Judgement cum Complianced Report as on Dated 16-Dec-16

Judgement cum Complianced Report as on Dated 03-Jan-19

JudgementSr.No. Judgement DateTitle Subject Compliance ByReceived Date RemarksCompliance DateCaseNo/Branch

For the reasons afore-stated, the appeal is allowed; the order passed by learned Single Judge is set aside and the appellant's writ petition isaccepted with a direction to the authorities to treat her eligible for the post of PGT Biology. In case the appellant, on the basis of her performance in theinterview and overall selection criteria has made to the selection list, she shall be offered appointment within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The appellant in that eventuality shall be entitled to notional seniority from the date candidate lower in merit wasoffered appointment. However, she shall not be paid any arrears of pay.(10) Ordered accordingly

1 Manju Rani v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Consider for the post of PGT Biology

Directorate22-05-2017 Communication made to to HSSC vide No.4/365-12 Co(1) dt.13.12.16

09-03-2017 21-09-2017LPA 1014/15 in CWP No.25889/12Coordination

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into thegrievances unfolded by the petitioners in the legal notice dated 06.03.2018 (P-7) and to decide the same in accordance with law, rules and regulations as well as instructions issued by the Government from time to time and also in view of judgment referred in para 2 of this order, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.However, in case the petitioners still feel aggrieved by any of the order passed by the afore-said authority, they shall be at liberty to have recourseto other remedies available to him under law including to approach this Court

2 Chanderpal & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant the benefit of Selection Grade

Directorate19-06-201826-04-2018 18-10-2018CWP 10152/18HR(G-I)

of 13503-01-2019


Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioners in the legal notice dated 06.03.2018 (P-7) and to decide the same in accordance with law, rules and regulations as well as instructions issued by the Government from time to time and also in view of judgment referred in para 2 of this order, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.However, in case the petitioners still feel aggrieved by any of the order passed by the afore-said authority, they shall be at liberty to have recourseto other remedies available to him under law including to approach this Court

3 Satish Kumar Sharma & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant the benefit for revised pay scale


Having heard learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of in terms of CWP No.2886 of 2018 titled ‘Randhir Singh Vs.State of Haryana & others’ decided on 27.02.2018 involving the same issue.

4 Jagroop Singh v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Prepare and complete the service book and to grant him all consequential benefits such as salary, annual increments etc.alongwith interest @ p.a from the date it became due

Directorate22-06-201826-04-2018 21-08-2018CWP 10238/18HRME-I

Learned counsel for the petitioner is a d v i s e d t o f i l e a d e t a i l e d representation/serve legal notice to the concerned respondent(s) for getting his grievances redressed and in case of non-redressal of his grievance(s), he shall be at liberty to have recourse to the remedies available under law as well as toapproach this Court

5 Balbir Singh v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Selection GradeDirectorate17-07-201826-04-2018

CWP 10278/18HR(G-II)

of 13503-01-2019


In response, learned State counsel submits that claim/grievance of the petitioner shall be re-examined, notwithstanding the impugned orderof his transfer. And appropriate orders, in accordance with law, shall be passed within a period of one week from today. And, if the petitioner is notalready relieved, he shall not be relieved from his original posting, till a decision, as indicated above, is reached.The petition is accordingly disposed of, in the above terms. In the event, the claim/grievance of the petitioner is declined, the respondent authority shall pass a comprehensive order, assigning reasons in support thereof.

6 Pawan Singh Kadian v/sState & Ors.

Reg.TransferDirectorate08-05-201826-04-2018 03-05-2018

CWP 10317/18PGT-IV

The writ petition is allowed in view of thejudgment passed by this Court in CWP No.7626 of 2015 titled as Gurmail Kaur andothers Vs. State of Haryana and anotherdecided on 27.5.2015.

7 Parveen Kumar v/sState & ors.

Reg.Appointment for the post of PGT English

Directorate14-08-2015 Deemed University MatterThe Hon'ble High Court granted stay in LPA No.1215 of 2015 against the order dt.27.05.15 passed in CWP No.7626/15 titled as State of Haryana Vs.Gurmail Kaur

27-05-2015CWP 1040/14PGT-I

I find this to be a fair submission. Keeping in view the plight as portrayed, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this petition with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the said legal notice of the petitioners and pass a speaking order thereon within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Orderedaccordingly.Since the main case has been decided, the pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of.

8 Wazir Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Pay FixationDirectorate14-06-201716-05-2017 13-09-2017

CWP 10476/17Coordination

of 13503-01-2019


In view of the above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority amongst the respondents to take a decision on the legal notice by passing a speaking order declaring the rights of the petitioner for r e g u l a r i z a t i o n , i f a n y , o n non-discriminatory principles and in the light of the earlier orders passed by this Court in relation tosimilar issue in the Education Department concerning part-time workers/sweepers. The department would take into consideration the ordersplaced on file at Annex. P-5 and P-6. Final decision be taken within three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

9 Kohar Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Deemed date of regularization of service


Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.1- Financial Commissioner and Secretary to Govt. of Haryana, Education Department, Haryana Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in representation dated 08.08.2017 (Annexure P-9) and to decide the same in accordance with Rules, Regulations and instructions issued by government from time to time as well as in view of similar order passed by respondents vide order dated 01.05.2017 (P-5), within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.In case, the petitioner still feels aggrieved against any of the order(s) passed by the concerned authority, she shall be at liberty to haverecourse to the other remedies available under law including filing of writ petition.

10 Lalita Taneja (Lect.in.History Retd.) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant the benefit of Stepping up being claimed with the same Scheduled Caste junior teacher in the cadre and further by notional pay fixation and pension revision and other retiral benefits revision with interest

Directorate15-05-201830-04-2018 14-08-2018CWP 10507/18PGT-II

of 13503-01-2019


Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.1- Financial Commissioner and Secretary to Govt. of Haryana, Education Department, Haryana Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in representation dated 15.09.2017 (Annexure P-9) and to decide the same in accordance with Rules, Regulations and instructions issued by government from time to time as well as in view of similar order passed by respondents vide order dated 01.05.2017 (P-5), within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, the petitioner still feels aggrieved against any of the order(s) passed by the concerned authority, he shall be at liberty to haverecourse to the other remedies available under law including filing of writ petition.

11 Ishwar Chand (Lect.in.History) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Stepping up and notional pay fixation


of 13503-01-2019


In sum and substance, the claim of the petitioners in this writ petition is to apply multiplier of 1.86 to the upgraded grade pay/pay-scale as per the formula for pay fixation given in Clause A to Rule 7 of the pay rules notified on 30.12.2008. In short, the petitioners' claim is that they are entitled to step-up their pay at par with their juniors with the applicability of the above-mentioned formula.The above-stated claim has been raised by the petitioners in their legal notice dated 25.01.2017 (P-10) also.In this view of the matter, we dispose of this writ petition without expressing any views on merits, with a direction to the authorities toexamine the claim of the petitioners as contained in the above-mentioned legal notice and decide the same by way of reasoned order within a period of six months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

12 Gurtej Singh v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Step up of payDirectorate08-06-201717-05-2017 07-12-2017

CWP 10588/17PGT-IV


13 Balbir Singh v/sState & ors.

Reg.Appointment for the post of Lect.in Physical Education

Directorate14-08-2015 Deemed University Matter The Hon'ble High Court granted stay in LPA No.1215 of 2015 against the order dt.27.05.15 passed in CWP No.7626/15 titled as Gurmail Kaur Vs. State of Haryana

27-05-2015CWP 1067/14PGT-I

of 13503-01-2019


Consequently, without going into merits what is stated in the petition, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority amongst the respondents to take a decision on the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P-8), dated 12.10.2016, and to decide the samein terms of the judgment of this Court in Neelam Ranis' case (supra), within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy ofthis order.If the petitioners' case is not covered by the aforesaid judgment or any other judgment on the subject, detailed reasons as to why it is notcovered, shall be given in the speaking order to be passed.It is also clarified that in case a speaking order has already been passed giving such detailed reasons, then only a short order need be passedin the present petitioners' case, annexing therewith the detailed order already passed (if any).

14 Deepak & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant Higher Pay Scale


That being so, the petition is disposed of, at this stage, only with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the claim/grievance of the petitioners, as also the legal notice dated 16.02.2018 (Annexure P6), within a period of 3 months from the receipt of certified copy of this order. And pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.Needless to assert, in the event the claim of the petitioners is declined, the respondent-authorities shall pass a comprehensive order assigning reasons in support thereof.

15 Raj Bala & Anr. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Regularization of Service


of 13503-01-2019


That being so, the petition is disposed of, at this stage, only with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the claim/grievance of the petitioner, as also the legal notice dated 25.02.2018(Annexure P7), within a period of 3 months from the receipt of certified copy of this order. And pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.Needless to assert, in the event the claim of the petitioner is declined, the respondent-authorities shall pass a comprehensive order assigning reasons in support thereof.

16 Melo Devi v/sState & Ors.



Perusal of Annexure R-1, it is evident that the petitioner has been denied the monetary benefits from 1988 to 2000 on the promotion post of Lecturer in Commerce. The concerned respondent is hereby directed to calculate difference of pay from 26.9.1988 to 27.6.2000 and disburse the same within a period of three months from today.With the above observations, petition stands disposed of.

17 Anant Ram Singla v/sState & Ors.

Reg.promotion as lect.


A perusal of the afore-referred preliminary fact finding inquiry by the DEO, Rohtak shows recommendation of disciplinary proceedings against the Principal and the TGTs mentioned therein. It is directed that the final decision with regard to the same be taken by the competent Authority expeditiously but not later than one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

18 Yashpal Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Challenge the transfer orders


of 13503-01-2019


In view of the above discussion, this petition is partly allowed; the order/letter dated 23.10.2013 (Annexure P-6) is set aside and a direction is given to the respondents to completely reimburse the medical bills pertaining to the treatment of late Mrs. Ved Prabha Kapur at PGIMER, Chandigarh as indoor and outdoor patient as per instructions/letter dated 28.05.2003(Annexure P-11), which provides for complete reimbursement of indoor and outdoor treatment for chronic disease.

19 Dr.Deepak Kapur v/sState & Ors

Reg.Medical Reimbursement

Directorate08-08-2016 LPA filed by the petitioner and same is fixed for hearing on 13.12.18Sanction issued as per norms

12-07-2016CWP 11214/14HR(G-I)

I find this to be a fair submission. In the circumstances, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.3 to decide thesaid representation by passing a speaking order thereon within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc. Application, if any, also stands disposed of.

20 Harish Kumar v/sState & Ors.

Reg. Grant him seniority alongwith monetary benefits as due with interest

Directorate19-06-2017 Letter written to DEO for compliance.Reminder also issued

22-05-2017 18-09-2017CWP 11233/17PGT-II

of 13503-01-2019


Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, theinstant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.1-FinancialCommissioner and Secretary to Govt. of Haryana, Education Department,Haryana Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in representation dated 15.06.2017 (Annexure P-9) and to decide the same in accordance with Rules, Regulations and instructions issued by government from time to time as well as in view of similar order passed by respondents vide order dated 01.05.2017 (P-5 and P-6), within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, the petitioner still feels aggrieved against any of the order(s) passed by the concerned authority, he shall be at liberty to haverecourse to the other remedies available under law including filing of writ petition

21 Mangal Singh (Lect.in.History) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Step up & notional pay fixation


of 13503-01-2019


Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.1-FinancialCommissioner and Secretary to Govt. of Haryana, Education Department, Haryana Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in representation dated 15.06.2017 (Annexure P-9) and to decidethe same in accordance with Rules, Regulations and instructions issued by government from time to time as well as in view of similar order passed by respondents vide order dated 01.05.2017 (P-5 and P-6), within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, the petitioner still feels aggrieved against any of the order(s) passed by the concerned authority, he shall be at liberty to haverecourse to the other remedies available under law including filing of writ petition

22 Mangal Singh (Lect.in.History) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Step up & notional pay fixation


Accordingly, the present writ petition is allowed anddirection is issued to respondent No.2 to issue the required enrolment number on the request of respondent No.3 dated 09.02.2011 (Annexure R-3/A) and declare the result of the petitioner.Needful be done within a period of one month from the receipt of the certified copy of this order

23 Jyoti Ahlawat v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Allow to appear in the 4th semester of D.Ed course

Directorate07-12-201504-11-2015 06-01-2016CWP 11576/12T.Edu. Cell

of 13503-01-2019


In the light of afore-said facts and circumstances but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, instant petition is disposed ofwith a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in his representation dated 13.07.2017 (P-9) and to take a conscious decision by passing a speaking order considering all the facts narrated in the aforesaid representation within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.However, if petitioner still feels aggrieved by any of the orders passed by the aforesaid authority, he shall be at liberty to have recourse to otherremedies available to him under law including to approach this Court.

24 Ram Kumar (Lect.in History) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant notional seniority

Directorate21-05-201809-05-2018 20-08-2018CWP 11619/18PGT-I

Accordingly, Annexures P-6 and P-9 are set aside. Concerned respondent is hereby directed to re-consider the petitioner's claim for selection and appointment to the post of Head Master notionally within a period of three months from today.Petition stands allowed accordingly.

25 Shiv Charan v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Appointment as H.M

Directorate28-07-2017 LPA No.1943/17 has been filed by HSSC and same is fixed for 27.02.18

02-06-2017 01-09-2017CWP 11692/02HR(G-II)

Learned State counsel submits that the claim/grievance of the petitioners as also their legal notice, dated 14.02.2018 (Annexure P-10), shall beconsidered and dealt with within a period of eight weeks from today. And appropriate orders, in accordance with law, shall be passed.The petition is accordingly disposed of, in the above terms. However, in the event the claim of the petitioners is declined, the respondent authorities shall pass a comprehensive order assigning reasons in support thereof.

26 Raj Kumar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Benefit of Selection Grade


of 13503-01-2019


The petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to objectively consider the legal notice dated 7.2.2018 (Annexure P-5) and pass a speaking order therein within a period of fourweeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

27 Naresh Kumar & Ors. v/sState & Ors

Reg.Regularization of service


Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to consider the grievances unfolded by the petitioners in the legal notice dated 28.02.2018 (P-14) and to take a conscious decision by passing a speaking order as per the judmgents referred to above in para no.1 of this order, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case, petitioners still feel aggrieved by any of the orders passed by theaforesaid authority, they shall be at liberty to have recourse to the other remedies available under law as well as to approach this Court.

28 Sher Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Refixation of pay after restoring the benefits of adhoc relief and DA cut as on 01.04.79

Directorate07-06-201810-05-2018 06-09-2018CWP 11783/18HR(G-II)

of 13503-01-2019


The petitioner is entitled to give his salary particulars from the date of his termination of service till the age of superannuation and send a communication through a registered post making a demand for the amount which is due and payable with a copy mark to the State functionary as well. On such receipt, the respondent-Management shall pay the amount after satisfying itself about the correctness ofthe minimum scale applicable. The amounts shall be released with interest at 9% from the respective date when they fell due till thedate of payment. The State shall also ensure that the amount is duly released within the period as stipulated and secure compliance report from the school. The State shall also be at liberty to take a p p r o p r i a t e a c t i o n f o r t h e misappropriation of funds that is clearly evident from the facts disclosed in this writ petition. It shall also be ensured thatif the amounts are not paid, appropriate action as provided under the Act for non-compliance of direction of statutory breach is takenagainst the management.7. Both the writ petitions are ordered as above.

29 Girwar Singh v/sState & Ors.

Quashing of termination order passed by Management

Directorate23-08-2013 The full payment of salary of the petitioner is to be made by the management. No action regarding the payment is required to be taken by the department. Earlier an LPA No.2024/15 was filed by the management which was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate application before the Ld. Single judge. Accordingly CM No.1853/15 in CWP No.4750/91 has been filed by the management. The case is fixed for hearing on 02.11.18

19-07-2013CWP 11869/00HR(AS)

The writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.1 to decide the legal notice (Annexure P-10), and pass speaking order thereupon, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

30 Kashmir Singh Suhag & Ors. v/sState & Ors.



of 13503-01-2019


Be that as it may, once it is accepted that the facts of the present case are covered by Subhash Chand's case (supra), the present writ petition is disposed of in the same terms.Since the main case has been decided, the pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of.

31 Shri Bhagwan v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Consider for the post of PGT Hindi

Directorate07-09-2015 The Hon'ble High Court granted stay in LPA No.1220 of 2015 against the order dt.04.06.15 passed in CWP No.5781/15 titled as Subhash Chand Vs. State of Haryana

30-07-2015CWP 11940/15PGT-I

Counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submits that the writ petition itself may be directed to be treated as a representation of the petitioner and a direction may be issued to the respondents to consider the representation and pass an appropriate orders within the time frame fixed by this Court. In view of the above limited prayer sought for by the counsel for the petitioner, the respondents are directed to treat the writ petition itself as representation of the petitioner-institution and dispose it within two months from the date of receipt of the order. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.

32 Geeta vVidya Mandir School, Shahbad, Markanda v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Quashing the letter dt.21.3.16 (Annexure P+8) wherein direction has been issued by respondent No.3, not to make any admission from the Academic Session 2016-17

Directorate22-07-2016 First Land is be provided by M.C shahabad to the school. Report awaited and reminder also has been issued on 06.06.17 to Director Urban Local Bodies and DEO Kurukshetra.

Management of the school has not provide the reply of lease deed till now

28-06-2016 21-09-2016CWP 11976/16HR(PS)

of 13503-01-2019


For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.10273 of 2010 (Modern Hind Senior Secondary School, village Khori Lalan, Tauru, District Mewat Vs. State of Haryana and others, decided on October 18,2012.

ORDER OF CWP NO.10273 OF 2010

The students, who have been admitted without any fault on their part, cannot be made to suffer for this illegal action of thepetitioner schools. Accordingly, their result which has been declared is ordered to be regularised but this is no reason to permit thepetitioner schools to escape responsibility for this action which is required to be curbed so as to avoid its reoccurrence in future by anyInstitution. The case, thus, is made out to burden the petitioners-Institutions with costs of `6,000/- per students admitted by petitioner -institutions in those classes for which the petitioner-institutions did not have recognition or affiliation from the competent authority as is required by the statute. Half of the cost imposed shall be deposited inthe accounts of Legal Services Authority, Haryana and the remaining half shall be deposited in the Medication and Conciliation Cell functioning in this Court. The writ petitions otherwise are disposed ofwith the above directions.The copy of the order be sent to the Director, SchoolEducation, Haryana, for ensuring compliance of the order. The copy be also forwarded to the Advocate General, Haryana to ensure that the orders are properly complied with and implemented to recover the costs/damages and these are deposited in the appropriate

33 Saraswati Vidya Mandir Sr.Sec.School Siha v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Permanent Recognition

Directorate29-11-2012 Matter is being re-examined with regard to be students admitted by the schools. Report has been received-Inquiry Officer-pointed out schools in following manners:-(i)Those who paid the fine(ii)Those who had not paid the fine.(iii)those who paid the partly Letters/Reminders have been prepared but not issued yet because inquiry report is not complete regarding some schools

18-10-2012CWP 12151/11HR(PS)

of 13503-01-2019


head as directed above.

For orders, see the detailed order of even date passed in CWP-13344-2015 ‘Anant Pal and others vs. The State of Haryana and another’.

