Jairaj 111
-
Upload
rajesh-kumar -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Jairaj 111
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
1/91
1
A STUDY ON THE HEALTHY, SAFETY AND WELFARE
MEASURES IN LUCAS- TVS LIMITED,
THIRUVANDARKOIL, PUDHUCHERRY
A PROJECT REPORT
Submitted by
K.JAYRAJ
(REG NO: 21610631020)
In partial fulfillment for the award of the degree
Of
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
SAVEETHA ENGINEERING COLLEGE
THANDALAM, CHENNAI
ANNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI
JUNE 2012
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
2/91
2
This is to certify that the project titled A STUDY ON THE HEALTHY, SAFETY
AND WELFARE MEASURES IN LUCAS- TVS LIMITED, THIRUVANDARKOIL,
PUDHUCHERRY is a bonafide research work carried out independently by
K.JAYRAJ , (REG NO: 21610631020)who carried out the project work under
my supervision.
SIGNATURE SIGNATURE
Mr. A. GANDHI Mr. MURUGAN MBA,
HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT ASST.PROFESSOR(OG),
Department of Management Studies Department of MBA
Saveetha Engineering College Saveetha Engineering College
Thandalam Thandalam
Chennai-105 Chennai-105
DECLARATION
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
3/91
3
I, JAYRAJ .Khereby declare that the project entitled A STUDY ON THE
HEALTHY, SAFETY AND WELFARE MEASURES IN LUCAS- TVS LIMITED,
THIRUVANDARKOIL, PUDHUCHERRY has been done by me as a partial
fulfillment for the award of degree Master of Business Administration. The
project report is drafted by me and is original to the best of my knowledge and
belief.
Place : Chennai Signature of the Student
Date :
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
4/91
4
I express my deep sense of gratitude to beloved Founder President,
Dr.N.M.VEERAIYAN for his encouragement and guidance.
I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to our honourable
PRESIDENT, DR. N.M.VEERAIYAN , and DIRECTOR DR. S.RAJESH ,
for his continuous support throughout the project.
I am indebted to the Head of the Department,MR. A. GANDHIfor his
constant support for this project.
I express my sincere thanks to my internal guide Asst.Professor,
MURUGAN MBA, for her valuable suggestion, encouragement, and support
for successful completion of the project.
I like to express my whole hearted gratitude to our internal guide MR.
CHANDRA MOULI Lecturer for her valuable suggestions and constant
encouragement for successful completion of this project.
I express my gratitude to Mr.SARAVANAN, HR Manager LUCAS TVSPUDHUCHERRY.For having allowed me to do the project in their esteemedorganization and for his constant support.
Finally I thank all the members of the college, staff for their help to complete
the project successfully.
Signature
DESCRIPTION OF THE WORK
CHAPTER-1 INTRODUCTION
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
5/91
5
CHAPTER-2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
CHAPTER-3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
CHAPTER-4 DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATIONS
CHAPTER-5 FINDINGS, SUGGESTIONS & CONCLUSIONS
ANNEXURE BIBLIOGRAPHY,
QUESTIONNAIRE.
TABLE OF CONTENT
CHAPTER NO TITLE PAGE NO
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 ABOUT THE STUDY 1
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
6/91
6
1.4 COMPANY PROFILE 6
1.5 OBJECTIVES OF STUDY 13
1.6 LIMITATION OF STUDY 14
1.7 SCOPE OF STUDY 12
2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
2.1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 25
3. RESEARCH METHODOLGY
3.1 RESEARCH DESIGN 15
3.2 COLLECTION OF DATA 16
3.3 SAMPLING TECHNIQUES 16
3.4 TOOLS TO BE USED 17
4. DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATIONS
5. FINDINGS, SUGGESTIONS, CONCLUSION.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
7/91
7
5.1 FINDINGS 72
5.2 SUGGESTIONS 78
5.3 CONCLUSION 79
ANNEXURE
BIBILIOGRAPHY
QUESTIONNAIRE 80
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
8/91
8
CHAPTER -I
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Human resources play a crucial role in the development process of modern economics.
Arthur Lewis observed, There are great differences in development between countries which
seem to have roughly equal resources, so it is necessary to inquire into difference in human
behavior. It is felt that though the exploitation of natural resources, availability of physical
and financial resources and international aid play prominent role in the growth of modern
economics, none of these factors is more significance than efficient and committed
manpower. It is in fact said that all development comes from human mind.
When individuals come to their workplace, they come with not only technical skill,
knowledge etc, but also with their personal feelings, perception, desires, motives, attitudes,
values etc. They want that some of their needs should be satisfied through the organization
for which they are working. Therefore employee management does mean management of not
only technical skills but also other of the human resources.
After employees have been hired, trained and remunerate, they need to be retained and
maintained to serve the organization better. Welfare facilities are designed to take care of the
well being of the employees. They do not generally result in any monetary benefit to the
employees. Nor these facilities provided by employers alone.
Governmental and non-governmental agencies and trade unions too, contribute towards
employee welfare. Welfare means faring or doing well. It is comprehensive term, and refers
to the physical, mental, moral and emotional well being of an individual. Further the term
welfare is a relative concept, relative in time and space. It therefore varies from time to time;
form region to region and from country to country. Lab our welfare also referred to as
betterment work for employees, relates to taking care of the well-being of workers by
employers, trade union, and government and non-government agencies.
Thousands of employees throughout the world lose their fingers, eyes, limbs and lives,
everyday. Much blood flows in the sewers of industrial establishments. The peril inherent in
industrial work has made the life of the worker very cheap. Safety in simple terms means
freedom from the occurrence of risk or injury or loss. Industrial personnel and administration
department at TVS-Lucas limited.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
9/91
9
Personal policy:
TVS-Lucas limited is strongly driven by the philosophy that HR is the strongest, most
valuable of all the responsibilities for every organization. Human nature is very complex and
to harness and get the best for the benefit of the organization, as well as individual utmost
care is exercised right from the stage of selection through the entire HRD.
In this direction the company tries to achieve the following.
Organization role by the participating team effort. Harmonious and synergetic employee-employer relations and welfare measures to develop
highest level of motivation, mutual respect, trust and co-operation.
Provide growth opportunities for each individual. Provide appropriate training and achieve full potentials of individual. Create and maintain environment and work culture and provide for speedy grievance re-
dresses for effective functioning of the organization.
Provides free and smooth communication channels.The personnel department undertakes the various functions like
1. Manpower planning and organizational charts.2. Selection and recruitment.3. Granting leaves.4. Leave travel assistance.5. Medicals reimbursement allowance.6. Loan schemes.7. Allowances.8. Transfer and re-location.9. Code of conducting discipline.10.Appraisal, increments and promotions.11.Training and development.12.Feedback system13.Separation and retirement.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
10/91
10
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
Human resource management has long been recognized by many developing nations as a
basic factor for socio-economic emancipation. It is a process that is concerned with the
improvement and growth of the capabilities of individuals and group a within the
organization. In the changed global scenario of industrial development which fosters a drive
competitiveness based on improved quality in all functions of an organization, concern on
occupational health safety and welfare have received special significance. In our modern
industrial society, the concept of labor welfare has gained significant importance.
