J.C. Celaro, Rosa L. Finamor, C. Brandao and R. Ghidini

9
STATIC FUMIGATION WITH PHOSPHINE IN LARGE ELEVATORS J.C. Celaro, Rosa L. Finamor, C. Brandao and R. Ghidini Companhia Estadual de Silos e Armazens, Porto Alegre, Brazil Abstract Phosphine fumigation in s~los dur~ng transfer from b~n to b~n involves energy loss, wear and tear of transport mach~nery, gra~n breakage and requires the avai Labi Li t.y of empty baris, In flat storage structures the problem is more acute due to uneven d~stribution of the phosph~ne tablets and slowness of the appl~cat~on. Static fum~gat~on trials were carr~ed out ~n order to develop a more practical and econom~c method for fum~gation w~th phosph~ne, and the eff~ciency of gas l~beration and ~ts rate of diffusion through the bulk were determined. The trials were carr~ed out between July 1984 and January 1985 in concrete bins 35.5 m h~gh and 15 m d~ameter. They conta~ned wheat and corn infested with Tribolium castaneum and Sitophilus oryzae. Pellets were d~stributed at the upper gra~n surface to obta~n an overall dose rate of 1 g a.i. phosphine per ton. The results very clearly demonstrated the eff aci.ent; act.i.onof phosphine at the different depths of the bins. It was shown that the rates at which the gas penetrated to the bottom of the bins was d~fferent for wheat and corn. For stat~c fumigat10n of each 4 800 ton capacity bin, a sav~ng of the order of US$ 579 was calculated, exclusive of saving on reduct10n 1n breakage and full ut~l~zation of the bins. Introduction The increas~ng demand for storage space in Brazil, especially for storage of wheat, soybeans, rice and corn have st~mulated the construction of large silos and grain storehouses W1th capacat.a es ranging from ten thousand to a hundred thousand tons. The need for phytosanitary control measures in these installations was the reason for ~nitiation of recent research studies. The disadvantages of fum~gating with phosphine during grain transfer from bin to ba.n, or when a bin is being loaded include handling problems, power waste, wear and tear of equipment, grain breakage, and an the case of flat warehouse storage, uneven tablet distr1bution and manpower problems when us~ng probes. 519 Proc. 4th Int. Work Conf Stored-Product Protection, Tel AVIV, Israel, Sept 1986 [Eds E Donahaye and S Navarro], pp 519-527

Transcript of J.C. Celaro, Rosa L. Finamor, C. Brandao and R. Ghidini

Page 1: J.C. Celaro, Rosa L. Finamor, C. Brandao and R. Ghidini

STATIC FUMIGATION WITH PHOSPHINE IN LARGE ELEVATORS

J.C. Celaro, Rosa L. Finamor, C. Brandao and R. GhidiniCompanhia Estadual de Silos e Armazens, Porto Alegre, Brazil

Abstract

Phosphine fumigation in s~los dur~ng transfer from b~n to b~n involvesenergy loss, wear and tear of transport mach~nery, gra~n breakage andrequires the avai Labi Lit.y of empty baris, In flat storage structuresthe problem is more acute due to uneven d~stribution of the phosph~netablets and slowness of the appl~cat~on.

Static fum~gat~on trials were carr~ed out ~n order to develop amore practical and econom~c method for fum~gation w~th phosph~ne, andthe eff~ciency of gas l~beration and ~ts rate of diffusion through thebulk were determined.

The trials were carr~ed out between July 1984 and January 1985 inconcrete bins 35.5 m h~gh and 15 m d~ameter. They conta~ned wheat andcorn infested with Tribolium castaneum and Sitophilus oryzae. Pelletswere d~stributed at the upper gra~n surface to obta~n an overall doserate of 1 g a.i. phosphine per ton.

