Jet Reconstruction in ATLAS Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona, USA Peter Loch...
-
Upload
clyde-baldwin -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Jet Reconstruction in ATLAS Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona, USA Peter Loch...
Jet Reconstruction in Jet Reconstruction in ATLASATLAS
Jet Reconstruction in Jet Reconstruction in ATLASATLASPeter LochPeter Loch
University of ArizonaUniversity of Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, USATucson, Arizona, USA
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of ArizonaUniversity of Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, USATucson, Arizona, USA
e-mail: loch-at-physics.arizona.edue-mail: loch-at-physics.arizona.edu
Slide 2SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
OutlineOutlineOutlineOutline
Jets at LHCJets at LHCBrief overview on sources for jets and jet features at LHCBrief overview on sources for jets and jet features at LHC
Physics environment: Underlying Event and Pile-upPhysics environment: Underlying Event and Pile-up
Jet reconstruction in ATLASJet reconstruction in ATLASJet findersJet finders
Tower and cluster jetsTower and cluster jets
Jet calibration strategiesJet calibration strategies
In-situ calibrationIn-situ calibration
More from jets at LHCMore from jets at LHCJet reconstruction performanceJet reconstruction performance
Mass reconstruction and jet substructure analysisMass reconstruction and jet substructure analysis
Jet shapesJet shapes
Summary & OutlookSummary & Outlook
Slide 3SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Jets at LHCJets at LHCJets at LHCJets at LHCNew kinematic regime for jet New kinematic regime for jet physicsphysics
Jets can be much harderJets can be much harderJets get more narrow in general Jets get more narrow in general (kinematic effect ~(kinematic effect ~ααss))Higher energies to be contained Higher energies to be contained in calorimetersin calorimeters
Jet reconstruction Jet reconstruction challengingchallenging
Physics requirements typically Physics requirements typically 1% jet energy scale uncertainty1% jet energy scale uncertainty
top mass measurement in ttbar top mass measurement in ttbar LHC is a top factory!
hadronic final states in at the end hadronic final states in at the end of long decay chains in SUSYof long decay chains in SUSY
Quality takes timeQuality takes timePrevious experiments needed up Previous experiments needed up to 10 years of data taking to go to 10 years of data taking to go from ~4% down to ~1%from ~4% down to ~1%Can often not be achieved for all Can often not be achieved for all kinds of jets and in all physics kinds of jets and in all physics environmentsenvironments
W. Stirling, LHCC Workshop “Theory of LHC Processes” (1998)*annotation from J. Huston, Talk @ ATLAS Standard Model WG Meeting (Feb. 2004)
Slide 4SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Jets from QCD Jets from QCD ProcessesProcesses
Jets from QCD Jets from QCD ProcessesProcesses
Jets at low pT most likely Jets at low pT most likely produced by gluon fusionproduced by gluon fusion
Large phase space for radiationLarge phase space for radiationExpectation are multi-jet final states Expectation are multi-jet final states even for 2even for 2→→2 processes2 processes
More likely quark jets at higher More likely quark jets at higher pTpT
Less radiation (Sudakov Less radiation (Sudakov suppression)suppression)Less jets in eventsLess jets in eventsNarrower jets (again)Narrower jets (again)
Large kinematic rangeLarge kinematic rangepT range 10-5000 GeV/cpT range 10-5000 GeV/cDi-jet mass reach several TeV/cDi-jet mass reach several TeV/c22
Multitude of jet flavoursMultitude of jet flavoursExpect corresponding variety of jet Expect corresponding variety of jet shapes with possibly specific shapes with possibly specific calibrations!calibrations!
s = 1.8TeV
s =14 TeV
Slide 5SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Physics Environments @ Physics Environments @ LHCLHCPhysics Environments @ Physics Environments @ LHCLHC
Underlying eventUnderlying eventRefers to multiple interactions Refers to multiple interactions between the two colliding between the two colliding protonsprotonsTypically correlated with hard Typically correlated with hard scatterscatter
Increased activity Increased activity compared to Tevatroncompared to Tevatron
more phase spacemore phase space
CDF data (√s=1.8 TeV)CDF data (√s=1.8 TeV)
LHC prediction: x2.5 the activity measured at Tevatron!
pT leading jet (GeV)
Num
ber
char
ged
trac
ks in
tra
nsve
rse
regi
on
A.Moraes, HERA-LHC Workshop,DESY, March 2007
CDF data: Phys.Rev, D, 65 (2002)
Δφ
“toward”|Δφ|<60°
“away”|Δφ|>120°
“transverse”60°<|Δφ|<120°
“transverse”60°<|Δφ|<120°
leading jet
Rick Field’s (CDF) view on Rick Field’s (CDF) view on di-jet eventsdi-jet events
independent of independent of luminosity luminosity →→
present at day 1 at present at day 1 at LHC!LHC!