34 Balbir Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Promotion for the post of Headmaster High School

Directorate04-04-2018 LPA is being filed. A.G.Haryana raised some objections in draft of LPA

18-12-2017CWP 12234/17PGT-II

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioners in the legal notice dated 12.03.2018 (P-22) and to take a conscious decision by passing a speaking order considering all the facts narrated in the aforesaid legal notice (P-22),within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. However, if petitioners still feel aggrieved by any of the orders passed by the aforesaid authority, they shall be at liberty to have recourse to the other remedies available under law as well as to approach this Court.

35 Brahm Prakash & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant the pay scale of 1600-2900 w.e.f.01.01.96 instead of 1400-2600 and pay scale of 2000-3500 from 24.1194 instead of 2000-3000. As the junior were getting the higer pay scale with all consequential benefits onwards and entire arrears also be released alongwith the interest@18%p.a

Directorate24-05-201816-05-2018 23-09-2018CWP 12283/18Coordination

In view of the above discussion, the impugned show cause notice dated 27.05.2015/29.02.2015 (Annexure P-7) is set aside. However, a liberty is granted to the respondents to proceed further and pass fresh order after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as per law. I(n case, any enquiry has to be conducted, the enquiry report should be made available before giving any fresh show cause notice to the petitioner. It is also made clear that in case, any adverse order is passed against the petitioner, he will be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy.Allowed in the aforesaid terms.

36 Ravi Kumar v/sState & Ors.

Reg. Disciplinary Proceeding against the petitioner for providing bogus experience certificate of Hindi Teacher

Directorate10-08-2016 Sh.Roshan Lal, Retd. HCS has been appointed for conduct inquiry. The inquiry report is put up to Higher Authority.A photocopy of the Enquiry Report sent to the applicant on 30.05.17 and asked the petitioner for submit his reply. Reply received and file put up for show cause notice

02-05-2016CWP 12527/15HR(G-II)

of 13503-01-2019


For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.7626of 2015 (Gurmail Kaur & others VersusState of Haryana & another), decided on27.5.2015.

37 Kulwant Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Consider for the post of PGT


30-06-2015CWP 12697/15PGT-I

The writ petition is allowed in terms ofjudgment rendered by this Court in CWP No. 5781 of 2015 decided on 4.6.2015 titled as Subhash Chand Vs. State of Haryana and others.

38 Parveen Bala v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Consider for the post of PGT Economics

Directorate23-07-2015 Deemed University Matter The Hon'ble High Court granted stay in LPA No.1220 of 2015 against the order dt.04.06.15 passed in CWP No.5781/15 titled as Subhash Chand Vs. State of Haryana

02-07-2015CWP 12849/15PGT-I

The writ petition is allowed in terms of judgmentrendered by this Court in CWP No. 5781 of 2015 decided on 4.6.2015 titled as Subhash Chand Vs. State of Haryana and others.

39 Meena Devi v/sState & Ors.



02-07-2015CWP 12853/15PGT-I

of 13503-01-2019


For order, see judgment of even date passed in CWP No.25682 of 2014, Arun Singh & others vs. State of Haryana & another.ORDER IN CWP NO.25682/14Resultantly, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioners would be entitled for appointment against the vacant seats which were neverconsumed being in the zone of consideration and accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed. The petitioners shall be offered appointment lettersand the State should operate the merit list in the respective categories in the subjects of English, Hindi, and Biology. In case there are persons senior in merit than the petitioners, they will firstly be offered the said posts and in case the vacancies still exist, the petitioners will be accommodated. Thenecessary exercise be concluded within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the judgment.

40 Ritu Rani v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Appointment/Selection for the post of PGT Hindi



41 Jagrati Lunial v/sState & Ors.



02-07-2015CWP 12906/15PGT-I

of 13503-01-2019



42 Banke Behari v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Consider for the post of PGTHindi


02-07-2015CWP 12936/15PGT-I


43 Anita Rani v/sState & Ors.



02-07-2015CWP 12937/15PGT-I


44 Vijay Kumari v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Consider for the post of PGT English


02-07-2015CWP 12947/15PGT-I

of 13503-01-2019


Consequently, the present petition is disposed of in the same terms as order Annexure P-6. The petitioners are entitled to 38 months arrears as well prior to filing of the present petition. The respondentsare directed to release the amount/s due to the petitioners within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, failing which, the petitioners would be entitled to interest @ 12% per annum from the date/s the amount/s fell due.Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Miscellaneous Application, if any, also stands disposed of.

45 Jasbir Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant all benefits of such merger including seniority, avenue of promotion, parity in pay scales etc.

Directorate25-04-2017 File sent to F.D02-02-2017 24-07-2017CWP 12973/05Coordination

In view of the nature of the order being passed, there is no necessity to seek written statement.The writ petition is disposed with direction to respondent No.2 to objectively consider the legal notice dated 21.02.2018 (Annexure P-5) and topass a speaking order thereupon, within a period of eight months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

46 Naresh Kumar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Deemed date of regularization


of 13503-01-2019


The petitioner, who is a teacher and resident of District Sirsa, has filed this petition challenging the decision of the State Government to close down Block Institutes for Teacher Education (BITE) at Ambala andSirsa, with effect from 30.06.2015. In this regard, the petitioner has also submitted a detailed representation dated 19.06.2015 to the Chief Secretary to the Government of Haryana, copy of which has been annexed with the petition as Annexure P-22.After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, without issuing notice of motion as it will un-necessary delay the matter, we deem it appropriate to dispose of this petition with a direction to the Chief Secretaryto Government of Haryana, to consider and decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, keeping in view the needs of the area.Ordered accordingly.

47 Kartar Singh v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Closing of Block Institutes of Teacher Education

Directorate20-07-201503-07-2015CWP 13064/15T.Edu. Cell

The writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2, to consider the legal notice dated 15.02.2018 (Annexures P-9) and pass a speakingorder thereupon within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

48 Lichhma Devi v/sState & Os.

Reg.Regularization of Service w.e.f. 01.04.11 as the date of the juniors alongwith all the consequential benefits including arrear


of 13503-01-2019


Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case but considering the afore-said aspects that the respondents are already seisin of thematter, instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondents to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioners in representation 17.04.2017 (Annexure P-14) and to decide the same in accordance with law, rules and regulations as well as in view of the judgments mentioned in para 1 of this order, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, the petitioners still feel aggrieved against any of the order(s) passed by the concerned authority, they shall be at liberty to have recourse to the other remedies available under law including filing of writ petition.

49 Ramesh Chand Arya & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant pay scale to the petitioner at par admissible in Kurukshetra University

Directorate14-08-2018 Draft of speaking order is under process for vetting

30-07-2018 13-02-2019CWP 13274/18Sec.

The petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2, to objectively consider the Legal Notice dated 16.02.2018 (Annexure P-7) and pass aspeaking order thereupon, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order

50 Dharma Devi v/sState & Ors.




51 Hardhyan Singh & Anr. v/sState & Ors.



07-07-2015CWP 13339/15PGT-I

of 13503-01-2019


Thus, if a TGT (History) seeks promotion as a PGT (History) and has two years teaching experience in the said subject, as also a post graduate degree inHistory, she/he would be eligible to be promoted as such PGT immediately, provided thereafter she/he clears the HTET/SLET/SET within 4 years ofpromotion, failing which she/he shall be reverted to the post of a TGT.With the aforesaid directions, these petitions are disposed of. No order as to costs.

52 Anant Pal v/sState & Ors.

Reg.PromotionDirectorate04-04-2018 LPA is being filed.

A.G.Haryana raised some objections in draft of LPA

18-12-2017CWP 13344/15PGT-II

The present petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to decide the legal notice dated 16.02.2018 by passing a speaking order after hearing the petitioners with regard to the claim for antedated regularization. The decision be taken within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order.With this direction, the petition stands disposed of.

53 Surti Devi v/sState & Ors.



In these circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed at this stage. However, the competent authority amongst the respondents are directed to look into the representations/legal notices of the petitioners as also the representation sent by the Haryana State Lecturers’ Association and take such suitable action on them as is deemed fit and proper for which petitioners and Haryana State Lecturers’ Association deserve to be heard and conveyed a decision thereon within a reasonable time.

54 Virender Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Promotion for the post of Headmaster

Directorate03-08-201809-07-2018CWP 13475/18HR(G-II)

of 13503-01-2019


For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.7626of 2015 (Gurmail Kaur & others Versus State of Haryana & another), decided on 27.5.2015.

55 Manju Lata v/sState & Ors.



09-07-2015CWP 13521/15PGT-I

It is apparent from the facts as mentioned above that there was no fault on the part of the petitioner and the petitioner has been harassed by sending him at different places where post was notvacant. The absence from duty cannot be attributed to the petitioner in any manner and as such, the present writ petition is allowed and the petitioner is held entitled to the salary for the period, he has been treated as absent from his duties and the respondents are directed to release the salary and to regularize the petitioner for that period.

56 Ravinder Kumar v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Release of Salary with 18% interest alongwith all consequential benefits

Directorate17-09-2015 File submitted to F.D30-07-2015CWP 13544/10PGT-II

The petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2, to objectively consider the Legal Notice dated 25.03.2018 (Annexure P-7) and pass aspeaking order thereupon, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt ofcertified copy of this order.

57 Chameli Devi v/sState & Ors.



The petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.1 to decide the legal notice (Annexure P-10) and pass a speaking order thereupon, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order

58 Dr.Usha Rani & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant Selection Grade w.e.f.01.01.2000


of 13503-01-2019


Short question for consideration in the present petition is whether the petitioner could be promoted to the post of Superintendent w.e.f.26.04.2008 or not? The method of recruitment to the post of Superintendent grade is from Deputy Superintendent grade with 3 years ofexperience. The petitioner is stated to have been promoted to the post of Deputy Superintendent on 27.04.2005. He would be completing 3 years of service as Deputy Superintendent on 26.04.2008. However, it is to be noted that on 29.09.2006 itself Superintendent post was available. Consequently, the petitioner was promoted to the post of Superintendent on his own payscale (Deputy Superintendent). For want of experience qualification of 3 years in the Deputy Superintendent between 29.09.2006 to 21.04.2011, the petitioner has not been displaced from the post of Superintendent. In other words, the petitioner continued to hold the post of Superintendent between 29.09.2006 to 21.04.2011. Therefore, the date of promotion to the post of Superintendent is required to be rectified from 21.04.2011 to 26.04.2008, the date on which the petitioner has completed 3 years of service in the cadre of Deputy Superintendent for the purpose of promotion to the post of Superintendent. Accordingly, the competent authority is hereby directed torectify the date of promotion to the post of Superintendent from 21.04.2011 to 26.04.2008 and further extend the consequential benefits including the monetary benefits from 26.04.2008 in the cadre of Superintendent.6. Above exercise shall be completed by the concerned respondent within a period of 3

59 Virender Singh v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Pay Scale w.e.f 27.04.08 instead of 21.04.11

Directorate08-06-2017 LPA filed and same is fixed for 19.09.18

20-04-2017 19-07-2017CWP 1368/12HRME-II

of 13503-01-2019


months from today.7. CWP stands allowed.

The present writ petition is allowed, in terms of order dated 27.05.2015 passed in CWP No.7626 of 2015 titled as Gurmail Kaur and others vs. State of Haryana and another.

60 Anindita v/sState & Ors.


Directorate26-08-2015 Deemed University Matter The Hon'ble High Court granted stay in LPA No.1215 of 2015 against the order dt.27.05.15 passed in CWP No.7626/15 titled as Gurmail Kaur Vs.State of Haryana

21-07-2015CWP 13774/15PGT-I

The petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No. 2, to objectively consider t h e l e g a l n o t i c e d a t e d 16.01.2018(Annexure P-4) and pass aspeaking order thereupon, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

61 Rajesh Kumar & Anr. v/sState & Ors.



The present writ petition is allowed, in terms of order dated 27.05.2015 passed in CWP No.7626 of 2015 titled as Gurmail Kaur and others vs. State of Haryana and another.

62 Parveen Kumar v/sState & Ors.


Directorate28-07-2015 Deemed University MatterThe Hon'ble High Court granted stay in LPA No.1215 of 2015 against the order dt.27.05.15 passed in CWP No.7626/15 titled as Gurmail Kaur Vs. State of Haryana

21-07-2015CWP 13876/15PGT-I

Keeping in view the prayer made in the petition, the presentpetition is allowed with a direction to the competent authority, toconsider and decide the case of the petitioner, in terms of judgment inLPA No.1169 of 2012 titled as 'State of Haryana and another Vs.Harbans Lal and others', decided on 08.10.2012, by passing aspeaking order, within a period of four months from the date of receiptof a certified copy of this order.14.05.2015

63 Mange Ram Saini v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Retiral BenefitsDirectorate19-06-2015 Recalling order by filing

CM No.10564/15 and same is fixed for hearing on 20.11.15 and Hon'ble Court granted stay stay till the decision of SLP No.38930/15

14-05-2015 18-10-2015CWP 14266/11PEN-II

of 13503-01-2019


Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.1-FinancialCommissioner and Secretary to Govt. of Haryana, Education Department, Haryana Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in representation dated 29.09.2017 (Annexure P-9) and to decide the same in accordance with Rules, Regulations and instructions issued by government from time to time as well as in view of similar order passed byrespondents vide order dated 01.05.2017 (P-5), within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.In case, the petitioner still feels aggrieved against any of the order(s) passed by the concerned authority, she shall be at liberty to have recourse to the other remedies available under law including filing of writ petition.

64 Shakuntla Arora (Lect.in.History Retd.) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Same cadre and stepping up benefit being claimed with the same scheduled caste junior teacher in the cadre and further by notional pay fixation and pension revision and other retiral benefits with interest


The petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to objectively consider the legal notice (Annexure P-5) and pass a speaking orderthereupon, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

65 Ramesh Kumar v/sState & Ors.



of 13503-01-2019


This petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the administrative head of Taxation Department, Haryana in the light of theadvisory letter dated 23.8.2016 to take a decision. It is expected that from the date when a representation is made to the State Government through the Principal Secretary, the decision will be taken within three months. However, it will be open to the authority to examine the question of delay as well.

66 OK Play India Limited v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Petitioner filed a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ, direction or order in the nature thereof to the Respondent Nos. 1-.3 directing them to comply with the advice/direction of Respondent No.4 dated 23.08.2016 as annexed herewith as Annexure 12 and/or directing the Respondent Nos.1-3 to refund/reimburse all payments due to the petitioner as set out in Annexure-14.

Directorate21-08-201810-07-2018CWP 14620/18A&A

Instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioners in the legal notice dated 16.05.2018 (P-10) and to take a conscious decision by passing a speaking order particularly in the light of the judgment rendered in Jagat Singh Yadav's case (supra), within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. However, if petitioners still feel aggrieved by any of the orders passed by the aforesaid authority, they shall be at liberty to have recourse to the other remedies available under law as well as to approach this Court.

67 Ranbir Singh v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Selection GradeDirectorate12-06-201801-06-2018 11-09-2018

CWP 14800/18PGT-IV

of 13503-01-2019


The writ petition is disposed of with a direction torespondent No. 2 to objectively consider the legal notice dated 29.3.2018 (Annexure P-4), by passing a speaking order thereupon, within a period offour weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order

68 Garima Sharma v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Appointment for the post of PGT


Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in the legal notice dated 15.03.2018 (P-4) and to take a conscious decision by passing a speaking order, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certifiedcopy of this order. However, if petitioner still feels aggrieved by any of the orders passed by the aforesaid authority, he shall be at liberty to approach this Court.

69 Bhagwan Dass v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Counting Seniority w.e.f. 1991

Directorate31-08-201814-08-2018 30-12-2018CWP 14915/18PEN-II


70 Jaspal Singh v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Consider for teh post of PGT Hindi

Directorate30-09-2015 The Hon'ble High Court granted stay in LPA No.1220 of 2015 against the order dt.04.06.15 passed in CWP No.5781/15 titled as Subhash Chand Vs.State of Haryana

24-07-2015CWP 14953/15PGT-I

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the respondents are directed to consider and decide the legal notice dated 1.3.2018 (Annexure P-5) within a period of eight weeks from the date ofreceipt of certified copy of this order.The petition stands disposed of with the above directions.

71 Chajju Ram & Ors. v/sState & Ors.



of 13503-01-2019


Petitioner's grievance is relating to promotion to the post of Principal in HES-II Cadre. Petitioner's name was not considered for promotion on 20.7.2007 for want of service records. In this regard, respondent-Department have stated in their reply statement that they have asked for annual confidential report of the petitioner from the Chandigarh Administration since petitioner was on deputation as on 25.7.2007.Whereas, the Chandigarh Administration have disputed the communication dated 25.7.2007 stating that no such letter has been received by the office of Chandigarh Administration or concerned Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Sector 35-D, Chandigarh. Petitioner is stated to have attained age of superannuation and retired from service. In view of the above facts and c i r c u m s t a n c e s S t a t e Government-Commissioner and Secretary to Government of Haryana Education Department is hereby directed to set right the petitioner's service record and consider petitioner's name for promotion to the post of Principal in HES-II Cadre for officiating capacity from 20.7.2007 and extend all service benefits including monetarybenefits during the intervening period from 20.07.2007 till petitioner attains age of superannuation and retired from service. The above exercise shall be completed within a period of 3 months from today.Accordingly, petition stands disposed of.

72 Shanta Kumari Narang v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Promotion for the post of Principal

Directorate03-08-2017 LPA has been filed02-06-2017 01-09-2017CWP 15072/13HR(G-I)

of 13503-01-2019


Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case but considering the afore-said aspects, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No. 2 and 3 to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in the legal notice dated 15.02.2018 (P-5) and to take a conscious decision in accordance with law, rules, regulations and instructions issued by the Government from time to time, within a period of three months from thedate of receipt of a certified copy of this order. However, if petitioner still feels aggrieved by any of the orders passed by the aforesaid authority, he shall be at liberty to have recourse to other remedies available under law including to approach this Court.

73 Maha Singh v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Count previous part time service for the purpose of pensionary benefits



74 Rajesh Kumar v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Consider for the post of PGT Physics


27-05-2015CWP 1556/14PGT-I

In view of the aforesaid submissions and prayer made by the petitioner, respondent No.2 is directed to decide the prayer of the petitioner, which is still pending with it, having been sent by respondent No.3, within a period of seven days from the date ofreceipt of certified copy of this order by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Disposed of.

75 Sri Hari Krishan Education Society v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Permission for D.Ed Courses


of 13503-01-2019


The present writ petition is allowed, in terms of judgment dated 04.06.2015 rendered in CWP No.5781 of 2015 titled as Subhash Chand vs. State of Haryana and others.

76 Seema v/sState & Ors.



31-07-2015CWP 15605/15PGT-I

Though the permission, if any granted by the Competent Authority for joining LLB degree is not on record, nevertheless, we are ofthe considered view that transfer being an incidence of service, learned Single Judge has rightly declined to interfere with the same. However, the appellant may approach the Competent Authority and make out a case basedupon the mitigating circumstances, including the utility of LLB degree with reference to the nature of duties he is required to perform. We have noreason to doubt that the Competent Authority shall sympathetically consider the appellant's request. It shall be appreciated if the decision is taken within a period of one month from the date of making a request by the appellant.Ordered accordingly.