Because, it is closely associated with the productivity of lobor, lobor turnover, absenteeism,
morale and other economic consideration of lobor.
In view of the above regard, to know the effect of these measures a study has been done on
the provision of the employee health safety and welfare measures in TVS-Lucas limited, the
Puducherry so as to study the effectiveness of these measures in building the morale of the
employees and increase in the productivity of the organization.
1.3 INDUSTRY PROFILE
The Automobile Industry in India is the seventh largest in the world with an annual
production of over 2.6 million units in 2009 India emerged as Asias fourth largest exporterof automobiles, behind Japan, south Korea and Thailand b 2050 the country is expected to
top the world in car volumes with approximately 611 million vehicles on the nations roads.
Following economic liberalization in India 1991, the Indian automotive industry has
demonstrated sustained growth as a result of competitiveness and relaxed restriction. Several
Indian automobile manufactures. Such as TATA Motors, Maruti Suzuki and Mahindra and
Mahindra, expanded their domestic and international operations. Indias robust economic
growth led to the further expansion of its domestic automobile market which attracted
significant India-specific investment by multinational automobile manufactures. In February
2009, monthly sales of passenger car in India exceeded 1, 00,000 units.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
11/91
11
Rank wise Largest Automobile Manufacturers in India by sales
Maruti Suzuki Hyuandai TATA Motors Mahindra & Mahindra GM Chevrolet Honda HSD Ford Fiat Motors
TVS-DIVISIONS:
Lucas-TVS have grown hand in hand with the automobile Industry in the country. The
companys policies have recognized the need to respond effectively to changing customer
needs helping to proper it to a position of reliability and flexibility by channeling its interest.
At present there are 7 divisions
Padi, Chennai Nettapakkam, Puducherry Rewari, Haryana Thiruvandarkoil, Puducherry Chakan, Pune Uttarakhand, Uttaranchal Indrad, Chennai
Competitors
Visteon Siemens IFD Bosch Remy Mitsuba are the competitors for Lucas-TVS
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
12/91
12
Departments in Lucas-TVS:
HR & Security Stores Customer Dispatch Centre Maintenance Purchase Production Quality Information Technology Finance Methods
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
13/91
13
1.4 COMPANY PROFILE
Lucas TVS Limited (Auto Electrical Division) is the third largest four wheeler and two
wheeler manufactures in India and among the top ten in the world, the TVS group has today
the largest auto motive component manufacturer in India, with annual turnover of more thanUSD 4 billion.
The TVS group has been inspired by a century long mission and vision of its own destiny. It
is not just a business, which differentiate TVS from others. The success of the group is its
philosophy of commitment to the cherished values of promoting trust, values and customer
service. This was the personal philosophy of the groups founder Shri TVS Sundharam
Iyenger, and it remains the overarching code by which the group functions.
About LucasTVS:LucasTVS was set up in 1961 as a joint venture of Lucas Industries Pvt Ltd., UK and T.V
Sundharam Iyengar & Sons [Tvs] India, to manufacture Automotive Electrical system one
top ten Automotive component suppliers in the world, Lucas-verity was formed by the
merger of the Lucas industries of the UK and the variety corporation of the US September
1996.
The company design, manufactures and suppliers advanced technology systems, products and
services to the worlds automotive, diesel engines and aerospace industries. The combination
of these two well-known groups has resulted in the establishment of a vibrant company,
which has had a successful track record of sustained growth over the last three decades.
Tvs is one of Indias twenty large industries hours with twenty-five manufacturing companies
and turnover in excess of us $1.3 million. The turnover of Lucas-TVS and its division is US
$23.3 million in 2003-2004. Lucas Indian services Indias leading source of sales and
services of auto-electrical and fuel injection equipment manufactured by Lucas-TVS in the
aftermarket segment. The branch on thiruvandarkovil was started I the year 2006.
MISSION & VISION:
MISSION:
To be a respected supplier in the global auto industry, by developing innovative products and
solution of value to customers creative skills and involvement of employees, suppliers and
dealers and use of contemporary technology.
VISION
Dominant supplier to all leading vehicle manufacturers in India.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
14/91
14
Strong presence in select NICHE market. Recognized supplier to vehicle / engine manufacturers in Europe for starters, alternators and
small motors.
By 2015, reach sales turnover of Rs.3500 Crorces (USD 770 million) with a third beingexport sales.
Customer delight and stake-holders pride will form the basis of all our activities.
QUALITY POLICY
We are committed to achieving ever increasing level of customer satisfaction through
continual improvements to the quality of our products and services by continually improving
the effectiveness of quality management system.It will be our Endeavour to increase customer trust and confidence in the label Made by
Lucas-TVS
QUALITY OBJECTIVES
Continual reduction of warranty returns. Deliver products to customer in right quality on time every time. Providing warranty services to customer within 48 hours of receiving complaints.
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
Eliminate, minimize and control adverse environmental impacts, occupational health andsafety risks at all levels and functions.
Institutionalize adoption of environmental friendly, health and safety concepts whiledesigning our products and processes.
Conserve resources by applying 3R concepts (reduce, reuse and recycle) and minimizegeneration of inevitable wastes.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
15/91
15
THE PHILOSOPHY OF TVS IS
Trust, Value & Service.NETWORK
The company deliver product quickly and at competitive rate at any part of india. Theproduction units are located in following places.
Chennai Puducherry Rewari Chakan Uttarkhand Indrad
CUSTOMERS
Maruti Udyog Ltd., TATA Engineering & Locomotive Company Ford India Mahindra Nissan Ashok Leyland General Motor India Hyundai Motors
CERTIFICATE & AWARDS
ISO / TS 16949 : 2009 BS OHSAS 18001 : 2007 ISO 14001 : 2004
Profile of the Company
Company Name Lucas-TVS Limited
Founder Shri.T.V.Sundaram Iyengar
Year of commencement at
Thiruvandarkoil2006
Nature of WorkManufacturing of Solenoid Switches, Wiper
Motor and Small Motors
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
16/91
16
Address
No.10, Kothapurinatham Main Road,
Thriuvandarkoil,
Puducherry-605 102.
