Juvenile Justice 2013 Annual ReportP R E S E N T E D B Y M A R I E L C A B A L L E R O , P R O G R A M M A N A G E R J U V E N I L E P R O B AT I O N

C O N T R I B U TO R S : T H E J U V E N I L E J U S T I C E C O U R T; P R O B AT I O N D E PA R T M E N T, J U V E N I L E S E R V I C E S A N D I N S T I T U T I O N S D I V I S I O N S ; D I S T R I C T AT TO R N E Y ’ S O F F I C E ; O F F I C E S O F T H E P U B L I C D E F E N D E R A N D A LT E R N AT E D E F E N D E R ; S O C I A L S E R V I C E S A G E N C Y, D E PA R T M E N T O F FA M I LY A N D C H I L D R E N S E R V I C E S ; M E N TA L H E A LT H D E PA R T M E N T; A N D W. H AY W O O D B U R N S I N S T I T U T E .

Youth Population Served

010,00020,00030,00040,00050,00060,00070,00080,000

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

Demographic Shifts in Population 1993-2012(ages 10-17)

White Black Latino API Native American

44%29%

4%

3%

29%

36%

22% 32%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

1993 2012

Population Change 1993-2012

White Black Latino API Native

Trends of System Involvement

9,720

2,078 2112 1614

8,303

1,629 2153 1615

6,612

1,754 1851 1511

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

Arrest Petitions Filed Refer to Juvenile Hall Admission to Juvenile Hall

Trends of System Involvement

2011 2012 2013

Arrests and CitationsNumbers: 6612 arrests◦ 3,051 diverted to the Prevention Early Intervention

(PEI) Unit (46%)◦ 1,754 Petitioned

Trends: There were 20% fewer arrests in 2013 than in 2012

Most Frequent Reasons: Property Crimes (32%); Drug/Alcohol (20%)

Disparities: Black youth 6.7 and Latino youth 3.7 times more likely to be arrested than White youth

Geography: 56% of arrests were youth from the East and Central San Jose

Drug/Alcohol20%

Felony Person6%

Other12%

Other Person

11%Property

32%

Return from Other

Status/Courtesy13%

Weapon6%

2013 Arrests by Offense Category (not including DRP)

Arrests and Citations: Demographics

258383

688

1409

1715 1898

261

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

12 &under

13 14 15 16 17 18 &Over

2013 Arrests/Citations by Age

5100, 77%

1512, 23%

2013 Arrests

Male Female

Arrests and Citations: Racial and Ethnic Disparities

Number and Rate of Arrests to 2013 Youth Population

White Black Latino Asian/PI All Other

Total

Youth Population (10-17)53,219 5,191 66,612 59,481 538 185,041

Arrests 950 624 4,424 280 334 6612

Youth Population Percent 29% 3% 36% 32% 0% 100%

Arrest Percent 14% 9% 67% 4% 5% 100%

Rate of Arrest (per 1,000 youth) 18 120 66 5 ** 36Disparity Gap: Times More Likely

to be Arrested6.7 3.7 (.3)

Arrests and Citations: Geography462

430 429

353 352304

260 250 243210

0

100

200

300

400

500

Top Ten Zip Codes with Arrests (2013)

Arrests and Citations: Trends in Geography

Arrests: Top 10 Residence Zip Codes

2011 2012 2013 % Change 2012-2013

95116 580 562 462 -18%95111 702 492 430 -13%95122 622 622 429 -31%

(Gilroy) 95020 536 470 353 -25%95127 534 421 352 -16%

Unknown/Out of County 399 350 304 -13%95112 433 322 260 -19%95123 383 349 250 -28%95148 306 266 243 -9%

(Morgan Hill) 95037 270 211 210 -0%All Other Zip Codes with Arrests 4955 4238 3319 -28%

Total Arrests 9720 8303 6612 -20%

CSP 95122 (Overfelt) Workgroup

649

497

44 26129

369

16 140

100

200

300

400

500

600

White Black Latino Asian Other

95122 Arrests 2012 & 2013

2012 2013

Intake and AdmissionsAdmission Numbers: 1,511

Trends: There were 6% fewer admissions in 2013 than in 2012

Most Frequent Reasons: Violations of Probation (33%); Property Crimes (26%).

Racial and Ethnic Disparities: Black youth were 10 times and Latino youth were 6 times more likely to be detained than White youth.

Geography: 95116 and 95111 were the zip codes that had the highest number of youth admitted to secure detention.

Age: 17 and 16 year olds accounted for 63% of all referrals to Juvenile Hall.

1614 16151511

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2011 2012 2013

Admissions to Juvenile Hall (2011-2013)

Intake and Admissions

Property Crimes,

26%

Felony Person,

16%

Other Crimes, 8%

VOP, 33%

Other Hold, 1%

Drugs, Alcohol 4%

Weapon Crimes, 9%

Other Person, 4%

2013 Percent of Admissions by Offense Category

306

165

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2007 2013

One Day Count in Juvenile Hall (2007-2013)

Intake and Admissions: Overrides

Intake and Admissions: Racial and Ethnic Disparities

Numbers and Rate of Admission to Population 2013

White Black Latino Asian/PI

All Other

Total

Youth Population (10-17)53,219 5,191 66,612 59,481 538 185,041

Admissions to Detention 135 158 1,152 34 32 1,511

Youth Population Percent 29% 3% 36% 32% 0% 100%

Admission to Detention Percent 9% 10% 76% 2% 2% 100%

Rate of Admission (per 1,000 youth) 3 30 17 1 ** 8Disparity Gap: Times More Likely to be

Detained10 5.6 (.3)

PetitionsPetition Numbers: 1,754

Trends: 21% fewer petitions in 2013 than 2011.

