JEE2012 Report

517
1 SECTION 1 Introduction: The Indian Institutes of Technology Joint Entrance Examination, popularly known as IIT‐JEE, is jointly conducted by IIT Bombay, IIT Delhi, IIT Guwahati, IIT Kanpur, IIT Kharagpur, IIT Madras and IIT Roorkee. This is a 50 plus years old examination; more than 500 thousand applicants compete for about 9600 seats in 16 Indian Institutes of Technology located in different parts of the country and Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad. Joint Admission Board is the body which is responsible for framing all the polices covering: eligibility for writing the examination, minimum marks one has to score in aggregate or at subject level to qualify, eligibility criterion, number of attempts one can make, mode of counseling and number of rounds of seat allocation. The members of the JAB‐2012 are listed below: 1.1 JOINT ADMISSIONS BOARD (JAB‐2012) No. Name Position 1. Prof. Devang V Khakhar Prof. Avinash Mahajan Prof. Tom Mathew Director,IIT Bombay Chairman, JEE, IIT Bombay Vice Chairman, JEE, IIT Bombay 2. Prof. M Chakraborty Director, IIT Bhubaneswar 3. Prof. Surendra Prasad Prof. R.K.Shevgaonkar Prof. G.B. Reddy Prof. Rajesh Khanna Prof. Narayanan Kurur Chairman, JAB‐2012 & Director, IIT Delhi upto October 2011 Chairman, JAB‐2012 & Director, IIT Delhi from October 2011 Organizing Chairman IIT‐JEE 2012 , IIT Delhi Org. Vice Chairman, JEE, IIT Delhi Org. Vice Chairman, JEE, IIT Delhi 4. Prof. Sudhir Jain Director, IIT Gandhinagar 5. Prof. Gautam Barua Prof. Bishnupada Mondal Prof. S. Senthilvelan Director, IIT Guwahati Chairman, JEE, IIT Guwahati Vice Chairman, JEE, IIT Guwahati 6. Prof. U B Desai Director, IIT Hyderabad 7. Prof. P Mathur Director, IIT Indore 8. Prof. S G Dhande Prof. S.K. Choudhury Prof. Rajesh Srivastava Director, IIT Kanpur Chairman, JEE, IIT Kanpur Vice Chairman, JEE, IIT Kanpur 9. Prof. D Acharya Prof. A. R. Mohanty Prof. K. U. M. Rao Director, IIT Kharagpur Chairman, JEE, IIT Kharagpur Vice Chairman, JEE, IIT Kharagpur 10. Prof. B. Ramamurthi Prof. Arindama Singh Prof. R. Sarathi Director, IIT Madras Chairman, JEE, IIT Madras Vice Chairman, JEE, IIT Madras 11. Prof. T A Gonsalves Director, IIT Mandi 12. Prof. Anil Bhowmick Director, IIT Patna 13. Prof. P K Kalra Director, IIT Rajasthan 14. Prof. S C Saxena Prof. P.Banerji Prof. U P Singh Prof. M.L. Sharma Director, IIT Roorkee Director, IIT Roorkee Chairman, JEE, IIT Roorkee Vice Chairman, JEE, IIT Roorkee 15. Prof. M K Surappa Director, IIT Ropar

TAGS:

Transcript of JEE2012 Report

  • 1

    SECTION1Introduction:The Indian Institutes of Technology Joint Entrance Examination, popularly known as IITJEE, is jointlyconductedbyIITBombay,IITDelhi,IITGuwahati,IITKanpur,IITKharagpur,IITMadrasandIITRoorkee.Thisisa50plusyearsoldexamination;morethan500thousandapplicantscompeteforabout9600seatsin16Indian Institutes of Technology located in different parts of the country and Indian School of Mines,Dhanbad.JointAdmissionBoard is thebodywhich is responsible for framingall thepolices covering: eligibility forwriting the examination, minimum marks one has to score in aggregate or at subject level to qualify,eligibilitycriterion,numberofattemptsonecanmake,modeofcounselingandnumberofroundsofseatallocation.ThemembersoftheJAB2012arelistedbelow:1.1 JOINTADMISSIONSBOARD(JAB2012)No. Name Position1. Prof.DevangVKhakhar

    Prof.AvinashMahajanProf.TomMathew

    Director,IITBombayChairman,JEE,IITBombayViceChairman,JEE,IITBombay

    2. Prof.MChakraborty Director,IITBhubaneswar3. Prof.SurendraPrasad

    Prof.R.K.ShevgaonkarProf.G.B.ReddyProf.RajeshKhannaProf.NarayananKurur

    Chairman,JAB2012&Director,IITDelhiuptoOctober2011Chairman,JAB2012&Director,IITDelhifromOctober2011OrganizingChairmanIITJEE2012,IITDelhiOrg.ViceChairman,JEE,IITDelhiOrg.ViceChairman,JEE,IITDelhi

    4. Prof.SudhirJain Director,IITGandhinagar5. Prof.GautamBarua

    Prof.BishnupadaMondalProf.S.Senthilvelan

    Director,IITGuwahatiChairman,JEE,IITGuwahatiViceChairman,JEE,IITGuwahati

    6. Prof.UBDesai Director,IITHyderabad7. Prof.PMathur Director,IITIndore8. Prof.SGDhande

    Prof.S.K.ChoudhuryProf.RajeshSrivastava

    Director,IITKanpurChairman,JEE,IITKanpurViceChairman,JEE,IITKanpur

    9. Prof.DAcharyaProf.A.R.MohantyProf.K.U.M.Rao

    Director,IITKharagpurChairman,JEE,IITKharagpurViceChairman,JEE,IITKharagpur

    10. Prof.B.RamamurthiProf.ArindamaSinghProf.R.Sarathi

    Director,IITMadrasChairman,JEE,IITMadrasViceChairman,JEE,IITMadras

    11. Prof.TAGonsalves Director,IITMandi12. Prof.AnilBhowmick Director,IITPatna13. Prof.PKKalra Director,IITRajasthan14. Prof.SCSaxena

    Prof.P.BanerjiProf.UPSinghProf.M.L.Sharma

    Director,IITRoorkeeDirector,IITRoorkeeChairman,JEE,IITRoorkeeViceChairman,JEE,IITRoorkee

    15. Prof.MKSurappa Director,IITRopar

  • 2

    No. Name Position16. Prof.T.Kumar

    Prof.D.C.PanigrahiProf.M.JawedProf.G.Udayabhanu

    Director,ISMDhanbadDirector,ISMDhanbadChairman,JEE,ISMDhanbadViceChairman,JEE,ISMDhanbad

    17. Prof.KPSinghProf.J.N.SinhaProf.DhananjaiPandeyProf.P.K.JainProf.S.H.Hasan

    Director,ITBHUDirector,ITBHUDirector,ITBHUChairman,JEE,ITBHUViceChairman,JEE,ITBHU

    1.2 ScheduledmeetingofJABandmajorpolicychangesapprovedTheJointAdmissionsBoard(JAB2012)metfivetimesincludingthefirstmeeting,whichwasthecombinedmeetingofJAB2011andJAB2012.

    a. FirstJABmeeting: August26,2011atIITDelhi(Prof.S.G.Dhande,Director IITKanpurandChairman JAB2011 initiallychaired themeetingwhileProf.S.K.Choudhury,OrganizingChairman,JEE2011presentedstatisticalreportandanalysisbasedon factsand figuresrelated JEE2011 to JAB.After thepresentationbyProf.Choudhurywasover,Prof. Dhande handed over the charge of the Joint Admissions Board to Prof. Surendra PrasadDirector,IITDelhi,whobecametheChairmanofJAB2012.Prof.SurendraPrasadintroducedProf.G.B.ReddyastheOrganizingChairmanofIITJEE2010andrequestedhimtopresenttheagendaitemsrelatedpolicy issuesforconducting IITJEE2012.Prof,G.B.Reddythenpresentedtheagenda itemsandalsothetimelinefortheconductingIITJEE2012.)

    b. SecondJABmeeting: October18,2011atIITDelhic. ThirdJABmeeting: February23,2012atIITDelhid. FourthJABmeeting: June23,2012atIITDelhie. FifthJABmeeting: August5,2012atIITDelhi

    InthefirstmeetingtheBoardmadethefollowingpolicydecisions:

    1. ChangeofName:JABdecidedtochangethenameoftheJointEntranceExamination(JEE)asIndianInstitutes TechnologyJoint Entrance Examination and refer it as IITJEE followed by the year inwhichitisheld.

    2. DateofExamination: JABdecidedtoconduct IITJEE2012on8thApril2012.Theexaminationwillconsistoftwopaperofthreehoursdurationeach.

    3. ConversionofVacantPDseatsintononPDseatsofrespectivecategoriesItwas observed that during the past few years several seatsmeant for PD category candidatesremainunfilled(afterpreparatorycourseallotment).ItwasresolvedthatsuchunfilledPDseatsafterpreparatoryallocationwouldbeconvertedtotherespectivecategories.

    4. Pencil/PenbubbleshadingofORSTheJIC2011decisiontorecommendpenfillingoftheORSwasconsideredandapproved.Itwasalsodecided todesign theORS in suchway that candidatescan takehomea copyofhis/heranswersfromtheexaminationroom.

    5. DisplayofORSimagesItwasdecidedthatthepracticestarted in2011ofcandidatesbeingshownthe imageoftheirORSwouldbecontinued.Itwasresolvedthatthisfacilitywouldstartafewdaysafterresultdeclarationandlasttillafewdaysbeforethefirstroundofseatallotment

  • 3

    6. JABmeetingsnumberingschemeItwasdecided toadoptauniquenumberingsystem toreferevery JABmeeting.Forexample, thesecondmeetingofJAB2011wouldbeJAB.1.2

    7. Specialprovisionsforblindcandidates:Theprovisionforamanuensiswasrecommended.Whereverpossible,detailedexplanationofthefiguresaccompanyingquestionswillbeprovided.Ifitcannotbesupplied, exemption from attempting such questions, as identified by the paper setters,will beprovidedandthescoreswillbeappropriatelyscaled.

    Inthe2ndmeetingtheBoardmadepublicthefollowingqualifyingcriteriaforIITJEE.

    8. QualifyingcriterionJABdecidedthefollowingcriteriafordeclaringacandidateashavingqualifiedIITJEE.Candidatesobtainingatleast10%ineachsubjectand35%inaggregatewillbeinacommonranklist.OBC(NCL)candidateswithatleast9%ineachsubjectand31.5%inaggregatewillbeintheOBCranklist,whileSC/ST/PD candidates with at least 5% in each subject and 17.5% in aggregate will be in therespective rank lists. The SC/ST/PD preparatory rank lists will be prepared if the number ofcandidates in the respective list is less than 1.4 times the number of seats in that category.Candidates must secure at least 2.5% in each subject and 8.25% in aggregate to be in thepreparatoryranklist.Thecutoffsineachcategorywouldbedeterminedbythenumberofseatsinthatcategory.

    Inthe3ndmeetingtheBoardmadepublicfollowingpolicyforIITJEE.9. LengthoftheMeritListsforCounselling

    Itwasdecided that candidates corresponding to two times thenumberof seatswillbe called forcounselling inGEandOBCcategorieswhile itwouldbe3timesthenumberofseatsforSC,ST,andPD categories. In case the length of the Rank List of any category is less than that of thecorrespondingmeritlistthencounsellingwillberestrictedtothecandidatesinRanklistonly.

    10. ApprovedEXITpolicyAllowthepersontowithdrawhis/heracceptancebeforethe3rdroundallotment(counselling).Asan incentive it isproposed to refund the fee (Rs.40000orRs20000 afterdeductingRs.1000 asprocessing fee) provided the information reaches JEE office in time so that the resultant seat isallottedtoanotheraspirantinthethirdroundofcounselling.

    11. IdentitycheckingafterRegistrationJABapproved JICproposal tosupply alldetailsofsecurity features toestablish the identityof thepersonatthetimeofregistration intheInstituteandalso,thumbprintsofcandidatescollectedonthedayoftheexamination forconfirmingthatthepersonwhowroteexaminationandwhofinallytooktheadmissionarethesameornot.

    12. CounsellingfeereductionJABapprovedJICproposaltoreducethecounsellingfeefromRs.1000toRs.500.Thefeewouldbenonrefundableandwillbesameforallcategorycandidates.

    13. ImplementationofMinorityquotaoutofOBCquoteDecidedtoimplementtheminorityreservationonrosteringbasisfromthepresentacademicyear

  • 4

    In the 4th meeting the Board recommended the following resolution to the IIT Council for itsconsideration.

    14. NatureandmodalitiesofJEEAdvancedExamination2013

    JEEAdvancedexaminationshallbeconductedexclusivelybyIITs. ThereshallbeasuitabletimegapbetweentheJEEMainandJEEAdvancedsothattheresultsof

    JEEMainareavailablebeforetheJEEadvanced. Onlythetop1,50,000candidates(includingallcategories)inJEEMainwillbequalifiedtoappear

    intheJEEAdvancedExamination. AdmissiontoIITswillbebasedonlyoncategorywiseAllIndiaRank(AIR)inJEEAdvancedsubject

    toconditionthatsuchcandidatesare inthetop20percentileofsuccessfulcandidatesoftheirBoardsinrespectivecategories.

    TherewillbeseparateJABandJICforJEEAdvancedwiththepresentcomposition TheJABandJICwillalsocoordinatewithorganizingbodyresponsibleforconductingJEEMain.

    JABresolvedtheserecommendationsmaybeplacedbeforetheIITCouncilandSenatesofeachIITmaybetakenintoconfidence.

    Inthe5thmeetingtheBoardrecommendedtotheIITCouncilthatthestructureoftheJEEAdvanced2013andsyllabibethesameasthatofIITJEE2012.

    1.3 JointImplementationcommittee(JIC)

    Thiscommittee,whichconsistsoftheJEEChairmanandtheVicechairmanofthesevenIITs,hadtheconstitutiongivenbelow.Prof.A.Mahajan ChairmanJEE2012 IITBombayProf.TomMathew ViceChairman IITBombayProf.G.B.Reddy Org.ChairmanJEE2012 IITDelhiProf.N.D.Kurur ViceChairmanJEE2012 IITDelhiProf,RajeshKhanna ViceChairmanJEE2012 IITDelhiProf.B.P.Mandal ChairmanJEE2012 IITGuwahatiProf.S.Senthilvelan ViceChairmanJEE2012 IITGuwahatiProf.S.K.Choudhury ChairmanJEE2012 IITKanpurProf.R.Srivastava ViceChairmanJEE2012 IITKanpurProf.A.R.Mohanty ChairmanJEE2012 IITKharagpurProf.K.U.M.Rao ViceChairmanJEE2012 IITKharagpurProf.A.Singh ChairmanJEE2012 IITMadrasProf.R.Sarathi ViceChairmanJEE2012 IITMadrasProf.U.P.Singh ChairmanJEE2012 IITRoorkeeProf.M.L.Sharma ViceChairmanJEE2012 IITRoorkee

    Thecommitteehad11meetingstimestoplanandexecutetheeventsaccordingtothetimescheduledetailedbelow.

