James Elliott, et al. v. ESB Financial, Inc., et al. 14-CV-01689...
Transcript of James Elliott, et al. v. ESB Financial, Inc., et al. 14-CV-01689...
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 24
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JAMES ELLIOTT, on behalf of himself
Case No.: 2:14-cv-01689-MRH and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
V.
ESB FINANCIAL, INC., HERBERT S. SKUBA, CHARLOTTE A. ZUSCHLAG, JAMES P. WETZEL, JR., MARIO J. MANNA, WILLIAM B. SALSGIVER AND WESBANCO, INC.,
Defendants.
STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
This Stipulation of Settlement (the "Stipulation" or "Settlement"), dated April 28, 2015,
which is entered into between: (i) Plaintiff James Elliott ("Elliott"), plaintiff in the above-
captioned action Elliott v. ESB Financial, Inc., et al., Case No.: 2:14-ev-01689-MRH (the
"Federal Court Action"), pending before the United States District Court for the Western District
of Pennsylvania (the "Court"); (ii) Plaintiff Randall Kress ("Kress" and together with Elliott,
"Plaintiffs"), plaintiff in Kress v. ESB Financial, Inc., et al,, Case No.: 111 85/14CA (the "State
Court Action" and together with the Federal Court Action, the "Actions"), pending before the
Court of Common Pleas for.Lawrence County (the "State Court"); and (iii) defendants Herbert S.
Skuba, Charlotte A. Zusehiag, James P. Wetzel, Jr., Mario J. Manna, and William B. Saisgiver
(the "ESB Director Defendants"), ESB Bank and ESB Financial, Inc. (also named as ESB
Financial Corporation) (collectively "ESB"), and WesBanco, Inc. and Wesbanco Bank, Inc.
(collectively "WesBanco") (the ESB Director Defendants, ESB, and WesBanco are collectively
(B19570341)
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 2 of 24
referred to as the "Defendants") (all persons and entities identified above in subsections (i)-(iii)
are collectively referred to herein as the "Parties"), all by and through their undersigned
attorneys, states all of the terms of the settlement and resolution of the Actions and is intended by
the Parties to fully and finally compromise, resolve, discharge, and settle the Released Claims (as
defined below), subject to the approval of the Court in the Federal Court Action.
Background of the Settlement
A. On October 29, 2014, ESB announced that it had entered into an Agreement and
Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with WesBanco to combine in a transaction in which
each share of ESB common stock will be converted into the right to receive cash in the amount
of $1.76 per share and 0.502 shares of WesBanco Common Stock (the "Merger Transaction").
B. In letters dated November 17, 2014 and November 24, 2014 (the "Demand
Letters"), Plaintiffs made demands upon the ESB Board of Directors, (i) describing the factual
basis for their allegations of wrongdoing by officers and directors of ESB and how such
wrongdoing is harmful to ESB and its shareholders, and (ii) requesting that the ESB Board take
remedial action, including without limitation, insuring that the Merger Transaction consideration
is fair to ESB and its shareholders.
C. On December 3, 2014, Babst, Calland, Clements & Zonmir, P.C. ("Babst
Calland"), sent a letter to counsel for Plaintiff Kress on behalf of ESB, stating that the ESB
Board of Directors would be reviewing and responding to the Demand Letters.
D. On December 11, 2014, Babst Calland, after investigation and consultation with
ESB's Director Defendants, sent a letter to counsel for Plaintiff Elliott rejecting Elliott's
demands.
(B1957O341 2
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 3 of 24
E. On November 21, 2014, Plaintiff Kress filed a Verified Shareholder Derivative
and Class Action Complaint in the State Court, alleging direct and derivative claims that the ESB
Director Defendants had breached and were breaching their fiduciary duties to ESB shareholders
in connection with the Merger Transaction, and that ESB and WesBanco aided and abetted those
breaches of fiduciary duties,
F. On November 21, 2014, WesBanco filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission ("SEC") the Form S-4 (the "Registration Statement"), which contained a
preliminary joint proxy statement/prospectus. The Registration Statement was declared effective
on December 11, 2014 and a final prospectus was filed by WesBanco on that same date.
G. On or about December 15, 2014, ESB commenced mailing of the definitive joint
proxy statement/prospectus ("Joint Proxy Statement") to shareholders of ESB informing its
shareholders that they would be entitled to vote on the Merger Transaction at a special meeting
of ESB shareholders scheduled for January 22, 2015 (the "ESB Shareholders' Meeting")
H. On or about December 15, 2014, WesBanco commenced mailing of the Joint
Proxy Statement to shareholders of WesBanco informing those shareholders that they would be
entitled to vote on the issuance of shares of WesBanco common stock in connection with the
Merger Transaction at a special meeting of WesBanco shareholders scheduled for January 22,
2015 (the "WesBanco Shareholders' Meeting").