Slide 6SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Pile-upPile-upPile-upPile-upLarge pp total cross-section Large pp total cross-section (~75mb)(~75mb)
~23 “minimum bias” (soft to medium ~23 “minimum bias” (soft to medium hard) collisions between protons in the hard) collisions between protons in the same bunch in addition to triggered same bunch in addition to triggered hard scatterhard scatter
@ 10@ 103434 cm cm-2-2 s s-1-1 Poisson distributedPoisson distributed
Similar dynamics as UESimilar dynamics as UEStatistically independent Statistically independent
No correlation to hard scatter!No correlation to hard scatter!Generate lots of additional particles in Generate lots of additional particles in addition to the underlying eventaddition to the underlying event
~370 particles/unit rapidity per bunch ~370 particles/unit rapidity per bunch crossing (3700 within ATLAS)crossing (3700 within ATLAS)~1,800 charged tracks in ATLAS/bunch ~1,800 charged tracks in ATLAS/bunch crossingcrossing
High crossing rate at LHC (40 High crossing rate at LHC (40 MHz)MHz)
Calorimeter signals typically to slowCalorimeter signals typically to slowShort signal shaping, bi-polar shaping Short signal shaping, bi-polar shaping function (ATLAS)function (ATLAS)
Long signal history (~500-600 ns) Long signal history (~500-600 ns) generates “out-of-time” pile-upgenerates “out-of-time” pile-up
Canceling area Canceling area → → integrated effect 0integrated effect 0Careful, only true in limit of continuous Careful, only true in limit of continuous collisionscollisions
Can be treated as noise in calorimeterCan be treated as noise in calorimeterAsymmetric!Asymmetric!
Et ~ 58 GeV
Et ~ 81 GeV
no pile-up added
LHC design luminosity pile-up added
P. S
avard et al., AT
LAS
-CA
L-NO
084/1996
R = 0.7
Slide 7SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Experimenter’s View on JetsExperimenter’s View on JetsExperimenter’s View on JetsExperimenter’s View on Jets
physics reaction of interest (interaction or parton level)
lost soft tracks due to magnetic field
added tracks from underlying event
jet reconstruction algorithm efficiency
detector response characteristics (e/h ≠ 1)
electronic noise
dead material losses (front, cracks, transitions…)
pile-up noise from (off- and in-time) bunch crossings
detector signal inefficiencies (dead channels, HV…)
longitudinal energy leakage
calo signal definition (clustering, noise suppression ,…)
jet reconstruction algorithm efficiency
added tracks from in-time (same trigger) pile-up event
We like to factorize the calibration and corrections dealing with We like to factorize the calibration and corrections dealing with these effects as much as possible!these effects as much as possible!
Slide 8SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Theoretical Requirements for Jet Theoretical Requirements for Jet FindersFinders
Theoretical Requirements for Jet Theoretical Requirements for Jet FindersFinders
Infrared safetyInfrared safetyAbsence of additional Absence of additional radiation splits jetsradiation splits jets
Presence of radiation Presence of radiation merges jetsmerges jets
Collinear safetyCollinear safetySplit seedsSplit seeds
infrared sensitivity(soft gluon radiation merges jets)
collinear sensitivity (2)(signal split into two towers below threshold)
collinear sensitivity (1)(sensitive to Et ordering of seeds)
Slide 9SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Experimental Requirements for Jet Experimental Requirements for Jet FindersFinders
Experimental Requirements for Jet Experimental Requirements for Jet FindersFinders
Detector technology independenceDetector technology independenceMinimal contributions to spatial and energy resolutionMinimal contributions to spatial and energy resolutionInsignificant effects of detector environmentInsignificant effects of detector environment
NoiseNoiseDead materialDead materialCracks Cracks
Easy to calibrateEasy to calibrateWell…Well…
Environment independenceEnvironment independenceStability with changing luminosityStability with changing luminosityIdentify all physically interesting jets from energetic partons in Identify all physically interesting jets from energetic partons in pertubative QCD (pQCD)pertubative QCD (pQCD)High reconstruction efficiencyHigh reconstruction efficiency
ImplementationImplementationFully specifiedFully specified
All selections and other configurations knownAll selections and other configurations knownEfficient use of computing sourcesEfficient use of computing sources
Slide 10SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Popular Jet Algorithms in ATLASPopular Jet Algorithms in ATLASPopular Jet Algorithms in ATLASPopular Jet Algorithms in ATLASSeeded coneSeeded cone
Place cone with radius R Place cone with radius R around seedaround seed
pT > 1 GeVpT > 1 GeV
Collect all particles in coneCollect all particles in cone
Re-calculate energy and Re-calculate energy and direction of conedirection of cone
4-momentum recombination4-momentum recombination
Find more particle in new Find more particle in new conecone
Stop until no more particles to Stop until no more particles to be foundbe found
Stable solutionStable solution
Particles can be shared Particles can be shared between jets between jets
Is not infrared safeIs not infrared safeNeeds split & merge (50% Needs split & merge (50% threshold)threshold)
May miss signficant energyMay miss signficant energyDark jetsDark jets
Recursive recombination (kT)Recursive recombination (kT)Calculate for all particles Calculate for all particles ii and and pairs pairs ij ij ::
Combine any two pairs to jet if:Combine any two pairs to jet if:
Else remove Else remove ii from list from listIs a jetIs a jet
Calculate new combinationsCalculate new combinationsStop when all particles declared Stop when all particles declared jetsjets