    SNo. Operation Deadline/Duration ActionbyorVenue1. JointAdmissionBoard2012:FirstMeeting 26August2011,Friday IITD2. 1stJIC2012MeetingatIITDelhi 2628August2011,FridaySunday IITD

    3. ReleaseofShortAdvertisement(EnglishandHindi)forJEE2012inleadingnewspaperandonwebsite30September2011,Friday

    IITD

    4. 2ndJICmeetingatIITDelhi(Instructionstosetters,onORSandpreparationsforCONOPS)1618October2011,SaturdaySunday IITDelhi

    5. ReleaseofLongadvertisementofIITJEE2012inEmploymentNews,RojgarSamacharandNationalDailies22October2011,Saturday IITD

  • 5

    SNo. Operation Deadline/Duration ActionbyorVenue6. UploadfullAdvertisementandIB(PDF)fileontheWebsite 22October2011,Saturday IITD

    7. Onlineapplicationwebsiteopensforcandidates 31October2011,Monday IITD

    8. StartdateforsaleofofflineOMRandIBsatBankcounters 11November2011,Friday Zonal9. Lastdateforonlineapplicationregistrationat5PM 10Dec.2011,Saturday IITD10. LastdateforissueofapplicationformsfromBanks 5December2011,Monday Zonal

    11. CONOPS 720December1629December ALL

    12. LastdateforReceiptoffilled(OMR)atrespectiveIITs 5PM,15December2011,Thursday Zonal

    13. 3rdJICMeetingatIITGuwahati(JIPS,Guidelinesfinalization,exchanginginterzonalapplicationsetc)

    2023January2012,FridaySaturday IITG

    14. 4thJICMeeting(tobesynchronizedwith2ndJAB2012) 1718February2012,IITD

    15. 5thJICMeetingatIITBombay

    (keyshandingover)24March2012,Saturday IITB

    16. ExaminationIITJEE2012 08April2012,Sunday Zonal

    17. CodingOperations(10daysoperation) 1120April2012,ThursdayMonday Zonal18. StartingdateformachinereadingofORS 202May2012,Monday Zonal

    19. 6thJICMeetingatIITMadras 29thApril2012

    IITM20. PublicationoffinalAnswerKeysonthewebsite 07May2012,Monday IITD21. 7

    thJICMeetingatIITDelhi(preparationofJEE2012Result)

    1416May,2012MondayWednesday IITD

    22. DeclarationofIITJEE2012Results(includingPreparatory)throughwebsiteandIVRSanddatesforcounseling.18May2012,Friday,8:00AM

    Zonal

    23. Onlinechoicefillingforallcategories(18days) 19May10June,2012SaturdaySundayIITD

    24. WebdisplayofORSofallcandidates(19days) 21May8June2012MondayFridayZonal

    25. Postingofcalllettersforcounselling 2122May2012,MondayTuesday Zonal26. OnlineregistrationvenuebookingforAAT 25May2012,Friday Zonal27. ArchitectureandDesignAptitudeTest 03June2012,Sunday AllIITs28. MedicalExaminationforQualifiedPDcandidates 0306June,MondayTuesday AllIITs29. DeclarationofAptitudeTestResults 08June2012,Friday IITD30. ClosureofJCOPportalforchoiceregistration 10June2012,Sunday Zonal31. 8

    thJICMeetingatIITDelhi(forFirstroundcourseallocation)

    1116June2012, IITD

    32. Websitereleaseoffirstroundcourseallocationresults 9AM,14June2012,Thursday IITD

  • 6

    SNo. Operation Deadline/Duration ActionbyorVenue

    33. 9thEightJICMeetingatIITDelhi(for3rdroundallocation&exchangingtheoriginalapplications)

    23July2012, IITD

    34. Websitereleaseofsecondroundcourseallocationresults 9AM,25June2012,Monday IITD

    35. 10thEightJICMeetingatIITDelhi

    (for3rdroundallocation&forexchangingtheapplications)1012July2012, IITD

    36. Websitereleaseofthirdroundcourseallocationresults 9AM,6July2012,Friday IITD37. 11thJICMeeting(Reviewmeeting) 30July2012,Monday IITR38. Finalizationofaccountstatement 06August2012,Monday IITD

    39. FinalizationofReport 20August2012,Monday IITD40. PreJABcombinedMeetingofJIC2012&JIC2013 2627August2012, IITD41. JABMeetingfor2012 27August2012, IITDTheJIC2012tookthefollowingmajorinitiatives:

    a) Implemented carbon copy paper based Optical Response Sheet for the first time in JEEsystem.

    b) Declared the category wise absolute cutoff marks (for each subject and aggregate) forrankingthecandidateswellinadvance.Thisstepinfactallowedthecandidatestomaximizethe aggregatemarks afterensuring theminimummarks in individual subject. ItdefinitelyreducedtheanxietyofthekidspreparingforIITJEE.

    c) Well before announcing the IITJEE 2012 results,we displayed the images of the answersheets of both papers of 479651 candidates along with the machine read answers andinvited the candidates to submit their review request in case they perceive any error inreading their responses. This decision ofwaswell received by the public.We have set astandardforsuchexaminations.

    d) Strengthened the security of postexamination operation by not printing any identifyingmarkssuchasscannumbersonORS.

    e) Provided Exit option for candidates who accepted the first/second allotted seat inanticipation of improvement. This decision also resulted in reducing the postregistrationdatevacancies.Thisyearthenumberhascomedownto340,which is lessthan50%ofthevacantseatsinprecedingyears.

    f) ConvertedtheunfilledPDseatsbacktorespectivecategories.Thisstepwasthoughttobenotpermissibleinearlieryears.

    g) Conducted four rounds of seat allocation, payment of registration fee as mark of seatacceptancewithoutanytechnicalsnag.

    h) Usedopenquotationspolicyforbringingtransparencyinmaterialprocurementprocess.

  • 7

    SECTION22.1 IITJEE2012Results

    TheJointEntranceExaminationfortheyear2012(IITJEE2012)wasconductedonSunday,April8,

    2012at1067examinationcentres in133citiesallover Indiaandalso inDubaicity.Ofthe506484candidatesregisteredforIITJEE,479651appearedinbothpapers.TheresultsofIITJEE2012wereannouncedasperscheduleonMay18,2012.TheresultswereprocessedasperthedecisionsmadeintheJointAdmissionsBoard(JAB)meetingheldon16October2011atIITDelhi.TheresultsweredisplayedontheJEEwebsites(ofthesevenzones)andonnoticeboardsofsevenIITs.

    TheTable2.1providesabriefcategorywisesummaryofthenumberofcandidateswhoappeared

    andqualifiedintheexamination.

    Acommonmerit list (CML)of18468candidateswaspreparedkeeping35%marksofaggregateascutoffand10%marksineachsubject.Thislistcontains14591General(GE),3449OBC,340SCand88ST.Thislistalsoincludes32candidateswhodeclaredthemselvesasforeignnationals.

    SeparatemeritlistswerepreparedforOBC,SC,STandPDcandidateswithrelaxationsof10%,50%,

    50%and50%ofmarksinsubjectlevelandaggregatemarksrespectively.Theselistscontained4853OBC,3465SC,1112STand167PDcandidates.

    A totalof2425PD candidates (selfdeclared)appeared in IITJEE2012and167of themqualified

    based on the relaxed norms. Out of these 101 were GEPD, 60 were OBCPD and 6 were SCPDcandidates.

    Inall24112candidatesqualifiedinIITJEE2012.

    IITJEE2012wasconductedforadmissionsto15IITs,ITBHUandISMDhanbad.ThefifteenIITsareat

    Bhubaneswar, Bombay, Delhi, Gandhinagar, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Indore, Kanpur, Kharagpur,Madras,Mandi,Patna,Rajasthan,RoorkeeandRopar.Thetotalnumberofseatsavailable inthese17institutionsacrossallcategorieswas9647.

    AsperthedirectivesoftheChiefCommissionerforPersonwithDisabilitiesanddecisionoftheJAB,

    3%oftheseatsavailableineachverticalcategorywerereservedforPDcandidates.ArostersystemtoreservethePDseatsacrossvariousinstitutesandcourseswasfollowedin2012continuingonthe2010roster.

    Thebreakupofseatsfordifferentcategoriesacrossallthe17institutesisgiveninTable2.2.Table2.2:TotalseatsavailableinalladmittingInstitutes

    GE OBC SC ST TotalTotalSeatsavailable 4722 2536 1403 708 9369ForPDcandidates 138 77 43 20 278

    Table2.1NumberofcandidatesappearedinIITJEE2012andqualifiedCandidates GE OBC SC ST TotalAppeared 277931 136570 46610 18540 479651Qualified 14682 4853 3465 1112 24112

  • 8

    2.2.CounsellingOf the 24112 qualified candidates,17465candidateswereshortlistedforseatallocation.Amongst these16325candidates registered online for thecounselling and paid the fee. Only15893 candidates filled the coursechoices. Zonewise data is shown intheTable2.3.2.3.MedicalBoardExaminationThisyearmedicalboards forverifyingthe PD status of the candidatesqualified under PD category and PDpreparatorycandidateswereconductedon4th,5thand6thJune2012 inBombay,Delhi,Guwahati,Kanpur,KharagpurandMadras.AllPD candidateshad to registeronline foramedicalexaminationatoneof theMedicalboardvenues.Ofthe167PDcandidates,129candidateswerefoundtoeligibleforPDseatsinIITs.2.4.CandidateswhodidnotfilledchoicesOut of the 8030GE candidates in the CML, 514 did not fill the course choices.Amongst the 4853OBCcandidates,573didnotfillthechoicesheets.IntheSCcategory,333candidatesofthe3466didnotexercisetheirchoicewhilst intheSTcase itwas59outof1112.Allexceptoneofthe129PDcandidatesfilledthechoices.2.5.AAT2012TestTheAAT2012 testwasadministeredatall thesevenIITson3rdJunebetween9:00amand12Noon.Atotalof726candidateswrotethetest.The zonewise numbers of candidatesregisteredisgiveninTable2.4.Thecutoffmarkforqualifyingtheaptitudetestwasfixedat35%(105marks)ofthemaximumin consultation with the evaluating facultymembers.2.6.CounsellingstatisticsOutofthe16325candidateswhowereeligibletofillthechoicesheets,432didnotfillthechoices.Tables2.5and2.6summarizestheseatallocationzonewise.

    Table2.3Zonewisedistributionofcandidatesshortlistedforcounselingandparticipatedincounselling

    Institute(zone)

    CandidatesQualified

    CalledforCounselling

    Candidateswhopaidcounsellingfees

    IITBombay 5562 4240 4013IITDelhi 4108 2906 2727IITGuwahati 1280 971 919IITKanpur 2938 2102 1980IITKharagpur 2616 1863 1714IITMadras 5004 3666 3265IITRoorkee 2604 1717 1617Total 24112 17465 16235

    Table2.4ZonewisenumberofcandidatesregisteredforArchitectureAptitudeTest2012

    Institute(zone) Candidatesattended

    CandidatesQualified

    IITBombay 88 72IITDelhi 291 230IITGuwahati 23 19IITKanpur 111 74IITKharagpur 84 66IITMadras 80 59IITRoorkee 49 30Total 726 550

    Table2.5:Zonewisedistributionofcandidateswhogot/notgotadmissionofferNo. Zone Allotted Notallotted Total1 Bombay 2506 1734 42402 Delhi 1597 1309 29063 Guwahati 516 455 9714 Kanpur 1121 981 21025 Kharagpur 995 868 18636 Madras 1970 1696 36667 Roorkee 871 846 1717 Total 9576 7889 17465

  • 9

    2.7.FirstRoundseatAllocationA totalnumberof9500candidateswereallottedseats in the first roundofseatallotmentofwhich9073candidatespaidthefeestoaccepttheofferofadmission.These9073candidateswerealsoeligibleforthesubsequentroundsofseatallocationandanupgradeoftheirchoice,ifpermissible.The427whodidnotpaythe registration feewere eliminated from further rounds of the counselling. In the second round, 434candidates were allotted seats afresh, while in the third round this number was 641. The number ofcandidateswhoseseatunderwentachangebetweenthefirstandsecondroundwas2051whilethisnumberwas2549betweenthesecondandthirdrounds.AsisevidentfromtheTable2.7below,thenumberofboysallottedseatsinthe17institutesoutnumberedthegirlssignificantly.Table2.8tableshowsthecandidatesfromvariouszoneswhopaidtheregistrationfeeafterthefirst,second,thirdandfourthroundofseatallotments.IntheTable2.9thenumberinparenthesisisthenumberofseatsreservedforpersonswithdisability.Table2.7Numberofboysandgirlswhogotseat

    offersinanyofthe17Institutes. Boys Girls TotalIITBhubaneswar 108 10 118IITBombay 793 88 881IITMandi 107 12 119IITDelhi 757 91 848IITIndore 97 22 119IITKharagpur 1189 143 1332IITHyderabad 176 23 199IITRajasthan 142 16 158IITKanpur 753 72 825IITMadras 729 104 833IITGandhinagar 109 9 118IITPatna 110 9 119IITRoorkee 1025 124 1149ISMDhanbad 878 67 945IITRopar 112 8 120ITBHUVaranasi 959 83 1042IITGuwahati 595 56 651Total 8639 937 9576Table2.9Categorywiseseatallotmentdata General OBC SC ST TotalSeatsavailable(PDSeats) 4722(138) 2536(77) 1403(43) 708(20) 9647Candidateswhofilledchoicesheets 7428 4280 3132 1053 15893Seatsallotted 4761 2648 1442 725 9576

    Table2.6Numberofseatsavailableandnumberofcandidatesparticipatedincounselling GE GEPD OBC OBCPD SC SCPD ST STPD TotalSeatsavailable 4722 138 2536 77 1403 43 708 20 9647Candidateswhofilledchoicesheets 7428 4280 3132 1053 15893Seatsallotted 4761 2648 1442 725 9576

    Table2.8:Zonewisedistributionofcandidateswhopaidthecounsellingfee

    No. Place Number1 IITBombay 25062 IITDelhi 15973 IITGuwahati 5164 IITKanpur 11215 IITKharagpur 9956 IITMadras 19707 IITRoorkee 871 Total 9576

  • 2

    2.8.SupernumeraryseatsTen(10)supernumeraryseatswerecreatedduemainlytoissuesrelatedtothecategorycertificates.Inaddition,thefollowingtenforeignnationalcandidateswereallottedsupernumeraryseats:1041085(B4125), 1041377(B4117), 2054584(J4125), 5077255(U4111),6019501(G5504), 6089352(M5217), 6094389(K4201), 6095274(G4101),6095362(D4117), 6126114(M4107)2.9.PreparatoryCourseCounsellingandseatallocationNoSCorSTpreparatorylistwasmadesincethenumberofqualifiedcandidatesexceeded1.4timesthenumber of seats in the respective categories. A total 158 seatswere transferred to PD preparatorycourseaftermakingallotmenttoregularPDcandidates.ThezonewisenumberofqualifiedpreparatoryPDcandidatesisgiveninthetablebelow:

    Table2.10:PDcandidatesqualifiedandgotadmissionoffer Bombay Delhi Guwahati Kanpur Kharagpur Madras Roorkee TotalPrep.PDqualified 38 22 46 30 33 40 24 233Prep.PDattended 22 14 28 15 21 22 4 126

    MedicalexaminationsofthepreparatoryPDcandidateswerecarriedoutalongwiththePDcandidatesasstatedearlier.Thezonewisedistributionofcandidatesandthenumberswhoattendedthemedicalexamination are also given above.Amongst these 59GEPD, 50OBCPD and 6 SCPD candidateswereallowed to fill the choices online for the preparatory course. Of the 158 seats earmarked for thepreparatory courses in the 17 institutions, only 82 candidates were allotted seats. The vacantpreparatoryseatsweretransferredtotheirrespectivecategories.