I. On December 15, 2014, Plaintiff Elliott filed a Class Action Complaint in the
Court, alleging that the ESB Director Defendants had breached and were breaching their
fiduciary duties to ESB's shareholders, that WesBanco had aided and abetted those breaches of
fiduciary duties, and that the Registration Statement failed to disclose certain material facts and
information in alleged violation of Rule 14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.
B195703411 3
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 4 of 24
J. Plaintiff Elliott and Defendants entered into a Stipulated Confidentiality
Agreement on or about December 23, 2014, which was entered as a Protective Order in the
Federal Court Action on December 23, 2014 (the "Protective Order")
K. Pursuant to the terms of the Protective Order and in response to requests for
expedited discovery submitted to Defendants on December 22, 2014, ESB and the ESB Director
Defendants produced over 3,800 pages of non-public documents to Plaintiffs and their counsel.
L. On January 9, 2015, Plaintiff Elliott, with the consent of Defendants, took the
depositions of ESB Director Defendant and Chief Executive Officer, Charlotte Zuschlag, and
Mufson Howe Hunter Managing Director, Edward Losty, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
M. Shortly after the depositions were concluded, Plaintiffs' counsel and counsel for
ESB and WesBanco engaged in arm's-length settlement discussions with a view toward
resolving the Shareholder Actions by making supplemental disclosures (the "Supplemental
Disclosures") regarding the Merger Transaction.
N. On January 15, 2015, the Parties, through their respective counsel, reached an
agreement on the structure of a settlement (the "Settlement") and entered into a Memorandum of
Settlement (the "MOS") outlining the basic terms of the Settlement and attaching the
Supplemental Disclosures regarding the Merger Transaction.
0. On January 15, 2015, ESB included the Supplemental Disclosures in a current
report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC;
P. On January 22, 2015, the ESB shareholders approved the Merger Transaction at
the ESB Shareholders' Meeting.
1319570341) 4
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 5 of 24
Q. On January 22, 2015, the WesBanco shareholders approved the issuance of the
shares of WesBanco common stock necessary to complete the Merger Transaction at the
WesBanco Shareholders' Meeting.
R. On February 10, 2015, Wesbanco completed its merger with ESB.
S. Defendants acknowledge that the pendency and prosecution of the Actions and
the negotiations between the Parties' counsel, caused the decision to make the Supplemental
Disclosures.
T. Plaintiffs believe that their claims have substantial merit and were brought in
good faith, are settling in order to provide a benefit to the ESB shareholders through the
Supplemental Disclosures so as to allow for a fully informed shareholder vote on the Merger
Transaction and to avoid the uncertainty of continued litigation, particularly in view of the
limited time available before the scheduled consummation of the Merger Transaction, which
closed on February 10, 2015.
U. All the Defendants have denied, and continue to deny, that they have committed,
or aided and abetted in the commission of, any violation of law or duty or engaged in any
wrongful acts whatsoever; deny that any Supplemental Disclosures are required under any
applicable state or federal law, statute, rule, or regulation; expressly maintain that they diligently
and scrupulously complied with all applicable fiduciary, disclosure, and all other legal duties,
and are settling the Shareholder Actions solely to avoid the expense, burden and uncertainty of
continued litigation.
V. In negotiating and evaluating the terms of this Stipulation, Plaintiffs' counsel
considered the significant legal and factual defenses to Plaintiffs' claims that Defendants raised
and might have raised throughout the pendency of the Shareholder Actions, and the entry by
{B19570341} 5
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 6 of 24
Plaintiffs into this Stipulation is not an admission as to the hack of merit of any claims asserted in
the Shareholder Actions. In addition, Plaintiffs considered the benefits provided to the Class
members through the provision of the Supplemental Disclosures, and have agreed to the
Settlement because they believe the Supplemental Disclosures provided substantial benefits to
the ESB shareholders. Based upon their evaluation, Plaintiffs' counsel has determined that the
Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and in the best interests of Plaintiffs and all Class
members.
W. Defendants have concluded that it is desirable that the claims against them be
settled on the terms reflected in this Stipulation in order to avoid the costs, disruption, risks and
distraction of further litigation and without admitting the validity of any allegations made in the
Shareholder Actions or any liability with respect thereto or that any further supplemental
disclosure is required under any applicable rule, statute, regulation or law.
X. The Parties recognize that substantial time and expense would be incurred by
engaging in further litigation, and that further litigation is inherently uncertain.
