Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk Repository Fringe 2014 - Edinburgh - 31 July 2014 1

Workshop 1. (10/15mins) Context - Jisc Repository Shared Services Project Reminder - Publications Router function & offer Update - HEFCE AAMs & early survey results 2. (20 mins) Discuss & Input - Group breakout 3. (10 mins) Report & Summary Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk Repository Fringe 2014 - Edinburgh - 31 July 2014 2 http://broker.edina.ac.uk/

Bringing together key repository services to deliver a connected national infrastructure to support OA 3Repository Fringe 2014 - Edinburgh - 31 July 2014

Support for Integration Repositories to implement - patches, scripts and plug-ins produced by repository shared services. Support is being planned via: Repository Support Project (RSP) Planning co-ordination with platform-specific support through Eprints Services, the DSpace community and Fedora. 4Repository Fringe 2014 - Edinburgh - 31 July 2014

Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk Repository Fringe 2014 - Edinburgh - 31 July 5

Offer to Supplier Forward your content directly to IRs Expose your OA content through GUI and API for browsing and downloading Accept your metadata: metadata only, metadata and OA full-text, or metadata and embargoed full- text Identify target IRs using affiliation in your metadata Allow onward tracking of your content Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk Repository Fringe 2014 - Edinburgh - 31 July 2014 6 http://broker.edina.ac.uk/

Offer to Consumer Direct Delivery of OA content Get OA content from all data suppliers to IR SWORD endpoint Get all content using one single metadata format Importer scripts available for Eprints 3.3. & 3.2, DSpace 1.8 Direct Delivery of All content As above (without DSpace) plus Agree to manage embargo periods Get OA and embargoed content Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk Repository Fringe 2014 - Edinburgh - 31 July 2014 7 http://broker.edina.ac.uk/

Offer to Consumer Browse See all OA content from all data suppliers Web GUI http://broker.edina.ac.uk/ Search by target repository and author Harvest Get all OA content from all data suppliers Use OAI-PMH APIs http://broker.edina.ac.uk/cgi/oai2 Search by target repository, author and funder Choose from multiple formats Notification Receive monthly email alerts of new content from all data suppliers for chosen repositories Self-register at http://broker.edina.ac.uk/cgi/postcard_registration Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk Repository Fringe 2014 - Edinburgh - 31 July 2014 8 http://broker.edina.ac.uk/

HEFCE REF OA mandate Change the requirements AAMs Require new workflows Explore, support, revise & adapt Chance to Input Jisc survey of HEIs Circulated via UKCoRR, ARMA, RLUK, SCONUL 2-18 July 2014 113 respondents Some duplicate institutions responses from different people within same institution Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk Repository Fringe 2014 - Edinburgh - 31 July 2014 9

How well would each of the following ways of getting the accepted manuscripts into your institution's system(s) work for you? Jisc Publications Router Repository Fringe 2014, Edinburgh 10 Repository Fringe 2014 - Edinburgh - 31 July 2014

i. Third-party service to push content to your system (e.g. using SWORD). Wouldn't work 8% OK at a push 11% Satisfactory 23% Ideal solution 21% Don't know 37% 11 Repository Fringe 2014 - Edinburgh - 31 July 2014

ii. Pull the content into your system using an API. Wouldn't work 1% OK at a push 9% Satisfactory 30% Ideal solution 29% Don't know 31% 12 Repository Fringe 2014 - Edinburgh - 31 July 2014

iii. Receive the content via email as file attachments. Wouldn't work 7% OK at a push 43% Satisfactory 30% Ideal solution 6% Don't know 14% 13 Repository Fringe 2014 - Edinburgh - 31 July 2014

If there is another solution not listed above that would work better for you, please describe it here. Deposit at publication Our academics receive their post-prints and upload them to the repository. Why or how would other systems be needed or help? Solutions above are good, the ideal source of this information and metadata would be from publishers. SWORD-like technologies would be interesting provided that institution/author matching is really good. A pull system would give us more control and reduce the scope for errors 14 Some example replies Repository Fringe 2014 - Edinburgh - 31 July 2014

Anything that involves minimal reliance on academics updating information etc would be ideal. I can see how this could work for the meta data, but not sure how we'd also get the post-print. Self deposit directly into system Publishers to provide the metadata to institutions on acceptance. We cannot rely on authors to do this. researchers will have to do it themselves - we can't rely on management or software to do it for them. being notified of accepted manuscripts by publishers so that we can liaise with authors 15 More example replies Repository Fringe 2014 - Edinburgh - 31 July 2014

Discussions with publishers Representations are still underway Most publishers open to this agenda Most interested in principle in depositing via Router Uncertain about technical issues Jisc to make more specific proposal to them in late September 16Repository Fringe 2014 - Edinburgh - 31 July 2014

Breakout Small group Discuss the barriers & issues Inform developments Suggested questions Choose 3 questions/topics max 1 reporter per group Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk Repository Fringe 2014 - Edinburgh - 31 July 2014 17 http://broker.edina.ac.uk/

Summary Report from each group Refine requirements Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk Repository Fringe 2014 - Edinburgh - 31 July 2014 18 http://broker.edina.ac.uk/