Rev. Jones Was CIA Agent S 't Alleges • SAN FRANCISCO A.1141—Survivors of the Peoples Temple tragedy and relatives of the dead followers of the Rev. Jim Jones sued the federal government Wed-nesday, claiming it conspired in the deaths of more than 900 cult members.

The suit for personal injury and vinlation of crvil rights charges that former Secretary of State: Cyrus'. Vance and former CIA Director Stanfield Turner‘parti-cmated in a conspiracy with Jones to control temple members who held socialist beliefs. •1,

The suit alleges that Jones was an "employee. ser-vant. agent or operative" of the CIA from 1963 until his death along with 912 other temple members in a mass murder-suicide in Guyana. •

Tile suit charges that the CIA knesi "that they had commissioned Jarnes"Warren Jones to embark upon a plan to control and to ultimately massacre members of the Peoples Temple."

By- Erica Goad. A group of Jonestown

survivors and the parents of a 19-year-old Guyana victim filed a $63.9 million Jitillmlast_thefederal_ Layexontezayssteasuc.. charging that People's Temple leader Jim Jones was a CIA agent.

The suit, filed in U.S. Dis-trict Court, also accuses U.S. government agencies and offi-cials of conspiring with Jones in a macabre plot to control politi-cal dissidence. Government offi-cials knew about Jones' plans for the mass murder-suicide of his followers as early as seven

months before the November 1878 tragedy, the suit charges.

"I want some disclosure, I want some changes." said_Robert Bockelman, the attorr i_owho sled the7SZt—Fo-r—the group.

"Jonestown' occurred, and at thousand people died and noth-,-- ing changed in our socielY-7

The seven plaintiffs seek $50 million in compensation for vio-lations of their civil rights and another 813.4 million in personal injury damages,

From 1963 until November 18, 1978, the suit alleges, "James Warren Jones was an employee., servant, agent, or operative of

the ... Central Intelligence Agency."

The suit also charges that former Secretary of State Cyrus Vance and former CIA director Stanfield Turner took part in a conspiracy to "enhance the eco-nomic and political powers of James Warren Jones," in order to gain control over "persons tending toward a socialist per-spective."

Vesta Turner, the U.S. Stag Deoanti ment, the U.S. De partment of Justice, the US. Customs Service, the House of Representatives and several oth-er past and present government officials are named as defend-

Attorney Bockelman, con-ceding that the evidence he has collected against the govern-ment is mostly circumstantial. said he hopes the suit will bring to light prtvinuslv hidden in-formation about the eovern: rnent'scomaigitv with-Anni.t

Monica Baghy, who was wounded in the ambush at the Port Kaltuma airstrip that left Sp Mateo Congressman Leo Ryan and four others dead, claims in the suit that she was "falsely imprisoned for three months in Jonestown," and that she was "the victim of fraud and deceit..."

Etagby was a witness In the recent trial of Larry Layton on charges of conspiring to murder Ryan.

Jonestown Survivors Sue

Jones Called CI Agent

an ,raririsro filirsairit 7 Thurs., October 15, 198

ants in the action.

You can obtain a copy of the actual lawsuit by sending $1.00 to:

AFRO-LEGACY RESEARCH AND PRODUCTIONS

P. O. BOX 3395 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93105

--TweravniemNatol.pmr...

Who's Behind John Lennon's Assassination?

By Mury Glass

The recent assasination of world-renown musician John Lennon by so-called "lone nut" Mark David Chapman already has many suspicious overtones to it. The first thing anyone notices about the assassination is that Chapman is already being depicted in the same vein as other infamous alleged assassins of the last 20 years. Chapman has been labeled a "kook" a "wacko" and "deranged" by unnamed New York Police Department (NYPD) officials. He also supposedly came to New York alone (i.e. "no conspiracy") with money that he borrowed (i.e. wasn't financed — "no conspiracy") from his friends in Hawaii.

This description is strikingly familiar to other "lone nut" assassins such as Lee Harvey Oswald.

Sirhan Sirhan. James Earl Ray. Marcus Chenault (killer of Martin Luther King. Jr.'s mother), and King Faisal's "deranged" nephew. In each of these cases. the accused was very quickly labeled by both

-officials and the media as being "deranged" and "lone nuts". Then there is the constant repetition (again) that this was a "senseless act of violence" ( i.e. "no conspiracy").

