Journal of Dental Hygiene - American Dental...
-
Upload
nguyenminh -
Category
Documents
-
view
236 -
download
4
Transcript of Journal of Dental Hygiene - American Dental...
-
Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall 2011 The Journal of Dental Hygiene 239
Treating Aggressive PeriodontitisOralHealthLiteracyintheDentalOffice:TheUnrecognizedPatientRisk
FactorDentalDiagnostics:MolecularAnalysisofOralBiofilmsDiabetesandOralHealth:TheImportanceofOralHealthRelatedBehaviorUseofComplementaryandAlternativeMedicineforWorkRelatedPain
CorrelatesWithCareerSatisfactionAmongDentalHygienistsCaliforniaDentalHygienistsKnowledge,AttitudesandPracticesRegarding
HerbalandDietarySupplementsComparisonofDentalHygieneClinicalInstructorandStudentOpinionsof
ProfessionalPreparationforClinicalInstructionOralHygieneKnowledgeandPracticeAmongDinkaandNuerfromSudan
totheU.S.AssessmentoftheUniversityofMichigansDentalHygienePartnershipwith
theHuronValleyBoys&GirlsClub:AStudyofStudentsandStaffs PerceptionsandServiceLearningOutcomes
FactorsAffectingthePerformanceofOralCancerScreeningsbyTexas Dental Hygienists
PredictingNationalDentalHygieneBoardExaminationSuccessBasedon SpecificAdmissionFactors
FinancialManagementPracticesandAttitudesofDentalHygienists:A DescriptiveStudy
RepetitiveCoronalPolishingYieldsMinimalEnamelLoss
Journalof
DentalHygiene
The AmericAn DenTAl hygienisTs AssociATion
FAll 2011 Volume 85 number 4
-
240 The Journal of Dental Hygiene Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall 2011
Journal of Dental HygieneVOLUME85NUMBER4FALL2011
CelesteM.Abraham,DDS,MSCynthiaC.Amyot,BSDH,EdDJoannaAsadoorian,AAS,BScD,MScCarenM.Barnes,RDH,BS,MSPhyllisL.Beemsterboer,RDH,MS,EdDStephanieBossenberger,RDH,MSLindaD.Boyd,RDH,RD,LS,EdDKimberlyS.Bray,RDH,MSLorraineBrockmann,RDH,MSPatriciaRegenerCampbell,RDH,MSDanCaplan,DDS,PhDMarieCollins,RDH,EdDBarbaraH.Connolly,PT,EdD,FAPTAValerieJ.Cooke,RDH,MS,EdDMaryAnnCugini,RDH,MHPSusanJ.Daniel,AAS,BS,MSMicheleDarby,BSDH,MSCatherineDavis,RDH,PhD.FIDSAJaniceDeWald,BSDH,DDS,MSSusanDuley,BS,MS,EdS,EdD,LPC,CEDSJacquelynM.Dylla,DPT,PTKathyEklund,RDH,BS,MHPDeborahE.Fleming,RDH,MSJaneL.Forrest,BSDH,MS,EdD
JacquelynL.Fried,RDH,BA,MSMaryGeorge,RDH,BSDH,MEdKathyGeurink,RDH,BS,MAJoanGluch,RDH,PhDMariaPernoGoldie,RDH,BA,MSEllenGrimes,RDH,MA,MPA,EdDJoAnnR.Gurenlian,RDH,PhDLindaL.Hanlon,RDH,BS,MEd,PhDKittyHarkleroad,RDH,MSLisaF.HarperMallonee,BSDH,MPH,RD/LDHaroldA.Henson,RDH,MEdLauraJansenHowerton,RDH,MSOlgaA.C.Ibsen,RDH,MSMaryJacks,MS,RDHHeatherL.Jared,RDH,BS,MSWendyKerschbaum,RDH,MA,MPHSalmeLavigne,RDH,BA,MSDHJessicaY.Lee,DDS,MPH,PhDMadeleineLloyd,MS,FNPBC,MHNPBCDeborahLyle,RDH,BS,MSDeborahS.Manne,RDH,RN,MSN,OCNAnnL.McCann,RDH,BS,MS,PhDStacyMcCauley,RDH,MSGayleMcCombs,RDH,MS
TriciaMoore,RDH,BSDH,MA,EdDChristineNathe,RDH,MSKathleenJ.Newell,RDH,MA,PhDJohannaOdrich,RDH,MS,DrPhPamelaOverman,BSDH,MS,EdDVickieOverman,RDH,BS,MEdFotinosS.Panagakos,DMD,PhD,MEdM.ElaineParker,RDH,MS,PhDCeibPhillips,MPH,PhDMarjorieReveal,RDH,MS,MBAPamelaD.Ritzline,PT,EdDJudithSkeleton,RDH,BS,MEd,PhDAnnEshenaurSpolarich,RDH,PhDSherylL.ErnestSyme,RDH,MSTerriTilliss,RDH,BS,MS,MA,PhDLynnTolle,BSDH,MSMargaretWalsh,RDH,MS,MA,EdDDonnaWarrenMorris,RDH,MS,MEdCherylWestphal,RDH,MSKarenB.Williams,RDH,PhDCharlotteJ.Wyche,RDH,MSPamelaZarkowski,BSDH,MPH,JD
EDitorial rEviEw BoarD
The Journal of Dental Hygiene is the refereed, scientificpublicationoftheAmericanDentalHygienistsAssociation.Itpromotesthepublicationoforiginalresearchrelatedtotheprofession,theeducation,andthepracticeofdentalhygiene.The journal supports the development and disseminationof a dental hygiene body of knowledge through scientificinquiryinbasic,applied,andclinicalresearch.
StatEmEnt of PurPoSE
Please submit manuscripts for possible publication in theJournal of Dental [email protected].
SuBmiSSionS
The Journal of Dental Hygieneispublishedquarterlyonlineby the American Dental Hygienists Association, 444 N.Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611. Copyright 2010 bytheAmericanDentalHygienistsAssociation.Reproductioninwhole or partwithoutwritten permission is prohibited.Subscriptionratesfornonmembersareoneyear,$45;twoyears,$65;threeyears,$90;freeformembers.
SuBSCriPtionS
SandraBoucherBessent,RDH,BSJacquelineR.Carpenter,RDHMaryCooper,RDH,MSEdHeidiEmmerling,RDH,PhDMargaretJ.Fehrenbach,RDH,MSCathrynL.Frere,BSDH,MSEd
PatriciaA.Frese,RDH,BS,MEdJoanGibsonHowell,RDH,MSEd,EdDAnneGwozdek,RDH,BA,MACassandraHolderBallard,RDH,MPALynneCarolHunt,RDH,MSShannonMitchell,RDH,MS
KipRowland,RDH,MSLisaK.Shaw,RDH,MSMargaretSix,RDH,BS,MSDHRuthFearingTornwall,RDH,BS,MSSandraTuttle,RDH,BSDHJeanTyner,RDH,BS
BooK rEviEw BoarD
ExECutivE DirECtorAnnBattrell,RDH,BS,[email protected]
DirECtor of [email protected]
EDitor EmErituSMaryAliceGaston,RDH,MS
EDitorinCHiEfRebeccaS.Wilder,RDH,BS,[email protected]
Staff [email protected]
layout/DESignJoshSnyder
PrESiDEntPamelaQuinones,RDH,BS
PrESiDEntElECtSusanSavage,RDH,BSDH
viCE PrESiDEntDeniseBowers,RDH,MSEd
trEaSurErLouannM.Goodnough,RDH,BSDH
immEDiatE PaSt PrESiDEntCarynSolie,RDH
2010 2011 aDHa offiCErS
-
Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall 2011 The Journal of Dental Hygiene 241
insideJournal of Dental HygieneVol.85No.4Fall2011
features
Departments 242 Editorial
Research
244 treating aggressive Periodontitis DeniseM.Bowen,RDH,MS
248 OralHealthLiteracyintheDentalOffice:TheUnrecognizedPatient risk factor JulieH.Schiavo,MLIS,AHIP
256 DentalDiagnostics:MolecularAnalysisofOralBiofilms SarahHiyari,MS;KatieM.Bennett,PhD
264 DiabetesandOralHealth:TheImportanceofOralHealthRelated Behavior PreethaP.Kanjirath,BDS,MDS,MS;SeungEunKim,DDS; MaritaRohrInglehart,Dr.phil.habil.273 use of Complementary and alternative medicine for workrelated Pain Correlates with Career Satisfaction among Dental Hygienists AubreChismark,RDH,MS;GaryAsher,MD,MPH;MargotStein,PhD; TabithaTavoc,RDH,PhD;AliceCurran,DMD,MS285 California Dental Hygienists Knowledge, attitudes and Practices regarding Herbal and Dietary Supplements MichelleHurlbutt,RDH,MSDH;KimberlyBray,RDH,MS; TanyaVillalpandoMitchell,RDH,MS;JoniStephens,EdS,RDH297 Comparison of Dental Hygiene Clinical instructor and Student opinions of Professional Preparation for Clinical instruction MarieR.Paulis,RDH,MSDH306 oral Hygiene Knowledge and Practice among Dinka and nuer from Sudan to the u.S. MaryS.Willis,PhD;RachelM.Bothun,BS316 assessment of the university of michigans Dental Hygiene PartnershipwiththeHuronValleyBoys&GirlsClub:AStudyof Students and Staffs Perceptions and Service learning outcomes SarahChristensenBrydges,RDH,BSDH;AnneE.Gwozdek,RDH,BA,MA326 factors affecting the Performance of oral Cancer Screenings by texas Dental Hygienists JaneC.Cotter,RDHBS;AnnL.McCann,RDH,PhD; EmetD.Schneiderman,PhD;JaniceP.DeWald,DDS; PatriciaR.Campbell,RDHMS335 Predicting national Dental Hygiene Board Examination Success BasedonSpecificAdmissionFactors LynnD.Austin,RDH,MPH,PhD340 FinancialManagementPracticesandAttitudesofDentalHygienists:A Descriptive Study KatherineRussell,RDH,MS;SandraStramoski,RDH,MSDH348 repetitive Coronal Polishing yields minimal Enamel loss SandraD.Pence,MS,RDH;DoyleA.Chambers,DMD; IanG.vanTets,PhD;RandallC.Wolf,DDS;DavidC.Pfeiffer,PhD
Critical Issues in Dental Hygiene
Review of the Literature
Linking Research to
Clinical Practice
-
242 The Journal of Dental Hygiene Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall 2011
Editorial
AlargenumberofindividualshavecontributedtomakingthispastyearalandmarkyearfortheJournalofDentalHygiene.Wesuccessfullymadethetransitiontoanonline-onlyformatand,onceagain, we have broken our previous record forthemostsubmissionsinasingleyear!Wehavealotofpeopletothankforthesuccesswehaveenjoyedthisyear.Ofcourse,noneofthiswouldbepossiblewithout theenergy,diligence, com-mitment and enthusiasm from a large numberof ADHAmembers and other professionalswhomakethepublicationpossible.
I wish to gratefully acknowledge the supportandvaluablecontributionsoftheAmericanDen-talHygienistsAssociationfortheircommitmentto the Journal and for recognizing the value ofscholarshiptothegrowthoftheprofession.Spe-cifically,IwishtothankourJournalStaffEditor,JoshSnyder forhisattention todetailandpro-
fessional manner. Also, thanks to Ann Battrell,ExecutiveDirector,andJeffMitchell,DirectorofCommunications, for their support and leader-shipattheADHA.
Weareproudofthepeerreviewprocessandthequalitypublicationsthatculminatefromtheeffortsoftheeditorialreviewboardandtheotheracademicianswhoassistuswithqualityreviews.These volunteers, whether regularmembers orguest reviewers,makeourpublicationone thatallofuscanbeproudofaswestrivetocontinu-ouslygrowourbodyofknowledge.
ThankYou!