Y. The Settlement of the Shareholder Actions on the terms and conditions set forth
herein includes but is not limited to a release of all claims asserted in the Shareholder Actions
and will have the effect of releasing all claims asserted, or that could have been asserted, by any
ESB shareholder, either directly or derivatively, relating to the Merger Transaction.
Settlement Terms
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, CONSENTED TO AND
AGREED, by Plaintiffs, for themselves, and on behalf of the Class, and the Defendants that,
subject to the approval of the Court and pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a), (b), (e) & (Ii), and the
other conditions set forth herein, for good and valuable consideration set forth herein and
{B1957034.1} 6
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 7 of 24
conferred on Plaintiffs and the Class, the Shareholder Actions shall be finally and fully settled,
compromised, and dismissed with prejudice, and that the Settled Claims shall be finally and fully
compromised, settled, released, and dismissed with prejudice as to Defendants and as to the
Released Persons, in the manner and upon the terms and conditions hereafter set forth.
I. Definitions
(a) In addition to the terms already defined above, the following
capitalized terms, used in this Stipulation of Settlement, shall have the meanings specified
below:
(1) "Class" means a conditionally certified non-opt out class,
pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a) & (b)(l), (2) & (3), that includes any and all persons or entities
who held ESB common shares at any time between October 29, 2014 and February 10, 2015,
either of record or beneficially, including any and all of their respective successors-in-interest,
predecessors, representatives, trustees, executors, administrators, heirs, assigns, or transferees,
whether immediate and remote, and any person or entity acting for or on behalf of, or claiming
under any of them, and specifically including Plaintiffs, but excluding Defendants, their
subsidiary companies, affiliates, assigns, and members of their immediate families, as the case
maybe.
(2) "Class Counsel" or "Plaintiffs Counsel" means the law
firms of Brodsky & Smith, LLC and the Law Office of Alfred G. Yates, Jr., PC.
(3) "Class Member" means a member of the Class.
(4) "Court Approval" means entry of the Judgment (as defined
below).
(B1957034.1) 7
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 8 of 24
(5) "Effective Date" means the first business day following the
date the Judgment becomes final and unappealable, whether by affirmance on appeal or
exhaustion of any possible appeal or review, lapse of time or otherwise. The finality of the
Judgment shall not be affected by any appeal or other proceeding solely regarding an application
for attorneys' fees and expenses.
(6) "Judgment" means the Order and Final Judgment to be
entered in the Federal Court Action substantially in the form attached as Exhibit A hereto.
(7) "Released Persons" means, whether or not any or all of the
following persons or entities were named, served with process, or appeared in the Shareholder
Actions, Defendants and any of their respective families, parent entities, controlling persons,
associates, predecessors, successors, affiliates or subsidiaries, and each and all of their respective
past or present officers, directors, shareholders, stockholders, principals, representatives,
employees, attorneys, financial or investment advisors, consultants, accountants, investment
bankers, commercial bankers, entities providing fairness opinions, underwriters, brokers, dealers,
advisors or agents, insurers, heirs, executors, trustees, general or limited partners or partnerships,
limited liability companies, members, managers, joint ventures, personal or legal representatives,
estates, administrators, predecessors, successors and assigns, and any alleged or potential aiders
or abettors,
(8) "Releasing Persons" means Plaintiffs or any member of the
Class, whether individual, direct, class, derivative, representative, legal, equitable, or any other
type or in any other capacity.
(9) "Settled Claims" means any and all manner of claims
(known claims and "Unknown Claims" (defined below), demands, rights, causes of action,
(B19570341 8
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 9 of 24
liabilities, damages, losses, obligations, judgments, duties, suits, costs, expenses, matters and
issues known or unknown, contingent or absolute, suspected or unsuspected, disclosed or
undisclosed, liquidated or unliquidated, compensatory or punitive, matured or unmatured,
accrued or unacerued, apparent or unapparent, that have been, could have been, or in the future
can or might be asserted in any court, tribunal or proceeding (including but not limited to any
claims arising under federal, state, foreign or common law, including the federal securities laws
and any state disclosure law), by or on behalf of Plaintiffs or any member of the Class, whether
direct, derivative, individual, class, representative, legal, equitable, or of any other type, or in any
other capacity, against any of the Released Persons, which have arisen, could have arisen, arise
now or hereafter may arise out of, or relate in any manner to, the acts, events, facts, matters,
transactions, occurrences, statements, representations, misrepresentations or omissions or any
other matter whatsoever set forth in or otherwise related, directly or indirectly, to (i) the
allegations that were asserted in the Shareholder Actions, (ii) the Merger Transaction or any
deliberations or negotiations in connection therewith, (iii) the consideration to be provided in the
Merger Transaction, (iv) the Merger Agreement (and the transactions and governance
arrangements and employment arrangements contemplated therein or in connection therewith),
(v) any fiduciary or related alleged wrongful acts or obligations of the Released Persons in
connection with the Merger Transaction or any alternatives thereto, (vi) other than as provided in
this Stipulation, the fees, expenses, or costs incurred in prosecuting, defending, or settling the
Shareholder Actions, or (vii) any disclosures or alleged omissions made in connection with the
Merger Transaction, including any disclosures in or claimed omissions from the Registration
Statement or the Definitive Proxy Statement (and/or any supplements, amendments or revisions
(B957O34.fl 9
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 10 of 24
thereto); provided, however, that the Settled Claims shall not include any claims to enforce the
Settlement.
