Journey to Rest
-
Upload
d-a-blanc-phd -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Journey to Rest
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
1/29
Rest is relying on the presence of power
of God in such a way that we refuse to
accept as an outcome what our natural
senses deem hopeless.
The Journeyto RestObedience-Training for the
Devoted Disciple
Dr. Douglas A. Blanc, Sr.
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
2/29
1
2012
Dr. Douglas A. Blanc, Sr.
The Journey to Rest
The OT provides historical landmarks in a series of events which
illustrate several NT Christian life themes. The OT historical events
are used according to the admonition of Paul (Rom 15:4).
The theme of rest is found in the book of Hebrews (3:1-4:13; see Ps
95:7-11) and is mentioned there in contrast to s spirit of apostasy
(5:11-6:12). The writer of Hebrews declares, So then, there remains
a Sabbath rest for the people of God (4:9). The word Sabbath-
like rest combines the mention of rest in Ps 95:11(to settle down
in a place and be at rest from ones enemies) with Gods Sabbath rest
in Gen 2:2(a cessation of labor). It refers not to a particular place
(4:8), but is a condition entered into by complete trust in God when all
striving ceases (4:6).
So, rest is not the cessation of difficult experiences. It is not the removal of problems from our
life.Rest is relying on the presence of power of God in such a way that we refuse to accept as
an outcome what our natural senses deem hopeless (Phil 4:13; see also where sin is identified
as obstructing such trust, Isa 59:1-2; Num 11:16-23).
1. The Exodus (Exod 12:33-42):This event demonstrates God acting sovereignly to redeem his chosen people from a state of
bondage. Redemption is God securing the release of his people at his own expense (a purchase),doing so exclusively by the exercise of his power, and in a manner which attains his ultimate
glory.
The event is the culmination of God raising up a human instrument through whichhe made known his purpose while revealing his supremacy over the captors of
Israel (Exod 3:1-11:32). God could have abbreviated the process (Exod 9:15),
but desired to his supremacy proclaimed throughout the world.
In the NT God raised up his Son as the instrument through whom he declared hispurpose to the world; to reconcile guilty sinners to himself through the sacrifice of
his perfect substitute (Eph 1:7; 1 John 4:7-14; 2 Cor 5:17-19). He did this
according to his displayed power, glorifying himself by raising Jesus from the
dead (Eph 1:19-20).
We are living testaments (witnesses) who embody Gods redemptive mercy andgrace before a watching world (Tit 2:11-14).
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
3/29
2. The Red Sea Crossing (Exod 14:1-31):The event displayed to Israel and to the Egyptians that God intended to glorify himself by
preserving the people he had previously redeemed (purchased), vv. 17-19. Israel soon doubted
Gods intention to preserve them despite the awesome nature of this proof (Exod 17:1-7).
God intends to build (strengthen) our faith in the crucible of circumstancesbeyond our control in order to convince us that he intends to glorify himself
before a watching world through the refining process of our character (2 Cor
4:17; Jas 1:2-4; 1 Pet 1:6-7).
Faith is being absolutely convinced of Gods character when our own isinsufficient to cope with oppressive circumstances deemed out of control (Gen
22:1-14; Heb 11:17-19).
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
4/29
3
2012
Dr. Douglas A. Blanc, Sr.
3. The Giving of the Law at Sinai (Exod 19:1-31:18):God intended to establish a kingdom of priests consecrated to his revealed purposes (19:6). The
golden calf defection of the people while Moses remained on Sinai resulted in the sons of Levi
being chosen as priests for the service of Lord (28:1; 32:25-29).
Having departed Egypt, the nation of Israel had initiated a journey which Godintended to culminate in Canaan, the land he would give for them to live under the
terms of his covenant. This necessitated God revealing to his people the
stipulations whereby they might obediently demonstrate their loyalty and supreme
love to God (Deut 4:1-14; 6:1-4).
By virtue of the cross and the new covenant, God s original intention to establisha kingdom of priests has been fulfilled (1 Pet 2:9). We are called to live a
consecrated life to God and to manifest our loyalty to him by surrendering to the
will and dictates of his abiding Holy Spirit (Rom 8:2, 13-14; 1 Cor 6:19-20).
This consecrated life of devotion to God is essential to the spiritual journey whichleads us to our Canaan, the place where striving ceases and we experience perfect
rest under the assurances of Gods care (Ps 55:22; 1 Pet 5:7).
4. The Promised LandThe following are turning points mark the historical progression (or demise) of Israels spiritual
condition from the time of their Red Sea crossing to their entry into the Promised Land (second
generation), their subsequent expulsion from the land and final restoration to the land. From the
time of the Exodus and Red Sea crossing (1440 BC) to Nehemiahs Jerusalem wall construction(440 BC) spans nearly 1000 years of divine intervention to chasten and to restore the people of
God. A critical observation of this period concludes the loss of so much unrealized blessing from
God due to sin. Though the nation experienced Gods patient longsuffering, his forgiving nature
and gracious deliverance; these are no substitutes for the rapturous delight associated with his
pleasure and attending blessing. The trade-offs of sin are immense. Since we must strive in this
world, better that our striving be focused against sin and never against the revealed purposes of
God for his children (see Heb 12:1-4).
a) The struggle to get there:Following their miraculous Red Sea deliverance from the pursuing Egyptians to the time of their
anticipated entry into the Promised Land, a series of complaints against God plagued the nation
of Israel and left them bereft of divine blessing:
1) Unable to drink the bitter water at Marah (Heb. bitterness), the peoplegrumbled against Moses, What shall we drink? (Exod 15:24)
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
5/29
2) Barely one and one-half months since the Exodus, having departing thecomforts of Elim, a hungry, forgetful and ungrateful nation journeyed
toward Sinai through the Wilderness of Sin and grumbled against Moses
and Aaron (Exod 15:27-16:3).
3) Departing the Wilderness of Sin, the angry and thirsty nation camped atRephidim and quarreled with Moses, Give us water to drink. (Exod
17:1-2)
4) Having departed Rephidim and camped in the Wilderness of Sinai, thepeople became impatient and complained to Aaron about Moses delay on
the mountain (Exod 32:1-2), demanding gods to lead them. The act of
fashioning a Golden Calf was especially reprehensible to God since it was
in open rebellion to his expressed commandments (Exod 20:1-4) and also
since bull-calf worship (Apis) was practiced in the Memphis region of
Egypt.
5) Two years, two months and twenty days after the Exodus the cloud liftedfrom the tabernacle to lead the nation from the Wilderness of Sinai three-
days journey to the Wilderness of Paran (Num 10:11) where their
complaints of misfortune was heard by God (Num 11:1-3). God
responded with an outbreak of fire among the people in this place later
referred to as Taberah (Heb. burning).
6) No sooner had Gods mercy rescinded his fire-judgment that the peoplewept in complaint (Num 11:4). Ungrateful for the abundant supply ofmanna, they demanded their craving for meat be satisfied, recalling a
better diet during their days in Egypt (Num 11:5).
7) Miriam and Aaron complain against their brother Moses for his marriageto a Cushite woman (Num 12:1), perhaps identified with the Midianite
Zipporah (Exod 2:21) or one of the women among the mixed multitude
(Exod 12:38; Num 11:4). Regardless, the complaint was in open defiance
to the leader God appointed and with whom enjoyed a relationship
superior to that of a prophet (Num 12:6-8).
8) At the very threshold of the Promised Land, the people complained toMoses and Aaron (threatening to pelt Joshua and Caleb with stones),
preferring to have died in Egypt or the wilderness than to fall by the sword
in Canaan (Num 14:1-10). Note the presumption of their complaint; that
God had led them this far only to abrogate his promise and permit their
destruction or capture at the hands of their enemies.
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
6/29
5
2012
Dr. Douglas A. Blanc, Sr.