One of the procedures that any criminal learns in deciding upon a modus operandi (method of operation) for his/their crimes is that once they find a successful technique, to use it again and again and again, until it is no longer successful. And by contrast, any detective or investigator who attempts to solve a crime is trained to look for patterns and similarities. The obvious similarities in this case should speak for themselves.

A look at what is known to date about Lennon's assassination is as follows:

1) After shooting five shots (which officials say caused seven wounds) into Lennon, Chapman stood over Lennon with a dazed took, not even attempting any type of escape.

2) Though only in town for two weeks, police claim that they knew who Chapman was. It is based on this so-called knowledge of Chapman that police have labeled him a "kook" and a "wacko".

3) Police, though not able to stop Chapman from shooting Lennon, were able to show up "quick enough" to rush Lennon to the hospital. Did they perform mouth to mouth resuscitation or any other medical techniques to try to save Lennon's life?

4) As of December 10th. police state that there still is "no motive" for the shotting. The media, as usual is simply broadcasting whatever the police say, instead of investigating for themselves.

5) On December 10th. it was reported that the last thing Chapman remembers was being in Hawaii! (more on this in a moment)

In 1958. a novel was written entitled "The Manchurian Candidate". The book was about hypno-programming subjects to commit political assassinations by a command or cue. Though

written as fiction. evidence exists to show that such techniques actually exist today, and have existed for some time. "Operation Mind Control" by Walter H. Bowart, documents CIA drug and hypnosis experiments used to alter people's behavior through mind control techniques. Boward documents case after case of CIA/military experiments on people who were hypno-programmed to perform tasks the subjects could not even remember performing after doing them! The book also explores the very real possibility that Oswald, Sirhan, and James Earl Ray were all hypno-programmed patsies to be in the "right" place at the "wrong" time. Some of the chapter titles of this book worth reading are: "Another Hypno-Patsy", "The 'Lone Nuts–, "Confession by Autometic Writing" and "The Patriotic Assassin". (Published in 1978 by Dell Publishing Company; Address — 1 Dag Hammarskjold Plaza. NY NY 10017. This book should be read by everyone who wants to fully understand how real the hypno-programming approach to assassinating people really is.)

Chapman's standing over Lennon in a daze and the blank spots in his very recent memory are very-similar to the actions of Sirhan Sirhan after he supposedly killed Robert Kennedy. Bowart cites evidence to prove that Sirhan was nothing more than a hypno-programmed patsy. Chapman WM then held after his arrest by NYPD officials for close to 24 hours, without much explanation about anything to the public. Did they interrogate him? Are their notes of the interrogation available. or have they been destroyed (as was the case with Oswald)? Has Chapman now been re-hypnotized and re-programmed? For one flaw (and maybe the only flaw) that Bowart exposes about the hypno-programming approach is that the only way the subject can remember his acts is when he is put under hypnosis. It is in this state that the subject's subconscious mind will reveal details that the conscious mind has been hypnotized to forget!

Of course the intricate knowledge of this technique and the technology to perform it is only available to the most sophisticated and covert elements of our society.

Why would anyone want to have John Lennon killed? After all, he was "only" a musician who hadn't even cut any records until very recently. The answer to this may be found in the context in which his killing occurred, after remembering who John Lennon was. John Lennon was a member of the most famous group (the Beatles) of our time. As such, he and the group had a great influence over millions of young people around the world. His influence continued after the Beatles spl it up and he went out on his own. During the height of the Viet Nam war, the Beatles took a stand for world peace — "give peace a chance". As we enter the 1980's, it looks as if the U.S. is itching to get into another war anywhere to help bolster the sagging economy, and to stop all those countries from becoming liberated.

With this being the case, world-recognized "peacenik" John Lennon. already on the rise again in influence with his newly-released album. can be viewed as an obstacle to any impending (and then ongoing) war plan the U.S. has.

We must remember that we are all little subjects who beg the officials above for morsels of information as to the facts behind Lennon's assassination. Experience and common sense should have taught us by now that we are only being told what they want us to know, when they decide we should know it (i.e. "no motive yet").

There will of course. be attempts by the same sophisticated covert elements to discredit this information and the people associated with it. That is to be expected from 1984 Orwellian types who, in their attempts to control history. concede only the obvious (i.e. finally "oncedinc" the JFK assassination involved more than one person, so there must have been two "lone nuts" present in Dealey Plaza!).

