Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003 1 Jim Brau April 4, 2003 The Other Detectors and Associated R&D...
-
Upload
gregory-ryan -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003 1 Jim Brau April 4, 2003 The Other Detectors and Associated R&D...
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
1
Jim BrauApril 4, 2003
The Other Detectorsand Associated R&D
• In addition to the TESLA detector, some other detector configurations have been under study:– JLC Detector– North American SD– North American L (similar to TESLA/JLC)
• Different choices have been made, aimed at the same physics
Thanks to Y. Fujii, and my NAmer colleagues, for help in preparing this talk
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
2
Comparison of Detector
Configurations
(Ray Frey)
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
3
LC Detector Requirements
• Any design must be guided by these goals:
– a) Two-jet mass resolution comparable to the natural widths of W and Z for an unambiguous identification of the final states.
– b) Excellent flavor-tagging efficiency and purity (for both b- and c-quarks, and hopefully also for s-quarks).
– c) Momentum resolution capable of reconstructing the recoil-mass to di-muons in Higgs-strahlung with resolution better than beam-energy spread .
– d) Hermeticity (both crack-less and coverage to very forward angles) to precisely determine the missing momentum.
– e) Timing resolution capable of separating bunch-crossings to suppress overlapping of events .
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
4
SD (Silicon Detector)
• Conceived as a high performance detector for NLC• Reasonably uncompromised performance But• Constrained & Rational cost
– parametric cost analysis
• Accept the notion that excellent energy flow calorimetry is required, and explore optimization of a Tungsten-Silicon EMCal and the implications for the detector architecture…
Recently this configurationhas been getting serious attention, as a result of studiesbeing organized by M. Breidenbach
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
5
Architecture arguments• Silicon is expensive, so limit area by limiting
radius
• Get back BR2 by pushing B (~5T)
– This argument may be weak, considering quantitative This argument may be weak, considering quantitative cost trade-offs. (see plots)cost trade-offs. (see plots)
• Maintain tracking resolution by using silicon strips
• Buy safety margin for VXD with the 5T B-field.
• Keep (?) track finding by using 5 VXD space points to determine track
– tracker measures sagitta.
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
7
Silicon Tungsten EMCal
• Figure of merit something like BR2/ – where = rpixel rMoliere
• Maintain the great Moliere radius of tungsten (9 mm) by minimizing the gaps between ~2.5 mm tungsten plates. Dilution is (1+Rgap/Rw)– Could a layer of silicon/support/readout etc. fit in a 2.5
mm gap? (Very Likely) – Even less?? 1.5 mm goal?? (Dubious)
• Requires aggressive electronic-mechanical integration!
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
8
Silicon Tungsten EMCal (cont.)
• Diode pixels ~ 5 mm square on largest hexagon fitting in largest available wafer. – 6” available now – 300 mm when??– Consider tracking as well as E flow in picking pixel dimension.
• Develop readout electronics of preamplification through digitization, IO on bump bonded chip. – Upgrade would be full integration of readout on detector wafer.
• Optimize shaping time for small diode capacitance. – Probably can do significant bunch localization within train.!!!
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
9
Structure
Pixels on 6” Wafer
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
10
Thermal Management• Cooling is a fundamental problem: GLAST system is ~2
mW/channel. Assume 1000 pixels/wafer and power pulsing duty factor for NLC of 10-3 (10 µsec @120 Hz), for 2 mW average power. – Preliminary engineering indicates goal of under 100 mW ok.
• Assume fixed temperature heat sink (water cooling) at outer edge of an octant, and conduction through a ~1 mm thick Cu plane sandwiched with the W and G10: ΔT~140C.
• OK, but need power pulsing!!! ..and maintaining the noise/resolution is a serious engineering challenge.
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
13
Silicon Tracker• SLC/SLD Prejudice: Silicon is robust against
machine mishaps; wires & gas are not.• Mechanical:
– Low mass C-Fiber support structure– Chirped Interferometry Geodesy (Oxford System) Atlas has
developed a beautiful chirped interferometric alignment system – a full geodetic grid tieing together the elements of their tracker. Can such a system reduce requirements on the space frame precision and stability – reducing its mass and cost?
• Silicon Development– Build on GLAST development,
• Add double ended bond pads, and• Develop special ladder end detector w/ bump bond
array• Reduce mass, complexity at ends
• Employ track finding in 5-layer CCD vertex detector
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
14
Tracker Electronics
• Plan is to string 10 cm square detectors to barrel half lengths and readout from ends.
• Design “end” detectors to route strips to rectangular grid for bump bonding to read out chip (ROC).
• ROC is ASIC with all preamplification, shaping, discrimination, compression, and transmission functionality. Includes power pulsing.
• Hasn’t been done!• Electronics:
– Develop RO for half ladder (~1.5 m)
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
15
• Hcal assumed to be 4 thick, with 46 layers 5 cm thick alternating with 1.5 cm gaps.
• Could use “digital” detectors, eg high reliability RPC’s (Have they been invented yet???)
