Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch...
Transcript of Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch...
![Page 1: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF
Warren Andrews
Almost entirely from “Determination of the Jet Energy Scale at the Collider Detector at Fermilab” Bhatti et al., http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/0510047
![Page 2: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
What is a Jet?collisions (at CDF) ( collisions at CMS)
Hard Scatter: inelastic parton - parton (quark or gluon) scatter
Partons in final state fragment into collimated jets
Fragmentation from strong interactions--like color confinement
Jets because confinement says hard radiation is rare, but soft is common
pp pp
![Page 3: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Example of 4 jet event at Aleph detector at LEP
![Page 4: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
simulated HW → Jets + eν event(somewhere on fnal.gov)
![Page 5: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
CDF detector essentials and scale
![Page 6: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Must know pµ of hard scatter parton
Many parameters depend on energy of jets:− σ for jet production,
Mtop, Mhiggs
Why are jets important?
Examples:
− → 2Wb → 4jets+l ν
− H → jets
− Dijet resonances of new particles
tt
![Page 7: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Jet Reconstruction
Goal is to determine the pT of hard scatter parton (pT
parton) from detector signal: pTjet
Jets are observed as clustered energy depositions in calorimeters. Must correct:
Purpose of talk is to explain these corrections
![Page 8: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
All corrections are pT, R dependantLast 3 corrected from simulation, first 2 mostly from data
![Page 9: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Jet Clustering Algorithm
Jets are clustered (made) from calorimeter towers (EM+HA) with ET > 1GeV
Cone size--radius: R =
Algorithm also run on stable final state particles from simulation
( ) ( )22 φη ∆+∆
![Page 10: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Correct non-uniform η response of detector due to cracks, plug (end-caps), etc.
How: Dijet balancing: dijets required to be back to back in r-φ plane (0.2 < |ηtrigger| < 0.6)
Result: systematic uncertainty of ~1-2%
Cη
![Page 11: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Number of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity:
− ~1 to 3 for 2001-2004, L≈0.5*1032 cm-2s-1
− Run II until to 2010, currently L≈1.5*1032 cm-2s-1
Number of reconstructed primary z-vertices (intersection of particle tracks with beam line) is best estimate of number interactions
Efficiency of vertex finding algorithm depends on track multiplicity, determines uncertainty
CMI : Multiple Interactions
![Page 12: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
CMI : Results
R jet0.4 500.7 1501.0 300
CMI(MeV)
Correction per interaction per jet:
![Page 13: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
CAbs : Jet Energy Scale
Correct for all detector effects (with CMI and Cη)
Compare physics simulation results (pTparticle) to
detector simulation (pTjet) event by event
− Calorimeter simulation optimized for single particle response
− physics simulation creates spread in pT
![Page 14: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14R jet = 0.4
pTparticle - pT
jet biased positive due to energy loss in detector
modeled as double Gaussian
CAbs determined from likelihood fit of product of all particle jets (not just pT
particle/pTjet)
![Page 15: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Uncertainties on single particle response propagate
Differences between data and simulations:
− Calorimeter
− Fragmentation
Uncertainty of CAbs
![Page 16: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
CUE : Underlying Event
Originates from partons other than the partons in the hard scatter of interest:
− Initial state gluon radiation, spectator partons
UE effects are uncorrelated with scatter partons
− Independent of jet position, energy (almost)
![Page 17: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Cooc : Out of Cone
Energy from the hard scatter parton escapes jet cone
− Final state gluon radiation, fragmentation, low pT
particles bending in B field
Both CUE and Cooc are corrected simultaneously from simulation at particle generator level independent of CDF detector (no CAbs effects)
![Page 18: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
CUE and Cooc correctionsSame method as CAbs, but use pT
parton - pTparticle now instead of
pTparticle - pT
jet
At small cone sizes the OOC losses dominate over the energy increase due to UE, but at large cone sizes the extra energy from the UE is larger than the OOC losses.
![Page 19: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Systematic uncertainty determined from comparison with data
Cone Size0.4 0.41.1 0.72.2 1.0
CUE (GeV)
CUE and Cooc results
![Page 20: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Validation of the JES Determination
Compare to data samples:
− γ-jet: photon energy accurately measured, background from π0, η→ γγ
− Z-jet: nearly free from background, smaller statistics
agrees with MC to 3%
![Page 21: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
γ-jet Validation results
After all corrections, data and MC agree to within 2%
![Page 22: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Systematic Uncertainties on JES
Mostly arise from modeling of jets by MC and from knowledge of single particle response (reconstruction)
For pT > 60GeV largest contribution is from CAbs
which is limited by response to charged hadrons
Improvements via better simulations, more data
![Page 23: Jet Energy Scale Determination at CDF · 2007. 11. 29. · 11 zNumber of pp interactions per bunch crossing depends linearly on instantaneous luminosity: −~1 to 3 for 2001-2004,](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022071402/60ee068807052577950c55b3/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Conclusions: Jets, Jets, and Jets
Jet energy scale important to many parameters (SM and new physics)
Correct from detector signal to parton pT via:
Corrections rely heavily on MC, cross-checked to data