVK is an International event focusing on the creative design exploration of the ‘Vertical Kampung’ concept in Jakarta. This event embodies a master class which is a 12 days long workshop, and then followed by a conference to present and discuss the workshop result, and closed by an exhibition showing the results.

SHAU itself, is an architecture firm based in Netherland, founded and directed by Florian Heinzelmann and Daliana Suryawinata.

Company

Jakarta Vertical Kampung Event Review 2

The Good In-tention

The Vision of Combining Kampung and Verticality

The idea was inspired by Jakarta city itself, where the urban crises are mostly related to over-population or over-density. Which causes the growing amount of slums. And since horizontal expansions are no longer feasible, due to the urban-suburban distance issues, and the fact that the Greater Jakarta is already too big for the populace, the other alternative is to expand vertically. Stacking the ever-accumulating population on top of each other seems to be the closest alternative short-term solution. 

While the long term solution of the over-population issue is actually quite simple, if you don't want things to accumulate, you should spread it, redistribute the population to all area of the country. But at the same time, the implementation would be a little bit tricky. Because it would require the spread of the capital (as in money) to the whole nation, in order to lure the people to transmigrate to a more remote areas. Unfortunately, decisions involving capital, is as politically sensitive as ever. It can very easily be diverted into an ideological debate such as capitalism vs. socialism. Thus putting the execution out of our (engineers) hands. So, let's cope with this short-term solution for awhile.

First of all, started with Daliana’s presentation, she showed her concern about the top-down social housing development. There are numerous social housing projects in the world that end up in dissappointment. She used some examples such as the Pruitt-Igoe project, Kowloon, and De Biljmer project. All these vertical housing end up

Pruitt Igoe, Detroit

De Biljmer, Amsterdam

Torre David, Caracas

“What Jakarta need, along with other developing cities, is multi-programmatic structure based on a community oriented development and cultural context.”

OHS

Jakarta Vertical Kampung Event Review 1

The Masterclass

The Masterclass is a 12 days workshop involving young architects from anywhere to experiment on the possibilities of vertical kampung. The participants were then divided into 6 groups. Varying from 4 to 5 people per group with the addition of 2 teachers. There were six sites spread across Jakarta that are chosen for each group. They are:

Semanan - Our groupNagrakRorotanPenjaringanPenggilinganCibesut

Semanan county location on Jakarta Map

On the first and second day of the masterclass, the participants visited the site for roughly 3 - 4 hours. In order to cultivate as much information about the circumstances such as the existing building, community, commodity, economy, etc. and use the data for the design development.

Site location on Semanan County map

Each of the site offered unique situations. In case of the Semanan site, we found a very rare commodity for a metropolitan Jakarta, which is a paddy field and vegetable gardens. This green space occupied more than 80 percent of the site. The remaining 20 percent or less, is filled with non-formal village of the local farmers. There also happened to be a popular commodity from the nearby kampung, which is tempe (soy bean cake). 

Site map, showing agricultural area

Site map, showing non-formal residencial area

Orange House Studio

Jakarta Vertical Kampung Event Review 2

The Awry Method

Designing Semanan, Vertically

Non-formal residence on the site

Given the agricultural dominance on the site, I assumed that we would create something to accommodate both the people and the agriculture at least 50-50. I assumed wrong.

Off course, the government had requested some very specific conditions for the site, such as: the number of residents, the maximum storeys/building height, they even provide the future master plan mapping of the site. Based on these data, it was clear that the government did not, in the slightest, consider sustaining the agricultural space.

It did not surprise me, these short-sighted-ness has become something of a norm in any government institutions lately. But, what is surprising is that our teacher directed us in fulfilling the government's targets almost unconditionally. With the argument of putting the client in the first priority. 

"In this day and age, we cannot lose anymore agricultural area" - Christophe Girot

By our teacher's guidance, we started designing the structure by calculating the Building Coverage Ratio, Floor

Area Ratio, Building Height, and other technical constraints. All in regards to the official government request and rules of the city planning. And then followed by the building programming.

Still though, Initially, we insisted in experimenting with shapes that accommodate the agriculture space, such as terracing and roof farming. But it had to be put aside once Shau mentioned about the budget constraint. Cheap, is one of the design requirements. Which makes the agriculture preservation even further off the reach.

Building programming process

"Architects and designers have the ability to create beautiful images and diagrams. let's use this to convince the government to do what is good for the people" - Alfredo Brillembourg

Orange House Studio

Jakarta Vertical Kampung Event Review 3

What the Experts Say

There were two review sessions in the masterclass, mid and final review. In these sessions, each group had to present their work. The mid review were attended by Ton Venhoeven. While the final review were attended by handful of architects namely, Eko Prawoto, Budi Pradono, Yori Antar, Nanne de Ru, Stephen Cairns, Pitupong Chaowakil, Bin Kim, and Yonathan Pasodung.

After our presentation, they stood by with an enquiring stare. And judging from their comments we can feel that they didn't seem to be very satisfied with the result. 

"Sometimes, the solution is not in the design"

They were trying to point out that our presentations were too focused on the design. They expected something more from the perspective of the inhabitants. Most of the time, they were asking about the philosophy and concept. Such as what are the basis of the design decisions, what reflects the kampung organic and dynamic environment. etc. Nothing too technical.

If they were to ask our teacher, the answer would be very simple, -- organic and dynamic structures are expensive.-- But we didn't answer that, because it sounded pragmatic, so we explained the few kampung-influenced bits of our design. Which was rather gimmicky.

"Designing an affordable housing doesn't always mean the future of kampung"

It is clear that they view the design proposal to be too similar with the existing social housing structure. By these standards, we might succeed in designing an affordable housing. But they doubt that it would be the future model of kampung.

"It's the attitude to think about the kampung"

Bin Kim suggested that we need to reconsider our perception about kampung. It's still a common thing that people see kampung in a negative way, just like how we portray the word 'slum'. We need to remember that before industrial housing development, we only have kampung. Thus there must be a lot more potential to be cultivated, especially beyond the mere physicality.

Orange House Studio

Jakarta Vertical Kampung Event Review 4

The Result

The View

Site planCommercial area

Orange House Studio

Jakarta Vertical Kampung Event Review 5

The View

Public Spaces

Unit interior

Orange House Studio

Jakarta Vertical Kampung Event Review 6

Conclusion

Although we (OHS) had things figured out even before joining the event, it is still a very remarkable workshop. It acts as the initial step towards a deeper study on kampung. The result from each group craves for further development. And the relationship between Shau and the government could also mean the greater possibility for kampung to be seek after officially. Thanks to Shau for the effort to consider the kampung side of the development, not every agency has the will to even take a look at kampung community. 

By this masterclass, we have the opportunity to learn about both kampung and urban development from diverse perspective, thanks to the great invitee from around the world. So hopefully, from this point forward, urban development will get better for the people in general, with ecology preservation in mind.

Orange House Studio

Jakarta Vertical Kampung Event Review 7

Gallery

Erasmus Huis, JVK venue

Group discussion

Presentation by David Gianotten, OMA

Skype Presentation by Alfredo Brillembourg

Presentation by Pithupong Chauwakul, Super Machine

Orange House Studio

Jakarta Vertical Kampung Event Review 8

Exhibition

Masterclass Group Panels

Our group members

Our Panel

The Studio

Orange House Studio

Jakarta Vertical Kampung Event Review 9