Each particle is part of one jet Each particle is part of one jet only (exclusive assignment)only (exclusive assignment)
Infrared safeInfrared safe
22 2, , 2
2 22 2, , 2
2
min( , )
min( , )
ijij t i t j
ij ijt i t j
i i
Rd p p
D
yp p
D
d p
ij id d
Slide 11SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Jet Finders in ATLASJet Finders in ATLASJet Finders in ATLASJet Finders in ATLASAlternative applications:Alternative applications:
CDF mid-point, Cambridge/Aachen CDF mid-point, Cambridge/Aachen recursive recombination (0recursive recombination (0thth order kT), order kT), “optimal jet finder” (event shape fit)“optimal jet finder” (event shape fit)More options: move to More options: move to FastJetFastJet libraries libraries
CMS, theoryCMS, theory
No universal configuration or jet No universal configuration or jet finderfinder
Narrow jets Narrow jets W->jj in ttbar, some SUSYW->jj in ttbar, some SUSY
Wider jetsWider jetsInclusive jet cross-section, QCD Inclusive jet cross-section, QCD
N.G
od
bh
an
e, Je
tRec
Jun
e 2
00
6
AlgorithmAlgorithm RRconecone DD ClientsClients
Seeded ConeSeeded ConeEtSeed = 1 GeV, fEtSeed = 1 GeV, fS/MS/M = 0.5 = 0.5
0.40.4 W mass W mass spectroscopyspectroscopy, top , top physics, physics, SUSYSUSY
Kt (FastKt)Kt (FastKt) 0.40.4
Seeded ConeSeeded ConeEtSeed = 1 GeV, fEtSeed = 1 GeV, fS/MS/M = 0.5 = 0.5
0.70.7 QCD, jet QCD, jet cross-cross-sectionssectionsKt (FastKt)Kt (FastKt) 0.60.6 P.-A. Delsart, June 2006
mW
Slide 12SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
The ATLAS DetectorThe ATLAS DetectorThe ATLAS DetectorThe ATLAS Detector
Slide 13SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
ATLAS CalorimetersATLAS CalorimetersATLAS CalorimetersATLAS Calorimeters
Tile CalorimetersTile Calorimeters
Electromagnetic Liquid Argon
Calorimeters
Electromagnetic Liquid Argon
Calorimeters
Hadronic Liquid Argon EndCap CalorimetersHadronic Liquid Argon EndCap Calorimeters
Forward Liquid Argon Calorimeters
Forward Liquid Argon Calorimeters
Electromagnetic Calorimeters: Liquid Argon/Pb accordion structure; highly granular readout (~170,000 channels); 0.0025 ≤ Δη ≤ 0.05, 0.025 ≤ Δφ ≤ 0.1; 2-3 longitudinal samplings; ~24-26 X0 deep covers |η|<3.2, presampler up to |η|<1.8;
Central Hadronic Calorimeters Scintillator/Fe in tiled readout; Δη x Δφ = 0.1 x 0.1 3 longitudinal samplings, covers |η|<1.7;
EndCap Hadronic Calorimeters Liquid Argon/Cu parallel plate absorber structure; Δη x Δφ = 0.1 x 0.1 (1.5<|η|<2.5), Δη x Δφ = 0.2 x 0.2 (2.5<|η|<3.2); 4 samplings;
Forward Calorimeters Liquid Argon/Cu or W absorbers with tubular electrodes in non-projective geometry; Δη x Δφ ≈ 0.2 x 0.2 (3.2<|η|<4.9) 3 samplings;
η=1.475
η=1.8
η=3.2
Slide 14SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
ATLAS Calorimeter DetailsATLAS Calorimeter DetailsATLAS Calorimeter DetailsATLAS Calorimeter Details
FCal1
FCal2
FCal3
Cryostat walls(warm/cold)
to interactionvertex
p from LHC
Hadronic EndCap
(2 wheels)
ElectromagneticEndCap
Cu Shielding
Electromagnetic Barrel Module
total ~200,000 channels, with hadronic coverage ~10 absorption lengths in full acceptance (|η|<5) and a typical level of non-compensation e/h≈1.3-1.6;
Slide 15SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Calorimeter Signals: Calorimeter Signals: TowersTowersCalorimeter Signals: Calorimeter Signals: TowersTowers
Imposes regular grid view Imposes regular grid view on eventon event
ΔηΔη××ΔφΔφ = 0.1×0.1 = 0.1×0.1
Motivated by event EMotivated by event ETT flow flowNatural for trigger!Natural for trigger!
Calorimeter cell signals Calorimeter cell signals are summed up in tower are summed up in tower binsbins
No cell selection, all cells are No cell selection, all cells are includedincluded
Indiscriminatory signal sum Indiscriminatory signal sum includes cells without any includes cells without any true signal at alltrue signal at all
Sum typically includes Sum typically includes geometrical weightgeometrical weight
Towers have fixed Towers have fixed directiondirection
Massless four-momentum Massless four-momentum representationrepresentation
2
2cell
cell
cell cell
cellcell
E w E
Aw
2
2cell
cell
cell cell
cellcell
E w E
Aw
wcell
1.0
1.0
0.25 0.25
0.25 0.25
η
φ
wcell
1.0
1.0
0.25 0.25
0.25 0.25
η
φ
, , , , ,T x y zE E p p p p
projective cellsprojective cellsnon-projectivenon-projective
cellscells
Slide 16SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Calorimeter Signals: Calorimeter Signals:
Topological ClustersTopological Clusters
Calorimeter Signals: Calorimeter Signals:
Topological ClustersTopological ClustersAttempt to reconstruct particle Attempt to reconstruct particle showersshowers
Establish local signal correlations Establish local signal correlations in (neighbouring) cellsin (neighbouring) cells““energy blob” in 3-denergy blob” in 3-d
Growing volume algorithm Growing volume algorithm using seeds and signal using seeds and signal thresholdsthresholds
Primary seeds start clusterPrimary seeds start clusterSecondary seeds among Secondary seeds among neighbours control growthneighbours control growthBasic cell selection threshold Basic cell selection threshold suppresses noisesuppresses noiseAll thresholds use signal-over-noise All thresholds use signal-over-noise rather than signalrather than signal
Signal significance is above a Signal significance is above a constant (but complex) thresholdconstant (but complex) thresholdNote: smallest reliably measurable Note: smallest reliably measurable energy is changing with noise!energy is changing with noise!Avoids regional energy thresholds Avoids regional energy thresholds (lots of tuning)(lots of tuning)Uses experimentally accessible Uses experimentally accessible informationinformationGets the best out of the Gets the best out of the calorimeter! calorimeter!