The results very clearly demonstrated the eff aci.ent; act.i.onofphosphine at the different depths of the bins. It was shown that therates at which the gas penetrated to the bottom of the bins wasd~fferent for wheat and corn. For stat~c fumigat10n of each 4 800 toncapacity bin, a sav~ng of the order of US$ 579 was calculated,exclusive of saving on reduct10n 1n breakage and full ut~l~zation ofthe bins.

Introduction

The increas~ng demand for storage space in Brazil, especially forstorage of wheat, soybeans, rice and corn have st~mulated theconstruction of large silos and grain storehouses W1th capacat.aesranging from ten thousand to a hundred thousand tons. The need forphytosanitary control measures in these installations was the reasonfor ~nitiation of recent research studies.

The disadvantages of fum~gating with phosphine during graintransfer from bin to ba.n, or when a bin is being loaded includehandling problems, power waste, wear and tear of equipment, grainbreakage, and an the case of flat warehouse storage, uneven tabletdistr1bution and manpower problems when us~ng probes.

519

Proc. 4th Int. Work Conf Stored-Product Protection, Tel AVIV, Israel, Sept 1986[Eds E Donahaye and S Navarro], pp 519-527

Page 2: J.C. Celaro, Rosa L. Finamor, C. Brandao and R. Ghidini

A dearth of informat10n on gas penetration and d1ffusion rateshas restricted the use of fumigation with phosphine by more effectiveand cheaper means.

Some storage companies in their pur sua.t;of better aLt.ernat.i.vefumigation procedures have used the aeration system to distribute thegas throughout the grain bulk or to introduce the tablets into thesystem. Not only does this practice result in partial loss ofphosphine gas expelled to the outside air, but it is highly dangerousdue to subsequent separation of phosphine from its protector gases(carbon dioxide and ammonia), (Greening, 1981), ingredients thatprevent flammability of phosphine at high concentrations.

In some countries the aeration system is used as an aid tofumigation. In this case however, aeration is by closed recirculat10nto facilitate gas distribution, or is used to expel the fumigant fromthe bulk at the end of the fumigation period.

According to usual practice (instruction methods by German andlocal manufacturers), the pellets should be added to the grain duringbulk transfer operations. In France, Buquet et al., (1978), recommendthe use of automatic distributors for application to grain flow, whilefor static fumigations they recommend that the maximum height of thegrain bulk. be between 5 and 8 m to enable the probe to reach withinone to two metres from the bin floor. In Australia, usual procedure isalso by admixture during loading though it is known that in NewcastleCSIRO technicians obtained good penetration with surface applicationin airtight steel structures. In Germany, Degesch, the manufacturer ofPhostoxin tablets recommends the tablets be incorporated arrt.othecommodity during loading, or through probes for static fumigation. Ifgrain height does not exceed 3 m and air-tightness of the structure isgoad. tablets may be distributed over the surface of the commodity.

Thus three meters would appear to be the maximum distance ofpenetration through grain. Since most silos and granaries are from 10to 35 m high, phosphine fumigation has trad1tionally been by graintransfer, while for flat storage, fumigation is by probes.

To determine the depth of effective action and speed of diffusionof phosphine (Gastoxin) through wheat and corn, experiments wereinitiated in the storehouse unit at Garibaldi (RS), owned by theCoIIIlpanhiaEstadual de Silos e Armazens-CESA, Brazil. This silo is~ of five concrete bins with a total capacity of 25 000 tons.

S20

Page 3: J.C. Celaro, Rosa L. Finamor, C. Brandao and R. Ghidini

Mater1als and Methods

The trials were carried out in bins with 16 cm thick walls, 15 md1ameter, 35.5 m h1gh (not 1nclud1ng cone), and a capacity of about5000 tons.

The first tr1al was undertaken in July 1984 in bin No.1 on 4 800tons of corn at 13.2% moisture content (ms c,) and at 280C, heavilyinfested w1th Sitophilus oryzae (L.) and Tribol1um castaneum(Herbst). The second trial took place in bin No.2 containing 4 800tons wheat at 13% m.c. and at 290C, also infested with ~ oryzae, andT. castaneum.