India.Website www.lucastvs.com
Number of Employees 400
http://www.lucastvs.com/http://www.lucastvs.com/ -
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
17/91
17
1.5 PRODUCT PROFILE
Lucas-TVS, foremost leaders in the automotive today in India, service the full spectrum of
automobile sector such as passenger cars, commercial vehicles, tractors, jeep and off highway
vehicles as well as stationery & marine application. In facilities & services and it is fullygeared to meet the challenges of tomorrow. The product range of Lucas-TVS is
Solenoid switches Wiper motors Blower motors Power window motor (RM39)
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
18/91
18
1.6 NEED FOR THE STUDY
Human resource management is an evolving science. The organization which shown more
concern towards personnel working is found to be most cherished. Employees are endowed
with skills, knowledge, abilities, values, aptitude etc. they come to organization with all thesevarieties of human resources. Though the job and the organization mostly require employees
skills and knowledge, it is inevitable to the management to bear and respect the total
employee. The committed employee is the valuable asset to the company as he contributes
his maximum skill and knowledge. Further the committed employee is loyal to the company.
In the process of maintain human relations, the company provides congenial work
environment to its employees through providing health safety and welfare measures.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
19/91
19
1.7 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
Human resources play a crucial role in the development process of modern economics.
Human resource development has long been recognizing by many developing nations as a
factor for socio economic emancipation. It is a process that is concerned with theimprovement and growth of the capabilities of individuals and groups within the
organizations.
This study is confirmed to the TVS-Lucas limited only. It covered maximum number of
employees and workers from all the departments. Work environment as the Puducherry is
considered for research and projected the evolutionary study on Health, Safety and Welfare
Measures.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
20/91
20
1.8 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The a study on Health safety and welfare measures in the TVS-Lucas limited is having the
following basic objectives.
Primary Objectives:To study the health safety and welfare facilities provided to their employees.
Secondary Objective:
1. To analysis the extent of health safety and welfare facility in the organization2. To know the satisfactory level of employees health safety and welfare facility 3. To analyze the strength and weakness of health safety and welfare measures4. To suggest the possible measures to overcome the weakness of the organization
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
21/91
21
1.9 LIMITATION OF STUDY
There are certain limitations in the study of health, safety and welfare measures in TVS-
Lucas Limited. They are:
1. Important constraint is the hesitation from the side of employees and workers as they areunwilling to answer questions in the questionnaire.
2. Since names are mentioned in some of the questionnaire copies, most of the employeesanswered favorably to the company. This might have led to wrong findings in the study.
3. The major constraint is the method adopted for collecting the data.4. The findings of the study are confined only to the questions asked in the questionnaire.5. Time is important constraint as it was restricted only to a period of 25 days.6. The topic itself is a constraint as human resource management is an evolving concept.7. Only a limited number of respondents are considered for study as the sample size is only 133
and so it restricts the total respondents of all the workmen and employees regarding health
and safety measures.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
22/91
22
2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The search of knowledge through objective and systematic method of finding solution to a
problem is called research.
Research method or techniques, thus refer to the methods the researchers use in performingresearch operations. Research methodology is a way to systematically solve the research
problem.
Data Collection:
For the study regarding health safety and welfare measures in TVS-Lucas limited, both
primary and secondary sources of data are used.
Primary Data:Primary data has been collected from the respondents selected for the study.
Interview have been conducted with the help of a structured questionnaire which consists of
different questions relating to the health safety and welfare measures provided in the TVS-
Lucas limited.
Secondary Data:
Secondary data has been collected mainly from the records, reports, notes, and accounts etc.which are retained by the company for further requirements. In addition various books and
journals have been referred.
2.1 Research Problem
To know the effect of these measures a study has been done on the provision of the employee
health safety and welfare measures in TVS-Lucas limited, the puducherry so as to study the
effectiveness of these measures in building the morale of the employees and increase in the
productivity of the organization. Statistical tool chi-square test has been taken to measure the
awareness of employees about varies welfare measures followed by the company.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
23/91
23
2.2 Source of Data
There are to sources one is primary source second is indirect source this study was conducted
with the help of primary data like company account books, journal, direct inter views a
questioners etc. and secondary sources is newspapers wearies websites and otherpublications.
2.3 Research Design
Research design is the arrangement of conditions for collection and analysis of data in a
manner that aims to combine relevance to the research purpose with economy in procedure.
Descriptive research design is adapted for the present project out of 400 population 68
sample were taken end responses were obtained through questionnaire.
2.4 Tools & Techniques
Chi square test Two step cluster Anova Disciminant Regressions Correlations Multi discriminant analysis factor analysis One way
2.5 Sampling Design
Sampling Unit:
All the employees and workmen of TVS-Lucas limited, the puducherry constitute the
sampling unit.
Sampling Size:
The sampling size for the study in TVS-Lucas limited is 68
Sampling Method:
The method adopted here is the convenient sampling method and pilot method.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
24/91
24
Questionnaire:
A structured, close end questionnaire was designed and used for the study.
Statistical Tools:
The collected samples are interpreted with the help of statistical tools like mean scoreanalysis.
Presentations:
Entire information collected in the form of questionnaire is put forth in the form of tables and
graphs.
2.6 Sample SizeSample size is 68 out of total population 400 ware convenient non probability sample
selection was followed
1.9.7 Area of Survey
The survey was conducted at TVS-Lucas limited, pondicherry town where majority of the
respondents were belongs to rural arias
2.10 Chapterization
Chapter: 1
Need of study, scope of the study, objectives of the study, research methodology, limitations
of the study, and review of literature consisting industry profile and company profile.
Chapter: 2
Review of literaturetheoretical concepts related to research problem
Chapter: 3
Data analysis and inference tabulation, graphical representation and inference of collected
data
Chapter: 4
Findings of the study, suggestions and conclusions of the study
Appendices
AppendixI Questionnaire
AppendixII Bibliography
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
25/91
25
THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
2.1 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND:
Meaning:
The Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 complete a series of six sets
of health and safety regulations implementing EC Directives, and replace a number of old
and often excessively detailed laws.
They cover a wide range of basic health, safety and welfare issues and, unlike the Factories
Act 1961 and the Offices, Shops and Railway Premises Act 1963, apply to most workplaces
(except construction sites and some mineral extraction sites).
This leaflet gives a brief outline of the requirements of the Regulations, and has been
produced as part of the Health and Safety Commission's commitment under the Review of
Regulation to produce simple guidance for small firms to cover key areas of risk.
HEALTH OF WORKERS:
Section 11 to 20 of the Act deals with the rules relating to health of workers. These rules are
intended to ensure good working conditions in a factory. This Act requires an employer to
provides the following facilities in his factory
.
Cleanliness: [sec 11]
Every factory has to be kept clean and free from effluvia arising from any drains, privy or
other nuisance. The enactment of this section is a sequel to the fact that in a number of
factories, the manufacturing processes disseminate large amounts of dust, arrangements for
the diminution of which are frequently defective.
Disposal of waste and effluents: [sec12]
Every occupier of a factory shall make effective arrangements for the treatment of wastes and
effluents due to the manufacturing process carries on the factory so as to render them
innocuous and for their disposal. Such arrangements should be in accordance with the rules,
if any, laid down by the state government. If the state government has not laid down any rules
in this respect, arrangements made by the occupier should be approved by the prescribed
authority if required, by the state government.
