(June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System...

62
NEW MEDIA, SOCIAL SCHOLARSHIP CAROLYN.HANK@MCGILL.CA Assistant Professor School of Information Studies SCHOLARS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THEIR BLOGS WITHIN THE SYSTEM OF SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION 5TH BLOOMSBURY CONFERENCE ON E-PUBLISHING & E-PUBLICATIONS JUNE 30, 2011 LONDON, UK

description

Event: Fifth Bloomsbury Conference on E-Publishing and E-Publications, London, UK, June 30, 2011.

Transcript of (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System...

Page 1: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

NEW MEDIA, SOCIAL SCHOLARSHIP

[email protected] Professor ▪ School of Information Studies

SCHOLARS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THEIR BLOGS WITHIN THE SYSTEM OF SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION

5TH BLOOMSBURY CONFERENCE ON E-PUBLISHING & E-PUBLICATIONS

JUNE 30, 2011 ▪ LONDON, UK

Page 2: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

How do scholars who

blog perceive their blog

in relation to their

cumulative scholarly

record?

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

Page 3: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

How do scholars who

blog perceive their blog

in relation to long-term

stewardship?

Who do they perceive

as responsible as well

as capable for blog preservation?

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

Page 4: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

What blog characteristics impact preservation?

What blogger behaviours impact preservation?

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

Page 5: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

UNITS & DATA SOURCES

Questionnaires

Interviews

Blog AnalysisBLOGGER

BLOG

Page 6: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

Academic Blog

Portal

Purposive Sampling

POPULATION

<http://www.academicblogs.org>

Page 7: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

(29%)

125 Single-Blogs | 65 Co-Blogs

History| Economics | Law | BioChemPhys

ELIGIBLE BLOGS

Page 8: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

ELIGIBLE BLOGGERS

107 Single-Bloggers | 187 Co-Bloggers

Page 9: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

QUESTIONNAIRES

Completed sample:

153 respondents

RR 1: QI: 63% | QII: 46% | QI/II: 52%

Outcome rates derived from Internet surveys of specifically named persons

from the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR, 2009)

Page 10: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

INTERVIEWS

24 semi-structured

phone interviews

72 (47%) of QI & QII respondents expressed interest

Page 11: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

BLOG ANALYSIS

Coded 93 blogs

57 to 63 Indicators

(on/off blog)

Authorship Attributes

Blog Elements & Features

Rights & Disclaimers

Authority & Audience

Blog Publishing Activity

Post Features

Archiving

Page 12: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

results12/48

Page 13: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

%

post-secondary institution

OCCUPATION

BLOGGER

Page 14: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

%

(n=58)

Distinguished/

Chaired Prof.

Professor/

Full Prof. +

OCCUPATION

BLOGGER

Page 15: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

AGE

years

(range 25 to 70 years old)

mean real age

BLOGGER

Page 16: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

(range 0 to 39 years)

mean professional age

years

AGE

BLOGGER

Page 17: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

%

are male

GENDER

BLOGGER

Page 18: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

ESTABLISHED PUBLICATION AND SERVICE HISTORY

BLOGGER

Page 19: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

monograph (author)book chapter

peer-reviewed article

comment (journal)book review

conference proceedingsessay.article.op-ed (other)

textbookmonograph (editor)book review (other)

BLOGGER

Page 20: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

SERVICE

0% 100%

Manuscript/book

evaluator

Journal article

referee

Journal editor/

associate editor38%

70%

79%

BLOGGER

91% have

performed

at least 1 of

these service

activities

Page 21: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

%

BLOG INSTANCES

publish to 2 or more blogs

BLOGGER

Page 22: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

%

do not tweet

MICROBLOGGING

BLOGGER

Page 23: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

%

first blog published to

BLOG HISTORY

BLOGGER

Page 24: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

(57% between 5 to 8 years old)

mean blog age

years

BLOG AGE

BLOG

Page 25: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

IDENTITY

Real name | Both | Pseudonym

84 138% %%

BLOG

Page 26: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

%

BLOGGING

update their blog 1+

times per week

BLOGGER

Page 27: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

%

BLOGGING

published a new post

within the previous week

BLOG

Page 28: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

%

make all of their posts

publicly available

POSTING

BLOGGER

Page 29: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

Average posts per month

(2,726 posts published August 1-31, 2010)

posts

POSTING

BLOG

Page 30: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

PRIMARY AUDIENCE

0% 100%

General public

Colleagues and

professional peers

Everyone elsestudents, family, friends, others

8%

32%

61%

BLOGGER

Page 31: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

%

ENGAGEMENT

employ a post

commenting feature

BLOGGER

Page 32: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

%

respond to comments

ENGAGEMENT

BLOGGER

Page 33: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

%

post comments to other

blogs 1+ times per week

ENGAGEMENT

BLOGGER

Page 34: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

%

COMMENTS

of most recent posts

had zero comments

BLOG

Page 35: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

So looked at posts

from 1 year earlier

BLOG

COMMENTS

Page 36: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

COMMENTS 2009

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

0 1 2-3 4-5 6-10 11-19 ≥ 20

COMMENTS

PO

STS

BLOG

Page 37: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

RIGHTS & USE

Creative

Commons (n=13)