    2.10TRENDANALYSISTrendanalysishasbeencarriedoutusinghistoricaldata.Table2.11capturesthetrendinthenumberofregisteredcandidatesforthelast15years.Thenumberofcandidatesregisteredshowsamorethan5foldincreaseinthelast15years,reachinganalltimehighof506484totalregisteredcandidatesintheyear2012.Theincreaseinthenumberoftotalregisteredcandidatesin2012ascomparedtothesamein2011ishoweveronlyabout4.4%,ascomparedtoabout2%increasefrom2010to2011,whichis,inalllikelihoodtheresultofdecreasingtheapplicationfeeforfemales.Interpreting the zonewise data of registered candidate of 2012 and especially the comparisonwith2011requirescautionastherewasareorganizationofcentersbetweenBombay,Delhi,andRoorkeesoas tocontrol the increasinglyunmanageablenumbers in theBombayzone.Theopeningofcenters inAlwar and Sikar along with the transfer of Udaipur to Delhi has eased the situation in Jaipur asevidencedbythereductioninBombaybyalmost10%.Madrashasshownatremendousjump,closeto15%increase,between2011and2012.Table2.12capturesthetrendintermsofthecandidatesbelongingtovariouscategories.ThenumberofGE candidateshas increased approximately two times in the last ten years,whereas,over the sameperiod,thenumberofSCandSTcandidateshasincreasedfourandsixtimes,respectively.Thismaybeattributedtotheincreaseinthenumberofseatsavailableinthevariousreservedcategoriesandduetothe importancegiventoJEEbytheeligiblestudents inthevariouscategories.ThenumberofOBC,SC,andSTcategorycandidateshasrelativelyremainedunchangedbetween2011and2012.Table2.13capturesthetrendintermsofthelanguageofquestionpaperused.Approximately85%ofthecandidatesusedEnglishquestionpaperandabout15%used theHindiquestionpaper in the JEE2012aswasthecasein2011and2010.Tillaboutthemid2000sthisratiowascloseto90%forEnglishand10%forHindiandhasincreasedtothepresentratio.

  • 3

    Table 2.14 captures the trend in terms of number of attempts. In JEE2012, about 80 % of thecandidateshaveattempted JEE for the first timeandabout20%haveattempted JEE for the secondtime. As can be seen in Table B4, since 2007, except forminor differences this ratio has remainedconstantandmaybeattributedtothe introductionofaceilingonthenumberofattemptsallowed inJEE.Table 2.15 captures the genderwise trend in the number of registered candidates. Expectedly, thereductionintheapplicationfeeforfemaleshasledtoanincreaseinthefractionofgirlsregisteringforJEE.Inthe1990stheratiowascloseto9to10infavorofboys,whichdecreasedto7to1intheearly2000s,to4to1inthemidandlate2000s,to2to1in2012.During2008to2011itwasobservedthatthisratiowasapproachingcloseto1girlcandidateforeverythreeboycandidates.

  • Table2.11Zonewisetrendofregisteredcandidates

    Year IITB % IITD % IITG % IITK % IITKgp % IITM % IITR % Total1997 14381 15.8 17875 19.6 21655 23.7 23780 26.1 13588 14.9 912791998 15400 16.1 19115 20.0 23777 24.9 23240 24.3 14087 14.7 956191999 17673 15.7 25829 23.0 1393 1.2 28837 25.7 24201 21.5 14414 12.8 1123472000 18434 14.3 31753 24.7 1403 1.1 32672 25.4 28756 22.4 15607 12.1 1286252001 22532 15.3 39271 26.6 1806 1.2 36711 24.8 29962 20.3 17493 11.8 1477752002 27486 15.4 48115 27.0 3058 1.7 40943 23.0 35787 20.1 18420 10.4 4234 2.4 1780432003 25896 14.5 37150 20.8 14384 8.0 33905 19.0 30897 17.3 19477 10.9 17231 9.6 1789402004 28743 16.4 35052 20.0 14144 8.1 33321 19.0 27632 15.8 20134 11.5 16329 9.3 1753552005 33916 17.1 36709 18.5 16656 8.4 35190 17.8 29498 14.9 24007 12.1 22083 11.2 1980592006 50854 17.0 52414 17.5 25812 8.6 53979 18.1 41362 13.8 42264 14.1 32402 10.8 2990872007 46789 18.6 47776 19.0 16486 6.6 39760 15.8 33939 13.5 39916 15.9 27137 10.8 2518032008 63517 19.2 53192 16.6 20826 6.5 47187 14.7 42242 13.1 51747 16.1 42648 13.3 3216532009 83838 21.1 62974 15.8 31323 7.9 48819 12.3 53959 13.5 67093 16.8 50258 12.6 3982642010 80761 17.0 73789 15.6 54471 12.0 73929 15.6 61263 12.9 68537 14.5 61232 14.5 4739822011 85146 17.6 70793 14.6 58610 12.1 80348 16.6 63016 13.0 65612 13.5 61611 12.7 4851362012 77322 15.3 74499 14.7 62160 12.2 82679 16.3 65362 12.9 77970 15.4 66492 13.1 506484

  • Table2.12TrendofregisteredcandidatesaccordingtocategoryYear GE % OBC % SC % ST % Total1997 81990 89.8 0 0 7235 7.9 1742 1.9 912791998 84951 88.9 0 0 8282 8.7 1942 2.0 955171999 99171 88.3 0 0 10036 8.9 2382 2.1 1123442000 115319 89.7 0 0 9951 7.7 2495 1.9 1286252001 131706 89.1 0 0 11796 8.0 3141 2.1 1477752002 158994 89.3 0 0 14224 8.0 3597 2.0 1780432003 157542 88.0 0 0 15914 8.9 4033 2.3 1789402004 154811 88.3 0 0 15294 8.7 4041 2.3 1753552005 175331 88.5 0 0 17304 8.7 4717 2.4 1980592006 264536 88.4 0 0 26800 9.0 6707 2.2 2990872007 222515 88.4 0 0 22049 8.8 6519 2.6 2518032008 208328 64.8 74404 23.1 29829 9.3 9092 2.8 3216532009 239917 60.2 107285 26.9 37825 9.5 13237 3.3 3982642010* 268684 59.0 128114 28.1 42800 9.4 15973 3.5 4555712011 276239 56.9 142297 29.3 47358 9.8 19242 4.0 4851362012 294333 58.11 143284 28.29 49087 9.69 19780 3.91 506484*Thedatafor2010isbasedonappearedcandidates

  • Table2.13TrendofregisteredcandidatesaccordingtolanguageofquestionpaperYear English % Hindi % Total1997 81809 89.6 9490 10.4 912991998 86038 90.0 9581 10.0 956191999 99099 88.2 13248 11.8 1123472000 114126 88.7 14499 11.3 1286252001 131742 89.2 16033 10.9 1477752002 159116 89.4 18927 10.6 1780432003 161151 90.1 17789 9.9 1789402004 158989 90.7 16366 9.3 1753552005 179491 90.6 18568 9.4 1980592006 261412 87.4 37675 12.6 2990872007 221097 87.9 30706 12.2 2518032008 279579 86.9 42074 13.1 3216532009 347084 87.1 51180 12.9 3982642010* 393856 86.5 61655 13.5 4555112011 415412 85.6 69724 14.4 4851362012 432319 85.4 74165 14.6 506484*Thedatafor2010isbasedonappearedcandidates

  • Table2.14TrendofregisteredcandidatesaccordingtonumberofattemptsYear No.ofregisteredcandidates Firstattempt % Secondattempt % Third/moreattempts % Notavailable2001 147775 99069 67.0 32611 22.1 15902 10.8 2002 178043 118755 66.7 40238 22.6 18873 10.6 2003 178940 116198 64.9 38846 21.7 17021 9.5 2004 175355 114682 65.4 41559 23.7 18763 10.7 2005 198059 132765 67.0 45488 23.0 19806 10.0 2006 299087 213485 71.4 51359 17.2 15289 5.1 2007 251803 201298 79.9 50370 20.0 NA NA 1352008 321653 264881 82.4 56488 17.6 NA NA 2842009 398264 336686 84.5 61370 15.4 NA NA 2082010 473982 NA NA 2011 485136 389129 80.2 95785 19.7 NA NA 2222012 506484 416289 82.1 89970 17.7 225 0.04

  • Table2.15TrendofregisteredcandidatesbasedongenderYear Male % Female % Total1997 81461 89.2 9818 10.8 912791998 84791 88.7 10828 11.3 956191999 99608 88.7 12684 11.3 1122922000 112403 87.4 16222 12.6 1286252001 128118 86.7 19657 13.3 1477752002 152319 85.6 25624 14.5 1780432003 153192 85.6 25748 14.4 1789402004 150786 86.0 24569 14.0 1753552005 168762 85.2 29297 14.8 1980592006 244190 81.7 54897 18.4 2990872007 195250 77.5 56553 22.5 2518032008 243399 75.7 78254 24.3 3216532009 295831 74.3 102431 25.7 3982642010* 342447 75.2 113063 24.8 4555712011 371400 76.6 113736 23.4 4851362012 337916 66.72 168568 33.28 506484*Thedatafor2010isbasedonappearedcandidates

  • 4

    SECTION3 StatisticalAnalysisPARTA:IITJEE2012ApplicationsRegistrationdataandtrendsThezonewisedistributionof the totalnumberofappearedandqualifiedcandidatesalongwith theircategoryaregiveninTablesA1andA2.Outofatotalof506484(inJEE2011485136)candidateswhoregistered in all zones, 479651 (in JEE2011 468280, 96.5%) candidates (94.7%) appeared for theexamination.Thisrepresentsanincreaseinthenumberofcandidatesrelativeto2011,whichhoweverisoffset by an increase in the absentees by almost two percentage points. A total of 24112 (5.02%)candidatesqualifiedforcounselling.Thiscannotbecomparedwiththedatain2011asthequalificationcriteriaadoptedinthetwoyearsweredifferent.Thezonewisedistributionofqualifiedcandidatesis:Bombay5562(23.06%)(inJEE20113248,24.6%),Delhi 4108 (17.03%) (in JEE2011 2106, 15.9%),Guwahati 1280 (5.31%) (in JEE2011 534, 4.04%),Kanpur 2938 (12.38%) (in JEE2011 1523, 11.54%), Kharagpur 2616 (10.84%) (in JEE2011 1511,11.4%),Madras5004 (20.75%) (in JEE20113049,23.1%)andRoorkee2604 (10.80%) (in JEE20111225,9.28%).ThepercentagesarecomparablewiththedataofJEE2010.CategorywisedistributionTheCategorywisedistributionofappearedcandidates isshown inTableA1.57.95%ofthecandidateswhoappeared in JEE2012wereGEcandidates,28.47%areOBCcandidates,9.72%areSCcandidatesand3.87%areSTcandidates.TheCategorywisedistributionofqualified candidates is shown in TableA2.60.47%of thequalifiedcandidateswereGEcandidates,19.87%wereOBCcandidates,14.34%wereSCcandidates,4.61%wereSTcandidates,and0.692%werePDcandidates.Despitethedifferentqualificationcriteriaadoptedin2011and2012,thecategorywisedistributiondoesnotshowamarkedchange.CityoforiginofapplicantsItwasobservedthat15citiesaccountedfor50%oftheregisteredcandidates(seeTableA3).Patnaledthewaywithmorethan38000,followedbyDelhiandJaipurwith36,000and34,000respectively.Thefourthbiggestcity,Hyderabad,hadalmost10000lessthanJaipur.TableA4givesthedetailsofthequalifiedcandidatesfromdifferentcities.highestnumberofcandidatesqualifiedfromJaipurcityfollowedbyHyderabad,DelhiandVijayawada.OnlineandofflineRegistrationzonalvariationTableA5givesnumberofcandidatesregisteredusingofflineapplicationandonlineapplicationinallsevenzones.GenderVariationTableA10showsthezonewisedistributionofregistered,qualified,counseled,andadmittedcandidatesaccording to gender. The number of female candidates registered in JEE2012 is 168568, which is33.28%ofthetotalregisteredcandidates.Outofthe24112candidateswhoqualified,2886arefemalecandidates (11.97%). In JEE 2011, 1086533 female candidates appeared (23.2%) and 1443 qualified(11.2%).Presumablyasaresultofthedrasticreductionoftheapplicationfeesforgirls,atenpercentagepoint increase in the female registrationobserved.Disconcertingly, this increasehasonly amarginalincreaseinthepercentageofqualifiedfemalecandidates.

