June2013en

18
MONTHLY REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE SKOLKOVO FOUNDATION June 2013

description

 

Transcript of June2013en

Page 1: June2013en

MONTHLY REPORT ON THE

ACTIVITIES OF THE SKOLKOVO

FOUNDATION June 2013

Page 2: June2013en

2

Mo

nth

ly R

epo

rt o

n A

ctiv

itie

s R

esu

lts,

Ju

ne

KPI Unit Target amountResult as of 30.06.2013

Management comments

Number of applications for intellectual property rights as a result of Skolkovo’s innovative

activities (including copyright)Pieces 100 45

12 applications were submitted for intellectual property rights during the month of June. The biggest number of applications was submitted for strategic direction “Energy Efficiency” (40%)

Share of external co-financing attracted for completion of participants’ projects

% 50 43

21 grants were approved since the beginning of the year, out of which 5 grants belonged to Stage 2 (co-financing ≥50%), 7 grants to Stage 1 (co-financing ≥25%), 9 mini grants (don’t need co-financing)

1. Participants

KPI Unit Target amountResult as of 30.06.2013

Management comments

Number of jobs created in R&D centers of key partners, establishment of which on the territory

of Skolkovo has been agreed uponPlaces 500 370

In June number of jobs in R&D centers increased by 16 places due to signing agreements with “Dauria Aerospace” and Accenture.

Engagement of venture investors (VI):

share of investments of accredited VI in total amount of investments in participants as compared to share of participants having attracted external financing from partners

% 20 28,7Fulfillment of KPI and completion of Investment Services work plan in whole conducted as scheduled.

2. Partners

Page 3: June2013en

3

Mo

nth

ly R

epo

rt o

n A

ctiv

itie

s R

esu

lts,

Ju

ne

Object NameScheduled deadline

of current stage*Status as of 30.06.2013

Management comments (incl. new construction term in case of plan deviation)

Scheduled deadline for object

handing over

1. SkolTech complex

Stage “P” – July 2013

Project documentation prepared by “Ove ARUP”

December 2014CEW begin in July

2013

Signing agreement on excavation scheduled until the end of June 2013

2 .Technopark complex

Stage “P” – March 2013

Project documentation prepared by “Ove ARUP”

October 2014CEW begin in May

2013Agreement on excavation scheduled until the end of June 2013

3. Apartments

Stage “P” – February 2013

Project documentation prepared by “Valode et Pistre” in April

November 2014

CEW begin in May 2013

Agreement on excavations and poling signed. Contractor mobilized and conducts the works.

5. Objects of social infrastructure:

5.1. Family campusState “P” – August

2013Project organization selected. Design in process October 2014

5.2.ClinicStage “P” – October

2013Procurement documentation in process of endorsement January 2015

3. City (1/5)

Completion date re-scheduled for more than 2 months

Completion date re-scheduled for up to 2 months

Completion date according to the schedule

*Stages presented on Slide 4

Page 4: June2013en

4

Mo

nth

ly R

epo

rt o

n A

ctiv

itie

s R

esu

lts,

Ju

ne

Object NameScheduled deadline

of current stage*Status as of 30.06.2013

Management comments (incl. new construction term in case of plan deviation)

Scheduled deadline for object handing

over

6. Central Zone:

6.1 Teaching blockStage “P” – August

2013Works on engaging an architect for developing Architectural Design Concept and Project Documentation are in process

January 2015

6.2 Student blockStage “P” – July

2013Works on engaging an architect for developing Architectural Design Concept and Project Documentation are in process

August 2014

6.3 Market block (Cultural Center, City Hall)

Stage “P” – September 2013

Works on engaging an architect for developing Architectural Design Concept and Project Documentation are in process

January 2015

7. General City Systems of engineering & technical provision:

7.1. Roads & main engineering communications on Boulevard

CEW end in December 2013

According to the schedule, construction conducted by “Moskapstroy”

March 2014

7.2. Roads & main engineering communications on Parkway

Stage “P” – May 2013

Project Documentation on Parkway prepared in JuneMarch 2014

(1st stage)CEW begin in July

2013Selection of executor for CEW in process

8. Complex beautification and landscaping

Stage “P” – September 2013

Design conducted by “Gorinzhproject” September 2015

3. City (2/5)

Page 5: June2013en

5

Mo

nth

ly R

epo

rt o

n A

ctiv

itie

s R

esu

lts,

Ju

ne

3. City (3/5)Design & construction stages

Stage Stage Content

Stage “P”Design contract signed

Project Documentation development finished (Stage “P”)