Someone is sure to attack these points by claiming that the aforementioned can never be proven in a court of law. The rest of the reasoning to this angle is that if it cannot be proven in a court of law, then it

- did not happen. Studies have shown the hardest cases to prove under the "beyond a reasonable doubt" requirement are conspiracy cases. This is the chief reason why New Orleans businessman Clay Shaw was acquitted for conspiring to assassinate President Kennedy. Shaw had been indicted by New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison (now a judge) for conspiracy in the JFK

assassination. (It was discovered much later that Shaw was in fact a CIA contact. and that the CIA conspired to covertly obstruct Garrison's prosecution of Shaw. See Victor Marchetti's "The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence" and "A Heritage of Stone" by Jim Garrison, which oddly enough is no longer being printed, but should be available in most libraries.)

Lennon's assassination must also be viewed as a "trial run" for future assassinations of musicians. The social and political impact of music, which cuts across all geographical, social and racial barriers. cannot be overlooked. Whether or not you personally liked John Lennon or the Beatles, the grave implication of his assassination must be realized. Consider a scenario in which others are assassinated, and Lennon's assassination is cited as the incident which caoscf, other "lone nuts" to follow his lead. Who would be next? Stevie Wonder? Bob Marley? Gil Scott-Heron?

The mine of Mark David Chapman cannot be underestimated. In closing, consider what Walter Bowart wrote about the significance and value of the framing of Lee Harvey Oswald as a "lone nut": labelling Oswald as such provided the rationale and climate for acceptance by the public of this same cover story for the two other major political assassinations of the 1960's of Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King. And by failing to uncover and expose this explanation in time. gave the green light to the cryptocracy to proceed with these assassinations. Let's hope we don't make the same mistake again.

Copyright ID December 11. 1980 by Mury Glass. Additional copies of this article may be obtained by sending $.75 to the author at P.O. Box 3385. Santa Barbara, CA 93105.

,...■•■

■■

••d

•

,?1292 rIs 1/ 3p3 t 11W22 5;8 i2! i;g111;if t4.12.1n4 Eg-5

2= U

27V lal

1.:'2

E9.0iR 6E1

;§sit5 iatlo it

211 ei

4,

2. e t;: ; 41"i

s. ?II ii;RE=0s 7 i.13= E. .i. 216! 0.-

g194 § 11 i' a. 2

.,.7?-S 3!! 1„

E E-C2i1 .! C'-

c.!

WE 83!

i

!• - a 3E ?E L.- ;1.gsl. . !

..,s. 4,..t

at- g g2c

c .!.s2 E

p g.=e7

"1'2=1 lid ;1 tac ' 0052'5'

■ . 22, g!!-.!110 AZaCtt

eTa-qt gl.-stg7122

1 1.3. -

--i.90 .9 z.p.,% g asi-;'4 IA! 311 02pg-A "f5

at. -. ;:011045

-- - 0z-g AL it-.• -.•8.3I-li 3- ..,"1 ..5-

ia;

.s E,c23.12 lfiV.:na-.

1

24E1.

4 iye

y

.2',

e,,,;. gya -t. i.agv;4.9_ s.i iik,..0 , Lms“:22.0-

I 6 =" ..g g 3

;1

2E1- - EE10

023 2

108 0

.44,0 i

.aid,e1 801,!5;1.41

01.

',11 : A

.i. E. .33 ..... X at 2fiEE,- ctii 6C

i

i

li§21 lais it til : :21M? .i '

2 - "

= P i?

ktc!2 "'4 !

i liA

■ , “lli

le tli;i410406.0

3q 11117"

°

.0. !i31 r.

.1501!1=-P 7ii it!lielfTl110

1-ft!=r;23

IIIIP

211

: a

`am I

,...E.:i4 3qi Pi =E. “.9. - .4 °

.

51 , :-Igtii0V;t0,s.gs! i:! ip101 ii.! "Eljg00;0 0, 77T7

D16-

8...c. asmr- .. :,...9. >I. . _

i.62Gyg...1,...

ImgE J 0

kii BiaeiK

E f2, oftgagu.b.5. No 011RstA-irrf

,,te22,20.1? IZEOtsi.-3

i - e8

.'' E.