Sincerely,
RebeccaWilder,RDH,BS,MSEditorinChief,JournalofDentalHygiene
ThankYou!RebeccaWilder,RDH,BS,MS
CelesteM.Abraham,DDS,MSCynthiaC.Amyot,MSDH,EdDJoannaAsadoorian,AAS,BScD,MScCarenM.Barnes,RDH,MSPhyllisL.Beemsterboer,RDH,MS,EdDStephanieBossenberger,RDH,MSLindaD.Boyd,RDH,RD,EdDKimberlyS.Bray,RDH,MSColleenBrickle,RDH,RF,EdDLorraineBrockmann,RDH,MSPatriciaRegenerCampbell,RDH,MSDanCaplan,DDS,PhDMarieCollins,RDH,EdDBarbaraH.Connonlly,DPT,EdD,FAPTAValerieJ.Cooke,RDH,MS,EdD,MEdMaryAnnCugini,RDH,MHPSusanJ.Daniel,BS,MSMicheleDarby,BSDH,MSDHJaniceDeWald,BSDH,DDS,MSSusanDuley,EdD,LPC,CEDS,RDH,EdSJacquelynM.Dylla,DPT,PTKathyEklund,RDH,MHPDeborahE.Fleming,RDH,MS
JournalofDentalHygieneEditorialReviewBoardJaneL.Forrest,BSDH,MS,EdDJacquelynL.Fried,RDH,MSMaryGeorge,RDH,BSDH,MEdKathyGeurink,RDH,MAJoanGluch,RDH,PhDMariaPernoGoldie,RDH,MSEllenB.Grimes,RDH,MA,MPA,EdDJoAnnR.Gurenlian,RDH,PhDLindaL.Hanlon,RDH,PhD,BS,MEdKittyHarkleroad,RDH,MSLisaF.HarperMallonee,BSDH,MPH,RD/LDHaroldA.Henson,RDH,MEdLauraJansenHowerton,RDH,MSOlgaA.C.Ibsen,RDH,MSMaryJacks,RDH,MSWendyKerschbaum,BS,MA,MPHSalmeLavigne,RDH,BA,MSDHJessicaY.Lee,DDS,MPH,PhDDeborahLyle,RDH,BS,MSDeborahS.Manne,RDH,RN,MSN,OCNAnnL.McCann,RDH,MS,PhDStacyMcCauley,RDH,MSGayleMcCombs,RDH,MS
-
Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall 2011 The Journal of Dental Hygiene 243
TanyaVillalpandoMitchell,RDH,MSTriciaMoore,RDH,BSDH,MA,EdDChristineNathe,RDH,MSKathleenJ.Newell,RDH,PhDJohannaOdrich,RDH,MS,PhD,MPHPamelaOverman,BS,MS,EdDVickieOverman,RDH,MEdFotinosS.Panagakos,DMD,PhDM.ElaineParker,RDH,MS,PhDCeibPhillips,MPH,PhDMarjorieReveal,RDH,MS,MBAKathiR.Shepherd,RDH,MSDeanneShuman,BSDH,MSPhD
JudithSkeleton,RDH,BSDH,MEd,PhDAnnEshenaurSpolarich,RDH,PhDRebeccaStolberg,RDH,BS,MSDHSherylL.ErnestSyme,RDH,MSTerriTilliss,RDH,PhDLynnTolle,BSDH,MSMargaretWalsh,RDH,MS,MA,EdDDonnaWarren-Morris,RDH,MEdCherylWestphal,RDH,MSKarenB.Williams,RDH,MS,PhDNancyWilliams,RDH,EdDCharlotteJ.Wyche,RDH,MSPamelaZarkowski,BSDH,MPH,JD
GuestReviewers,2011RolandArnold,PhDJenniferBrame,RDH,MSCharlesCobb,DDSLouisG.Depaola,DDS,MSTerryDonovanDDSSalNares,DDS,PhDRicardoPadilla,DDS
DavidPaquette,DMD,PhDLaurenPatton,DDSRocioQuinonez,DMD,MPH,MSAndreRitter,DDS,MSMariaRyan,DMD,PhDRoseD.Sheats,DMD,MPHEdwardSwift,DDS,MS
-
244 The Journal of Dental Hygiene Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall 2011
LinkingResearchtoClinicalPractice
GriffithsGS,AyobR,GuerroroA,etal.Amox-icillin and metronidazole as an adjunctivetreatment in generalized aggressive perio-dontitis at initial therapy or retreatment:arandomizedcontrolledclinical trial.JClinPeriodontol.2011;38(1):4349.
Background: Previously, we showed that sys-temicmetronidazole and amoxicillin significantlyimprovedtheoutcomesofnonsurgicaldebride-ment ingeneralizedaggressiveperiodontitis pa-tients.Thisstudyaimedtoobservewhetherretreatment with adjunctive antimicrobials wouldgivetheplacebogroupbenefitscomparablewiththetestgroup.
Methods: Thirtyeight of 41 subjects, from theinitial6monthtrial,completedthesecondphase,theretreatmentofsiteswithremainingpocketsof5mm.Subjectsonplaceboinphase1receivedadjunctiveantibiotics for7days.Clinicalparam-eterswerecollectedat2monthsposttreatment(8monthsfrombaseline).
Results:Patientswhoreceivedantibioticsatini-tial therapy showed statistically significant im-provement inpocketdepth reductionand in thepercentage of sites improving above clinicallyrelevantthresholds,comparedwithpatientswhoreceived antibiotics at retreatment. In deeppockets (7 mm), the mean difference was 0.9mm(p=0.003)and inmoderatepockets(4to6mm)itwas0.4mm(p=0.036).Pocketsconvert-ingfrom5to4mmwas83%comparedwith67%(p=0.041), and pockets converting from 4 to 3mmwas63%comparedwith49%(p=0.297).
Treating Aggressive Periodontitis
DeniseM.Bowen,RDH,MS
the purpose of linking research to Clinical Practice is to present evidence based information to clinical dental hygienists so that they can make informed decisions regarding patient treatment and recommendations. Each issue will feature a different topic area of importance to clinical dental hygienists with a Bottom linE to translatetheresearchfindingsintoclinicalapplication.
Conclusion:At8months,patientswhohadan-tibioticsatinitialtherapyshowedstatisticallysig-nificant benefits compared with those who hadantibioticsatretreatment.
Commentary
Current classifications of periodontal diseasesweredevelopedatthe1999WorldWorkshopfortheClassificationofPeriodontalDiseasesandCon-ditions.1Aggressiveperiodontitis,formerlyknownas earlyonset periodontitis/rapidly progressiveperiodontitis/juvenile periodontitis, was definedasrapidattachmentlossandbonedestructioninotherwisehealthyindividuals,withafamilialpat-ternandmicrobialdepositsthatare inconsistentwithseverityof tissuedestruction.The localizedformoccurs around puberty and affects incisorsandfirstmolars. The generalized formoften af-fectspeopleunder30yearsofage,butpatientsmaybeolder.Ingeneralizedaggressiveperiodon-titis(GAgP),generalizedinterproximalattachmentlossaffectsatleast3permanentteethotherthantheincisorsandfirstmolars.Invasiveperiodontalpathogens, neutrophil abnormalities and a poorserumantibodyresponseto infectingagentsarefrequently identified. These characteristics pro-vide the impetus for consideration of adjunctiveantimicrobialsinthetreatmentofaggressiveperi-odontitis.2
In a previous study, these authors concludedthata7day regimenof systemicmetronidazoleandamoxicillin (500mgeach,3 timesperday)significantly improved clinical outcomes of nonsurgicaldebridementinsubjectswithGAgPwhenadministered in conjunction with initial therapy.
-
Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall 2011 The Journal of Dental Hygiene 245
Thosefindingshavebeenreplicatedinotherstud-ies of initial therapy forGAgP. The focus of thisstudywastoassesswhethersystemicantibioticsin conjunctionwith fullmouth root surfacedeb-ridement (FMRSD) improve periodontal diseaseparameters better than FMRSD with a placeboinpatientswithGAgPwhenadministeredat retreatment.
Severalquestionsariseaboutthisdesign.Whywould the researcherswant to test theantibiot-icsatretreatmentiftheyknewthattheregimenwaseffectiveininitialtherapy?Whyareantibiot-ics considered in treatmentofGAgPandnot fortreatment of chronic periodontitis? How does aclinicianknowwhentoincludesystemicantibiot-icsinatreatmentplanfornonsurgicalperiodontaltherapy?
Research findings indicate that FMRSD forchronicperiodontitisiseffectivewithoutprescrib-ingantibioticsasadjuncts.Unnecessaryuseofan-tibiotics is also discouraged due to concerns about developmentofresistantstrainsofpathogensren-deringdrugs ineffective,risksandadversereac-tionsandcost.Asaresult,mostcliniciansattemptinitialtherapyforperiodontitiswithoutantibioticsandconsidertheiruseatreevaluationifitisde-terminedthatFMRSDwasineffective.
The researchers had previously treated onegroupofsubjectswithoutantibiotics.Theseindi-vidualscouldserveasthegroupreceivingantibi-oticsatretreatmentinphase2,andthosesubjectswhoreceivedantibioticsinthefirsttrialwouldre-ceiveFMRSDalone.Althoughtherewasimprove-ment inmost subjects after phase 1, siteswith5mmpocketsremained.Thefirstphaseofthestudyincludedinitialtherapywith2and6monthfollowups, and this study was implemented 2months later at reevaluation. Nineteen subjectsin each group entered the second phase of thestudy. The authors reported, based on a poweranalysis,that17subjectsineachgroupwouldbeanadequatesamplesizeforpowerneededtode-tectadifferenceof1mminpocketdepth(indeeppockets7mm),assuming1mmvariationisnor-mal.Thesamplesizeisonlyoneofseveralfactorsinassuringthereisenoughpowertodetectadif-ferenceinoutcomesifoneexists,andgenerallyalargersampleincreasesstatisticalpower.Currentguidelines for reportingclinical trials requireau-thorstoreportthisinformation.
Results indicated that antibiotics administeredatinitialtherapyweremoreeffectivethanadmin-istrationofthesameantibioticsatreevaluationbasedonpocketdepthreductionandpercentage
of sites that improved above clinically relevantthresholds. In periodontal therapy studies, it isimportanttodeterminewhetherresultsareclini-cally relevant or just statistically significant. Forexample, a statistically significant reduction of0.5mminpocketdepthsfrom7mmto6.5mmwouldnotprovideagoodprognosisforhealth.Aclinicianwouldnotwanttoadopttheinterventionfortheirpatients,eventhoughastudymayhavefoundasignificantdifference.Theseresearchersconducted an analysis to identify reductions in pocketsby2mmorreductionsinthenumberofpockets that would require additional treatment(5mmto4mmor4mmto3mm).Theseparameters represent criteria used in practiceto assess success of periodontal therapy at reevaluation. Findings from a comparison of bothgroups indicated that, in deep pockets (7mm),the mean difference in probing depth reductionwas0.9mm(p=0.003),andinmoderatepockets(4to6mm)itwas0.4mm(p=0.036).Forpock-etsconvertingfrom5mmto4mm,thegroupreceivingantibioticsatinitialtherapyhad83%ofsitesimprovedcomparedwith67%(p=0.041)atreevaluation.Forpocketsconvertingfrom4mmto 3 mm reduction, the percentage was 63%comparedwith49%(p=0.297).Theauthorsalsoreported a high incidence (42%) of adverse ef-fectsfromthemedicationwiththemajoritybeingminor such as mild nausea, vomiting, diarrhea,metallictasteorheadache.Theserisksneedtobeweighedagainsttheadvantagesofusingsystemicantibiotics in periodontal therapy, thereby rein-forcingtheirpotentialuseinGAgPcasesandnotinchronicperiodontitiscases.It is interestingtonotethatnoneofthepossiblesideeffectsof0.2%chlorhexidinemouthrinsewerereported,possiblybecausethesubjectsonlywererequiredtouseitfor2weeksfollowingthedebridement.
Although a statistically significant differencein pocket depth reduction was found from 0 to8months, itwas found inbothgroups,perhapsbecausebothgroupshadbeenexposed toanti-bioticsatsomepointintherapy.Themaineffectwasfoundinphase1(0to6months)whenan-tibiotics were administered with initial therapy.These findings would not support the commonapproachofdeliveringinitialtherapyandwaitingto see if itworkedbeforeprescribingantibioticsinpatientswithGAgP.Prescribingamoxicillinandmetronidazole(500mgeach,3timesaday)withFMSRDismoreeffectivewhenadministeredwithinitial therapy. A careful periodontal assessmentwith consideration of all criteria for an accurateperiodontal disease classification is indicated forappropriatecareplanning.
-
246 The Journal of Dental Hygiene Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall 2011
varela vm, Heller D, Silva mx, torres mC, Co-lombo aP, feresfilho EJ. Systemic antimicro-bialsadjunctivetoarepeatedmechanicalandantiseptic therapy for aggressive periodonti-tis:a6monthrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial.JPeriodontol.2011;82(8):11211130.
Background: The purpose of this study is tocomparetheadditionalbenefitofsystemicantimi-crobialsversusplacebostoarepeatedmechanicalinstrumentationcombinedwithcomprehensivelocalchemical plaque control for the periodontal treat-mentofGAgP.