The above cases illustrate the enduring frailty of human nature. From the fall of mankind into
sin, the sin of ingratitude has been a moral blight on human nature (Gen 2:16-17; 3:3). Like
ancient Israel, our spirits soar with every positive circumstance which brings peace, satisfaction,
and contentment. We demand the removal of anything that resists our comfort and threatens our
security. How easily we are prone to grumbling and complaining about anything from the
weather, to personal relationships, to the quality and quantity of our possessions, to those in
authority over us; essentially anything that disrupts our happiness is grounds for complaint.
Given this human propensity for complaint, we as Christians should be aware of the following:
that all complaint is sin and all sin is ultimately directed toward God (Ps 51:4); that God calls us to a life of contentment, not on the basis of life-conditions (possessions,
relationships, the benevolent or malevolent nature of the authority over us), but on our
satisfaction in him (Isa 26:3;2 Cor 3:5; Phil 4:11-12);
that despite appearances, God is raining down daily blessings upon us (Jas 1:17); that regardless of our best logical conclusions from painful events, the God who has
mapped human history according to his good outcome, has also secured a similar path for
us (Rom 8:18-28);
that complaint only emphasizes our love for this world and by contrast (Matt 6:19-21;2 Tim 4:10; 1 John 15-17), a corresponding loss of desire for the next (Phil 1:23; Col
3:1-4; 2 Cor 4:16-18);
that the Spirit of God within us does not complain and it is his presence that must fill us(Gal 5:22-24); that complaint diminishes our witness to the world (Matt 5:11-12); and that habitual
gratitude resists a complaining spirit (Eph 5:20; 1 Thess 5:18).
b) The exclusion of some:Poised to enter the land promised by a God who repeatedly demonstrated his love and loyalty to
an ungrateful and complaining people; the people consistently resisted his will revealed through
leaders given to guide them to this place of rest. This same love and loyalty is demonstrated to
new covenant believers (Isa 42:6-8; 49:8-23), giving us pause at the thought of resisting after the
manner of our old covenant brothers and sisters (Rom 5:8; Matt 26:28; Luke 22:20; 1 Cor
11:25).
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
7/29
According to Num 14:11-45, a series of events unfolded from the ensuing rebellion of the people
unconvinced by the Joshua and Calebs reassuring report of Gods intention to give his best to
his people (Num 13:30; 14:6-9, 24). This resulted is a generation forfeiting the blessing of
occupying a land where their service to God would glorify his name in the earth (see Num
14:21). Only Joshua and Caleb whose hearts remained true to this purpose were not judged from
this rebellious generation and permitted entrance into the land. A survey of the events resulting
in exclusion of the rebellious:
1) The bad report of ten spies (Num 13:25-29, 31-33) induced fear andcomplaint among the people (Num 14:1-4). Their incessant complaining to
the brink of Canaan produced a terminal heart condition requiring little
convincing by the unfaithful spies to rebel against God (compare this episode
with Gen 6:5-8; see also Jer 17:9).
2) The righteous are exonerated, falling on their faces in remorse on behalf ofthe people, are spared destruction by the wicked through the intervention ofGod Num 14:5-10.
3) Judgment is pronounced upon the wicked who, instead of trusting, abhor,blaspheme and despise God; disinherited and disease-ridden, Moses will
become the nation purposed by God to inherit the land, Num 14:11-12.
4) Out of concern for the name/reputation of God (see 2 Chron 7:14), areputation which includes who he is and how his people are known by him (an
intimate relation in which a holy and otherwise unknowable and
unapproachable God has come near, Num 14:14), Moses intercedes on behalfof the wicked to ensure they remain as a lasting testament to the
unimpeachable character of God, Num 14:13-19.
5) God rescinds his judgment (except upon the men who brought the bad report,vv. 36-37), sparing the people from disease and disinheritance; they will
forever remain his people, but cared for (see v. 25) outside the land a
wilderness-wandering state of existence, Num 14:20-25 (see also Deut 8:4).
Caleb (also Joshua, vv. 30, 38) is mentioned (see v. 24) as the example and
the destiny of what might have been for the rest of the nation. Perhaps
knowing the blessings forfeited by sin is a worse estate than the judgment ofGod. Many Christians live in the wilderness, cared for by God as his beloved
children, forgiven, but having rebelled are suffering the consequences of
knowing what might have been (see Nathans pronouncement of David in 2
Sam 12:8).
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
8/29
7
2012
Dr. Douglas A. Blanc, Sr.
6) Recounted to the people are the consequences (curses) of sin (notice thatMoses is unmentioned in the exception (v. 30); God foreknowing his later
defection at Meribah, Num. 20:2-13?) and the blessings they have forfeited
(see Deut 30:11-20), Num 14:26-35. Though eventually entering the land, the
children suffer the collateral damage cause by sins they did not personally
commit (v. 33). Christians are not spared the collateral consequences of life in
a sin-filled world (see John 15:19; Phil 2:12-15; 1 Pet 2:12).
7) the reaction of the people was one ofbitter remorse (the sorrow of this world,see 2 Cor 7:10) and readiness to fulfill Gods original intention; the former
experience is realized while the later would forever be impossible. So too with
many Christians who by grace may recover from extreme moral failure, but
cannot un-ring the bell of rejecting Gods intended purpose for them. There is
grace, forgiveness, and restoration, but not of past time and lost opportunities
(see Joel 2:18-27). Remorse and not repentance is revealed when the people
resist God further in an attempt to override the consequences of sin by willful
persistence, Num 14:39-45. God is the author of opened and closed doors (see
Job 12:14; Rev 3:7).
New covenant believers are warned against resisting God and forfeiting the rest promised to
ancient Israel (see Heb 3:7-4:13). What are some ways we verbalize woeful departures from
God (i.e. by rejecting the clear teaching of his Word) which bring us to the brink of victorious
living only to leave us wandering in the wilderness of doubt, defeat, and despair?
1) What God is demanding of me does not reconcile with my evaluation of mycircumstances. Do we really know better than God? Obey and leave theconsequences to him.
2) What God is demanding of me does not reconcile with my beliefs about him;who he is and what he does. We are idolatrous when we fashion our own
mental image of God and worship the image based on conditions of our own
making. We must bring our most cherished beliefs in line with the Word of
God.
3) What God is demanding of me does not reconcile with my personal self-estimation of plans, goals, and preferred lifestyle. This is nominalChristianity at its best; paying lip-service to God with a lifeless and powerless
superficial faith. Repent and die to self.
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
9/29
4) What God is demanding of me does not reconcile with my consideration ofthose who do not know him. God demands obedience because the obedient
life is in subjection to him. A life in subjection to God glorifies his name in
the earth (i.e. calls attention to God and not to self). Emphasize the lost plight
of souls rather than felt personal needs (Ezek 3:16-21; Rom 10:1; 1 Cor
9:16).
5) What God is demanding of me does not reconcile with my understanding ofhis best for my life. This is the hallmark confession of rebellion. It indicates
the seminal struggle of wills in a battle with God we cannot win and must not
fight (the sin of preferring all things worldly is the root cause, see Rom 8:7;
1 Cor 3:1). We must become convinced (by means of the Spirit) that the best
is the byproduct of complete resignation to God in our present circumstances.
Many Christian wrongly believe that when God changes their negative
circumstances they will then serve him fully. This makes obedience
conditioned on what God must do for us and not on what we are obligated to
do for him. Someone is on the throne of our lives. It is either the LORD Jesus
Christ, or me. Choose and live accordingly! If self is enthroned you need only
read Number Chapter 14 to analyze your present and view your future. If
Christ is enthroned, Gods best is 100% guaranteed, regardless of the
circumstances.
c) Entrance into the land:After 40 years of sequester in the wilderness, the time for the remaining people of God to enter
the land he promised their fathers arrived. A series of speeches given by Moses to the people ofGod are contained in the book of Deuteronomy and detail his reminiscences of their history and
the central role the law of God would play in living as his people in their own land when their
wandering ceased.