OLE:int6P g9t.k121

111

1. .e?!Ti. It8aigt1=2:2,1211

5i'"6-:..' .:21S'FAZ

.1 1

3 '1' Ei''

=2 a ? =i2' ..E

.S".2V" ,- EZ= ,.t.1

-.st° ',,..

al3i.lits.....6-,2 ,13.,201, vP1.:12.2

.0.s"13. .!!st si;v=aa.Eg Eg2-2eia

22E=i

7Ei-

1° cP.alOs

L' i 01.'4

=

511;3 .11;2

22 too0a-t15410

dgo,t- A.it

EngyoR1E ET.L2...0,„,Z.s

40ti'h' t ?qtpf-2V F02.ril'if812E

lingicppliti:ii:82.0!/;WpW142

61gb li 12d

="1-1 ,

E0W1

5 :'W;1;i: 1.41'062ig

a l.10 , ilil

in'h

Eatifdrilita

2 1,c1 :11;fig!gai IJOA10:160!giitt7tmligigsg.T1.!;.0ii.W1114

11!

Z.Xg 2.q i&1 °iEe.:2

gzaF liT z

kl: ■ -w;?4„,iv;gs.11„1.1

11E1, 0i9 .0.:

Ipi

,26.6 i

;;So'Ves-1.= I 3 !‘l'i ..12; , ..zi4iEffi?!!.11-.25E12?0?i i,.-!

!1;.i.i4,

",

31- i

--E

2.- i1:02.4-111Alw . - 111B,E ;31-a.-:‘.E.22:d11ji4=-4.-60?:;irlOt -.,-

-z."s,1-

digs li lkilsiei cg,-.A- .&=5,Fier“

1:igSf-0.i:ivoi,ng=Wot

Eli..Nif 0.2i1?2

gc

‘Ii8. & .40.

-it-

Eilk ii 5t:§-1 12g 1-

2ti—atriE:50 5a: 51.Zgtis-fitgiriligtur0

I'L

-Opp. Sanar 10 San Wry Caoldaran-

56.10, Won, C.010.81a • rr., S.ttato Sotwt Commal. On In Hlllp.nw Room G-3ce 0-01.an Sena. On K. Eloncl.ng Yruningion. P.C.2115112

Dow Sons... Csoldwaler

1.0. 0104.0 w *117009.0 S Ta• prop.. long ay. 000 ISPPor.n0y M. ornal st0 mu it clan.p in0 a so ..1..P... •Ilan 1N 91091111 1.0.10111 Pon. I Wilson Iv aco. laohncly Wool n how Wm nonce. nom Cohn,. MOM ro al 10 honia.a.C.46,6 Ir. nay CO 0011011! . Warta 7 Enc. au! no AMMO. inialito.C. Community si was Imo.17 101 no TO onionnia0 0. program yon anal ahoy b Ossagnne.

W.i.g.rne a1 n. 1.1 *V 11101 TY. monalon 10ln1.... wont a. run... pole... Tivls gen0 ann... altason tan 1r4 0000 one ono co co corricannymay. aaLl open in....116.•

I. aPng Dom IM tiso 911.710nlan0 to enc. alio 00.11.01.01 AO*

LAC 01110 .01.10 ani cacaos.. mo, 0.0 tow... I., m9n1 inaan maN . ant 10.10M1 0100 OnITI .10 10.0

In W.- arm. ol .1011. 11000 Sat onnilon 101.E 14 b MlnarnO 1010 .00 ammo.a mum, 01 p.n. ye

con.. Si. P. S1004r ponnt r owiri 0.101 rw Tnr an•.y. nae• moo =ma Mad. Satiety la son Impels 'we no only can coand harna. Woo. l. 17.11 • Sktnno ••■• 11001101 • no IN cr Mn.rr.nay.10

II Th. conon.spolmoin d u,...nw*c.n wag.. son..., ra 1000 nub, WIC Cc* sccall0n0 10 MN 0* Yon T.•••

$4,••1.• • WY ...a nor.. I. 104. 1.101.0=Ca 00111/11.001 111.0. enc Inu.a1 ma 1103111 01.6.6 • noon. cannon Tne. aracian mown kraaamoy homy 1111.16 15.51 116.1 ono Osnapplumg • IA WV. Tar 0.050111011007 sam...bon ogierq.uong ivy,. 01.110 err, lmppnanl 100014,.. ra11:111-; 6.,010110.00.00..•00...1.110 that 5 0111.011 la non 106.014.1. an unarm.. ow al ma Won worn can ea

1.14Ca1000 I 11 11% =nat. =PM nnp 0.0.60.10 109011 nano an.a.00 C1117 tivoyan in P11n1 moy pan Tha 4 nun. 11 is i So mo lon WA,. Was cia and non...

