Joint SuperSonic Cruise Missile (JSSCM) ACTD · PDF fileJoint SuperSonic Cruise Missile...
Transcript of Joint SuperSonic Cruise Missile (JSSCM) ACTD · PDF fileJoint SuperSonic Cruise Missile...
Joint SuperSonic Cruise Missile(JSSCM)
ACTDBreakfast Club Brief
Capt James Hart N780C/DCapt Carl Reiber PMA 258S. Lyda NAVAIR 47HG00D
Slide 2UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
• Mission Need
•N88 Vision Initiated 1998
•ACTD Mission
• JSSCM Technology
• Proposed JSSCM ACTD
• Growth Missions
• Summary
Agenda (U)Agenda (U)
MPEG of N88 High Speed Strike Vision
Slide 3UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
ACTD Mission NeedUSFK HARTS/ CBW Sites
CINC CFC Pacific: “NK 240mm MRL posed a significant Psychological and political Threat to South Korea and the CFC”.
Documents:•MNS 01C011-CS00164-SX-00 Hard and Deeply buried Targets Defeat Capability•CINCPAC FY 01 Integrated Priority List (IPL) Preferred/Precision Munitions, Counterfire•CINCUSNAVEUR FY01 IPL Precision Strike Munitions, All Weather, High Precision, Stationary & Moving Targets
Notional
Special Weapons Facilities - 50
Air Bases - 67
C&C - 30
Provided by Federation of American Scientists website
Slide 4UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
#1 Standoff Weapon Concept for OSD Hard and Deeply Buried Targets (HDBTDC) AoAref: HDBTDC AOA Report and Appendices 30 Sept 2000 01A756-SB00229-SX-00
JSSCM Effectiveness
S UCCES S /COS T AVERAG
CONCEPT S UCCES S COS T AVERAG
GS S CM 89% 44 ,392 .8 0$ CLPCM 81% 49 ,125 .7 8$ VAM 70% 108 ,636 .8 6$ G5K 70% 107 ,973 .5 3$ G10 K 70% 99 ,437 .5 4$ G2K 59% 98 ,711 .8 0$ CAV 58% 28 ,920 .6 7$ BIG BLU 56% 99 ,737 .9 0$ LEGACY S ET 50% 95 ,276 .6 2$ GN/ATACMS 11% 6,280 .00$
$K
SSC
•Most Effective and Affordable in Small Scale Contingencies (SSC)•Most Lethal Standoff Weapon
•Wpn of Choice when Attrition could not be managed or Time Urgent
TNT
Equi
vale
nt E
xplo
sive
Wei
ght( Big BLU
G10K
BLU-109BLU-113
GLCAV
G5K
G2KVAM
CLPCM
GN/ATACMS 250
GSSCM1000 SLAM-ER
TLAM-C
AGM-142 Tactical Tomahawk
CALCM/AUP-3AUP-1
JASSM
DACMBM
GSSCM700
Slide 5UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
300 NM
• MOE#1 - Weapon System effective against Urgent Time Critical N Korea Hard Targets (HARTs, WMD, Missiles sites)•MOE#2 – Provides sufficient Range from Sea of Japan or Yellow sea:
–MOP#1:Threshold >300 nmi, Goal > 400nmi
•MOE#3 - Minimizes response time. –MOP#2: Threshold < 8min, Goal: 6 minute response time to 300 nm
•MOE#4 - Accurate delivery of payload to optimize W/H Lethality
– MOP#3:CEP 2.7 Meters unjammed: < 3.4 meters jammed–MOP#4: Orientation appropriate with target
• MOE#5 - Integrated with TLN Fire Contro3 System• MOE#6 - VLS launched (initially)• MOE#7 - Complies with Start, SALT Treaties
–Cruise Missile, VLS or Air Launched
JSSCM ACTD Warfighting Capabilities