(10) "Settlement" means the settlement of the Shareholder
Actions between and among Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and the Class, as well as
derivatively on behalf of ESB, and the Defendants, as set forth in this Stipulation.
(11) "Settlement Hearing" means the hearings(s) to be held
before the Court to determine (i) whether to certify the Class for settlement purposes,
(ii) whether to certify Plaintiff Elliott and Class Counsel as Class representatives, (iii) whether
the Settlement should be approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate, (iv) whether Judgment
approving the Settlement should be entered, (v) whether and in what amount any attorneys' fees
and expenses should be paid to Class Counsel by ESB, its successor-in-interest, or their
respective insurer(s).
(12) "Unknown Claims" means any claim that a Releasing
Person does not know or suspect exists in his, her or its favor at the time of the release of the
Settled Claims as against the Released Persons, including without limitation those that, if known,
might have affected the decision to enter into the Settlement. The Settlement is intended to
extinguish all Settled Claims and, consistent with such intentions, the Releasing Persons shall
waive their rights to the extent permitted by state law, federal law, foreign law or principle of
common law, which may have the effect of limiting the release set forth above. This shall
include a waiver by the Releasing Persons of any rights pursuant to § 1542 of the California
Civil Code (or any similar, comparable or equivalent provision) which provides:
A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE,
{B19570341) 10
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 11 of 24
WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.
The Releasing Persons acknowledge that members of the Class and/or other ESB shareholders
may discover facts in addition to or different from those that they now know or believe to be true
with respect to the subject matter of this release, but the Plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and on
behalf of the Class intend to fully, finally and forever settle and release any and all claims
whether known claims or unknown claims, suspected or unsuspected, that now exist, or
heretofore existed, or may hereafter exist, and without regard to the subsequent discovery or
existence of such additional or different facts. Plaintiffs and the other Parties hereto
acknowledge, and the members of the Class by operation of the judgment shall be deemed to
have acknowledged, that the inclusion of "Unknown Claims" in the definition of "Settled
Claims" was separately bargained for and was a key element of the Settlement and was relied
upon by each and all of the Defendants in entering into the Stipulation.
2. Conditional Certification of Class
(a) The Parties agree to the certification of the Class and the
certification of Plaintiff James Elliott as class representative ("Class Representative") for the
purposes of this Settlement only.
(b) The certification of the Class shall be binding only with respect to
this Stipulation. In the event that this Stipulation is terminated pursuant to its terms or is not
approved in all material respects by the Court, the Effective Date does not occur, the Settlement
otherwise does not become final for any reason, or the Judgment entered pursuant hereto is
reversed, vacated, or modified in any material respect by the Court or any other court, the
certification of the Class shall, except as provided in Paragraph 8(a), be deemed vacated, the
Shareholder Actions shall proceed as though the Class had never been certified, and no reference
{B1957034.1} 11
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 12 of 24
to certification of the Class, or to the Stipulation or any documents related thereto, shall be made
by the Parties for any purpose, except as expressly authorized by the terms of this Stipulation. If
any of the forgoing events occur, Defendants reserve the right to oppose certification of any
plaintiff class and assert any and all defenses and objections they may have in any future
proceedings.
3. Submission of the Settlement to the Court
As soon as practicable after this Stipulation has been executed, the Parties
shall jointly apply to the Court for entry of an Order in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B (the
"Scheduling Order"), providing for, among other things: (i) the mailing to the Class Members of
the Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action, Settlement Hearing, and Right to Appear (the
"Notice"), substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C, as soon as practicable, and (ii)
the scheduling of a Settlement Hearing to consider final approval of the Settlement. ESB (or its
successor(s) in interest) shall be responsible for providing notice of the Settlement to the Class in
a form to be negotiated with counsel for Plaintiffs and approved by the Court, and ESB (or its
successor(s) in interest) shall pay all reasonable costs and expenses incurred in providing notice
of the Settlement to the members of the Class or for any other costs of administering the
Settlement.
