Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield
description
Transcript of Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield
Jeremy DazzoChris HunterClint Nesmith
Amy OffillRichie RobinsonChris Stanfield
Victoria Thomason
Data Integrity ProfessionalsData Integrity Professionals
Entity Relationship Model
Logical Database Design
Technical Feasibility (Moderate)• Familiarity with Business Processes (High)
o Team (Moderate) Team is knowledgeable of the as-is system and has
gained even more knowledge through interviews with the Housing directors
o Client (High) Students will be able to submit their technical
problems to Housing’s database. The maintenance director will be able to view
work orders and locate housing networking devices.
Technical Feasibility (cont.)o Familiarity with Technology (Moderate) Team (High)
• Hardware All members have used personal computers,
servers, and PDAs.• Software (Moderate to high)
Windows OS Dreamweaver, VS, Excel, PowerPoint, Access,
Visio, Project, Windows Server 2003 and XP, and Firefox used to create and implement the future system
The members have a moderate- to high-level knowledge of multiple computer languages
Technical Feasibility (cont.)
o Familiarity with Technology (Moderate) (cont.) Client (Moderate)• Users of the “to-be” system:o Computer techso Housing staffo On-campus students
Project Size: (Moderate)• 3 computer techs• 2 months of design and implementation• Relatively low development costs• Low financial risk
Cost Benefit Analysis
Organizational Feasibility (Moderate)o Project Champion
Richard Robinson, Assistant IT Directoro Organizational Management
Melanie Peel, Louisiana Tech Housing Director Annie Jantz, Room Assignments CoordinatoroSystems Users Main users• Computer Techs• On-Campus Students• Maintenance Director• Housing Staff
oOther stakeholders Parents of on-campus students
Size Risk Assessment
Technical Risk Assessment
Technical Risk Assessment (cont.)
Structure Risk Assessment
Total Risk
Risk Reduction
Adjustments:
Size Risk Adjustments: None
Technical Risk Adjustments: Project team may need to review software required to build the system.
Structure Risk Adjustments: Basing new web-based entry forms on current work order forms may assist in the transition to the new system, reducing risk.