Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

50
Security architecture of the Java platform Martin Toshev @martin_fmi

Transcript of Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Page 1: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Security architecture of the Java platform

Martin Toshev

@martin_fmi

Page 2: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Who am I

Software consultant (CoffeeCupConsulting)

BG JUG board member (http://jug.bg)

OpenJDK and Oracle RBDMS enthusiast

Twitter: @martin_fmi

Page 3: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev
Page 4: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Agenda

• Evolution of the Java security model

• Outside the sandbox: APIs for secure coding

• Designing and coding with security in mind

Page 5: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

Page 6: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• Traditionally - companies protect they assets using strict physical and network access policies

• Tools such as anti-virus software, firewalls, IPS/IDS systems facilitate this approach

Page 7: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• With the introduction of various technologies for loading and executing code on the client machine from the browser (such as Applets) - a new range of concerns emerge related to client security – this is when the Java security sandbox starts to evolve …

Page 8: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• The goal of the Java security sandbox is to allow untrusted code from applets to be executed in a trusted environment such as the user's browser

Page 9: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• JDK 1.0 (when it all started …) – the original sandbox model was introduced

Applet(untrusted)

System code(trusted)

JVM

Browser

http://javantura.com/demoapplet

Page 10: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• Code executed by the JVM is divided in two domains – trusted and untrusted

• Strict restriction are applied by default on the security model of applets such as denial to read/write data from disk, connect to the network and so on

Page 11: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• JDK 1.1 (gaining trust …) – applet signing introduced

Applet(untrusted)

System code(trusted)

JVM

Browser

Signed Applet(trusted)

http://javantura.com/demoapplet

http://javantura.com/trustedapplet

Page 12: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• Local code (as in JDK 1.0) and signed applet code (as of JDK 1.1) are trusted

• Unsigned remote code (as in JDK 1.0) is not trusted

Page 13: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• Steps needed to sign and run an applet:• Compile the applet

• Create a JAR file for the applet

• Generate a pair of public/private keys

• Sign the applet JAR with the private key

• Export a certificate for the public key

• Import the Certificate as a Trusted Certificate

• Create the policy file

• Load and run the applet

Page 14: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• JDK 1.2 (gaining more trust …) – fine-grained access control

Applet

System code

JVM

Browser

grant codeBase http://javantura.com/demoapplet {permission java.io.FilePermisions “C:\\Windows” “delete”

}

security.policy

SecurityManager.checkPermission(…)AccessController.checkPermission(…)

http://javantura.com/demoapplet

Page 15: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• The security model becomes code-centric

• Additional access control decisions are specified in a security policy

• No more notion of trusted and untrusted code

Page 16: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• The notion of protection domain introduced – determined by the security policy

• Two types of protection domains – system and application

Page 17: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• The protection domain is set during classloading and contains the code source and the list of permissions for the class

applet.getClass().getProtectionDomain();

Page 18: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• One permission can imply another permission

java.io.FilePermissions “C:\\Windows” “delete”

implies

java.io.FilePermissions “C:\\Windows\\system32” “delete”

Page 19: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• One code source can imply another code sourcecodeBase http://javantura.com/

implies

codeBase http://javantura.com/demoapplet

Page 20: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• Since an execution thread may pass through classes loaded by different classloaders (and hence – have different protection domains) the following rule of thumb applies:

The permission set of an execution thread is considered to be the intersection of the permissions of all protection domains traversed by the execution thread

Page 21: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• JDK 1.3, 1,4 (what about entities running the code … ?) – JAAS

Applet

System code

JVM

Browser

http://javantura.com/demoapplet

grant principal javax.security.auth.x500.X500Principal "cn=Tom"

{ permission java.io.FilePermissions “C:\\Windows” “delete” }

security.policy

Page 22: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• JAAS (Java Authentication and Authorization Service) extends the security model with role-based permissions

• The protection domain of a class now may contain not only the code source and the permissions but a list of principals

Page 23: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• The authentication component of JAAS is independent of the security sandbox in Java and hence is typically used in more wider context (such as JavaEE application servers)

• The authorization component is the one that extends the Java security policy

Page 24: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• Core classes of JAAS:

• javax.security.auth.Subject - an authenticated subject

• java.security.Principal - identifying characteristic of a subject

• javax.security.auth.spi.LoginModule - interface for implementors of login (PAM) modules

• javax.security.auth.login.LoginContext - creates objects used for authentication

Page 25: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• Up to JDK 1.4 the following is a typical flow for permission checking:

1) upon system startup a security policy is set and a security manager is installed

Policy.setPolicy(…)

System.setSecurityManager(…)

Page 26: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• Up to JDK 1.4 the following is a typical flow for permission checking:

2) during classloading (e.g. of a remote applet) bytecode verification is done and the protection domain is set for the current classloader (along with the code source, the set of permissions and the set of JAAS principals)