Ventilation and temperature: [sec 13]
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
26/91
26
Effective and suitable provisions have to be made, for proper ventilation and reasonable
temperatures, for adequate circulation of fresh air and for reasonable conditions of comfort to
the workers and also to prevent injury to health
Dust and fume: [sec 14]
There are certain manufacturing processes like chemical, textile or jute etc., which generate
lot of dust, fume or other impurities. It is injurious to the health of workers employed in such
manufacturing process. Effective measures should be taken to prevent the inhalation and
accumulation of dust, fumes etc., in the workrooms. Wherever necessary, exhaust appliances
should be fitted as far as possible, at the point of origin of dust, fumes or other impurities.
Such points shall also be enclosed as far as possible.
Artificial humidification: [sec15]
The State Government may make rules regarding standard of humidification, etc., in factories
where the humidity in the air is artificially increased. Humidification is employed in India in
cotton textile mills and in a few cigarette making factories.
Overcrowding: [sec 16]
Overcrowding in the work-room not only affects the workers in their efficient discharge of
duties but their health also has been provided with a view to prohibit overcrowding in the
work rooms to the extent it is injuries to the health of the workers. Apart from this general
prohibition, a minimum of working space for each worker, at 14.2 cubic meters of space per
worker in every workroom is to be provided.
Lighting: [sec 17]
Ever factory must provide and maintain sufficient and suitable lighting, natural, or artificial
or both in the work place or processing place of a factory. All the glazed windows and
skylight should be kept clean on both sides. Effective provisions should be made for the
prevention of glare from a source of light or by reflection from a smooth or polished surface.
Drinking water: [sec 18]
Every Factory should make effective arrangements for sufficient supply of drinking water for
all the workers in the factory free from impurities. Water should be supplied at suitable points
for the convenient of all workers. In case where more than 250 workers are ordinarily
employed, effective arrangement should be made for cooling of drinking water during hot
weather.
Latrines and urinals: [sec 19]
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
27/91
27
Every factory shall make suitable arrangement for the provision of latrines and urinals for the
workers in the prescribed standards. These should be conveniently situated and accessible to
all workers during working hours. The floors, walls, sanitary pan, etc., or latrines and urinals
shall be washed and cleaned with suitable detergents and/or disinfectants, at least once in
every seven days.
Spittoons: [sec 20]
Every factory should have sufficient number of spittoons situated at convenient places. These
should be maintained in a clean and hygienic condition. The state government is empowered
to make rules regarding the type and number of spittoons, their location and standard of
cleanliness.
SAFETY OF WORKERS:
Section 21 to 40 of this Act provides a number of provisions to secure a very high standard of
safety to the workers in a factory. It is an absolute and continuous duty of the occupier of a
factory to comply with the safety provisions laid down in this Act. Following are the safety
provisions of the Factories Act.
Fencing of machinery: [sec 21]
In every factory every moving part of a prime mover and every fly wheel connected to a
prime mover shall be securely fenced by safeguards of substantial construction which shall be
constantly maintained and kept in position while the parts of machinery they are fencing are
in motion or in use.
Work on or near in motion: [sec 22]
The procedure for carrying out examination of any part while it is in motion. In case where
the examination of machinery, while in motion is necessary, such examination or operation
shall be carried out only by specially trained male adult worker wearing tight fitting clothes.
Employment of young persons on dangerous machine:[sec 23]
No young person shall be required or allowed to work at any machine to which sec.21 applies
unless he has been fully instructed as to the dangers arising in connection with the machines
and the precautions to be observed.
Striking gears and devices for cutting off power: [sec 24]
In every factory suitable striking gear or other efficient mechanical appliance shall be
provided and maintained and used to move driving belts to and from fast and loose pulleys
which form part of the transmission machinery. Suitable devices for cutting off power, in
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
28/91
28
emergencies, from a running machinery shall be provided and maintained in every work-
room in every factory.
Self acting machines: [sec 25]
No traversing part of a self acting machine in any factory and no material carried there onshall, if the space over which it runs is a space over which any persons is liable to pass,
whether in the course of his employment or otherwise, be allowed to run on its outward or in
ward traverse within a distance of forty centimeters from any fixed structure which is not part
of the machine.
Casing of new machinery: [sec 26]
All machinery driven by power and installed in any factory after the commencement of the
Act, every set of screw, bolt or key on any revolving shaft, spindle, wheel or pinion shall be
so sunk, encased or otherwise effectively guarded as to prevent danger.
Prohibition of employment of women and children near cotton openers: [sec 27]
No woman or child shall be employed in any part of a factory for pressing cotton opener is at
work, unless the feed end of a cotton opener is in a room separated from the delivery end by a
partition.
Hoists and lifts: [sec 28]
Every hoist and lift shall be of good mechanical construction, sound material and adequate
strength and it shall be properly maintained and shall be thoroughly examined by a competent
person, once in every six months. The maximum safe working load shall be marked on every
hoist or lift and no load more than such load capacity shall be carried thereon.
Lifts, machines, chains, ropes and lifting tackles: [sec 29]
Every lifting machine (other than a hoist and lift) and every chain, rope and lifting tackle
shall be of good construction, sound material and adequate strength and free from defects and
it shall be properly maintained and it shall be thoroughly examined once in 12 months by a
competent person.
Revolving machinery: [sec 30]
In every factory in which the said process of grinding is carried on there shall be permanently
affixed to or placed near each machine in use a notice indicating the maximum safe working
peripheral speed of every grindstone or abrasive wheel, the speed of the shaft or spindle upon
which the wheel is mounted and the diameter of the pulley upon such shaft of spindle
necessary to secure such safe working peripheral speed.
Pressure plant: [sec31]
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
29/91
29
In any factory, any plant and machinery or any part thereof is operated at a pressure above
atmospheric pressure, effective measures shall be taken to ensure that the safe working
pressure of such plant or machinery or part is not exceeded.
Floors stairs and means of access: [sec 32]
In a factory all floors, steps, passages and gangways shall be of sound construction and
properly maintained and shall be kept free from obstructions and substances likely to cause
persons to slip and if necessary handrails may be provided.
Pits, sumps, opening in floors: [sec 33]
In every factory fixed vessel, sump, tank, pit or opening in the ground or in a floor which by
reasons of its depth situation construction or contents is or may be source of danger, shall be
either securely covered or securely fenced.
Excessive weights: [sec 34]
No person shall be employed in any factory to lift, carry or move any load so heavy as to be
likely to cause him injury.
Protection of eyes: [sec35]
If in a factory where the manufacturing process involves risk of injury to the eyes from
particles of fragments thrown off in the course of the process or risk to the eyes by reason of
exposure to excessive light then effective screen or goggles may be provided to the protection
of the workers.
