Juvenile Mentoring Subgrantee Reporting Form

download Juvenile Mentoring Subgrantee Reporting Form

of 10

Transcript of Juvenile Mentoring Subgrantee Reporting Form

  • 7/28/2019 Juvenile Mentoring Subgrantee Reporting Form

    1/10

    OFFICE OF JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PREVENTION

    JUVENILE MENTORING GRANT PROGRAM

    1

    DCTAT SUBGRANTEE DATA COLLECTION FORM

    Reporting Period: ________________________

    This document is for your use to assist with gathering information that should be reported into the DCTAT tool.It is not necessary to submit this form to OJJDP. It is only for your information.

    Award Information

    Solicitation: (Prepopulated)Federal award number: (Prepopulated)

    Award Period Start Date: (Prepopulated)(mm/dd/yyyy)

    Award Period End Date: (Prepopulated)(mm/dd/yyyy)

    1. Please enter the total amount of grant (Federal Funds Only): $*Any funds reported only represent an estimate of dollars allocated or used for activities covered by this grant award.

    2. Was there grant activity during the reporting period? ___Yes ___ NoGrant activity is defined as proposed activities in the OJJDP-approved grant application that are implemented or executed with theOJJDP grant.

    3. Please enter the Federal Congressional District(s) of where services are provided: ___________________Check boxes will appear in the system, where you will select your state/territory and Federal Congressional District(s).

    Click http://www.house.gov, to use the zip code(s) of the area(s) served by the project to determine the Federal CongressionalDistrict(s).

    4. Please enter the Project Title:

    a. Please enter the Project Description:

    5. Please enter the Implementing Organization Name:

    6. Please select the implementing organization type:

    ___ Coalition

    ___ Juvenile Justice

    ___ Non-profit community-based organization

    ___ Other community-based organization

    ___ Other government agency

    ___ Police/other law enforcement

    ___ School/Other Education

    ___ Tribal Government

    ___ Unit of local government

    7. Is this award used to implement evidence-based programs? ___Yes ___ No

    8. If yes, select one source from which the program model was cited:

    ___ Blueprints for Violence Prevention___ CASEL (Collaborative for Academic, Social, &

    Emotional learning)

    ___ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    ___ Community Guide to Helping Americas Youth

    ___ Department of Education Safe, Disciplined, &Drug-free Schools

    ___ Drug Strategies, Inc.

    ___ Making the Grade

    ___ Hamilton Fish Institute___ Institute for Medicine

    ___ NIDA Preventing Drug Abuse

    ___ National Institute of Justice What Works Report

    ___ OJJDP Model Programs Guide

    ___ Promising Practices Network

    ___ SAMSHA Model Programs

    ___ Surgeon Generals Youth Violence Report

    ___ Other (e.g., State model program resources)

    9. If other, please specify:

  • 7/28/2019 Juvenile Mentoring Subgrantee Reporting Form

    2/10

    OFFICE OF JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PREVENTION

    JUVENILE MENTORING GRANT PROGRAM

    2

    Target Population for this Subaward

    Please check the appropriate boxes to indicate for this subaward:

    1. The population actually served during the project period; and

    2. The populations, if any, to which the program offers targeted services.

    Targeted services include any services or approaches specifically designed to meet the needs of thepopulation (e.g., gender specific, culturally based, developmentally appropriate services).

    Population1. Did you serve this

    group during thereporting period?

    2. Did this subgrantprovide targeted

    services for any of thefollowing groups?