Slide 6UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
JSSCM System Overview
Legacy• CROW (Creative Ramjet Ordnance Weapon)
– Nose Inlet Ramjet with 6 flights in 1962 - 64– Small Scale: 8x127 in, 327 lbs– Mach 3 @ 50,000 ft > 97 nmi
• RARE surfaced launched in 1970’s• PIP funded by ONR & others during 1983 - 1995
– Efficient Inlet – Short Length to Diameter (L/D) Propulsion– COTS Turbopump– Universal Autopilot W/ global data link for DGPS, BDA, TM, Real
time target updates
CharacteristicsACTD Growth
Cruise MissileVelocity Mach 4. Mach 6+Payload HDBT Tomahawk WDU-36/SubmunitionsRange nmi 300 -400 1200 - 1500Launcher VLS Sub/F15,F18,B52,B2Diameter (in) 21.2 diaLength (in) 233.4 256Weight (lbs -Air) 2280Weight (lbs Surface) 3400Cost $K <400 (unit buy 5000
per Naval Center for Cost Analysis,Validated by USAF CAG)
•Multi-Service
•Multi-Mission
•Low Cost
Slide 7UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
JSSCM TechnologyJSSCM Technology
MPEG of Technology Accomplishments
Slide 8UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
Standard Missile MK72 Booster
ACTDSystem Components &TRL
Nose Inlet Ramjet Airframe (CROW)
JASSM or M4 High energy Penetrator
TLN = TTWCS + LAM FC + NFCS Phase I+
TRL=9
TRL=9
TRL=8
TRL=9 TRL=5
TRL=6TRL=7
System Integration TRL=5-6Average TRL = 7.5
TRL=NASA Test Readiness Level
Slide 9UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
Objective: Close HARTS Tunnels ASAP after start of conflict
JSSCMOperational Concept
Boost toramjet
transitionPre-LaunchRamjet throttle back
Controlled impact on Target
•Pre-Planned Mission•Known Target GPS Coordinates
•Msl Powered up•INS/GPS Initiated <1min•Status Checks
11 Start of Conflict
22
Angle of Attack Maneuver
Launch33
44
55
66
77
Slide 10UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
ACTD Participants
• Lead Service - USN• User Sponsor-
– CINCPAC - Mike Reilley– Technical Manager S. Lyda
NAVAIR• Operational Manager
– USFK / LCol. Liberatore– 3RD Fleet – ADM Bucchi / Tim Wise
• Transition PEO– PEO (W) - RADM Chenevey
•Team Members• NAWCWD - TDA• NSWC-PH - VLS Launcher, FCS• NSWC-DD – TLN• Wright Patterson AFB – Propulsion Flow
Path• UK-MOD - Ramjet• Orbital Science Corp - Flight Vehicle
Systems• Lockheed Martin - Systems Integrator• Chemtronics - Airframe• M-Dot - FMS• DTRA - Targets, Lethality ??• Parallel Efforts
•AFRL - Eglin UL/MOD - Penetrating Payload•UK/MOD PMA 258 Air Launched IRRJ
Slide 11UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
JSSCM ACTD ScheduleJSSCM ACTD Schedule
• FY02 ACTD with two phases in 3 years w 4th year LRIP– Phase 1: Vehicle Integration & demonstration, Payload Sizing, DT w/ Launcher
• Vehicle Testing @ White Sands Missile Range• Flight Tests w/High Velocity D-GPS / CERPA Guidance, Low CEP capability
– Phase 2: Operational Assessment• Weapon Lethality against Hard Targets @ White Sands• Integrate with TLN• MUA Demonstration from Aegis