CEW begin

Contract signing for preliminary works (for construction)

Preliminary works begin

CEW begin

CEW end CEW end

Operation launchBegin of complex test

Object operation launch

Page 6: June2013en

6

Mo

nth

ly R

epo

rt o

n A

ctiv

itie

s R

esu

lts,

Ju

ne

# Project NameInvestor/Key Partner Name

Object area

PlotPlot area,

ha

Financing volume (City Programme),

mln. rub.

Scheduled signing of

lease agreement

with investment

terms*

Comments

Lease agreements with investment terms signed

1Business Center in Skolkovo

NC DIT 21 700 D3 1,62 1 606 May 2013 -

2 R&D Center RENOVA Renova Pub 26 500 Z2.1-03 2,54 2 060 April 2013 -

Preliminary agreements signed

1 Sberbank Technopark Sberbank 76 740 D1-01 7,96 5 539 April 2013 Lease agreements in Sberbank for endorsement, delay on behalf of Sberbank2 Sberbank MegaCOD-2 Sberbank 37 000 Z2.1-01 4,07 7 000 April 2013

3R&D Center Transmashholding

Transmash/Alstom

25 000 D2-15 2,72 1 459 August 2013 Agreement in Transmashholding for endorsement

4 R&D Center MOEKBROAD Group/ MOEK

13 900 D1-09 0,77 790* August 2013 Due to company sale, project completion

terminated; offered to KAMAZ

5 STC “Tatneft” Tatneft9 000 –

13 000D1-02 0,84 708 August 2013

Agreement submitted for endorsement, signing planned as scheduled

6 Transport Hub Finmart 30 000 Z1-06 n/a 3 000 May 2014 Agreement submitted for endorsement

7 Engineering networks FSK n/a n/a 4 757 July 2013

Due to absence of project documentation in FSK, FSK does not sign binding agreement,

Foundation can not control compliance with schedule concerning operation launch of power supply objects, risk of launch deadline wrecking

exists

* For preliminary agreements – scheduled term of signing

3. City (4/5)

Page 7: June2013en

7

Mo

nth

ly R

epo

rt o

n A

ctiv

itie

s R

esu

lts,

Ju

ne

# Project NameInvestor/

Key Partner Name

Object area

Plot Plot area, ha

Financing volume (City Programme),

mln. rub.

Scheduled signing of

lease agreement

with investment

terms*

Comments

Preliminary agreements signed

8 STC JSC “TMK” JSC “TMK” 8 000 D4-02b 1,94 480*September

2013Agreement submitted for approval,

signing planned as scheduled

9 R&D Center “Kamaz”JSC “Kamaz”

12 000 D1-09 1,11 720*September

2013Agreement submitted for approval,

signing planned as scheduled

10 R&D Center “Dauria” Dauria 10 000 Being defined Being defined 600*September

2013

Negotiations on accommodation options in the Innovation Center in

process

Agreements planned for signing

1 Boeing 9 000 Being defined Being defined 540* November 2013 -

2 Cisco15 000 –

20 000Being defined Being defined 900* August 2013 -

* Amounts calculated preliminarily by multiplication of estimated cost of construction in the amount of 60,000 rubles/sq. m. of the object area

KPI UnitTarget amount

Result as of 30.06.2013

Management comments

Volume of external co-financing attracted for city

construction

Billions rubles

34 3,6 (24,2)

• Binding treaties signed with Renova Pub (2.06 bln. rub) and NP “DIT” (1.6 bln. rub.)• Preliminary agreements for the amount of 24.3 bln. rub signed (including during last 3

months)• 2 preliminary agreements planned for signing• Documentation endorsement on 4 investment competitions in process• 4 investment competitions planned for announcement in July

3. City (5/5)

Page 8: June2013en

8

Mo

nth

ly R

epo

rt o

n A

ctiv

itie

s R

esu

lts,

Ju

ne

KPI Unit Target amountResult as of 30.06.2013

Management comments

Average term on taking decision for grant approval:

A) participant status via preliminary approval procedure;

B) participant status without preliminary approval procedure;