    RACE/E

    THNICITY

    American Indian/Alaskan Native

    Asian

    Black/African American

    Hispanic or Latino (of any race)

    Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific IslanderOther Race

    White/Caucasian

    Youth population not directly served

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ______

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ______

    ___

    ___

    JUSTICE

    At-Risk Population (no prior offense)

    First Time Offenders

    Repeat Offenders

    Sex Offenders

    Status Offenders

    Violent Offenders

    Youth population not directly served

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    GENDER

    Male

    Female

    Youth population not directly served

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    AGE

    0-10

    11-18

    Over 18

    Youth population not directly served

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    GEO

    Rural

    Suburban

    TribalUrban

    Youth population not directly served

    ___

    ___

    ______

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ______

    ___

    OTHER Mental Health

    Substance Abuse

    Truant/Dropout

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

    ___

  • 7/28/2019 Juvenile Mentoring Subgrantee Reporting Form

    3/10

    OFFICE OF JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PREVENTION

    JUVENILE MENTORING GRANT PROGRAM

    Bold indicates mandatory indicators.

    3

    Performance Measures

    Output Measure Definition Data Grantee Provides Record Data Here

    1 Number and percent of

    youth with whom anevidence-based practice wasused

    The number and percent of youth with whom an

    evidence-based practice was used. Evidence-based practice models include program modelsthat have been shown, through rigorousevaluation and replication, to be effective atpreventing or reducing juvenile delinquency orrelated risk factors, such as substance abuse.Model programs can come from many validsources (e.g., Blueprints, OJJDPs ModelPrograms Guide, SAMHSAs Model Programs,state model program resources, etc.)

    A. The number of youth served using an

    evidence-based model or programB. The number of youth servedC. Percent (A/B)

    2 Increase in number ofprogram mentors recruited

    The number of new mentors recruited during thereporting period. Recruited mentors are thosewho have completed requirements to be ready fortraining.

    Program records are the preferred data source.

    A. The increase in number of program mentorsrecruited (ready for training) during thereporting period

    3 Number and percent ofprogram mentorssuccessfully completingtraining

    The number and percent of program mentorssuccessfully completing training during thereporting period.

    Program records are the preferred data source.

    A.Number of program mentors successfullycompleting training during the reporting period

    B.Total number of program mentors who begantraining during the reporting period

    C.Percent (A/B)

    4 Number and percent oftrained program mentorswith increased knowledge ofthe program area

    The number of trained program mentorsdemonstrating increased knowledge of theprogram during the reporting period.

    Program records are the preferred data source.

    A. Number of trained program mentorsdemonstrating increased knowledge of theprogram during the reporting period

    B. Number of trained program mentors (Auto fillfrom 3A)

    C. Percent (A/B)

    5 Mentor Retention The number of program mentors retained by theprogram within the reporting period.

    Program records are the preferred data source.

    A. Number of mentors who have left the programduring the reporting period

    B. The total number of mentors in the programduring the reporting period

    C. (B A)/B = Mentor Retention Rate

    6 Increase in youth enrolledsince the beginning of thegrant program

    Increase in the number of youth enrolled (beingmentored) since the beginning of the grantprogram.

    A. Number of youth enrolled at the beginning ofthe reporting period

    B. Number of NEW youth added during thereporting period

  • 7/28/2019 Juvenile Mentoring Subgrantee Reporting Form

    4/10

    OFFICE OF JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PREVENTION

    JUVENILE MENTORING GRANT PROGRAM

    4

    # Outcome Measure Definition Data Grantee Provides Record Data Here

    1 Percent of mentoringprograms with activepartners

    The percent of mentoring programs with activepartners representing the following types ofgroups: non-profit service organizations and / orfaith based organizations; private industry;secondary education provider; and post-secondary

    education provider or vocational training provider;other active partners.

    A. Number of mentoring programs with activepartners

    B. Number of mentoring programsC. Percent (A/B)

    2 Number and percent ofprogram youth completingprogram requirements(short term)

    The number and percent of program youth whohave successfully fulfilled all program obligationsand requirements. This does not include youth whoare still in ongoing programs. Program obligationswill vary by program, but should be a predefinedlist of requirements or obligations that clients mustmeet before program completion.

    The total number of youth (the B value) includesthose youth who have exited successfully andunsuccessfully.

    Program records are the preferred data source.