The book of Deuteronomy (lit. second law) is more than a mere retelling of the nations
history, it is a dramatic portrayal of the implications of choices and decisions in relation to law of
God, the consequences of resistance, and the blessings which await the devoted. As the writer of
Hebrews indicates, the rest for the people of God was/is not associated with entering and
occupying the land of promise, but in following the manner of life prescribed by God through the
law in the land (Heb 4:8-13).
Conformity to the law resulted in peace along their borders and the attending blessings which
flowed from God out of fidelity to his ways. Neglect of the law, or modification to the law,
resulted in a loss of rest, hostility along their borders, the judgment of God upon their lives, and
eventual expulsion from the land.
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
10/29
9
2012
Dr. Douglas A. Blanc, Sr.
The chart below details the spiritual significance of the events occurring in the lives of the
Israelites with a view to new covenant expectations in Christ.
We will survey the speeches of Moses in order to appreciate the role of the law to the spiritual
formation of the people of God seeking rest in the land of promise.
1. The 40-year time of wandering ends the nation of Israel under the direction ofMoses defeated the Amorite king Sihon and the Bashan king Og and were
positioned in the steppes of Moab east of Jordan to enter the land of Canaan,
1:1-5 (2:24-3:29).
2. For the benefit of the new generation of Israelites who would dispossess theinhabitants of Canaan and occupy the land, Moses recounted the history ofGods dealings with their rebellious forefathers:
a. Departing Horeb, the nation chose tribal leaders and made their wayinto the Negev passing through the terrifying wilderness en route to
Kadesh-Barnea where they were positioned to take possession of the
hill country of the Amorites and Canaan, 1:6-21.
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
11/29
b. The people demanded of Moses spies to explore the land; who,confirming the goodness of the land, caused the hearts of their brothers
to melt with reports of the enemies superiority and Gods intention
inferior power to provide protection, 1:22-29.
c. Moses admonished the people not to fear, but to trust God on the basisof his prior acts of provision and deliverance in the wilderness to fight
for them, 1:30-31.
d. Moses pleas went unheeded and the people failed to put their trust inGod (their sin was not accepting the words of Moses, but rejecting the
character of God revealed in his multiple interventions on their
behalf), 1:32-33.
e. God intervened yet again, but this time with righteous anger andjudgment, depriving the men of that generation the privilege ofentering the land, including Moses (3:23-29; 4:21; 32:51; 34:4; see
also Num 20:12; 27:13-14; Ps 106:32) with the exception of Joshua
and Caleb, 1:34-40 (see also, Num 14:6-7, 24-30).
f. Continuing in their rebellion, the evil generation of Israelites directedby God to turn back into the wilderness, instead forged ahead in their
own strength to take the land and were summarily defeated by the
Amorites without the Lords help, 1:41-46.
g. Moses now recounts the 40-year period of wilderness wandering in thevicinity of the range of Mount Seir in Edom below the Dead Sea into
Moab until the last man of the former generation perished, 2:1-23.
h. The new generation of Israelites is directed by God through Moses toadvance beyond Moab through the Arnon River valley of Ammon to
defeat and dispossess the Amorites and the inhabitants of Bashan east
of the Jordan, 2:24-3:22.
i. Moses makes repeated appeals for God to recant his earlier denial ofentrance into the land, but to no avail; Joshua is chosen by God to take
Moses place as leader of the new generation, 3:23-29; see also 31:1-8; Num 27:12-23; Jos 1:1-9.
j. The new generation is admonished prior to entering the land withregard to the law; it is to be treasured as the revealed and objective
standard of Gods requirements for righteous living, 4:1-8.
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
12/29
11
2012
Dr. Douglas A. Blanc, Sr.
k. The people are further admonished to diligently maintain the integrityof their soul against forgetting what they have personally experienced
of Gods intervening favor and judgment and to make them and the
precepts of the law known in perpetuity to their offspring (to trust God
as the basis for rest; to rebel as the basis for unrest); these lessons
passed down were central to the nations perpetuity in the land, 4:9-14.
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
13/29
l. A further area of self-reflection involves the temptation to worshipidols; a temptation that would plague Israel in the land and ultimately
result in their expulsion from the land, 4:15-31.
m. Moses relates to Israel their supreme favor as a privileged people inthe eyes of God as further motivation to keep his statutes (cities ofrefuge are parenthetically mentioned as well), 4:32-43.
n. Moses recounts the moral law (other civil and ceremonial aspectsapply as well) to the people prior to their entrance into the land as the
basis for inhabiting the land and attaining rest, 4:44-5:33.
o. The greatest command (to love God with all ones heart) isemphasized by Moses (also Jesus, see John 13:34-35 and Paul, see 1
Cor 13:1-13) with admonitions not to forget Gods redemption
(Exodus) and protection/provision (Red Sea/wilderness), and to trusthim to dispossess the inhabitants of the land before them; the religion
of the Israelites is fundamentally heart-based, 6:1-8:20.
p. God further admonishes the people through Moses, that when theysucceed in taking the land, not to credit themselves with dispossessing
its inhabitants, 9:1-5.
q. God also reminds the people of the reason he is giving them the land tooccupy; it is not due to their righteousness that they have earned the
land as a possession, but in spite of the unrighteousness and according
to Gods great mercy, 9:6-29.
r. Finally, Moses recounted to the people the news tablets of stonecontaining the moral law which were given following the golden calf
defection (9:13-29) of their forefathers (see Exod 32:1-35); to adhere
to the precepts by circumcising their hearts to honor him first in all
things, 10:1-11:32.
So much of Israelspotential life with God in the land parallels the believers experience of
sanctification. We have likewise been privileged with favor by God through his redemption in
Christ. Beyond this, we no longer have the law to conform to as an objective reference, but thelaw of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus (Rom 8:1-4). It is this dynamic principle of the new birth
which allow Christ to be formed in us (Gal 4:19). Sanctification is both a one-time separation to
God as his purchased possessions and an ongoing process of yielding daily to the righteous
influences of his abiding Holy Spirit (Rom 8:12-17) through his intuitive witness in concert with
the revealed will of God in the scriptures (1 Thess 4:3; Heb 10:10, 14).
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
14/29
13
2012
Dr. Douglas A. Blanc, Sr.
d) Successive stages of conquest:This is a time of transition for the people of God (the nation of Israel) as they move from being
nomadic desert wanderers and become a constituted nation in their own land. This is not only a
transition of geographic location; it is also a transition of human authority and guidance. The
people of God had previously relied on Moses to lead them in accordance with the guidance hereceived from God. Now the Israelites must look to Joshua as the one selected by God to succeed
Moses.
While Moses had initiated the conquest and the allocation of Israels sovereign territory east of
the Jordan (the tribes of Reuben, Gad and half of Manasseh, Deut 3:12-13) defeating the
Amorite king Sihon and Og the king of Bashan (Deut 2:24-3:29), Joshua would continue the
conquest and allocation of tribal land west of the Jordan in Canaan (Jos 1:1-Judg 1:1-36).
Transitions are not easy, especially when a people are accustomed to the status quo. It took the
death of Moses to begin the process of gaining confidence in their new leader (Jos 1:1).
Joshua no doubt experienced his own set of insecurities facing his new role as leader of a
systemically rebellious people. His mission required a skill set as a military leader for which he
possessed neither formal training nor standing army. Like Moses before him, Joshua must rely
fully on God and trust him implicitly through every stage of the conquest. This was no easy task
as many of the directives issued by God would defy logic and common sense reasoning (e.g. the
fall of Jericho, Jos 6:1-27). Both Joshua and the people he would lead must be prepared for the
mission that lay before them (Jos 1:1-5:15). We will visit this subject in a moment, but first we
consider how these historical events spiritually parallel the Christian life.
The believers experience of sanctification noted above is vividly demonstrated in the militaryconquests of Israel. It is important to note that Israel did not merely take possession of vacant
territory, nor did they occupy land which was surrendered to them willingly and with struggle.