a a a nare pain A iargo anon moan.. ono.. ioo laroan amain. pay in' or .0.62.610n ny Unman. or% b.,. 0....aps . alannat. 0110,4411 at ra. tlanors. 111140001001 ot a pima sung morn.. Oran

al ComMana, nroitalon o. Ina ...no. Pn=pence MP.. M.A. 1400 plan roan to Wynn X T. 90001001019.1. antliann non to pray, 0, none offino/...an sta a1 r.1.01.1 .11110 11. 4.014.01Orra.a. agem co...o .yas.1700714p. C. Waal 1..0.1104,10 counlann.Ingen.i 1010 0117 10 *0.0 anuqn1 antl 4100 in VOW II .111 Connunati am 1110..1 Am.. torn. nr.c. 1.11-.,.R.0

Toe t4011011.14. Ontrenan PM 01 0711.11anny • MC. 1=1:11 11. Ionsnr. IY¢Wm WopPro a purpose 11. la .1.1

an. romp L011.11001.1.01:00.0*. ..12.01

T

▪

ronno 1.10 prop., atm.. 0000110 0711111 ••••1 • .9. 1••••■•• ,••• Pi. Mg n..sah Or 0, k 10:10.1In m.niPUlnlnn ano caw. 41 err ...ton.. non an so.i.n. go.uniman irearlaark .1104 ak 0.010, *1 0,10.11 npan vw0e von. O.. • a.m.! al an 0.14401=.117 arc .1.000. 'Siam Inc magi o tniort rllucaa.ln.m T. ptgo ram gyps 1011 00011.1 Inan O. snowy Dana.

notional,. ••• uncloyano rt • otronon111111, any90akaelNaall, 111. Osnioan, I more coomnc.• 01 can My no, lo

IP a. owl 1.0.011 Mar• 110:0 Oa =MC, ..10.1. 1 111.11 WILY arm. • oanon: program yan an a Wm La /111111 .1.001irrn locusail maw 11911*

009 ron • annul ana many yen. 7 Irani opirpir v. 197. • i•PCM.0 01.10- 1.1 0.11.0 • fob te

mud uparca 1.1111,Cnen Ina 0.0 onoranl On..0 Woo.. sony. COM ottna • rittaLlna itt.naultnn cow con nom Vial onto rOu Lan OW Nan

inn ....Own Inter wren 1..6.0 my on. a mvsel: Tun or so. mac tnop•.• 70.1.• are 4 ••••• r•Cru ,^ 1.1011 8 net. *no, T. Dam.. rs WIND count. 'In gracitc. -.mop n. MIL. • .110011011101: 1.10. 1./Cren. ...V C.* 4

▪

77 4.1.01In Inn 0.4. 011p010. Any.. Imo Amy.. an 61 loos lam. Into giontimmani laallate,

• [nn utwertnot conch.. n unttettn now, wor., owl ion go." Tn. Vann* Liatn. ....on nom Ir. ...OP.,. a PaW6

nonce- OW.... 1' rat agrumer anon tntnt,ntntt.t.t...ttnot.o to itn• pane. .n0 *a Marl. 1/. 0.0*.rn roma. nu •••,..• amp 0,0 4.111141.1? ...or.. mono..? on. non,. at lam 1. Lenin,. 0.• C00110.1. LaLkafity areMay 1,1 trot c 5.410

Y.t-to omnetantRato 1,14

.y Fo .no 0., g

0.i co mclanuais.My0.4.141pay•no-npnal.111.* coao'

L.11101110. 1 5.1S ComErnanan soya.. maw 60.06 dry ou. 16.7 11 den noiton oi Ty sperorrum non.. opm. mon.

al. ply Me 1.1 sno currant on. al 1. cOoanan *now - IN" nasal

▪

11 nttntrWt int.nn. ono .11tact Ire ottont ot•-oto 1,0[0,1....110,0a,nnniaa 'yap .mr

11..• 6C5l, OP Gunny me wrung. WM. .00 fn. 10.10.050 Ion 101.0 p01. OP ya■wkat,l, yluala)11. enanaa

pooram d [anent. on...on TN pbiYlyn .....4611 iago m p 717.1 00.11. 11001.11, 1,00..1

lonng our10y. cosa. • 10.10al1an7541 inomprna loon 1 aro OM101 wool... lacuIrlf 1. -1. 1.00.109 .00C1.0. .0 aim. so her" 1.7.10 pc*,... un. p.a. 4.011 1..10 4.0 1.1.1 00, 110./.07*m0s.001anac.11.00010.. 00n1110 0010..1 II Can no lo1*9010116 mon 119,11M4