  • 5

    PARTB:ParametersinfluencingthecandidatesperformanceinIITJEETheperformanceisgaugedbyconsideringtheratioofthecandidateswhoobtainedrankinIITJEEandthe corresponding number of candidates who attempted the IITJEE 2012. It is observed that thefollowingparameterdoinfluencethechancesofapersonclearingtheIITJEEornot.

    (a) Preparationmethodsthecandidatesadopts(b) Placeofschoolingviz.Village,townorcity(c) Boardfromwherethecandidatepassedthequalifyinghis/herExamination(d) YearofpassingQualifyingExamination(e) CandidatesMotherTongue

    a. PreparationbythecandidatesforattemptingIITJEE:

    On average, only one in five registered students took extra help (most probably some sort ofcoaching)buttheymakeupabouthalfofthesuccessfulcandidates.Morethantwofoldincreaseintheirsuccessrateoverotherstudents(whoonlydidselfstudy)isaclearindicationoftheeffectofextrahelp(probablyprofessionalcoaching).Furtheranalysisalsosupportsthisassertion.WhileselfstudystudentscouldholdtheirowninzoneslikeBombayandMadrasandtoaslightlylesserextentinDelhizone,theycouldnotperformwellinGuwahati,Kanpur,RoorkeeandKharagpurzones.ItisworthnoticingthatstudentsinGuwahatizonehadperformedmuchbetteriftheyhadsomeextrahelp. It alsohints at availabilityofbetter conditionsof selfstudy inBombay,Madras andDelhizones.ThedatabasedonwhichtheaboveconclusionisdrawnisgivenTableA6

    b. Placeofschoolingandcategory:

    About45%oftheregisteredcandidatescamefromBombayandMadrasZonesasopposedto5%from Guwahati zone. Increased opportunity for students in the Bombay and Madras zones ascompared toGuwahati zone is probably themain reason for this difference. The share ofOBCcandidates increased in registrations from townsandvillages. In fact,moreOBCcandidates thangeneralcandidatesregisteredfromvillages.Ofallthecandidateswhowereofferedadmission,61%,27%and12%candidateswerefromthecities,townsandvillages,respectively.Aslightlydifferentdistributionisseenintheregisteredcandidatesascorrespondingnumberschangetoroughly51%,30%and19%.Overallcitycandidatesdidbetterasagainst51%registrationtheycouldget61%ofthetotaladmissionoffers.SCandSTcandidatesdidrelativelybetterinthecitiesastheygot8%and4%ofadmissionofferscomparedtoabout5%and1.5%ofregistrations. Itcanbeseenassignofmore effective use of the reservation policy in cities. General candidates, on the other handperformedbetterinthecities.ThesupportingdataaregivenTableA7

    c. BoardfromwherethecandidatepassedthequalifyingExamination: CBSEboardstudentsperformedbetter than thestateboardstudentsas theyconstituted38%of

    the qualified candidates which is higher than the 30% registered in GE category. State boardstudentsmadeupabout40%ofthequalifiedcandidatesagainst51%ofregistrations.Morethan90%oftheregisteredcandidatescamefromstateboardsandCBSEwithICSEcontributinganother4%.Interestingly,1%(about5000innumber)studentsstudiedoutsidethesethree.GeneralcandidatesseemtopreferCBSEastheyconstituteabouttwothirdofallregistrationsandthreefourthofqualifiedcandidates fromCBSE.Their share in registrationandqualification fromotherboardsdroptolessthan50%and60%,respectively.OBContheotherhand,seemtopreferthestateboardsastheymakeupmorethanonethirdofregisteredaswellasqualifiedcandidatesfromthestateboards.TherespectivenumbersfortheminCBSEdroptoaboutonefifth.SCandSTdonotshowanymajorchangeinsharesinboththeBoards.ReferTableA8

  • 6

    d. TheRoleofgender

    It isabsolutelyclear thatboyshaveperformedbetterthangirls.Whileonlyabout twiceasmanyboysregisteredthangirls,eighttimesmoreboysqualified,ninetimesmoreboyswerecounseledandgotadmissionoffer.The same trend is seenacrossvariouscategorieswithminorvariations.RatiosforOBCareevenworseandthoseofSCandSTshowmarginalimprovement.Toaddtothis,girlshavegot lesser ranksalso.This canbe seenbyworsening ratiosaswemove fromdata forqualified todata for counseledand finaladmission.The increaseofgirls share in registrationascompared toearlieryearsmaybeattributed toRegistration feeexemption forgirlsandgeneralincreaseingirlsparticipation.It is felt that the fact that33%ofregisteredcandidatesaregirls,which isa remarkable increase,comparedtothepreviousyearnumbers.Exemptionoffeehasdefinitelyhasapositive impactonthemindsetof thegirl.Numbersofgirlsgettingqualified in IITJEE is likely togoup in futureasmoreandmoregirlswritetheexamination.ReferTablesA9A10

    e. EducationalqualificationsofparentsItisclearthatthelevelofparentseducationhasamarkedeffectonthecandidatesperformance(seeTableA11).Candidateswithbothparentsgraduate(BG)haveperformedmuchbetter(almosttwentypercentagepointshigher)thanthosewithonlyoneparentgraduate(OG)who, inturn(bytenpercentagepoints),haveperformedbetterthancandidateswithnoneoftheparentsgraduate(NG).

    f. LanguageofquestionpaperusedforwritingIITJEE English remains the overwhelmingly favored language of question paper. More than 85% of

    registeredcandidateschoseEnglish(seeTableA12).ThesecandidateshaveperformedbetterthanthosewhochoseHindiwith94.4%ofthequalifiedopting forEnglish.Nocandidate fromMadraszonewhoopted forHindiqualified.The samewas true inGuwahati zone.More than two timescandidatesqualifiedfromBombayzonethan intheclosestcontender,Delhizone,amongstthoseopting forHindias theQP language.Candidatesopting forHindihavenotperformedwell in theKanpurzonewhereashareof4.5% inregistrationdeclines to0.45% incounseledstudents.Theyhaveperformedwell inBombayzonewhere theyarecounseled inabout thesame ratioas theyhaveregistered.

    g. Placeofresidenceviz.village,townorcity

    TheRegisteredaswellasqualifiedcandidateswereconcentratedinafewbigcities.Morethanhalfthecandidatesqualifiedfromjustelevencities.Infact,morethan90%qualifiedfromjustabout75cities.SimilarnumberofstudentsappearedfromPatna,DelhiandJaipurwithPatnaslightlyaheadoftheothertwo.Morethan2500candidatesqualifiedfromJaipur.HyderabadandDelhitakethesecondandthirdspot,respectively.Withslightlymorethan1000qualifiedcandidates,Vijaywadacomesadistantfourthinthislistbuthasthebestsuccessrateasonly10000candidatesregisteredfromthere.SupportingdataisinTableA13.

    h. Occupationofparents

    ParentsOccupationhasaslightbutdefiniteeffectoncandidatesperformance.Candidateswhoseparents are in medical and engineering professions have performed slightly better than othercandidates.Candidateswhoseparentsareinagricultureorindefenseserviceshavenotbeenabletoperformaswellasothers.SupportingdataisinTableA14.

    i. CandidatesMotherTongue

    Hindihas thehighest representation for registered,qualifiedand counselled.Thenext closest isTeluguwhichissmallerbymorethanafactorof4.ThenumberofcandidatesregisteredinMarathiisnotveryhighbutthenumbersqualifiedisdisproportionatelyhigh.ReferTableA16.

  • 7

    j. ParentsIncomeTheproportionofOBC(NCL)candidateswhoseparental income isbelow1 lakh relative to thosewithincomebetween1and4.5lakhsisdisproportionatelyhighcomparetoalltheothercategories.SupportingdataisinTableA17.

    PARTC:JEE2012Questionpaper:AnsweringpatternJEE2012 had two papers; each had three parts Physics, Chemistry, andMathematics. In both thepapers, parts 1, 2, and 3 contained 20 questions each in Physics, Chemistry, and Mathematics,respectively.Thequestionswerenumberedconsecutivelyinboththepapers.InPaper1,eachparthad threesections.Section1had10multiplechoicequestionseachhavingonecorrectanswerwithmaximumof3marks;Section2had5multiplechoicequestionseachhavingoneormorecorrectanswer(s)withmaximumof4marks;Section3had5integeranswertypequestionseachhavingmaximum of 4marks. Therewere negativemarkings forwrong answers in Section1, but nonegativemarkingsinSections2and3.InPaper2,eachparthad three sections. Section1had8multiple choicequestionseachhavingonecorrectanswerwithmaximumof3marks;Section2had6multiplechoicequestionsrelatingtothreequestionswith2questionsoneachparagraphandhavingonlyonecorrectanswerwithmaximumof3marks;Section3had8multiplechoicequestionseachhavingonecorrectanswerwithmaximumof4marks.TherewerenegativemarkingsforwronganswersinSection1andSection2,butnotinSection3.A candidate couldhave scoredanythingbetween 30 to210 inPaper1,andbetween 42 to198 inPaper2. That is, marks of a candidate might have taken any value between 72 to 408, with theminimum and maximum possible marks in each subject being 24 and 136, respectively. In twoquestions,oneeach inChemistryandMathematicsofPaper2worth3and4marks respectively,allcandidateswere awarded zeromarks. Therefore, theminimum andmaximumpossiblemarks in theChemistrypartwouldbe23and133whilethatofMathematicswouldbe24and132respectively.Relaxationsof10%andof50%weregivenontheaveragemarksineachsubjectforconsideringtheOBCandSC/ST/PDcategorycandidatesforranking.Theminimummarkscoredwas64(minussixtyfour)andthemaximummarkwas385.TheroundedoffaveragemarkssecuredinPhysics,Chemistry,andMathematicsbythecandidateswere16,17,and13,respectively.ThefollowingareafewobservationsregardingtheperformanceofcandidatesinJEE2012.

    1. ThehighestaggregatemarksscoredbyacandidateinJEE2012were385,thatis,96.0%of401marks.

    2. Only27candidatesscoredabove350marks.275candidatesscoredabove300marks.3. ThemarkscoredbythelastrankedcandidateintheCommonMeritList(CML)was141.Thiswas

    theaggregatecutoffforCML.4. Themaximummarksscoredoutof136inChemistry,Physics,andMathematicswere133,132,

    and132marks.5. Thenumberofcandidateswhoscoredmorethan120 inChemistry,Physics,andMathematics

    wererespectively31,17,and38,respectively.6. TheminimummarksscoredinChemistry,Physics,andMathematicsbycandidatesinCMLwere

    14, 14, and 14, respectively. In fact, there were many candidates with relatively poorperformanceinaparticularsubjectdespitehavinghighaggregatemarks.

  • 8

    It isobservedthattherehadbeenvery lowcutoffmarks in individualsubjects inJEEforthepastfewyears.SincetimemanagementskillhasmoreeffectinacompetitiveexaminationlikeJEE,thelowmarksscored in a particular subject along with high aggregate score does not necessarily establish thecandidate'slowproficiencyinthatsubject.Therefore,minimumlevelofproficiencyineachofthethreesubjects,eventhoughwithlowindividualcutoffscores,asdemandedinJEEisreasonable.Afrequencydistributionofcandidatesaccordingtotheirmarksinthethreesubjectsandtheaggregatemarksarepresentedinthefiguresonpages2023.Itmaybenotedthateachofthegraphsinthefiguresisskewedtotheleft.ThoughtherangeofscoresofacandidateinPhysicswas24to136andChemistrywas23to133,andthatinMathematicsisfrom24to132,theroundedoffmeans(17,16and13)ofthesedistributionsaremuch lowerthanthemidpointsofthemodes.Thedistributionsofthesubjectmarksarealmostidenticalwiththatoftheaggregatemarks.SincetheaimoftheJEEistosingleoutabout10000bestcandidatesoutofabout5lakhcandidates,thequestionsareframedwithahighlevelofdifficulty.ThehighestscoreinJEE2012is385outof401,i.e,96.0%.Thiswas91.7%inJEE2011,85.5%inJEE2010,88.3%inJEE2009and88.5%inJEE2008.Lookingatthecompetitivenessoftheexamination,thehighestscoreisuptothemark.Itisalsoevidentthatthedifficulty level of the question papers in JEE2012 has decreased substantially. The question papersettersweregivenguidelinestoframequestionsinsuchawaythatatleast30%ofthequestionscanbeattemptedbyanycandidatewithgoodpreparationfortheboardexamination.Adetailedanalysisofthenumberofcandidatesattemptingeachquestioninthethreepartsofboththepapers,numberwhogotthequestionrightandwholeftthequestionblankisprovidedinthefollowingtables:

  • TableA11: ZoneWiseDistributionOfRegistered,QualifiedAndCounselledCandidatesAccordingToParentsEducationalQualifications

    BG: Bothparentsgraduates OG: Oneoftheparentsgraduate NG: Noneoftheparentsgraduate

    TotalAppearedCandidates47651 TotalQualified24112 TotalCounselled17465Zone (Numbers) (inpercentages) (Numbers) (inpercentages) (Numbers) (inpercentages)

    BG OG NG BG OG NG BG OG NG BG OG NG BG OG NG BG OG NGIITBombay 25128 25178 23058 5.24 5.25 4.81 2749 1766 1047 10.95 7.03 4.17 1883 1453 904 10.78 8.32 5.18IITDelhi 27906 22931 19834 5.82 4.78 4.14 2213 1209 686 8.81 4.81 2.73 1374 950 582 7.87 5.44 3.33IITGuwahati 13961 22453 22964 2.91 4.68 4.79 434 495 351 1.73 1.97 1.40 284 392 295 1.63 2.24 1.69IITKanpur 29001 29213 20778 6.05 6.09 4.33 1553 923 462 6.18 3.68 1.84 1000 720 382 5.73 4.12 2.19IITKharagpur 22391 21689 17752 4.67 4.52 3.70 1287 819 510 5.13 3.26 2.03 829 607 427 4.75 3.48 2.44IITMadras 26448 22295 23238 5.51 4.65 4.84 2530 1421 1053 10.07 5.66 4.19 1721 1093 852 9.85 6.26 4.88IITRoorkee 24256 19557 19620 5.06 4.08 4.09 1486 651 467 5.92 2.59 1.86 888 466 363 5.08 2.67 2.08Total 169091 163316 147244 35.25 34.05 30.70 12252 7284 4576 48.79 29.01 18.22 7979 5681 3805 45.69 32.53 21.79