Methods: This was a 6 month, randomized,doublemasked,placebocontrolledclinicaltrial.AllGAgPpatientsreceivedfullmouthdisinfectionfol-lowed by staged scaling and root planingwithout(placebogroup,n=17)orwith (test groupn=18)systemicantimicrobials(500mgamoxicillin[AMX]+250mgmetronidazole[MET],3timesadayfor10days).Clinicalparametersweremeasuredatbase-lineand3and6monthsposttherapy.SignificantdifferencesbetweengroupsatbaselineweresoughtbyusingtheMannWhitneyUtest,whereascom-parisonsovertimewereexaminedbyusingagen-erallinearmodelrepeatedmeasuresprocedure.
Results:Bothgroupsdemonstratedsimilar im-provements in most parameters over time. Thetestgrouppresentedagreatermeanprobingdepthreductionandclinicalattachment level (CAL)gainatsiteswith initiallymoderateprobingdepthat6months(p4mmat3months (p
-
Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall2011 TheJournalofDentalHygiene 247
the Bottom lineSummary
Each of these studies addressed the adjunctiveuse of antibiotics in patientswithGAgP. Althoughthis classification of periodontitis is less commonthanchronicperiodontitis,prevalencehasbeenes-timated to be 2% forGAgP and 4% for localizedaggressiveperiodontitisinindividualsbetweentheages of 18 and 30 years.3
Bothofthesestudiesprovidesupportforuseofsystemicantibioticsintheinitialnonsurgicaltreat-mentofGAgP.Bothauthorsalsoemphasizetheim-portanceofprudentuseofantibioticsinperiodon-taltherapybecauseofconcernsaboutsideeffects/adversereactions,developmentofresistantstrainsrenderingtheantibioticsineffectiveandcost.Basedonthefindingsofthesestudies,thefollowingcon-clusionscanbedrawn:
ForpatientswithGAgP,adjunctivetherapywithsystemic antibiotics (500 mg amoxicillin and500mgmetronidazole,3timesadayfor7or10days)withnonsurgicalperiodontaltherapy(fullmouth debridement, scaling and root planing)results in greater reduction of pocket depthsandclinicalattachmentgainsinmoderatepock-ets(4to6mm)whencomparedtononsurgicalperiodontaltherapyalone.Forpockets7mm,thisimprovementwasfoundat6monthsinonestudy,anddetectedonlyat3monthsinanother.Deeppocketsshouldbereferredforperiodontal
Evidencepresentedinthiscolumnindicatesthatadjunctiveantibioticsshouldbeconsideredintreat-mentplansforGAgP,despitethefactthattheyarenot recommended for initial treatment of chronicperiodontitis.Bothof these studieswerewellde-signedandprovidesupportfordentalhygieniststoalternormalcareplanningandtreatmentconsider-ationsforGAgPcases.
Denise M. Bowen, RDH, MS, is Professor Emerita in Dental Hygiene at Idaho State University. She has served as a consultant to dental industry, as well as numerous government, university and private organizations and presently is a member of the National Advisory Panel for the National Center for Dental Hygiene Research in the U.S.
any adverse effects. Several of the sideeffectsalsocouldbeattributedtothelongtermCHXusein thisstudyascomparedto the2weekregimenusedposttherapyintheformerstudy.Sideeffectsincludedoralulcerations,metallic taste,dizziness,nausea, diarrhea, tongue staining, teeth staining,taste alterations and mouth burning. The lowerdoseofMETwas intended to reduce sideeffects;however,theauthorsnotethatitispossiblethatthe250mgofMET3timesadayislesseffectivethanatahigherdosage,andcouldexplaintheminimaleffectinthetestgroupinthisstudy.
TheconclusiondrawnbytheauthorswasthattheuseofAMXandMETbroughtsomeadditionalclini-calbenefitstorepeatedSRPandantiseptictherapyforGAgPintheshortterm(3months),whichhadatendencytodisappearat6months.Thisconclusionisrelatedtotheauthorsidentifiedprimaryoutcomemeasureofdeeppockets(7mm)andtheclinicallyrelevantmeasureswhich included the percentageofsitesreducedby2mmorreducedto4mm.Itdoesnotdrawaconclusionaboutthemoderatepockets(4mmto6mm)whichdidmaintainsuc-cessfulreductionsat6months.
surgery. Systemic antibiotics added a benefit,especiallyinthemoderatecategoriesofprobingdepthandCAL.
Adjunctive systemic antibiotic therapy ismoreeffectivewhenadministeredwithinitialnonsur-gical periodontal therapy than when adminis-tered at reevaluation.
A thorough periodontal examinationwith con-sideration given to characteristics of aggressive periodontitisshouldbeperformedforallpatientsbetweentheagesof18and30years.Boneandattachmentlossinthemandibularincisorsandfirstmolars,aswellas3othersites,presenceofdepositsinconsistentwithdegreeofattachmentlossandafamilialpatternsuggestaclassifica-tionofGAgP.WhenGAgPisfound,consultationwiththedentistorperiodontistandtheadjunc-tive use of antibiotics should be considered in conjunctionwith initial nonsurgical periodontaltherapyratherthanwaitingtoseeifperiodontaldebridement/scaling/root planing alonewill beeffective at reevaluation.
references
Armitage GC. Development of a classification1. systemforperiodontaldiseasesandconditions.Ann Periodontol.1999;4(1):16.
Parameter on aggressive periodontitis. Ameri-2. canAcademy of Periodontology. J Periodontol. 2000;71(5Suppl):867869.
Demmer RT & Papapanou PN. Epidemiologic3. patternsofchronicandaggressiveperiodontitis.Periodontology 2000.2010;53:2844.
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0022-3492(2000)71L.867[aid=8760943]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0022-3492(2000)71L.867[aid=8760943]
-
248 The Journal of Dental Hygiene Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall 2011
introduction
Dental hygienists devote a large portionoftheirtimetoeducatingpa-tientsabouttheiroralhealth,dentalproceduresandpreventivemeasurestoencouragebetterhabits, increasetreatment success and assuage pa-tientfears.Clearcommunicationisavitalfactorinpatienteducation,butapatientshealthliteracyisalsoimpor-tantandoftenoverlookedbydentalhealth care professionals. Adequatehealth literacy enables patients tobecomeanactivepartof thedentalhealthcareprocessandtoactintheirownbestinterests.MillionsofAmeri-can adults, who are unable to readdentalpatienthealthorinsurancein-formation,areunableorunwillingtoadmit this deficit. A patients healthliteracy level can have farreachingand often surprising consequences.Researchhasshownthatliteracyskillspredict an individuals health statusmorestronglythanage,income,em-ploymentstatus,educationlevelandracial or ethnic group.1 Themodernhealth care system makes an unprecedented de-mandonpatientsliteracyskills.Tosuccessfullyne-gotiatethroughthesystem,patientsareexpectedtofindmoreinformationontheirown,understandandacceptnewrightsandresponsibilitiesandmakede-cisionsforthemselvesandothers.2 Dental hygienists areinauniquepositiontohelppatientswithloworalorgeneralhealthliteracy,thusempoweringthemtotakeanactiveroleintheiroralhealthcare.
Health literacy is not only the ability to read but includes the skills necessary to decipher dosagecharts, understand appointment slips, understanddoctorsdirectionsandcompletemedical,dentalorinsuranceforms.Improvedconsumerhealthliteracy
OralHealthLiteracyintheDentalOffice:TheUnrecognizedPatientRiskFactor
JulieH.Schiavo,MLIS,AHIP
abstractPurpose: According to the report Healthy People 2010, oralhealthliteracyisthedegreetowhichindividualshavetheca-pacity to obtain, process and understand basic health infor-mation and services needed tomake appropriate oral healthdecisions.Studieshave linkedapatientshealth literacy toavarietyofsignificanthealthbehaviors,statusesandoutcomes.ThisarticleprovidesanoverviewoftheliteratureconcerningthelevelsofhealthliteracyamongadultsintheU.S.,theeffectsofliteracylevelsontreatmentandpatientoutcomes,literacyas-sessmentinthepracticesettingandtheeffectsofapatientsliteracyon communicationwithadental healthprovider. Theimplications of inadequate patient oral health literacy on thepracticeofdentalhygienistsandcommunicationrecommenda-tionsarediscussed,asistheneedforfutureresearchspecifi-cally on oral health literacy.
Keywords:CommunicationBarriers,DentalHealthEducation,Health Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice, Health Promotion,LiteratureReview,OralHealth,OralHealthLiteracy,PatientAc-ceptanceofHealthCare,PatientParticipation,ProfessionalPa-tientRelations
ThisstudysupportstheNDHRApriorityarea,Health Promo-tion/DiseasePrevention:Assessstrategiesforeffectivecom-municationbetweenthedentalhygienistandclient.
CriticalIssuesinDental Hygiene
isdeemedso important that itwas includedasanobjectiveintheU.S.DepartmentofHealthandHu-manServicesHealthyPeople2010,andisapartoftheSurgeonGenerals 2000 report,OralHealth inAmerica.3,4Oralhealthliteracy,asdefinedbyHealthyPeople2010,isthedegreetowhichindividualshavethecapacitytoobtain,processandunderstandba-sichealthinformationandservicesneededtomakeappropriate oral health decisions.3,4 As a result of itsinclusioninHealthyPeople2010,healthliteracyresearch has greatly increased over the last decade. Researchersarestudyingtheeffectsoflowhealthlit-eracyonpatientsindifferentsettingsanddevelopinginstrumentstoaidintheidentificationofthosewhostrugglewithliteracy.
-
Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall 2011 The Journal of Dental Hygiene 249
Patient health literacy is consid-ered to be an important aspect ofpatientcarebytheAmericanDentalHygienistsAssociation(ADHA).TheADHAhaspresentedtotheInstituteofMedicine(IOM)committeesonoralhealth, includingAnOralHealth Ini-tiative,a studyconvenedby IOM in2010.Thestudy,comprisedofdentalhygienists, dentists, nurses, physi-cians,epidemiologistsandhealthpro-motionexperts,examinedoralhealthliteracyfromabroadperspectivewitha goal to increase oral health literacy inAmericans.5,6 ADHA has concluded thatapatientsliteracyisafactortobeevaluatedtodetermineapatientslevelofgeneralororalhealthriskintheStandardsofClinicalDentalHy-giene Practice.7
In2008,theAmericanDentalAs-sociation(ADA)HouseofDelegatespassedthefol-lowing 3 resolutions to promote communication intheprofession:
Theneed fordental professionals to communi-1. cateinaclear,accurateandeffectivemannerContinuedfundingthroughNationalInstitutesof2. Health,includingtheNationalInstituteofDentalandCraniofacialResearch,toencourageresearchin health literacyStrategic plan development through the ADA3. Council on Access, Prevention and Interprofes-sionalRelationsandother agencies to improvetheoralhealthliteracyofthepublic8
In2009,ADAsCouncilonAccess,PreventionandInterprofessionalRelationshipspublishedHealthLit-eracyinDentistryStrategicActionPlan20102015toprovideguidancetotheADA,dentalprofessionalsandpolicymakerstoimprovepatienthealthlitera-cybydevelopingasetofprinciples,goalsandevensomespecificstrategies.9
Thisliteraturereviewdiscussesthelevelsofhealthliteracyamongadults in theU.S.andtheeffectofliteracylevelsondentaltreatmentandpatientout-comes. Suggestions for health literacy assessmentinthepracticesettingarediscussedasarerecom-mendationsforeffectivecommunicationbetweenthedentalteamandthepatientwhostruggleswithlit-eracy.
adult literacy in america
TheNationalCenterofEducationalStatisticscon-ducted the National Assessment of Adult Literacy
Proficient
BelowBasic
Basic
Intermediate
Figure1:AdultHealthLiteracyLevels:ResultsfromtheNationalAssessmentofAdultLiteracy,2003
(NAAL)in2003toassesstheliteracyofU.S.adults.10 TheNAALwasadministeredtoapproximately30,000adults:18,000adultslivinginhouseholdsand12,000prison inmates.The followingresultsarebasedonthehouseholdsample.ParticipantsintheNAALsur-vey were grouped in 1 of 4 literacy levels: belowbasic,basic,intermediateandproficient,dependingontheirresponsestothequestions.TheresultsoftheassessmentgiveanaccuratesnapshotofadulthealthliteracyinAmerica(Figure1).10
Effects of Health literacy on treatment
The linkbetweenapatientshealth literacy levelanddentalormedicalprognosishasbeendemon-stratedbycurrent research.Patientswhohave in-sufficienthealthliteracylevelshavelessknowledgeabouttheirchronicmedicalconditionsandare lessable to manage the conditions.1113 They are at ahigher riskofbeinghospitalizedand tend to re-maininthehospitallongerthanpatientswithhigherhealthliteracyrates.Patientswithlowhealthliteracylevelsaremorepronetomakemedicationerrorsduetomisinterpretationsofdruglabelinstructionsoralackof knowledgeof dosingmethodsormeasure-ments.14,15Researchershavealsoconcludedthatin-adequatehealthliteracyhasastrongassociationwithmortalityinelderlypersons.16 Parental health literacy canaffectthehealthofachild.Childrenwithparentsorcaregiverswhohavelowhealthliteracyscoresaremorelikelytobehospitalized,engageinmoreriskyhealth behaviors and have less desirable health out-comesbothindentalandmedicalsituations.Studieshaveshownthatwhenparentalliteracyisimproved,childrenbenefit.1719
-
250 The Journal of Dental Hygiene Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall 2011
Figure2:StrategiesforAssessingLiteracyLevelsbytheDentalTeam
Health professionals tend not torecognizethesignsoflowhealthlit-eracyandarenotawareoftheirpa-tients reading levels. Studies havefoundthatbothphysiciansandresi-dentsconsistentlyoverestimatetheirpatients literacy levels and fail torecognize patients at risk of low lit-eracy.20,21 A health professionalsoverestimationofapatients literacylevelcanpresentabarriertoeffectivecommunicationandbedetrimentaltoapositivetreatmentoutcome.