• Hcal radiator non-magnetic metal – probably copper or stainless– Tungsten much too expensive– Lead possible, but mechanically more painful.
• Hcal thickness important cost driver, even though Hcal cost small. – And where is it relative to coil?
HCal
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
16
Hcal inside coil
HCAL outside coil
Quadrant View
0.000
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
5.000
6.000
7.000
8.000
0.000 2.000 4.000 6.000 8.000
m
m
Beam Pipe
Trkr
Ecal
Hcal
Coil
MT
Endcap
Endcap_Hcal
Endcap_Ecal
VXD
Endcap_Trkr
Coil
Quadrant View
0.000
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
5.000
6.000
7.000
8.000
0.000 2.000 4.000 6.000 8.000
m
m
Beam Pipe
Trkr
Ecal
Hcal
Coil
MT
Endcap
Endcap_Hcal
Endcap_Ecal
VXD
Endcap_TrkrCoil
HCal Location ComparisonHcal Delta Cost
-35.0
-30.0
-25.0
-20.0
-15.0
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
HCal Lam da
De
lta
M$
Scale – Relative to 4 Inside!!
Hcal Delta Cost
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
HCal Lam da
Del
ta M
$
80 M$
60 M$
40 M$
20 M$
0 M$
0 M$
-10 M$
-20 M$
-30 M$
24 6
24 6
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
19
More Cost trade-offsCost Partial R_Trkr
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
140.0
0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5
R_Trkr (m)
Del
ta M
$
$ vs R_Trkr
~1.7M$/cm Delta $, Fixed
BR2=5x1.252
Cost Partial, Fixed BR^2
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
B
Del
ta M
$
1.25
1.35
1.45
1.55
1.65
1.75
1.85
Linear
Power
Radius
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
21
Detector R&D in North America
• Diversity of R&D projects
• Not necessarily aimed at specific detector configurations
• Several years of support for simulation is now in transition into invigorated hardware effort– funding for this new era is nearly (but not
quite) established
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
22
A University Program of Accelerator and Detector Research for the Linear Collider
2002 ProposalProposed
BudgetNo.
projects
Accelerator Physics $1,003,783 33Luminosity, Energy, Polarization $171,541 9Vertex Detector $119,100 3Tracking $395,662 11Calorimetry $514,540 12Muon system and Particle ID $148,899 3
TOTAL $2,353,525 71
In addition focussed R&D effort continues in Canada
http://www.hep.uiuc.edu/LCRD/html_files/proposal.html
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
23
North American Tracking
ALCPG Tracking Working Group:B. Schumm/D. Karlen/K. Riles
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
24
Gaseous Tracking
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
25
Vertex Detector
Oregon/Yale/SLACRadiation hardness studies
removed SLD VXD3 for analysisspare ladder studies
Developing new CCD detector prototypeStudying mechanical issuesDesign readout for X-Band operation
Oklahoma/Boston/FermilabDevelopment and design of an LC ASIC for CCD readout and data
PurdueStudy of the Mechanical Behavior of Thin silicon and theDevelopment of hybrid silicon pixels for the LC
North American Vertex Detector R&D
ALCPG Vertex Detector Working Group:J. Brau, N. Roe
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
26
Calorimeter Detector R&D in N. America
ALCPG Calorimeter Working Group:R. Frey/A. Turcot/D. Chakraborty
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
29
Scintillator Based Muon System R&D
ALCPG Muon Working Group:G. Fisk
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
32
• Ongoing R&D Work: – Luminosity
• dL/dE analysis (SLAC, Wayne St.) • Beamstrahlung Monitor (Wayne St.) • Pair monitor (Hawaii, in collab. with Tohoku) • Forward calorimeter (Iowa St.)
– Energy • WISRD spectrometer (UMass, Oregon) • BPM spectrometer (Notre Dame)
– Polarization • x-line simulations (SLAC, Tufts) • Quartz fiber calorimter (Iowa, Tennessee)
Many important topics uncovered...
Beamline Instrumentation
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
35
Testbeams
• World-wide R&D web page on testbeams:– http://www-lc.fnal.gov/lc_testbeams/tbpage.html
• Assessment underway on testbeam needs and resources Recent study:
– Linear Collider Calorimeter Testbeam Study Group Report
• S. Magill, J. Repond, A. S. Turcot, J. Yu• http://www-d0.fnal.gov/~yu/lc-tb-report.pdf
– This report should be broadened to include other subsystems
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
36
Test Beam Needs (collected by Gene Fisk to date)
Group Apparatus Beam Conditions When/Where
1 TESLA/CALICE J.-C. Brient/P. Dauncy et al
E_Cal/H_Cal E-flow Tests
e, , p 1 - 100 GeV
Mid 2004 – 2005 Setup; DESY/CERN Fermilab/Protvino?