  • TableA6: ZoneWiseDistributionOfRegistered,QualifiedAndCounselledCandidatesAccordingToThePreparationMethod

    Totalappeared47651 Totalqualified24112 TotalCounselled

    (inNumbers) (InPercentage) (inNumbers) (InPercentage) (inNumbers) (InPercentage)Zone SelfStudy(SS)

    Others(OM) SS OM SS OM SS OM SS OM SS OM

    IITBombay 56655 16709 11.81 3.48 2913 2649 12.08 10.99 2253 1987 12.90 11.38IITDelhi 54495 16176 11.36 3.37 2031 2077 8.42 8.61 1427 1479 8.17 8.47

    IITGuwahati 49056 10322 10.23 2.15 731 549 3.03 2.28 551 420 3.15 2.40IITKanpur 64737 14255 13.50 2.97 1534 1404 6.36 5.82 1101 1001 6.30 5.73

    IITKharagpur 51442 10390 10.72 2.17 1624 992 6.74 4.11 1147 716 6.57 4.10IITMadras 51524 20457 10.74 4.26 2516 2488 10.43 10.32 1852 1814 10.60 10.39IITRoorkee 52870 10563 11.02 2.20 1518 1086 6.30 4.50 969 748 5.55 4.28

    Total 380779 98872 79.39 20.61 12867 11245 53.36 46.64 9300 8165 53.25 46.75

  • TableA14: ParentsOccupationandsuccessrate:BoysandGirlsParentsOccupation Boys Girls

    Registered Qualified SuccessPercentage Registered Qualified SuccessPercentage1. Agriculture 63688 2131 3.35 20024 126 0.632. Business 62274 3971 6.38 37484 501 1.343. Medical 4732 567 11.98 2335 134 5.744. Engineering 7933 868 10.94 4739 184 3.885. LawPractice 3706 223 6.02 1948 27 1.396. Teaching/Research 22416 1524 6.80 10233 176 1.727. Public/Govt.Service 106821 8100 7.58 54576 1261 2.318. PrivateService 34878 2107 6.04 20131 312 1.559. DefenceServices 10716 513 4.79 5456 39 0.7110.Others 20752 1222 5.89 11642 126 1.0811.Total 337916 21226 6.28 168568 2886 1.71

  • TableA10:QualifiedCandidates:Category& Boys/Girls DistributionRegisteredcandidates:&Boys/Girls Distribution

    Numbers InPercentage:Totalregistered506484Category Boys Girls Total Boys Girls TotalGE 188178 106155 294333 37.15 20.96 58.11OBC 99938 43346 143284 19.73 8.56 28.29SC 35515 13572 49087 7.01 2.68 9.69ST 14285 5495 19780 2.82 1.08 3.91 337916 168568 506484 66.71 33.28 100

    Qualifiedcandidates:&Boys/GirlsDistribution Numbers InPercentage:Totalqualified24112Category Boys Girls Total Boys Girls TotalGE 12831 1851 14682 53.21 7.68 60.89OBC 4415 438 4853 18.31 1.82 20.13SC 3010 455 3465 12.48 1.89 14.37ST 970 142 1112 4.02 0.59 4.61Total 21226 2886 24112 88.03 11.97 100

    CounselledCandidates:Category&&Boys/GirlsDistribution Numbers InPercentage:Totalcounselled17465Category Boys Girls Total Boys Girls TotalGE 7161 874 8035 41.00 5.00 46.01OBC 4415 438 4853 25.28 2.51 27.79SC 3010 455 3465 17.23 2.61 19.84ST 970 142 1112 5.55 0.81 6.37Total 15556 1909 17465 89.07 10.93 100.0

    Admittedcandidates:&Boys/GirlsDistribution Numbers InPercentage:TotalAdmitted9576Category Boys Girls Total Boys Girls TotalGE 4315 449 4764 45.06 4.69 49.75OBC 2416 229 2645 25.23 2.39 27.62SC 1279 163 1442 13.36 1.70 15.06ST 629 96 725 6.57 1.00 7.57Total 8639 937 9576 90.22 9.78 100

  • TableA8: Boardofqualifyingexamination:Registeredcandidates Numbers InPercentageoutoftotalAdmitted506484

    Board GE OBC SC ST Total GE OBC SC ST TotalCBSE 154380 46220 17839 5689 224128 30.48 9.13 3.52 1.12 44.25STATE 121987 92778 29581 13468 257814 24.09 18.32 5.84 2.66 50.90ICSE 15250 2789 1176 491 19706 3.01 0.55 0.23 0.10 3.89OTHERS 2716 1497 491 132 4836 0.54 0.30 0.10 0.03 0.95Total 294333 143284 49087 19780 506484 58.11 28.29 9.69 3.91 100.00

  • TableA9: ExaminationBoard:CandidatesofferedadmissionBoard Numbers InPercentageoutoftotalqualified24112

    Qualified GE OBC SC ST Total GE OBC SC STCBSE 9214 2367 1752 429 13762 38.21 9.82 7.27 1.78STATE 4711 2360 1587 663 9321 19.54 9.79 6.58 2.75ICSE 700 105 114 15 934 2.9 0.44 0.47 0.06OTHERS 57 21 12 5 95 0.24 0.09 0.05 0.02Total 14682 4853 3465 1112 24112 60.89 20.13 14.37 4.61

    Registered GE OBC SC ST Total GE OBC SC STCBSE 154380 46220 17839 5689 224128 30.48 9.13 3.52 1.12STATE 121987 92778 29581 13468 257814 24.09 18.32 5.84 2.66ICSE 15250 2789 1176 491 19706 3.01 0.55 0.23 0.1OTHERS 2716 1497 491 132 4836 0.54 0.3 0.1 0.03Total 294333 143284 49087 19780 506484 58.11 28.29 9.69 3.91

  • TableA7: CandidatesRegistered,Qualified ,admitted &LivingPlaceCandidates'CategorywisenumbersandpercentagesoutoftotalnumbersRegisteredcandidates&Livingplacecategorywise

    Category Village Town City Total Village Town City Total Innumbers InpercentageGeneral 39633 80990 173710 294333 7.83 15.99 34.30 58.11OBC 41655 47913 53716 143284 8.22 9.46 10.61 28.29SC 11544 13772 23771 49087 2.28 2.72 4.69 9.69ST 5518 6884 7378 19780 1.09 1.36 1.46 3.91Total 98350 149559 258575 506484 19.42 29.53 51.05 100.00

    Counselledcandidates&LivingplacecategorywiseCategory Village Town City Total Village Town City Total Innumbers InpercentageGeneral 499 1819 5717 8035 12.73 27.43 59.84 100.00OBC 927 1678 2248 4853 2.86 10.42 32.73 46.01SC 587 949 1929 3465 5.31 9.61 12.87 27.79ST 210 345 557 1112 3.36 5.43 11.04 19.84Total 2223 4791 10451 17465 1.20 1.98 3.19 6.37

    Admittedcandidates&LivingplacecategorywiseCategory Village Town City Total Village Town City Total Innumbers InpercentageGE 294 1095 3375 4764 11.94 27.44 60.62 100.00OBC 479 925 1241 2645 3.07 11.43 35.24 49.75SC 248 387 807 1442 5.00 9.66 12.96 27.62ST 122 221 382 725 2.59 4.04 8.43 15.06Total 1143 2628 5805 9576 1.27 2.31 3.99 7.57

  • TableA13: CandidatesRegistered,Qualified &LivingPlace ZonalWiseNumbersandPercentageOftotalNumbersZone Numbers Outoftotalregistered506484

    (Inpercentage) Village Town City Total Village Town City TotalIITBombay 13264 17779 46279 77322 2.62 3.51 9.14 15.27IITDelhi 9862 14327 50310 74499 1.95 2.83 9.93 14.71IITGuwahati 20565 27590 14005 62160 4.06 5.45 2.77 12.27IITKanpur 14633 18001 50045 82679 2.89 3.55 9.88 16.32IITKharagpur 10438 27183 27741 65362 2.06 5.37 5.48 12.91IITMadras 17188 29235 31547 77970 3.39 5.77 6.23 15.39IITRoorkee 12400 15444 38648 66492 2.45 3.05 7.63 13.13Total 98350 149559 258575 506484 19.42 29.53 51.05 100.00 Outoftotalqualifiedof24112 Village Town City Total Village Town City TotalIITBombay 556 1188 3818 5562 2.31 4.93 15.83 23.07IITDelhi 376 853 2879 4108 1.56 3.54 11.94 17.04IITGuwahati 234 584 462 1280 0.97 2.42 1.92 5.31IITKanpur 232 535 2171 2938 0.96 2.22 9.00 12.18IITKharagpur 216 979 1421 2616 0.90 4.06 5.89 10.85IITMadras 812 1667 2525 5004 3.37 6.91 10.47 20.75IITRoorkee 242 546 1816 2604 1.00 2.26 7.53 10.80Total 2668 6352 15092 24112 11.07 26.34 62.59 100.00

  • TableA15:NumberOfAttempts &CategoryWiseNumbersRegistered

    Fistattemptin2012Fistattemptin2011&2ndattemptin2012

    Fistattemptin2010orearlier

    GE 246198 48048 87OBC 114756 28448 80SC 39446 9596 45ST 15889 3878 13Total 416289 89970 225

    Qualified in2012 in2011 2010GE 9101 5581 0OBC 2393 2459 1SC 1983 1482 0ST 594 518 0Total 14071 10040 1

    AdmissionOffered in2012 in2011 2010GE 2970 1794 0OBC 1297 1348 0SC 799 643 0ST 372 353 0Total 5438 4138 0

  • TableA17:ParentsIncome&CategoryWiseNumbersRegistered

    GE OBC SC ST TotalBelow1Lakh 79485 77873 19087 8860 185305Between1lakhand4.5lakh 154726 61513 24354 9272 249865Above4.5Lakh 60122 3898 5646 1648 71314Total 294333 143284 49087 19780 506484

    QualifiedGE OBC SC ST Total

    Below1Lakh 1816 1757 839 365 4777Between1lakhand4.5lakh 6882 2755 1792 563 11992Above4.5Lakh 5984 341 834 184 7343Total 14682 4853 3465 1112 24112

  • CandidateswhoAppearedInBothPapersNumbers mentioned in the chart Of the 18750 ST candidates attempted JEE, 31.7% were fromare the category wise percentage ofcandidates appeared in IIT-JEE2012 in seven zones.

    pIITB zone. IITB and IIT Kgp zones together contributed morethan 54% of ST candidates.

    Of the 46610 SC candidates attempted JEE, 19.74% werefrom IITK zone

    3

    1

    .

    6

    9

    6

    1

    from IITK zone. Out of 136570 OBC candidates, 18.96% were from IITG zone

    1

    2

    .

    0

    6

    6

    9

    2

    2

    .

    6

    1

    3

    .

    7

    9

    30.00

    35.006

    6

    3

    1

    6

    .

    3

    3

    1

    4

    .

    3

    6

    6

    5

    1

    9

    .

    7

    4

    1

    1

    .

    7

    4

    1

    3

    .

    7

    7

    1

    4

    .

    4

    1

    1

    1

    0

    .

    4

    .

    9

    6

    4

    .

    2

    0 ST

    20.00

    25.00

    30.00

    1

    4

    .

    6

    0

    1

    2

    .

    0

    0

    1

    8

    .

    9

    6

    1

    7

    .

    6

    1

    0

    .

    8

    1

    1

    7

    .

    1

    0

    8

    .

    9

    0

    9

    .

    6

    1

    SC

    10.00

    15.00

    1

    4

    .

    3

    7

    1

    6

    .

    3

    2

    9

    .

    7

    2

    1

    6

    .

    1

    2

    1

    3

    .

    4

    6

    1

    4

    .

    2

    7

    1

    5

    .

    7

    5

    GE

    OBC

    0.00

    5.00

    IITB IITD IITG IITK IITKgp IITM IITR

    GE

    ReferTableA1

  • TableA1: ZoneWiseAndCategoryWise:NumberOfCandidatesAppearedInBothPapersandRespectivePercentages

    Numbers InpercentageZone GE OBC SC ST Total GE OBC SC STIITBombay 39931 19944 7613 5876 73364 14.37 14.60 16.33 31.69IITDelhi 45356 16388 6691 2236 70671 16.32 12.00 14.36 12.06IITGuwahati 27007 25892 4497 1982 59378 9.72 18.96 9.65 10.69IITKanpur 44799 24071 9203 919 78992 16.12 17.63 19.74 4.96IITKharagpur 37404 14766 5471 4191 61832 13.46 10.81 11.74 22.61IITMadras 39654 23353 6417 2557 71981 14.27 17.10 13.77 13.79IITRoorkee 43780 12156 6718 779 63433 15.75 8.90 14.41 4.20Total 277931 136570 46610 18540 479651 100 100 100 100

  • TableA2:CtegorywisenumberofCandidatesQualifiedfromeachZone&Percentages

    Numbers InPercentageZone GE OBC SC ST PD Total GE OBC SC ST PDIITBombay 3249 1055 770 465 23 5562 22.28 22.01 22.26 41.82 13.77IITDelhi 2683 718 517 161 29 4108 18.40 14.98 14.95 14.48 17.37IITGuwahati 528 500 198 36 18 1280 3.62 10.43 5.72 3.24 10.78IITKanpur 1789 567 522 43 17 2938 12.27 11.83 15.09 3.87 10.18IITKharagpur 1541 490 429 132 24 2616 10.57 10.22 12.40 11.87 14.37IITMadras 2996 1129 614 231 34 5004 20.55 23.56 17.75 20.77 20.36IITRoorkee 1795 334 409 44 22 2604 12.31 6.97 11.82 3.96 13.17Total 14581 4793 3459 1112 167 24112 100 100 100 100 100

  • QualifiedCandidates:ZoneWiseTotal qualified : 24112.

    43.8% of the qualified candidates were from IITB(23.03%) and IITM (20 75%)

    41.82% of 1112 qualified ST candidates were from IITB zone and the appearing ST candidates from IITB were 31 6%

    4

    1

    .

    8

    2

    2

    3

    .

    0

    7

    1

    7

    .

    0

    4

    IITM (20.75%) . Total candidates appeared from

    these two zones are 30% only

    from IITB were 31.6%.