Precaution against dangerous fumes, gases, etc: [sec 36]
No person shall be required or allowed to enter any chamber, tank or vat, pit, pipe flue or
other confined space in any factory in which any gas, fume, vapour or dust is likely to be
present to such an extent as to involve risk to persons being overcome thereby, unless it is
provided with a manhole of adequate size or other effective means of egress.
Precautions in case of fire: [sec 37]
In every factory all practical measures shall be taken to prevent outbreak of fire, and its
spread, both internally and externally and to provide and maintain safety measures like
equipments for fire extinguishing devices and to have emergency exists.
Safety of buildings and machinery: [sec 38]
If it appears to the Inspector that any buildings or part of a building or any part of the ways,
machinery or plant in a factory is in such a condition that it is dangerous to human life or
safety then the occupier or manager or both may by order in writing specify the measures to
be taken and if necessary prohibit the use until it has been properly repaired or altered.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
30/91
30
Maintenance of buildings: [sec 39]
If it appears to the Inspector that any buildings or part of a building is detrimental to the
health and welfare of the workers, he may serve on the occupier or manager or both of the
factory an order regarding the remedial measures.
Safety officers: [sec 40]
In every factory wherein one thousand or more workers are ordinarily employed the occupier
shall, if so required by the state government by notification in the official Gazette, employ
such number of Safety Officers as may be specified on the notification.
WELFARE MEASURES:
Washing Facilities:
In every factory adequate facilities for washing shall be provided and maintained for the use
of the workers. Separately and adequately screened facilities shall be provided for the use of
male and female workers.
Facilities for storing and drying facilities:
The State Government shall make rules in respect of a factory or class or description of
factories requiring the provision therein of suitable places for keeping clothing not worn
during working hours and for the drying of wet clothing.Facilities for sitting:
In every factory suitable arrangements for sitting shall be provided and maintained for all
workers obliged to work in a standing position, in order that they take advantage of any
opportunities for rest which may occur in the course of the work.
First aid appliances:
Every factory shall maintain and provide one first aid box with prescribed contents for every
150 workers and it shall be in charge of a responsible person who holds a certificate in firstaid treatment, recognized by State Government.
Canteen:
The State Government may make rules requiring that in any specified factory wherein two
hundred and fifty workers are ordinarily employed, a canteen or canteens shall be provided
and maintained by the occupier for the use of the workers.
Shelters rest rooms and lunch rooms:
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
31/91
31
In every factory wherein more than one hundred and fifty workers are ordinarily employed,
adequate and suitable shelters or rest rooms and a suitable lunch room with provision for
drinking water, where workers can eat meals brought by them.
Crches:
In every factory where more than thirty women are ordinarily employed there shall be
provided and maintained a suitable room or rooms for the use of children under the age of six
years of such women.
Welfare Officers:
In every factory wherein five hundred or more workers are ordinarily employed the occupier
shall employ in the factory such number of Welfare Officers as may be prescribed.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
32/91
32
3. LITERATURE REVIEW
Introduction
A proper definition and cut explanation of the concepts used in this study will help in better
understanding of the discussion carried on. Concept is a word or phrase which symbolizes
the phenomenon and helps to communicate the findings. It is a fertilization of an idea. It is
abstracted from the sense of perception. Therefore, before proceeding with the actual analysis
and discussion of the problems, some of the concepts used in this study are clearly defined.
To have a better understanding of the present study in its proper perspective, we must know
what has already been done in the field. Thus after selections of the topic, all relevant
material have been reviewed by the researcher. A review of such studies has been presented
below.Ashok Kumar, (1989) the researcher conducted a study on the attitude of the workers on
labour welfares, especially the canteen facilities in Cethar vessels limited, tiruchirappalli.
The main objective of the study was, to know the welfare measure provided by the industry
and to know the family structure of the workers. He found that the workers are not satisfied
with the welfare measures provided in the industry especially the canteen facilities should be
improved.
Nilzvazhagan.k, (1991) the researcher conducted a study on the profile of employee welfaremeasures at trichy distilleries and chemicals (p) ltd, senthaneerpuram. Triuchirappalli.
The objectives of the study was to know the statutory and non statutory welfare measures
provided in the industry, and to know the opinion of the employees, he was also inter elated
to know the other the other benefits. Which the company provides, he found out that the
company provided maximum facilities however suggestion was made to improve the rest
room, proper recreational facilities and to provides leave concession facilities to the
employees along with other facility already available.
Ravi Kumar (1993) the researcher conducted a study on the economic conditions and labour
welfare in tan-tea gundalur, niligris district. The objectives of the study was to know the
opinion of tan-tea workers about labour welfare, economic conditions income and
expenditure pattern of the tan-tea workers and inter personal relationship, that is prevailing in
v. After doing his researcher found that good relationship prevails in tan-tea among the
workers. Majority of the workers are satisfied with the work, but they are not satisfied with
the wages. Workers are not satisfied with the medical facilities. He has suggested improving
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
33/91
33
the medical facilities in the tan-tea he also suggested that the wage structure also to be
improved.
Robinson e (1994) the researcher conducted a study on labour welfare measures provided by
bhel trichy with objectives to analyze and interpret on welfare measures. The finding of the
study was the workers are satisfied with canteen facility safety equipment facilities provided
by bhel all the employees have been extended with hospital facilities. He suggested that there
be some improvement of housing and transport facilities.
Ramathunisha (1995) has conducted research on a study on working conditions and labour
welfare measures in bharat heavy electrical limited, tiruchirappalli. The objective of the study
was to know the various measures provided by bharat heavy electrical limited. And find out
the adequacy of welfare measures provided by the employee from the employees point of
view and to suggest ways and means to improve the working conditions and welfare
facilities. The researcher has found out that in all categories, majority of workers are satisfied
with the provision. The researcher has failed to give suggestions where in which she has
mentioned in her objective of the study.
Perumal.a, (1996) the researcher conducted a on a study on labour welfare measures in
Indian railways with reference to southern railway at ponnmalai workshop, tiruchirappalli.
With the objective to study the welfare measures in central workshop he found that the
welfare measures provided were satisfactory. He suggested that the trade union must take
steps improving the recreational facilities and problems in specific areas like canteen and
hospital facilities.
Prasanna venkatesan (1999) the researcher conducted a study on attitudes of workers welfare
measure provided in tvs iyendat & sons ltd, tiruchirappalli. Labour is one of the basic
resources play a significant role in the socio-economic development of the country.