    A. Number of program youth who exited theprogram having completed programrequirements

    B. Total number of youth who exited theprogram during the reporting period (bothsuccessfully and unsuccessfully)

    C. Percent (A/B)

    Select at least one of the following from 3A through 3I depending onthe primary focus of the program.

    3A Antisocial behavior(short term)

    The number and percent of youth who haveexhibited a decrease in antisocial behavior duringthe reporting period.

    Anti-social behavior is a pervasive pattern ofbehavior that displays disregard for and violation ofthe rights of others, societal mores, or the law(such as deceitfulness, irritability, consistentirresponsibility, lack of remorse, failure to conformto social norms).

    Self-report or staff ratings are the most likely datasources.

    A. Number of program youth served during thereporting period with the noted behavioralchange

    B. Total number of youth receiving services fortarget behavior during the reporting period

    C. Percent (A/B)

    3A Antisocial behavior(long term)

    The number and percent of program youth whoexhibited a desired change in antisocial behavior612 months after exiting the program.

    Antisocial behavior is a pervasive pattern ofbehavior that displays disregard for and violation ofthe rights of others, societal mores, or the law(such as deceitfulness, irritability, fighting,disruptive behavior, consistent irresponsibility, lackof remorse, or failure to conform to social norms).

    Self-report or staff ratings are the most likely datasources.

    A. Total number of youth who exited theprogram 6-12 months ago who had thenoted behavioral change

    B. Total number of youth who received servicesfor the target behavior and who exited theprogram 612 months ago

    C. Percent (A/B)

  • 7/28/2019 Juvenile Mentoring Subgrantee Reporting Form

    5/10

    OFFICE OF JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PREVENTION

    JUVENILE MENTORING GRANT PROGRAM

    5

    # Outcome Measure Definition Data Grantee Provides Record Data Here

    3D Gang resistance/involvement

    (short term)

    The number and percent of program youth who

    have exhibited a desired change in gangresistance behavior during the reporting period.

    Self-reported or staff ratings are the most likelydata sources.

    A. Number of program youth served during the

    reporting period with the noted behavioralchangeB. Total number of youth receiving services for

    target behavior during the reporting periodC. Percent (A/B)

    3D Gang resistance/involvement(long term)

    The number and percent of program youth whoexhibited a desired change in gang resistancebehavior 612 months after exiting the program.

    Self-report or staff ratings are the most likely datasources.

    A. Total number of youth who exited theprogram 6-12 months ago who had thenoted behavioral change

    B. Total number of youth who receivedservices for the target behavior andwho exited the program 612 monthsago

    C. Percent (A/B)

    3E Substance use (short term) The number and percent of program youth whohave exhibited a decrease in substance use duringthe reporting period.

    Self-report or staff ratings are most likely datasources.

    A. Number of program youth served during thereporting period with the noted behavioralchange

    B. Total number of youth receiving services fortarget behavior during the reporting period

    C. Percent (A/B)

  • 7/28/2019 Juvenile Mentoring Subgrantee Reporting Form

    6/10

    OFFICE OF JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PREVENTION

    JUVENILE MENTORING GRANT PROGRAM

    6

    # Outcome Measure Definition Data Grantee Provides Record Data Here

    3E Substance use(long term) The number and percent of program youth whoexhibited a decrease in substance use 612months after exiting the program.

    Self-report, staff rating, or urinalysis are most likely

    data sources.

    A. Total number of youth who exited theprogram 6-12 months ago who had thenoted behavioral change

    B. Total number of youth who receivedservices for the target behavior and who

    exited the program 612 months agoC. Percent (A/B)

    3F School attendance(short term)

    The number of program youth who have exhibitedan increase in school attendance during thereporting period.

    Self-report or staff ratings are most likely datasources.