77 Sunil Kumar v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Transfer of Guest Faculty

Directorate19-09-201626-08-2016LPA 1561/16 in CWP No.16274/16PGT-II

In my opinion, it would be appropriate if the present writ petition is treated as representation and respondent No.2 decides the same by passing speaking order within two months from today.Ordered accordingly. However, it is made clear that till the passing of the speaking order, recovery shall not be made from the petitioners.Disposed of accordingly.Copy of this order be given dasti to the learned State counsel under the signatures of Reader/Bench Secretary.

78 Om Parkash & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Refixation/ACPDirectorate06-02-2017 Speaking orders are

being passed30-01-2017 29-03-2017

CWP 1567/17PGT-IV

of 13503-01-2019


Consequently, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority amongst the respondents to take a decision on the legalnotice of the petitioners (Annexure P-6), dated 22.11.2016, in terms of the judgment of this Court in Neelam Rani (supra) within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.If the petitioners' case is not covered by the aforesaid judgment or any other judgment on the subject, detailed reasons as to why it is notcovered, shall be given in the speaking order to be passed.It is also clarified that in case a speaking order has already been passed giving such detailed reasons, then only a short order need be passed now, annexing therewith detailed order already passed (if any).

79 Pinki & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Step-up of their pay


After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, however, without opining on the merits of the controversy, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to take a final decision on the show cause notices issued to the petitioners, to which theyhave already filed replies, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of the order.

80 Surinder Kaur & Anr. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Consider for the post of PGT Punjabi & Mathematics

Directorate10-02-2015 13/24-15 HRL-I(4)Report from DVC awaited

29-01-2015 09-04-2015CWP 1573/15PGT-I


81 Purushotam Dutt v/sState & Ors



18-12-2017CWP 15850/15PGT-II

of 13503-01-2019


The matter is remanded to the disciplinary authority to proceed afresh in the matter. Needful be done withing three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order after applying report dated 02.05.12 and after affording an opportunity to the appellant to move representation, if any. Disciplinary authority would proceed to decide the matter afresh and would determine the outcome of the action, if any, to be taken against the appellant.Appeal is allowed in aforementioned terms.

82 Maman Singh v/sState & Ors.

Reg Intrest @ 18% p.a on unpaid/delayed payment of leave encashment, gratuity and commuted value of pension

Directorate19-07-2018 File put up to W.ACSSE14-03-2018 18-10-2018LPA 1587/15 in CWP No.22188/14HR(G-I)

The present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to consider and decide the legal notice (Annex.P-4) by passing an appropriate order after hearing the petitioners.Let the exercise be completed within a period of twomonths from the date of receiving of a certified copy of this order.

83 Ombir & Anr. v/sState & Ors.



The present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to consider and decide the representations and legal notice (Annex. P-6 & P-7) by passing an appropriate order after hearing the petitioner.Let the exercise be completed within a period of twomonths from the date of receiving of a certified copy of this order.

84 Lilu Ram v/sState & Ors.



of 13503-01-2019


This court feels that another opportunity needs to be granted to the concerned officer to decide the representation and to purge the contempt.He may take a decision on the representation within one month from today.In case needful is not done, petitioner shall be at liberty to seek revival of the petition. In that eventuality, this court shall consider imposition of punitive costs. Same shall be deductible from the salary of the o f f i c e r ( s ) r e s p o n s i b l e f o r non-compliance/delay.Disposed of.

85 Namrata Kumari (Lect.in.Sociology) v/sSmt.Dheera Khandelwal, IAS


COCP 1593/18 in CWP No.8584/18PGT-II

Consequently, the present petition is disposed of in the same terms as order Annexure P-5. The petitioners are entitled to 38 months arrears as well prior to filing of the present petition. The respondentsare directed to release the amount/s due to the petitioners within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order,failing which, the petitioners would be entitled to interest @ 12% per annum from the date/s the amount/s fell due.Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Miscellaneous Application, if any, also stands disposed of.

86 Dilawar Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.


Directorate25-04-2017 File sent to F.D02-02-2017 24-07-2017CWP 15967/05Coordination

of 13503-01-2019


Concerned respondents are directed to verify the service particulars of the petitioners as well as juniors to the petitioners and if the petitioners are otherwise eligible to the post of Lecturer in Punjabi, their name shall be considered for promotion to the post of Lecturer in Punjabi from the date of juniors' promotion i.e. 24.3.1998. The above exercise shallbe completed within a period of four months from today. Further consequential benefits including monetary benefits i.e. difference of pay shall be extended to the petitioners.Disposed of in the above terms.

87 Amrik Singh v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Promotion for the post of Lecturer in Punjabi


Without making any comments on the legal position, the prayer of the petitioner is accepted to the extent that the orders have been passed without notice and hearing which prejudice the rule ofaudi alteram partem, and, therefore, this petition is allowed to the limited extent that the orders Annex. P-12 & P-13 are quashed and the respondents are directed to pass a fresh order in accordance with law within one month after hearing the petitioner on the representation already filed by him.Disposed of.

88 Satish Kumar v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Pay protection granted to the petitioner in lieu of his past service rendered by him as PGT Hindi with the Kendriya Vidyalaya from 24.06.03 to 27.07.09 has been withdrawn and recovery of arrears has been ordered.


of 13503-01-2019


In the light of what has been discussed above, the petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to consider the bills submitted by thepetitioner in the light of instructions so far it pertains to the period prior to the implementation of Rules 2001 and to consider the other bills within the purview of Rules 2001, within a period of two months and if the concerned authoritycomes to the conclusion that petitioner is entitled to the reimbursement of medical bills or to partial amount thereof, the same shall be calculated anddisbursed to the petitioner within a period of next 1 month. In the event of non-compliance of this order, petitioner shall be entitled to interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of instant petition tillactual payment.

89 Sudesh Sehgal v/sState & Ors.

Directorate05-03-2018 As the main file related to court case is missing. As the petitioner provided the medical bills to the department though Director SCERT & thereafter, we sent the case of petitioner to health department. From then onwards, we are unable to find out these medical bills and when department/concerned dealing approached this petitioner for providing copy of medical bills, she refused to give copy of these medical bills.

16-02-2018 15-04-2018CWP 1610/05HR(G-I)

Counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that the only grievance would be as to whether the petitioner would be entitled for the benefits of promotion for the prior period. He submits that he would file a detailed representation as such with the respondents, who could take into consideration the same and take a decision on the same within a period of three months from the date of the receipt of the said request. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in the above said terms

90 Rani Devi Gupta v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Charge of Principal and DDO power

Directorate08-09-2017 4/87-13 AS(2)However in representation filed by the petitioner in this Directorate in AS Branch & hence no action is to be taken at Directorate level.

28-07-2017 07-12-2017CWP 16277/13HR(AS)

of 13503-01-2019


Smt. Shanti Devi (now deceased) was appointed as a Sweeper with respondent No.3 on 01.03.1971. Her services were terminated on18.04.2000. She raised an industrial dispute and it was decided against her on the score that during pendency of Reference No.688 of 2002 decided by the Labour Court she has died. Thus, legal heir of deceased Smt. Shanti Devi – Narinder Kumar pursued the matter before the Labour Court.However, Labour Court has failed to appreciate the length of service rendered by the deceased employee from 01.03.1971 to 18.4.2000 so as toextend benefit of compensation under the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Thus, feeling aggrieved by the award passed by the Labour Court, presented this petition by legal heir of deceased – Narinder Kumar. Labour Court has failed to appreciate the length of service rendered by the deceased employee as a Sweeper from 01.03.1971 to 18.4.2000. Even though deceased employee died during pendency of the Reference No.688 of 2002, Labour Court should have appreciated length of service for the purpose of extending the benefit of compensation under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Accordingly, award passed by the Labour Court dated 29.12.2010 (Annexure P/5) is set aside. Respondents are directed to pay compensation of ` 6,00,000/- to the legal heir of deceased Smt. Shanti Devi within a period of six months from today, failing which legal heir is entitled to interest @ 6 % per annum on the compensation amount from today.Petition stands allowed.

91 Narinder Kumar v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant due and proper compensation after holding the termination of the deceased work-lady

Directorate20-03-2018 13/214-15ME(3)01-02-2018 19-09-2018CWP 16340/11HRME-I

of 13503-01-2019


Keeping in view the above, the present writ petition is disposed of by giving directions to the respondents No.2 and 3 to look into the representation (Annexure P-9) as per judgment (Annexure P-8) passed by this Court and decide the same preferably within the period of six months.

92 Prithvi Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.


CWP 16347/18HR(G-I)

This petition is disposed of by giving direction to pass appropriate orders on the legal notice dated 25.04.2018 (Annexure P-7) keeping in view the orders passed in favour of the juniors (Annexure P-4) in accordance with law.

93 Subhash Chander & Anr. v/sState & Ors.


Directorate24-07-201810-07-2018CWP 16474/18HRME-I


94 Surender Kumar v/sState & Ors.



18-08-2015CWP 16495/15PGT-I

As the matter in controversy is restricted to that point only and petitioner has already got issued legal notice dated 25.04.2018 (AnnexureP7), present writ petition stands disposed of with the directions to the respondents to look into and take the required action on legal notice(Annexure P7) expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

95 Mukhtyar Singh v/sState & Ors.



This petition is disposed of by giving direction to pass appropriate orders on the legal notice dated 08.05.2018 (Annexure P-5) keeping in view the orders passed in favour of the juniors (Annexure P-4) within a period of 6 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order.

96 Rohtash Kumar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.



of 13503-01-2019


Consequently, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority amongst the respondents herein to take a decision on the aforesaid legal notice, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

97 Kulbhushan Sharma & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant benefit of Selection Grade w.e.f. 01.82000 instead of 01.01.96

Directorate13-09-2017 Claim has been accepted and DEO,s are being directed to release the benefits.

28-07-2017 12-12-2017CWP 16569/17HR(G-I)

Keeping in view that the claimants-Kiran Bala and others have already been compromised the matter by filing the appeal i.e. FAO No.1955 of 1995 before the Lok Adalat on 07.04.1999 by accepting Rs.1,40,000/- over and above as enhanced amount of compensation, the present cross objectionfiled by them is also dismissed.

98 Dharam Pal (Lect.in.Pol.Sci.) v/sState & Ors.



Without making any comment on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority amongst the respondents to decide the legal notice dated 9.11.2017(Annexure P-10) by passing a speaking order after hearing the petitioners or their representatives within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case the benefitis granted, there will be no need to pass a speaking order and the claim can be decided by passing office order. In case an adverse order is proposed then necessity of hearing will arise.

99 Kunwal Pal Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Benefits of selection grade of Rs. 7500-12000 w.e.f. 01.01.96 instead of 01.08.2000


The petitioner may file the application within a period of 4 weeks from today and on the receipt of the comments, the exercise be completed within a period of 3 months, thereafter.With the above said liberty, the present execution application is disposed of.

100 Rajinder Kumar Saroha v/sState & Ors.

Reg.SuspensionDirectorate19-12-201729-11-2017 18-04-2018

Execution 17/12 in CWP No.7978/08HR(AS)

of 13503-01-2019


Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-The Director,Secondary Education, Haryana, Shiksha Sadan, Sector 5, Panchkula to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioners in the legal notice dated 19.06.2018 (P-10) and to take a conscious decision by passing a speaking order in view ofthe judgments referred in the aforesaid legal notice (P-10), within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. However, if petitioners still feel aggrieved by any of the orders passed by the aforesaid authority, they shall be at liberty to have recourse to other remedies available under law as well as to approach this Court.

101 Pushpa Kalra & Ors v/sState & Ors


CWP 17219/18PGT-IV

of 13503-01-2019


In view of the above factual position, the writ petition stands allowed and direction is given to respondent No. 2 to countersign the experiencecertificate of the petitioner dated 01.06.2016 (Annexure P-10) so that the petitioner can participate in the selection process of PGT Sanskrit, pursuant to advertisement dated 28.06.2015

102 Om Pal @ Om Pal Sharma v/sState & Ors.

Reg. Countersign the Experience Certificate of the petitioner dated 01.06.2016 (Annexure P-10) issued by respondent no.6 for teaching as PGT Teacher, in view of facts and circumstance of the present case and also keeping in view the fact that petitioner taught PGT classes. It is further prayed that respondents no.3 be directed to keep a post vacant for the post of PGT (Sanskrti) advertised vide no.4/2015 dt. 28.06.15 during the pendency of present writ petition in the interest of justice

Directorate29-10-201818-09-2018CWP 17221/16PGT-I

This petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the legal notice dated 12.04.2018 (P-3) in accordance with law. The decision be taken expeditiously.

103 Subhash Chander & Ors v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Counting the whole service from deemed date of appointment for qualifying service for pension from 12.04.90, benefit of children allowance, ACP, correct pay fixation and seniority


of 13503-01-2019


Keeping in view the prayer made in the petition, the present petition is allowed with a direction to the competent authority, to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in terms of judgment in LPA No.1169 of 2012 titled as State of Haryana and another Vs. Harbans Lal and others decided on 08.10.2012 by passing a speaking order, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

104 Madan Lal Makkar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Revised Pensionary Benefits

Directorate17-06-2015 Recalling order by filing CM No.11063/15 and same is fixed for hearing on 05.11.15 and Hon'ble Court granted stay till the decision of SLP No.38930/15

14-05-2015 16-10-2015CWP 17329/13PEN-II

In view of the above fact, at this stage, the present petition is disposed of by giving direction to the respondents to look into the representation/legal notices of the petitioner dated 15.03.2018 & 20.05.2018 (Annexures P-11 & P-12) and pass appropriate speaking order(s) in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order

105 Smt.Bimla Devi v/sState & Ors.



For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.7626 of 2015 (Gurmail Kaur & others Versus State of Haryana & another), decided on 27.5.2015.

106 Ravinder Singh v/sState & Ors.



27-05-2015CWP 1760/14PGT-I

Consequently, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority amongst the respondents to take a decision on the aforesaid legal notice of the petitioners, by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

107 Shyam Sunder Ahuja v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Promotion for the post of Principal

Directorate22-09-2017 Matter is under consideration

29-08-2017 21-12-2017CWP 17601/17HR(G-I)

of 13503-01-2019


The Director General School Education will look into this grievance within two or three days from the date of receipt of the order and take a fair and just decision on the representation on this special feature which constitutes the ground of challenge.Disposed of.

108 Dr.Sunil Kumar v/sState & Ors.


CWP 17606/16PGT-II

Consequently, this writ petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to work out arrears and pay the same to the petitioner within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, failing which the petitioner would be entitled to claim the same with interest @ 8% p.a from the date/s the same fell due till the date of payment.

109 Sandeep Kumar & Ors. v/siState & Ors.

Reg.Consequential benefits of promotion including arrears of pay which were payable to the said Sh.Ved Pal Singh

Directorate24-08-2015 LPA No.214/16 has been filed and admitted. To be heard within one year. Stayed the impugned order

02-07-2015 23-11-2015CWP 17719/14HR(G-I)

The Director General School Education will look into this grievance within two or three days from the date of receipt of the order and take a fair and just decision on the representation on this special feature which constitutes the ground of challenge.Disposed of.

110 Pawan Singh v/sState & Ors.


CWP 17743/16PGT-II

Accordingly, instant petition is treated as representation on behalf of the petitioners and is disposed of with a direction to respondent(s) to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioners in the instant petition (representation) and decide the same particularly in view of Government of Haryana Circular dated 24.04.2014 bearing Memo No.10/01/2014-3GSII (Annexure P-1), withina period of 3 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

111 Balbir Singh Sheoran & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant of Additional Increment


of 13503-01-2019


Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2to take decision on the legal notice dated 05.03.2015 (Annexures P-7) issued on behalf of the petitioner by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, preferably within four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner,he would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law.


Reg.Pay FixationDirectorate15-09-2015 13/166-15 HRL-II(3)

File put up to Higher Authority for compliance. Matter under consideration for seniority

31-08-2015 14-01-2016CWP 18183/15PGT-II

Resultantly, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioners would be entitled for appointment against the vacant seats which were neverconsumed being in the zone of consideration and accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed. The petitioners shall be offered appointment lettersand the State should operate the merit list in the respective categories in the subjects of English, Hindi, and Biology. In case there are persons senior in merit than the petitioners, they will firstly be offered the said posts and in case the vacancies still exist, the petitioners will be accommodated. Thenecessary exercise be concluded within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the judgment.

113 Parveen Kumari v/sState & Ors.



of 13503-01-2019



114 Parveen Kumari v/sState & Ors.



of 13503-01-2019



115 Geetu v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Consider for the post of PGT Skt.


In view of all that has been discussed above and in view of ratio laid down by the judgment in the case of Ram Kishan Sharma's case (supra), the prayer of the petitioner could not be rejected on the ground that the application for extension of service was made by the petitioner only one day before retirement. With these observations, this writ petition is being allowed and the respondents are directed to extend the benefit of extensionof service for two years from 58 to 60 years on the ground of physical disability as per Instructions (Annexures P-1 to P-3) with all consequentialbenefits

116 Krishan Chander v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Two year extension in service due to handicapped


of 13503-01-2019


Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Director of Secondary Education Haryana, Panchkula toconsider the case unfolded by the petitioners in legal notice (P-7) and to decide the same in the light of letter dated 12.12.2000 (P-1) as well as judgment passed by this Court in CWP No.8082 of 2001, titled as “R.K. Verma and ors. v. Stateof Haryana and anr.”, decided on 01.12.2010 (P-2), which has attained finality by way of dismissal of LPA, SLP as well as review petition, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.However, if petitioners still feel aggrieved against any order passedby the aforesaid authority, they shall be at liberty to have recourse to the otherremedies available under law as well as to approach this Court.

117 Girdhari Lal & Ors. v/sState & Ors.


CWP 18627/18PGT-IV

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 2 to decide the above issues within a period of 10 days from from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. Needless to say that in case the relief is to be denied, the order should contain reasons.

118 Sarita Jain College Education v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant Permission for D.Ed Course


of 13503-01-2019


Hence, without making any comment on the merits of the contentions made in the petition, it is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority amongst the respondents to take a decision on the aforesaid legal notice of the petitioners (Annexure P-9), dated 25.05.2017,by passing a speaking order within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.Though it is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners' case has never been rejected till date, if any order has however been passed by the respondents already rejecting the petitioners' case and the said rejection is by a detailed speaking order givingreasons for such rejection, then only a short order need be passed now annexing therewith the detailed order already passed (if any).The judgments of this Court on the issue as have been cited in the legal notice, would obviously be looked at by the respondents to see whether the claim of the petitioners is genuine or not in terms of such judgments.

119 Kuldeep Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Selection GradeDirectorate08-09-2017 Claim has been accepted

and DEO,s are being directed to release the benefits.

24-08-2017 07-01-2018CWP 19036/17HR(G-I)

Keeping in view the letter dated 30.10.2017 (Annexure P-8) and order passed by this Court in CWP-16549-2017 (Annexure P-15), this petition is being disposed of by giving direction to respondent No. 2 to immediately allow the petitioners to join their respective stations whether they have been transferred vide order dated 26.03.2018 (Annexure P-4) and this order be complied within a period of two weeks.

