Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield

14
Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield Victoria Thomason Data Integrity Data Integrity Professionals Professionals

description

Data Integrity Professionals. Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield Victoria Thomason. Entity Relationship Model. Logical Database Design. Familiarity with Business Processes (High) Team (Moderate) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield

Page 1: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield

Jeremy DazzoChris HunterClint Nesmith

Amy OffillRichie RobinsonChris Stanfield

Victoria Thomason

Data Integrity ProfessionalsData Integrity Professionals

Page 2: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield

Entity Relationship Model

Page 3: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield

Logical Database Design

Page 4: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield

Technical Feasibility (Moderate)• Familiarity with Business Processes (High)

o Team (Moderate) Team is knowledgeable of the as-is system and has

gained even more knowledge through interviews with the Housing directors

o Client (High) Students will be able to submit their technical

problems to Housing’s database. The maintenance director will be able to view

work orders and locate housing networking devices.

Page 5: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield

Technical Feasibility (cont.)o Familiarity with Technology (Moderate) Team (High)

• Hardware All members have used personal computers,

servers, and PDAs.• Software (Moderate to high)

Windows OS Dreamweaver, VS, Excel, PowerPoint, Access,

Visio, Project, Windows Server 2003 and XP, and Firefox used to create and implement the future system

The members have a moderate- to high-level knowledge of multiple computer languages

Page 6: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield

Technical Feasibility (cont.)

o Familiarity with Technology (Moderate) (cont.) Client (Moderate)• Users of the “to-be” system:o Computer techso Housing staffo On-campus students

Project Size: (Moderate)• 3 computer techs• 2 months of design and implementation• Relatively low development costs• Low financial risk

Page 7: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield

Cost Benefit Analysis

 

Page 8: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield

Organizational Feasibility (Moderate)o Project Champion

Richard Robinson, Assistant IT Directoro Organizational Management

Melanie Peel, Louisiana Tech Housing Director Annie Jantz, Room Assignments CoordinatoroSystems Users Main users• Computer Techs• On-Campus Students• Maintenance Director• Housing Staff

oOther stakeholders Parents of on-campus students

Page 9: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield

Size Risk Assessment

Page 10: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield

Technical Risk Assessment

Page 11: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield

Technical Risk Assessment (cont.)

Page 12: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield

Structure Risk Assessment

Page 13: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield

Total Risk

Page 14: Jeremy Dazzo Chris Hunter Clint Nesmith Amy Offill Richie Robinson Chris Stanfield

Risk Reduction

Adjustments:

Size Risk Adjustments: None

Technical Risk Adjustments: Project team may need to review software required to build the system.

Structure Risk Adjustments: Basing new web-based entry forms on current work order forms may assist in the transition to the new system, reducing risk.