Page 27: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• Up to JDK 1.4 the following is a typical flow for permission checking:

3) when system code is invoked from the remote code the SecurityManageris used to check against the intersection of protection domains based on the chain of threads and their call stacks

Page 28: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• Up to JDK 1.4 the following is a typical flow for permission checking:

SocketPermission permission = new

SocketPermission(“javantura.com:8000-9000","connect,accept");

SecurityManager sm = System.getSecurityManager();

if (sm != null) sm.checkPermission(permission);

Page 29: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• Up to JDK 1.4 the following is a typical flow for permission checking:

4) application code can also do permission checking against remote code using a SecurityManager or an AccessController

Page 30: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• Up to JDK 1.4 the following is a typical flow for permission checking:

SocketPermission permission = new

SocketPermission(“javantura.com:8000-9000", "connect,accept");

AccessController.checkPermission(permission)

Page 31: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• Up to JDK 1.4 the following is a typical flow for permission checking:

5) application code can also do permission checking with all permissions of the calling domain or a particular JAAS subject

AccessController.doPrivileged(…)

Subject.doAs(…)

Subject.doAsPrivileged(…)

Page 32: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• The security model defined by java.lang.SecurityManager is customizable

• For example: Oracle JVM uses a custom SecurityManager with additional permission classes where the code source is a database schema (containing e.g. Java stored procedures)

Page 33: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• JDK 1.5, 1.6 (enhancing the model …) – new additions to the sandbox model (e.g. LDAP support for JAAS)

Page 34: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• JDK 1.7, 1.8 (further enhancing the model …) – enhancements to the sandbox model (e.g. AccessController.doPrivileged() for checking against a subset of permissions)

Page 35: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• JDK 1.9 and beyond … (applying the model to modules …)

application module

system module 1

JVM

Browser

http://javantura.com/appmodule

security.policy

system module 2

Page 36: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• By modules we understand modules in JDK as defined by project Jigsaw

• Modules must conform to the same security model as applets –each module is loaded by a particular classloader (bootstrap, extension or system)

Page 37: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Evolution of the Java security model

• Modularization of the JDK system classes allows further to define fine-grained access control permissions for classes in the system domain

• This is not currently allowed due to the monolithic nature of the JDK

Page 38: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Outside the sandbox:APIs for secure coding

Page 39: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Outside the sandbox:APIs for secure coding

• The security sandbox defines a strict model for execution of remote code in the JVM

• The other side of the coin are the security APIs that provide utilities for implementing the different aspects of application security …

Page 40: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Outside the sandbox:APIs for secure coding

• The additional set of APIs includes:• JCA (Java Cryptography Architecture)

• PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) utilities

• JSSE (Java Secure Socket Extension)

• Java GSS API (Java Generic Security Services)

• Java SASL API (Java Simple Authentication and Security Layer)

Page 41: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Designing and coding with security in mind

Page 42: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Designing and coding with security in mind

• First of all - follow programing guidelines and best practices -most are not bound to the Java programming language (input validation, error handling, type safety, access modifiers, resource cleanup, prepared SQL queries and whatever you can think of …)

Page 43: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Designing and coding with security in mind

• Respect the SecurityManager - design libraries so that they work in environments with installed SecurityManager

• Example: GSON library does not respect the SecurityManager and cannot be used without additional reflective permissions in some scenarios

Page 44: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Designing and coding with security in mind

• Grant minimal permissions to code that requires them - the principle of "least privilege"

• Copy-pasting, of course, increases the risk of security flows (if the copied code is flawed)

Page 45: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Designing and coding with security in mind

• Sanitize exception messages from sensitive information - often this results in an unintended exposal of exploitable information

• Let alone exception stacktraces … in many cases they convey a wealth of information about the system

Page 46: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

Thank you

Page 47: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

References

• Java Security Overview (white paper)

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/js-white-paper-149932.pdf

• Java SE Platform Security Architecture Spec

http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/security/spec/security-spec.doc.html

• Inside Java 2 Platform Security, 2nd edition

http://www.amazon.com/Inside-Java%C2%BF-Platform-Security-Implementation/dp/0201787911

Page 48: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

References

• Java Security, 2nd edition, Scott Oaks

http://shop.oreilly.com/product/9780596001575.do

• Securing Java, Gary McGraw, Ed Felden

http://www.securingjava.com

• Secure Coding Guidelines for Java SE

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/seccodeguide-139067.html#0

Page 49: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

References

• Java 2 Network Security

http://www.amazon.com/JAVA-Network-Security-2nd-Edition/dp/0130155926

• Java Security Documentation

http://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/security/index.html

Page 50: Javantura v4 - Security architecture of the Java platform - Martin Toshev

References

• Core Java Security: Class Loaders, Security Managers and Encryption

http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1187967

• Overview of Java Security Models

http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E12839_01/core.1111/e10043/introjps.htm#CHDCEJGH