2 JLC-Cal – Y. Fujii et al EM & H Cal Prototypes
e, , p 2 - 200 GeV
KEK/2004 US/Europe 2004 - 08
3 LC- Cal – R. Frey et al E_Cal H_Cal Prototypes
e to 10 GeV e, , p =>120
E_cal at SLAC ‘04; E & H_Cal @ FNAL
4 Digital H_Cal – Argonne, NIU, UTA, et al
H_Cal Prototypes e, , p =>120 Fermilab – 2005-‘06
5 IP Instrumentation Woods/Torrence et al
Gas Č counter/cal Quartz fiber cal Sec. Emission det. W. angle, vis light beamstrahlung Synchrotron rad BPM E spectro
e/ to 100 GeV; LINX for beamstrahlung; Polarized e’s
Various
6 IP Instr and Calorimetry Onel/Winn et al
Compton polar. w/ quartz fiber cal; Sec. Emission det. Č compensated cal
e , p =>120
< 20, < 300 GeV Fermilab CERN PS & SPS
7 Tile/fiber Tests R. Ruchti
Detector prototypes, timing,
e, 10 – 100 GeV
Fermilab
8 Muon Prototype Detectors TESLA/ALC
RPCs and Scintillator based
e’s 50-750 MeV e, =>120GeV
Frascati 2004 Fermilab 2005
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
37
JLC Design
• The JLC strategy for choice of technologies in baseline R&D
– 1) No Proof-of-Principle R&D.
– 2) Constructible within affordable cost.
• JLC official view, as stated in the 'Roadmap Report' (http://lcdev.kek.jp/RMdraft/ )
– "Extensive R&D studies have been carried out in Asia, Europe, and North America toward the same goal, but with slightly different technology choices in some sub-detectors. International cooperation in common technologies and in cross-examination on different approaches is maintained. Design of the total detector system will be done within a few years by integrating the best technologies achieved."
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
39
JLC Detector R&D
– 3.1) Vertex Detector
• a) done or finishing soon – excellent spatial resolution (plot)– room-temperature operation (good S/N by Multi-Pinned Phase
operation) – radiation hardness measurement : 90Sr, 252Cf, electron-beam
irradiation=in analysis
• b) in progress or to do – CTI improvement : two-phase clocking, thermal charge injection,
notch structure (plot)– fast readout : test-board fabrication in progress – thinned CCD (20micrometer) : flatness, stability, reproducibility – precise estimation of background by a full simulation with detailed
beamline components
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
40
JLC Detector R&D– 3.2) Intermediate Tracker
• in progress or to do – Si-sensor fabrication and test-module construction – Simulation study of VTX-IT-CT combined tracking (plot)
– 3.3) Central Tracker
• a) done or finishing soon – spatial resolution – effect of gas contamination – Lorentz angle measurement – dE/dx measurement – positive-ion space-charge effect (plot)
• b) in progress or to do – Two-track separation performance with a test chamber using parallel
laser beam (plot) – Z-measurement with charge-division – Creeping of aluminum wire – Full-simulation study on Pt resolution, bunch-tagging capability, and
physics sensitivity
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
41
JLC Detector R&D
– 3.4) Calorimeter
• a) done or finishing soon – hardware compensation, energy response linearity, energy
resolution (stochastic term) (plot) – machine-ability of tiny tiles, assemble-ability – performance of WLS-readout SHmax
• b) in progress or to do – granularity optimization with a full simulation – photon yield and non-uniformity improvement for RectTile EMcal – performance study of strip-array EMcal : beamtest, simulation,
ghost-rejection (plot) – direct-APD-readout SHmax – photon detectors (multi-channel HPD/HAPD, EBCCD etc.)
– 3.5) Muon System
• no effort
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
46
Conclusion
There is much to learn from the differing choices of independent groups in the world that are developing full LC detector concepts and studying their advantages and disadvantages.
We much do an honest comparison and assessment leading to improved detectors that we will eventually build and use for the LC physics program.
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
47
Extras
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
48
EMCal Readout Board
Silicon Diode Array
Readout Chip
Network Interconnect
~1m
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
49
• Beam EnergyEbeam ~ 200 ppm from 350 - 1000 TeVUpstream BPM + Downstream WISRD Spect.
in forward detector (~200 mRad) • Polarization
P/P ~ 0.25% (Pe- only) P/P ~ 0.10% (Pe+ also)Downstream Compton polarimetert-channel WW scattering
• Absolute LuminosityL/L ~ 0.2% (adequate, not perfect)Forward calorimeter around 50 - 200 mRad
• Luminosity SpectrumCore width to ~ 0.1%, tail level to 1%e+e- acolinearity (necessary but not sufficient!)
Luminosity, Energy, Polarization
Strategy document just completed
Jim Brau, Amsterdam, April 4, 2003
50
Luminosity Spectrum
Acolinearity problems• Energy, dL/dE both correlated
with position along bunch.• Measures boost, not s’• Energy imbalance, width
imbalance must be input• Independent real-time width
measurements?• 200 uRad kicks from disruption
alone (larger than target accuraccy)
• Many other offsets/degrees of freedom which must be input.
Putting together complete analysis including‘realistic’ mis-aligned machine decks from TRC report