C) grants to participants

Calendar daysA) 40B) 30C) 70

A) 30B) 25C) 77

Deviation of actual indexes from target indexes on taking decisions for providing grants is due to:• Calendar gap in reviewing (submitted in 2012, review completed in 2013);• Discreteness in timing of in-person meetings of the Grand Committee (decision can be taken only at the Grant Committee meeting which takes place once in three weeks)

Compliance with the Foundation budget (except budget for construction of innovation city)

% -10 -59

Budget performance as of 30.06.2013 equals to 41% of the Budget volume for 6 months due to terms of procurement procedures and contracting, which objectively transfers payments to the upcoming periods within 2013

4. Foundation

KPI Unit Target amountResult as of 30.06.2013

Management comments

Share of attracted new members of online community (relation of registered accounts to

total number of unique visits)% -1,5 2,6

Excess of KPI target amount means that the share of target audience representatives (ecosystem participants) is higher among the site visitors

5. Community

Page 9: June2013en

Еж

емес

яч

ны

й о

тчет

о р

езул

ьта

тах

дея

тел

ьн

ост

и,

ию

нь

Appendixes

Page 10: June2013en

10

Mo

nth

ly R

epo

rt o

n A

ctiv

itie

s R

esu

lts,

Ju

ne

31.05.201331.05.2013

Total 929

250

75

94

216

294

77

253

297

195218

95

940

Total number of participants

as of 30.06.2013

Total number of participants

as of 30.06.2013

Total number of applications for receiving participant status and for preliminary review during

the entire period of the project equals to 4,884, of which 805 applications during the 6 months of 2013.

Appendix 1. Participants attraction dynamics

Page 11: June2013en

11

Mo

nth

ly R

epo

rt o

n A

ctiv

itie

s R

esu

lts,

Ju

ne

Total administrative units of Russian Federation presented 44

* Indicated in brackets is increase for the reporting month

Astrakhan 5 Omsk & region 3Bryansk region 1 Oryol 1Vladivostok 1 Penza region 1

Vladimir & region 3

(+1)Perm 7

Volgograd 1 Petrozavodsk 1Voronezh 2 Rostov region 1Yekaterinburg & region 28 Ryazan 3Ivanovo 1 Samara 3

Izhevsk 1 Saint-Petersburg110(+1)

Irkutsk 2 Saransk 4Kazan & Tatarstan 25 Saratov 7Kaliningrad 1 Stavropol krai 1Kaluga & region 4 Syktyvkar 1Kemerovo 3 Tver 2Krasnodar & krai 4 Tomsk 20Krasnoyarks & krai 13 Tula 1Leningrad region 1 Tyumen 1

Moscow 524 (+6)

Ulyanovsk & region 3

Moscow region 79 Ufa & Bashkortostan 7

Nalchik & Kabardino-Balkariya 2 Cheboksary & Chuvashia 3

(+1)

Nizhniy Novgorod & region 16

(+2)Chelyabinsk & region 9

Novosibirsk & region 28 Yaroslavl & region 6TOTAL 940

Appendix 2.Territorial location of participants

Page 12: June2013en

12

Mo

nth

ly R

epo

rt o

n A

ctiv

itie

s R

esu

lts,

Ju

ne

874.26

2,939.76

1,214.56

2,641.08

2,940.05

3,350.64

1,061.86

561.01

0 5,000

2010 2011 2012 Jan 1 - June 30, 2013

140114

199

89

20

270290

329

83 91

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

IT EnEff Bio Nuc Space

Grants approved in 2013

Grants disbursed in 2013

*With consideration of changes by results of report acceptance

Average share of project co-financing during the entire period of the project equals to 43.7% with consideration of CPI and 45.7% without consideration of CPI

Number of grants, approved for disbursement during the entire period of the project equals to 207 (21 approved in 2013), out of which 92 mini-grants

Appendix 3. Grants to Participants

Amount of grants approved

Amount of grants disbursed

Grant approval & disbursement by years*, mln. rub.

Grant approval & disbursement by cluster in 2013, mln. rub.

Total, mln. rub.Total,

mln. rub.