120 Jitender Singh & Anr. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Quashing of note 7 of endorsement of order dated 1142017 Annexure P2 Vide which PostGraduate Teachers of Mewat Cadre have not been allowed to be relieved for joining the Sanskriti Model Schools


of 13503-01-2019


Taking into consideration the facts & circumstances of the case in hand, this Court is of the view that grant of interest @ 9% perannum, on the delayed payment after expiry of three months from the date of retirement of the husband of the petitioner till the actual payment, is legally and factually justified. Accordingly, this Court awards an interest @ 9% per annum on the delayed payment(s) w.e.f. March 01, 2013 to actual date of payment. Accordingly, respondents are directed to calculate the interest on the delayed payments reflected in the aforesaid reply within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment and disburse the same within a period of two months thereafter. Disposed of accordingly.

121 Babli v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Revision of Pay Scale


10-11-2017 26-03-2018CWP 19095/15PEN-II

Keeping in view the above and order dated 10.01.2017 (Annexure P-6), the present writ petition is disposed of and respondents aredirected to look into the legal notice dated 25.05.2018 (Annexure P-5) and pass appropriate orders within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of this order in accordance with law.

122 Parmeshwari v/sStaete & ors.



Keeping in view the above and order dated 10.01.2017 (Annexure P-6), the present writ petition is disposed of and respondents aredirected to look into the legal notice dated 22.05.2018 (Annexure P-5) and pass appropriate orders within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of this order in accordance with law.

123 Krishna Devi v/sState & Ors.



of 13503-01-2019


After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners and noticing the grievance as expressed in the petition, we are of the considered view that this petition needs to be disposed of at this stagewith a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners as contained in the legal notice dated 25.04.2017 (Annexure P-10) by passing a speaking order as expeditiously aspossible. Ordered accordingly.

124 Ajit Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Upgraded grade pay or pay scale w.e.f the date of anomaly of revision of scales i.e. 01.01.06

Directorate13-09-201725-08-2017CWP 19186/17PGT-III

Learned State counsel has also raised an argument that under the subsequent 2008 Rules, the cadre of Craft Teacher (Tailoring & Cutting) had been declared as a dying cadre and no fresh appointment is being made in that cadre.In my opinion, the adjustment of the petitioner in terms of Sub Rule 3 of Rule 59 of the Higher Education Rules 2003 would not amount toreviving the cadre.Consequently, the present petition is disposed of in the same terms as passed in that judgment (Annexure A-1).

125 Usha Sabharwal v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Reinstate with all consequential benefits including arrears of salary with 12% interest from date due till the date of payment.

Directorate17-03-2017 Draft of LPA has been prepared by the branch which will be filed shortly

20-02-2017CWP 19437/10HR(AS)

Instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3- Director, Department of Secondary Education, Haryana, Shiksha Bhawan,Sector 5, Panchkula to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioners in legal notice (P-8) and to take a conscious decision, within a period of threemonths from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.. However, if the petitioners still feels aggrieved against any of the order(s) passed by the concerned authority, they shall be at liberty to have recourse to the remedies available under law as well as to approach this Court.

126 Moman Ran Kaushik & Anr. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.ACPDirectorate24-08-201806-08-2018 23-11-2018

CWP 19459/18PGT-IV

of 13503-01-2019


At this stage, the present petition is disposed of by giving direction to the respondent No.2 to look into representation dated 16.04.2018 (Annexure P-6)and legal notice dated 18.05.2018 (Annexure P-7) and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

127 Zile Singh v/sState & Ors.



Learned counsel for the petitioners rightly points out that identical issue arose for consideration before this Court in CWP No.22554 of 2016 titled as Lakhbir Singh and others vs State of Haryana andanother,decided on 27.10.2016.The instant writ petition is also disposed of in the same terms.

128 Brahma Nand & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Quashing the impugned Note-III of Appendix-B (Annexure P-I) dated 11.04.12 and in consequence the substituted provision of corrigendum dt. 01.09.16 (Annexure P-8) being ultra vires to Article 14 of the constitution of India and being unjustified, arbitrary and having no nexus with the ultimate object to be achieved amounting to bad effect of birth marks throughout the life of a candidate

Directorate28-11-2016 File is being put up03-11-2016 27-03-2017CWP 19736/16Coordination

of 13503-01-2019


Learned counsel for the petitioners rightly points out that identical issue arose for consideration before this Court in CWP No.22554 of2016 titled as Lakhbir Singh and others vs State of Haryana and another, decided on 27.10.2016.The instant writ petition is also disposed of in the same terms.

CWP No.22554 of 2016 ORDER

In our considered view, unless the rule is found to be inconsistent with any Constitutional provisions or a Statute or against public policy, it would not be expedient for a Writ Court to interfere with it and assume the role of Rule Making Authority. The amendment, substitution or streamlining of the existing provisions, essentially falls within the purview of Rule Making Authority. It is thus not necessary to express any views on merits, rather we deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.1 to entertain this petition as a representation onbehalf of the petitioners and consider their grievance in accordance with the State policy. It shall be appreciated if an appropriate decision is taken within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. The petitioner shall be required to send a copy of the writ petition alongwith certified copy of this order to respondent No.1.Ordered accordingly.

129 Kuldeep & Ors. v/sState & Ors.



of 13503-01-2019


Keeping in mind the entire factual matrix, in my opinion the appropriate punishment for the petitioner would be compulsory retirement.In the circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner would stand compulsorily retired w.e.f. 10.11.2006. The respondents are directed to compute and pay all his remaining benefits within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, failing which, the petitioner will be entitled to claim the same with interest @ 8% p.a. from the date of entitlement viz. 10.11.2006 till the date/s of payment/s.Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.Since the main case has been decided, the pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of.

130 Mohammad Farooque v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant all consequential benefits

Directorate13-04-2015 SLP filed by the department nd also by the petitioner's Mohamad Farooque SLP CC No.8132/16 Mohamad Farooque Vs. State of Haryana. Vakalatnama & Affidavit submitted in the Haryana Legal Cell on 06.06.16 by hand.SLP fixed for hearing on 25.07.17

03-03-2015 12-07-2015CWP 19928/11HR(AS)

Keeping in view the order dated 26.07.2016 (Annexure P-2) this petition is being disposed by giving direction to the respondents to pass speaking orders on the representations made by the petitioners (Annexues-P-8) within four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order.

131 Rajender Parshad & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Promotion for the post of Headmaster High School from ESHM


of 13503-01-2019


Accordingly, without commenting upon the merits of the case and keeping in view the above, the present writ petition is disposed of witha direction to respondent no.2 to take into consideration the grievance raised in the said representation dated 21.2.2017 (Annexure P/6) and pass an appropriate order within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case any adverse order is to be passed then a reasoned order be passed by the said respondent and copy thereof be supplied to the petitioner.The present writ petition is disposed off with the aforesaid directions.

132 Kuldeep Singh v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Promotion for the post of PGT Mathematics

Directorate26-09-201708-09-2017 25-01-2018CWP 20379/17PGT-III

of 13503-01-2019


Insofar as compulsory retirement and order of reversion decided by the appellate authority vide order dated 02.09.2015 is concerned,order dated 02.09.2015 is set aside. Insofar as order of compulsory retirement dated 09.06.2012 issue is concerned, matter is remanded to the appellate authority – Director, Secondary Education, Haryana for decidingthe appeal of 4th respondent and cross-appeal of the petitioner afresh. The appellate authority is directed to decide the appeal as well as cross-appeal within a period of three months from today. Order of reversion dated 06.06.2011 is set aside. The petitioner is at liberty to take fresh steps if it is warranted by issuing appropriate notice furnishing the details and reasons for reverting respondent No.4. Respondent No.4 is entitled for difference ofpay during the intervening period from 06.06.2011 till passing final order of reversion, if any. Arrears of pay shall be calculated and disbursed to 4th respondents within a period of three months from today.7. Accordingly, instant writ petition stands allowed.

133 Arya Education Society (Regd.) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Reversion from the post of Headmaster to the post of Science Master

Directorate08-06-2017 LPA filed by the Management

10-05-2017 09-08-2017CWP 20457/15HR(AS)

That being so, the petition is disposed of, at this stage, only with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners, as also the legal notice dated 01.11.2017 (Annexure P7) within a period of three months from the receipt of certified copy of this order. And pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. In the event, the claim of the petitioners is declined, the authority shall pass a comprehensive order assigning reasons in support thereof.

134 Jai Parkash & Anr. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Ante dated promotion

Directorate05-03-2018 Compliance to be made by HRG-II branch, report still awaited

01-02-2018 04-06-2018CWP 2059/18HR(G-I)

of 13503-01-2019


Applying the ratio of the above mentioned judgments to the facts of the present case, the present writ petition stands allowed. A direction is given to the respondents to take the date of retirement of the petitioner as 30.09.2017 and she is entitled to consequential benefits alongwith 6% interest.

135 Shakuntala Devi v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Extension in Service

Directorate08-10-201819-07-2018CWP 20637/15PGT-III

this petition, at this stage is being disposed of by giving direction to the respondents to pass a speaking order on the Sugam Sampark Ticket (Aneexure P-3) within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order

136 Sushil Punia v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Correction in Lecturer Seniority List for the purpose of promotion to the post of Principal


Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent(s) to look into thegrievances unfolded by the petitioner in her legal notice (P-4) and to deal with and dispose of the same, in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. If the concerned authoritycomes to the conclusion that petitioner is entitled to the benefits claimed, to release the same within a period of next 45 days.The claim with regard to interest on delayed payment of retiral benefits to the petitioner shall also be considered in view of the observationsmade by Full Bench of this Court in case captioned as “R.S. Randhawa vs. State of Punjab, 1997 (3) RSJ 318 as well as Govt. of Haryana InstructionsNo.1/2(152)01-2FRII, dated 20.02.2002.However, if the petitioner still feels aggrieved against any of the order passed by the concerned authority, she shall be at liberty to approach thisCourt as well as to have recourse to the other remedies available under law.

137 Mamo Devi v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Count previous service for the purpose of pensionary benefits


of 13503-01-2019


In view of the said fact, this petition is disposed of by giving direction to the respondents, especially resondent No.2-Director, SecondaryvEducation, Haryana to look into the representation dated 29.05.2018 (Annexure P-3) and pass appropriate orders keeping in view the seniority list (Annexure P-2), in accordance with law, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

138 Dr.Shayam Sunder Ahuja v/sState & Ors.

Reg.SeniorityDirectorate28-09-201820-08-2018 27-03-2019

CWP 20757/18PGT-II

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2-Director, Secondary Education, Haryana, Shiksha Sadan, Sector 5, Panchkula, District Panchkula to consider the claim of the petitioner put forth by him in legal notice(P-1) and to take a conscious decision, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.However, if the petitioner still feels aggrieved against any of the order passed by the concerned authority, he shall be at liberty to approach thisCourt as well as to have recourse to the other remedies available under law.

139 Raj Kumar (Retd.Lecturer) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Refix and revise the pension of by taking into account the total service rendered by the petitioner i.e. 34 years 2 months and 6 days


of 13503-01-2019


Resultantly, the petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for appointment to the post ofPGT Physics after giving him the benefit of 4 years teaching experience and one time exemption of HTET examination. Let the necessary exercise becompleted within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc.Application, if any, also stands disposed of.

140 Narender Kumar v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Consider for the post of PGT Physics


This petition is disposed of in the same terms as by the Division Bench in CWP No.22764 of 2017 titled Sushil Kumar and others v. State of Haryana. The decision be taken within a reasonable time.

141 Deshraj v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Pay fixation as per revised pay

Directorate15-02-201812-01-2018CWP 2095/18PGT-II

That being so, the petition is disposed of, in terms of the decision of this Court in Dharampal (supra). Respondent No. 2 will consider and pass appropriate orders on the representation dated 03.07.2018(P-6) in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

142 Rohta Kumar v/sState & Ors.



of 13503-01-2019


Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case or the entitlement of the petitioner for the above said relief and keeping in viewthe fact that the matter is still pending consideration, the present writ petition is disposed. A direction is issued to respondent no. 2 to take a decision on the legal notice dated 07.07.2015 (Annexure P-9) after taking into consideration the show cause notice dated 04.09.2015 (Annexure P-7) and the reply dated 26.09.2015 (Annexure P-8) filed by the petitioner and the justification given by the school also regarding the same if not alreadydone. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of 2 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. In case any adverse order is to be passed, the petitioner be given personal hearing before passing of the said order. If decision has already been taken, then copy be supplied to the petitioner.

143 Geeta v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Consider for the post of PGT Sanskrit


Consequently, these petitions are allowed in the same terms as Neelam Ranis' case (supra), with the competent authority amongst the respondents directed to consider the case of each of the petitioners for stepping up their pay scales to the level of their juniors, as per the ratio of the aforesaid judgment, and to pass a speaking order thereafter. The speaking order shall be passed in the case of each petitioner/identical set of petitioners within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

144 Meenakshi & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Step up of pay scales


of 13503-01-2019


Before parting with the judgment, it is clarified that this order cannot be held to benefit only those persons who had approached this Court,but it would also have to go to all those other candidates who had applied for the posts but have not approached this Court. Consequently, therespondents are directed to issue a public notice informing all such applicants who had passed the STET examination and had cleared the written test for the posts in question and had not approached this Court, but are otherwise similarly situated as petitioners, that they are now consideredto be eligible and then consider their claims also.Since the main cases have been decided, the pending Civil Misc. Application, if any, also stands disposed of.

145 Rakesh Kumar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.HTETDirectorate11-08-201702-05-2017


This petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority amongst the respondents to take a decision on the representation of the petitioner without delay and the petitioner thereafter be informedaccordingly.

146 Manisha Bhutani (Lect.in Physics) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.TransferDirectorate22-12-201617-10-2016

CWP 21362/16PGT-II


147 Dalbir Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.



18-12-2017CWP 21390/15PGT-II

of 13503-01-2019


Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2-Director, EducationDepartment Haryana, Sector 5, Panchkula to consider the claim of the petitioners put forth by them in representation (P-7) and to take a conscious decision in the light of judgments referred to above in para No.1 of this judgment, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. However, if the petitioners still feel aggrieved against any of the order passed by the concerned authority, they shall be at liberty to approach thisCourt as well as to have recourse to the other remedies available under law.

148 Mangtu Ram & Ors.(Lect.Pol.Sci.) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant of revised pay by restoring the deductions made from the payment of additional Dearness Allowances w.e.f.01.05.73 onwards alongwith arrear


In view of the above, without adverting to the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1-Additional Chief Secretary, Government of Haryana, Department of School Education, Haryana Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh to consider and decide the legal notice dated 13.04.2018 (Annexure P-10) in the light of Annexures P- 2, P-3 and P-4 within six weeks from the receipt of the certified copy of the order. In case, on consideration, the competent authority reaches to the conclusion that the benefit claimed by the petitioners is admissible to them,in such eventuality, the consequential relief be allowed to them, within a period of six weeks thereafter. However, in case the competent authority feels that the relief claimed by the petitioners is not admissible or made out,in that case, a speaking order be passed in the matter.

149 Ishwar Singh Pilania & Ors. v/sState & Ors.


Directorate17-10-201801-10-2018 28-11-2018CWP 21693/18PGT-IV

of 13503-01-2019



150 Sandeep v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Appointment for the post of Lect.Physical Education


27-05-2015CWP 21734/12PGT-I

Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case or the entitlement of the petitioner for the abovesaid relief and keeping in view the fact that the matter is still pending consideration, the present writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent-Commission to take a decision on the representation dated 21.08.2017 (Annexure P-7) and declare the result of the petitioner. In case the petitioner is found successful and falls within the zone of consideration for appointment, necessary steps will be taken to send a recommendation to the State Government forappointment. The said exercise shall be done within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. In case the petitioner does not fall within the zone of consideration, the Commission will inform the petitioner.

151 Anita v/sstate & Ors.

Reg.HTETDirectorate12-01-201825-09-2017 09-02-2018


of 13503-01-2019


Instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in the legal notice dated06.05.2016 (P-5) and to take a conscious decision by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, rules, regulations and instructions issued by theGovernment from time to time, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case, petitioner still feels aggrieved by any of the order(s) passed by the aforesaid authority, he shall be at liberty to have recourse to the remediesavailable under law and/or to approach this Court.

152 Kanta Rani v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Ante dated promotion


In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of by giving directions to the respondents to look into the legal notice of the petitioner and pass speaking orders within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

153 Raj Pal Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.


CWP 21895/18PGT-IV

Since penalty of punishment imposed upon the petitioner was not major (it was a minor), order dated 02.07.2012 (AnnexureP/7) is set aside and the petitioner is directed to be promotednotionally w.e.f. 18.08.2006 and a direction is also being given to the respondents to fix his notional pay w.e.f. 18.08.2006 for all intentsand purposes within a period of three months.Petition is allowed, accordingly.

154 Pawan Kumar v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Promotion to the post of Principal w.e.f.18.08.06 instead of 01.01.10

Directorate18-04-2016 LPA filed and same is allowed on 12.09.17 and decision came in favour of department

04-02-2016 03-05-2016CWP 21956/13HR(G-I)

of 13503-01-2019


Consequently, without making any comment whatsoever on the merit of the contentions raised by the petitioners, this petition is disposed ofwith a direction to the competent authority amongst the respondents to take a decision on the legal notice of the petitioners (Annexure P-7), dated 25.06.2017, by passing a speaking order within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

155 Rohtash Kumar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Regularize the services of the petitioners from the date juniors to the petitioners have been regularized i.e. 19.08.14 and to release all consequential benefits arising out of it.



156 Amit Bindra & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Deemed university matter for appointment of PGT Mathematics


27-05-2015CWP 22095/14PGT-I


157 Tarun Kaushik v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Consider for the post of PGT Mathematics


Deemed University MatterThe Hon'ble High Court granted stay in LPA No.1215 of 2015 against the order dt.27.05.15 passed in CWP No.7626/15 titled as Gurmail Kaur Vs. State of Haryana

27-05-2015CWP 22168/14PGT-I


158 Anu Gupta & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Submission of cases regarding promotion of Masters/Mistresses and C&V Teachers to different subject lecturer cadre


18-12-2017CWP 22199/15PGT-II

of 13503-01-2019


Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the matter in issue is squarely covered by an order and judgment, dated 20.02.2017, rendered by this Court in CWP No. 9347 of 2016 (Jagat Singh Yadav v.State of Haryana and others). And, therefore, the petition at hands be disposed of in the same terms.Ordered accordingly.

ORDER IN CWP No. 9347 of 2016 (Jagat Singh Yadav v.State of Haryana and others).

n the circumstances, the writ petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to remove the anomaly and to grant the petitioner the grade w.e.f. 1.1.1996 instead of 01.08.2000. The actual benefits will, however, be granted to the petitioner for a period of 38 months since the filing of the first writ petition i.e. 17.09.2015.Let necessary exercise of granting him the arrears be made within four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, failing which the petitioner would be entitled to interest also @ 12% p.a. from the date the amount fell due

159 Karan Pal & Ors. (Lect.in.History) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant Selection grade w.e.f 01.01.96 instead of 01.04.05/25.03.03

Directorate04-04-2018 Reminder has been issued to DEO Palwal on 21.05.18

21-03-2018 03-08-2018CWP 2223/17PGT-II

Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to repay the deducted amount to the tune of `69,950/- within aperiod of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.However, in case of non-compliance of the order it would entail interest @9% per annum from the date of passing of order dated 12.04.2016 (P-16) till actual payment.