assessing literacy in thePractice Setting
Patientswithlimitedhealthliteracycanbedifficulttoidentify,astheprob-lemisspreadacrosssocial,racialandeconomicborders.In2007,Jonesetalconcludedthatasignificantnumberofdentalpatientshavelowhealthlit-eracy.Thesepatientsexhibitalowerlevelofdentalknowledge,lessrecentdentalcareandworseselfperceivedoral health status.22
Thedentalhygienistcanlookforsignsthatapa-tient has a low literacy level. Patients with a lowliteracy levelwilloftenshow littleorno interest inwrittendocumentation,suchaspamphletsorhealthhistory forms,andwill oftenexpress frustrationorimpatiencewhenencouragedtouseprintedmateri-als.Apatientwithlowhealthliteracywilltakealongtime filling out forms andwill return them incom-pletelyorincorrectlycompleted.Apatientmaymakeexcusestoavoidreadingorcompletingaform,say-ingIforgotmyglassesathome,orImtootiredtoreadrightnow,Illtakeithomeanddoitlater.Poorreadersmayshowsignsofnervousness,confusion,frustrationoreven indifferenceandwithdraw fromsituationswheretheirreadingdifficultiesmaybeno-ticed.Patientsmayalsogivethewronganswerstoquestionsaboutsomethingtheyhavejustbeengiventoread.Adentalhygienistcanoftenspotapatientwhoishavingproblemsreadingbysimplywatchingthepatientseyes. Ifapatientseyeswanderoverthepage,donotfocusononeareaandthenmoveon,heorsheismostlikelynotactuallyreading.Poorreadersmayalsoholdthepaperclosetotheireyesorfollowthewordswiththeirfingerwhilereading.Anothersignoflowliteracyiswhenthepatientlooksat the pills inside a bottle rather than reading thelabelwhendescribingthepurposeofthemedication.Suchapatienthasassociated thesize, shapeandcolorofthepillwithitsintendedpurposeratherthanactually reading the label.23,24
Thedentalhygienistcantakeaproactiveapproachtohealthliteracyassessment.Iflowliteracyissus-pected,acasualconversationonthesubjectcanof-ten reveal valuable insight into apatients level ofliteracy.SimplyaskingapatientWhatdoyou liketoread?Areyouhappywiththewayyouread?orHowoftendoyouread?canbeginaconversationonthesubject.AstudybyWallaceetalin2006de-terminedthatclinicianscanidentifypatientswithlowliteracy levelsbyaskingthemthesimplequestion,Howconfidentareyoufillingoutmedicalformsbyyourself?Theanswerspatientsgavetothisquestioncorrespondedwelltotheirperformanceonformallit-eracyassessments.25Approachingapatientwithlowreadingabilitywithasimple,nonjudgmentalques-tionmayallowthehygienisttooffertheassistanceapatientneedswithoutcausinganyshameordis-comfort.
Ifamoreformalassessmentofhealthliteracyisdesired,thereareseveraloptionsavailable,suchastheRapidEstimateofAdultLiteracyinDentistry(RE-ALD),theTestofFunctionalHealthLiteracyinAdultsor theOral Health Literacy Instrument (Figures 2,3).2632Althoughhealthliteracyassessmentscanbeanimportanttoolforthedentalteam,aformalas-sessment,howeverbrief,maynotbeidealinanof-ficepracticesetting.Thereisapossibilityofcausingthepatientdiscomfort,alienationandshamewhena literacyassessmentbecomesapartofanexam.Personswho livewith the daily struggles resulting
-
Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall 2011 The Journal of Dental Hygiene 251
Figure3:PopularFormalHealthLiteracyAssessmentTools
Medical
REALM(RapidEstimateofAdultLiteracyinMedicine)
1991 Wordrecognitiontest 5min
REALM 1993 ShortenedversionofREALM 2min
Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults
1995 Readingcomprehensionandnumericalability
22min
NVS(NewestVitalSign) 2005 Literacyandnumeracyskills 3min
Dental
REALD30 2007 Wordrecognitiontest 510min
REALD99 2007 LongerversionofREALD30 510min
Test of Functional Health Literacy in Dentistry
2007 Readingcomprehensionandnumericalability
30min
Oral Health LiteracyInstrument
2009 Comprehension,numericalability,andgeneraloralhealthknowledge
45min
fromaninabilitytoreadwell develop elaboratecopingskillstohidetheirdeficiency, even fromthosetowhomtheyareclosest.Ifa literacyas-sessment becomes aregularpartofadentalexam,patientswithlowliteracy skills may be-gintoavoidofficesthatadminister such testsand not receive need-ed treatment. Formalhealth literacy assess-mentscanbesafelyad-ministered in researchsettings in which thepatientsareinformedofthepurposeofthestudyand give consent but arenotcurrentlyrecommendedasregularscreeningtechniques.33
Communication
Manyfactorscanaffectapersonsabilitytoread,comprehendanduseinformation.Thisistrueforallpersons,regardlessoftheirliteracylevel,butalowliteracylevelcancompoundsimpleproblems.Condi-tionsthatareinherentindentaltreatmentcanoftenmakeapatientsliteracyabilitydecrease.Stressandillnessareoftenthelargestcontributorstoapatientsinabilitytoread,understandorrememberahealthprovidersadvice.Eventhosewithgoodgenerallit-eracyskillsmayfinddentalandgeneralhealthcareinformationdifficulttounderstand,andasaresult,be hesitant to ask questions.24 Patients with lowhealthliteracyscoresdonotaskasmanyquestionsasthosewithsufficienthealthliteracyscores.Theyarelesslikelytoaskahealthcareprovidertorepeataconcepttheydonotunderstand.Dentalhealthcareprovidersmustbeawareofthisandtakemeasurestomakethemselvescleartothepatient.34
Apatientsageandthenormalagingprocesscanaffecthealthliteracylevels.Amongthemanyfactorsarethegenerationalcultureofapatientandphysi-calormentalhealthconditions.Anelderlypatientsbackgroundcanaffectinteractionwithahealthpro-vider. Many elderly patients grew up in a culturewhereonedidnotquestiontherecommendationsofahealthcareprovider.Thepatientwastodoastoldregardlessoftheirunderstandingofthetreatment.Factorssuchasalossofvisual,auditoryormentalacuityintheagedpopulationalsochangeapatientshealthliteracylevels.Readingabilityscorestendtodeclinedramaticallyaftertheageof55.23
Languagebarrierscanbeacontributor toapa-tients low health literacy level. When a person isunder stress, comprehension and communicationareinherentlyeasierinapatientsnativelanguage.If that language is not the languageof thehealthprovider, communication will be hindered. Spokenlanguageskillsandreadingskillscanbedrasticallydifferentwithinthegeneralpopulation,andthesedif-ferencescanbegreatlymagnifiedinpersonswhoarecommunicating ina language that isnotnative tothem.
Culturaldifferencesmustalsobeconsideredunderthescopeofapatientshealthliteracy.Manyculturesgive the familypriorityover the individual, andasaresult,healthrelateddecisionmakingisdoneasa familyunit thepatientmaynotbe thepersonresponsibleformakingthedecisionsforthefamily.Apatientmaynotbecomfortableaskingquestionsofahealthprofessionalofadifferentgenderorsta-tus.Someculturesadvocateshowingdeferenceandpoliteness to thosewhoareperceivedasauthorityfigures,suchashealthcareproviders.Often,inanattempt tonot offendor appear confrontational, apatient fromsuchaculturewillnotaskquestions.Suchdifferences canmake communicationdifficultforthepatientandtheprovidermustinsurethepa-tientunderstandsthediagnosis,treatmentplanandramificationsofnotfollowingthetreatmentplan.35
Itisimportantforthedentalhygienisttousegoodcommunication skills when treating patients whohavelowhealthliteracy.Theamountofinformationinitiallygivenshouldbelimitedtowhatthepatientneedstoknowasopposedtowhatisgoodtoknow.Theprovidershouldfocuson3to5mainpointsthepatient should know to aid in comprehension. Re-
-
252 The Journal of Dental Hygiene Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall 2011
searchhasconcludedthatlessthan50%oftheinfor-mationconveyedtoapatientduringthecourseofanappointmentwillberetained.36Dentalofficesshouldstrivetomaintainashamefreeenvironment.Allpatientsshouldbeofferedassistanceandstaffshouldnevertrytosingleoutpatientstheybelievehavelowhealthliteracyskills.2,37
Usingplainlanguagethatissimple,easilyunder-stoodandjargonfree is important inensuringthepatientunderstands.Dentalhygienistsaresurround-ed by technical terms and jargon as part of theireducationanddailypracticethelanguageusedbyprovidersisoftennoteasilyunderstoodbythedentalpatientandtheirfamily.Usingeverydaylanguagetoconveymeaningismucheasieronboththeproviderandthepatient.Termssuchascavitiesasopposedtocaries,orgumdiseaseasopposedtoperiodontaldiseasecanimprovepatient/providercommunication(Figure4).
Dentalhygienistsshouldalwaysexplaintherea-
sonswhyatreatmenthasbeenrecommendedandemphasizethebenefitsofcomplyingwiththetreat-mentplan. It is important tobe clearandconcisewhenexplaininghowapatient should comply. Pa-tientscaneasilybecomeconfusedwithdentalcaredevices,oralrinsesormedicationiftheiruseisnotsufficientlyexplained.Drawingpictures,usingvisualaidsoractivedemonstrationswillaidinthecompre-hension of directions. Dental hygienists should also remembertospeakslowlyandallowforampletimeforthepatienttovoiceanyquestions.Althoughtheurgetorepeatdirectionsinaloudervoicewhennotunderstood is strong, research has shown it actu-ally distracts from the understanding of the mes-sage.Communicationismorelikelyifthehygienistrethinksthewordsandmannerusedtoconveythemessage.39
Patientswithlowliteracylevelsoftenhavehighlydevelopedcopingsystems thathaveallowed themtofunctioninsociety.Ifaskedbyahealthprovideriftheyunderstandtheinformationthattheyhavebeen
MedicalTerm Plain Language alternative
Halitosis Badbreath
Hypertension Highbloodpressure
Immediate Rightaway
Inflammation Pain,swelling,heat,redness
Intake Whatyoueatordrink
Migraine Very bad headache
Neglect Donttakecareof
NonPrescription Youcanbuyitwithoutaprescription
Occlusion Wayteethfittogetherwhenyoubite
Oral Mouth
Orthodontics Braces
Palate Roofofyourmouth
Periodontal disease Gumdisease
Permanent Lasting forever
Pulp Tooth nerves
Refrain Stayawayfrom;stopdoing
RootCanal Removalofdamagedtoothnerve
Severe Verybad;dangerous
Sideeffect Effectcausedbyamedicineyoutake
Symptoms Whatyouarefeeling;signs
Toxic Poisonous
Xerostoma Drymouth
TempromandibularJoint
Jointthatattachesjawtoskull
Figure4:MedicalTermsandPlainLanguageAlternatives
MedicalTerm Plain Language alternative
Abscess Pocketofinfection
Allergen Somethingyouareallergicto
Amalgam Fillingmaterial
Analgesic Painkiller
Antiinflammatory Lessensswelling,fever,orpain
Benign Not cancer
Bridge False teeth
Bruxism Grindingyourteeth
Carcinoma Cancer
Cardiacproblems Heartproblems
Caries Cavities;toothdecay
Chronic Constant;lifelongcondition
Confidential Private,secret
Crown Caporcoveroveryourtooth
Deciduous teeth Babyteeth;firstsetofteeth
Denture False teeth
Diagnosis Causeornameofyourillness
Drug interaction Onedrugseffectonanotherdrug
Enlarge Getbigger
Extraction Pull a tooth
Function Doesthejob;action
Gingivitis Gumdisease
Sealants Coatingpaintedonteethtopreventcavities
Adaptedfrom:ClearHealthCommunication:MediaWordstoWatch.38
-
Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall 2011 The Journal of Dental Hygiene 253
ConclusionThroughawareness of oral health literacy, dental
hygienistscanenhancethepatientsroleintheirownhealthcare.MillionsofAmericanadultshavehealthliteracyproblemswhicharenotrelatedtointelligenceoreducationmanyfactorsplayaroleinhowapa-tientcanunderstandandprocesshealthinformationatanytime.Patientshealthliteracyrateshavebeenlinked toprognosis, complianceandevenmortality,yetmanydentalhealthprofessionalsmaynotevenbeawarethepatientishavingaproblem.Oralhealthliteracy canbedetermined inmanydifferentways.Formal assessments can be conducted or informal,conversational, questionsmay be asked of the pa-tient.Withthisinformation,adentalhygienistcantai-lororalhealthinformationtothepatientsneeds.Plainlanguageandassurancethatquestionsarewelcomedandassistance isavailablewillgiveapatientconfi-denceinthedentalhygienistandtheofficeorclinic.