6 090,7

9 492,4

Page 13: June2013en

13

Mo

nth

ly R

epo

rt o

n A

ctiv

itie

s R

esu

lts,

Ju

ne

Results as of 31.05.2013

Results as of 30.06.2013 TOTAL

33 Applications submitted: 12 18 15 45

25for invention or useful model, Russian and international

9(+2)

16(+6)

12(+4)

37

8 for trademark registration 3 2 3 8

for computer software registration

9Number of applications for IP objects in procession

1 3 2 4 10

Next month plan:

Applications submitted for IP objects – 8

*Given in brackets is increase for the reporting month

Appendix 4. Applications for intellectual property rights (CIP data)

Page 14: June2013en

14

Mo

nth

ly R

epo

rt o

n A

ctiv

itie

s R

esu

lts,

Ju

ne

Main indexesas of 31.05

∆ as of 30.06

Number of companies – Skolkovo Foundation key partners

33 - 35

Number of corporate R&D centers planned for location in Skolkovo

28 2 30

Estimate number of personnel in R&D centers for 2015, persons

3 181 330 3 511

Estimate of aggregate budget for R&D centers until end of 2015, bln. rub. 31,5 1,4 32,9

Estimate of current number of personnel in R&D centers

1 112 26 1 138

Number of corporate venture funds financing Skolkovo participants (NAVI and Columbus Nova (CG “Renova”), Intel Capital (Intel))

3 - 3

List of Foundation Key Partners

International (21) Russian (14)

Nokia Corporation KAMAZSiemens  RU-COMMicrosoft OSKEADS  Holding “Composit”Ericsson Reshetnev ISSGeneral Electric SFC “Sistema”Nokia Siemens Networks CG “Renova”Cisco Tatneft EMC TNK-VRSchneider Electric CG “RosatomHoneywell JSC “Lukoil”Alstom TransmashholdingIntel TMKIBM Dauria AerospaceSAPBoeingTATAJohnson&JohnsonSamsungDanfossAccenture

35 key partners include 21 large international company Foreign companies plan constructing R&D centers on the territory of Innovation Center, with total number of

personnel for 2015 – 1,612 persons; volume of invested funds until 2015 – 17, 874, 528 thou. rub.

Appendix 5. Key Partners

Page 15: June2013en

15

Mo

nth

ly R

epo

rt o

n A

ctiv

itie

s R

esu

lts,

Ju

ne

15 (+0 in June)15 (+0 in June)

90 (+0 in June) 90 (+0 in June)

List of accredited investors**

Russian (36) Foreign (21)SIF RVK Tatarstan IVF Exigen BVP MC Leader NAVI Pangaea Russia Partners VTB Capital Leta Group I2BF Oxford Bioscience Bioprocess Bright Capital Fleming Garage Biofund RBK iTech Capital Sofinnova Columbus Nova Maxwell Troyka Dialog E.Ventures Helix Ventures C-Group Bin Finam Inerjys Intel Capital Allianz Rosno Russ-Invest Quadriga Alloy Ventures WEB-innovations Trinfiko Fjord Wermuth Sberinvest Indigo Capital Net Element Tamir FishmanForesight Dauria KomtekAlmaz Capital FPPIRuna Frontier Softline YakutiaAmhurst Capital Prostor CapitalMC Univer V.G. KulikovS.A. Tikhonov AddVenture O.A. Yevdokimenko WAARDE

21,1(+0,3 in June)

21,1(+0,3 in June)

Total agreements on accreditation

for the amount of bln. rub.

Total agreements on accreditation

for the amount of bln. rub.

1,3(+0 in June)

1,3(+0 in June)

Binding treaties signed* on investment for the amount of bln. rub.

Binding treaties signed* on investment for the amount of bln. rub.

* Co-financing under grant agreements** Highlighted bold are funds established with participation of JSC “RVK”

Number of participants supported by accredited funds

Number of participants supported by accredited funds

7,67,6 00

Out of them with foreign investors for the amount, bln. rub.

Out of them with foreign investors for the amount, bln. rub.

Out of which foreign fundsOut of which foreign funds

1 8601 860

4 4614 461

Evaluation of intentof accredited corporate venture funds

by the end of 2015, mln. rub.

Evaluation of intentof accredited corporate venture funds

by the end of 2015, mln. rub.

Out which foreign fundsforeign funds, mln. rub.Out which foreign fundsforeign funds, mln. rub.

9.1 10.5 1,6

0 5 10 15 20 25

2011 2012 2013Investor accreditation, bln. rub.