More welfare facilities and good working condition will make the worker feel at home
therefore, they can concentrate more on their work by increasing productivity the workers can
get more wages and at the same time the management may get more profit out of it the
overall opinion is a sense of satisfaction among the workers about the safety facility
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
34/91
34
CHAPTER-IV
4.DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION
4.1 DATA ANALYSISTable 4.1
Age
Age
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
16 to 19 11 16.2 16.2 16.2
20 to 23 45 66.2 66.2 82.4
24 to 27 6 8.8 8.8 91.2
27 above 6 8.8 8.8 100.0
Total 68 100.0 100.0
Chart 4.1
Inference
From the above table it is inferred that 66.2% of the respondents belongs to the age of 20 to23 and 16% respondents belongs to the age of 16 to 19.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
35/91
35
Table 4.2
Gender
Gender
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
Male 18 26.5 26.5 26.5
Female 50 73.5 73.5 100.0
Total 68 100.0 100.0
Chart 4.2
Inference
From the above table it is inferred that 73.5 % of the respondents are Female and 26.5%respondents are Male.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
36/91
36
Table 4.3
Educational Qualification
Educational Qualification
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
12th 18 26.5 26.5 26.5
Diploma 36 52.9 52.9 79.4
BE 2 2.9 2.9 82.4
B.Com 2 2.9 2.9 85.3
BBA 2 2.9 2.9 88.2
ITT 4 5.9 5.9 94.1
M.Com 2 2.9 2.9 97.1
MBA 1 1.5 1.5 98.5
BCA 1 1.5 1.5 100.0
Total 68 100.0 100.0
Chart 4.3
Inference
From the above table it is inferred that 52.9% of the respondents educational qualification isDiploma and 26.5% respondents qualifications is 12 th.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
37/91
37
Table 4.4
Designation
Designation
Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative
Percent
Valid
Engineer 10 14.7 14.7 14.7
Operator 20 29.4 29.4 44.1
Technical 3 4.4 4.4 48.5
Short term trainee 34 50.0 50.0 98.5
Account assistance 1 1.5 1.5 100.0
Total 68 100.0 100.0
Chart 4.4
Inference
From the above table it is inferred that 50% of the respondents belongs to Short term trainee
and 29.4% respondents belongs to Operators
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
38/91
38
Table 4.5
Income
Income
Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative
Percent
Valid
3000 to 10000 58 85.3 85.3 85.3
10001 to 17000 2 2.9 2.9 88.2
17001 to 24000 5 7.4 7.4 95.6
24000 above 3 4.4 4.4 100.0
Total 68 100.0 100.0
Chart 4.5
Inference
From the above table it is inferred that 85.3% of the respondents income level is Rs 3000 to
Rs 10000 and 7.4% respondents income level is Rs 17001 to Rs 24000
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
39/91
39
Table 4.6
Marital status
Marital status
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
Married 7 10.3 10.3 10.3
Single 61 89.7 89.7 100.0
Total 68 100.0 100.0
Chart 4.6
Inference
From the above table it is inferred that 89.7% of the respondents are Single and 10.3%respondents are Married.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
40/91
40
Table 4.7
Age Vs Safety Policy, Safety & health recorders, Training levels, Safety & Health Duties
Report
Age Safety Policy Safety and healthrecorders Training levels Safety and HealthDuties
16 to 19
Mean 4.64 4.64 4.91 4.55
N 11 11 11 11
Std. Deviation .924 .505 .302 .688
20 to 23
Mean 4.51 4.33 4.20 4.11
N 45 45 45 45
Std. Deviation .661 .739 .944 1.027
24 to 27
Mean 4.33 3.83 3.67 4.50
N 6 6 6 6
Std. Deviation .516 .753 .816 .548
27 above
Mean 4.83 4.83 4.83 5.00
N 6 6 6 6
Std. Deviation .408 .408 .408 .000
Total
Mean 4.54 4.38 4.32 4.29
N 68 68 68 68
Std. Deviation .679 .713 .888 .931
Chart4.7
Inference
From the above table it is inferred that most of the respondents are agree with safety and healthrecorders, Training levels & Safety and health duties, and they are strongly agree with Safety Policy
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
16 to 19 20 to23 24 to 27 Above 27 Total
Safety Policy
Safety and health
recorders
Training levels
Safety and Health Duties
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
41/91
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
42/91
42
Inference
From the above table it is inferred that most of the respondents are agree with Tool-boxbriefings & safety checks, Safety committee, Safety aspects in site planning & layout andTraining.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
43/91
43
Table 4.9
Age Vs Traffic Control System, Facilities for preparing & eating food, Sufficient &
suitable washing facility, Enough training can be given
Report
Age Traffic control systemFacilities for preparing
and eating foodSufficient and suitable
washing facilityEnough training can be
given
16 to 19
Mean 4.55 4.55 4.64 4.45
N 11 11 11 11
Std. Deviation 1.036 .934 1.206 .688
20 to 23
Mean 4.29 4.13 4.40 4.09
N 45 45 45 45
Std. Deviation .843 1.140 .837 .793
24 to 27
Mean 4.00 4.33 3.83 4.00
N 6 6 6 6
Std. Deviation 1.095 .516 .408 .632
27 above
Mean 4.50 4.17 3.67 4.17
N 6 6 6 6
Std. Deviation .837 .753 1.506 .753
Total
Mean 4.32 4.22 4.32 4.15
N 68 68 68 68
Std. Deviation .888 1.034 .969 .758
Chart 4.9
Inference:It is inferred that most of the respondents are agree with TCS, Facilities for preparing &eating food, Sufficient, suitable washing facility & enough training can be given.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
16 to 19 20 to23 24 to 27 Above 27 Total
Traffic control system
Facilities for preparing
and eating food
Sufficient and suitable
washing facility
Enough training can be
given
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
44/91
44
Table 4.10
Age Vs Drinking Water, Escape routes in case of fire, Smoking is prohibited,
Mechanical power
Report
Age Drinking WaterEscape routes in case of
fireSmoking is prohibited Mechanical power
16 to 19
Mean 4.82 4.64 4.55 4.64
N 11 11 11 11
Std. Deviation .405 .924 1.214 .924
20 to 23
Mean 4.36 4.67 4.29 4.60
N 45 45 45 45
Std. Deviation 1.004 .564 1.079 .580
24 to 27
Mean 4.33 4.50 4.00 4.17
N 6 6 6 6
Std. Deviation .516 .548 .632 .753
27 above
Mean 5.00 4.83 4.33 4.83
N 6 6 6 6
Std. Deviation .000 .408 .516 .408
Total
Mean 4.49 4.66 4.31 4.59
N 68 68 68 68
Std. Deviation .872 .614 1.026 .652
Chart 4.10
InferenceIt is inferred that most of the respondents are agree with Drinking water and Smoking.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
16 to 19 20 to23 24 to 27 Above 27 Total
Drinking Water
Smoking is probited
Mechanical power
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