Pile-up Noise in Calorimeter Cells S. M
enke, AT
LAS
Physics W
orkshop 07/2005
34 2 110 cm sL
Electronic Noise in Calorimeter Cells S. Menke, A
TLA
S P
hysics Workshop 07/2005
Slide 17SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Principle of Topological ClusteringPrinciple of Topological ClusteringPrinciple of Topological ClusteringPrinciple of Topological Clustering
η
φ
η
φ 1 1
111
1
1 1 1 1
1
1
1111
1
1
1
1 1 1
1
1
1
1
11111
1
1
1
11
1
1
2 2
22
2
2 2 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 2
2
3 3
333
3
3 3 3
3
3
3 3 3
4
4
4 4
4414
14
14
14 4
552
5 54
1 54
52
52
51
51
51
4cellnoisecell
E
2cellnoisecell
E
0cellnoisecell
E
Primary seeds
Secondary seeds
Basic threshold
Cluster splitting introduces geometrical weights!Cluster splitting introduces geometrical weights!
Slide 18SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Calorimeter Signals: It’s All In The Calorimeter Signals: It’s All In The Pictures…Pictures…
Calorimeter Signals: It’s All In The Calorimeter Signals: It’s All In The Pictures…Pictures…
Slide 19SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Tower Building(Δη×Δφ=0.1×0.1, non-discriminant)
CaloCells(em scale)
CaloTowers(em scale)
Calorimeter Jets(em scale)
Jet Finding(cone R=0.7,0.4; kt)
Jet Based Hadronic Calibration(“H1-style” cell weighting in jets etc.)
Calorimeter Jets(fully calibrated had scale)
Physics Jets(calibrated to particle level)
Jet Energy Scale Corrections(noise, pile-up, algorithm effects, etc.)
Refined Physics Jet(calibrated to interaction level)
In-situ Calibration(underlying event, physics environment, etc.)
ProtoJets(E>0,em scale)
Tower Noise Suppression(cancel E<0 towers by re-summation)
Tower Jets in ATLASTower Jets in ATLASTower Jets in ATLASTower Jets in ATLASSum up electromagnetic scale calorimeter cell Sum up electromagnetic scale calorimeter cell signals into towerssignals into towers
Fixed grid of Fixed grid of ΔΔηη x x ΔΔφφ = 0.1 x 0.1 = 0.1 x 0.1Non-discriminatory, no cell suppressionNon-discriminatory, no cell suppressionWorks well with pointing readout geometriesWorks well with pointing readout geometries
Larger cells split their signal between towers according to the Larger cells split their signal between towers according to the overlap area fractionoverlap area fraction
Tower noise suppressionTower noise suppressionSome towers have net negative signalsSome towers have net negative signalsApply “nearest neighbour tower recombination”Apply “nearest neighbour tower recombination”
Combine negative signal tower(s) with nearby positive signal Combine negative signal tower(s) with nearby positive signal towers until sum of signals > 0towers until sum of signals > 0 Remove towers with no nearby neighboursRemove towers with no nearby neighbours
Towers are “massless” pseudo-particlesTowers are “massless” pseudo-particlesFind jetsFind jets
Note: towers have signal on electromagnetic energy scaleNote: towers have signal on electromagnetic energy scaleCalibrate jetsCalibrate jets
Retrieve calorimeter cell signals in jetRetrieve calorimeter cell signals in jetApply signal weighting functions to these signalsApply signal weighting functions to these signalsRecalculate jet kinematics using these cell signalsRecalculate jet kinematics using these cell signals
Note: there are cells with negative signals!Note: there are cells with negative signals!Apply final correctionsApply final corrections
Slide 20SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Determination of Tower Jet Determination of Tower Jet CalibrationCalibration
Determination of Tower Jet Determination of Tower Jet CalibrationCalibration
Sample of fully simulated QCD di-jet events from hard Sample of fully simulated QCD di-jet events from hard scatter pT>17 GeV/c to kinematic limitscatter pT>17 GeV/c to kinematic limit
Electronic noise included in simulationElectronic noise included in simulation
Match reconstructed calorimeter jet with close-by particle Match reconstructed calorimeter jet with close-by particle jetjet
Both jets reconstructed with seeded cone R=0.7Both jets reconstructed with seeded cone R=0.7pTpTseedseed>1 GeV/c>1 GeV/cOverlap threshold 50%Overlap threshold 50%
Match exclusive: only accepted if only one jet close byMatch exclusive: only accepted if only one jet close byCalorimeter jets are based on tower signals in a grid of Calorimeter jets are based on tower signals in a grid of ΔΔηηxxΔΔηη = = 0.1x0.10.1x0.1
Access cell signals in jetAccess cell signals in jetH1 motivated cell signal weighting strategyH1 motivated cell signal weighting strategyDetermine cell signal weights in resolution optimization fit using truth Determine cell signal weights in resolution optimization fit using truth particle jet energy as normalizationparticle jet energy as normalization
Weights are function of cell location and cell signal densityWeights are function of cell location and cell signal densityDense signals – em, less dense signals hadronic
Re-calculate jet four-momentum using cell weightsRe-calculate jet four-momentum using cell weightsJet energy and direction changeJet energy and direction change
Slide 21SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Tower Jet PerformanceTower Jet PerformanceTower Jet PerformanceTower Jet Performance
Signal linearitySignal linearityRelative to matched MC Relative to matched MC truth jet!truth jet!