160 Hem chander v/sState & Ors.

Reg.RecoveryDirectorate17-09-2018 Letter written to DEO

Sonepat for compliance dt. 20.09.18 & 25.10.18 and message given on telephone & through email also

13-08-2018 16-11-2018CWP 22375/15PEN-I

of 13503-01-2019


Consequently, these petitions are allowed in the same terms as Neelam Ranis' case (supra), with the competent authority amongst the respondents directed to consider the case of each of the petitioners for stepping up their pay scales to the level of their juniors, as per the ratio of the aforesaid judgment, and to pass a speaking order thereafter. The speaking order shall be passed in the case of each petitioner/identical set ofpetitioners within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. If the case of each/any petitioner(s) is found to be covered by the decision in that case, the arrears of difference of pay be released to themwithin another period of 3 months thereafter, but with such arrears restricted to a period of 3 years and 2 months prior to the date of filing of the petition before this Court, by each particular petitioner.On such arrears, the petitioners would also be entitled to interest @ 6% per annum, as was granted in Neelam Ranis' case.6. It needs to be noticed that in Neelam Ranis' case, it is seen that no restriction of payment of arrears was ordered, but that was obviously forthe reason that she had stated that she was drawing less salary than her juniors from 01.07.2009, with the petition having been filed in the year 2010 itself, i.e. soon thereafter, hence there was obviously no need to restrict the arreras.. A photocopy of this order be also placed on the files of the other connected matters.

161 Bhoop Singh & Ors. (Lect.in Phy.Education) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Pay FixationDirectorate30-04-201830-10-2017 29-08-2018

CWP 22417/17PGT-II

of 13503-01-2019



162 Ramesh Kumar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.



27-05-2015CWP 22470/14PGT-I

In our considered view, unless the rule is found to be inconsistent with any Constitutional provisions or a Statute or against public policy, it would not be expedient for a Writ Court to interfere with it and assume the role of Rule Making Authority. The amendment, substitution or streamlining of the existing provisions, essentially falls within the purview of Rule Making Authority. It is thus not necessary to express any views on merits, rather we deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.1 to entertain this petition as a representation onbehalf of the petitioners and consider their grievance in accordance with the State policy. It shall be appreciated if an appropriate decision is taken within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. The petitioner shall be required to send a copy of the writ petition alongwith certified copy of this order to respondent No.1.Ordered accordingly.

163 Lakhbir Shing & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Quashing the impugned Note-III of Appendix-B (Annexure P-I) dated 11.04.12 and in consequence the substituted provision of corrigendum dt. 01.09.16 (Annexure P-8) being ultra vires to Article 14 of the constitution of India and being unjustified, arbitrary and having no nexus with the ultimate object to be achieved amounting to bad effect of birth marks throughout the life of a candidate

Directorate28-11-2016 File is being submitted27-10-2016 27-03-2017CWP 22554/16Coordination

of 13503-01-2019


Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-The Director,Secondary Education, Haryana, Shiksha Sadan, Sector 5, Panchkula to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioners in the legal notice dated 23.05.2018 (P-6) and to take a conscious decision by passing a speaking order particularlyin view of judgment rendered by this Court in CWP No. 9347 of 2016, titled as Jagat Singh Yadav vs. State of Haryana and others; decided on 20.02.2017 (P-8) which as per the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners hasattained finality, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. However, if petitioners still feel aggrieved by any of the orders passed by the aforesaid authority, they shall be at liberty to approachthis Court.

164 Sneh Lata & Anr v/sState & Ors.



Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case,instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to pass appropriate orders in favour of the petitioners on the representation dated21.03.2018 (P-7), keeping in view CWP No. 18296-2014. . This exercise shall be completed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The State after doing the needful shall inform this Court as well.

165 Hari Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.



of 13503-01-2019



166 Surender Kumar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Appointment/Post Graduate from deemed universities


27-05-2015CWP 22653/14PGT-I

In our considered view, unless the rule is found to be inconsistent with any Constitutional provision or a Statute or it is against the public policy, it would not be expedient for a Writ Court to interfere with it and assume the role of Rule Making Authority. The amendment, substitution or streamlining of the existing provisions thus is an exercise which essentially falls within the purview of the Rule Making Authority. It is not necessary for this Court to express any views on merits, rather it would be appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.1 to entertain this petition as a representation on behalf of the petitioner and consider his grievances in accordance with the law. Itshall be appreciated if an appropriate decision is taken within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. The petitioner shall be required to send a copy of the writ petition alongwith certified copy of this order to respondent No.1.Ordered accordingly.

167 Zakir Hussain v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Consider for the post of PGT History


After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, we dispose of the instant petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the legal notice (Annexure P-7) submitted by the petitioners as expeditiously as possible.

168 Sushil Kumar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Fixation of their pay in revised pay scalesand grant of arrears on account of it,

Directorate27-10-201706-10-2017CWP 22764/17PGT-II

of 13503-01-2019


After hearing learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of various orders and the stand taken in the written statement, it would be in the interest of justice that in case the petitioner makes a detail representation to the competent authority i.e. the Managing Committee preferably within a period of one month from today, it is expected that the Managing Committee shall consider the same preferably within a period of two monthsthereafter.The contempt petition is disposed of accordingly.In case the petitioner is still aggrieved in any manner, he is at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy.

169 Ishwar Singh v/sSh.P.K.Dass, IAS

Reg.Revise the pension and pensionary benefits after computing the service w.e.f 18.01.88 to 31.10.11

Directorate05-12-201701-11-2017 04-03-2018COCP 228/17 IN cwp nO.7684/15PEN-II

Without making any observation on the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this petition with a direction to the respondents No.3 to 5 to consider and decide the legal notice dated (Annexure P5) within a period of two months in accordance with law.The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

170 Narender Singh (Lect in Geography) v/sState & Ors.


CWP 22879/16PGT-II

At this stage, present petition is disposed of by giving direction to the respondents to look into the legal notice dated 16.05.2018 (Annexure P-5) and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case,the petitioner is found eligible, his services be regularized with all consequential benefits at par with his juniors.

171 Jagdish Chander v/sState & Ors.


Directorate31-10-201804-10-2018 28-11-2018CWP 23112/18HRME-II

of 13503-01-2019


That being so, the petition is disposed of, at this stage, only with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners as also their representation, dated 17.11.2017 (Annexure P-4), within a period of three months from the receipt of a certified copy of this order. And, pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. In the event, the claim of the petitioners is declined, the authority shall pass a comprehensiveorder assigning reasons in support thereof.

172 Ramesh Kumar & Ors.(Lect.inPol.Science) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant the house rent allowances monthly without computing @10% of basic pay of petitioners and overlooking the statutory provision of notification 2/10/2013-4FR/1669 dated 19.07.2016


Without making any observation on the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this petition with direction to respondent No.2 toconsider and decide representation of the petitioner dated 23.9.2016 (Annexure P-9), in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

173 Indu Rani v/sState & Ors.


CWP 23296/16PGT-III

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case,instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioners in the legal notice dated15.05.2018 (P-10) and to take a conscious decision in accordance with law, rules and regulations, particularly in view of the judgments referred toabove in para 1 of this order, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.However, in case petitioners still feel aggrieved by any order of the afore-said authorities, they shall be at liberty to have recourse to the other remedies available under law as well as to approach this Court.

174 Kaiash Chand Sharma & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Revised Pay Scale


of 13503-01-2019


Accordingly, without commenting upon the merits of the case or the entitlement of the petitioner, as such, keeping in view the above and the fact thatthe necessary order would have to be passed by the competent authority. The representation dated 27.09.2012 (Annexure P-7) has been addressed to the erstwhile employer and not to respondents No.1 & 2, with whom the petitioner has been re-employed, therefore, the present writ petition is disposed of, with a direction to the competent authority to treat the writ petition as representation and decide the said issue as to the petitioner's entitlement to be treated under theOld Pension Scheme, as prayed for. Let necessary decision be taken within a period of 2 months from the receipt of a certified copy of this order. If the benefit is to be denied, the same should contain reasons and be conveyed to thepetitioner, forthwith.

175 Ram Bhagat (Lect.in.History) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Count previous service as clerk for the purpose of pensionary benefits

Directorate28-11-2017 Letter issued to DEO Jhajjar for sending case

10-11-2017 27-01-2018CWP 23600/17PGT-II

In view of the above factual position, the writ petition stands allowed and direction is given to respondents to consider the petitioner eligiblefor selection under Category No 18 (Haryana Cadre) and category No. 34 (For Mewat District), in view of notification dated 22.03.2018 (Annexure P-11 and P-12). This exercise shall be completed within a period of four weeks.

176 Tabassum v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Appointment for the post of PGT Urdu


of 13503-01-2019


Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case or the entitlement of the petitioner for the above said relief and keeping in view the fact that the matter is still pending consideration, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 2 that he shall sympathetically consider the request of the petitioner in view of the averments which have been recorded above. Accordingly, a decision on the representation dated 20.07.2017 (Annexure P-10) will be taken within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order and keeping in mind the fact that the transfer had been cancelled 2-1/2 months later and in normal circumstances, an employee is entitled to stay for a period of at least 2 years as per the policy of the State itself.

177 Mange Ram v/sState & Ors.

Reg.TransferDirectorate27-10-2017 13/229-17 ME(4)

As per A.G opinion it is not fit case for filing LPA. File put up to Higher Authority for orders

13-10-2017 08-12-2017CWP 23686/17HRME-I

In the circumstances, the writ petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to remove the anomaly and to grant the petitioner the grade w.e.f. 1.1.1996 instead of 01.08.2000. The actual benefits will, however, be granted to the petitioner for a period of 38 months since the filing of the first writ petition i.e. 17.09.2015. Let necessary exercise of granting him the arrears be made within four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, failing which the petitioner would be entitled to interest also @ 12% p.a. from the date of amount fell due.

178 Kuldeep Singh v/sState & Ors.



of 13503-01-2019


Without commenting upon the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of by giving directions to the respondents to look into their representations dated 06.09.2017 and 09.09.2017 (Annexure P-2) and decide the same in view of the judgment referred above, within a period of 4weeks from the date of certified copy of this order.

179 Shiv Kumar Dhiman & Ors. v/sState & Ors.


CWP 24015/18HR(G-I)

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2-Director Secondary Education Haryana, Panchkula to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in legal notice (P-5) and to take a conscious decision, within a periodof three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.However, if petitioner still feels aggrieved by any of the orders passed by the aforesaid authority, he shall be at liberty to approach this Court orto have recourse to the other remedies available under law.

180 Mushtaque Ahemed v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant of Higher pay scale and grant of pensionary benefits

Directorate14-11-201820-09-2018 13-02-2019CWP 24122/18CCA

Consequently, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority amongst the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the aforesaid judgments, as also the order of the Director Secondary Education dated 18.10.2016, Annexure P-7, by passing a speaking order, within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

181 Mukesh Kumar v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Fix the pay in the revised pay scale of Rs.1640-2900 instead of 1400-2600 w.e.f.22.12.98 and Rs.2000-3500 w.e.f.01.05.90 as well as in the corresponding revised pay scale w.e.f. 01.01.96 and 01.01.06

Directorate09-11-2017 File is sent to the Audit Cell for opinion

27-10-2017 08-02-2018CWP 24252/17HR(G-I)

of 13503-01-2019


Keeping in view the prayer made in the petition, the present petition is allowed with a direction to the competent authority, to consider and decide the case of the petitioner, in terms of judgment inLPA No.1169 of 2012 titled as 'State of Haryana and another Vs. Harbans Lal and others', decided on 08.10.2012, by passing a speaking order, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.14.05.2015

182 Ram Charan Sharma v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Arrear of Revised Pension

Directorate09-07-2015 Recalling order by filing CM No.11117/15 and same is fixed for hearing on 20.11.15 and Hon'ble Court granted stay stay till the decision of SLP No.38930/15

14-05-2015 08-11-2015CWP 24319/13PEN-II

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in the legal notice dated 25.07.2018 (P-5) and to take a conscious decision in accordance with law, rules and regulations,particularly in view of the judgments referred in the legal notice, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. However, in case petitioners still feel aggrieved by any order of the afore-said authority, he shall be at liberty to have recourse to other remediesavailable under law including to approach this Court.

183 Prem Chand v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant the benefit of revised pension


of 13503-01-2019


Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 or any other competent officer to deal with the matter, to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioners in their representation dated 10.11.2017 (P-10) and to take a conscious decision in accordance with law, rules and regulations, particularly in view of the judgment referred in para 1 of this order, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of his order.However, in case petitioners still feel aggrieved by any order of the afore-said authorities, they shall at liberty to have recourse to other remedies available under law including to approach this Court.

184 Attar Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant the Selection Grade


Keeping in view the prayer made in the petition, the present petition is allowed with a direction to the competent authority, to consider and decide the case of the petitioner, in terms of judgment inLPA No.1169 of 2012 titled as 'State of Haryana and another Vs. Harbans Lal and others', decided on 08.10.2012, by passing a speaking order, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

185 Subhash Chander, Retd.SSM from Hindu Sr.Sec.School, Kaithal v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Pensionary Benefits

Directorate13-07-2015 Recalling order by filing CM No.11117/15 and same is fixed for hearing on 20.11.15 and Hon'ble Court granted stay stay till the decision of SLP No.38930/15

14-05-2015 12-11-2015CWP 24479/11PEN-II

of 13503-01-2019


Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to consider and decide the legal notice dated 18.06.2018 (Annexure P-5) and pass a speaking and reasoned order in view of the judgment passed by this Hon'ble Court in CWP No.27304 of 2013 on 01.10.2015 (AnnexureP-6) within a period of 6 months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. However, if the claim of the petitioners is found valid and genuine then they be granted necessary benefits as claimed in the petition w.e.f. 01.04.2010 with all consequential benefits.

186 Subhash & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Arrear of payDirectorate17-10-201826-09-2018 16-04-2019

CWP 24617/18HRME-I

Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in the representations (P-4 & P-5) and to take a conscious decision in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy ofthis order. However, if the petitioner still feels aggrieved by any order of the afore-said authorities, he shall be at liberty to approach this Court.

187 Niranjan Singh Shishodia (Lect.in Economics) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Count the service rendered in private aided school since 16.08.76 to 10.01.83 before joining in the department of education in Govt.of haryana for the purpose of pensionary benefits


of 13503-01-2019


Keeping in view the above, this Court is of the opinion that since the petitioner has been declared qualified at a subsequent point of time and asper the terms of the advertisement, has become eligible. In case the interview process has not been completed for the above-said posts, it would be appropriate that respondent No.2 will take a decision on the representation dated 23.10.2017(Annexure P-9) within 10 days from the receipt of a certified copy of this order.In case the petitioner is not to be permitted to appear in the interview process, she shall be communicated reasons for the same.Writ petition stands disposed of in the above-said terms.

188 Sonia Rani v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Consider for the post of PGT Mathematic

Directorate06-12-2017 It is not fit case for filing LPA as per opinion of A.G

01-11-2017 16-12-2017CWP 24730/17PGT-I


189 Bal Rishi v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Appointment for the post of Lecturer English


27-05-2015CWP 24757/13PGT-I

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents decide the legal notice dated 13.04.2018 (Annexure P-10) and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. This exercise shall be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

190 Rajender Singh Hooda & Ors. v/sState & Ors.



of 13503-01-2019


The writ petition is allowed in view of thejudgment passed by this Court in CWP No.7626 of 2015 titled as Gurmail Kaur andothers Vs. State of Haryana and another

191 Shiv Kumar & Anr v/sState & Ors.


Directorate14-08-2015 The Hon'ble High Court granted stay in LPA No.1215 of 2015 against the order dt.27.05.15 passed in CWP No.7626/15 titled as Gurmail Kaur Vs. State of Haryana

27-05-2015CWP 24859/13PGT-I

Keeping in view the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondents to consider the legal notice dated 12.05.2017(Annexure P-9) and pass necessary order in accordance with law and keeping in view the fact that the similarly situated persons who filed CWP No.15065 of 2013 have been granted thesame benefits. In case the petitioners are found entitled for the benefits, the same be released to them within a period of two months from date ofreceipt of copy of the order.Disposed of.

192 Mrs.Usha Gandhi v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Pay Scale of vocational merger employee in Education Department


of 13503-01-2019


Instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No.2 & 3 to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in the legal notice dated 30.05.2018 (P-12) and to take a conscious decision by passing a speaking order considering all the facts narrated in the aforesaid legal notice (P-12), within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case, competent authorities comes to the conclusion that petitioner is entitled to the relief(s) claimed, same be released to him within a period of next 45 days.However, if petitioner still feels aggrieved by any of the orders passed by the aforesaid authority, he shall be at liberty to have recourse to the other remedies available under law as well as to approach this Court.

193 Jai Bhagwan v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Release the pension and pensionary benefits after regularizing of his services w.e.f.27.01.90/01.02.99 with all consequential benefits as the services of juniors to him have been regularized w.e.f. 27.01.99


In view of the pendency of the matter before the competent authority for decision-making, this petition is disposed of with a similar direction to the competent authority amongst the respondents that legal notice dated 01.04.2017 (Annex P-17) would be taken up and decided together with other cases by a uniform decision taken expeditiously inwriting and conveyed to the stake-holders.

194 Beer Singh & Ors.(Lect.in Pol.Science) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Pay FixationDirectorate11-04-2018 Letter issued to DEO

Narnaul05-02-2018

CWP 2531/18PGT-II

In view of above, present writ petition stands disposed of with the directions to the respondents to look into legal notice dated 23.07.2018 (Annexure P9) and take required action thereon expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

195 Abhey Ram v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Antedated promotion to the post of Headmaster and to consider his claim for the promotion to the post of Principal



196 Subhash chander v/sState & Ors.



18-12-2017CWP 25512/15PGT-II

of 13503-01-2019


The issue is open for the competent authority to look into in accordance with law by passing a speaking order. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the legal notice after hearing the petitioners or their representative/s effectively before assigning comprehensive reasons upon which the decision is proposed to be passed. The decision be taken within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and conveyed to the petitioners within the same time frame. If relief is deserved, it may be granted without the necessity of passing a reasoned order.

197 Rajbala & Ors. v/sState & Ors.



This petition is being disposed of by giving direction to the respondents to pass appropriate orders on the legal notice dated 23.05.2018 (Annexure P-5) keeping in view the judgment passed by this Court in CWP-14131-2016 Mukesh Kumar and others V/s. State of Haryana and others (Annexure P-6), in accordance with law.

198 Partap Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.


Directorate12-10-201805-10-2018CWP 25655/18HRME-II

of 13503-01-2019


Resultantly, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioners would be entitled for appointment against the vacant seats which were neverconsumed being in the zone of consideration and accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed. The petitioners shall be offered appointment lettersand the State should operate the merit list in the respective categories in the subjects of English, Hindi, and Biology. In case there are persons senior in merit than the petitioners, they will firstly be offered the said posts and in case the vacancies still exist, the petitioners will be accommodated. Thenecessary exercise be concluded within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the judgment.