– LRIP & Deploy residual assets on Aegis ships
ID Task Name Duration Start1 Airframe Risk Reduction Design 121 days Mon 10/2/00
2 System Analysis Trades 121 days Tue 3/20/01
3 Contracting 240 days Mon 10/2/00
4 OSD ACTD Approval/Start 0 days Thu 11/1/01
5 Vehicle DT&E 391 days Thu 11/1/01
6 TLN Integration 180 days Tue 3/19/02
7 VLS-Flight Test Vehicle 1 (PP Flight) 0 days Thu 5/1/03
8 Avionics Integration 100 days Fri 5/2/03
9 VLS-FTV 2 (Guided) 0 days Thu 9/18/03
10 Payload Integration 100 days Fri 9/19/03
11 VLS-FTV 3 ( HT test) 0 days Thu 2/5/04
12 VLS-FTV 4 (Ship Integration) 0 days Tue 6/1/04
13 VLS-FTV 5 (Extended Range) 0 days Sun 9/12/04
14 Military Utility Assessment 70 days Mon 9/13/04
15 Residual Production 203 days Mon 12/20/04
16 Final Delivery USFK 0 days Wed 9/28/05
11/1
5/1
9/18
2/5
6/1
9/12
9/
Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q12001 2002 2003 2004 2005 200
Slide 12UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
JSSCMJSSCMMilitary Utility AssessmentMilitary Utility Assessment
05/0305/03
DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT TRANSDEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENTASSESSMENT TRANSTRANS
CONOPSDoctrinal / TT&P issuesAssessment Plan DevelopmentORD Initiation – POM for Transition
CONOPSCONOPSDoctrinal / TT&P issuesDoctrinal / TT&P issuesAssessment Plan DevelopmentAssessment Plan DevelopmentORD Initiation ORD Initiation –– POM for TransitionPOM for Transition
MU ASSESSMENTMU ASSESSMENTMU ASSESSMENT
WHITE SANDSWHITE SANDSFLIGHT TESTFLIGHT TEST
02/0402/04WHITE SANDSWHITE SANDSFLIGHT TESTFLIGHT TESTHard TargetHard Target
06/0406/04LAKE EARLELAKE EARLE
FLIGHT TESTFLIGHT TEST
09/0409/04TBDTBD
BARKING SANDSBARKING SANDS
FY/02FY/02
IMPLEMENTATION“illities” AssessmentTraining
IMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATION““illitiesillities” Assessment” AssessmentTrainingTraining
TRANSISTIONTRANSISTIONTRANSISTION
01/0501/05MUAMUA
02/0402/04WHITE SANDSWHITE SANDSFLIGHT TESTFLIGHT TEST
Slide 13UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
Cost Item Cost $MBaseline VLS Growth Cost Issue
• JSSCM DT&E 17 - 2 Multiple agencies• JASSM Warhead Acq&Int 3 0• Mk-72 Boosters 11 -4 MK72 Avail.• Platform Integration 20 -6 TLN Integration• AUR Tests (7) 15 0• Training/ MUA/ ILS/Spares 7 -3• AUR Residuals 10 (10) 0
Total $79M
Contracting Approach: Full and open competitive announcement under the authority of 10 USC 2519 "Federal Defense Laboratory Diversification Program to pursue the national security objectives of 10 USC 2501. COMMERCE BUSINESS DAILY 25 JANUARY 2000. SOL N68936-00-R-0034
JSSCMACTD Cost / Funding/Contracting
FUNDING ($M)
N7/PMA 258 POM 5 5
4.0 5.5
TBD 10 16.25 13.75 5.
Discretionary .5 1 00 01 02 03 04 05 06
OSD 3.75 6.25 6.25 3.5Totals 15 25 25 14
SFRJ Plus+ 3.5 4.5 UK/MOD 1.25 2.5 ? ?