Israel must dispossess the current occupants of the land in order to take possession of the
territory which would provide boundaries for their new sovereign state. Lets emphasize the
concept of boundaries for a moment. The boundaries represent the extent of the conquest and the
territory for which the new nation would be accountable to God for maintaining compliance with
his imposed law-based system of civil and moral order.
The conquest was divinely-ordained to be accomplished thoroughly and in stages (see Exod
20:30; the east and central campaign, Jos 6:1-21; 8:1-29; and 10:1-28); the southern campaign,Jos 10:29-43; the northern campaign, Jos 11:1-23). There is a relation between the conquest of
the land and the quality of life enjoyed by the nation in the land (i.e. rest, Heb 4:9). Israel would
enjoy the blessing of God in correspondence with the extent to which they purged the land of its
prior occupants.
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
15/29
With the notable exception of the Gibeonites (Jos 9:1-27), Joshua had fully obeyed God by
devoting all the inhabitants and their possessions to destruction (Jos 6:21; 8:26; 10:28; 11:20).
Prior to his death, the Lord commanded him to purge the remaining unconquered lands of the
Canaanite occupants (Jos 13:1-7). This task seems to have largely been left to the tribes after his
death who failed in their efforts and disobeyed the Lords command to dedicate both occupants
and possessions to destruction (Judg 1:1-36; see Judg 1:19, 25 and 27-36).
The purging of the land of its inhabitants may appear at first glance to be an indefensible and
unjust extermination authorized by God.1 The seven tribes occupying the land were subject to the
ban (Heb. cherem) commanded by God. In other words, the Israelites were to devote to
complete destruction the inhabitants of the land without mercy or covenant (Deut 7:1-2; Jos
6:17-21; 7:11-12). Leaving a remnant of the occupants would subject the new nation to
temptation to sin (e.g. intermarriage and spiritual defection, Deut 7:3-4) and expose them to
divine judgment, Deut 7:4.
Included in the ban was the complete destruction of the altars and carved images used for
pagan worship, Deut 7:5. Justification for the ban was not Israeli favoritism, but to execute
final judgment on the Canaanites. Gods longsuffering toward the Canaanite people endured four
hundred years (Gen 15:16). Israel is his instrument of judgment, just as future generations of
Israelites would be judged by the surrounding nations (Deut 9:4-5; see also Judg 2:11-15).
The experience and process of sanctification follows suit. The Christian life is governed by
deferred authority. That is, we defer authority to the one who purchased us with his own blood
(Acts 20:28; Eph 1:7; 1 Pet 1:18-19). It is by complying with his law, the law of the Spirit of
life (Rom 8:2), that we experience true freedom. Therefore, joy, peace, and contentment are
experienced in relation to an intimate walk with God through complying with the Spirit whose
intuitive and scriptural witness guides us into the character of Christ.
Sanctification has a completed and permanent sense, but it also has an ongoing and progressive
sense (compare Heb 10:10 and Heb 10:14). We have entered the land, so-to-speak, but the
conquest of sin is realized in stages through persistant resolve and ongoing warfare (Jas 1:13-
15). Once realized, there is an ongoing battle to root out every sin which militates against the law
of the Spirit and refuses conformity to Christ (1 Cor 9:24-27; 2 Cor 10:3-6). No sin is to be
tolerated or excused by the Christian (1 Thess 4:1-8; Matt 5:20, 48; 1 John 2:1). As the
Israelites who failed to drive out the inhabitants of the land and exposed themselves to
temptation and ruin, so failing to purge our lives of sin exposes us to temptation and divine
discipline (see Heb 12:4-14).
1See Gary DeLashmutts excellent article on the ban at http://www.xenos.org/essays/ban.
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
16/29
15
2012
Dr. Douglas A. Blanc, Sr.
Lets return to the previously identified preparation of Joshua and the people of God. Before
them was the awesome task of dispossessing the firmly entrenched and militarily fortified
occupants of the land (e.g. the fortified city of Jericho, Jos 6:1).2 What preparation did they need
to guarantee success? There would be many terrifying sights in Canaan to disable the nations
confidence in their new leader and in God to whom he answered. The nation and their leader
needed to have their confidence in Joshua and in God confirmed (Jos 1:1-9; 3:7-13). There is a
similar pattern in the relation between the risen Christ and the disciples who would enter the
harvest at his bidding (Acts 1:1-3). We must also have resolute confidence in God based on the
unshakable truth of his Word and the unfailing nature of his character. God had already allocated
to Israel the land they failed to take from the Canaanites (Jos 13:6; 23:4). There is a fullness
intended for the Christian, a rest for the people of God that is forfeited when we permit sin to
occupy our land. So much is allocated to us by God that is also forfeited for lack of resolve to
wage war against sin.
e) Life in the land:The Old Testament book of Judges perhaps best illustrates the recurring struggle with sin faced
by every believer. The well-known cycle of sin is the predominant theme of the book and
contains the familiar pattern illustrated by the chart below. The period of the judges spans a near
400 year period of Israels history from
the death of Joshua to the death of Samuel
(13801050 BC). Israel is a theocracy, a
nation existing for God and governed by
God. There is a negative connotation to
the appearance of the judges. Judges
appear on the scene in response to the
anguish of the people of God who are
suffering the consequences for their sinful
rebellion. The exploits of several notable
judges are contained in chapters 3-16 of
the book (see table below). The
successive oppressions of the people of
God are accomplished by foreign nations.
The familiar refrain, And the people of
Israel did what was evil in the sight of theLORD (Judg 2:11; 3:7, 12; 4:1; 6:1; 10:6; 13:1).
2German archaeologist Garstang describes Jericho as a four-five acre city surrounded by a double wall (John
Garstang and J.B.E. Garstang, The Story of Jericho, 1940). The double wall of Jericho has a stone retaining wall
base with an earthen rampart separating the two six-feet thick mudbrick walls. The upper wall extended 46 feet
above the ground level. The embankment between the walls also accommodated living quarters. Ernst Sellin and
Carl Watzinger,Jericho die Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen, Osnabrck, Otto Zeller Verlag, 1913.
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
17/29
Apostasy Slavery Years Deliverer Years
Judg 3:5-8 Mesopotamians 8 Othniel (3:9-11) 40
Judg 3:12-14 Moabites 18 EhudShamgar (3:15-31) 80
Judg 4:1-3 Canaanites 20 Deborah & Barak (4:4-5:31) 40
Judg 6:1-10 Midianites 7
Gideon (6:11-8:35) 40
Abimelech (9:1-57) 3
Tola (10:2) 23
Jair (10:3-4) 22
Judg 10:16-18Ammonites Philistines
18
Jephthah (11:1-12:7) 6
Ibzan (12:8-10) 7
Elon (12:11-12) 10
Abdon (12:13-15) 8
Judg 13:1 Philistines 40 Samson (13:2-16:31) 20
It is necessary to preface the period of the judges with the explanation for their appearance
detailed in Judg 2:1-3:6. This accounting of the nations sinful behavior is significant for a fewreasons.
1. After the death of Joshua the nation failed to wage war with the enemy afterthe manner intended by God as revealed to both Moses and to Joshua (see
Exod 23:20-33; Deut 31:1-8; Jos 1:1-9). It is interesting to note that the
biblical record describes the wholesale failure of Israel to drive out the nations
in terms of disobedience and not inability (i.e. did not and not could not,
Judg 1:27-36). The scripture recorded in Judg 2:10 is an ominous reminder
of how repeatedly compromising the Word of God results in wholesale
apostasy.
2. This was rebellion against Gods intended purpose of disposing the occupantsof the land and left the remnant to serve as thorns in the side of his people
(Judg 2:2-3).
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
18/29
17
2012
Dr. Douglas A. Blanc, Sr.
3. It is truly amazing that the generation who entered the Promised Land byvirtue of their forefathers disobedience was not falling prey to the same
spiritual defection. Please realize that fidelity toward God is not automatically
transferrable from generation to generation. Each generation must be
awakened to the just demands of a holy God (2 Chron 7:14; Ezek 18:30-32).