4. Settlement Consideration and Scope of the Settlement
(a) The Supplemental Disclosures having been agreed to and provided
in consideration for the full and final settlement and dismissal with prejudice of the Shareholder
Actions and the release of the Settled Claims, no Released Person shall have any obligation to
pay or bear any additional amounts, expenses, costs, damages, or fees to or for the benefit of
Plaintiffs, in either their individual capacity or derivatively on behalf of ESB, or any Class
B1957034.1} 12
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 13 of 24
Members in connection with the Settlement, except that ESB (or its successor or insurer) shall (i)
be responsible for providing the Notice of the Settlement to the Class Members and shall pay all
reasonable, documented costs and expenses incurred in providing the Notice of the Settlement to
the Class Members as provided in Paragraph 3 hereof, and (ii) be obligated to pay attorneys' fees
and expenses to Class Counsel upon an award, if any, of attorneys' fees and expenses by the
Court solely as provided in Paragraph 6 hereof.
(b) At the Settlement Hearing, the Parties shall jointly request that the
Judgment be entered substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, which shall provide
that:
(1) The Federal Court Action and the Settled Claims are
dismissed with prejudice, on the merits and without costs (except as provided by Paragraphs 3
and 6);
(2) Plaintiffs and all Class Members, and their respective heirs,
executors, administrators, estates, predecessors-in-interest, predecessors, successors-in-interest,
successors, and assigns, agree to release and forever discharge, and by operation of the Judgment
release and forever discharge, all Settled Claims as against the Released Persons; provided,
however, that the Settled Claims shall not include any claims to enforce this Stipulation or the
Settlement;
(3) The Released Persons shall be deemed to be released and
forever discharged from all of the Settled Claims;
(4) Plaintiffs and all Class Members, and their respective heirs,
executors, administrators, estates, predecessors-in-interest, predecessors, successors-in-interest,
successors, and assigns, are forever barred and enjoined from commencing, instituting, or
{B1957034.1} 13
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 14 of 24
prosecuting any Settled Claims against any of the Released Persons in any forum whatsoever;
provided, however, that the Settled Claims shall not include any claims to enforce this
Stipulation or the Settlement; and
(5) Defendants and the Released Persons agree to release and
forever discharge, and by operation of the Judgment forever release and discharge, Plaintiffs,
each Class Member, Class Counsel, and counsel for Plaintiff Kress from all claims arising out of,
relating to, or in connection with, the institution, prosecution, assertion, settlement, or resolution
of the Shareholder Actions and Settled Claims (including Unknown Claims).
5, Conditions of Settlement
This Stipulation shall be subject to the following conditions and, except as
provided in Paragraph 8(a), shall be cancelled and terminated unless:
(a) The Court approves the certification of a settlement class and the
dissemination of a Notice of Settlement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C;
(b) The Court enters the Judgment substantially in the form attached
hereto as Exhibit A;
(c) The Merger Transaction has been consummated;
(d) The Effective Date shall have occurred; and
(e) The State Court Action is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice.
6. Attorneys' Fees and Expenses
Class Counsel intend to petition the Court for an award of fees and
expenses in connection with the prosecution and benefits obtained in the Actions (the "Fee
Application"). Defendants acknowledge that Class Counsel is entitled to seek a reasonable
award on their Fee Application, subject to the Court's approval, but reserve all rights to contest
(B1957034.I) 14
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 15 of 24
and oppose the Fee Application. The Fee Application shall be Class Counsel's sole application
for an award of fees or expenses in connection with any litigation concerning the Merger
Transaction. Final resolution by the Court of the Fee Application shall not be a precondition to
the settlement of the Shareholder Actions or the entry of final judgment herein. Upon entry of an
order regarding the Fee Application, ESB or its successor or insurer shall pay fees and expenses
in the amount awarded as described above and in the manner directed by the Court. Any amount
awarded by the Court shall be paid to Class Counsel by ESB or its successor or insurer within
twenty (20) days of the entry of the Federal Court's Order awarding such fees, and which
obligation shall be subject to the joint and several obligation of Plaintiffs' counsel to refund,
within twenty (20) days, all amounts received, if and when, as a result of any appeal and/or
further proceeding on remand, or successful collateral attack, the award of fees, costs, and
expenses is reduced or reversed or if the award order does not become final, if the Settlement
itself is voided by any Party as provided herein, or if the Settlement is later reversed by any
court. Plaintiffs and their counsel further reserve their rights to seek an award of attorneys' fees
and costs if the Merger Transaction is not consummated or if the Settlement is not approved by
the Court. Defendants reserve their rights to oppose any such fee application.