199 Arun Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Issue Appointment letters of PGT English


Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to consider and decide the legal notice of the petitioners within a reasonable period of three months. The competent authority would look into the seniority list of Laboratory Assistants and other relevant facts and then pass an order in writing containing the reasons for the conclusion/s. If the claim of the petitioners is found fair and justified, no speaking order is required to be passed and the petitioners may be promoted from the date their juniors havebeen promoted in accordance with rules.

200 Satbir Singh & Ors. (L.A) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.ACPDirectorate19-02-2018 Write to DEO Hisar on

18.05.18, 19.06.18, 06.09.18, 12.10.18 & 06.11.18 for compliance

05-02-2018CWP 2569/18HRME-II

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of by giving direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the legal notice dated 25.07.2018 (Annexure P-3) in accordance with lawexpeditiously.

201 Anil Kumar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Pay FixationDirectorate17-10-201806-10-2018

CWP 25713/18PGT-I

of 13503-01-2019


Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case or the entitlement of the petitioners for the abovesaid relief and keeping in view the fact that the matter is still pending consideration, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to take a decision on the legal notice dated 10.08.2017 (Annexure P-4) within aperiod of 3 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. In case any adverse order is to be passed, a reasoned order be passed and conveyed to the petitioners

202 Sandoki v/sState & Ors.



At this stage, the present petition is disposed of by giving direction to the respondents to look into the legal notice dated 21.08.2017 (Annexure P-5) and pass appropriate orders as per Haryana Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, which have been amended thereafter. Thisexercise be completed within a period of six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

203 Chander Bhan Sharma & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant the benefit of ist, 2nd & 3rd ACP grade pay/scale in relation to the modified/upgraded pay scales on completion of 10,20 & 30 years if regular service.


Since the SLP filed by State of Haryana, has now been dismissed, this petition is disposed of by giving direction to the respondents to look into the legal notice dated 09.08.2018 (Annexure P-8) and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

204 Bhajan Lal & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant pay parity with their junior by giving them notional promotion/adjustment as LA


of 13503-01-2019


In these circumstances, the respondents are directed to release the interest on the delayed payment of retiral benefits, as per governmentinstructions within two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of.

205 Anil Kumar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.ACPDirectorate24-03-201730-01-2017 23-05-2017

CWP 25875/15PGT-IV

Instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent(s) to consider the case of the petitioner and take a final decision in terms of Rule 7 of Haryana Civil Service (Assured Career Progression) Rules, 2008 read with letter dated 04.03.2014 (Annexure P-1), within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The factum of grant of interest on delayed payment of retiral benefits shall also be considered in view of the observations made by Full Bench of this Court in case captioned as “R.S. Randhawa vs. State of Punjab, 1997 (3) RSJ 318. However, if the petitioner still feels aggrieved of the order passed by the concerned authority, he shall be at liberty to approach this Court.

206 Joginder Singh (Lect.Pol.Science) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.3rd ACPDirectorate30-11-201716-11-2017 01-03-2018

CWP 26121/17PGT-IV

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondents to consider and decidethe representation (Annex P-5) promptly.

207 Suminder Singh v/sState & Ors.


CWP 26254/16PGT-II

The present petition is being disposed of with similar direction as in the judgement of Jitender Singh's case (supra) (Annexure P-24) and respondent No. 2 will allow the petitioners to join their respective stations, who have been transferred vide order dated 23.02.2018 (Annexure P-4) within a period of two weeks

208 Sanjay Kumar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Petitioners who are PGT of Mewat Cadre have not been allowed to be relieved, for joining the DIET


of 13503-01-2019


Perusal of the records it is evident that no reasons have been assigned as to why the petitioner's name was over looked for promotion to the post of Assistant and Deputy Superintendent as and when it was due.Therefore, the condition imposed in the order dated 04.10.2013 (Annexure P-1) to the extent that the petitioner is entitled to notional pay fixation with effect from 14.09.2011 is hereby set aside and the concerned respondent is directed to pay arrears during the intervening period from 14.09.2011 to04.10.2013 in the cadre of Deputy Superintendent and extend petitioner's difference of pay along with the interest at the rate 9% per annum andpetitioner is entitled to cost of `10,000/-. Cost shall be paid to the petitioner within three months.

209 Jagdish Kumar v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant the arrear of Promotion as Dy.Sudt.

Directorate12-04-2017 13/52-15 ME(4)LPA is being filed. A.G.Haryana raised some objections in draft of LPA

21-03-2017 20-06-2017CWP 26386/14HRME-I

Without commenting upon the arguments as such raised by the counsel for the petitioner and keeping in view the fact the counsel was not present before the Appellate Authority, and in view of the averments made in Para No.4 of the writ petition justifying the absence, the present writ petition is allowed. The Appellate Order dated11.08.2015 (Annexure P-2) passed by the respondent No.1 is, accordingly, set aside. The said respondent shall re-hear the appeal of thepetitioner.Necessary exercise be done within a period of 3 months from the receipt of the certified copy of this order.

210 S.K.Education Society v/sState & Ors.

Reg.RecognitionDirectorate06-09-2016 File put up to fix

personal hearing before W.ACSSE

26-08-2016 05-12-2016CWP 26654/15HR(PS)

of 13503-01-2019


Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No.1 and 3 to comply with the order dated 24.7.2015, for the purpose of conducting the audit of the school fundsof respondent No.6, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, the order is not complied with, the petitioner may, if so advised, avail the remedy of filing application for revival of this petition or for initiating contempt proceedings.

211 DPS Sector 19 Faridabad Parents Association v/sState & Ors.

Reg.DirectingRespondentNo 1 ie theGovernment of Haryana Department of SchoolEducation and RespondentNo 3 ie DirectorSchool Education Government of Haryanatoconduct a comprehensiveaudit of the Schoolfunds of RespondentNo 6 ie Delhi Public School Sector 19Faridabad Haryana

Directorate27-03-2017 Letter has been issued on 31.05.17 to conduct the audit under Rule 158-A

08-02-2017 26-06-2017CWP 26820/16HR(PS)

That being so, the petition is disposed of, at this stage, only with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner, as also her representation dated 11.10.2017 (Annexure P7), within a period of 3 months from the receipt of certified copy of this order. Andpass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Needless to assert that in the event the claim of the petitioner is declined, the authority shall pass acomprehensive order assigning reasons in support thereof

212 Nirmal Dhull v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Promotion for the post of Principal being a handicapped person

Directorate08-03-2018 File in similar case is sent to the C.S for clarification on roaster point

07-02-2018 07-06-2018CWP 2685/18HR(G-I)

This petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the grievance of the petitioner and consider it sympathetically inthe 2nd transfer drive of Post Graduate Teachers in the Education Department, Haryana. Let the final decision be taken within a week or 10 days at most and conveyed to the petitioner.

213 Sushma Rani v/sState & Ors.

Reg.TransferDirectorate25-01-2017 Participated in Second

Drive23-12-2016 04-02-2017


of 13503-01-2019


At this stage, this petition is being disposed of by giving direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner keeping in view the judgment passed in CWP-2009-2016 Balwinder Singh and others V/s. State of Haryana and others, decided on 04.10.2018 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order failing which Rs.50,000/- will be paid by the respondents to the petitioner as costs.

214 Uday Veer v/sState & Ors.



The petition is being disposed of by giving direction to the respondents to pass speaking order on the legal notice dated 14.08.2018 (Annexure P-7) within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order

215 Mahabir Singh v/sState & Ors.



This petition is being disposed of by giving direction to the respondents to pass appropriate order keeping in view detailed order passed in CWP-2009-2016 Balwinder Singh and others V/s. State of Haryana and others, decided on 04.10.2018, within a period of three months fromthe date of receipt of certified copy of this order failing which Rs.50,000/- will be paid to the petitioner as cost

216 Bhateri Devi v/sState & Ors.



Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the matter in issue is squarely covered by an order and judgment, dated 20.02.2017, rendered by this Court in CWP No. 9347 of 2016 (Jagat Singh Yadav v.State of Haryana and others). And, therefore, the petition at hands be disposed of in the same terms.Ordered accordingly.

217 Kailash Chand & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Higher Pay Scale which was subject matter in CWP No.8082/01 and same was allowed while restricting arrears of pay to 38 months to the filing of the writ petition


of 13503-01-2019


In response, learned State counsel submits that the claim of the petitioners, as also their representation dated 13.09.2017 (Annexure P3 Colly.), shall be considered and dealt with by the respondent authority within a period of 4 weeks from today. And the appropriate orders, in accordance with law, shall be passed and communicated to the petitioners asalso their counsel.That being so, the petition is disposed of in the above terms. Needless to assert that in the event the claim of the petitioners is declined, the respondent authority shall pass a comprehensive order assigning reasons in support thereof

218 Krishna Devi & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.State Teacher Award


At this stage, present petition is disposed of by giving direction to respondents to examine the case of the petitioners in view of the order dated 04.10.2018 passed by this Court in Balwinder Singh and others vs. State of Haryana and others, CWP No.2009 of 2016 (Annexure P-6), especially keeping in view that services of similarly situated employeeshave already been regularized as per Annexure P-3 (Colly.) and pass appropriate order(s) in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, no order is passed within the stipulated period, costs of Rs.50,000/- will be imposedupon the respondent-State

219 Jasveer Kaur & Ors v/sState & Ors.



of 13503-01-2019


Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2- The Director General, Secondary Education, Haryana, Shiksha Sadan, Sector 5, Panchkula to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in the aforesaid legal notice dated November 06, 2017 (P-13) and take a conscious decision by passing a speaking order, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. However, in case, petitioner still feels aggrieved of the order passed by concerned authority, he shall be at liberty to approach this Court.

220 Mam Chand Sharma v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant Pensionary benefits


Without making any comment on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority amongst the respondents to decide the legal notice dated 30.10.2017 (Annexure P-10) by passing a speaking order after hearing the petitioners or their representatives within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case the benefit is granted, there will be no need to pass a speaking order and the claim can be decided by passing office order. In case an adverse order is proposed then necessity of hearing will arise.

221 Sangeeta Ashri & Ors. v/sState & Ors.



of 13503-01-2019


For orders see judgment of even date passed in CWP No.1098 of 2016 Yashpal Singh & others Vs. State of Haryana & Ors.

CWP NO.1098/16 ORDERS

A perusal of the afore-referred preliminary fact finding inquiry by the DEO, Rohtak shows recommendation of disciplinary proceedings against the Principal and the TGTs mentioned therein. It is directed that the final decision with regard to the same be taken by the competent Authority expeditiously but not later than one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

222 Pawan Kumar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Challenge the transfer orders


In the first instance, the competent authority to consider cases of regularization in the department would look into the grievance of the petitioner and pass a speaking order on the legal notice after hearing her.Let the exercise be completed within two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.With these observations and directions, the petition stands disposed of

223 Ramesh Chand v/sState & Ors.



Learned State counsel undertakes to grant the benefits to the petitioners as per judgment of Single Bench but subject to decision ofreview application, which is pending. The necessary exercise be done within a period of four weeksfrom today.The petition is disposed of accordingly.However, in case, the respondents fail to comply with the order as per undertaking, the petitioners are at liberty to move an application forrevival of contempt petition.

224 Sudesh Kumar & Ors. v/sSmt.Surina Rajan, IAS & Ors.

Reg.Grant same pay scales and allowances as admissible to their counter parts working in Govt.Schools

Directorate22-08-2017 As per order dated 25.08.17 passed by the Hon'ble High Court in RA-CW No.278/15 in CWP No.8781/12 Sudesh Kumari V.State, no action is required to be taken in persuance of the above orders for implementation of order dt. 12.07.17 as the order dt. 16.01.12 will not be given effect to during the pendency of the review application

12-07-2017 09-08-2017COCP 2984/13 in CWP No.8781/12HR(AS)

of 13503-01-2019


Accordingly, the present writ petition is treated as arepresentation on behalf of the petitioners and is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to look into the grievance of the petitioners, hearing them and take a final decision within three months from the date of certified copy of this order.

225 Sanjay Kumar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Advance increment on acquire higher qualification


Keeping in view the above, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation today itself, to respondent No.2, who will pass a speaking orderthereupon on 01.01.2018 by 13:00 hours.This petition is disposed of accordingly. A copy of this order be given under the signatures of Bench Secretary of this Court

226 Nisha Education v/sState & Ors.

Reg.The petitioner is aggrieved by the order Annexure P-4, whereby all the Schools in Haryana have been directed to observe winter vacation from 25.12.2017 to 08.01.2018. He submits that according to the Haryana School Education Rules 2003, a total 220 working days are mandated and this year because of public violence in Haryana caused by the followers of Baba Gurmit Ram Rahim Singh, in the month of August 2017, the schools have not been able to complete the mandated period,

Directorate01-01-201829-12-2017 01-01-2018CWP 30061/17Academic

of 13503-01-2019


Without making any comment on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority amongst the respondents to decide the legal notice dated 9.11.2017(Annexure P-10) by passing a speaking order after hearing the petitioners or their representatives within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case the benefit is granted, there will be no need to pass a speaking order and the claim can be decided by passing office order. In case an adverse order is proposed then necessity of hearing will arise.

227 Pawan Kumar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.


CWP 3184/18HR(G-I)

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in his representation dated October 10, 2017 (P-6) and to take a conscious decision by passing a speaking order particularly in view of the judgments in case Vijay Singh vs. State of Haryana & ors., CWP No.16817 of 2007 dediced on July 22, 2009 and Sheel Sharma vs. State of Haryana & anr. CWP No.7105 of2014 decided on July 23, 2015, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case, petitioner still feelsaggrieved by any of the orders passed by the aforesaid authority, he shall be at liberty to approach this Court.

228 Harminder Singh v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Count the service of the petitioner, from 24.02.03 to 31.01.17 as regular service of the petitioner for retiral and pensionary benefits

Directorate08-03-201812-02-2018 07-06-2018CWP 3186/18HR(AS)

We are informed that the relief claimed in this writ petition is similar to that of CWP No.5117 of 2003 titled as Rajinder Kumar & others Vs. State of Haryana & others, which has been disposed of by a separate order of even date.Accordingly, this writ petition is also disposed of in the same terms.

229 Vinod Kumar v/sState & Ors.

To grant Adhoc increment in term of the judgment CWP No.7862/06 Hanumant Singh for the purpose of retiral benefits

Directorate22-09-2015 Documents handover to Legal Cell Haryanaq New Delhi for filing SLP

10-08-2015CWP 3194/10PGT-II

of 13503-01-2019


For detail order see order of even date in CWP-3542-1999(O&M) titled as “Ranjodh Singh and others vs. State of Haryanaand others.”

230 Gurmail Chand & Ors. v/sState & Ors.


Directorate25-04-2017 File sent to F.D09-02-2017CWP 3541/99Coordination

Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner states that the facts of the present case are covered by the judgment of this Court passed in CWP-10269-2010 titled as “Makhan Singh vs. State of Haryana andanother” decided on 23.09.2015 and pray that the present petitions be disposed of in the same term.

231 Ranjodh Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.


Directorate25-04-2017 File sent to F.D09-02-2017CWP 3542/99Coordination

That being so, the petition is disposed of, at this stage, only with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner, as also his legal notice 23.01.2018 (Annexure P9), within a period of 8 weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order. And pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. In the event the claim of the petitioner is declined, the respondent authority shall pass a comprehensive order assigning reasons in support thereof.

232 Arun Sehrawat v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Promotion for teh post of PGT History


In response, learned State counsel submits that this petition itself shall be considered as representation on behalf of the petitioner, and the respondents shall deal with the grievance and claim of the petitioner within a period of 4 weeks from today. Appropriate orders, in accordance with law, shall be passed and communicated to the petitioner.The petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms.Needless to assert that in the event the claim of the petitioner is declined, the respondent authority shall pass a comprehensive order assigning reasons in support thereof.


Reg.Delegation of power of Drawing and Disbursing


of 13503-01-2019


That being so, the petition is disposed of, at this stage, only with a direction to respondents No.1 to 3, to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners, as also their legal notice dated 16.12.2017 (Annexure P6), within a period of 3 months from the receipt of certified copy of this order.And pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Needless to assert that in the event the claim of the petitioners is declined, the respondent authorityshall pass a comprehensive order assigning reasons in support thereof

234 Hans Kaur & Ors. v/sState & Ors.


Directorate21-03-2018 13/120-18ME (6)20-02-2018 20-06-2018CWP 4002/18HRME-I


235 Wazir Singh v/sState & Ors.



of 13503-01-2019


After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner andkeeping in view the facts and circumstances, this petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file appeal under Section 10(4) of the Act. It is further clarified that if 1 of 2 any such appeal is filed by the petitioner within one week fromtoday, the same shall be decided by the Appellate Authority within two weeks thereafter by passing a speaking order.

236 Shri Ganga Ram Sanatan Dharma High School, Sargodha, Abmala v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Management of the School run by the petitioner has been ordered to be taken over by way of appointment of Administrator for a period of one year

Directorate25-04-2016 Personal hearing on 09.06.16 before W.ACSSE. No next date hearing is fixed

31-03-2016 21-04-2016CWP 4107/16HR(AS)

The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari quashing order dated 08.08.2014 and 25.08.2014 to the extent of dateof regularization vide which the service of the petitioners have been regularized w.e.f. 08.08.2014 and 25.08.2014 instead of 01.04.2011, the date when juniors have been regularized.The petition stands disposed of with the direction to the respondents to decide the legal notice dated 25.12.2017 and inform the result to the petitioners within a reasonable time.

237 Salochana & Ors. v/sState & Ors.



Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, a direction is issued to 2nd respondent to consider and decide the legal notice dated 23.12.2017 by passing a speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.With the above direction, the petition stands disposed of.

238 Satpal & Ors. v/sState & Ors.



of 13503-01-2019


Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondents to look into thegrievances unfolded by the petitioner in her legal notice dated 22.11.2017 (Annexure P-1) and to decide the same in terms of judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 9347 of 2016 (O&M), captioned as “Jagat Singh Yadav v. State of Haryana and others, decided on 20.02.2017, within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.However, if the petitioner still feels aggrieved against any of the order(s) passed by the concerned authority, she shall be at liberty to have recourse to the other remedies available to her as well as to approach this Court.

239 Anita Kapoor (Retd.DEEO) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Refixation of Pay


Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2-The Director, Haryana School Education, Shiksha Sadan, Panchkula, Haryana to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in legal notice dated30.08.2017 (Annexure P-5) and to decide the same particularly keeping in view the judgment passed by this Court in CWP-7684-2015 (O&M), captioned as “Ishwar Singh v. State of Haryana and others”, decided on 09.08.2016 (Annexure P-4), within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, the petitioner still feels aggrieved against any of the order(s) passed by the concerned authority, he shall be at liberty to have recourse to the other remedies available under law including filing of writ petition.

240 Ved Parkash Gupta v/sState & Ors.



of 13503-01-2019


Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent to calculate and make the interest @ 9% per annum on the delayed payments, after expiry of three months from the date of retirement till the actual date(s) the various payments of the retiral benefits were made, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case of non-compliance of aforesaid direction, the petitionershall be at liberty to have recourse to the other remedies available to her as well as to approach this Court.