According to Judg 2:7, the leadership of Joshua impacted the people of God
and the elders who outlived him. Yet, without a clear vision from God, the
people would not cast off their restraints (Ps 11:3; Prov 29:18; Judg 17:6;
21:25).
4. Their sinful failure to drive out the nations was eclipsed by their deliberateabandoning of God to follow other gods (Judg 2:11-15). This repeated
offense over the course of three centuries resulted in the experienced
resistance of God toward their every effort to live in the land. How tragic!
God intended rest and not resistance (Judg 2:16-20). Ironically, the pagan
people co-habiting with Israel became instrumental in teaching the wayward
people of God the way to properly wage war (Judg 2:21-3:1-6).
5. Other observation beyond the limits ofJudg 2:1-3:6 concern the Holy Spirit,angelic visitations, the role of prophets, the performance of miracles and the
use of dreams.
The Holy Spirit serves as a present and active instrumental forceempowering insufficient men (e.g. Othniel, Gideon and Samson) to
accomplish impossible acts of deliverance (see Judg 3:10; 6:34;
13:25; 14:19; 15:14 see also 9:23 for a contrary evil spirit). It isinteresting that though previously the feats of Samsons strength are
attributed to the Spirit of God, in his grasping of the two middle pillars
of the temple of Dagon there is no mention of the Spirit rushing upon
him (Judg 16:28-30). Certainly, this feat was not accomplished by
Samsons brute power, but the lack of the Spirits mention is perhaps
to emphasize the grace of God over mere special empowerment.
Samsons great strength was not due to his unshaven head, though
strictly adhering to his Nazirite vows was obligatory for divine
blessing (Judg 13:4-5, 7, 14; see the provisions in Num 6:1-12; there
was only one stated provision for shaving the head and this was in the
case of an unavoidable encounter with a dead body in which case
offerings were required to finish the remainder of the days consecrated
to the Lord). Samsons power resided in his loyalty to Gods anointed
on his life, not in either the loss or regrowth of his hair ( Judg 16:22;
His hair regrew, but his power did not correspondingly return).
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
19/29
The Angel of the LORD figures prominently during the time of thejudges (e.g. appearance to Gideon, Judg 6:11; appearance to Manoah
and also to his wife, Judg 13:3; 8-22). These are theophanic (God
appearing in human form) manifestations of God (Judg 6:14, 22). It
was not immediately apparent to Gideon, Manoah or his wife that they
were in the presence of God (see also of Jesus on the road to Emmaus,
Luke 24:15-16; the mention of Luke that their eyes were restrained
from knowing him is likely an indication of lack of belief; i.e. they did
not see what they did not expect to see). This demonstrates Gods
gracious act of condescending to our need and ultimately typifies
(though many believe these Angel of the LORD appearance in the Old
Testament are pre-incarnate visitation of the Son of God [i.e.
Christophany) the incarnation of the Son of God in the person of Jesus
of Nazareth (Isa 9:6; John 1:11-13).
Prophets and the prophetic function are also identified with the periodof the judges. In such cases the prophetic function is not to disclose the
future as much as it is to deliver a word of warning from God ( Judg
6:7-10 and Judg 9:7-20). When the people of God wander, it is
expected that a holy God will call them to account. Prophets were used
in ancient Israel to deliver messages of judgment to recall to the people
their sin and ultimately to restore them to a favorable position with
God.
The miraculous was also a feature of the period of the judges. In thecase of Gideon, he observed fire from the staff of the Angel of the
LORD which consumed meat and unleavened cakes (Judg 6:21). In the
case of Manoah, his barren wife conceived (Judg 13:3). In the case of
Samson, water erupted as a fountain from a depression in the lands
surface at Lehi (Judg 15:19). These miraculous acts of God were
intended to confirm the faith of the witnesses (see of Jesus, Acts 1:3).
The mention of Gods use of dreams is significant to describing hismulti-faceted function during the period of the judges (Judg 7:13-15).
It is interesting to note that Midianites and not the people of God
received both the dream and also the interpretation of the dream. If
God can use an inanimate bush, he can use pagan Midianites (see
Exod 3:2). Moreover, the dream incidence was intended to strengthen
the faith of Gideon (see Judg 7:9-11, 15).
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
20/29
19
2012
Dr. Douglas A. Blanc, Sr.
Additional observations of the documented period of the judges include what may be called the
folly of Gideon (Judg 8:27). As profound as his use to God had been and as demonstrative of
courageous obedience to God had been displayed, Gideon failed miserably by making an ephod.
An ephod is generally understood as the vestment worn by the high priest in ancient Israel (see
Exod 28:6-14), but in the case of Gideon it likely is a reference to an image reminiscent of the
golden calf; at least it was worshipped as such (see Exod 32:2-4; Judg 8:24-27).
The venerated image became a snare (a trap) to Gideon (see the use of the term in Exod
23:33 and Deut 7:16). This compromising act of Gideon may have been the cause for his sons
rebellion again Gideon and ultimately against God. His arrogance and brutality is epic (see Judg
9:1-6). This recalls the future act of David (his arrogance and brutality) and the resulting
defection of his son Absalom (2 Sam 11:1-18:33). These indiscretions identify the erosion of
spiritual well-being, the failure to deal with temptation, and the eventual moral failure of the
child of God who reserves unto himself or herself some facet of their life. As priests of God, we
are to be wholly devoted to the Lord (see Exod 28:36; 1 Pet 2:5, 9).
The climax of effrontery for Abimelech was his demand to be made king by the people (Judg
9:6). His father Gideon had rightly refused this role in Israel as it was intended to be occupied by
God alone (Judg 8:23). It is recorded of Abimelechs demise that God judged him for his evil
deeds (Judg 9:56-57). Like Achan before him, swift and irreversible judgment was meted out by
God. As in the case of Ananias and Sapphira (Acts 5:1-11), God brought swift and irreversible
judgment upon member of the early church. We may wonder why at times God is longsuffering
and patient with his rebellious children and at other time swift in bringing judgment. The answer
is likely found in his desire to make his holiness known (see Num 20:12; Isa 8:13). Often public
offences are dealt with publically that God may expose the sin and instill his reverential fear in
the hearts of his people (e.g. Heb 10:30-31).
It is useful at this point to identify the common attributes of the primary judges featured in the
record of this period.
1. All were subject to fear, doubt, anxiety, temptation, and pride among the full-range of human imperfections. None were anointed (chosen) by God due to
their superior qualifications (see of Elijah, Jas 5:17).
2. The success of the judges in the performance of their acts of deliverance isattributed to their being a willing and compliant vessel in the hands of God.
3. The Spirit of God is the agent occasioning deliverance through the willinghuman instrument (e.g. Judg 3:10). This is most explicitly referenced in the
case of Samson (Judg 13:25; 14:6, 19: 15:14; see also, 1 Sam 11:6).
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
21/29
4. Profound experiences of the Spirit and remarkable use by God does noteliminate vigilance over the human heart. Gideons sinful casting of the ephod
and Samsons callous neglect of his Nazirite vow illustrate human
susceptibility to temptation. We must not place confidence is what God is able
to do with us. A tool in the hand of a craftsman receives no glory. Our duty is
to remain vigilant both within and without. That is, internally we must keep
watch over our hearts (Prov 3:23) and externally we must remain aware of
Satans lurking presence (1 Pet 5:8). Davids lament of Saul includes the
repeated epitaph, How the mighty have fallen (2 Sam 1:25-27).
f) Expulsion from the land:A brief review is in order at this point in our journey. The land of Canaan was promised to
Abraham and to his descendants by God as a perpetual possession (Gen 17:8; 26:2-5; 28:1-4,
13-14; 1 Chron 16:16-18; Ps 105:8-11). The promise extended beyond the mere possession of
land. The land was to be a place where the people of God could dwell under his abiding care,serve and worship him in accordance with his revealed statutes and thus experience his manifold
blessings (Deut 29:12-14).