    35.0040.0045.00

    2

    2

    .

    2

    6

    1

    4

    .

    4

    8

    1

    5

    .

    3

    1

    1

    2

    .

    1

    8

    1

    0

    .

    8

    5

    2

    0

    .

    7

    5

    0

    .

    8

    0

    20.0025.0030.00

    2

    2

    .

    0

    1

    .

    9

    8

    1

    4

    .

    9

    5

    5

    .

    7

    2

    1

    5

    .

    0

    9

    1

    2

    .

    4

    0

    1

    7

    .

    7

    5

    2

    1

    1

    .

    8

    7

    2

    0

    .

    7

    7

    3

    .

    9

    6

    1

    0

    5.0010.0015.000.00

    2

    2

    .

    2

    8

    1

    8

    .

    4

    0

    1

    4

    .

    1

    0

    .

    4

    3

    1

    1

    .

    8

    3

    1

    0

    .

    2

    2

    2

    3

    .

    5

    6

    1

    1

    1

    .

    8

    2

    0.005.00

    3

    .

    6

    2

    1

    2

    .

    2

    7

    1

    0

    .

    5

    7

    2

    0

    .

    5

    5

    1

    2

    .

    3

    1

    6

    .

    9

    7

    1

    ReferTableA2

  • A3:NumberOfCandidatesRegisterInDifferentExaminationCities

    S.No No.ofRegisteredcandidates

    CumulativePercentage

    CityName

    1 38107 7.53 Patna2 36083 14.67 Delhi3 34176 21.43 Jaipur4 24244 26.22 Hyderabad5 15506 29.29 Lucknow6 15380 32.33 Kanpur7 11786 34.66 Allahabad8 10978 36.83 Vijayawada9 10398 38.88 Ranchi10 10151 40.89 Varanasi11 9528 42.77 Indore12 9289 44.61 Bhopal13 8737 46.34 Chandigarh14 7904 47.90 Visakhapatnam15 7751 49.43 Gorakhpur16 6947 50.81 Mumbai17 6510 52.09 Muzaffarpur18 6011 53.28 Chennai19 5933 54.46 Jabalpur20 5924 55.63 Agra21 5670 56.75 Bhubaneswar22 5050 57.75 Nagpur23 5005 58.74 Sikar24 4955 59.72 Guwahati25 4642 60.63 Kozhikode26 4548 61.53 Gwalior27 4467 62.42 Jamshedpur28 4392 63.28 Dehradun29 4390 64.15 Ahmedabad30 4351 65.01 Bokaro31 4330 65.87 Bangalore32 4027 66.67 Pune33 3930 67.44 Meerut34 3926 68.22 Dhanbad35 3874 68.98 Udaipur36 3831 69.74 Bhilai37 3827 70.50 Raipur38 3815 71.25 Kochi39 3732 71.99 Gurgaon

    S.No No.ofRegisteredcandidates

    CumulativePercentage

    CityName

    40 3538 72.69 Bhagalpur41 3536 73.39 Rohtak42 3514 74.08 Ajmer43 3434 74.76 Bareilly44 3340 75.42 Thiruvananthapuram45 3311 76.08 Warangal46 3191 76.71 Jammu47 3173 77.34 Ghaziabad48 3145 77.96 Jodhpur49 3128 78.58 NaviMumbai50 3073 79.18 Alwar51 3031 79.78 Gaya52 3016 80.38 Jalandhar53 2970 80.97 Kolkata(South)54 2893 81.54 Vadodara55 2862 82.11 Bilaspur56 2841 82.67 Tirupathi57 2825 83.23 Jhansi58 2700 83.76 Bathinda59 2586 84.27 Faridabad60 2513 84.77 Aligarh61 2473 85.26 Kolkata(SaltLake)62 2376 85.73 Roorkee63 2356 86.19 Patiala64 2346 86.66 Guntur65 2167 87.08 Kolkata(North)66 2147 87.51 Kurukshetra67 2146 87.93 Moradabad68 2137 88.36 Amritsar69 2010 88.75 Ludhiana70 1979 89.14 Nellore71 1900 89.52 Thrissur72 1894 89.89 Surat73 1892 90.27 Pantnagar74 1860 90.64 Noida75 1699 90.97 Mathura76 1497 91.27 Rajkot77 1363 91.54 Tiruchirapalli78 1316 91.80 Ujjain

  • A3:NumberOfCandidatesRegisterInDifferentExaminationCities

    S.No No.ofRegisteredcandidates

    CumulativePercentage

    CityName

    79 1288 92.05 Nashik80 1286 92.31 Shimla81 1278 92.56 Ambala82 1274 92.81 Saharanpur83 1265 93.06 Katihar84 1249 93.31 Rourkela85 1240 93.55 Durgapur86 1199 93.79 Panipat87 1177 94.02 Cuttack88 1152 94.25 Palampur89 1098 94.47 Asansol90 1024 94.67 Puducherry91 996 94.87 Aurangabad92 992 95.06 Ballabgarh93 971 95.26 Kharagpur94 959 95.45 Nainital95 954 95.63 Coimbatore96 947 95.82 Bikaner97 921 96.00 Dibrugarh98 901 96.18 Siliguri99 898 96.36 Kurnool100 894 96.54 Mandi101 886 96.71 Raibareilly102 849 96.88 Akola103 848 97.05 Madurai104 838 97.21 Berhampur105 801 97.37 Belur106 796 97.53 Mangalore

    S.No No.ofRegisteredcandidates

    CumulativePercentage

    CityName

    107 786 97.68 Palakkad108 770 97.84 Sambalpur109 735 97.98 Salem110 708 98.12 Balasore111 680 98.26 YamunaNagar112 675 98.39 Itanagar113 628 98.51 Sonipat114 599 98.63 Jorhat115 552 98.74 Solapur116 512 98.84 Tirunelveli117 499 98.94 Kolhapur118 497 99.04 Thane119 494 99.14 Agartala120 444 99.22 Silchar121 429 99.31 Panaji122 399 99.39 Belgaum123 379 99.46 Burdwan124 348 99.53 Tezpur125 331 99.60 Imphal126 322 99.66 PortBlair127 317 99.72 Mysore128 298 99.78 Malda129 298 99.84 Shillong130 237 99.89 Goalpara131 205 99.93 Ratnagiri132 187 99.97 Dubai133 171 100 Gangtok

    Total 505764

  • 50%ofRegisteredCandidatesarefrom15Citiesonly

    85 00

    90.00

    95.00

    100.00

    35000

    40000d

    a

    t

    e

    s

    City

    70.00

    75.00

    80.00

    85.00

    30000

    N

    o

    .

    o

    f

    c

    a

    n

    d

    i

    d

    City(Numberofcandidates

    optedforit)Patna(38107)

    lhi (36083)

    Cumulativepercentage

    55.00

    60.00

    65.0025000

    Delhi(36083)Jaipur (34176)Hyderabad(24244)Lucknow (15506)

    40.00

    45.00

    50.00

    15000

    20000Lucknow (15506)Kanpur(15380)Allahabad(11786)Vijayawada(10978)R hi (10398)

    20 00

    25.00

    30.00

    35.00

    10000

    15000 Ranchi(10398)Varanasi(10151)Indore(9528)Bhopal(9289)

    5.00

    10.00

    15.00

    20.00

    5000

    p ( )Chandigarh(8737)Visakhapatnam(7904)Gorakhpur(7751)

    0.000

    1 4 7

    1

    0

    1

    3

    1

    6

    1

    9

    2

    2

    2

    5

    2

    8

    3

    1

    3

    4

    3

    7

    4

    0

    4

    3

    4

    6

    4

    9

    5

    2

    5

    5

    5

    8

    6

    1

    6

    4

    6

    7

    7

    0

    7

    3

    7

    6

    7

    9

    8

    2

    8

    5

    8

    8

    9

    1

    9

    4

    9

    7

    1

    0

    0

    1

    0

    3

    1

    0

    6

    1

    0

    9

    1

    1

    2

    1

    1

    5

    1

    1

    8

    1

    2

    1

    1

    2

    4

    1

    2

    7

    1

    3

    0

    1

    3

    3

    ReferTableA3

  • A4:NumberofcandidatesqualifiedfromdifferentcitiesSNo

    CityName No.ofCandidatesqualified

    CumulativePercentage

    1 Jaipur 2680 11.112 Hyderabad 2135 19.973 Delhi 2050 28.474 Vijayawada 1062 32.885 Patna 814 36.256 Mumbai 650 38.957 Indore 607 41.468 Kanpur 563 43.809 Bhopal 557 46.1110 Visakhapatnam 555 48.4111 Lucknow 507 50.5112 Chandigarh 470 52.4613 Varanasi 402 54.1314 Chennai 389 55.7415 Nagpur 350 57.2016 Ajmer 342 58.6117 NaviMumbai 341 60.0318 Ranchi 329 61.3919 Sikar 310 62.6820 Bangalore 291 63.8921 Udaipur 281 65.0522 Gwalior 268 66.1623 Pune 243 67.1724 Agra 242 68.1725 Allahabad 212 69.0526 Jabalpur 210 69.9227 Bokaro 204 70.7728 Ahmedabad 201 71.6029 Bhubaneswar 192 72.4030 Jamshedpur 189 73.1831 Kolkata(South) 187 73.9632 Guntur 183 74.7233 Gurgaon 174 75.4434 Faridabad 172 76.1535 Ghaziabad 169 76.8536 Alwar 165 77.5437 Jodhpur 157 78.1938 Jhansi 156 78.8439 Kolkata(Salt 153 79.47

    SNo

    CityName No.ofCandidatesqualified

    CumulativePercentage

    Lake)40 Patiala 148 80.0841 Gorakhpur 145 80.6942 Vadodara 145 81.2943 Nellore 142 81.8844 Warangal 137 82.4445 Noida 132 82.9946 Meerut 131 83.5447 Kochi 127 84.0648 Dhanbad 125 84.5849 Rohtak 124 85.0950 Kurukshetra 120 85.5951 Kozhikode 118 86.0852 Mathura 111 86.5453 Guwahati 109 86.9954 Bhilai 109 87.4555 Bathinda 107 87.8956 Muzaffarpur 105 88.3357 Dehradun 105 88.7658 Bareilly 100 89.1859 Jalandhar 91 89.5560 Durgapur 90 89.9361 Thiruvanantha

    puram89 90.30

    62 Kolkata(North) 87 90.6663 Ujjain 86 91.0164 Surat 85 91.3765 Bikaner 85 91.7266 Tirupathi 83 92.0667 Aligarh 78 92.3968 Ludhiana 76 92.7069 Gaya 72 93.0070 Moradabad 71 93.2971 Raipur 70 93.5872 Panipat 67 93.8673 Aurangabad 67 94.1474 Mangalore 66 94.4175 Bilaspur 65 94.6876 Roorkee 64 94.95

  • A4:NumberofcandidatesqualifiedfromdifferentcitiesSNo

    CityName No.ofCandidatesqualified

    CumulativePercentage

    77 Saharanpur 59 95.1978 Bhagalpur 58 95.4379 Thrissur 53 95.6580 Pantnagar 52 95.8781 Tiruchirapalli 52 96.0882 Nashik 50 96.2983 Rourkela 48 96.4984 Amritsar 44 96.6785 Jammu 40 96.8486 Katihar 40 97.0187 Kharagpur 40 97.1788 Siliguri 40 97.3489 Rajkot 39 97.5090 Sonipat 37 97.6591 Ambala 35 97.8092 Akola 34 97.9493 Thane 33 98.0894 Asansol 31 98.2095 Belur 29 98.3296 Ballabgarh 27 98.4497 Puducherry 26 98.5498 Cuttack 25 98.6599 Panaji 22 98.74100 Sambalpur 20 98.82101 Agartala 19 98.90102 Kurnool 18 98.98103 Raibareilly 16 99.04104 YamunaNagar 16 99.11105 Burdwan 16 99.17

    SNo

    CityName No.ofCandidatesqualified

    CumulativePercentage

    106 Mandi 15 99.24107 Palampur 13 99.29108 Solapur 13 99.34109 Berhampur 12 99.39110 Dibrugarh 11 99.44111 Balasore 11 99.49112 Nainital 10 99.53113 Belgaum 10 99.57114 Mysore 10 99.61115 Malda 10 99.65116 Coimbatore 9 99.69117 Silchar 9 99.73118 Shimla 8 99.76119 Ratnagiri 8 99.79120 Madurai 7 99.82121 Kolhapur 7 99.85122 Dubai 7 99.88123 Itanagar 5 99.90124 Jorhat 5 99.92125 Palakkad 4 99.94126 Tezpur 4 99.95127 Shillong 4 99.97128 Goalpara 3 99.98129 Salem 2 99.99130 Tirunelveli 1 100.00131 Imphal 1 100.00132 PortBlair 0 100.00133 Gangtok 0 100.00134 24112

  • 50%ofQualifiedCandidatesarefrom11Citiesonly

    90 00

    100.003000

    Totalcandidatesqualified:24112EXAMCITY(numberof

    80.00

    90.00

    2500

    Citieswithmaximumlif i did t i

    (candidatesoptedfor it)Patna(38107)Delhi(36083)

    60.00

    70.002000

    qualifying candidatesindescendingorderJaipurHyderabad

    Jaipur (34176)Hyderabad(24244)Lucknow (15506)

    40 00

    50.001500

    HyderabadDelhiVijayawadaPatna

    Kanpur(15380)Allahabad(11786)Vijayawada(10978)R hi (10398)

    30.00

    40.00

    1000

    PatnaMumbaiIndoreKanpur

    Ranchi(10398)Varanasi(10151)Indore(9528)Bhopal (9289)

    10.00

    20.00500

    KanpurBhopalVisakhapatnamLucknow

    Bhopal(9289)Chandigarh(8737)Visakhapatnam(7904)Gorakhpur (7751)

    0.000

    1 4 7

    1

    0

    1

    3

    1

    6

    1

    9

    2

    2

    2

    5

    2

    8

    3

    1

    3

    4

    3

    7

    4

    0

    4

    3

    4

    6

    4

    9

    5

    2

    5

    5

    5

    8

    6

    1

    6

    4

    6

    7

    7

    0

    7

    3

    7

    6

    7

    9

    8

    2

    8

    5

    8

    8

    9

    1

    9

    4

    9

    7

    1

    0

    0

    1

    0

    3

    1

    0

    6

    1

    0

    9

    1

    1

    2

    1

    1

    5

    1

    1

    8

    1

    2

    1

    1

    2

    4

    1

    2

    7

    1

    3

    0

    Gorakhpur(7751)