241 Aruna Aggarwal v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Retiral BenefitsDirectorate29-10-201821-09-2018 28-12-2018

CWP 4541/14PEN-II


242 Pardeep Kumar v/sState & Ors.



27-05-2015CWP 4589/14PGT-I

That being so, the petition is disposed of, at this stage, only with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners, as also their representation dated 24.01.2018 (Annexure P14), within a period of 3 months from the receipt of certified copy of this order.And pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Needless to assert that in the event the claim of the petitioners is declined, the respondent authorityshall pass a comprehensive order assigning reasons in support thereof.

243 Hari Parkash & Ors. (Lect.History) v/sState & Ors.


CWP 4590/18PGT-II

of 13503-01-2019


That being so, the petition is disposed of, at this stage, only with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the grievance/claim of the petitioner, as also his representation dated 30.05.2017 (Annexure P17), within a period of 8 weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order. And pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.Needless to assert that in the event the claim of the petitioner is declined, the respondent authority shall pass a comprehensive order assigning reasons insupport thereof.

244 Pankaj Chauhan (Lecturer Biology) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.fill up the vacant post of principal by way of promotion instead of direct recruitment


The factual position, as set out above, is not disputed by the learned State counsel, as he submits that the issue involved in the present lisis squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Jagat Singh Yadav (supra).In conspectus of the above, the petition is disposed of, in terms of the decision of this Court in Jagat Singh Yadav (supra).

245 Sunil Kumar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.





Reg.HTET/STET for the post of PGT Mathematics


27-05-2015CWP 4848/14PGT-I

of 13503-01-2019


Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority in the office of respondent No.2 to decide the legal notice dated December 23,2017 by passing a speaking order within three months of the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

247 Krishan Kumar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.


Directorate15-03-2018 13/137-18ME(5)File put up to Higher Authority

28-02-2018 14-06-2018CWP 4866/18HRME-II

That being so, the petition is disposed of, at this stage, only with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the claim/grievance of the petitioner, as also the legal notice dated 28.07.2017(Annexure P10), within a period of 3 months from the receipt of certified copy of this order. And pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.Needless to assert that in the event the claim of the petitioner is declined, the respondent-authorities shall pass a comprehensive order assigning reasons in support thereof.

248 Raj Kali v/sState & Ors.


Directorate27-03-2018 13/103-18ME(1)27-03-2018 26-06-2018CWP 4972/18HRME-II

of 13503-01-2019


The writ petition is allowed in view of thejudgment passed by this Court in CWP No.7626 of 2015 titled as Gurmail Kaur andothers Vs. State of Haryana and anotherdecided on 27.5.2015.CWP NO.7626 OF 2015 ORDERSIn view of what has been observed above,Annexures P-9 and P-10 are hereby quashed. Writ petitions are accordingly allowed. The respondents are directed to issue appointment letters to the petitioners by putting a condition in the same manner as has been put while issuing appointment letters to the candidates who have challenged the exemption clause vis-à-vis sitting in HTET/STET examination forthwith. The respondents are also directed to issue re-appointment letters to the petitioners, whose seravices have been dispensed with by putting the same condition.

249 Raman Kumari & Ors. PGT English in Aarohi School v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Extension in Service

Directorate14-08-2015 LPA filed by the department, the Hon'ble High Court granted stay

27-05-2015CWP 50/14Aarohi Cell

In response, learned State counsel submits that theclaim/grievance of the petitioner shall be considered and dealt with by the respondent authorities within a period of two weeks from today. And appropriate orders in accordance with law, shall be passed andcommunicated to the petitioner.The petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms.However, in the event the claim of the petitioner is declined, the respondent authorities shall pass a comprehensive order assigning reasons in supportthereof.

250 Naveen Lata v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Appointment for the post of Statistical Assistant

Directorate30-03-2018 13/136-18ME(4)File put up to Higher Authority on 13.04.18

08-03-2018 22-03-2018CWP 5231/18HRME-I

of 13503-01-2019


The factual position, as set out above, is not disputed by the learned State counsel, rather, he submits that let this petition be disposed ofin terms of the decision of this Court, referred to above.That being so, the petition is disposed of, in terms of the decision of this Court in Jagat Singh Yadav (supra).

251 Parveen Kumar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.


CWP 5251/18HR(G-I)

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2-The Director, Secondary Education, Haryana, Siksha Sadan, Sector 5, Panchkula to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioners in legal notice dated28.11.2017 (Annexure P-14) and to decide the same as per Rules and in the light of judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 16084 of 1997, captioned as “Dharampal Singh v. State of Haryana and ors”, decided on 27.07.2000(Annexure P-8) as well as CWP No.5563-A of 1989, within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.However, if the petitioners still feel aggrieved against any of the order(s) passed by the concerned authority, they shall be at liberty to have recourse to the other remedies available to them as well as to approach this Court

252 Siri Ram & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Refixation of pay


The factual position, as set out above, is not disputed by the learned State counsel, who rather submits that the matter is indeed covered by the decision of this Court in the case of R.K. Verma and others (supra) and be disposed of in terms thereof.Ordered accordingly.

253 Ram Kumar Pannu & Ors. v/sState & Ors.


CWP 5286/18HR(G-I)

of 13503-01-2019


The factual position, as set out above, is not disputed by the learned State counsel, who rather submits that the matter is indeed covered by the decision of this Court in the case of R.K. Verma and others (supra) and be disposed of in terms thereof.Ordered accordingly.

254 Harish Kumar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Selection GradeDirectorate28-03-201814-03-2018

CWP 5292/18HR(G-I)

That being so, the petition is disposed of, at this stage, only with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners as also their representation, dated 18.12.2017 (Annexure P-4), within a period of three months from the receipt of a certified copy of this order. And, pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. In the event, the claim of the petitioners is declined, the authority shall pass a comprehensiveorder assigning reasons in support thereof.

255 Sandeep & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.HRADirectorate28-03-201806-03-2018 27-06-2018

CWP 5332/18PGT-II

Let the exercise be completed within one month from the date of receiving of certified copy of this order. In case, hearing of the petitioners is necessary, then order be passed within one month thereafter. In the event, the petitioners are found entitled to the stepping of pay, then arrears becalculated and paid to them within the next two months. However, actual payment is restricted to the three years prior to the filing of the petition andthe previous years will carry only notional benefits.With these observations and directions, the petition stands disposed of.

256 Ram Swaroop & Anr. (Lab Attendant) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Step up of payDirectorate06-04-2018 13/134-18ME(3)07-03-2018 05-05-2018

CWP 5422/18HRME-I

of 13503-01-2019



257 Naresh Kumar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Consider for the post of PGT Hindi/English


27-05-2015CWP 5568/14PGT-I

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2-The Director, Secondary Education, Haryana, Siksha Sadan, Sector 5, Panchkula to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioners in legal notice dated28.11.2017 (Annexure P-14) and to decide the same as per Rules and in the light of judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 16084 of 1997, captioned as “Dharampal Singh v. State of Haryana and ors”, decided on 27.07.2000(Annexure P-8) as well as CWP No.5563-A of 1989, within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.However, if the petitioners still feel aggrieved against any of the order(s) passed by the concerned authority, they shall be at liberty to have recourse to the other remedies available to them as well as to approach this Court

258 Lal Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Benefit of refixation of pay after restoring the benefits of adhoc relief and DA cut as on 01.04.1979


of 13503-01-2019


Learned State counsel submits that the claim/grievance of the petitioners as also their legal notice, dated 29.11.2017 (Annexure P-10),shall be considered and dealt with within a period of eight weeks from today. And appropriate orders, in accordance with law, shall be passed.The petition is accordingly disposed of, in the above terms. However, in the event the claim of the petitioners is declined, the respondent authorities shall pass a comprehensive order assigning reasons in support thereof.

259 Jagpal Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.



Since other similarly situated persons have been granted the benefit, we therefore dispose of the appeal with a direction to the respondents that consideration be granted to the appellant as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Result of the appellant is returned back to the learned State counsel.

260 Anil Kumar v/sState & Ors.


Directorate30-10-201815-10-2018 27-11-2018LPA 568/17 in CWP No.2102/13Coordination


261 Sudhir & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Promotion for the post of PGT


18-12-2017CWP 5753/17PGT-II

In view of what has been observed above, the writ petitions are allowed and the directions are issued to the respondents to call the petitioners for counselling and issue the appointment letters to them for the post of PGT in respect of categories for which they have been appeared orinterviewed. The petitioners are also entitled for consequential benefit of seniority.

262 Subhash Chand v/sState & Ors.

REg.Consider for the post of PGT Hindi

Directorate07-07-2015 The Hon'ble High Court granted stay in LPA No.1220 of 2015 against the order dt.04.06.15

04-06-2015CWP 5781/15PGT-I

of 13503-01-2019


Accordingly, the writ petition is liable to be allowed with costs which are imposed to the tune of Rs.10,000/- upon Smt. Suman Lata, District Education Officer who had filed the reply and has vehemently opposed the reappointment of the petitioner on solely untenable grounds.Accordingly, directions are issued to respondent no. 2 to adjust the petitioner as a guest faculty on the same terms and conditions as earlier within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. Preference be given to her appointment in Government Senior Secondary School, Khanpur Kalan as it has been informed by the counsel for the petitioner as per communication dated 05.12.2017 that there are two sanctioned posts available in the said school.

263 Sudesh Kumar, Lect.Hindi v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Termination of Service due to not having requisite qualification


That being so, the petition is disposed of, at this stage, only with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the claim/grievance of the petitioner as also his legal notice, dated 23.8.2017 (Annexure P-9), within a period of three months from the receipt of a certified copy of this order. And, pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. In the event, the claim of the petitioner is declined, the authority shall pass a comprehensiveorder assigning reasons in support thereof.(

264 Anoop Singh v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Count previous service for the purpose of pay fixation


of 13503-01-2019


Presuming that the observation made by a quasi-judicial authority is in consonance with the actual facts, I dispose of this petition with a direction that in case the petitioner approaches the State Information Officer-cum-Superintendent of the office of Director, Secondary Education,Branch PGT-II, and the Director, School Education, Panchkula, within a period of one month, the information pertaining to points No. 2, 3 and 4which is alleged to have been supplied to the petitioner on 20.07.2016 (as recorded in order of the State Information Commissioner, Haryana dated29.08.2016, the information at points No. 2, 3 and 4 will be re-supplied to the petitioner at the cost of the petitioner.In case of non-compliance of this order, it will be open to the petitioner to approach this Court again.

265 Sunil Kumar Bansal v/sState & Ors.

Reg.RTI information regarding surplus of some Lecturer


For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.5781 of 2015 (SubhashChand Versus State of Haryana & others), decided on 4.6.2015.

266 Yatender Kumar v/sState & Ors.



04-06-2015CWP 6020/15PGT-I


267 Vinti Gulati v/sState & Ors.



04-06-2015CWP 6024/15PGT-I

of 13503-01-2019


Petitioners have been found entitled for the requisite amount of grant-in-aid for the posts held by them. Accordingly, respondent no.1 isdirected to release the requisite amount of grant-in-aid for the posts held by the petitioners, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, failing which petitioners shall be entitled for receiving the amount of grant-in-aid for the posts held by them, alongwith interest @ 12% p.a. from the date the amount became due till its payment.Resultantly, with the abovesaid observations made and directions issued, instant writ petition stands allowed, however, with no order as to costs.

268 Mahadev & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Release Arrear of pay of account of revision of pay scales

Directorate27-11-2014 Recovery Stayed.State filed LPA No.933/15 filed on 29.06.15 and same is fixed for hearing on 26.10.17

01-10-2014 26-02-2015CWP 604/94HR(AS)

That being so, the petition is disposed of, at this stage, only with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the claim/grievance of the petitioner as also his representation, dated 27.12.2016 (Annexure P-5) within a period of three months from the receipt of a certified copy of thisorder. And, pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. In the event, the claim of the petitioner is declined, the authority shall pass a comprehensiveorder, assigning reasons in support thereof.

269 Karam Singh v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Promote as Lecturer Geography w.e.f. the year 2005-06 when become eligible for promotion



270 Baby Goyal v/sState & Ors.



04-06-2015CWP 6169/15PGT-I

of 13503-01-2019


Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2-The Director, Primary Education, Forest Building, Sector 17, Chandigarh to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioners in the representation dated 09.12.2017 (P-7) and to decide the same as per Rules and in the light ofjudgments referred to above in para no.1 of this order, within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case ofnon compliance of this order, petitioners shall be at liberty to have recourse to the other remedies available to them as well as to approach this Court.

271 Chanderbhan Sharma & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Refixation of pay & pension


As to this, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the claim/grievance of the petitioners as also their legal notice dated 21.11.2017 (Annexure P-8), shall be considered and dealt with within a period of three months from today. And, appropriate orders, in accordance with law, shall be passed.The petition is accordingly, disposed of, in the above terms.However, in the event, the claim of the p e t i t i o n e r s i s d e c l i n e d , t h e respondents-authority shall pass a comprehensive order assigning reasons in support thereof.

272 Geeta Devi v/sState & Ors.




273 Khazan Singh v/sState & Ors.


Directorate13-07-2015 Deemed University MatterThe Hon'ble High Court granted stay in LPA No.1220 of 2015 against the order dt.04.06.15 passed in CWP No.5781/15 titled as Subhash Chand Vs. State of Haryana

04-06-2015CWP 6277/15PGT-I

of 13503-01-2019



274 Savita Rani v/sState & Ors.



04-06-2015CWP 6289/15PGT-I

Instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No.1 to 4 to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in the legal notices and to take a conscious decision by passing a speaking order considering all the facts narrated in the aforesaid legal notices within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. In case, competent authorities comes to the conclusion that petitioner is entitled to the relief(s) claimed, same be released to him within a period of next 45 days. Factum of interest in view of judgment passed by Full Bench of this Court in case A.S.Randhawa vs. State of Punjab and others, 1997 (3) SCT, 468 as well as judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 8772 of 2015 captioned as Charan Dass vs. State of Punjab and others decided on 11.07.2017 and Instructions No. 1/2(152)01-2 FR II dated20.02.2002, issued by the Government of Haryana, be also considered on delayed payment(s).5. However, if petitioner still feels aggrieved by any of the orderspassed by the aforesaid authority, he shall be at liberty to approach thisCourt.

275 Harish Chander v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Release the pensionary benefits

Directorate04-04-2018 13/123-18ME(3)Information awaited from DEO Karnal

14-03-2018 03-06-2018CWP 6292/18HRME-I

of 13503-01-2019


In our considered view, unless the Rule is found to be inconsistent with any Constitutional provision or a Statute or against publicpolicy, it would not be expedient for a Writ Court to interfere with it and assume the role of Rule Making Authority. The amendment, substitution or streamlining of the existing provisions, essentially falls within the purview of Rule Making Authority. It is thus not necessary to express any views on merits, rather we deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with adirection to respondent No.1 to entertain this petition as a representation on behalf of the petitioner and consider his grievance in accordance with the State policy. It shall be appreciated if an appropriate decision is takenwithin a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The petitioner shall be required to send a copy of the writ petition alongwith certified copy of this order to respondent No.1.Ordered accordingly.Further the petitioner belongs to reserve category of Scheduled Caste. He claims that under the Rules there is a provision to give relaxation to the Scheduled Caste and backward class candidates. If such relaxation is permissible qua academic qualification also, the authorities are directed to consider the petitioner's claim for that relaxation as well.Needless to say that if the petitioner's claim is accepted, then he will also be entitled to call for the interview as per his merit.Dasti.(

276 Rakesh Kumar v/sState & Ors.

Reg. HTETDirectorate13-02-2017 Relaxation in HTET

Marks17-01-2017 27-02-2017


of 13503-01-2019


Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners regarding pay anomaly and decide the legal notices by passing a reasoned order on them in the light of the case law relied upon by the petitioners. Let the exercise be completed within 8 weeks from the date of receiving of certified copy of this order.

277 Ranbir Singh & Ors. (Lect.in.Pol.Sci.) v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant the benefit of selection grade



278 Shakuntla Devi v/sState & Ors.



04-06-2015CWP 6381/15PGT-I


279 Harvinder Kaushal v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Quashing the impugned order dt. 18.01.14 (P-12) and notice dated nil (P-13) to the extent of denying counseling for issuing appointment letter to the candidates like the petitioners who have acquired their qualification of Post Graduate from IASE


27-05-2015CWP 6501/14PGT-I

of 13503-01-2019


In view of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in her representation dated 08.01.2018 (P-6) inaccordance with law, rules and regulations, within a period of three months from the date of receipts of certified copy of this order. However, in case the petitioner feels dissatisfied by any inaction of the authorities concerned, she shall be at liberty to have recourse to the other remedies available under the law, including to approach this Court.

280 Shashi sood v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Revision of pension w.e.f. 01.11.07 on account of her notional pay fixation in the revised pay scale of Re.7500-12000 w.e.f. 01.01.96



281 Balwan Singh v/sState & Ors.



04-06-2015CWP 6584/15PGT-I

of 13503-01-2019


These two aspects have neither explained in the written statement nor the learned Assistant Advocate General had been able to show me how the action can be justified. In the circumstances, I have no option but to set aside the impugned order of the termination of the services. However that would not result in automatic release of consequential benefits to the petitioner. It is directed that the respondents would issue her regular chargesheet within 1 month from the date of the receipt of a certified copy of this order. Thepetitioner would be granted a period of 30 days to file reply. Thereafter the respondents would have 3 effective dates spread over a period of 2 months to lead their evidence and similarly the petitioner would get 3 opportunities spread over 2 months to lead her evidence. The disciplinary proceedings must be completed on or before 31.12.2017 and any consequential relief to thepetitioner would be dependent on the order to be passed in the disciplinary proceedings. In case the disciplinary proceedings are not completed on or before 31.12.2017 (subject to the petitioner not obstructing the same) shewould be entitled to all consequential benefits of this order setting aside her termination and would be entitled to all retiral benefits also.The instant petition stands disposed of in the above terms. A copy of this order be handed over the learned Assistant Advocate General as well as learned counsel for the petitioner under the signature of the Bench Secretary so that time limits can be adhered to.Since the main case has been decided, the pending Civil Misc.Application, if any, also stands disposed of.

282 Rekha Dhariwal v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Experience Certificate produced at the time of Appointment as Principal found forged and false

Directorate08-06-2017 Charge sheet has been issued. Reply is still awaited from petitioner. File No.5/83-10 G-I has already been sent to W.ACSSE on 14.09.18, after inquiring for decision

07-07-2017CWP 66/14HR(G-I)

of 13503-01-2019



283 Mamta Sharma v/sState & Ors.

REg.Consider for the post of PGT Hindi


04-06-2015CWP 6608/15PGT-I


284 Shakuntla Devi v/sState & Ors.



04-06-2015CWP 6696/15PGT-I


285 Abhilasha Arora v/sState & Ors.



04-06-2015CWP 6779/15PGT-I


286 Bela Rani v/sState & Ors.



04-06-2015CWP 6781/15PGT-I

of 13503-01-2019






04-06-2015CWP 6784/15PGT-I

Instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2- Director, Secondary Education, Haryana, Shiksha Sadan, Sector 5, Panchkula tolook into the grievances unfolded by the petitioners in legal notices (Annexures P-8 to P-10) and to decide the same as per rules, regulations and instructions as well as in the light of Jagat Singh Yadav's case (supra) (Annexure P-7), withina period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.4. However, if the petitioners still feel aggrieved against the order passed by the concerned authority, they shall be at liberty to have recourse tothe other remedies as well as to approach this Court.