Even before the exact location of the land was revealed to Abram, God discussed its provision in
terms of a tri-fold blessing (see Gen 12:1-3). We later see that the experienced blessing of God is
based upon the faithfulness of the beneficiary (see Gen 26:4-5). We can recall the first Israelites
taking possession of the land under Joshua. Moses had previously commanded them that upon
entering the land they were to divide the tribes and stand respectively on Mount Gerizim (for the
blessing) and on Mount Ebal (for the curse), Deut 27:11-14. The Levites were to proclaim the
curses and the people were to answer with Amen (so be it), Deut 27:15-26. Mosesproceeded to recount the blessings and the curses to the people (Deut 28:1-68). The blessings of
God accrue to those who are whole-heartedly devoted to him (Deut 30:9-10).
So, there is a distinction to be made in order to understand why the people of God were expelled
from land given by God to them in perpetuity. In addition to the promise-covenant of God with
Abram, there is also what may be termed a land covenant revealed by Moses to the people
(Deut 28:1-30:20). The former (unconditional-Abrahamic) covenant provided the people of God
with perpetual title to the land. The latter covenant (Deut 29:1-conditional) detailed the
provisions for their remaining in the land; provisions which may be summed up in one word,
obedience (Deut 28:2, 9, 13-15, 45-47, 58; 29:9). Thus, the land covenant was inseparablylinked to the Sinaitic (Mosaic) covenant (see Exod 19:5-6); the civil, ceremonial and moral
requirements for life in a theocratic kingdom. The Jews have not always inhabited the land given
to them by God, but they will always hold title to its possession. This must be understood,
because in expelling his people from their land, God did not break his covenant with them. They
had failed to uphold the provisions given to them by God for living under his blessing in the
land.
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
22/29
21
2012
Dr. Douglas A. Blanc, Sr.
The expulsion of the people of God from the land was not an immediate occurrence. The steady
sin-induced spiritual erosion placed the people in a continual state of rebellion against God.
Though neither Saul nor David was perfect in the eyes of the Lord, the reign of Solomon is the
tipping point of spiritual apostasy in the life of the newly established kingdom (see 1 Kgs 11:1-
43). Two kingdoms would result from Gods judgment on Solomon, tearing the kingdom from
his lineage and giving it to Jeroboam (1 Kgs 11:11-13, 26-43). Jeroboam sealed the fate of Israel
by rebelling against God (1 Kgs 12:25-33). Successive kings continued the practice of spiritual
apostasy (e.g. 1 Kgs 15:34; 16:30). More than this, they had broken the land covenant relation
established by God as the terms for their continued possession of the land. God was bound by the
terms of the land covenant to expel his people from the very land he promised to them as a
lasting inheritance. The blessings of life in the land were conditioned on the hearts of the nation-
inhabitants toward God (see Lev 18:24-30; 20:22-25; Deut 29:18-20 and Judg 2:16-3:6).
Therefore, the Israelites had determined their own course (Deut 29:25-26; see also, Deut 30:11-
20). To depart from God was to break his land covenant and to effectively seal their fate. The
grace and longsuffering of God are on display here. Suffering egregious displays of spiritual
apostasy from the people; God raised up Judges to liberate them from the consequences of
rebellion. He sent prophets to tell-forth his previously revealed ways, to call the nation into
conformity with his covenant and to permit their continued residence in the land (e.g. 1 Kgs
11:29-39; 13:1-10; 16:1-7; 17:1-19:18; 19:19-21; 21:17-24; 2 Kgs 1:1-2:14; 2:15-9:13; 13:14-
21; 19:1-7) . Though their eventual expulsion from the land is predicted before theirpossession
of the land, God revealed through Moses their return to the land in accordance with his
compassion and willingness to forgive (Deut 30:1-10). God desires his people to be recipients
of his blessings. The prophets delivered his words of appeal much as the Word of God is
impressed upon us by the Spirit of God and is intended to awaken us from spiritual slumber andembolden us to flee the path of sin and to escape the severity of Gods lovingly-applied hand of
discipline.
Willful and sinful rebellion resulted in the unheeded voice of God through the prophets and the
expulsion-deportation of the Northern Kingdom from the land by the Assyrian Empire in 722 BC
(worse than their expulsion was the corresponding Assyrian occupation; this contributed to the
comingling of races and the advent of the Samaritan people; i.e., not every Israelite in the
Northern Kingdom was deported). The Southern Kingdom faced three waves of Babylonian
invasion ending finally in the destruction of the Jerusalem temple in 586 BC. The remaining
people of God in the south (the allotment given by God to Solomons progeny, 1 Kgs 11:13)were carried away to Babylon as exiles to endure 70 years of captivity (failure to provide a
Sabbath rest for the land during their time of occupancy?).
This sequence of events regarding the spiritual apostasy of the Israelites is reminiscent of the
Parable of the Minas taught by Jesus and recorded in Luke 19:11-27. In the case of the people
of God, each was required a stewardship to be blessed in the land. In the same manner, we as
Christians are stewards of our lives in the kingdom and are blessed accordingly (1 Cor 4:2). The
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
23/29
parable is told due to the presumption of the immediate arrival of the kingdom of God by the
people (v. 11; see also, John 6:15; Mark 10:35-45; Acts 1:6). Since the arrival of the kingdom
of God would be delayed, the parable teaches stewardship regarding the stipulations for
occupancy of this world until it is delivered (v. 12). The giving of a mina to each of ten servants
is indicative of the stewardship required (to engage in business until I come, v. 13 ESV).
A mina is equal to 100 drachmas which is equivalent to a days wage. Instead of rejoicing over
the imminent return of their master and the ensuing kingdom it would bring; the occupants of the
land hated him (v. 14; see also of the rejection of Jesus, Ps 118:22-23; Matt 21:42; 1 Pet 2:6-8).
In vv. 15-27 we are told of the day of accounting for the servants. Those who were faithful
stewards were blessed in the kingdom (vv. 15-18). The unfaithful servant was stripped of his
stewardship (vv. 19-26).
The lesson for the disciples of Jesus is that those who are faithful in the duty of proclaiming the
gospel will be enriched and will continue to touch the lives of others, while those neglecting this
enterprise will live spiritually unfulfilled lives (v. 26). The enemies identified in v. 14 are those
with no affinity to the master. They await not only loss of the kingdom, but eternal damnation (v.
27). From this we may conclude that disciples of Christ may live spiritually fulfilled or
unfulfilled lives in the kingdom. To be spiritually fulfilled is to be actively engaged in touching
lives with the gospel of Jesus Christ. There is no numerical standard for the achievement of this
stewardship (e.g. one life or a thousand lives). Occupying the kingdom-land is a matter of living
under the terms established by the King (Matt 28:18-20; Mark 16:15; Acts 1:8). Those of Israel
who were expelled from the land form two companies; those who hated the King and would
never return (the Northern Kingdom) and those who would later repent in exile and return (the
Southern Kingdom).
g) Life outside the land (for the south):We turn now to the sad estate of the people of God living in exile outside the land of promise.
They have exchanged the tranquility of resting in the presence and provision of God for bitter
sorrow and constant lament (Ps 137:1-9). This is far more than a matter of geographic
dislocation. This is a matter of spiritual isolation. God will give his people of taste of life on
their own in a remote place (see 1 Cor 5:5 and 1 Tim 1:20 [Job 2:6; Acts 26:18]). They will
exchange the dominion of God for life as oppressed people in a foreign land (see Jer 25:8-14;
29:10; 2 Chron 36:17-21). While the Northern Kingdom of Israel experienced wholesale
defection from God, the Southern Kingdom of Judah experienced cycles of spiritual defection
and reformation. Perhaps this is why God chose to spare them becoming a footnote on the pages
of history. More likely, God determined to remain faithful to the covenant he made with Abram
(Gen 12:1-3) and to hold his people to the land-use arrangement for life in the land ( Deut 28:1-
30:20), even at the cost of a lesson aimed at restoring their hearts to a state of undivided loyalty
(Deut 6:5). Thus restored, the people would fail God again (e.g. the role of the post-exilic
prophets), but never to the point of idolatry and apostasy. The heavy hand of divine discipline
once-and-for-all had removed the taste of spiritual defection from the palate of Judaism.
