Jump Around...for data analysis

By Mark Matthews, Owen Precious and Ryan Smith

SPMA 225

Hypothesis?

The longer we jumped the better we jumped!

Methodology and Data Analysis

Video analysis› Kinovea for data collection

Organized data with Microsoft Excel

Results

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 450.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

R² = NaN

R² = 0.16107896746407

Chart Title

Series1Moving average (Series1)Linear (Series1)

Jump Number

Jump Height (m)

RYAN’S GRAPH

Results

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

R² = NaNR² = 0.441227190789366

Chart Title

Series1Moving average (Series1)Linear (Series1)

Jump Number

Jump Height (m)

OWEN’S GRAPH

Support or Reject?

REJECTED

Jump height and jump technique got worse as time progressed due to fatigue of the jumpers

Source of Error

Our jumping› Not all jumps were done properly

Preparation› Proper jumping attire, out of shape

jumpers, and poor time management Commentary

› Jokes distracted jumper, had to stop and laugh

What could we do Better

Nothing at all, we are perfect! Better prepared

› Better clothes› Stretch

Take it more seriously › No Jokes!

Conclusion

We jumped We got tired

› Lost height› Lost technique› Laughed, cried

Hypothesis rejected

Questions?