Health literacy is a relatively new subject in themedical and dental literature. Research is growingrapidly, but hasbeendominatedby studiesheld inmedicalsettings.Althoughsomeresearchhasbeendoneontheimplicationsofinadequateoralhealthlit-eracyinspecificallythedentalsetting,moreresearchis needed.
Julie H. Schiavo, MLIS, AHIP, is an Instructor of Medical Bibliography and Dental Reference Librarian at the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans, School of Dentistry. She is a Distinguished member of the Academy of Health Information Specialists and has received a Level II Specialization in Consumer Health Information from the Medical Library Association in 2011. She is also currently pursuing a Certificate in Advanced Study in Health Science Librarianship from the University of Pittsburghs School of Information Sciences and Health Sciences Library System.
acknowledgments
IwouldliketoexpressmysinceregratitudetoMs.ElizabethStrotherMLS,MBA,AssociateDirector forDental Library Services, Louisiana State UniversityHealth Sciences Center New Orleans, for all hersupportandencouragementduringtheresearchandwritingofthismanuscriptandwhileIampursuingmyCertificateinAdvancedStudies.
giventoread,patientswillalmostalwaysreplyintheaffirmativeinanattempttonotadmittheirdeficien-cies.Ahealthprovidershouldseekthisinformationinanonjudgmentalandcasualmanner.Tellingpa-tients thatmanypeoplehaveproblemswith theseinstructionswillgivepatientsanopportunitytoadmittheirignoranceandstillkeeptheirpride.23
TheTeachBackTechniquecanbeausefultooltoensure that a patient understands the instructionsfromahealthcareprovider.Byusingthistechnique,theproviderasksthepatienttorepeattheinstruc-tionsintheirownwordsordemonstratetheconcept.Thiscanbeaccomplishedinseveralnonthreateningand nonjudgmental ways. Patients should not beaskedquestionsthatcanbeansweredwithayesornoresponselearningwillbereinforcedifpatientsareaskedtosupplyinformationordemonstrateandrestateconcepts.40AnothertoolistheAskMe3ed-ucation program developed by the Partnership forClearHealthCommunication.AskMe3isanofficephilosophythatseekstocommunicatetothepatientthatthedentalteaminthatofficewanttoanswer3mainquestions:Whatismymainproblem?WhatdoIneedtodo?Whyisitimportantformetodothis?Patientsareencouragedthroughposters,brochuresandflyersplacedthroughouttheofficeorclinictoaskthesequestions,writedowntheanswersandbringtheinformationhomewiththem.41
Patient education pamphlets, booklets or otherwrittenmaterialareusefulinprovidingpatientstheinformation theyneedaboutprivacy,dental condi-tions, procedures or treatment options. However,readinglevelmustbeconsideredwhenchoosingthematerial.Ifadentalhygienistprovidespatientswithpamphletsorotherhealthinformationinprintform,theyshouldbewritten innohigher thanafifthorsixthgradelevel.TheaverageAmericanreadsataseventhtoninthgradelevelhealthrelatedmateri-alsareoftenwrittenatamuchhigherlevel.42Ifpos-sible,writtenmaterialshouldbeillustratedwithcleargraphics.43Pamphletsshouldfocusonafewmainim-portantfactsstatedasclearlyaspossible.HealthIn-surance Portability and Accountability Act notices and informedconsentpaperworkareevenmoredifficultforapatientwithliteracyconcernsasthenatureofthedocumentsrequirethemtobewrittenatahigherreading level.42,44,45
-
254 The Journal of Dental Hygiene Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall 2011
Healthliteracy:reportoftheCouncilonScientificAf-1. fairs. AdHocCommittee onHealth Literacy for theCouncilonScientificAffairs,AmericanMedicalAssocia-tion. JAMA.1999;281(6):552557.
NielsenBohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA, editors.2. HealthLiteracy:aPrescriptiontoEndConfusion.Com-mitteeonHealthLiteracyBoardonNeuroscienceandBehavioralHealth, InstituteofMedicine.WashingtonDC:NationalAcademiesPress;2004.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.3. Healthypeople2010.U.S.DepartmentofHealthandHumanServices,NationalInstituteofDentalandCran-iofacialResearch,NationalInstitutesofHealth.2000.
U.S.DepartmentofHealthandHumanServices.Oral4. healthinAmerica:areportoftheSurgeonGeneral.U.S.DepartmentofHealthandHumanServices,Na-tionalInstituteofDentalandCraniofacialResearch,Na-tionalInstitutesofHealth.2000.
ADHA Presents at Second IOM Oral Health Study.5. American Dental Hygienists Association [Internet].2010April[cited2010July15].Availablefrom:http://www.adha.org/media/releases/04012010_IOM.htm
Activities:AnOralHealthInitiative.InstituteofMedicine6.oftheNationalAcademies[Internet].2010[cited2010July15].Available from:http://www.iom.edu/Activi-ties/HealthServices/OralHealthInitiative.aspx
StandardsofClinicalDentalHygienePractice.American7.DentalHygienistsAssociation[Internet].2008[cited2010July15].Availablefrom:http://www.adha.org/downloads/adha_standards08.pdf
CrozierS.OralhealthliteracycontinuestobeHODpri-8. ority.AmericanDentalAssociation[Internet].2008No-vember17[cited2010July15].Availablefrom:http://ada.org/news/1780.aspx
HealthLiteracyinDentistryStrategicActionPlan20109. 2015.AmericanDental Association [Internet]. 2009[cited2010July15].Availablefrom:http://ada.org/sections/professionalResources/pdfs/topics_access_health_literacy_dentistry.pdf
KutnerM,GreenbergE,JinY,PaulsenC.TheHealthLit-10. eracyofAmericasAdults:ResultsFromthe2003Na-tionalAssessmentofAdultLiteracy.U.S.DepartmentofEducation[Internet].2006[cited2010July22].Avail-ablefrom:http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006483.pdf
PowellCK,HillEG,ClancyDE.Therelationshipbetween11. healthliteracyanddiabetesknowledgeandreadinesstotakeaction.Diabetes Educ.2007;33(1):144151.
GazmararianJA,WilliamsMV,PeelJ,BakerDW.Health12. literacyandknowledgeofchronicdisease.Patient Educ Couns.2003;51(3):267275.
NeedhamHE,WiemannCM,TortoleroSR,ChackoMR.13. Relationshipbetweenhealthliteracy,readingcompre-hension, and risk for sexually transmitted infectionsinyoungwomen.J Adolesc Health.2010;46(5):506508.
WolfMS,DavisTC,ShrankW,etal.Toerrishuman:14. Patientmisinterpretationsofprescriptiondruglabelin-structions. Patient Educ Couns.2007;67(3):293300.
YinHS,MendelsohnAL,WolfMS,etal.Parentsmedi-15. cation administration errors: Role of dosing instru-mentsandhealthliteracy.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(2):181186.
BakerDW,WolfMS,FeinglassJ,ThompsonJA,Gazma-16.rarianJA,HuangJ.Healthliteracyandmortalityamongelderlypersons.Arch Intern Med.2007;167(14):15031509.
DeWaltDA,HinkA.Healthliteracyandchildhealthout-17.comes:Asystematicreviewoftheliterature.Pediatrics. 2009;124(Suppl3):S265274.
Wolf MS, Wilson EA, Rapp DN, et al. Literacy and18. learning in health care. Pediatrics. 2009;124(Suppl3):S275281.
JacksonR.Parentalhealthliteracyandchildrensden-19. talhealth: Implications for the future.Pediatr Dent. 2006;28(1):7275.
KellyPA,HaidetP.Physicianoverestimationofpatient20. literacy:apotentialsourceofhealthcaredisparities.Patient Educ Couns.2007;66(1):119122.
BassPF3rd,WilsonJF,GriffithCH,BarnettDR.Resi-21. dentsabilitytoidentifypatientswithpoorliteracyskills.Acad Med.2002;77(10):10391041.
JonesM,LeeJY,RozierRG.Oralhealthliteracyamong22. adultpatientsseekingdentalcare.J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138(9):11991208.
BakerDW,ParkerRM,WilliamsMV,etal.Thehealth23. careexperienceofpatientswithlowliteracy.Arch Fam Med.1996;5(6):329334.
references
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=1063-3987(1996)5:6L.329[aid=8805376]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=1063-3987(1996)5:6L.329[aid=8805376]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=1040-2446(2002)77:10L.1039[aid=9588897]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0164-1263(2006)28:1L.72[aid=9739799]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0164-1263(2006)28:1L.72[aid=9739799]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0738-3991(2003)51:3L.267[aid=9562136]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0738-3991(2003)51:3L.267[aid=9562136]http://www.adha.org/media/releases/04012010_IOM.htmhttp://www.iom.edu/Activihttp://www.adha.org/downloads/adha_standards08.pdfhttp://www.adha.org/downloads/adha_standards08.pdfhttp://ada.org/sections/professionalResources/pdfs/topics_access_health_literacy_dentistry.pdfhttp://ada.org/sections/professionalResources/pdfs/topics_access_health_literacy_dentistry.pdfhttp://ada.org/sections/professionalResources/pdfs/topics_access_health_literacy_dentistry.pdfhttp://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006483.pdf
-
Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall 2011 The Journal of Dental Hygiene 255
CornettS.Assessingandaddressinghealth literacy.24. OnlineJournalof Issues inNursing[Internet].2009September30 [cited2010 June8].Available from:http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofCon-tents/Vol142009/No3Sept09/AssessingHealthLiter-acy.aspx
WallaceLS,RogersES,RoskosSE,HolidayDB,Weis25. BD.Briefreport:screeningitemstoidentifypatientswith limitedhealth literacyskills. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(8):874877.
DavisTC,CrouchMA,LongSW,etal.Rapidassess-26.mentofliteracylevelsofadultprimarycarepatients.Fam Med.1991;23(6):433435.
DavisTC,LongSW,JacksonRH,etal.Rapidestimate27.ofadultliteracyinmedicine:Ashortenedscreeningin-strument.Fam Med.1993;25(6):391395.
ParkerRM,BakerDW,WilliamsMV,NurssJR.TheTest28. ofFunctionalHealthLiteracyinAdults:Anewinstru-mentformeasuringpatientsliteracyskills.J Gen Intern Med.1995;10(10):537541.
PfizerClearHealthCommunicationInitiative.TheNew-29. estVitalSign:anewhealthliteracyassessmenttoolforhealthcareproviders.Pfizer[Internet].2008[cited2010June8].Availablefrom:http://www.pfizerhealth-literacy.com/physiciansproviders/NewestVitalSign.aspx
RichmanJA,LeeJY,RozierRG,GongDA,PahelBT,Vann30. WFJr.Evaluationofawordrecognitioninstrumenttotesthealthliteracyindentistry:TheREALD99.J Public Health Dent.2007;67(2):99104.
LeeJY,RozierRG,LeeSY,BenderD,RuizRE.Develop-31. mentofawordrecognitioninstrumenttotesthealthliteracyindentistry:TheREALD30abriefcommuni-cation. J Public Health Dent.2007;67(2):9498.
SabbahiDA,LawrenceHP,LimebackH,RootmanI.32. Developmentandevaluationofanoralhealthliteracyinstrumentforadults.Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009;37(5):451462.