Slide 14UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
JSSCM ACTD Team
COMMANDER IN CHIEF, U.S. PACIFIC COMMAND (USCINCPAC) CAMP H.M. SMITH, HAWAII 968614028
JOGS 3882 24 Jan 01
To: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense 3000 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301
Subj: USCINCPAC ACTD PROPOSAL SUBMISSION FOR FY 02
Ref (a) Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Advanced Systems & Concepts) letter, Subject: Fiscal Year 2002 Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) Proposals
End: (1) Joint Supersonic Cruise Missile ACTD Proposal
(2) Joint Supersonic Cruise Missile ACTD Quad Chart (3) Time Critical Counter Targeting ACTD Proposal
(4) Time Critical Counter Targeting ACTD Quad Chart (5) Overwatch ACTD Proposal (6) Overwatch ACTO Quad Chart
1. In response to Ref (a) request for submission of FY 02 Advanced Concept
Technology Demonstration (ACTD) proposals I am pleased to forward three candidates for consideration. These proposals have been developed with the Army Space and Missile Defense Command and the Naval Air Warfare Center, Weapons Division with substantial input from the USPACOM staff and components. USCINCPAC is prepared to sponsor these candidates should they survive the selection process.
2. We believe that these proposals represent cutting edge technologies ii~~
their respective areas and provide significant technological and operational improvements for Precision Strike and Full Dimension Protection. • The Joint Supersonic Cruise Missile ACTD candidate provides a M4+
capability to deliver penetrator and brilliant munitions from ships and aircraft against fixed and mobile targets.
• The Time Critical Counter Targeting ACTD candidate provides precision counter targeting information to strike aircraft and artillery to engage surface-to-air missile launchers, transporter-erector-launchers, artillery
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE OHIO 45423
6 April 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR STEPHEN F. LYDA
NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER WEAPONS DIVISION CODE 4.7.H.G.OODD CHINA LAKE, CA 93555-6001
FROM: AFRL/PRA
SUBJECT: Participation in the Proposed Joint Supersonic Cruise Missile ACTD
1. As a result of our discussion on 5 April 2001, the Aerospace Propulsion Office of the AFRL Propulsion Directorate is very interested in participating in the proposed Joint Supersonic Cruise Missile (355CM) Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD). We believe that there are several areas where our expertise and knowledge can help bring the proposed effort to fruition:
a. Airframe and propulsion trade studies and concept assessment.
b. Ramjet flowpath analysis, including 3D unsteady computational fluid dynamics.
c. Experimental analysis, including direct-connect high-Mach combustor tests.
2. For the foreseeable future, we are committed to developing scramjet propulsion technologies. In order to participate in the ACTD, we will require additional funding to enable us to focus the relevant personnel on the JSSCM project. We will work with you to determine an appropriate balance of effort versus available funding and will need to formalize our intent via a Memorandum of Understanding.
3. Please continue to work with Glenn Liston (DSN 785-2175) on this matter.
PARKER L. BUCKLEY, Chief Aerospace Propulsion Office
Slide 15UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
JSSCM Transition JSSCM Transition Ltrs Ltrs
From: Program Executive Officer, Cruise Missiles and Joint Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (PMA-258)
To: Chief of Naval Operations (N8)
Subj: OSD SUPPORT OF GENERIC SUPERSONIC CRUISE MISSILE (GSSCM) DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM
1. PMA 258 strongly supports the concepts and technical capabilities purported by Generic Supersonic Cruise Missile (GSSCM). The GSSCM program would enter the production phase immediately subsequent to the end of the presently proposed production schedule of the SLAM ER, ATACMS, and JASSM. …...
Steve,Following the review meeting with our
DEC(DS), MOD Customer yesterday it has been agreed that the UK will support the programme. The UK contribution would be broken down into stages, at whichbreakpoints/reviews would be used to commit the UK to the next stage. As you well know getting large funds released is going to take some more time and this staged approach will ensure that the UK can be on boardfrom the start.
This agreement was only reached on the basis that the UK has a full involvement in theprogramme. This means that we have involvement at the "total systems level" and not just the IRR technology level. It isimportant that we make this clear as this is the only basis on which the UK MOD will continue to support the programme.