    ReferTablesA3&A4

  • GenderDistributionofCandidatesAttemptedIITJEE2012ZoneWise

    Zone Boys Girls %Boys %Girls

    IITBombay 55123 18241 75.14 24.86IITDelhi 50689 19982 71.73 28.27IITGuwahati 43248 16130 72.84 27.16IITKanpur 56117 22875 71.04 28.96pIITKharagpur 39998 21834 64.69 35.31IIT Madras 41747 30234 58 00 42 00IITMadras 41747 30234 58.00 42.00IITRoorkee 42298 21135 66.68 33.32Total 329220 150431 68.64 31.36

  • TableA6:ZoneWiseDistributionOfRegistered,QualifiedAndCounselledCandidatesAccordingToThePreparationMethod Appeared Qualified Counselled Totalappeared47651 Totalqualified24112 TotalCounselled

    (inNumbers) (InPercentage) (inNumbers) (InPercentage) (inNumbers) (InPercentage)Zone SelfStudy

    (SS)Others(OM)

    SS OM SS OM SS OM SS OM SS OMIITBombay 56655 16709 11.81 3.48 2913 2649 12.08 10.99 2253 1987 12.90 11.38IITDelhi 54495 16176 11.36 3.37 2031 2077 8.42 8.61 1427 1479 8.17 8.47IITGuwahati 49056 10322 10.23 2.15 731 549 3.03 2.28 551 420 3.15 2.40IITKanpur 64737 14255 13.50 2.97 1534 1404 6.36 5.82 1101 1001 6.30 5.73IITKharagpur 51442 10390 10.72 2.17 1624 992 6.74 4.11 1147 716 6.57 4.10IITMadras 51524 20457 10.74 4.26 2516 2488 10.43 10.32 1852 1814 10.60 10.39IITRoorkee 52870 10563 11.02 2.20 1518 1086 6.30 4.50 969 748 5.55 4.28Total 380779 98872 79.39 20.61 12867 11245 53.36 46.64 9300 8165 53.25 46.75

  • PREPARATIONFORIITJEE2012:SelfStudy&OtherMethodsRegistered Qualified Success IMPACT OF COACHING BY PROFESSIONALSRegistered Qualified Success

    IITM AOM 4.26% 506484 21576 10.32% of24114 2513 11.62%ASS 10.74 % 506484 54396 10.43% of24114 2513 4.59%

    IITD AOM 3.37% 506484 18947 8.61% of24114 2076 10.95%

    The type of preparation for IIT-JEE adopted by the candidates : Self Study (SS) or Other Methods (OM).

    Total 98872 candidates ticked OM and out f th 11245 did t lifi d

    ASS 11.36% 506484 57435 8.42% of24114 2030 3.53%of these 11245 candidates qualified.

    Total 380779 candidates ticked SS and out of these 12867 qualified. The success rates are: 11.37% and 3.37% for OM and SS respectively

    1

    3

    .

    5

    0

    7

    2

    1

    0

    .

    7

    4

    3

    1

    1

    .

    0

    2

    0

    SS respectively. Other Method means that we can presume it as some sort of professional coaching.

    10.00

    12.00

    14.00

    1

    1

    .

    3

    6

    2

    1

    0

    .

    2

    3

    1

    6

    1

    0

    .

    7

    6

    .

    7

    4

    5

    7

    1

    1

    0

    .

    4

    3

    1

    0

    .

    6

    0

    1

    0

    .

    3

    2

    1

    0

    .

    3

    9

    6

    .

    3

    0

    2

    .

    2

    0

    5

    0

    IITR4.00

    6.00

    8.00

    1

    1

    .

    8

    1

    1

    2

    .

    0

    8

    1

    2

    .

    9

    0

    9

    9

    8

    .

    4

    2

    8

    .

    1

    7

    .

    6

    1

    6

    .

    3

    6

    6

    .

    3

    0

    2

    .

    9

    7

    5

    .

    8

    2

    .

    7

    3

    6

    .

    5

    2

    .

    1

    7

    4

    .

    1

    1

    4

    .

    1

    0

    4

    .

    2

    6

    1 2

    4

    .

    5

    4

    .

    2

    8

    P

    e

    r

    c

    e

    n

    t

    a

    g

    e

    IITKIITKg

    IITM

    0.00

    2.00

    4.00

    3

    .

    4

    8

    1

    0

    .

    9

    1

    1

    .

    3

    8

    3

    .

    3

    7

    8

    .

    8

    .

    4

    7

    2

    .

    1

    5

    2

    .

    2

    8

    2

    .

    4

    0

    2

    5

    In IITB and IITM zones, the self study candidates could succeed in the same proportion as they appeared

    IITB

    IITD

    IITG

    ReferTableA6

    same proportion as they appeared. In other zones the performance of self

    study candidates is bad.

  • TableA7:Candidates'categoryandLivingplacesuccesspercentagesRegisteredcandidates&Livingplacecategorywise

    Category Village Town City Total Village Town City Total Innumbers InpercentageGeneral 39633 80990 173710 294333 7.83 15.99 34.30 58.11OBC 41655 47913 53716 143284 8.22 9.46 10.61 28.29SC 11544 13772 23771 49087 2.28 2.72 4.69 9.69ST 5518 6884 7378 19780 1.09 1.36 1.46 3.91Total 98350 149559 258575 506484 19.42 29.53 51.05 100.00

    Counselledcandidates&LivingplacecategorywiseCategory Village Town City Total Village Town City Total Innumbers InpercentageGeneral 499 1819 5717 8035 12.73 27.43 59.84 100.00OBC 927 1678 2248 4853 2.86 10.42 32.73 46.01SC 587 949 1929 3465 5.31 9.61 12.87 27.79ST 210 345 557 1112 3.36 5.43 11.04 19.84Total 2223 4791 10451 17465 1.20 1.98 3.19 6.37

    Admittedcandidates&LivingplacecategorywiseCategory Village Town City Total Village Town City Total Innumbers InpercentageGE 294 1095 3375 4764 11.94 27.44 60.62 100.00OBC 479 925 1241 2645 3.07 11.43 35.24 49.75SC 248 387 807 1442 5.00 9.66 12.96 27.62ST 122 221 382 725 2.59 4.04 8.43 15.06Total 1143 2628 5805 9576 1.27 2.31 3.99 7.57

  • 50.00

    60.00

    1

    .

    0

    5

    Category&Livingplace 19.42% of candidates registered are from villages In qualifying numbers the village background candidates are only 12.7%.

    Out of total registered candidates 7 83% and 15 99% of

    30.00

    40.00

    5

    1

    3

    4

    .

    3

    0

    Out of total registered candidates 7.83% and 15.99% of are GE category from villages and towns background, respectively.

    Out of total qualified candidates the percentages of candidates from village and town background are 2 86%

    City10.00

    20.00

    1

    9

    .

    4

    2

    7 83 8 22

    29.53

    15.99 9.46

    2.72 1 36

    1

    0

    .

    6

    1

    4.69 1.46

    candidates from village and town background are 2.86% 11.43%, respectively.

    On the other hand the SC, OBC and ST living cities gained. GE(cities) appeared - 34.30% qualified 32.73 SC (cities) appeared - 4 69%; qualified 11 04%

    VillageTown

    0.00

    Total GE OBC SC ST

    7.83 8.222.28 1.09

    2.72 1.36 SC (cities) appeared - 4.69%; qualified 11.04% OBC(cities) appeared- 10.61%; qualified 12.87% ST (cities ) appeared- 1.46%; qualified 3.19% RESERVATION HELPED CATEGORY CANDIDATES LIVING

    IN CITIES ONLY

    60.00

    70.00

    6

    2

    5

    9

    .

    8

    4

    IN CITIES ONLY

    30 00

    40.00

    50.00

    6

    0

    .

    6

    5

    .

    2

    4 40.00

    50.00

    60.00

    3

    2

    .

    7

    3

    TownCity10.00

    20.00

    30.00

    11.943.07 5 00

    2

    7

    .

    4

    4

    1

    1

    .

    4

    3

    9

    .

    6

    6

    4.04 2.31

    3

    5

    12.968.43

    3

    .

    9

    9

    TownCity

    10.00

    20.00

    30.00

    2

    .

    7

    3

    2

    7

    .

    4

    3

    1

    0

    .

    4

    2

    9

    .

    6

    1

    5.43 1.98

    3

    1

    2

    .

    8

    7

    1

    1

    .

    0

    4

    3.19

    Village0.00Total GE OBC SC ST

    5.00 2.59 1.27

    VillaTown

    0.00Total GE OBC SC ST

    1

    2 2.86 5.31 3.36 1.20

    ReferTableA7

  • TableA12 : ZoneWiseDistributionOfRegistered,QualifiedAndCounselledCandidatesAccordingTotheLanguageOfQuestionPaperUsed

    TotalAppeared47651 TotalQualified24112 Total Counselled 17465

    In numbers In Percentage In numbers In Percentage In numbers Zone English QP

    Hindi QP

    English QP

    Hindi QP

    English QP

    Hindi QP

    English QP

    Hindi QP

    English QP

    Hindi QP

    English QP

    Hindi QP

    IITBombay 50125 23239 10.45 4.84 4728 834 19.61 3.46 3479 761 19.92 4.36IITDelhi 59151 11520 12.33 2.40 3745 363 15.53 1.51 2577 329 14.76 1.88IITGuwahati 56903 2475 11.86 0.52 1280 0 5.31 0.00 971 0 5.56 0.00IITKanpur 57181 21811 11.92 4.55 2826 112 11.72 0.46 2007 95 11.49 0.54IITKharagpur 58121 3711 12.12 0.77 2609 7 10.82 0.03 1856 7 10.63 0.04IITMadras 71973 8 15.01 0.00 5004 0 20.75 0.00 3666 0 20.99 0.00IITRoorkee 56339 7094 11.75 1.48 2570 34 10.66 0.14 1686 31 9.65 0.18Total 409793 69858 85.44 14.56 22762 1350 94.40 5.60 16242 1223 93.00 7.00

  • TableA8:Boardofqualifyingexamination:Registeredcandidates Numbers InPercentageoutoftotalAdmitted506484

    Board GE OBC SC ST Total GE OBC SC ST TotalCBSE 154380 46220 17839 5689 224128 30.48 9.13 3.52 1.12 44.25STATE 121987 92778 29581 13468 257814 24.09 18.32 5.84 2.66 50.90ICSE 15250 2789 1176 491 19706 3.01 0.55 0.23 0.10 3.89OTHERS 2716 1497 491 132 4836 0.54 0.30 0.10 0.03 0.95Total 294333 143284 49087 19780 506484 58.11 28.29 9.69 3.91 100.00

  • BoardofQualifyingExamination:Registeredcandidates

    60 00

    TotalRegistered:506484 44.25% of the registered candidatespassed the qualifying examinationf f

    50.00

    60.00

    5

    8

    .

    1

    1

    5

    0

    .

    9

    0

    2

    5

    from CBSE. Out of this 30.48% wereGE category

    50% of the registered candidateswere from State boards but only

    f h

    30.00

    40.002

    9

    9

    .

    4

    8

    4

    4

    .

    2 24% of them are GE.It implies category candidates aremostly from state boards.

    Total10.00

    20.00

    9.69

    2

    8

    .

    2

    1

    8

    .

    3

    2

    9

    .

    1

    3

    2

    4

    .

    0

    9

    3

    0

    3.01

    3.89

    0.95

    ST

    OBC0.00

    Total STATE CBSE ICSE

    3.91 2.661.12

    0.100.03

    5.843.52

    0.23 0.10

    9

    0.550.30

    0.54

    ICSEOTHERS

    ReferTableA8

  • TableA9ExaminationBoard:CandidatesofferedadmissionBoard Numbers InPercentageoutoftotalqualified24112

    Qualified GE OBC SC ST Total GE OBC SC STCBSE 9214 2367 1752 429 13762 38.21 9.82 7.27 1.78STATE 4711 2360 1587 663 9321 19.54 9.79 6.58 2.75ICSE 700 105 114 15 934 2.9 0.44 0.47 0.06OTHERS 57 21 12 5 95 0.24 0.09 0.05 0.02Total 14682 4853 3465 1112 24112 60.89 20.13 14.37 4.61

    Registered GE OBC SC ST Total GE OBC SC STCBSE 154380 46220 17839 5689 224128 30.48 9.13 3.52 1.12STATE 121987 92778 29581 13468 257814 24.09 18.32 5.84 2.66ICSE 15250 2789 1176 491 19706 3.01 0.55 0.23 0.1OTHERS 2716 1497 491 132 4836 0.54 0.3 0.1 0.03Total 294333 143284 49087 19780 506484 58.11 28.29 9.69 3.91

  • ExaminationBoard:Candidatesofferedadmission h i l d bl d if h

    10000 95

    7

    6

    The success rate is nearly doubled if thecandidates has done qualifyingexamination(QE) from CBSE. Out of the 506484total candidates registered, 9.13% and 18.32 %of them are OBC who passed QE from CBSE and

    7000

    8000

    9000

    10000

    5

    of them are OBC who passed QE from CBSE andState Boards respectively.

    The contribution of these candidates to qualifiednumbers are: 9.82% and 9.79% respectively.

    It implies the success rate of OBC candidates nearly

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    6

    4

    5

    4

    7

    6

    4

    3

    0

    5

    4

    0

    8

    5

    3

    6

    5

    3

    8

    8

    6

    2

    9

    4

    3

    1

    p ydoubles if the candidate passed from CBSE.

    50 00

    60.00

    70.00

    6

    0

    .

    8

    9

    SCOBC

    GE

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    725271 445

    7 2

    1442

    708 683 47 4

    2

    1

    3

    3

    2

    1

    2

    5

    0

    52 11

    3

    1

    5

    0

    188 14

    30.00

    40.00

    50.00

    4

    3

    8

    .

    2

    1

    2

    0

    .

    1

    3

    3

    7

    4 61

    STTotal CBSE STATE ICSE OTHERS

    7

    STATE

    CBSE

    Total

    10.00

    20.00

    2.900.44 0 47

    1

    9

    .

    5

    4

    9

    .

    7

    9

    6.582.75

    9

    .

    8

    2

    7.271.78

    2

    1

    4

    .