    A. Number of program youth served during thereporting period with the noted behavioralchange

    B. Total number of youth receiving services fortarget behavior during the reporting period

    C. Percent (A/B)

    3F School attendance(long term)

    The number and percent of program youth whoexhibited a desired change in school attendance612 months after exiting the program.

    Self-report or official records are the most likely

    data sources.

    A. Total number of youth who exited theprogram 6-12 months ago who had thenoted behavioral change.

    B. Total number of youth who receivedservices for the target behavior and who

    exited the program 612 months agoC. Percent (A/B)

    3H GPA (short term) The number and percent of program youth whoexhibited an increase in GPA during the reportingperiod.

    Self-report or staff ratings are most likely datasources.

    A. Number of program youth served during thereporting period with the noted behavioralchange

    B. Total number of youth receiving services fortarget behavior during the reporting period

    C. Percent (A/B)

    3H GPA(long term) The number and percent of program youth whoexhibited a desired change in GPA 612 monthsafter exiting the program.

    Self-report or official records are the most likelydata sources.

    A. Total number of youth who exited theprogram 612 months ago who had thenoted behavioral change

    B. Total number of youth who receivedservices for the target behavior and whoexited the program 612 months ago

    C. Percent (A/B)

  • 7/28/2019 Juvenile Mentoring Subgrantee Reporting Form

    7/10

    OFFICE OF JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PREVENTION

    JUVENILE MENTORING GRANT PROGRAM

    7

    # Outcome Measure Definition Data Grantee Provides Record Data Here

    3I

    4 Number and percent ofprogram youth whoOFFEND (short term)

    Updated 11/04/2011

    The number and percent of participating programyouth who were arrested or seen at a juvenile courtfor a delinquent offense during the reportingperiod. Appropriate for any youth-serving program.Official records (police, juvenile court) are thepreferred data source.

    The number of youth tracked should reflect thenumber of program youth that are followed or

    monitored for arrests or offenses. Ideally thisnumber should be all youth served by the programduring this reporting period.

    A youth may be committed to a juvenile facilityanytime that he/she is held overnight.

    Certain jurisdictions refer to adjudications assentences.

    Example: If I am tracking 50 program youth then,A would be 50. Of these 50 program youth that Iam tracking, if 25 of them were arrested or had adelinquent offense during the reporting period,then B would be 25. This logic should follow for

    C values. The percent of youth offendingmeasured short-term will be auto calculated in D.

    A. Number of program youth tracked during thereporting period

    B. Of A, the number of program youth who hadan arrest or delinquent offense during the

    reporting period

    C. Number of program youth who werecommitted to a juvenile facility during the

    reporting period

    D. Number of program youth who weresentenced to adult prison during the

    reporting period

    E. Percent OFFENDING (B/A)

  • 7/28/2019 Juvenile Mentoring Subgrantee Reporting Form

    8/10

    OFFICE OF JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PREVENTION

    JUVENILE MENTORING GRANT PROGRAM

    8

    # Outcome Measure Definition Data Grantee Provides Record Data Here

    5 Number and percent ofprogram youth whoOFFEND (long term)

    Updated 11/04/2011

    The number and percent of participating program

    youth who were arrested or seen at a juvenile court

    for a delinquent offense during the reporting

    period. Appropriate for any youth-serving program.

    Official records (police, juvenile court) are the

    preferred data source.

    The number of youth tracked should reflect the

    number of program youth that are followed or

    monitored for arrests or offenses 6-12 months after

    exiting the program.

    A youth may be committed to a juvenile facility

    anytime that he/she is held overnight.

    Certain jurisdictions refer to adjudications as

    sentences.

    Example: A grantee may have several youth who

    exited the program 6-12 months ago, however,they are tracking only 100 of them, therefore, andthe A value will be 100. Ofthese 100 programyouth that exited the program 6-12 months ago.65 had an arrest or delinquent offense during thereporting period, therefore the B value should berecorded as 65. This logic should follow for Cvalues. The percent of youth offending measuredlong-term will be auto calculated in D.