Appendix 6. Attracting venture capital, co-financing of participants

Page 16: June2013en

16

Mo

nth

ly R

epo

rt o

n A

ctiv

itie

s R

esu

lts,

Ju

ne

27 3 10 17 24

28 4 11 18 25

29 5 12 19 26

30 6 13 20 27

31 7 14 21 28

1 8 15 22 29

2 9 16 23 30

June 2013

Appendix 7. Foundation Key Events

13.06 Seed Forum conducted in Hypercube5.06 Discussion on role of IP in innovative development of Russian Federation

20-22.06 St. Petersburg International Economic Forum

•Agreement on cooperation between Skolkovo Foundation, Intel and “Kamaz”

•Agreement with Dutch non-commercial organization SurfNet

•Agreement between Skolkovo Foundation and non-commercial Foundation “Web Ready”

•Agreement on cooperation between SkolTech and St. Petersburg State University

•Agreement on cooperation with Accenture

17.06 Launch of R&D lab “Siemens” in Skolkovo

18.06•Meeting with first students of SkolTech•Launch of Technology Center Cisco in Hypercube Skolkovo

26.06 Inter-State Council on cooperation in scientific & technological and innovation spheres took place in Hypercube

19.06 Meeting with Dutch companies, universities, institutions for development and support of innovations and entrepreneurship took place in Skolkovo Technopark

Page 17: June2013en

17

Mo

nth

ly R

epo

rt o

n A

ctiv

itie

s R

esu

lts,

Ju

ne Center of Oil and Gas Technologies received intellectual property rights. Rospatent adopted positive

decision on issuing patent for invention application “METHOD OF OIL PRELIMINARY PREPARATION IN FIELDS WITH MULTISTAGE SEPARATION” (author – A.A. Khamukhin, project leader).

Essence of innovation

• Online web-modeling for monitoring and management of separation and utilization of associated petroleum gas (APG)• Together with APG, liquid oil is also burnt on torches. Project will allow to be more energy efficient by receiving information on chemical

composition of oil and gas at any oilfield plot and correcting technological parameters.• Information is collected by way of intellectual data processing, received from sensors in the field, and mathematical modeling of phase

transformation of hydrocarbons

• Development and market entering with fault-tolerant, high-performance and energy efficient processors with essentially new multicell architecture for space and telecommunication applications

• Main advantages: Fault-tolerant Dynamic reconfiguration Defect-tolerant production Natural immunity against viruses Cryptographic capabilities Anti-hacker properties

Agreement on cooperation signed between JSC “Multiklet” and Eurolink Systems Group – one of the largest companies in the field of microelectronics, working on orders of the European Space Agency

Essence of innovation

Appendix 8. Skolkovo Participant Companies (1/2)

Page 18: June2013en

18

Mo

nth

ly R

epo

rt o

n A

ctiv

itie

s R

esu

lts,

Ju

ne “TheraMAB” announced receiving 2nd venture investment tranche in the amount of 157 mln. rub.

Second stage of financing was fulfilled by “Bioprocess Capital Ventures”

Essence of innovation

• “TheraMAB” Ltd plans to enter Russian and world pharmaceuticals markets with a medicine on the basis of an original monoclonal antibody (mAB). Developed antibody TAB08 is a first-in-class humanized mAB of IgG4 class, connecting co-stimulating receptor CD28, specific for human T-lymphocytes. Receptor CD28 is expressed on the surface of the absolute majority of human CD4+ T-cells, where it effectively co-stimulates activation and increase of T-cells.

• Uniqueness of the mechanism of molecule action as compared to other mAB is the impact in the underlying cause of the illness by way of normalizing functional balance of various types of cells, and not consequences of autoimmune illnesses by blocking the forming inflammation processes

• “Avtodoria” system is a hardware & software complex designed for vehicle speed measurement by way of calculating the time which it took to coverthe distance between recorders placed along the road.

• Technologies of state number optic recognition, GLONASS and EDS• Main advantages: Compliance with traffic rules on longer distances Unnoticeable for radar detectors Legal validity of data due to use of EDS Low implementation costs Exact determination of place and time Permanent control along the entire road Search of vehicles

“Avtodoria” launched a test version of a fixation system preventing speed violations in Republic of Kazakhstan

Essence of innovation

Appendix 8. Skolkovo Participant Companies (2/2)