288 Harish Chander & Ors. v/sState & Ors.


CWP 6824/18HR(G-I)


289 Phool Kumar v/sState & Ors.



04-06-2015CWP 6901/15PGT-I

of 13503-01-2019



290 Anil Kumar v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Consider for the post of PGT Sanskrit


04-06-2015CWP 6904/15PGT-I

Like in CWP No. 4376 of 2018 titled as Mahender Pal and another Vs. State of Haryana and another disposed of on 22.02.2018, this petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to treatthe petition as a representation and to decide the same in accordance with law as was directed in the above mentioned petition.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no fresh date has been notified for the transfer process. It is expected that the grievance of the petitioner will be looked into before the cases of transfer are taken up.The petition is disposed of as above.

291 Subhash Chand v/sState & Ors.


CWP 7047/18Academic


292 Dhanpat Devi v/sState & Ors.



04-06-2015CWP 7057/15PGT-I

of 13503-01-2019


Contends, that the matter involving an identical issue, i.e. CWP No. 29946 of 2017 (Sanjay Kumar and others Vs. State of Haryana and another), has since been disposed of by this Court, vide order and judgment dated 29.1.2018, the matter at hands too be disposed of in the same terms.Ordered accordingly

293 Jagdish & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant the benefit of advanced increments in lieu of higher qualification



294 Rajesh v/sState & Ors.



04-06-2015CWP 7145/15PGT-I

That being so, the petition is disposed of, at this stage, only with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner, as also legal notice dated 11.12.2017 (Annexure P-5), within a period of eight weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order. And pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. In the event, the claim of the petitioner is declined, the respondents-authority shall pass a comprehensive order assigning reasons in support thereof.

295 Sher Mohd. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Promotion for the post of Lecturer in Political Science

Directorate04-04-2018 File put up to W.ACSSE for approval

22-03-2018 30-05-2018CWP 7194/18PGT-III

of 13503-01-2019


In view of what has been observed above, Annexures P-9 and P-10 are hereby quashed. Writ petitions are accordingly allowed. Therespondents are directed to issue appointment letters to the petitioners by putting a condition in the same manner as has been put while issuing appointment letters to the candidates who have challenged the exemption clause vis-à-vis sitting in HTET/STET examination forthwith. The respondents are also directed to issue re-appointment letters to the petitioners, whose services have been dispensed with by putting the same condition.

296 Gurmail Kaur & Ors v/sState & Ors.


Directorate16-07-2015 Deemed University Matter The Hon'ble High Court granted stay in LPA No.1215 of 2015 against the order dt.27.05.15

27-05-2015CWP 7626/15PGT-I

of 13503-01-2019


For order, see judgment of even date passed in CWP No.25682 of 2014, Arun Singh & others Vs. State of Haryana & another.

ORDER IN CWP No.25682 of 2014,

Resultantly, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioners would be entitled for appointment against the vacant seats which were neverconsumed being in the zone of consideration and accordingly, the writ petitions are allowed. The petitioners shall be offered appointment lettersand the State should operate the merit list in the respective categories in the subjects of English, Hindi, and Biology. In case there are persons senior in merit than the petitioners, they will firstly be offered the said posts and in case the vacancies still exist, the petitioners will be accommodated. The necessary exercise be concluded within a period of two months from thedate of receipt of certified copy of the judgment.

297 Sonu Rani v/sState & Ors.




298 Parmila Rani v/sState & Ors.



04-06-2015CWP 7773/15PGT-I

of 13503-01-2019


The present writ petition is allowed in terms of order dated 04.06.2015 passed in CWP No.5781 of 2015 titled as Subhash Chand vs. State of Haryana and others.

299 Uma Rani v/sState & Ors.



29-06-2015CWP 7872/15PGT-I

Learned State counsel submits that the claim/grievance of the petitioner, as also his legal notice dated 20.02.2018 (Annexure P8), shall be considered and dealt with by the respondents within a period of three months from today. And, appropriate orders, in accordance with law, shall be passed and communicated to the petitioner.The petition is accordingly, disposed of, in the above terms. However, in the event the claim of the petitioner is declined, the respondent-authorities shall pass a comprehensive order assigning reasons in support thereof.

300 Shiv Narayan Verma v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant the benefit of antedated promotion with all consequential benefits w.e.f. 01.01.96

Directorate26-04-2018 File sent to PGT-Ii vide letter No.6/49-18G-I (2) dt.14.06.18, reminder also given on 09.08.18 for fixation of seniority. Report is still awaited

02-04-2018 01-07-2018CWP 7951/18HR(G-I)


301 Kanwar Singh & Anr. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Promotion for the post of Lecturer Sociology


18-12-2017CWP 8053/13PGT-II

of 13503-01-2019


In response, learned State counsel submits that claim/grievance of the petitioner as also his legal notice, dated 8.11.2017 (Annexure P-11), shall be considered and decided within a period of three months from today.And appropriate orders, in accordance with law, shall be passed and communicated to the petitioner.The petition is accordingly disposed of, in the above terms. In the event, the claim of the petitioner is declined, the authority shall pass a comprehensive order assigning reasons in support thereof

302 Sube Singh v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Deemed date of regularization of service


In view of the above, let the petitioner now submit arepresentation to the Divisional Commissioner, Ambala within a period of two weeks from today. If such a representation is made, the same shall beconsidered and decided by the Committee within a period of eight weeks from the date of submission of the representation. Decision so taken beconveyed to the petitioner forthwith.Application stands disposed of accordingly.Copy of the order be given dasti to the counsel for the parties under signatures of the Bench Secretary of this Court.

303 Shriom v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Forced to petitioner to purchase the books and note books

Directorate31-03-2017 Matter is to be decided by FFRC Ambala

10-03-2017 20-05-2017C.M 8098/15 in CWP No.23933/13HR(PS)

In this view of the matter, we dispose of this writ petition without expressing any views on merits, with a direction to the authorities to examine the claim of the petitioners as contained in the above-mentioned legal notice and decide the same by way of reasoned order within a period of six months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

304 Krishan Kumar v/sState & Ors.


CWP 8113/17PGT-I

of 13503-01-2019


That being so, the petition is disposed of, at this stage, only with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner, as also the legal notice dated 25.01.2018 (Annexure P6), within a period of three months from the receipt of a certified copy of this order.And, pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. In the event, the claim of the p e t i t i o n e r i s d e c l i n e d , t h e respondent-authority shall pass acomprehensive order assigning reasons in support thereof.

305 Guru Ditta v/sState & Ors.



Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in the legal notice dated17.03.2016 (P-7) and to take a conscious decision by passing a speaking order, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certifiedcopy of this order. However, if petitioner still feels aggrieved by any of the orders passed by the aforesaid authority, she shall be at liberty to approach this Court.

306 Sheela Vinodia v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Count the service of 04 years & 10 months rendered by him in the Education Department, Punjab towards pensionary benefits as per pension rules and settled proposition of law with all consequential benefits i.e. revision ofpension and all other pensionary benefits, arrears of pension along with interest @ 18% per annum from the date due till payment

Directorate30-04-2018 Matter is under consideration & letter is issued to DEO,Panchkula

04-04-2018 29-07-2018CWP 8254/18HR(G-I)

of 13503-01-2019


In response, learned State counsel submits that claim/grievance of the petitioners as also their legal notice, dated 29.1.2018 (Annexure P-12), shall be considered and decided within a period of three months from today.And appropriate orders, in accordance with law, shall be passed.The petition is accordingly disposed of, in the above terms. In the event, the claim of the petitioners is declined, the authority shall pass a comprehensive order assigning reasons in support thereof.

307 Liyakat Ali & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Promotion for the post of PGT


That being so, the petition is disposed of, at this stage, only with a direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner, as also her legal notice, dated 16.1.2018 (Annexure P-5), within a period of three months from the receipt of certified copy of this order. And pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. In the event the claim of the petitioner is declined, the respondent authority shall pass a comprehensiveorder assigning reasons in support thereof.

308 Krishna v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Regularization of Service w.e.f. 25.08.14 instead of 01.04.11


For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No.7626 of 2015 (Gurmail Kaur & others Versus State of Haryana & another), decided on 27.5.2015.

309 Pawan Kumar, v/sState & Ors.



27-05-2015CWP 8297/14PGT-I

of 13503-01-2019



310 Bharat Bhushan & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Consider for the post of PGT Hindi, Eng & Mathematics


27-05-2015CWP 8437/15PGT-I

That being so, the petition is disposed of, at this stage, only with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners, as also their legal notice, dated 6.1.2018 (Annexure P-12), within a period of three months from the receipt of certified copy of this order. And pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. In the event the claim of the petitioners is declined, the respondent authority shall pass a comprehensiveorder assigning reasons in support thereof.

311 Kamla v/sState :& Ors.



Respondent-Institution is hereby directed to release HRA to the petitioner immediately. Insofar as reimbursement from the Government,, they are directed to move necessary application or reminder to the concerned State-respondent. If such reminder/application is moved by the respondent-institution to the Government, concerned respondent is hereby directed to decide the Institution's application for grant in aid within aperiod of 3 months from today.With the above observation petition stands disposed of.

312 Managing Committee MLA Sr.Sec.School Jatauli v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Release Grant-in-Aid

Directorate13-02-2018 4/67-14 AS(2)30-05-2017 29-08-2017CWP 8609/14HR(AS)

of 13503-01-2019


Instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in legal notice dated 03.10.2017 (P-5) and to take a conscious decision in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. However, if petitioner still feels aggrieved by any of the orders passed by the aforesaid authorities, she shall be at liberty to have recourse to theremedies available under law as well as to approach this Court.

313 Rajpati v/sState & Ors.



Instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to consider the grievances unfolded by the petitioners in the legal notice dated 16.11.2017 (P-11) and to take a conscious decision by passing aspeaking order as per rules, regulations and instructions issued by the Government from time to time particularly in view of the judgments referred to above in the legal notice, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. However, if petitioners still feel aggrieved by any of the orders passed by the aforesaid authority, they shall be at liberty to approach this Court.

314 Ashok Kumar sharma & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Grant the benefit of selection grade w.e.f.01.01.96 instead of 01.08.2000


of 13503-01-2019


In response, learned counsel for the respondents submit that the claim/grievance of the petitioner as also her representation dated 1.3.2018(Annexure P-11), shall be considered and dealt with within a period of four weeks from today. And, appropriate orders, in accordance with law, shallbe passed.The petition is accordingly, disposed of, in the above terms. However, in the event, the claim/grievance of the petitioner is declined, the respondents-authority shall pass a comprehensive order assigning reasonsin support thereof.

315 Pooja Saharawat v/sState & Ors.



At this stage, the present petition is disposed of by giving direction to the Director, Secondary Education-respondent No.2 to look into legal notice dated 08.11.2017 (Annexure P-3) and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law bytaking into consideration CWP No. 14622-2018, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

316 Rajo Devi v/sState & Ors.



he writ petition is allowed in view of thejudgment passed by this Court in CWP No.7626 of 2015 titled as Gurmail Kaur andothers Vs. State of Haryana and anotherdecided on 27.5.2015.

317 Shikha Sharma v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Appointment/Selection for the post of PGT Mathematics


27-05-2015CWP 9035/14PGT-I

of 13503-01-2019


In these circumstances, without issuing notice to the opposite party, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondentNo. 2 to consider the legal notice dated 12.7.2016 (Annexure-P-8) of the petitioners and decide the same after considering the Division Bench judgment of this Court in Parkash Chand Sharma's case (supra) and other relevant law on the point, within two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

318 Murli Dhar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg. The qualifying service should be treated from the date of their joining the service, in terms of a Division Bench judgment of this Court, passed in LPA-1318-2015, titled as State of Haryana and others Parkash Chand Sharma and others, alongwith connected cases, decided on 21.3.2017

Directorate19-05-2017 Case put up to Higher Authority

01-05-2017 18-07-2017CWP 9153/17PEN-II

That being so, the petition is disposed of, at this stage, only with a direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners, as also their legal notice, dated 2.1.2018 (Annexure P-9), within a period of three months from the receipt of certified copy of this order. And pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. In the event the claim of the petitioners is declined, the respondent authority shall pass a comprehensiveorder, assigning reasons in support thereof.

319 Shalender & Anr. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Deemed date of regularization


That being so, the petition is disposed of, at this stage, only with a direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner, as also her legal notice, dated 11.1.2018 (Annexure P-6), within a period of three months from the receipt of certified copy of this order. And pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. In the event the claim of the petitioner is declined, the respondent authority shall pass a comprehensiveorder, assigning reasons in support thereof.

320 Shimla Devi v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Deemed date of regularization with all consequential benefits


of 13503-01-2019


Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents to look into the grievancesunfolded by the petitioner in legal notice dated 25.07.2017 (P-8) and to decide the same in accordance with rules and instructions issued by government from time to time, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certifiedcopy of this order. However, if petitioner still feels aggrieved by any order of the aforesaid authority, she shall be at liberty to approach this Court.

321 Jeeta Devi v/sState & Ors.



he writ petition is allowed in view of thejudgment passed by this Court in CWP No.7626 of 2015 titled as Gurmail Kaur andothers Vs. State of Haryana and anotherdecided on 27.5.2015.

322 Abheyender Singh v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Select/Appoint for the post of PGT English


27-05-2015CWP 9253/14PGT-I

In response, learned State counsel submits that the claim as also the grievance of the petitioner, as set out in the petition, shall be considered and dealt with within a period of three months from today and appropriate orders, in accordance with law, shall be passed.That being so, the petition is disposed of in the above terms.Needless to assert that in the event the claim of the petitioner is declined, the respondent authorities shall pass a comprehensive order assigning reasons in support thereof.

323 Asha Rani v/sState & Ors.


CWP 9337/17PGT-II

of 13503-01-2019


In response, learned State counsel submits that claim/grievance of the petitioners shall be considered and dealt with by the respondents,within a period of eight weeks from today. And appropriate orders, in accordance with law, shall be passed.The petition is accordingly disposed of, in the above terms. In the event, the claim of the petitioners is declined, the authority shall pass a comprehensive order, assigning reasons in support thereof.

324 Krishan Kumar & Ors. v/sState & Ors.



That being so, the petition is disposed of, at this stage, only with a direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner, as also his legal notice, dated 15.1.2018 (Annexure P-6), within a period of three months from the receipt of certified copy of this order. Andpass appropriate orders in accordance with law. In the event the claim of the petitioner is declined, the respondent authority shall pass a comprehensiveorder, assigning reasons in support thereof

325 Gurdeep Singh v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Deemed date of Regularization


In view of this, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to the competent authority amongst the respondents to decide the aforesaid legal notice by passing a speaking order and if necessary hearing the petitioner within two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.With these observations and directions, the petition stands disposed of.

326 Krishna Devi v/sState & Ors.



of 13503-01-2019


In our considered view, unless the rule is found to be inconsistent with any Constitutional provision or a Statute or against publicpolicy, it would not be expedient for a Writ Court to interfere with it and assume the role of Rule Making Authority. The amendment, substitution or streamlining of the existing provisions, is essentially an exercise within the purview of Rule Making Authority. It is thus not necessary to express any views on merits, rather we deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.1 to entertain this petition as a representation on behalf of the petitioner and consider his grievance inaccordance with the State policy. It shall be appreciated if the appropriate decision is taken within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. The petitioner shall be required to send a copyof the writ petition alongwith certified copy of this order to respondent No.1.Ordered

327 Satish Kumar v/sState & Ors.

Reg.HTETDirectorate14-03-201719-01-2017 13-07-2017


of 13503-01-2019


Counsel states that Naveen Gautam has also been relieved to join at Yamuna Nagar. He relies on the administrative precedent. He cites other instances where government have transferred PGTs fromMewat to different cadres and there was no rider put in those transfer and posting orders. Since there is administrative precedent, then in theconsidered opinion of this Court, and without expressing any final opinion on the issues involved, a direction should go to the respondent-Department to consider the legal notice/ representation dated 28.03.2018 which was forwarded by the District and Education Officer (Annex. P-13) to the quarters concerned (Director School Education, Panchkula).Accordingly, direction is issued to the competent authority to decide the representation in accordance with law by passing a speaking order in case the request of the petitioner has to be declined for any valid reason.Let the consideration take place without delay and within a period of a fortnight from the date of receiving of the certified copy of the order,since the matter relates to educational institutions where the students should not suffer by reasons of delay in posting teachers to their schools, of any kind.With these observations and directions, the present petition is disposed of.

328 Jitender Singh & Ors. v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Quashing the note 7 of endorsement of order dt.23.02.18(Annexure P-4) vide which PGT of Mewat Cadre have not been allowed to be relieved for joining the DIET

Directorate08-05-201820-04-2018 23-05-2018CWP 9574/18Academic

of 13503-01-2019


As regard to respondent No.2, we have heard learned counsel for the parties at a considerable length. It is not in dispute that the orderspassed by the District Education Officer, Haryana and Director, Secondary Education, Haryana in their appellate capacities, are separately underchallenge at the instance of the management in CWP Nos.24873 & 25087 of 2015, which is still pending and since the legality of those orders is yet to be determined by this Court, we find no justification to accept the claim for consequential benefits at the instance of respondent No.2, at this stage. Till the above-cited writ petitions are decided on merits, such a claim being premature, respondent No.2 is held entitled to arrears of pay only w.e.f. the date of the order of learned Single Judge in these proceedings i.e. from 01.04.2015 onwards. These directions are without prejudice to the rights of the parties which are sub-judice in above-stated pending writ petitions.(10) With these observations and directions, the instant appeal stands disposed of.

329 Arya High School Trust & Management Society v/sSushila Devi

Reg.Payment of Arrear of pay along with interest

Directorate29-11-2016 4/30-14 AS(2)Write to DEO Rohtak vide letter No.4/82-15 AS (4) dt. 04.5.17 for compliance the court orders and reminder also issued on 29.05.17, reminder also issued again on 23.10.18

20-09-2016LPA 975/15 in CWP No.2473/14HR(AS)

of 13503-01-2019


Since this Court has already directed that one post under the SC Category be kept reserved, the respondents are directed to allow the petitioner to take the examination in respect of the advertised posts of Principal. The respondents are also directed to take further steps in view of what has been observed above and make arrangement for conducting the examination of the petitioner, so that he would be able to take the same.It is expected that the respondents authorities would conduct the examination as early as possible preferably within a period of twomonths from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.

330 Dr.Rakesh v/sState & Ors.

Reg.Consider for the post of Principal

Directorate16-04-201511-03-2015 15-06-2015CWP 9887/13Aarohi Cell

The issue is open for the competent authority to look into in accordance with law by passing a speaking order. Accordingly, the instantpetition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the legal notice after hearing the petitioners or their representative/s effectively before assigning comprehensive reasons upon which thedecision is proposed to be passed. The decision be taken within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and conveyedto the petitioners within the same time frame. If relief is deserved, it may be granted without the necessity of passing a reasoned order.

331 Sushila & Ors. v/sState & Ors.



of 13503-01-2019

Judgement cum Complianced Report as on Dated 16-Dec-16

Documents

Transcript of Judgement cum Complianced Report as on Dated 16-Dec-16