45/91
45
Table 4.11
Age Vs Sitting position, Material, tools and teeth of cutting tools, , Hand tools, Hammer,
chisels
Report
Age Sitting position Material, tools and teeth of cutting tools Hand tools Hammer, chisels
16 to 19
Mean 3.82 4.55 4.45 4.64
N 11 11 11 11
Std. Deviation 1.537 1.214 .934 .674
20 to 23
Mean 3.51 3.89 4.18 3.98
N 45 45 45 45
Std. Deviation 1.236 1.210 .747 1.011
24 to 27
Mean 3.50 4.00 4.17 3.67
N 6 6 6 6
Std. Deviation 1.225 .894 .753 1.033
27 above
Mean 3.67 3.83 4.33 4.17
N 6 6 6 6
Std. Deviation 1.033 .983 .816 .753
Total
Mean 3.57 4.00 4.24 4.07
N 68 68 68 68
Std. Deviation 1.250 1.172 .775 .967
Chart 4.11
Inference
From the above table it is inferred that most of the respondents are agree with Sittingposition, Material, tools and teeth of cutting tools, Hand tools and Hammer, chisel
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
16 to 19 20 to23 24 to 27 Above 27 Total
Sitting position
Material, tools and teeth
of cutting tools
Hand tools
Hammer, chisels
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
46/91
46
Table 4.12
Age vs Edges are teeth of cutting, First aid box, Precautionary indication, Safety items
Report
Age Edges are teeth of cutting First aid box Precautionary indication Safety items
16 to 19
Mean 4.36 4.91 4.73 4.45
N 11 11 11 11
Std. Deviation 1.206 .302 .647 1.293
20 to 23
Mean 3.78 4.49 4.38 4.07
N 45 45 45 45
Std. Deviation 1.146 .787 .834 1.009
24 to 27
Mean 3.67 4.50 4.17 3.83
N 6 6 6 6
Std. Deviation .816 .548 .408 .753
27 above
Mean 3.83 4.50 4.67 4.50
N 6 6 6 6
Std. Deviation .408 .837 .816 .837
Total
Mean 3.87 4.56 4.44 4.15
N 68 68 68 68
Std. Deviation 1.091 .720 .780 1.026
Chart 4.12
InferenceIt is inferred that most of the respondents are agree with Edges are teeth of cutting,
precautionary indication and Safety, and some of the respondents are strongly agree withFirst aid box
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
16 to 19 20 to23 24 to 27 Above 27 Total
Edges are teeth of cutting
First aid box
Precautionary indication
Safety items
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
47/91
47
Table 4.13
Age vs Ventilation facilities, Artificial humidification and Medical facility
Report
Age Ventilation facilities Artificial humidification Medical facility
16 to 19
Mean 4.64 4.91 4.64
N 11 11 11
Std. Deviation .505 .302 .924
20 to 23
Mean 3.96 4.44 4.07
N 45 45 45
Std. Deviation 1.021 .725 1.031
24 to 27
Mean 4.17 3.67 3.83
N 6 6 6
Std. Deviation 1.169 1.033 1.472
27 above
Mean 4.83 4.33 4.67
N 6 6 6
Std. Deviation .408 .816 .516
Total
Mean 4.16 4.44 4.19
N 68 68 68
Std. Deviation .971 .761 1.040
Chart 4.13
Inference
From the above table it is inferred that most of the respondents are agree with Ventilationfacilities, Artificial humidification and Medical facility.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
16 to 19 20 to23 24 to 27 Above 27 Total
Ventilation facilities
Artificial humidification
Medical facility
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
48/91
48
Table 4.14
Gender vs Safety Policy, Safety and health recorders, Training levels and safety and
Health Duties
Report
Gender Safety PolicySafety and
health recordersTraining levels
Safety andHealth Duties
Male
Mean 4.50 4.28 4.06 4.22
N 18 18 18 18
Std. Deviation .618 .826 1.162 1.166
Female
Mean 4.56 4.42 4.42 4.32
N 50 50 50 50
Std. Deviation .705 .673 .758 .844
Total
Mean 4.54 4.38 4.32 4.29
N 68 68 68 68
Std. Deviation .679 .713 .888 .931
Chart 4.14
Inference
From the above table it is inferred that most of the respondents are agree with Safety andhealth recorders, Training levels and safety and health duties, and some of the respondents
are strongly agree with Safety Policy.
3.8
3.9
4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
Male Female Total
Safety Policy
Safety and health
recorders
Training levels
Safety and Health Duties
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
49/91
49
Table 4.15
Gender vs Tool-box briefings and safety checks, Safety committee, Safety aspects in site
planning and layout and Training
Report
GenderTool-box
briefings andsafety checks
Safety committeeSafety aspects insite planning and
layoutTraining
Male
Mean 4.33 4.39 4.50 4.17
N 18 18 18 18
Std. Deviation .594 .850 .618 .857
Female
Mean 4.08 4.22 4.24 4.18
N 50 50 50 50
Std. Deviation 1.226 .790 .822 .850
Total
Mean 4.15 4.26 4.31 4.18
N 68 68 68 68
Std. Deviation 1.096 .803 .778 .845
Chart 4.15
Inference
From the above table it is inferred that most of the respondents are agree with Tool-box
briefings and safety checks, Safety committee, Safety aspects in site planning and layout andTraining.
3.8
3.9
4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
Male Female Total
Tool-box briefings and
safety checks
Safety committee
Safety aspects in siteplanning and layout
Training
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
50/91
50
Table 4.16
Gender vs Traffic control system, Facilities for preparing and eating food, Sufficient
and suitable washing facility and enough training can be given
Report
GenderTraffic control
system
Facilities forpreparing andeating food
Sufficient andsuitable
washing facility
Enough trainingcan be given
Male
Mean 4.50 3.94 4.17 4.17
N 18 18 18 18
Std. Deviation .857 1.211 1.043 .707
Female
Mean 4.26 4.32 4.38 4.14
N 50 50 50 50
Std. Deviation .899 .957 .945 .783
Total
Mean 4.32 4.22 4.32 4.15
N 68 68 68 68
Std. Deviation .888 1.034 .969 .758
Chart 4.16
Inference
From the above table it is inferred that most of the respondents are agree with Traffic control
system, Facilities for preparing and eating food, Sufficient and suitable washing facility andenough training can be given
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
Male Female Total
Traffic control system
Facilities for preparing
and eating food
Sufficient and suitable
washing facility
Enough training can be
given
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
51/91
51
Table 4.17
Gender vs Drinking Water, Escape routes in case of fire, Smoking is prohibited and
Mechanical power
Report
Gender Drinking WaterEscape routes in
case of fireSmoking isprohibited
Mechanicalpower
Male
Mean 4.83 4.72 4.22 4.67
N 18 18 18 18
Std. Deviation .383 .461 .808 .594
Female
Mean 4.36 4.64 4.34 4.56
N 50 50 50 50
Std. Deviation .964 .663 1.099 .675
Total
Mean 4.49 4.66 4.31 4.59
N 68 68 68 68
Std. Deviation .872 .614 1.026 .652
Chart 4.17
Inference
From the above table it is inferred that most of the respondents are agree with Drinking waterand Smoking is prohibited, and some of the respondents are strongly agree with Escaperoutes in case of fire and Mechanical.