Most Frequent Reasons: Car Theft (12.5%), Residential Burglary (11%), and Resisting Arrest (8%)

Disparities: Black youth were 11 times and Latino youth were 6.7 times more likely to be petitioned than White youth.

2231

16311754

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

2011 2012 2013

Number of Petitions by Year

Petitions: Offenses

219201

148

93 90 85 8068 61 60

0

50

100

150

200

250

Car Theft Res.Burglary

ResistingArrest

Poss. StolenVehicle

Robbery CommercialBurglary

Battery Petty Theft Misd.Vandalism

FelonyVandalism

Top 10 Most Frequent Charges at Time of Petition (2013)

Petitions: Racial and Ethnic DisparitiesNumbers and Rate of

Petitions to Population 2013

White Black Latino Asian/PI All Other Total

Youth Population (10-17)

53,219 5,191 66,612 59,481 538 185,041

Petitions 153 171 1337 76 18 1754Youth Population

Percent29% 3% 36% 32% 0% 100%

Petition Percent 9% 10% 76% 4% 1% 100%Rate of Petition (per

1,000 youth)3 33 20 1 2 9

Petition Disparity Gap 11 6.7 (.3)

Direct File Cases (2013)White Black Latino Asian/PI Native/

OtherTotal

Youth Eligible for Direct File but Remain in Juvenile Court 14 24 107 9 0 154

Directly Filed 3 7 35 2 0 47

Total youth Eligible for Direct File 17 31 142 11 0 201

Percent of Eligible Youth who are Directly Filed 18% 23% 25% 18% 0 23%

Updated 12/2/14

Most Serious Offenses for which Youth were Directly Filed in Adult Court (2013)

11

98

7

5

32 2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Attempted Murder Murder Robbery Assault Carjacking Kidnap whileCarjacking

Sex Crimes All Other

Updated 12/2/14

Direct File Comparison 2012-2013White Black Latino Asian/

PIOther No Data Total

2012 Direct File 1 1 25 1 1 6 34

2013 Direct File 3 7 35 2 0 0 47

Percent Change 200% 600% 40% 100% -100% -100% 38%

% of Eligible Youth Who Are Directly Filed 2012-2013White Black Latino Asian/

PIOther No Data Total

2012 % of Eligible Filed 11% 6% 17% 8% * * 17%

2013 % of Eligible Filed 18% 23% 25% 18% 23%

Updated 12/2/14

Defense Counsel

1405

635

327

1083

418 445

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

PDO ADO IDO

Number of Cases Defended by PDO, ADO & IDO 2012 & 2013

2012 2013

Deferred Entry of Judgment

44

9

115

21

47

9

120

16

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

White Black Latino Asian/PI

Number of youth Successfully Completing DEJ

2012 2013

81%

41%

57%68%

82%

41%

56%

94%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

White Black Latino Asian/PI

DEJ Success Rates (2012-2013)

2012 2013

Specialty Courts

2 3

14

02 1

5

19

38

0 1

7

1 14

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

CITA JTC FV/DV

Specialty Court New Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity 2013

White Black Latino Asian/PI Other

New Enrollments in Specialty Courts• Court for the Individualized Treatment of

Adolescents – 8 new youth• Juvenile Treatment Court – 26 new youth

enrolled• Family/Domestic Violence Court – 64 new

youth enrolled• Dually Involved Youth Court – 71 youth had

241.1 Hearings

Dually Involved Youth241.1 Hearing Referrals by

Race and Ethnicity 2013White Black Latino Asian/PI Other Total

2011 15 11 37 2 0 65

2012 19 10 44 1 0 75

2013 19 18 32 1 0 71

% Change 2011-2013 26.7% 63.6% -13.5% -50.0% 0% 9.2%

Commitments and Placements

204

128

91

00

50

100

150

200

250

Juvenile Hall Commitment PIP, Foster Care, Res. Home Ranch DJJ

2013 Commitments & Placements from Dispositions

Secure Care/Placement Alternatives

605

171

100 95

0

150

300

450

600

Post-Court EMP Wraparound EDGE/PEAK Post-Court CRP

2013 Number of Youth in Alternatives

Trend: Placement vs. Wraparound Services

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

# of

You

th

Placement and Wrap Services 2011-2013

Placement WRAP

2011 2012 2013

Trend: Youth Population at DJJ345

108

14 10

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

FY99 FY05 FY12 FY13

Trend: Youth at the Enhanced Ranch Program

105

54

0

50

100

150

2007 2013

One Day Count: Enhanced Ranch Program

Trend: Violations of Probation

Trend: Victim Services

575

1500

661

900

750

1273

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Victims Served Youth Served in Victim Awareness Classes

2011 2012 2013