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
24/29
23
2012
Dr. Douglas A. Blanc, Sr.
We must be brought to a place where our thirst for spiritual satisfaction (as the foundation for
what we believe and what we do) can only be quenched in God. Consider the 42nd Psalm. The
Psalmist finds himself against his will removed at a distance from the temple (the place of divine
manifestation and presence). Perhaps the context is Davids exile from Jerusalem during the days
of Absaloms intrigue (2 Sam 15:1-37; [Ps 55:1-23] a truly sad account of Davids emotional
upheaval at the prospect of being separated from his beloved city and the house of God, yet
hopeful of his return if the Lord once again blessed him with favor, v. 25). He is surrounded by
ungodly people who mock him as forsaken by God, v. 3. He comforts himself at the prospect of
Gods soon deliverance, v. 5. God desired to recover the heart of David, but this required the
heavy hand of discipline. A renewed passion for God (the holiness of God) was born from a path
no saint would freely choose (see Ps 51:1-19). As objects of Gods love (Prov 3:11-12; Heb
12:5-6; Ps 94:12; 119:67, 75; Rev 3:19), we must at times be taken down paths we would not
choose to realize benefits we otherwise would never possess. So it is with the remnant of his
people, Israel.
The history of Israel/Judah teaches us to cherish the privilege of knowing the will of God and
living under its gracious provisions. For the believer, the will of God consists not in some
definitive and concrete detail, but in living under his rule in his kingdom and by the tenets of life
in the kingdom (see the lengthy description of kingdom life by Jesus in his Sermon on the Mount
in Matt 5:1-7:29; and the concise statement by Paul in 1 Thess 4:3).
In our analysis of Judahs deferred blessings and privileges of God under his rule, a few
important features standout for consideration.
1. It must be remembered that the remnant of Israel (Judah) existed on a tiny space of landbetween powerful world empires (Egypt to the southwest, Assyria to the north andBabylon to the northeast). The influence of the presence of such world powers
encroaching on the tiny nations sovereign borders cannot be understated. From this we
may learn that the call to live a life wholly devoted to God and trusting in him at all times
is not performed in a vacuum of idyllic circumstances, but in the crucible of enemy
presence and opposition (e.g. Eph 6:10-18; 1 Pet 4:8-9). There is truth to the adage that
if one would do the impossible, he/she must learn to live by the invisible (see 2 Kgs
6:17 and 7:6). The pressure was immense to trust in a foreign alliance and form a
coalition against a rival power. Hezekiah was warned by the prophet Isaiah not to trust in
Egypt against the threats of Assyria (Isa 20:1-6; 30:1-2; 31:1-9). At the same time
Assyria provoked the people of God with threats (Isa 36:1-22). God honored Hezekiahs
faith (2 Chron 32:26; Jer 26:18-19) and though the crucible was severe (paying an
exorbitant tribute [2 Kgs 18:15-16], and facing terminal illness [2 Kgs 20:1-6], and
though foolishly showing the Babylonian envoy his personal wealth [2 Kgs 20:12-19],
God healed him and routed 185,000 Assyrian troops in a single night (2 Kgs 19:35-36).
Temptation comes with the force of Assyrian emissaries or the deceit of Babylonian
envoys; perhaps even the prospect of Egyptian support? We can rationalize our sinful
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
25/29
coalitions due to the extremity of the hour. So tiny are we against the overwhelming
forces of our oppressive circumstances. We are like the foolish servant above (Luke
19:20) who placed his mina in a handkerchief, refusing to trust the kings intentions out
of fear.
2. The remnant of Judah experienced occasions of renewal from which they derived onlytemporary benefit. Rehoboam (Solomons son and successor) followed the Lord for three
years (2 Chron 11:13-17) before plunging Judah into idolatry and immorality (2 Kgs
14:21-24). The once-friendly Egyptian regime invaded and plundered the wealth of Judah
(2 Kgs 14:25-28). Reformation occurred under Asa (911-870 BC), 1 Kgs 15:11-13.
Again the nation spiritually defected under successive kings (e.g. Jehoram, 848-41 BC,
who murdered his brothers and nobles who posed a threat to him, setting up shrines to
Baal and restoring the high places, see 2 Kgs 8:16-19; especially note v. 19).
Reformation cam again through Joash (835-796 BC) during the period of his life when he
was influenced by the godly high priest Jehoida, but killed his successor and turned to
foreign gods following his death, see 2 Chron 24:1-27. More failure by a succession of
kings ensued until another reformation during the reign Hezekiah (715-686 BC), who
destroyed the false gods and repaired the temple of the Lord, see 2 Chron 29:1-31:21.
Hezekiahs reforms were undone by his son Manassehs 55-year reign (686-642 BC).
Manasseh returned Judah to all the wicked practices for which the Lord drove out the
previous inhabitants of the land (2 Kgs 21:1-18). His repentance came via the Assyrian
invasion that carried the wicked king away (2 Chron 33:12). Though he was restored by
God and took away the detestable things from the land (2 Chron 33:14-20), his son
Amon (642-20 BC) did not follow his fathers later humbled state (2 Chron 33:21-25).
The final reformation before Judahs descent into captivity came during the reign ofgodly Josiah (640-609 BC). Under Josiah the Book of the Law is discovered when he
purged the land of idols and renovated the temple (2 Chron 34:1-21), issuing in
repentance and an unprecedented celebration of the Passover (2 Chron 35:16-19).
Such is the nature of revival to our soul. It comes as a fresh breath of the Spirit of God over the
spiritually neglected parched and arid regions of the land for which we are accountable to God
for its proper use under his rule. Thus, we must make the best use of the crucible of divine
discipline so as to make revival more enduring and less occurring. Areas of personal vigilance
are among the following:
1. Make your time in the Word of God meaningful; less academic and mechanical and moreSpirit-dependent, reflective and aimed at strengthening faith-eroding weaknesses (Ps
119:11).
2. Make your time in prayer more praise-oriented and less petition-centered. Consider theordering of the so-calledLords Prayer(Matt 6:9-13) where adoration precedes requests.
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
26/29
25
2012
Dr. Douglas A. Blanc, Sr.
3. Determine to serve and not to be served, following the Lords example in Mark 10:45.h) Return to the land:
In our present study, we have traversed much of the OT narrative. The dealings of God with his
people Israel is a story of promises made and kept by God mingled with opportunities forfeitedand hopes dashed by his people. More than this, we have discovered obedience as the path to
blessing and disobedience as the path to misery. We have discovered a God who acts with
intention. We have discovered a God who desires to favor objects of his love with immeasurable
gifts aimed at optimizing their experience of him with indescribable pleasure. This recalls a
quote from John Piper, God is most glorified in us when we are most satisfied in him. We have
discovered a God, who in the midst of gross rebellion and spiritual apostasy is patient and
longsuffering toward his people. We have discovered a God who disciplines his people to expose
their sin in order to spare them the severe consequences of departure from the path of blessing.
Finally, we have discovered the dealings of God with his people Israel is a microcosm of his
dealings with us, the followers of Jesus Christ. We are reminded of the apostle Pauls descriptionof the usefulness of the OT scriptures in the life of the follower of Jesus (see Rom 15:4). Paul
described the Hebrew Bible (OT) as containing episodes of Gods former dealings with his
people that have a present instructional function for us. Being thus instructed, Paul says that we
gain endurance (i.e. the ability to bear difficult circumstances to learn transformative lessons;
this word also appears in Jas 1:2-4) and find hope through the ever-present assistance of the
scriptures (the word here is similar to that which is used for the role of the Holy Spirit, see John
14:15-17). We must not miss the valuable lessons of the past selected by God and preserved by
God as a witness to future generations. To neglect the OT scriptures is to neglect the testimony
of these witnesses and in doing so to enter into their sin (see Heb 12:1).