PaascheOrlowMK,WolfMS.Evidencedoesnotsup-33. port clinical screeningof literacy. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;23(1):100102.
KatzMG,JacobsonTA,VeledarE,KirpalaniS.Patient34. literacyandquestionaskingbehaviorduringthemedi-calencounter:Amixedmethodsanalysis.J Gen Intern Med.2007;22(6):782786.
Singleton K, Krause EM. Understanding cultural35. and linguistic barriers to health literacy. Ky Nurse. 2010;58(4):4,69.
OngLM,deHaesJC,HoosAM,LammesFB.Doctor36.patientcommunication:areviewoftheliterature.Soc Sci Med.1995;40(7):903918.
ParikhNS,ParkerRM,NurssJR,BakerDW,Williams37.MV.Shameandhealthliteracy:theunspokenconnec-tion. Patient Educ Couns.1996;27(1):3339.
WordstoWatch.Pfizer[Internet].[cited2011Octo-38. ber3].Availablefrom:http://www.pfizerhealthliteracy.com/media/WordsToWatch.aspx
BergerCR,DiBattistaP.Communicationfailureandplan39. adaption:Ifatfirstyoudontsucceed,sayitlouderandslower.Communication Monographs.1993;60(3):220238.
HorowitzAM,KleinmanDV.Oralhealthliteracy:The40. newimperativetobetteroralhealth.Dent Clin North Am.2008;52(2):333344.
AskMe3.NationalPatientSafetyFoundation[Inter-41. net].2007[cited2010June8].Availablefrom:http://www.npsf.org/askme3/
PeregrinT.Picturethis:visualcuesenhancehealthedu-42. cationmessagesforpeoplewithlowliteracyskills.J Am Diet Assoc.2010;110(4):500505.
AlexanderRE.Readabilityofpublisheddentaleduca-43. tionalmaterials.J Am Dent Assoc.2000;131(7):937942.
KangE,FieldsHW,CornettS,BeckFM.Anevaluation44. ofpediatricdentalpatienteducationmaterialsusingcontemporaryhealthliteracymeasures.Pediatr Dent. 2005;27(5):409413.
HaAT,GanskySA.HIPAAnoticeofprivacypractices45. usedinU.S.dentalschools:factorsrelatedtoreadabil-ityorlackthereof.J Dent Educ.2007;71(3):419429.
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0164-1263(2005)27:5L.409[aid=9739806]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0164-1263(2005)27:5L.409[aid=9739806]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0002-8177(2000)131:7L.937[aid=9473472]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0011-8532(2008)52:2L.333[aid=9473476]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0011-8532(2008)52:2L.333[aid=9473476]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0363-7751(1993)60:3L.220[aid=9739808]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0363-7751(1993)60:3L.220[aid=9739808]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0738-3991(1996)27:1L.33[aid=9588894]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0277-9536(1995)40:7L.903[aid=3264760]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0277-9536(1995)40:7L.903[aid=3264760]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0301-5661(2009)37:5L.451[aid=9739812]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0301-5661(2009)37:5L.451[aid=9739812]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0884-8734(1995)10:10L.537[aid=9562153]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0884-8734(1995)10:10L.537[aid=9562153]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0742-3225(1993)25:6L.391[aid=6893014]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0884-8734(2006)21:8L.874[aid=9588893]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0884-8734(2006)21:8L.874[aid=9588893]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0022-4006(2007)67:2L.94[aid=9473478]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0022-4006(2007)67:2L.99[aid=9473477]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0022-4006(2007)67:2L.99[aid=9473477]http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/http://www.pfizerhealthhttp://www.pfizerhealthliteracyhttp://www.npsf.org/askme3/
-
256 The Journal of Dental Hygiene Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall 2011
introductionSomeof thefirstmicroorganisms
studied in thedawnofmicrobiologyoriginatedfromdentalplaque.Dutchscientist Antonie van Leeuwenhoekperformedsomeofhisinitialexperi-ments on scrapings of plaque fromhis teeth, and these studies wouldestablishthefoundationsformodernmicrobiology. In one of his studies,hedescribedscrapingthewhitema-terial lodgedbetweenhisgumsandteeth,inwhichheobservedmovinganimalcules.1Atthetime,Leeuwen-hoek only had the aid of a micro-scopetoanalyzethemicroorganismsheobservedfromtheteethscrapingsamples.Someoftheorganismsde-scribedbyvanLeeuwenhoek,thoughunknownatthetime,werethemostabundantmicroorganismspresentinthe oral cavity.
W.D.Miller,apracticingdentist inthe1890s,spentmuchofhistimean-alyzingthemicrobesfoundintheoralcavity.He laterwroteabook calledMicroorganismsoftheHumanMouth,whichdiscussedthetheorythatmi-croorganisms present in the mouthwereagroupofbacteriaworkingto-gether.2 These initial studies on dental biofilmshaveinspiredfurtherstudiesoftheorganismsthatliveintheoralcavity.Today,dentalbiofilmsaredefinedasadiversecommunityofmicroorganisms living as a structural unit,withcomplex communication pathways between spe-cies.3Thesemicrobialcolonieshavealsobeenfoundtocausedentalcariesandperiodontaldisease.4
Dentalplaqueisawellorganizedbiofilmthatat-tachestothetoothsurface.Itslocationinthemouthallowsforaconstantsourceofmoisture,nutrients,warmth and surface, all ofwhich contribute to itsgrowth. The inhabitants of themouth are incred-iblydiverse,andmutualisticrelationshipsoftentakeplace.Whilesomemicrobesoccupythenichepro-
DentalDiagnostics:MolecularAnalysisofOralBiofilmsSarahHiyari,MS;KatieM.Bennett,PhD
abstractPurpose:Dentalbiofilmsarecomplex,multispeciesbacterialcommunitiesthatcolonizethemouthintheformofplaqueandareknowntocausedentalcariesandperiodontaldisease.Bio-filmsareuniquefromplanktonicbacteriainthattheyaremu-tualisticcommunitieswitha3dimensionalstructureandcom-plexnutritionalandcommunicationpathways.Thehomeostasiswithinthebiofilmcolonycanbedisrupted,causingashiftinthebacterialcompositionofthecolonyandresultinginproliferationofpathogenicspecies.Becauseofthisdynamiclifestyle,tradi-tionalmicrobiologicaltechniquesareinadequateforthestudyofbiofilms.Manyofthebacteriapresentintheoralcavityareviablebutnotculturable,whichseverelylimitslaboratoryanal-ysis.However,with theadventof newmolecular techniques,themicrobialmakeupoforalbiofilmscanbebetteridentified.SomeofthesetechniquesincludeDNADNAhybridization,16SrRNAgenesequencing,denaturinggradientgelelectrophoresis,terminalrestrictionfragmentlengthpolymorphism,denaturinghighperformanceliquidchromatographyandpyrosequencing.Thisreviewprovidesanoverviewofbiofilmformationandex-aminesthemajormoleculartechniquescurrentlyusedinoralbiofilmanalysis.Futureapplicationsofthemolecularanalysisoforalbiofilmsinthediagnosisandtreatmentofcariesandperi-odontal disease are also discussed.
Keywords:dentalbiofilm,dentalplaque,oralhealth,PCR,bac-teria,moleculartechniques,16SrRNA,sequencing
ThisstudysupportstheNDHRApriorityarea,Clinical Dental HygieneCare:Assesshowdentalhygienistsareusingemerg-ingsciencethroughoutthedentalhygieneprocessofcare.
videdbythehost,otherspeciesmayonlythriveinthepresenceoftheprimarycolonizers.Further,thedevelopingcolonymaypreventcompetingspeciesofbacteriafromcolonizingbymonopolizingspaceandresources.Thismutualisticrelationshipisanimpor-tantaspectinthedevelopmentofbiofilmsingener-al,andmodernresearchtechniqueshaveexpandedour understanding of the ecology of oral bacterial communities.
Dental plaque formation is unique from typicalbiofilmformationduetothenatureoftheoralen-vironment.Tartar,orcalculus,isacalcifieddepositontheteeththatisformedbythecontinuouspres-enceofplaque.Theroughsurfaceofthetartarpro-
ReviewoftheLiterature
-
Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall2011 TheJournalofDentalHygiene 257
videsan ideal place forplaque toaccumulate.Al-mostimmediately,asalivaryglycoproteinfilmcalledapelliclecoatsacleantooth.Thepellicleallowsfortheadherenceofgrampositiveprimarycolonizers,which include Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus anguisandActinomycetespecies.5,6Thebiofilmmasscontinuestoincreaseduetothemultiplicationoftheprimarycolonizers,whichprovidesaplaceforotherorganismstosubsequentlyattach.Inaspanof1to3days,thesecondarycolonizersadheretothegrampositiveprimarycolonizers.Thesesecond-arycolonizersaregenerallygramnegativespeciesandtypicallyincludeFusibacteriumnucleatum,Pre-vatellaspeciesandCapnocytophagaspecies.6Inthefinalstageofdentalbiofilmformation,thetertiarycolonizersattach,andthereisanoverallshiftfromgrampositivefacultativemicrobestogramnegativeanaerobes.46
Thethrivingbiofilmmayresultincariogeniccon-ditionsthatcanleadtocaries,oraffecttheadjacentsofttissueandresultinperiodontaldisease.Further,chronic oral infections have also been associated withsystemicdiseases,suchasdiabetesandheartdisease,duetothespreadoforalmicrobesintothebloodstream,and tocertain lungdiseasesdue totheaspirationoftheplaqueintotherespiratorysys-tem.7,8Thus,oralbiofilmshavehealthconsequencesbeyondinfectionsofthemouth,andnovelmethodsfor eradication or control of these colonies are need-ed.
Intraditionalmicrobiology,theindividualcellunitis typically the focus.However, in thecaseofbio-filmsanddentalbiofilmsinparticular,thewholeor-ganism isworking togetherandeachbacterium isdependentontheotherspeciespresent.3Therefore,typicalmicrobiologicalapproachesmaynotbesuf-ficientfortheidentificationorstudyofbiofilmform-ingbacteria.Treatmentstrategiesmustincorporateamoreholistic,ecologicalapproach to thecontrolofthedentalbiofilm.Anunderstandingoftheetiol-ogyofdiseasescausedbyoralbiofilmsfirstrequiresidentificationofthebacterialspeciesinvolved,whichisbestaccomplishedusingmoleculargenetictech-niques.Thisreviewsummarizesmanyofthemolec-ulartechniquesthatmaybeutilizedinthedetectionofbacterialspeciesindentalbiofilmsanddiscussesthefutureofmoleculardiagnosticsindentalhygienepractice.
MethodsusedforStudyofBiofilmsDuetothecomplexmultispecieslifestyleofdental
biofilms,uniqueresearchmethodshavebeendevel-opedforthestudyoftheseorganisms.Traditionalculturingmethodsofbacteriaareofteninsufficientfortheanalysisofbiofilms,becausemanybacteria
thatarepresentintheoralcavityareconsideredvi-able but not culturable.9Ithasbeensuggestedthatlessthan1%ofmicroorganismscanbeculturedinthe laboratory,meaning that the vastmajority oforalbacteriaevadestandardmicrobiologicaldetec-tionmethods.9ThishasleadtothedevelopmentofalternativemethodstoassessdentalbiofilmsbasedonDNAanalysisorothermoleculartechniques.Bylearningmoreaboutthegeneticsandbiochemistryoftheorganism,wecanderivebetterstrategiesfortreating infection.Biofilmcolonyhomeostasis is adelicatebalance,andwhendisrupted,pathologicalspeciescanpredominate.5DNAanalysiscanallowidentificationofallofthespeciespresentinanoralbiofilm, ofwhich only 1 or 2 speciesmay be thepathological culprits.Byknowingwhichspeciesofbacteriaarepresent in theoral cavity,new treat-mentoptionscanbedevelopedthatwould,inturn,providebetterdentalcare.TableIsummarizeseachmoleculartechniquediscussedbelow.