Seven holes, 1.25 cm diameter were drilled in the bin wallsvertically from top to bottom (points 1-7, F1g.1). speci al probesconsisting of three 1 m units and enclosing 10 adults of S1tophilusand 10 adults of Tribol1um were inserted 1nto each hole. Theseadd1tional artif1cial infestations served to evaluate fumigationefficiency at d1fferent heights during the 30 days of fum1gation.

Filter paper Lmbi.bedwith 10% si Lve r nitrate and placed a.nsi.dethe tubes were used with a Drager unit to detect the presence ofphosphine for evaluation of speed of penetrat~on of the gas. In bothtrials phosphine was app.li ed using 0.6 g pellets (0.2 g a s i., perpellet) at 5 pellets per ton. The pellets were placed 1n trays on thegrain surface.

The headspace in bin No.1containing wheat), was about 360concentrat10n(13 mg/liter) in theto allow for a 50% safety marg1n27 mg/liter, (1.79% by volume).

~ontain~ng corn (less than thatm • The maximum possible phosphaneheadspace was calculated beforehandbelow the lower explosion point of

Results and discussion

Complete mortality of both species of test insect was recorded inthe wheat bin at points 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 (up to 27 m depth) during 8days of exposure. At points 6 and 7 gas concentrat1ons were notdetected even after 8 days when 'probes were removed, but replacementwith new test insects and exposure at these points for a further 3days resulted in 100% kill (Table 1).

For the corn fumigation complete mortality was recorded at allsampling po1nts after 3 days exposure.

The wheat b1n was kept sealed for 19.6 days (471 h) and the cornbin for 35.8 days (842 h). These prolonged exposure periods enabledthe fumigant to affect developing stages of the insects.

521

Page 4: J.C. Celaro, Rosa L. Finamor, C. Brandao and R. Ghidini

Table 1: Percentage ki.Ll,of §.. oryzae and 1:. castaneum adults byphosphine fumigation ~n probes placed at different depths in

wheat and corn bins.

Wheat bin Corn bin

Probe After 8 days Reinfestation After 3 dayspoint Exposure and after 3 days ExposureNo. further exposure

1 100 1002 100 1003 100 1004 100 1005 100 1006 a 100 1007 a 100 100

During unloading (December 1984 - January 1985), grain samplestaken from the two grain bulks were examined for survival of bothammatiuze and adult insects. Only one La.ve psocid was recorded fromthese samples.

Despite the difficulty in controlling immature stages ofSitophilus by phosphine fumigation (Reynolds et. al., 1967), themortalities obtained in these trials demonstrate the efficacy of thepresent procedure. In bin No.1 containing corn, gas diffusion wasrapid due to the relatively large intergranular air-space. Within 17.1h phosphine was recorded at point 7 (34.7 m) , From the time the gaswas detected at point 1 (4 m) 5 h after fumigant release, only 30minutes elapsed before the gas was detected at point 4 at a depth of20.5 m (Table 2). In analysis of gas penetration rate it should benoted that phosphine release starts two to three hours after exposureof the pellets to the air, and highest concentrations are reachedafter about 15 h.

In bin 2 containing wheat, gas diffusion was considerably slowerthan in the previous case. Point 7 at the bottom of the bin wasreached in 166 h, a period 10 times longer than that required for thecorn bin. Point 1 at 5 m was reached 14 h after fumigant application.Times for fumigant penetration between intermediate points were rathervariable, minimum time being 6 h and maximum 49.3 h. Differences ingas penetration were probably due to accumulation of dockage incertain regions that hindered penetration and may have increasedsorption of the gas thereby decreasing its concentration. According toMonro (1970), sorption is inversely correlated with temperature.However it is also true that diffusion is more rapid at hightemperatures than at low ones.