We now come to place in the narrative flow of Gods dealings with his people at such a time
when they have endured his heavy hand of disciple in the form of seventy years of captivity/exile
in a foreign land (Babylon). It must be remembered that the Babylonian captivity was severe for
the Jews not because it was foreign and culturally pagan and offensive, but because it removed
them from the trappings of the temple, the ministry of the priesthood, the instruction of the
Torah, the meaningful periodic annual celebrations, and the ritual sacrifices whereby the LORD
God was worshipped. In captivity, God intended to teach his people never again to forsake an
intimate walk with him for the empty promises of pagan images and the benefits afforded to
those who would sellout (e.g. fertility rites associated with pagan deities). When we fail to
desire God more than any thing or any person, he will fill our hearts with the emptiness
which comes from attaining the inordinate objects of our affection (Ps 81:12; 106:15 [37:4];
Rom 1:24). What may appear in the moment to be a life of untold blessing (gaining all that pour
heart longs after), may in reality be a detour down a wrong road which ends in spiritual
emptiness and ruin (Luke 15:11-32). We may attain all the world offers and forfeit that which
matters most; an intimate walk with God (Matt 16:26; 2 Tim 4:10).
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
27/29
In his infinite mercy, God brought back his people to the land of promise. Having learned their
lesson, he restored them to the land intended to be a proving ground for achieving an intimate
relationship with him. This is evident from his demand upon the first of three waves of returning
exiles. God desired his temple to be rebuilt so that his worship could be central to the nations
identity and purpose. First and foremost, the remnant of Israel would be a people of the L ORD
God and their land would serve as a testimony to the nations, better, an invitation to the nations
to come under the sovereign rule of God (many of the so-called Royal or Enthronement Psalms
depict this intention; see Pss 2, 18, 20, 21, 29, 45, 47, 72, 93, 95-99, 101, 110, 144 [Ps 96:1-13;
117:1-2]). Having learned their lesson by not following after false gods, that nation once again
deviated from its obligation to love God and to serve him fully. The temple construction began in
earnest with the laying of the foundation. In doing so, they raised the awareness of their enemies
who were threatened by a resurgent Israel in the region. Attempting to confound their efforts,
their enemies succeeded in bring a halt to the temple reconstruction. This condition, whereby the
people of God feared the people of the land more than him, persisted for approximately 20 years
(rough estimates have the first wave of exiles returning by the decree of the Persian King Cyrusin 536 BC and the temple completion in 516 BC).
During this interim period of defiance against Gods sovereign purpose (i.e. to be the central and
focal point of the nation), God graciously sent prophets to renew and unify the hearts of his
people. Two prophets, Haggai and Zechariah, alternated their inspiring messages to the people of
God during this initial stage of return to the land. We will focus our attention on the initial
message of Haggai (Hag 1:1-15), a message that motivated the people of God to renew their
deferred (20-year lapsed) God-given task of rebuilding the temple.
1. The Role of the Man of GodHaggai, whose name in Hebrew means my feast, is one in whom seemingly the Lord delights.
There is no biographical information to know this with certainty except for his name and the fact
that God chose to use him for this sacred purpose destined for this time (see of Esther in Esth
4:14). The phrase, the word of the LORD came by the hand of Haggai the prophet (1:1 ESV), uses
imagery to depict the role of the prophet as the vehicle through whom his revealed purposes are made known. God
has his appointed agents to communicate his appointed message to his appointed people at his appointed time (see
2 Cor 5:20). That is, Haggai is Gods man delivering Gods message to Gods people in Gods time for Gods
purpose.
2. The Opportune Timing of Gods InterventionThe notion of time being significant is evident from the chronological details in the text. We are
given the precise month, day, and year when Haggai received the word of God to be passed on
(by the hand of) to the returning exiles, v. 1. Note also the reference to time narrated by the
writer in the comments following the oracle of Haggai (v. 15). Other references to time appear in
the book (see 2:1; 2:10 and 2:18). We may learn from this that God acts at moments in time
deemed by him as opportune for his purpose (see Mark 1:15; Gal 4:4).
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
28/29
27
2012
Dr. Douglas A. Blanc, Sr.
In this case, the returned exiles had ceased their efforts to rebuild the temple as commanded by
God. The book of Ezra details God use of a pagan Persian king (Cyrus) through whom to deliver
the order to rebuild the temple, an order that included the provisions of the necessary materials
(1:1-6). A key theme in the Ezra 1:1-6account is Gods stirring hearts (1:1 and 1:5). Note the
mention of this phenomenon occurring once again as a result of the prophetic voice of Haggai
(Hag 1:14). Like a strong wind fanning embers into a roaring flame, so the Spirit of the living
God causes renewed passion for deferred God-given tasks. We may lose our way from time to
time, but God maintains the vision in tack and send his Spirit to thaw frozen spirits and make
pliable again the dried remains of a once useful vessel. The book of Ezra details the initial phase
of this God-inspired resolve (3:1-13). The foundation of the temple was laid with great
celebration, the altar built, offerings made to God, and the celebration of the appointed annual
feasts reinstituted. The people were foolish to assume that such spiritual advances would come
without spiritual opposition. The book of Ezra details both the opposition to the work of God by
the enemies of God and the corresponding compromise by the people of God (Ezra 4:1-5, 24).
Haggai adds to our understanding of the cessation of the work of rebuilding the temple. We may
infer from Ezra that the deferral was fear-driven and become tempted ourselves to empathize.
However, this is not a full accounting of the peoples disobedience. Haggai explains that a self-
serving attitude on the part of the people of God quenched their Spirit-aided passion for God and
his purpose (1:2-4). Rather than rebuilding Gods house the people build paneled houses for
themselves. We see a conflict between my time and your time, between my house and
your houses, and between the word of God and the will of the people.
3. Interpreting the CircumstancesKeeping in mind that some 18 years had passed and that the people had become accustomed totheir spiritually disobedient status (e.g. naively offering sacrifices and keeping feasts on a site
where the temple was to have been rebuilt!), the prophet calls for the people to consider their
ways (1:5-11). The Hebrew meaning behind the command to consider is to set your mind on
past actions that have resulted in present conditions and portend future implications (i.e. if left
unaltered by repentance and renewed obedience). These verses relate a physical condition among
the people in which they were fed/clothed/productive but not satisfied. What they earned was
eaten up by inflation. More than this, these occurrences were not attributed to the volatility of
economic indicators, but to the direct intervention of God who had called for drought upon the
land and its people (v. 11; see 1 Kgs 17:1). Disobedience is a spiritual intoxicant that uses
rationalization to justify negative circumstances. Not every negative circumstance is related to
disobedience, but if we are unfaithful in some point of obedience we can expect God to intersect
out path with an attention-getting crisis. Still, crises do not always awaken the soul-slumbering
saint. Many times God uses an individual who delivers his word at an opportune time in an
opportune place (see 2 Sam 12:7).
-
7/30/2019 Journey to Rest
29/29
4. Beginning AgainHaggai records the details of the peoples recovery from spiritual languish (1:12-15). What had
been a wholesale departure from the purpose of God is now a wholesale renewal to his will ( vv.
8, 12). The sign of renewal was the fear of the people for God. This is not trepidation for God,
but a renewal of the nation to a God-centered identity and purpose. In keeping with renewal isthe nations unequivocal trust in God (v. 13). The result was the stirring of hearts of the people
once again to the worship and service of the Lord (v. 14).
The rest we seek (Heb 4:10) is a matter of spiritual conformity to the purposes of God. It is
experienced in an unreserved quietness about our being that defers every circumstance to his
sovereign control. Every facet of our lives is under the dominion of his perfect rule. We own
nothing. What we possess we have for a time and for purposes not our own. Our lives are lived
in full acquiescence to Christ and for his kingdom (Matt 6:33; 16:24; Gal 2:20; Phil 3:10).