calibrated
49%σ = 3.4%E E[GeV]
S. Padhi, ATLAS Physics Workshop 07/2005
S. Padhi, ATLAS Physics Workshop 07/2005
Energy resolutionEnergy resolutionRelative to truthRelative to truth
2.35 2.55 10 13 GeV /ty p c
Kristin Lohwasser, September 2007
Slide 22SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Tower Jet Tower Jet UniformityUniformityTower Jet Tower Jet UniformityUniformity
Signal linearity as Signal linearity as function of jet directionfunction of jet direction
Cracks less visible for Cracks less visible for wider jets, as expectedwider jets, as expected
No strong jet energy No strong jet energy dependencedependence
Relative energy Relative energy resolution as function resolution as function of jet directionof jet direction
Cracks deteriorate signalCracks deteriorate signal
Relative effect stronger Relative effect stronger dependend on jet energy, dependend on jet energy, less on jet sizeless on jet size
Kristin Lohwasser, September 2007
Kristin Lohwasser, September 2007
Slide 23SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Cluster Jets Cluster Jets in ATLASin ATLAS
Cluster Jets Cluster Jets in ATLASin ATLAS
Attempt to factorizeAttempt to factorizeNoise suppressionNoise suppression
Noisy cells are removedNoisy cells are removed
Hadronic calibrationHadronic calibrationSignal weighting in cluster Signal weighting in cluster context, no jet biascontext, no jet bias
Dead material correctionsDead material correctionsLimited to vicinity of clustersLimited to vicinity of clustersCannot correct if no signal at Cannot correct if no signal at all nearbyall nearby
Out-of cluster correctionsOut-of cluster correctionsEfficiency correction for Efficiency correction for clustering algorithmclustering algorithm
Provides calibrated input Provides calibrated input to jet findingto jet finding
Relative mis-calibration Relative mis-calibration O(5%)O(5%)
Instead of O(30%)Instead of O(30%)
Clusters can be interpreted Clusters can be interpreted as massless pseudo-particlesas massless pseudo-particles
ATLAS convention, see later!ATLAS convention, see later!
Topological Clustering(includes noise suppression)
CaloCells(em scale)
CaloClusters(em scale)
Calorimeter Jets(em scale)
CaloClusters(em scale, classified)
Cluster Classification(identify em type clusters)
Jet Finding(cone R=0.7,0.4; kt)
Jet Finding(cone R=0.7,0.4; kt)
CaloClusters(locally calibrated had scale)
Hadronic Cluster Calibration(apply cell signal weighting dead material corrections, etc.)
Jet Based Hadronic Calibration(“H1-style” cell weighting in jets etc.)
Calorimeter Jets(fully calibrated had scale)
Jet Finding(cone R=0.7,0.4; kt)
Physics Jets(calibrated to particle level)
Jet Energy Scale Corrections(noise, pile-up, algorithm effects, etc.)
Refined Physics Jet(calibrated to interaction level)
In-situ Calibration(underlying event, physics environment, etc.)
Slide 24SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Why Cluster Jets At All?Why Cluster Jets At All?Why Cluster Jets At All?Why Cluster Jets At All?Reduce noise Reduce noise contributioncontribution
Fixed cone tower jetFixed cone tower jet
1
24
3
5
6
Fixed cone cluster jetFixed cone cluster jet
Iacopo Vivarelli, September 2006 Iacopo Vivarelli, September 2006
Slide 25SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Determination of cluster Determination of cluster calibrationcalibration
Determination of cluster Determination of cluster calibrationcalibration
ClassificationClassificationUse measurable cluster variables to determine if cluster looks Use measurable cluster variables to determine if cluster looks electromagnetic, hadronic, or noisyelectromagnetic, hadronic, or noisy
Cluster location (“early”) and average cell signal density useful to classify Cluster location (“early”) and average cell signal density useful to classify electromagnetic and hadronic clusterselectromagnetic and hadronic clustersNoisy clusters are typically seeded by negative signalNoisy clusters are typically seeded by negative signal
Often negative total cluster energy
Hadronic weightingHadronic weightingApply only to hadronic clustersApply only to hadronic clusters
Uses cluster direction, cluster energy, cell signal density and cell location Uses cluster direction, cluster energy, cell signal density and cell location (sampling layer) to find cell signal weights (sampling layer) to find cell signal weights
Dead material correctionsDead material correctionsApply to hadronic and electromagnetic clustersApply to hadronic and electromagnetic clusters
Uses DM corrections parametrized as function of cluster shapesUses DM corrections parametrized as function of cluster shapes
Out of cluster correctionsOut of cluster correctionsAccount for lost true signal due to clusteringAccount for lost true signal due to clustering
All corrections are derived from single pions and photonsAll corrections are derived from single pions and photonsDetailed simulations are needed for most of themDetailed simulations are needed for most of themCan all be benchmarked with test beam data! Can all be benchmarked with test beam data! Cannot correct for everything at cluster level Cannot correct for everything at cluster level
No signal, no correction!No signal, no correction!
Slide 26SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Cluster Jet Signal LinearityCluster Jet Signal LinearityCluster Jet Signal LinearityCluster Jet Signal Linearity
Flat response in Et and Flat response in Et and rapidityrapidity
Forward region problems under Forward region problems under studystudy
Missing ~8% jet energy Missing ~8% jet energy ~3% cluster mis-classification~3% cluster mis-classification
Cluster classified as em, but Cluster classified as em, but really is hadronicreally is hadronic
~3% signal efficiency~3% signal efficiencySignal of low energetic particles Signal of low energetic particles below cluster thresholdbelow cluster threshold
~2% electromagnetic calibration~2% electromagnetic calibrationEm clusters need own calibrationEm clusters need own calibration
Basic scale insufficient
Remember: calibration so far Remember: calibration so far comes from single particle!comes from single particle!