Copyright

Statement(n=34)

%

feature 1 or more

statements or licenses

BLOG

Page 38: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

%

DISCLAIMERS

have an explicit or implicit

disclaimer-style statement

Own

opinion

Not

responsible

Advice

BLOG

Page 39: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

%

COMMENT POLICY

have an explicit or implicit

comment policy or guidelines

Moderation

Tone &

language

Copyright &

licenses

BLOG

Page 40: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

%

EDITING

edit posts after publication

BLOGGER

Page 41: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

… only 2 blogs included

a policy or statement

BLOG

Page 42: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

Public 100%

Subject to

critical

review 68%

Allows use and

exchange 94%Scholarly

record

80%

66% agree with

all three criteria

Association of Research

Libraries (1986).

Braxton, J.M., Luckey, W.,

& Helland, P. (2002).

SCHOLARSHIP

BLOGGER

Page 43: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

%

… to present

INVITATIONS

BLOGGER

Page 44: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

%

… to collaborate

INVITATIONS

BLOGGER

Page 45: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

%

… to serve

INVITATIONS

BLOGGER

Page 46: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

%

INVITATIONS

… to publish

BLOGGER

Page 47: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

monograph (author)

book chapterpeer-reviewed article

comment (journal)

book review

conference proceedingsessay.article.op-ed (other)

textbook

monograph (editor)

book review (other)

BLOGGER

Page 48: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

SCHOLARY LIFE

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY

RESEARCH CREATIVITY

RESEARCH QUALITY

WRITING QUALITY

WRITING EFFICIENCY

SHARING PRE-PUBS

TEACHING QUALITY

WORK ENJOYMENT

GREATER VISIBILITY

PROMOTION

IMPROVED

NEITHER

IMPAIRED

BLOGGER

Page 49: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

%

preservation for public access

& use into the indefinite future

BLOGGER

PRESERVATION

Page 50: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

BLOGGING OVER TIME

About the same 35%

Somewhat more 14%

Somewhat less 25%

A lot less 17%

A lot more 8%

BLOGGER

Page 51: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

if?What

51/48

Page 52: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication
Page 53: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

SADNESS

C’EST LA VIE

RELIEF DOUBT

ANGER

Page 54: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

Devastated,

both emotionally and

professionally.

Pretty

bad.

Very

sad.

SADNESS

C’EST LA VIE

RELIEF DOUBT

ANGER

Page 55: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

SADNESS

C’EST LA VIE

RELIEF DOUBT

ANGER

Mad as hell.

I’d do something

drastic [in response].

Pretty

peeved. Angry

& upset.

Page 56: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

SADNESS

C’EST LA VIE

RELIEF DOUBT

ANGER

I don’t have to

do it anymore. I get half an hour of my

life back.

Page 57: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

SADNESS

C’EST LA VIE

RELIEF DOUBT

ANGER

Not welcomed

but not tragic …

I’d get over it.

Probably

have a drink & forget about it.

Pour another cup

of coffee & get back to work.Drop out …

until something else

comes along.

Page 58: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

SADNESS

C’EST LA VIE

RELIEF DOUBT

ANGER

It would take an

extreme catastrophe.

How would

that happen?

Page 59: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

What’s

59/48

next?

Page 60: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

THANKS TO …Dr. Helen R. Tibbo

Dr. Lynn Silipigni Connaway

Dr. Jeffrey Pomerantz

Paul Jones

Dr. Richard Marciano

Dr. Cal Lee

Dr. Deborah Barreau

Page 61: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

THANKS FOR …Beta Phi Mu 2010 Eugene Garfield Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship

Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS)

School of Library and Information Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Page 62: (June 2011) New Media, Social Scholarship: Scholars’ Perceptions of their Blogs within the System of Scholarly Communication

… AND THANK YOU

CAROLYN HANKEmail: [email protected]

Phone: 514.398.4684

Web: http://ils.unc.edu/~hcarolyn

Slideshow:

QUESTIONS