CheckerboardDNADNAHybridization
DNADNA hybridization is considered the goldstandardoforalbiofilmanalysis.Itwasdevelopedby Socransky et al for the synchronized process-ingoflargenumbersofsamplesandtheprofilingofmultiplespecieswithinthesamesampleinasemiquantitativemanner.10 The technique relies on the bindingofDNA isolated frombacterialsamples toamembrane, followed by hybridization with DNAprobes specific to at least 40 different bacterialspecies.10Thismethodisveryusefulforanalyzingdentalplaquebecauseofthesimultaneousprocess-ingoflargenumbersofsamples.11 The technology hasbeenable todetectmicrobespresentonoralsurfaces,biofilmcompositioninperiodontaldiseaseandbacterialprevalenceinspecificoralcommuni-ties.1215Furthermore,thistechniquehasbeenusedtoassesstheoutcomeoftherapeutictreatment.16
Because of the use of whole genome probes,DNADNAhybridizationwasoriginally limitedonlytotheidentificationofspeciesthatcanbecultured.However,areversecapturecheckerboardhybridiza-tionmethodwasdeveloped.17Inthismodificationofthetraditionalmethod,PCRamplified16Sribosom-alRNAgenesofupto30knownbacterialspeciesarespottedontoblots.ThemembraneisthenhybridizedwithPCRamplified16SrRNAgenesfromunknownplaquesamples.Theprimersforthesetargetsarelabeledwithuniversalprobeswhicharedetectedbychemifluorescence.Thisreversecapturehybridiza-tionmethodallowsfor1,350hybridizationssimulta-neouslyon1membrane.17 A disadvantage of these slotblotmethodsisthattheyareratherlaborious,andnonhybridizationPCRmethodsarenowmorecommonlyused.
-
258 The Journal of Dental Hygiene Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall 2011
16S rrna gene Sequencing
The16SribosomalRNAgeneishighlyconservedandcanbeused in the formationofphylogenetictrees or genetic relationships.18,19 This discovery,alongwith the advent of PCR techniques, has al-lowedtheanalysisoforalbiofilmsonageneticlevel.16SRNAispresentinalmostallbacterialspecies,withuniquesequencedifferencesallowingdiscrimi-nation between species.20 Amplification methods,suchas16SrRNAsequencing,haveeliminatedtherequirement for culture based techniques, allow-ingtheidentificationofunculturablespecies.Iden-tification of the species present is determined bycomparing the 16S rRNA sequence derived fromtheunknown sample to databases of known spe-cies.Figure1summarizestheprocessof16SrRNAsequencing.
There is some disagreement on the similaritythresholdnecessarytoverifyaspecies.20 A reason-ablecriterionforgenusidentificationisa97%simi-larity score toa knowndatabase sequence,while99%similaritywasdeterminedsufficienttoidentifyatthespecieslevel.21Alimitationofthismethodislowresolutionindistinguishingbetweenbacteriaat
thespecieslevel.Speciesmayshareidentical16SrRNAsequencesorthedifferencesbetweenrelatedspeciesmaybeverysmall(lessthan0.5%).20 De-spite these limitations, 16S rRNA sequencing hasyielded awealth of new information about dentalbiofilms.16S rRNAanalysishasshown that thereareover300bacterial speciespresent in theoralcavitythatwerenotinitiallyidentifiedbytypicalcul-turingmethods.22,23Furthermore,itwasfoundthattherearedifferencesinbacterialflorapresentintheoral cavity of individualswith immunosuppressivediseasessuchasHIV.24Atotalofover700bacterialspecieshavebeenidentifiedintheoralcavity,manyofwhicharespecifictoaparticularoralsurface.25
Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis
Denaturinggradientgel electrophoresis (DGGE)is a PCR and electrophoresisbased approach foranalysisofmicrobialcommunities.Variousmarkergenes,including16SrRNA,areamplifiedusingPCRandthenanalyzedonadenaturinggel.Abandingpatterndevelopsbasedonthedenaturationcharac-teristics determined by the sequence compositionof each amplifiedDNA. Eachbandobservedon aDGGEgeltheoreticallyrepresentsadifferentbacte-
MolecularMethod Pros Cons References
CheckerboardDNADNAHybridization
SimultaneousprofilingofmultiplespeciesLargenumberofplaquesamplescanbeprocessedsimultaneously
Traditionalmethodslimitedtoculturablespeciesof bacteriaLabor intensive
1017,37
16SrRNAGeneSe-quencing
HighthroughputIdentifiesunculturablespecies
LowresolutionatspecieslevelNostandardizedthresholdfordistinguishingnewspecies
1820
DGGE EachbandpatternrepresentsdifferentbacterialpopulationShowsrelativeabundanceofeachspeciescollected
DifficultymaintainingreproducibleresultsMultiplespeciessequencesmaycomigrate
26,27,30
TRFLP Quickdetectionofgeneticdiversity
HighcomputationalpowerneededNovelsoftwareanddatabase required
3133
DHPLC Detectpointmutations InitsinfancystageswithassessmentofdentalbiofilmsFairlynewtechnology,needsmoreoptimization
3638
Pyrosequencing RapidresultsIdentifymicrobesandde-termineantibioticresistancegenotype
Cannotsequencefulllength16SrRNAgene
3941
TableI:Summaryofmoleculartechniquesfordentalbiofilmanalysis
-
Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall 2011 The Journal of Dental Hygiene 259
rial populationwithin a community.26 Thus,DGGEbandpatternscanillustratethecomplexityanddi-versityofabiofilmsample,andindividualbandscanbe subsequently excisedand sequenced todeter-minespecies identity.Figure2showsaschematicexampleofaDGGEgel.DGGEhasbeenappliedintheanalysisoforalmicrobialcommunities incon-ditionssuchasperiodontitisandseverechildhoodcaries.2729 A limitation of DGGE is that sequencedifferences greater than 1 base pair may fail toseparate on a denaturing gel because of similari-tiesinnucleotideproportionsthatresultinidenticaldenaturing characteristics of 2 different sequences. Therefore,excisionandsequencingisnecessarytoconfirmtheidentificationofspeciespresentwithinan individual band.30
terminal restriction fragmentlength Polymorphism
Terminal restriction fragment length polymor-phism (TRFLP) is another PCRbased techniquethat can be applied to the study of oral biofilms.Thistechniqueoriginatedfromthestudyofbacterialdiversity inenvironmental samples,andwas laterused for the analysis of oral microbial communi-ties.3134TRFLP issimilar toDGGE in thatcertaingenemarkers,including16SrRNA,areamplifiedbyPCRusinggenespecificprimerslabeledwithafluo-rescentprobe.Theamplifiedproductsarethendi-gestedwithrestrictionendonucleases,andthefrag-ments are separated by capillary electrophoresis.Thefragmentswiththeattachedfluorescentprobesaredetectedbytheinstrumentandanalyzedusingfragmentanalysissoftware.Whenthesamplesareanalyzed by gel electrophoresis, specific bandingpatternscanbeassessedwhichrepresentcomplexmicrobialcommunities.35 This technology has been usedtoassessdifferentmicrobialprofilesinhumansaliva,changesinmicrobialcommunitiesintheoralcavity after treatment and bacteria present in in-fected root canals.3234 The applications of TRFLParepromising,butthetechniqueisstillinitsinfancystages.TRFLPrequiresexpensiveinstrumentation,highcomputationalpowerandverylargedatabasestocomparethegeneticsequences.11
Emerging technologies
Anumberofrecentlydevelopedtechniqueshavebeenimplementedformicrobial identification,andthese methods show potential for future applica-tionsinthestudyoforalbiofilms.Denaturinghighperformance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) is aPCRbasedmethodwhichisfollowedbyseparationbasedonpartialdenaturationoftheamplifiedDNA.This technique can be used to detect DNA sequence changes, such as point mutations.36 DHPLC has
Figure1:16SrRNAGeneSequencingFlowchart
Thisfigureshowsageneralschematicoftheprocessof16SrRNAsequencing.DNAisfirstpurifiedfromthebiofilmsampleorbacterialisolate.The16SrRNAgeneisamplifiedfromthegenomicDNAusinggenespecificprimers.Eithertheentire16SrRNAgeneorasmallerhypervariableregionofthegenemaybeamplified.ThePCRproductisthensequenced,andthesequenceiscomparedagainstadata-baseofknownbacterialspecies.Exactornearlyexact(>99%)sequencealignmentbetweenknownandunknownsequencescanidentifyamicrobeatthespecieslevel.Bacteriamayonlybeidentifiableatthegenuslevel(>97%sequenceidentity).
beenpreviouslyutilizedinotherareasofresearch,suchasintestinalmicrobiota,andhasmorerecentlybeenappliedforanalysisofdentalbiofilmsandbac-teria.37,38Techniquesusedinchronicwoundbiofilmanalysismayalsobecomeusefulfororalbiofilmre-searchanddiagnosis.Pyrosequencing,arapidse-quencingmethod that can simultaneously identifymicrobesanddetectantibioticresistance,hasbeenappliedforthedeterminationofbacterialdiversityin chronicwoundbiofilmssuchas indiabetic foot
-
260 The Journal of Dental Hygiene Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall 2011
ulcers, venous leg ulcers and pressure ulcers.3940 Recently, thepyrosequencingmethodwasappliedto the analysis of saliva and supragingival plaquesamples,anditwasestimatedthat19,000differentmicrobialspeciesarepresentinthemouth.41Stud-ieswhichutilizethesenextgenerationmethodsarerevealingthatoriginalapproximationsoforalmicro-bialdiversitywerehighlyunderestimated.
Themainstreamapplicationofmolecularmethodsin both research and clinical settings has allowedfora rapidexpansionofourunderstandingof theoralmicrobialenvironment.Asinotherfields,suchaschronicwoundcare,thefuturemanagementoforaldiseasewillbenefitfromadoptionofmolecularbiofilm analysis methods. While the identificationofspeciespresentwithinaplaquebiofilmisessen-tialforfocusedtreatment,theunderstandingoftheunified communication and adaptive changes thatoccurwithin themicrobial community as awholeisequallyimportant.Somefuturedirectionsshouldinclude the assessment of gene expression levelsintheoralbiofilm.Theanalysisofgeneexpressionwithinabiofilmcanhelpaidintheidentificationofvirulencefactorsthatmightmakethebiofilmmoreresistant to antibiotics or other treatment, similartostudiesperformedonmethicillinresistantS.au-reus.42MethodssuchasrealtimePCRormicroar-raycananalyzethegeneexpressionpatternsthatmaymake a particular biofilm population inclinedtocausedisease.Expressiondataderivedbysuchmethods can be applied to analyze oral biofilmsunderconditionssuchas inflammationor immunesuppression,orcanbeusedtoevaluatedentalbac-teriabehaviorbeforeandafterantibiotictreatment.This can provide insight into how the oral biofilmcommunicatesandbehavesasawholeunit.
Asmoleculartechniquesbecomemainstreamandmorewidelyavailableinclinicallaboratories,theca-pabilitytoobtainindividualpatientbiofilmprofilesisbecomingattainable.Byidentifyingthepathogenicbacteriainapatient,treatmentcanbepersonalizedto the infection. A recently launched clinical diagnos-ticlaboratory(OralDNALabs)nowoffersmoleculartesting todentalpractitioners for thediagnosisofperiodontaldisease,usingPCRbasedteststoiden-tify pathogenic oral bacteria.43 Such servicesmayhelpavoidthegeneralizeduseofantibioticsthatareineffective or encourage antibiotic resistance. The traditional empiricalmethod of prescribing antibi-otics in dentistry has been questioned because of unnecessaryorinappropriateuseofantibioticsthatcanleadtoantibioticresistantorganisms.44,45
Thereareanumberofobstaclespreventingthe
Discussion
immediatemarriageofdentistryandmoleculardi-agnostics.Rapidtreatmentandreliefforthepatientisaprimaryconcern for thedentalpractitioner.Apatientwith a critical oral infection shouldnot bedeniedtreatmentforthe48hoursormorethatisrequired for traditional microbiological tests, thusempiricaltreatmenthasbeentraditionallyutilizedintheabsenceofabetteroption.However,therapidnature of most molecular assays provides a vastimprovement over lengthy culture methods, withmanymoleculartechniquesprovidingidentificationof organisms in amatter of a few hours. Even aturnaroundtimeof24hoursforreliableidentifica-tionofpathogenicbacteriacanallowforcustomizedmodificationoftheinitialempiricalantibiotictreat-mentofveryillpatients,particularlyforrefractoryformsoforaldisease.Thereisunderuseofdiagnos-ticmicrobiologylaboratoriesbydentalpractitioners,
Figure2:SchematicofaDGGEGel
Variousmarkergenes,suchas16SrRNA,areampli-fiedbyPCRandanalyzedbydenaturingelectropho-resis.Thepolyacrylamidegelconsistsofagradientofdenaturant,typicallyureaandformamide.PCRprod-uctswhicharesimilaroridenticalinmolecularweightareseparatedbasedondifferingdenaturingcharacter-isticsdeterminedbytheuniquenucleotidesequence.DistinctbandsrepresentdifferentsequencesofDNAfromdifferentbacteriapresentinthesample.Forexample,lanesA,BandCrepresentknownbacterialsamples.Lanes1and2arebiofilmsamplesofun-knownbacterialcomposition.Bandsthatmigratesimi-larlyintheunknownlanesarecomparedtotheknownbands.Thebiofilmsampleinlane1includesMicrobeAandMicrobeC,whilethesampleinlane2includesMicrobeA,MicrobeBandanunknownspecies.Theunknownband,indicatedwithanarrow,canbeex-cisedfromthegelandsequencedforidentification.
