Judy Wilyman's PHD Thesis Summary -...
Transcript of Judy Wilyman's PHD Thesis Summary -...
A Summary of the MainArguments in Judy
Wilyman's PhD Thesisthat investigated
the Control of InfectiousDiseases in Australia
Dr Judy Wilyman PhD
Vaccination Decisions
www.vaccinationdecisions.net
Involuntary Medications ObjectorsParty (IMOP)
WA Senate Candidate
References
1. Wilyman J. 2015, A Critical Analysis of the
Australian Government’s Rational for its
Vaccination Policies, University of Wollongong.
[Available from
https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/4541/]
2. Comments by the Prominent Public Health
Officials of the Twentieth Century
https://www.vaccinationdecisions.net/wp-
content/uploads/2014/02/Comments-by-Public-
Health-Officials-1900-2000-1409061.pdf
3. Stamatikis E. Weiler R, Ioannidis J. 2013.
Undue industry influences that distort healthcare
research, strategy, expenditure and practice: a
review. European Journal of Clinical
Investigation. 43: 5(May): pp469-475.
https://www.vaccinationdecisions.net/wp-
content/uploads/2014/02/Stamatakis-13-1-
industry-influence.pdf
4. Engdahl FW. 2015. Shocking Report from
Medical Insiders. NSNBC International On-line.
June 19
http://nsnbc.me/2015/06/19/shocking-report-
from-medical-insiders/ (accessed 17 April 2019)
Dr. Judy Wilyman’sPhD ThesisSummary
Authorised by Michael O'Neill, Involuntary Medication
Objectors (Vaccination/Fluoride) Party,
1800 Nulla Nulla Creek Rd, Bellbrook NSW 2440 Australia
Printed by imoparty.com
Australia’s vaccination policies have been
designed from the recommendations provided by
the World Health Organisation (WHO) under
Global Health Policies. The WHO receives these
recommendations from an advisory group called
the Global Alliance for Vaccines and
Immunisation (GAVI). This alliance includes the
Federation of Pharmaceutical Companies, the
International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, the
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the
Rockefeller Foundation and many more private
and public organisations, all with equal input into
global health policies.
The GAVI alliance cannot provide objective
advice about disease control because many
of these private organisations profit from the
vaccines they recommend to the WHO.
Specifically, the GAVI alliance’s
recommendations to the WHO do not consider the
diversity of genetics in the population or the
special ecological conditions that vary between
all the WHO member countries – two important
factors in the causality of disease.
The WHO recommendations for vaccines are a
one-size fits all and this fact means that these
policies will increase diseases in all populations.
They cannot be described as ‘protective health
policies’ because they contradict the science of
epigenetics; the science showing that individuals
are pre-disposed to diseases due to their genetic
make-up and the interaction with chemicals in
the vaccines.
0 2
The significant decline in deaths and illnesses
from infectious diseases in Australia occurred
before the introduction of vaccines in mass
vaccination programs. It is recognised by all the
prominent public health officials of the twentieth
century that the risk from infectious diseases was
reduced significantly before the majority of
vaccines were developed [2]. This indicates
that mass vaccination was not the main factor
in controlling infectious diseases.
0 1
The majority of the research on vaccine safety
and efficacy that is used by government
regulators and advisory boards is carried out or
sponsored by pharmaceutical companies. These
are the companies that profit from selling
vaccines. In addition most representatives on
vaccine advisory boards have financial conflicts
of interests with pharmaceutical companies.
Research has shown that conflicts of interest in
vaccine research and on vaccine advisory boards
can lead to bias in the design of clinical trials
and the conclusions drawn from these studies [3].
It has also been proven that much of the industry-
funded science is fraudulent [4].
There are important areas of research relevant to
vaccination policy that have not been performed
but are necessary to make claims of safety and
efficacy about vaccines.
The undone science includes safety studies using
a true inert placebo in the unvaccinated group
for an appropriate time-period – either for single
vaccines or for the combined vaccination
schedule.
The safety of vaccines cannot be verified without
this study and yet this study has never been done.
There is no justification for mandating any
vaccine in government policies without this
scientific evidence. Australians need to demand
a truly independent government vaccine advisory
board (free of COI) to assess the vaccine-
industry funded research before vaccines are
recommended to the community in government
policies.
0 3
0 4
Contrary to the Australian government
and media’s assertions, my PhD thesis
does not ‘oppose immunisation’.
My PhD thesis provides the evidence that
opposes mandatory vaccination for any
infectious disease.
Here is a summary of the four main
critical points regarding the Australian
government’s vaccination policies that I
presented in my PhD thesis [1]:
A SUMMARY OF THE MAINARGUMENTS IN MY PHDTHESIS THATINVESTIGATEDTHE CONTROL OFINFECTIOUS DISEASES INAUSTRALIA