No jet context whatsoever!No jet context whatsoever!
Studies under way…Studies under way…We are now looking at topology We are now looking at topology based on clusters based on clusters Also started to look at jetsAlso started to look at jets
S.Menke/G. PospelovMarch 2007 T&P
S.Menke/G. PospelovMarch 2007 T&P
Slide 27SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Jet Energy Scale CorrectionsJet Energy Scale CorrectionsJet Energy Scale CorrectionsJet Energy Scale CorrectionsUse of kinematic Use of kinematic constraints in ppconstraints in pp
Photon/Z+jet pT balancePhoton/Z+jet pT balanceCentral value model Central value model dependent!dependent!
TopologyTopologyHard cuts on back-to-back no
problem at LHC!
Kinematic limit ~400 GeV/c Kinematic limit ~400 GeV/c pT(photon) for 1%pT(photon) for 1%
First shot at jet energy scale!First shot at jet energy scale!
W mass W mass Powerful but very special jetsPowerful but very special jets
W color-disconnectedNarrow jets
Di-jet balanceDi-jet balanceExtrapolation tool to high pT Extrapolation tool to high pT
Also detector uniformityAlso detector uniformity
Topology dependenceTopology dependence
Normalization strategyNormalization strategyMatch reconstructed pT Match reconstructed pT balance with particle level balance with particle level balancebalance
Unfold topology dependences Unfold topology dependences
Sigrid Jorgensen, September 2006
Slide 28SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Photon+JetPhoton+JetPhoton+JetPhoton+JetMissing Et Projection Missing Et Projection Fraction (MPF)Fraction (MPF)
Pioneered by DØPioneered by DØ
Low sensitivity to pile-upLow sensitivity to pile-up
No jet context neededNo jet context neededCan use clusters, towers, Can use clusters, towers, even cell signalseven cell signals
calo signals
calot t
tjetcalo
t
p p
pR
p
Dou
g S
chou
ten
, A
TL-
CO
M-P
HYS
-20
07
-05
7,S
ep
tem
ber
20
07
uncalibrated clustersuncalibrated clusters
Slide 29SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Jet Energy Scale From WJet Energy Scale From WJet Energy Scale From WJet Energy Scale From WChallenge: pile-up and W boostChallenge: pile-up and W boost
Pile-up can “improve” jet energy scale! Pile-up can “improve” jet energy scale!
W colour-disconnected from rest of eventW colour-disconnected from rest of eventCannot expect the same particle flow around jetCannot expect the same particle flow around jetNot straight forward to carry over corrections based on W mass to other jets at 1% levelNot straight forward to carry over corrections based on W mass to other jets at 1% level
P. Savard, P. Loch, CALOR97
η(W) ~1.8
34 2 110 cm sL
Slide 30SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Very High pT JetsVery High pT JetsVery High pT JetsVery High pT JetsReconstruction concern: Reconstruction concern: leakageleakage
Find indicators in jet signal Find indicators in jet signal to tag leakageto tag leakage
Late showering in Late showering in calorimetercalorimeter
Use muon spectrometer Use muon spectrometer hits behind jethits behind jet
No energy measurement, No energy measurement, but good tagbut good tag
Studies underway to Studies underway to validate jet energy scale validate jet energy scale at very high pTat very high pT
pT balance in systems with pT balance in systems with very high pT jet balancing very high pT jet balancing several lower energetic jetsseveral lower energetic jets
Frank P
aige, AT
LAS
T&
P W
eek February 2006
Slide 31SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Jet Finder Efficiencies in ATLASJet Finder Efficiencies in ATLASJet Finder Efficiencies in ATLASJet Finder Efficiencies in ATLASEfficiencyEfficiency
Only free parameter: Only free parameter: matching radius matching radius RRmm
No kinematics matching!No kinematics matching!
PurityPurityRelates to Relates to fake ratefake rate
# matches reconstructed and truth jets( )
# truth jets
( )
m
jetsm m
jetstruth
R
N R
N
# matches reconstructed and truth jets( )
# reconstructed jets
( )1 ( )
m
jetsm m
jets fake mreco
R
RN R
N
Jets in VBF!Jets in VBF!
Martin Schmitz, September 2007
Jets in VBF!Jets in VBF!
Martin Schmitz, September 2007
Slide 32SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Pile-Up in Clone Cluster Pile-Up in Clone Cluster JetsJetsPile-Up in Clone Cluster Pile-Up in Clone Cluster JetsJets
Expect cluster to suppress Expect cluster to suppress noisenoise
Works for pile-up as wellWorks for pile-up as wellFlucutations can be suppressed if Flucutations can be suppressed if correct noise RMS used in cluster correct noise RMS used in cluster finderfinder
Cluster noise cuts are symmetric!Cluster noise cuts are symmetric!
Some energy offset observedSome energy offset observedPile-up is asymmetricPile-up is asymmetricBaseline larger for correct RMSBaseline larger for correct RMS
Bias toward positive signals by Bias toward positive signals by noise selectionnoise selection
34 2 10.8 10 cm s
34 2 10.8 10 cm s
Et Pile-up in R=0.2 cone
Doug Schouten, ATL-COM-PHYS-2007-057,September 2007
34 2 10.8 10 cm s
Dou
g S
chou
ten
, A
TL-
CO
M-P
HYS
-20
07
-05
7,S
ep
tem
ber
20
07
Slide 33SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Jet MassesJet MassesJet MassesJet MassesGained interest at LHCGained interest at LHC
Heavily boosted top decaysHeavily boosted top decaysAll decay products reconstructed in All decay products reconstructed in one jetone jet
Jet mass one observable indicating Jet mass one observable indicating top decaytop decay
Jet substructure also sensitive to Jet substructure also sensitive to source!source!