7. Stay Pending Court Approval
Subject to the Court's approval, the Parties agree that the Federal Court
Action shall remain administratively closed pending the occurrence of the Effective Date, except
for such acts as may be necessary or appropriate to effectuate the Settlement. The Parties also
agree to use their best efforts to prevent, stay, and seek the dismissal of, and oppose entry of any
interim or final relief in favor of any Class Member in, any proceeding against any of the
(B1951034.1) 15
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 16 of 24
Released Persons which challenges the Settlement, the Merger Agreement (including any
transactions contemplated thereby), or otherwise involves, directly or indirectly, a Settled Claim.
8. Effect of Disapproval. Cancellation, or Termination
(a) If either (1) the Court does not enter the Judgment in substantially
the form of Exhibit A hereto, (ii) the Court enters the Judgment but on or following appellate
review the Judgment is modified or reversed in any material respect, or (iii) any other condition
of Paragraph 5 hereof is not satisfied, this Stipulation shall be cancelled and terminated unless
counsel for each of the Parties to this Stipulation, within (10) business days from receipt of such
ruling or event, agrees in writing with counsel for the other Parties hereto to proceed with this
Stipulation and Settlement, including only with such modifications, if any, as to which all other
Parties in their sole judgment and discretion may agree. For purposes of this Paragraph, an intent
to proceed shall not be valid unless it is expressed in a signed writing. Neither a modification
nor a reversal on appeal of the amount of attorneys' fees and expenses awarded by the Court to
Class Counsel shall be deemed a material modification of the Judgment or this Stipulation.
(b) If the Effective Date does not occur, if this Stipulation is
disapproved, canceled, or terminated pursuant to its terms, all the Parties to this Stipulation shall
be deemed to have reverted to their respective litigation status immediately prior to the execution
of the MOS, and they shall proceed in all respects as if the MOS and this Stipulation had not
been executed (except for Paragraphs 2(b), 8(a), 8(b), 9(b), 9(f)-9(k), 9(p) and 9(q) hereof, which
shall survive the occurrence of any such event) and the related orders had not been entered, and
in that event all of their respective claims and defenses as to any issue in the Shareholder Actions
shall be preserved without prejudice in any way whatsoever. Furthermore, if any such event
occurs, Plaintiffs and Class Counsel agree that neither the MOS nor this Stipulation, not any
(B1957034.1) 16
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 17 of 24
communications between the Parties, or their counsel, made in connection with the negotiation
of the MOS or this Stipulation, entitle any Party to recover any attorneys' fees or expenses
incurred in connection with the Shareholder Actions or in connection with any other litigation or
judicial proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Settlement is terminated, for any
reason whatsoever, Plaintiffs reserve the right to pursue a mootness petition or petitions for
attorneys' fees and expenses in connection with any benefits that may have been afforded to
ESB's shareholders as a result of the Actions. Defendants reserve the right to oppose such
petition(s). Further, Plaintiffs and their counsel may use the Stipulation or the MOS in
connection with such an application for an award of attorneys' fees and expenses but
Defendants' agreement to allow use of the Stipulation or MOS shall not be treated as a waiver or
limitation of any of the provisions of this paragraph of the Stipulation. This provision shall
remain in force in the event that the Settlement is terminated,
9. Miscellaneous Provisions
(a) All of the Exhibits referred to herein shall be incorporated by
reference as though fully set forth herein.
(b) This Stipulation may be amended or modified only by a written
instrument signed by counsel for each of the Parties hereto or their successors.
(c) The Parties represent and agree that the terms of the Settlement
were negotiated at arm's length and in good faith by the Parties, and reflect a resolution that was
reached voluntarily based upon adequate information and sufficient discovery and after
consultation with experienced legal counsel.
(8195034.1} 17
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 18 of 24
(d) If any deadline set forth in this Stipulation or the Exhibits hereto
fails on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, that deadline will be continued to the next business
day.
(e) The headings in the Stipulation are solely for the convenience of
the attorneys for the Parties and the Court. The headings shall not be deemed to be part of this
Stipulation and shall not be considered in construing or interpreting this Stipulation.