-
Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall2011 TheJournalofDentalHygiene 261
whichmaybemitigatedbyagreaterawarenessoftheservicesprovidedbysuchlaboratories.44
Otherconsiderations for implementationofmo-leculardiagnosticsindentalpracticearethatofprac-ticality and cost.46Someofthetechniquesdiscussedabovearecurrentlycostprohibitiveforroutineusein the diagnosis of oral infection. The reimburse-mentofmolecularassaysbythirdpartypayersisalsocomplicatedby lackingorambiguousCurrentProcedural Terminology codes for somemoleculartests.However,molecularassaysarerapidlybecom-inghigherthroughputandmorestandardized,andsomemolecular testsarekitbasedand relativelyinexpensive.Nonetheless,whilemoleculardiagnos-ticsarequicklybecomingafeasibleapproach,labo-ratorydiagnosisoforaldiseasewilllikelyremainre-servedforpatientswithsevereperiodontaldiseaseorthosewhohavebeenunresponsivetotraditionaltreatment.Althoughmoleculardiagnosticswillnottake the place of the primary clinicalmethods ofpreventionanddebridement,itdoesofferabenefi-cialcomplementtothepracticeofdentalhygiene.
ConclusionUnderstanding the complex interactions be-
tweenbacteriathatoccurwithinanoralbiofilmwillprovideinsightnecessaryforimprovingdiagnosis,treatment andprevention of periodontal disease.Dentalpractitionersshouldbeawareofemergingdiagnostictechniquesandshouldstrivetoworkinconcertwithresearcherstoharnessnewtechnolo-giesforimprovingbiofilmmanagement.Moleculardiagnosticsofdentalbiofilmswillallow for rapid,focused and personalized treatment, enhancingthetraditionalmethodsusedbydentalhygieniststocontrolandpreventperiodontaldisease.
Sarah Hiyari, MS, is currently a PhD student in Oral Biology at the University of California Los Angeles, School of Dentistry. Katie Bennett, PhD, is an assistant professor in the Molecular Pathology and Clinical Laboratory Science programs at the Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, School of Allied Health, in Lubbock, Texas.
-
262 The Journal of Dental Hygiene Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall 2011
GestH.ThediscoveryofmicroorganismsbyRob-1. ert Hooke and Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, fel-lowsoftheRoyalSociety.Notes Rec R Soc Lond. 2004;58(2):187201.
Miller WD. The microorganisms of the human2. mouth.Am J Med Sci.1891;101(2):159.
AasJA,PasterBJ,StokesLN,OlsenI,DewhirstFE.3. Definingthenormalbacterialfloraoftheoralcavity.J Clin Microbiol.2005;43(11):57215732.
MarshPD.Dentalplaqueasamicrobialbiofilm.4. Caries Res.2004;38(3):204211.
MarshPD.Dentalplaqueasabiofilmandamicrobi-5. alcommunityimplicationsforhealthanddisease.BMC Oral Health.2006;6(Suppl1):S14.
tenCateJM.Biofilms,anewapproachtothemicro-6.biologyofdentalplaque.Odontology.2006;94(1):19.
LiX,KolltveitKM,TronstadL,OlsenI.Systemicdis-7.eases caused by oral infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13(4):547558.
AkutsuY,MatsubaraH,ShutoK,etal.Preoperative8. dentalbrushingcanreducetheriskofpostoperativepneumoniainesophagealcancerpatients.Surgery. 2010;147(4):497502.
StaleyJT,KonopkaA.Measurementof insituac-9. tivities of nonphotosynthetic microorganisms inaquatic and terrestrial habitats. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1985;39:321346.
SocranskySS,SmithC,MartinL,PasterBJ,Dewhirst10. FE,LevinAE.CheckerboardDNADNAhybridiza-tion. Biotechniques.1994;17(4):788792.
KuramitsuHK,HeX,LuxR,AndersonMH,ShiW.In-11. terspeciesinteractionswithinoralmicrobialcommu-nities. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev.2007;71(4):65370.
Mager DL, XimenezFyvie LA, Haffajee AD,12. Socransky SS. Distribution of selected bacterialspecies on intraoral surfaces. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30(7):644654.
doNascimentoC,BarbosaRE,IssaJP,WatanabeE,13. ItoIY,deAlbuquerqueJuniorRF.UseofcheckerboardDNADNAhybridizationtoevaluatetheinternalcon-taminationofdentalimplantsandcomparisonofbac-terialleakagewithcastorpremachinedabutments.Clin Oral Implants Res.2009;20(6):571577.
Papapanou PN, Baelum V, Luan WM, et al.14. SubgingivalmicrobiotainadultChinese:prev-alenceandrelationtoperiodontaldiseasepro-gression. J Periodontol.1997;68(7):651666.
Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Smith C, et al.15. Use of checkerboard DNADNA hybridizationto study complexmicrobial ecosystems.Oral Microbiol Immunol.2004;19(6):352362.
HaffajeeAD,CuginiMA,TannerA,etal.Sub-16.gingivalmicrobiotainhealthy,wellmaintainedelderandperiodontitissubjects.J Clin Periodontol.1998;25(5):346353.
PasterBJ,BartoszykIM,DewhirstFE.Identi-17.ficationoforalstreptococciusingPCRbased,reversecapture, checkerboard hybridization.Methods Cell Sci.1998;20(1):223231.
FoxGE,StackebrandtE,HespellRB,etal.18. Science.1980;209(4455):457463.
WoeseCR.Bacterialevolution.19. Microbiol Rev. 1987;51(2):221271.
JandaJM,AbbottSL.16SrRNAgenesequenc-20. ingforbacterialidentificationinthediagnosticlaboratory: pluses, perils, and pitfalls. J Clin Microbiol.2007;45(9):27612764.
DrancourtM, Bollet C, Carlioz A,Martelin R,21. Gayral JP, Raoult D. 16S ribosomal DNA se-quence analysis of a large collection of envi-ronmentalandclinicalunidentifiablebacterialisolates. J Clin Microbiol.2000;38(10):36233630.
Kroes I, Lepp PW, Relman DA. Bacterial di-22. versitywithinthehumansubgingivalcrevice.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.1999;96(25):1454714552.
PasterBJ,BochesSK,GalvinJL,etal.Bacte-23. rial diversity in human subgingival plaque. J Bacteriol.2001;183(12):37703783.
PasterBJ,RussellMK,AlpagotT,etal.Bacteri-24. aldiversityinnecrotizingulcerativeperiodon-titisinHIVpositivesubjects.Ann Periodontol. 2002;7(1):816.
PasterBJ,Olsen I,Aas JA,Dewhirst FE.The25. breadth of bacterial diversity in the humanperiodontalpocketandotheroralsites.Periodontol 2000.2006;42:8087.
references
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0066-4227(1985)39L.321[aid=5261807]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0066-4227(1985)39L.321[aid=5261807]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=1381-5741(1998)20:1L.223[aid=9739821]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0303-6979(1998)25:5L.346[aid=9739822]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0303-6979(1998)25:5L.346[aid=9739822]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0902-0055(2004)19:6L.352[aid=9739823]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0902-0055(2004)19:6L.352[aid=9739823]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0022-3492(1997)68:7L.651[aid=9739824]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0905-7161(2009)20:6L.571[aid=9739825]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0303-6979(2003)30:7L.644[aid=9739826]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0303-6979(2003)30:7L.644[aid=9739826]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=0736-6205(1994)17:4L.788[aid=9739828]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=1618-1247(2006)94:1L.1[aid=9739831]http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=1618-1247(2006)94:1L.1[aid=9739831]
-
Vol. 85 No. 4 Fall2011 TheJournalofDentalHygiene 263
FischerSG,LermanLS.DNAfragmentsdifferingby26.singlebasepairsubstitutionsareseparatedinde-naturinggradientgels:correspondencewithmeltingtheory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.1983;80(6):15791583.
FujimotoC,MaedaH,KokeguchiS,etal.Application27.ofdenaturinggradientgelelectrophoresis(DGGE)totheanalysisofmicrobialcommunitiesofsubgingivalplaque.J Periodontal Res.2003;38(4):440445.
ZijngeV,HarmsenHJ,KleinfelderJW,vanderRest28. ME,DegenerJE,WellingGW.Denaturinggradientgelelectrophoresisanalysistostudybacterialcom-munitystructureinpocketsofperiodontitispatients.Oral Microbiol Immunol.2003;18(1):5965.
LiY,GeY,SaxenaD,CaufieldPW.Geneticprofiling29. oftheoralmicrobiotaassociatedwithsevereearlychildhood caries. J Clin Microbiol.2007;45(1):8187.
JacksonCR,RodenEE,ChurchillPF.Denaturinggra-30. dient gel electrophoresis can fail to separate 16SrDNAfragmentswithmultiplebasedifferences.Molecular Biology Today.2000;1(2):4951.
LiuWT,MarshTL,ChengH,ForneyLJ.Character-31. izationofmicrobialdiversitybydeterminingtermi-nal restriction fragment length polymorphisms ofgenesencoding16SrRNA.Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63(11):45164522.
SakamotoM,TakeuchiY,UmedaM,IshikawaI,Ben-32. noY.ApplicationofterminalRFLPanalysistochar-acterizeoralbacterialflorainsalivaofhealthysub-jectsandpatientswithperiodontitis.J Med Microbiol. 2003;52(Pt1):7989.
HommezGM,VerhelstR,ClaeysG,Vaneechoutte33. M,DeMoorRJ. Investigationof theeffect of thecoronal restoration quality on the composition oftherootcanalmicroflorainteethwithapicalperio-dontitisbymeansofTRFLPanalysis.Int Endod J. 2004;37(12):819827.
SakamotoM,HuangY,OhnishiM,UmedaM,Ishika-34. wa I, BennoY.Changes in oralmicrobial profilesafterperiodontaltreatmentasdeterminedbymo-lecularanalysisof16SrRNAgenes.J Med Microbiol. 2004;53(Pt6):563571.
SchtteUM,AbdoZ,BentSJ,etal.Advancesinthe35. use of terminal restriction fragment length poly-morphism(TRFLP)analysisof16SrRNAgenestocharacterizemicrobialcommunities.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol.2008;80(3):365380.
HoogendoornB,NortonN,KirovG,etal.Cheap,36.accurateandrapidallelefrequencyestimationofsingle nucleotide polymorphisms by primer ex-tension andDHPLC inDNA pools.Hum Genet. 2000;107(5):488493.
GoldenbergO,HerrmannS,AdamT,etal.Use37.of denaturing highperformance liquid chro-matography for rapid detection and identifica-tionof sevenCandidaspecies. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(12):59125915.
JacintoRC,GomesBP,DesaiM, RajendramD,38. ShahHN.Bacterialexaminationofendodonticin-fectionsbyclonalanalysisinconcertwithdena-turinghighperformanceliquidchromatography.Oral Microbiol Immunol.2007;22(6):403410.
Petrosino JF, Highlander S, Luna RA, Gibbs39. RA, Versalovic J. Metagenomic pyrosequenc-ing and microbial identification. Clin Chem. 2009;55(5):856866.
DowdSE,SunY,SecorPR,etal.Surveyofbac-40. terialdiversity inchronicwoundsusingpyrose-quencing,DGGE,andfullribosomeshotgunse-quencing. BMC Microbiol.2008;8:43.
KeijserBJ,ZauraE,HuseSM,etal.Pyrosequenc-41. ing analysis of the oral microflora of healthyadults. J Dent Res.2008;87(11):10161020.
PlataK,RosatoAE,WegrzynG.Staphylococcus42. aureusasaninfectiousagent:overviewofbio-chemistryandmoleculargeneticsofitspathoge-nicity. Acta Biochim Pol.2009;56(4):597612.
Innovations in Salivary Diagnostics. OralDNA43. Labs[Internet].2010[cited2010April4].Avail-ablefrom:http://www.oraldna.com/periodontaltesting.html
SweeneyLC,DaveJ,ChambersPA,HeritageJ.44. Antibiotic resistance ingeneraldentalpracticeacauseforconcern?J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;53(4):567576.
GoodchildJH,DonaldsonM.Appropriateantibi-45. oticprescribingforthegeneraldentist.Gen Dent. 2009;57(6):626634.
PfallerMA.Molecular approaches todiagnosing46.and managing infectious diseases: practicalityand costs. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(2):312318.
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/external-references?article=1080-6