Mass measurement challengingMass measurement challengingParticle jet level mass is referenceParticle jet level mass is reference
Simulations only!Simulations only!
Mass of calorimeter jet is affected Mass of calorimeter jet is affected by shower spreadsby shower spreads
Enters: signal definition dependence, Enters: signal definition dependence, cluster shapes, noise,…cluster shapes, noise,…
No significant attempt at Tevatron No significant attempt at Tevatron or elsewhereor elsewhere relative mass difference
cluster jets
cluster jets
cluster jets
tower jets
tower jets
tower jets
0.8y
1.7 2.5y
3.7 4.2y PL
& C
hia
ra P
ale
ari
, Post
er
@ S
LAC
ATLA
S W
ork
shop
, A
ug
ust
20
07
Slide 34SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Mass Reconstruction SensitivitiesMass Reconstruction SensitivitiesMass Reconstruction SensitivitiesMass Reconstruction Sensitivities
Contribution from low energetic particles Contribution from low energetic particles lostlost
Dead material and magnetic fieldDead material and magnetic field
Overall effect depends on signal definitionOverall effect depends on signal definition
How about effect on mass?How about effect on mass?
Exercise: remove particles below pT Exercise: remove particles below pT threshold from jet and re-calculate massthreshold from jet and re-calculate mass
Remember: towers are not calibratedRemember: towers are not calibratedMore severe effect of cut in tower jetsMore severe effect of cut in tower jets
Clusters are calibratedClusters are calibratedMore similar to particle selection in jetsMore similar to particle selection in jets
Slide 35SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Mass Mass SensitivitSensitivity y
Mass Mass SensitivitSensitivity y
change o
f m
ass
log10(least biased reconstructed mass/GeV)
QCD kT jets, D = 0.6
Slide 36SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Jet SubstructureJet SubstructureJet SubstructureJet SubstructureMass too complex?Mass too complex?
Can be too sensitive to small Can be too sensitive to small signals in jetssignals in jets
UE, pile-up, other noiseUE, pile-up, other noise
Use YSplitter to detect Use YSplitter to detect substructuresubstructure
Determines scale y for splitting Determines scale y for splitting a giving jet into 2,3,… subjects, a giving jet into 2,3,… subjects, as determined by yas determined by ycutcut, from, from
More stable as only significant More stable as only significant constituents are used ?constituents are used ?At least additional information At least additional information to massto mass
Other option:Other option:Look at mass of 2…n hardest Look at mass of 2…n hardest constituents (Ben Lillie,ANL) constituents (Ben Lillie,ANL)
jetcut Ty y p
J. B
utt
erw
ort
h e
t. a
l,, A
TL-
CO
M-P
HYS
-20
07
-07
7,O
ctob
er
20
07
Not very sensitive to calorimeter signal details!
Slide 37SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Jet Shapes (1)Jet Shapes (1)Jet Shapes (1)Jet Shapes (1)11stst question: any question: any relation between relation between number of particles, number of particles, towers, clusters in towers, clusters in jets?jets?
Most interesting for kTMost interesting for kTD = 0.6 hereD = 0.6 here
Look at matching Look at matching callorimeter/truth jetscallorimeter/truth jetsNote: not the most Note: not the most important variable!important variable!
We already expect We already expect change of “jet picture” change of “jet picture” by detector signal by detector signal definitiondefinitionHints on resolution Hints on resolution power for jet shape power for jet shape variables and mass variables and mass
Slide 38SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Jet Shapes (2)Jet Shapes (2)Jet Shapes (2)Jet Shapes (2)We expected clusters to We expected clusters to represent indivdual particlesrepresent indivdual particles
Cannot be perfect in busy jet Cannot be perfect in busy jet environment!environment!
Shower overlap in finite calorimeter Shower overlap in finite calorimeter granularitygranularity
Some resolution power, thoughSome resolution power, thoughMuch better than for tower jets!Much better than for tower jets!
~1.6:1 particles:clusters in central ~1.6:1 particles:clusters in central regionregion
~1:1 in endcap region~1:1 in endcap regionBest match of readout granularity, Best match of readout granularity, shower size and jet particle energy flowshower size and jet particle energy flow
Happy coincidence, not a design Happy coincidence, not a design feature of the ATLAS calorimeter!feature of the ATLAS calorimeter!