522

Page 5: J.C. Celaro, Rosa L. Finamor, C. Brandao and R. Ghidini

Table 2: Time in hours for phosphine diffusion betweenconsecutive sampling points in the fumigated corn andwheat bins

Point No.surface 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Corni)i';tance (m) 4 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 4.5Time (hours) 5 0.16 0.16 o. 3 7 1.40

~Distance (m) 5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 1Time (hours) 14 25 6 32.3 49.3 6 33.3

The convection currents activated by temperature d1fferences inthe grain bulk are also partially responsible for upward and downwardmovement of phosphine through the grain bulk. The alternatingappearance and disappearance of phosphine was recorded both during thedownwards phase of gas penetration, and also after the maximum depthwas reached. These fluctuations were less frequent for the wheat bulk,possibly due to its lower coefficient of porosity.

Cost analysis of a conventional fumigation involving graintransfer in comparison with a static fumigation is given in Table 3.

Table 3: Cost analysis of grain transfer operation (June 1984).

SERVICE COSTS/HOURElectrical consumptionMaintenance

Cr$4 806564 5 370

STAFF COSTS/HOURWages and social benefitsBin administration

3 5254 350 7 875

ESTIMATED COSTS/HOUREquipment depreciation 2 166 2 166

SUBTOTALCENTRAL ADM. COST (30\)'!'OTAL/HOURTOTAL FOR 50 HOUR FUMIGATION

14 4114 62320 034

1 001 700

523

Page 6: J.C. Celaro, Rosa L. Finamor, C. Brandao and R. Ghidini

Inclusive hourly costs of energy, maintenance, depreciation, staffand administration expenses, and cost/hour of grain turning at theGaribaldi silos was Cr$ 20 034 (US$ 11.59). Thus for a 50 h fumigationtime required for a complete transfer of grain from one bin to another(at a nominal transfer rate of 100 tons/hour) the total cost(exclusive of fumigant material) was Cr$ 1 001 700 (US$579). Thisestimate does not include the fact that fumigation by grain transferrequires one bin of the silo to remain empty in order to rece1ve theproduct. Since the Garibaldi silos consists of five 5 000 ton binsthis means one fifth of the capacity, or 5 000 tons of storagecapacity must remain empty for phosphine fumigation by the traditionalmethod to be applicable.

Conclusions

Static fumigation with phosphine WdS carried out in air-tight,well sealed concrete silos 35.5 m high with the following results:

Complete mortality was obta1ned for all stages of ~ oryzae andT. castaneum at a dose of 1 g phosphine a.i. per ton at the surface ofa 4 800 ton corn bulk and wheat bulk.

There was a considerable difference in the time required forfumigant to penetrate to the bottom of the wheat and corn bins. Thegas took 17.1 h to penetrate the corn column, and 166 h to penetratethe wheat column. The porosity of the commodity appears to be one ofthe major factors determ1ning the rate of fumigant diffusion.

A cost reduction of Cr$ 1 001 700 (US$ 579) per unit fumigationwas calculated for the Garibaldi silos, when the phosphine is appliedby static fumigation.

References

Buquet, R. et., al., (1978) Moyens de lutte. In: Les insectes etacariens des cereales stockees. Institut Techniques des Cerealeset des Fourraqes. S.I., AFNDR 3, 113-175.

Greening, H.G. (1981) Expurgo com fosfina nos gazos armazenados.Simposio sobre combate a pragas de Gahos Armazenados, PortoAlegre, Casa Bernardo.

Monro, H.A.U. (1970) La fumigation en tant que traitment insecticide.FAD Rome, (Etudes Agricoles de la FAD, 79. 398pp.

Reynolds, E.M. Robinson, J.M. and Howells, C. (1967) The effect onSitophilus qranarius (L.) of exposure to low concentrations ofphosphine. J. stored Prod. Res. 2: 111-186.