    3 4.61

    OTHERS

    ICSE0.00GE

    OBCSC

    ST

    0.240.09 0.05

    0.02

    0.470.06

    ReferTableA9

  • TableA10QualifiedCandidates:Category&MaleFemaleDistributionRegisteredcandidates:MaleFemaleDistribution

    Numbers InPercentage:Totalregistered506484Category Boys Girls Total Boys Girls TotalGE 188178 106155 294333 37.15 20.96 58.11OBC 99938 43346 143284 19.73 8.56 28.29SC 35515 13572 49087 7.01 2.68 9.69ST 14285 5495 19780 2.82 1.08 3.91 337916 168568 506484 66.71 33.28 100 Qualifiedcandidates:MaleFemaleDistribution Numbers InPercentage:Totalqualified24112Category Boys Girls Total Boys Girls TotalGE 12831 1851 14682 53.21 7.68 60.89OBC 4415 438 4853 18.31 1.82 20.13SC 3010 455 3465 12.48 1.89 14.37ST 970 142 1112 4.02 0.59 4.61Total 21226 2886 24112 88.03 11.97 100 CounselledCandidates:Category&MaleFemaleDistribution Numbers InPercentage:Totalcounselled17465Category Boys Girls Total Boys Girls TotalGE 7161 874 8035 41.00 5.00 46.01OBC 4415 438 4853 25.28 2.51 27.79SC 3010 455 3465 17.23 2.61 19.84ST 970 142 1112 5.55 0.81 6.37Total 15556 1909 17465 89.07 10.93 100.0Admittedcandidates:MaleFemaleDistribution Numbers InPercentage:TotalAdmitted9576Category Boys Girls Total Boys Girls TotalGE 4315 449 4764 45.06 4.69 49.75OBC 2416 229 2645 25.23 2.39 27.62SC 1279 163 1442 13.36 1.70 15.06ST 629 96 725 6.57 1.00 7.57Total 8639 937 9576 90.22 9.78 100

  • 0.

    0

    0

    100 00

    8

    8

    .

    0

    3

    1

    0

    0

    .

    0

    0

    60 00

    80.00

    100.00

    5

    1

    3

    3

    .

    2

    8

    6

    6

    .

    7

    2

    1

    0

    60.00

    80.00

    100.00

    7 68 3.

    2

    1

    6

    0

    .

    8

    9

    1

    1

    .

    9

    7

    1

    GETotal

    20.00

    40.00

    60.00

    2.687 01 9 69

    8

    .

    5

    6

    1

    9

    .

    7

    3

    2

    8

    .

    2

    9

    2

    0

    .

    9

    6

    3

    7

    .

    1

    5

    5

    8

    .

    1

    1

    3

    SC

    OBC

    GE

    Total

    20.00

    40.00

    0 59

    1

    .

    8

    9

    1

    2

    .

    4

    8

    1

    4

    .

    3

    7

    1

    .

    8

    2

    1

    8

    .

    3

    1

    2

    0

    .

    1

    3

    7.68

    5

    ST

    SCOBC

    0.001.08 2.82 3.91

    7.01 9.69ST

    SC0.00

    0.59 4.02 4.61

    1

    MaleFemaleRegistered,

    100.00

    8

    9

    .

    0

    7

    1

    0

    0

    .

    0

    0

    9

    0

    .

    2

    2

    1

    0

    0

    .

    0

    0

    Registered,Qualified,

    Counselled&Admitted

    60.00

    80.00

    5

    .

    0

    0

    4

    1

    .

    0

    0

    4

    6

    .

    0

    1

    1

    0

    .

    9

    3

    Total80.00

    100.00

    4

    .

    6

    9

    4

    5

    .

    0

    6

    4

    9

    .

    7

    5

    9

    .

    7

    8

    9

    SC

    OBCGE

    Total

    20.00

    40.00

    0.81 5.55 6.37

    2

    .

    6

    1

    1

    7

    .

    2

    3

    1

    9

    .

    8

    4

    2

    .

    5

    1

    2

    5

    .

    2

    8

    2

    7

    .

    7

    9

    5

    4

    SC

    OBC

    GE

    Total

    20.00

    40.00

    60.00

    1

    .

    7

    0

    1

    3

    .

    3

    6

    1

    5

    .

    0

    6

    2

    .

    3

    9

    2

    5

    .

    2

    3

    2

    7

    .

    6

    2

    4

    4

    ST

    SC0.00

    6.37

    ST

    SC0.00

    1.00 6.57 7.57

    1

    ReferTableA10

  • TableA11:ZoneWiseDistributionOfRegistered,QualifiedAndCounselledCandidatesAccordingToParentsEducationalQualifications Appeared Qualified Counselled Totalappearedcandidates47651 Totalqualified24112 Totalcounselled17465

    Zone (Numbers) (inpercentages) (Numbers) (inpercentages) (Numbers) (inpercentages) BG OG NG BG OG NG BG OG NG BG OG NG BG OG NG BG OG NGIITBombay 25128 25178 23058 5.24 5.25 4.81 2749 1766 1047 10.95 7.03 4.17 1883 1453 904 10.78 8.32 5.18IITDelhi 27906 22931 19834 5.82 4.78 4.14 2213 1209 686 8.81 4.81 2.73 1374 950 582 7.87 5.44 3.33IITGuwahati 13961 22453 22964 2.91 4.68 4.79 434 495 351 1.73 1.97 1.40 284 392 295 1.63 2.24 1.69IITKanpur 29001 29213 20778 6.05 6.09 4.33 1553 923 462 6.18 3.68 1.84 1000 720 382 5.73 4.12 2.19IITKharagpur 22391 21689 17752 4.67 4.52 3.70 1287 819 510 5.13 3.26 2.03 829 607 427 4.75 3.48 2.44IITMadras 26448 22295 23238 5.51 4.65 4.84 2530 1421 1053 10.07 5.66 4.19 1721 1093 852 9.85 6.26 4.88IITRoorkee 24256 19557 19620 5.06 4.08 4.09 1486 651 467 5.92 2.59 1.86 888 466 363 5.08 2.67 2.08Total 169091 163316 147244 35.25 34.05 30.70 12252 7284 4576 48.79 29.01 18.22 7979 5681 3805 45.69 32.53 21.79

  • ParentsEducationalQualification:Registered,Qualified&CounselledParentsEducationalQualification:Registered,Qualified&CounselledBothParentsGraduateBG OneoftheparentsGraduateOG NoneoftheparentsGraduateNGParents Educational Qualifications 15.3 % of appeared candidates were from IITB zone. Out of these, candidates with BG,OG and NG are 5.24%,5.25% and 4.8% respectively. 22.14 % of the qualified candidates were from IITB zone and out of these candidates with BG,OG,NG are 10.95%, 7.03% and 4.17%

    respectively. It implies that the candidates with both parents graduates performed well. The same trend is seen in other zones also. In IITG zone candidates with BG are less than the candidates with either OG or NG In IITG zone candidates with BG are less than the candidates with either OG or NG. In IITB and IITM zones the candidates with BG performed exceptionally well as the percentages of qualified candidates were nearly two times

    the appeared percentages. In other zones the percentage of appeared is nearly same or slightly less than that of qualified.

    12.00 9.

    8

    5

    0

    5

    9

    5

    .

    5

    1

    5

    .

    0

    6

    1

    0

    .

    0

    7

    5

    .

    9

    2

    AllzonesaverageBG 45.70OG 32.50NG:21.80

    AllzonesaverageBG 48.80OG 29.00NG 18.20

    AllzonesaverageAllzonesaverageBG:35.25OG:34.05NG:30.70

    8.00

    10.00

    1

    0

    .

    7

    8

    7

    .

    8

    7

    5

    .

    7

    3

    4

    .

    7

    5

    6

    .

    2

    6

    4

    .

    8

    8

    5

    .

    0

    8

    2

    .

    6

    7

    0

    8

    5.00

    6.00

    7.00

    5

    .

    8

    2

    4

    .

    7

    8

    4

    .

    6

    8

    4

    .

    7

    9

    6

    .

    0

    6

    .

    0

    9

    4

    .

    3

    3

    4

    .

    5

    2

    3

    .

    7

    0

    4

    .

    6

    5

    4

    .

    8

    4

    4

    .

    0

    9

    10.00

    12.00

    1

    0

    .

    9

    5

    8

    .

    8

    1

    6

    .

    1

    8

    5

    .

    1

    3

    2

    6

    5

    .

    6

    6

    4

    .

    1

    9

    1

    .

    8

    6

    P

    e

    r

    c

    e

    n

    t

    a

    g

    e

    IITK

    IITKg

    IITMIITR

    4.00

    6.00

    8

    .

    3

    2

    5

    .

    1

    8

    5

    .

    4

    4

    .

    3

    3

    9

    4

    .

    1

    2

    2

    .

    1

    9

    4

    3

    .

    4

    8

    2

    .

    4

    4

    2

    2

    .

    0

    IITKIITKg

    IITM

    2 00

    3.00

    4.00

    5

    .

    2

    4

    5

    .

    2

    5

    4

    .

    8

    1

    4

    .

    1

    4

    IITK

    IITKg

    IITM

    4.00

    6.00

    8.00

    7

    .

    0

    3

    4

    .

    8

    1

    1

    .

    9

    7

    4

    0

    3

    .

    6

    8

    1

    .

    8

    4

    3

    .

    2

    2

    .

    0

    3

    IITB

    IITD

    IITGIITK

    0.00

    2.00

    5

    3

    .

    1

    .

    6

    9

    IITB

    IITD

    IITGIITK

    0.00

    1.00

    2.00

    BGIITB

    IITD

    IITG

    0.00

    2.00

    BG

    4

    .

    1

    7

    2

    .

    7

    3

    1

    .

    4

    BG OG NGBG OG NG

    BGOG

    NG

    No.ofcandidatesappeared:479651 No.ofcandidatesQualified 24112 No.candidatescounselled 17465ReferTableA11

  • TableA12:ZoneWiseDistributionOfRegistered,QualifiedAndCounselledCandidatesAccordingTotheLanguageOfQuestionPaperUsed

    Registered Qualified CounselledZone QPin

    EnglishQPinHindi

    Totalappeared47651

    (InPercentage)QPinEnglish

    QPinHindi

    Totalqualified24112

    (InPerc


M5 Report Basics - Pennsylvania Forms/M5 Administration Team... · M5 Report Basics • Agenda Introduction Selecting A Report Report Filters Schedule a Report View a Report Report

M5 Report Basics - Pennsylvania Forms/M5 Administration Team... · M5 Report Basics • Agenda Introduction Selecting A Report Report Filters Schedule a Report View a Report Report

draisgroup.com€¦ · Robb Report China Robb Report India Robb Report Kazakhstan Robb Report Korea Robb Report Russia Robb Report Singapore Robb Report Spain Robb Report Turkey Robb

draisgroup.com€¦ · Robb Report China Robb Report India Robb Report Kazakhstan Robb Report Korea Robb Report Russia Robb Report Singapore Robb Report Spain Robb Report Turkey Robb

Report-Report Interface

Report-Report Interface

Realtor Report Realtor®Report Realtor®Report

Realtor Report Realtor®Report Realtor®Report

Annual Report 2018 - 2019 · annual report 2018-2019 3 contents chairman’s report 4 ceo report 7 financial report 10 directors report 12

Annual Report 2018 - 2019 · annual report 2018-2019 3 contents chairman’s report 4 ceo report 7 financial report 10 directors report 12

report report

report report

FINAL REPORT (MAIN REPORT) FINAL REPORT (MAIN REPORT)open_jicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/12005583_01.pdf · FINAL REPORT (MAIN REPORT) September 2010 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY

FINAL REPORT (MAIN REPORT) FINAL REPORT (MAIN REPORT)open_jicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/12005583_01.pdf · FINAL REPORT (MAIN REPORT) September 2010 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY

Annual Report Sustainability Report 20€¦ · Annual Report Sustainability Report 20 1 8. Annual Report Sustainability Report. ITALMOBILIARE Società per Azioni Head Office: Via

Annual Report Sustainability Report 20€¦ · Annual Report Sustainability Report 20 1 8. Annual Report Sustainability Report. ITALMOBILIARE Società per Azioni Head Office: Via

Analysis Report Review Report Title: REPORT DRAFT 4 Report ...

Analysis Report Review Report Title: REPORT DRAFT 4 Report ...

Swati Project Report Swati Project Report Swati Project Report Swati Project Report Swati Project Report Swati Project Report Swati Project Report Swati Project Report Swati Project

Swati Project Report Swati Project Report Swati Project Report Swati Project Report Swati Project Report Swati Project Report Swati Project Report Swati Project Report Swati Project

Report Report Groupe

Report Report Groupe

Director’s Report Director’s Report Director’s Report · Director’s Report Annual Report 2018 Director’s Report Director’s Report 12 Annual Report 2018. ... branded entertainment

Director’s Report Director’s Report Director’s Report · Director’s Report Annual Report 2018 Director’s Report Director’s Report 12 Annual Report 2018. ... branded entertainment

Life-Cycle Energy Costs and Greenhouse Gas … Energy Costs and Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Gas Turbine Power April, 2002 report report report report report report report report report

Life-Cycle Energy Costs and Greenhouse Gas … Energy Costs and Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Gas Turbine Power April, 2002 report report report report report report report report report

ARIZONA CRASH REPORT Agency Report Number REPORT ID

ARIZONA CRASH REPORT Agency Report Number REPORT ID

option’s annual report 2003 Report 2003_UK.pdf · management report financial report us gaap financial report belgian gaap option’s annual report 2003 2003-----

option’s annual report 2003 Report 2003_UK.pdf · management report financial report us gaap financial report belgian gaap option’s annual report 2003 2003-----

Training Report, Thermal Power Plant Report, KSTPS Report

Training Report, Thermal Power Plant Report, KSTPS Report

Newman Questionnaire Report 2015 Newman Questionnaire Report Report... · Newman Questionnaire Report 2015 Newman Questionnaire Report ... Newman Questionnaire Report 2015 ... The

Newman Questionnaire Report 2015 Newman Questionnaire Report Report... · Newman Questionnaire Report 2015 Newman Questionnaire Report ... Newman Questionnaire Report 2015 ... The

Report Quick Report

Report Quick Report

REPORT REPORT TO: REPORT FROM: REPORT NO.: RE: …

REPORT REPORT TO: REPORT FROM: REPORT NO.: RE: …

AAAA Project Project Report Report Report OnOOnnOn REMOVAL ...

AAAA Project Project Report Report Report OnOOnnOn REMOVAL ...