Slide 39SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Jet Shapes (3)Jet Shapes (3)Jet Shapes (3)Jet Shapes (3)
Jet densityJet densityCalculate energy outside Calculate energy outside of cone R = 0.3 as function of cone R = 0.3 as function of pT and directionof pT and direction
Classic Tevatron Classic Tevatron measurementmeasurement
Experimental indication of Experimental indication of transition from (low pT) transition from (low pT) gluon to (high pT) quark gluon to (high pT) quark jets jets
Example: kT jets in Example: kT jets in QCDQCD
D = 0.6D = 0.6
cluster jetstower jetshadron jets
Fract
ion o
f energ
y o
uts
ide c
one a
round jet
axis
(R
cone=
0.3
)
log10(pTjet/GeV)
0.8y
1.7 2.5y
3.7 4.2y
PL &
Ch
iara
Pale
ari, P
oste
r @ S
LAC
ATLA
S W
orksh
op
, Au
gu
st 20
07
Slide 40SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
SummarySummarySummarySummaryGeneralGeneral
Everything you have seen here from ATLAS is based on Everything you have seen here from ATLAS is based on simulations and thus very preliminarysimulations and thus very preliminary
Real data can bring us surprises (good and bad)Real data can bring us surprises (good and bad)
Jet signalsJet signalsCluster signal (~200/event) good basis for jet finding in physics Cluster signal (~200/event) good basis for jet finding in physics analysis contextanalysis context
Final jet energy scale corrections depend on analysis choices Final jet energy scale corrections depend on analysis choices for jet finders, -configurations, selected event topologies…for jet finders, -configurations, selected event topologies…
What we can get from jetsWhat we can get from jetsStrong interest to go beyond Tevatron jetsStrong interest to go beyond Tevatron jets
Jet masses and substructure analysis of great interest for Jet masses and substructure analysis of great interest for boosted heavy particle decaysboosted heavy particle decays
Jet shapes can test basic jet formation dynamics ??Jet shapes can test basic jet formation dynamics ??
New dimension added: jet signal shapes in calorimeters can New dimension added: jet signal shapes in calorimeters can improve calibration jet by jetimprove calibration jet by jet
Slide 41SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
OutlookOutlookOutlookOutlookRefined jet calibrationRefined jet calibration
Use calorimeter jet signal shapesUse calorimeter jet signal shapesWe used cluster shapes already, now look at cluster We used cluster shapes already, now look at cluster distribution in jetdistribution in jet
Use inner detector tracksUse inner detector tracksLarge momentum fraction of jet in tracks indicates a very Large momentum fraction of jet in tracks indicates a very hadronic jet, i.e. more correctionshadronic jet, i.e. more corrections
Jet originsJet originsUse inner detector tracks and vertices to separate jets Use inner detector tracks and vertices to separate jets from hard scattering from jets from UE and/or pile-up (A. from hard scattering from jets from UE and/or pile-up (A. Schwartzman)Schwartzman)
All this has not been used much in the past, All this has not been used much in the past, but we have to address a 1% systematic but we have to address a 1% systematic error requirement somehow!error requirement somehow!We are more than ready for data!We are more than ready for data!
Backup SlidesBackup SlidesBackup SlidesBackup Slides
Slide 43SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
JES error very quickly JES error very quickly systematically dominatedsystematically dominated
Large statistics in Large statistics in unexplored kinematic range unexplored kinematic range already at low luminosityalready at low luminosity
Calibration channels Calibration channels quickly accessiblequickly accessible
pT balancepT balancePhoton + jet(s) Photon + jet(s) Z+jet(s) laterZ+jet(s) later
Mass spectroscopyMass spectroscopyW->jj in ttbarW->jj in ttbar
I nclusive J et
Production
~101.3×10-6pt > 3 TeV
~10310-4pt > 2 TeV
~1060.1pt > 1 TeV
~109100pt > 200 GeV
~1070.8tt
~1071.5Z → e+e―
~10815W → eν
Evts/year ( =10 fb- 1)
σ (nb)Process
I nclusive J et
Production
~101.3×10-6pt > 3 TeV
~10310-4pt > 2 TeV
~1060.1pt > 1 TeV
~109100pt > 200 GeV
~1070.8tt
~1071.5Z → e+e―
~10815W → eν
Evts/year ( =10 fb- 1)
σ (nb)Process
g
q γ
qg
q γ
q
Dominant direct photon production gives access to gluon structure at high x (~0.0001-0.2) (precision ?)
Jet Energy Scale Jet Energy Scale (JES)(JES)
Jet Energy Scale Jet Energy Scale (JES)(JES)
40 400 GeVTp c 50 200 GeVZ
Tp c
Slide 44SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
Measurements with JetsMeasurements with JetsMeasurements with JetsMeasurements with Jets
sensitivity to compositeness scale Λ up to 40 TeV @ 300 fb-1 (all quarks are composites)
CompositenessCompositeness
Deviation from SM
PDFsPDFsdi-jet cross section and properties (Et,η1,η2) constrain parton distribution function
s
( ) 10%s zM
just from cross-section, can be improved by 3/2 jet ratio, but no competition for LEP/HERA!
Strong CouplingStrong Coupling
test of QCD at very small scale ( )s 0.08
Slide 45SeminarSeminar
October 31, 2007October 31, 2007
RALRAL
Peter LochPeter Loch
University of University of ArizonaArizona
““H1” Style Cell Signal Weighting H1” Style Cell Signal Weighting in ATLASin ATLAS
““H1” Style Cell Signal Weighting H1” Style Cell Signal Weighting in ATLASin ATLAS
Fit constraint:Fit constraint:
Jet four-momentum calculation after fit Jet four-momentum calculation after fit
Final corrections for residual signal non-linearitiesFinal corrections for residual signal non-linearitiesAlgorithm dependenciesAlgorithm dependencies
Available for seeded cone R=0.4, kT D=0.4, D=0.6Available for seeded cone R=0.4, kT D=0.4, D=0.6
Signal dependencies (cluster/tower)Signal dependencies (cluster/tower)
1
, ( , ) , , with cells
Njet jetreco reco i i i i i i
i
E p w X E p E p
2
1 1
( , ) 0jets cells
N Njet
i i i truthj i
w X E Ew
““masslesmassless pseudo-s pseudo-particles”particles”
, ( , )jet jet jeta s t reco truthf p E E