(f) Neither the MO S nor this Stipulation, nor the fact or any terms of
the Settlement, is evidence, or an admission or concession by any Party in the Shareholder
Actions, any signatory hereto, or any Released Person, of any fault, liability, or wrongdoing
whatsoever, as to any facts or claims alleged or asserted in the Shareholder Actions, or any other
actions or proceedings. Neither the MOS nor this Stipulation is a finding or evidence of the
validity or invalidity of any claims or defense in the Shareholder Actions, any wrongdoing by
any Released Person, or any damages or injury to any Class Member. Neither the MOS nor this
Stipulation or any negotiations, statements, or proceedings in connection therewith be construed
as a presumption, concession, or admission by any Party, any member of the Class, or any
Party's Counsel of any merit or lack of merit relating to the Settled Claims. Neither the MOS
nor this Stipulation, nor any of the terms and provisions of the MOS or the Stipulation, nor any
of the negotiations or proceedings in connection therewith, nor any of the documents or
statements referred to herein or therein, nor the Settlement, nor the fact of the Settlement, nor the
settlement proceedings, nor any statements in connection therewith, (1) shall (i) be argued to be,
used or construed as, offered or received in evidence as, or otherwise constitute an admission,
concession, presumption, proof, evidence, or a finding of any liability, fault, wrongdoing, injury
or damages, or any wrongful conduct, acts or omission on the part of any of the Released
{B19570341J 18
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 19 of 24
Persons, or of any infirmity of any defense, or of any damage to any Plaintiff or Class Member,
or (ii) otherwise be used to create or give rise to any inference or presumption against any of the
Released Persons concerning any fact alleged or that could have been alleged, or any claim
asserted or that could have been asserted in the Shareholder Actions, or of any purported
liability, fault, or wrongdoing of the Released Persons or of any injury or damages to any person
or entity, or (2) otherwise be admissible, referred to or used in any proceeding of any nature, in
any forum, for any purpose whatsoever; provided, however, that the Stipulation and/or Judgment
may be introduced in any proceeding, whether before the Court or otherwise, as may be
necessary to argue that the Stipulation and/or Judgment has res judicata, collateral estoppel, or
other issue or claim preclusion effect or to otherwise consummate or enforce the Settlement or
Judgment, and provided further that Plaintiffs also may refer to and utilize the Stipulation in
connection with any application for an award of attorneys' fees and expenses as agreed herein.
This provision shall remain in force in the event that the Settlement is terminated.
(g) In the event that the Court or any other court is called upon to
interpret this Stipulation, this Stipulation will be deemed to have been mutually prepared by the
Parties and will not be construed against any of them by reason of authorship.
(h) Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the December 23, 2014
Protective Order shall remain in effect and binding on the signatories thereto.
(i) The waiver by any Party of any breach of the Stipulation by any
other Party shall not be deemed a waiver of that or any other prior or subsequent breach of any
provision of the Stipulation by any other Party.
(j) This Stipulation and the Exhibits hereto constitute the entire
agreement among the Parties and supersede any prior agreements among the Parties with respect
BI957034,1) 19
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 20 of 24
to the subject matter hereof. No representations, warranties, or inducements have been made to
or relied upon by any Party concerning this Stipulation or its Exhibits, other than the
representations, warranties, and covenants expressly set forth in such documents. This
Stipulation may be amended or any of its provisions waived only by a writing executed by all the
Parties hereto.
(k) This Stipulation may be executed in one or more counterparts,
including by facsimile and electronic mail, and so executed shall constitute one agreement.
(1) The Parties and their respective counsel of record agree that they
will use their best efforts to obtain all necessary approvals of the Court required by this
Stipulation (including, but not limited to, using their best efforts to resolve any objections raised
to the Settlement).
(m) Plaintiffs and Class Counsel represent and warrant that Plaintiffs
have each been continuous stockholders of ESB throughout all relevant times, are Class
Members, and that none of the Plaintiffs' claims or causes of action relating to the Merger
Agreement have been assigned, encumbered, or otherwise transferred in any manner in whole or
in part.
(n) Each counsel signing this Stipulation represents and warrants that
such counsel has been duly empowered and authorized to sign this Stipulation on behalf of his or
her clients.
(o) This Stipulation shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit
of the Parties hereto and the Class (and, in the case of the releases, all Released Persons) and the
respective legal representatives, heirs, executors, administrators, transferees, successors and
{B19570341} 20
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 21 of 24
assigns of all such foregoing persons and upon any corporation, partnership, or other legal entity
into or with which any Party may merge, consolidate, or reorganize.
(p) Defendants have vigorously denied, and continue to deny
vigorously, any wrongdoing or liability with respect to all claims asserted in the Shareholder
Actions, including that they have committed any violations of law, that they have acted
improperly in any way, that they have any liability or owe any damages of any kind to Plaintiffs
or the Class, and that any additional disclosures (including the Supplemental Disclosures) are or
were required under any applicable rule, regulation, statute, or law, but are entering into this
Stipulation because they consider, and continue to consider, it desirable that the Shareholder
Actions be settled and dismissed with prejudice in order to, among other things, (i) eliminate the
burden, inconvenience, expense, risk, and distraction of further litigation, and (ii) finally put to
rest and terminate all the claims that were or could have been asserted against the Defendants in
the Shareholder Actions.