... the UK may be interested in taking the ACTD into an integration (E&MD) phase.Best Regards, Peter Doidge MOD Advance Concepts (received 12/21/2000)
Slide 16UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
JSSCM ACTDJSSCM ACTDParallel EffortsParallel Efforts
1) Light Weight -Low Cost Booster2) M4 Thermo baric
Penetrating Warhead Thermalbaric Fill
ES-1 Steel Case w/ Reactive Metal Internal Load Baring Structure
High Explosive
3) Integral Rocket Ramjet•Decreased AUPC
•Increased Range
•Improved Lethality
•Additional Launch PlatformsPartners: UK/ MOD, PMA 258
Partners: Standard Missile, IMAD OfficePartners: AFRL-Eglin, UK/ MOD, OSD
Slide 17UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
JSSCM Future Missions:JSSCM Future Missions:Need SummaryNeed Summary
7.9 %
Close Air Support*Fixed, Soft Targets
15.8%*Trucks, Tanks, APCs,
Short Range SAMS
Fixed HARDTargets (1650)
TBMsSAMS
6.7 %
1.1%(275)
.2 %(55)
Based upon JSF Campaign Analysisdtd 1995, TacThunder
1) HOW MANY ARE NEEDED SWA/NEA ? = 6,841MRC/MTW-East, 2010 25,836 targets 2) What are the distance these targets
are located ?=1000 mi for 95%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 3000
IRAQ - Saudi
IRAN - Turkey
CHINA - Taiwan
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400Range (NM)
% o
f Tar
gets
Eng
aged
Improvement from2 LOCAAS
Baseline Mach 4Performance
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Range (NM)
% o
f Tar
gets
Enga
geab
le Composite Scenario3 Min BMC4I TimelineSOAD
C-V6
2
3
4
5678
Missile Block Speed in Mach
TCMT Analysis Eglin AFB 1997•Fixed TCT < 14 min @ 200nmi+•Attack TCMT w/LOCAAS < 400 nmi…High Speed Weapons Utility Study, CNA 7/2000
3) What is the speed needed to prosecute? = M4+
4) Are Submunitions Beneficial? Yes
Slide 18UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
JSSCMJSSCMMission Growth AreasMission Growth Areas
BLU 108 – 7
Mk74 load = 484
Mk77 load = 1368
Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control - Dallas Proprietary
LOCAASDispenseLOCAASDispense
GPS/INS NAVLADAR WideArea Search
GPS/INS NAVLADAR WideArea Search
IntercomIntercom
11
22
High Probability of Kill With 1 Missile High Probability of Kill With 1 Missile --Timely Precision Strike for Time Critical Mobile TargetsTimely Precision Strike for Time Critical Mobile Targets
*Maximum*Maximum
Target/AcqIdentificationTarget/AcqIdentification
33
•LethalAimpointSelection/•Target Attack•BDA
•LethalAimpointSelection/•Target Attack•BDA
44
TIME CRITICAL AND MOBIL TARGETS
HARDEN DEEPLY BURIED TARGETS
SURFACE LAUNCHEDAIR LAUNCHED
Extended RangeSubmunitions
Slide 19UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
Conclusions
• JSSCM ACTD Provides IMMEDIATE DEFEAT of Time Urgent Hard Targets in N. Korea (and World Wide) which can not be held at risk by other weapons
– Based upon Technology which can be fielded with Test Readiness Level = 7.5– Is supported by PACOM, CENTCOM, USJFCOM, EUCOM, USAFE– Has Coalition partner interest (UK/ROK)– Is Joint Service with WPAFB and Eglin AFB (AMCOM pending)– Transitions to PEO(W) / USFK/ UK– Has N7 direction to proceed– Has potential funding @ OSD, N7 & Congressional Interest– Transition to Milestone B/II affordability improvements, additional missions, & platforms
for next generation weapon family
• JSSCM Provides a “Leap Ahead” Cruise Missile Weapon– Unique in the combination of Range, Speed, Payloads, Infrastructure, & Cost– Increased “Non-Nuclear” Lethality against
» World Wide Hard Targets & Time Critical & Mobile Targets– In conjunction with Rapid Decisive Operations can deny, degrade, or destroy strategic
and operational centers of gravity without having to conduct extensive buildup of forces in the theater of operations.