    A. Total number of program youth who exitedthe program 6-12 months ago that you aretracking

    B. Of A, the number of program youth who hadan arrest or delinquent offense during the

    reporting periodC. Number of program youth who were

    committed to a juvenile facility during thereporting period

    D. Number of program youth who weresentenced to adult prison during thereporting period

    E. Percent OFFENDING (B/A)

    6 Number and percent ofprogram youth whoRE-OFFEND(short term)

    Updated 11/04/2011

    The number and percent of participating program

    youth who were arrested or seen at a juvenile court

    for a new delinquent offense during the reporting

    period. Appropriate for any youth-serving program.

    Official records (police, juvenile court) are the

    preferred data source.

    The number of youth tracked should reflect the

    number of program youth that are followed or

    monitored for new arrests or offenses. Ideally this

    number should be all youth served by the program

    during this reporting period.

    Certain jurisdictions refer to adjudications as

    sentences.

    Example: If I am tracking 50 program youth then

    the A value would be 50. Of these 50 program

    youth that I am tracking, if 25 of them had a new

    arrest or had a new delinquent offense during the

    reporting period, then B would be 25. This logic

    should follow for C, D, and E values. The

    percent of youth re-offending measured short-term

    will be auto calculated in F.

    A. Number of program youth tracked during thereporting period

    B. Of A, number of program youth who had anew arrest or new delinquent offense duringthe reporting period

    C. Number of program youth who wererecommitted to a juvenile facility during thereporting period

    D. Number of program youth who weresentenced to adult prison during thereporting period

    E. Number of youth who received anothersentence during the reporting period

    F. Percent RECIDIVISM (B/A)

  • 7/28/2019 Juvenile Mentoring Subgrantee Reporting Form

    9/10

  • 7/28/2019 Juvenile Mentoring Subgrantee Reporting Form

    10/10

    OFFICE OF JUVENILE JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PREVENTION

    JUVENILE MENTORING GRANT PROGRAM

    10

    # Outcome Measure Definition Data Grantee Provides Record Data Here

    10 Number or percentage of

    youth who are

    RE-VICTIMIZED (short term)

    Updated 11/04/2011

    The re-victimization measure counts the number of

    youth who experienced subsequent victimization.

    Victimization can be physical or psychological; it

    also includes harm or adverse effects to youths

    property.

    The number of youth tracked should reflect the

    number of program youth that are followed or

    monitored for re-victimization. Ideally this number

    should be all youth served by the program during

    the reporting period.

    Example: If I am tracking 50 program youth, then,

    the B value would be 50. Of these 50 program

    youth that I am tracking, if 25 of them were re-

    victimized during the reporting period, then B

    would be 25. The percent of youth who are re-

    victimized measured short-term will be auto

    calculated in C based on A and B values.

    A. Number of program youth tracked during thereporting period for re-victimization

    B. Of A, the number of program youth whowere re-victimized

    C. Percent RE-VICTIMIZED (B/A)

    11 Number or percentage of

    youth who are

    RE-VICTIMIZED (long term)

    Updated 11/04/2011

    The re-victimization measure counts the number of

    youth who experienced subsequent victimization.

    Victimization can be physical or psychological; it

    also includes harm or adverse effects to youths

    property.

    The number of youth tracked should reflect the

    number of program youth that are followed or

    monitored for re-victimization 6-12 months after

    exiting the program.

    Example: If I am tracking 50 program youth, then,

    the B value would be 50. Of these 50 program

    youth that I am tracking, if 25 of them were re-victimized during the reporting period, then B

    would be 25. The percent of youth who are re-

    victimized measured long-term will be auto

    calculated in C based on A and B values.

    A. Number of program youth who exited theprogram 6-12 months ago that you are

    tracking for re-victimization

    B. Of A, the number of program youth whowere re-victimized during the reporting

    period

    C. Percent RE-VICTIMIZED (B/A)