(q) The Settlement and Stipulation, and any and all disputes arising
out of or relating in any way to the Settlement or Stipulation, whether in contract, tort, or
otherwise, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, without regard to conflicts of law principles. Each of the
Parties (i) irrevocably submits to the personal jurisdiction of any federal court covering
Allegheny or Lawrence County, Pennsylvania, as well as to the jurisdiction of all courts to which
an appeal may be taken from such court, in any suit, action, or proceeding arising out of or
relating in any way to the Settlement or Stipulation, (ii) agrees that all claims in connection with
such suit, action, or proceeding shall be brought, heard, and determined exclusively in this Court
(provided that, in the event that subject matter jurisdiction is unavailable in the Federal Court,
{B19570341) 21
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 22 of 24
then all such claims shall be brought, heard, and determined exclusively in the State Court), (iii)
agrees that it shall not attempt to deny or defeat personal jurisdiction. (iv) agrees not to bring any
suit, action, or proceeding arising out of or relating in any way to the Settlement or Stipulation in
any other court, and (v) expressly waives, and agrees not to plead or make any claim that any
such suit, action, or proceeding is subject (in whole or in part) to a jury trial. Each of the Parties
waives any defense of inconvenient forum to maintenance of any suit, action, or proceeding
brought in accordance with this Paragraph. Each of the Parties further agrees to waive any bond,
surety, or other security that might be required of any other party with respect to any such action
or proceeding, including an appeal thereof. Each of the Parties further consents and agrees that
process in any such suit, action, or proceeding may be served on such Party by certified mail,
return receipt requested, addressed to such Party or such Party's registered agent in the state of
its incorporation or organization, or in any other manner provided by law, and, in the case of
Plaintiffs, giving such written notice to Mare L. Ackerman, Esq., Brodsky & Smith, LLC, 2 Bala
Plaza, Suite 510, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties, through their undersigned counsel, have executed
this Stipulation of Settlement effective as of the date first set forth above.
/s/AlfreclG. Yates. Jr. LAW OFFICE OF ALFRED G. YATES, JR.
Alfred G. Yates, Jr. (PA 17419) Gerald L. Rutledge (PA 62027) 519 Allegheny Building 429 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15219 (412) 391-5164 (412) 471-1033 (fax)
/s/ Mark D. Shepard Mark D. Shepard (PA 36902) BABST, CA.LLAND, CLEMENTS AND ZotviNiR,
P.C. Two Gateway Center, 6th Floor Pittsburgh, PA 15222 (412) 394-5400 (412)394-6576 (Facsimile) mshepard@babstealland. corn
(B1957034.1) 22
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 23 of 24
[email protected] Attorneys for Defendants ESB Bank and ESB Financial, Inc., Herbert S. S/tuba, Charlotte A.
OF COUNSEL: Zuschlag, James F. Wetzel, Jr., Mario I Manna and William B. Salsgiver
BRODSKY & SMITH, LLC Evan J. Smith Marc L. Ackerman Two Bala Plaza, Suite 510 Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 (610) 667-6200
Attorneys for Plaintiff James Elliott
/s/AndrewR. Stanton Andrew R. Stanton (PA 33410) Lauren Garraux (PA 207588) K&L GATES LLP 210 Sixth Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15222 (412) 355-6500 (412) 355-6501 (fax) andrew.stanton@kl gates. corn lauren, garraux(lUdgates. corn
Attorneys for Defendant WesBanco, Inc. and Wesbanco Bank, Inc.
Al Benjamin I Sweet CARLSON LYNCH SWEET & KJLPELA, LLP
Benjamin J. Sweet (PA 87338) Gary F. Lynch (PA 56887) 36 N. Jefferson Street New Castle, Pennsylvania 16107 Tel. (724) 656-1555
OF COUNSEL:
RIGRODSKY & LONG, P.A. Seth D. Rigrodsky Brian D. Long (PA 82370) Gina M. Serra (PA3 08207) 2 Righter Parkway, Suite 120 Wilmington, DE 19803 (302) 295-5310
THE ROSEN LAW Fm Laurence M. Rosen Phillip Kim 275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor New York, NY 10016 (212) 686-1060
(B1952034.1) 23
Case 2:14-cv-01689-MRH Document 18 Filed 04/28/15 Page 24 of 24
Attorneys for Plaintiff-Randall Kress in Kress v. E5'B Bank, et, al., Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 11 185114C
[131957034.1} 24