Slide 20UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
JSSCMJSSCMNK EffectivenessNK Effectiveness
When used in a RDO environment, JSSCM can deny, degrade, or destroy NK strategic and operational centers of gravity within 15 min.
Questions ?Questions ?
Joint SuperSonic Cruise Missile(JSSCM)
ACTD
NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTERWeapons Division
End of Presentation
Slide 22UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
JSSCM Flight Vehicle Subsystems
COTS Subsystems
Inlet CFDModel
Aero Tests
400.0
500.0
600.0
700.0
800.0
900.0
1000.0
1100.0
3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7
THRUST, LBDRAG, LBTH
RU
ST, L
B
MACH NUMBER
JSSCM THRUST-DRAG PERFORMANCECRUISE AT 76,000 FT
Slide 23UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
CEP/ Jamming
• URAP Guidance System– Navigation Module – 80 way points– Control Module – pre-programmed maneuvers– Telemetry Module ->128 data streams– 67 units procured @ $37K/unit– 34 flight tests -4 at supersonic speeds MA 31
• CERPA Antenna by Ball Aerospace– Conformal Array– Body Shielding– Altitude Attenuation– Missile Speed flies through en-route jamming
• Trajectory Shaping eliminates vertical uncertainty errors
• Accurate– 2.7m CEP, 3.4m Jammed per HDBTDC AOA
FY 2000
• USAF/ Orbital flights ~ 1 M accuracy
4 5. 4
3 3. 0
1 5. 0
1 2. 0
FLI GHT PATH ANGLE (deg)
1 2 5
1 0 0
50
25
75
040 50 60 7 0 80 9010 2 0 3 0
Nav
igat
iona
l Acc
urac
y (F
t)
Existing GPS Performance
(L1)
WAGE Performance
Projected JSSCM system performance
JSSCM has low CEP & is GPS Jamming Immune
Slide 24UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
High-Speed Propulsion OptionsHigh-Speed Propulsion Options
Affordability
• Cost Analysis for GSSCM provided by Naval Center for Cost Analysis (NCCA)
• Costs Validated by Air Force CAG HDBTDC AoA
GSSCM JASSM TacTomunits 5000 5000 5000
Fly Away $394K $400K $529
C-C(includes manufacturing
cost)
SiC(includes
manufacturing cost)
TiInconel
17-4 Steel
Graphite/Polyw/Kevlar
Nb 103Black Glass
2 4 6 8 100
200
400
600
800
Mach
$ / l
bm
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
Lead
ing
Edge
Tem
pera
ture
, deg
F
JSSCM has a low AUP cost1) No Terminal Guidance (DSMAC, TERCOM)
2) Propulsion cost reduction for turbine (80K) vsramjet (17K)
3) COTS: Automotive turbopumps ~ $7k Chemtronics Airframe ~ $40K
4) Existing subsystems: URAP guidance @37K ea, Mk-72, payload
5) Cruise speed complies with existing materials
Speed (Mach Number)0 2 4 6 8
1
0
2
Time (Hr)
Scramjet0.5
1.5
RamjetCostEngine
TIME TO COVER 750 NMTIME TO COVER 750 NM
RelativeTurbo-Jet
Slide 25UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFLPOC: S. Lyda
AFRL – Orbital Sciences (OSC) Demonstrated 2000
Objectives:• Demonstrate a Mach 4+, penetrating payload w/ 300 lbs eq. Thermo baric fill • Build upon ongoing AFRL/DTRA penetrating efforts•Team with DTRA , AFRL, UK/MOD•Utilize as alternative payload if successful for JSSCM LRIP•ROM Delta Cost $9.8M w/10 residuals•POC Dr. Mike Cramer – Eglin, M Swett NAWCWD
High Energy Penetrating WarheadHigh Energy Penetrating Warhead
Technology Drivers• Case Survivability @ impacts of 3000 to 4000 fps
(Risk Med)• 250 & 660 lb penetrator Warheads tested by OSC
under contract to AFRL with Sandia, LANL, and others at velocities up to Mach 4.