524

Page 7: J.C. Celaro, Rosa L. Finamor, C. Brandao and R. Ghidini

'IGUR I N· I

IINS DETAILS AND PHOSPHINE DIFfUSION

SPEED IN CORN AND WHEAT

BIN I

CORN81N 2

WHEAT

IIIACHI... TtMI t _II ellAIN IUUACt

••.....ll: .....

525

Page 8: J.C. Celaro, Rosa L. Finamor, C. Brandao and R. Ghidini

Fig. 2 PHOSPHINE MOVEMENT INSIDE ~ CORN BIN

I _

2 ----_____ ------e 3 ------------------ ---- ---------• 4 ~- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -f 5 ~ - - _ - - - - - - - -

e7

50 III al IIIII ITI 150 10.0 • .4 40.041.4 444 .. 4 .. , 111.1 ..... 11.... H.III. 1M. 1'7' 1111.

I _2 _

~ 31-__ _ _

f 4 -- - - - - - - - -!l - -- - - - -- - - - - - - _ - - - - - - _ - - - --- - - - - ----- - - - - ---e I- --- - - - - _ - - - - _ - __ - _ - _ - _ - - - - --- - - - -- - -7 _- _

------------ - - ---

.11 I .74. .el 0 .-01 '14.1 _. 111.1 1Ie.l IU' 118.0 141.0 IlIl,O III 0 •• 0 1710 _ 0 1.. .0 1M 0 I" 0I _

2 _

3 ~ - - _ - - - - - - -----

I! 4~-------------------- _i !l

e7

101.0 !lOO ... .0 1110 IILO IllS 0 ... .0 44.0 4111.0411.0 .. 70 4700 411 0 4170 4170 IlOO.0 10'0 1.. .0

I

23

l! 4

i 5e7

---------- - - ---~- -- --------- - - --- - - - - - - - ---- - - ------ - - - - - - ---------

0',0 lII70 lI'IO 1117.0 144.0 sse.o lI.. .o 171.0 lIM.o '11,0 '11,0 ... .0 .lIIO ... 0 70.0 701,0 7140 TlO.

I2 .... _3 _

i:e7 _

------------- - - ----

74e.o 711"0 ?II 0 71.. 0 711.0 eOQO _ 0 .01 0 110.0 8140 141.0

nNE AFnlfEll~.fTION 01' _~""'I hI

526

Page 9: J.C. Celaro, Rosa L. Finamor, C. Brandao and R. Ghidini

t2

I! 5• 4o..S87

I2

• 5r:87

I2

i54S87

I

25

~ 4•f s87

Fig. 3PHOSPHINe MOVEMENT UlI..lRI IHI WHEAT Ill!

- - - - - ------------------------ - -- -- ------- ------- -------- - - - - - -- - --- ---- - -------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - ------

14 II U •• .1 U H " 4. 45 .. 15 57 II 15 11 71 77. IS .. II 17 101 .05 101 III II ...1 II' til

--------------- - - - - - - - - ------------------- -- -- - - - - - - -- - - -- - --- -------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - ------------ ---------------------------- - - - - - - - --- - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - ----

.17 14. 141114. 1111tll7 18' '" .70 174 .71 III .11 III •• 100 .05 10•• ,7 "' 115 U' .11 .17 .41 .411 .4 •• 1111117

------- - - - ------- ---------- - -- -------------~-- -------------------- -- -- - ------- - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - ------- - - - - - - -- - - ---- - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ - - - -- - - - ---------------- -- - -- -- --- - ------------- ---- ------ - -- --- -------------

II' III _ ITI 177 .. _ III 117 lOt 101 101"I 117 1., 01 III 1111 11111.1 117 171 I" 17. I"

----------- - -- - --------- - - - - --

------- ---- ---- -- --- -- ----------- -- - - - - ---- - - - -- - - - - - -- - - ------- - -----

---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------

117 "' III'" 401 407 4" 4.. 4.. "I 417 4.. 4" 40 441 447 451 411 49 "I .. 7 47.

f •• Al'Tl:R EJl~S'flOtl OF "_"HIIII hI

'27