T.ontsoon a. • WC. 1.11107 al my cont....id,. pre, a MO 9.16 .4011.1..? ▪ nor .in I ,.....41.••••■... 0.21 • c.niyannt 0 CO, View, cenuldwoa ua IIy 0...man0n d 1.0. arc*** r0falape El an. n 00.100.0,11 1.01.1.101/ 0.11100.0 00 00.111 .1111.1.11.1

T. span. nem lo yam lop. I . on an poem or. amen no. nun.. CM101110 RrOConon II a...14 • •Lrhol, It nano....non 1014 •unar Iral In 0n.w1114r1h.1 onc,01001 Fla nos In.. pro... mason aaaaMA ala aunt al [Kaaba Mal Ira 1Crag-1.11T .01010.1 mar co omen nn cmc.cony coma. 11 91000110 la Itanatag 9* Ca von ayst.rie n.

man Ion o..caz c.ar 1.1

a=

a Tn.... c.vul.;r a Comp...... Conmallos moor

nmp argapv.oIaq .......npcn.mehnmet• no. a•PaMra,

110.-Wy roptra. 4 .one. emu., A Syn pal a.011 .0.0.01016. PC ODD •no ma. 5411.0 M. 14• 70.. IC 110.111111

71 11.17 4 wk.'s.... ••• adar.allan n 00.0.11' 01.1111.10. 00101.11=1 Cann. =1... I Ip1r In. 404111111 no Moro 0. • 1.10 31 1 trin ndm an0 1100

al 1 may. anal I am Ina. Thas tae anry ugh. Ina MOw .1190.14111 mom *4 mon .10 •11 In •

V 1pnn011010.46. maa I: 1.00.1 .laved lo acknonolge w a001ma 0.4..0 nono.Ce "moron. are mai pow onC.0.1. 11 app./v.. an roars no. 1 . r0attalca.11} 100.0001 an, Oop

yen,a H.. sgano,T From Wo 0114.01 ago., a.m. -an .110-1r10 COMM, Intallopan. S.N.O. CJw0,a an0 Fogerasmorns LaVar0a,,n0 a., wed In• CI,. Inca. trans C4 oaf1111111.1040 Cl& 9.4.1*.

6 01.0 raapoono not Wood non., nconi men nannnao mlonry 1.....16oprrecoonrang /ma as asand L.non nogyy, nos

or 0100k ros • 40s10010, • ram in Ira inwpgan10 p.oe.. in • ...1.1.11....10 11. CIA CIO norm.. en

tont• 01/00. •nonno, wnn .1.11.mce ea 6..0 101 11 Tly commu*,...101 111.10ng 1.0*

Ira

▪

ni 1114 114.01 a an5.0'. 121 50020,17.0 111110N17 ealpkilynkant 012.711alla0 aharl conouna 'Opm, oa • ontna. apyrer

Tn. Moo. rlycno•hi• MI I. 100111., luf MAW. *11. Of CIA but 0ea may syn.. II*. orrn roll. CIA01001110,. 1101 can Lin,00.10.11. 011 II *au 117.0 Canaan 1.1 111..1olgomint Dna. 01,.. ci1 .....pgaiton ann. 01 lin 0•64... emu.. 110ap00110110 won, min you Iconic mo .........44.6.0nOior In onargosof 951 1.1:126JEa •no 1c. Len... Cony Oa warn. =Kn.

11.1 00010.1.0 %Oa eon' o, n S.I.A.anny Nora and a... 1.11 101.010 Cr, 'noon. In on Py.r. arad fn.. ma ma LP t•prn. non Mu

017 .07 Sypow01 10.101 moon so.C...cor. nom., 54..4-tnt

News & Review Thursd2y. August 13. 1981 19

• --

-7N

>w*N

iy: =7: _

IF,:

AFR

O-L

EG

AC

Y R

ESE

AR

CH

A

ND

PRO

DU

CT

ION

S P. 0. B

OX

3336 SA

NTA

BA

RB

AR

A, C

A 93106

SANTA :3 1

78

2

Mr. Harold Weisberg Route 12 Frederick, :Maryland