• Fuze survivability & operability (Med Risk)• The Hard Target Smart Fuze is under development by
the Air Force is prime subsystem• Multi event fuze an Hard Target fuze are alternatives
• Energetic Fill Insensitivity (High Risk)• Thermo Baric energy coupling for lethality (Med
Risk)
M4 Thermo baric Penetrating Warhead
Thermalbaric Fill
ES-1 Steel Case w/ Reactive Metal Internal Load Baring Structure
High Explosive
AdvancedHard TargetFuze
Impact Conditions Guidance Flight Angle Angle of Attack Impact Velocity Penetration DepthMTD-1 3.2m -89.9de <0.2 deg 3,300 fps 31 ftMTD-3 1.0m -90.0deg 0.1 deg 4,063 fps 45 ft
Slide 26UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
JSSCM ACTDJSSCM ACTDStatus SummaryStatus Summary
• ACTD 1st on PACOM FY02 ACTD list – Supported by CENTCOM• ACTD Selected by ONR (7/32) Mr. Ben Riley• PEO(W) Transition Organization
– PMA258/282 – SLAM Office POM Wedge in FY04, Poised to initiate ACTD• UK/MOD has agreed to join ACTD effort. Initial funds 2.1M lbs • Government industry Team forming
– Lockheed Martin-Prime, Orbital, Chemtronics, NAWCWD, NSWD, WPAFB – USAF (stated they will join for KE warhead, interest in Air Launched version) 5/5/01– MICOM (Interested in future generation of supersonic missiles)
• Socializing ACTD– ADUS-AT Dr Daly – various meetings– N7 ADM McGinn – 1/10/01 directed that ACTD proceed– Briefing to DSN (TSC) ADM Altweg (ret) 1/12/01 & 4/24/01 - endorsed ACTD– Briefing provided to Tomahawk Leadership Team N764
» Capt Hoffman assigned Capt Wise, Cdr Heiss as AO– Briefed Counterproliferation and FTO 2/26/01– N76 ADM Kelly –2/26/01 Support contingent upon LASM penetrator comparison– DDUSD-Strategic & Tactical Systems (Air Warfare) Dr Mutzelburg endorsing ACTD
» Jointly w/ Dr Ullrich OSD(S&T)/WS submitted $90M FY02 proposal for JSSCM– DTRA Dr Vayl Oxford & Dr Chuck McKinnon 3/1/01 Interested but not committed to date– Briefed SubTech N77 4/24/01 Initiating High Speed Weapon program for boomers– Briefed RADM Balisle 5/3/01 – Endorsed concept w/ concerns on transition planning
Slide 27UNCLASSIFIED 6/18/2001, SFL
JSSCM ACTDJSSCM ACTDTechnical RisksTechnical Risks
• Mk 72 Booster – Off the Shelf – Booster takeover margins - Low Risk– Total impulse from MK-72 booster is of concern for cold conditions– Alternative to open inlet for lower takeover speed & cruise velocity or Lower payload weight
• Ramjet Propulsion – Ramjets flying, specific design tested – Low Risk • Airframe Design - Low Risk
– Weight growth is driver for ACTD performance » ACTD range is 300 / 400nmi allows for weight growth
– Design Trades being conducted by NAWCWD, Lockheed, & Chemtronics in FY01 » DCT estimate of $40K/unit
– Based upon missiles with similar design: Soviet Yakhont , CROW and RARE (seen in MPEG)
• Avionics – Based on existing URAP design - Low Risk• Actuator - Low Risk
– Based upon existing designs– 1st order heat analysis indicates satisfactory cooling & performance margins
• Payload – Risk dependent upon OSD approach– M4 Penetrator – based on on-going NTACMP, AF efforts –Moderate risk– JASSM / SLAM – Low risk
• Integration - Moderate Risk