3.9
4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
Male Female Total
Drinking Water
Escape routes in case of
fire
Smoking is probited
Mechanical power
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
52/91
52
Table 4.18
Gender vs Sitting position, Material, tools and teeth of cutting tools, Hand tools and
Hammer, chisels
Report
Gender Sitting positionMaterial, tools
and teeth ofcutting tools
Hand tools Hammer, chisels
Male
Mean 3.67 3.94 4.17 4.00
N 18 18 18 18
Std. Deviation 1.085 .873 .618 1.188
Female
Mean 3.54 4.02 4.26 4.10
N 50 50 50 50
Std. Deviation 1.313 1.270 .828 .886
Total
Mean 3.57 4.00 4.24 4.07
N 68 68 68 68
Std. Deviation 1.250 1.172 .775 .967
Chart 4.18
Inference
From the above table it is inferred that most of the respondents are agree with Sittingposition, Material, tools and teeth of cutting tools, Hand tools and Hammer, chisels.
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
Male Female Total
Sitting position
Material, tools and teeth
of cutting tools
Hand tools
Hammer, chisels
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
53/91
53
Table 4.19
Gender vs Edges are teeth of cutting, First aid box, Precautionary indication and Safety
items
Report
GenderEdges are teeth
of cuttingFirst aid box
Precautionaryindication
Safety items
Male
Mean 3.83 4.50 4.39 4.11
N 18 18 18 18
Std. Deviation .857 .618 .850 .963
Female
Mean 3.88 4.58 4.46 4.16
N 50 50 50 50
Std. Deviation 1.172 .758 .762 1.057
Total
Mean 3.87 4.56 4.44 4.15
N 68 68 68 68
Std. Deviation 1.091 .720 .780 1.026
Chart 4.19
Inference
From the above table it is inferred that most of the respondents are agree with Edges are teethof cutting, precautionary indication and Safety items, and some of the respondents arestrongly agree with First aid box.
3.4
3.6
3.8
4
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
Male Female Total
Edges are teeth of cutting
First aid box
Precautionary indication
Safety items
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
54/91
54
Table 4.20
Gender vs Ventilation facilities, Artificial humidification and Medical facility
Report
Gender Ventilationfacilities
Artificialhumidification
Medical facility
Male
Mean 4.28 4.28 4.33
N 18 18 18
Std. Deviation 1.018 .895 1.138
Female
Mean 4.12 4.50 4.14
N 50 50 50
Std. Deviation .961 .707 1.010
Total
Mean 4.16 4.44 4.19
N 68 68 68
Std. Deviation .971 .761 1.040
Chart 4.20
Inference
From the above table it is inferred that most of the respondents are agree with Ventilationfacilities, artificial humidification and Medical facility.
3.9
4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
Male Female Total
Ventilation facilities
Artificial humidification
Medical facility
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
55/91
55
Table 4.21
Duration of the periodic medical checkup provided
Duration of the periodic medical checkup provided
Frequency Percent Valid Percent CumulativePercent
Valid
On monthly basis 45 66.2 66.2 66.2
Once in 3 months 8 11.8 11.8 77.9
Once in a year 15 22.1 22.1 100.0
Total 68 100.0 100.0
Chart 4.21
Inference
From the above table it is inferred that 66.2% of the respondents says Duration of theperiodic medical checkup provided on monthly basis and 22.1% respondents says once ayear.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
56/91
56
Table 4.22
Satisfied with the working environment
Satisfied with the working environment
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
Yes 65 95.6 95.6 95.6
No 3 4.4 4.4 100.0
Total 68 100.0 100.0
Chart 4.22
Inference
From the above table it is inferred that 95.6% of the respondents Satisfied with the workingenvironment and 4.4% respondents not Satisfied.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
57/91
57
4.2 STATISTICAL TEST AND INTERPRETATION
TOOL-1
ANOVAAim: To find whether the mean score of Gender are same on Safety committee, Safety and
Health Duties, Tool-box briefings and safety checks
H0: The mean score of Gender are same on Safety committee, Safety and Health Duties,
Tool-box briefings and safety checks
H1: The mean score of Gender are not same on Safety committee, Safety and Health Duties,
Tool-box briefings and safety checks
ANOVA
Model Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.
1
Regression .475 3 .158 .794 .502a
Residual 12.760 64 .199
Total 13.235 67
a. Predictors: (Constant), Safety committee, Safety and Health Duties, Tool-box briefings and
safety checks
b. Dependent Variable: Gender
Calculated value =2.748
Degree of freedom=3, 64
Tabulated value is 0.794 from 5% significance level of f test
Tabulated value < calculated value
Result:
The calculated value is greater than the tabulated value so we reject the null hypothesis. So it
is concluded the Gender are not same on Safety committee, Safety and Health Duties, Tool-
box briefings and safety checks
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
58/91
58
TOOL-2
REGRESSION
Aim: To find whether the model designed with Age and Drinking Water, Facilities for
preparing and eating food, Sufficient and suitable washing facility
HO: The Mean score of Age on Drinking Water, Facilities for preparing and eating food,
Sufficient and suitable washing facility is equal
H1: The Mean score of Age on Drinking Water, Facilities for preparing and eating food,
Sufficient and suitable washing facility is unequal
Model Summary
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate
1 .326a .107 .065 .750
Model Summary
ModelChange Statistics
R Square Change F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change
1 .107 2.544 3 64 .064
a. Predictors: (Constant), Drinking Water, Facilities for preparing and eating food, Sufficient and
suitable washing facility
b. Dependent Variable: Age
ANOVA
Model Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.
1
Regression 4.291 3 1.430 2.544 .064a
Residual 35.988 64 .562
Total 40.279 67
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
59/91
59
ANOVA
Model Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.
1
Regression 4.291 3 1.430 2.544 .064a
Residual 35.988 64 .562
Total 40.279 67
a. Predictors: (Constant), Drinking Water, Facilities for preparing and eating food, Sufficient
and suitable washing facility
b. Dependent Variable: Age
Coefficientsa
ModelStandardized Coefficients
t Sig.
Beta
1
(Constant) 4.339 .000
Facilities for preparing and eating food .056 .437 .663
Sufficient and suitable washing facility -.368 -2.677 .009
Drinking Water .165 1.294 .200
Coefficientsa
ModelUnstandardized Coefficients
B Std. Error
1
(Constant) 2.541 .586
Facilities for preparing and eating food .042 .097
Sufficient and suitable washing facility -.295 .110
Drinking Water .147 .113
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
60/91
60
Coefficientsa
Model
95.0% Confidence Interval for B
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 (Constant) 1.371 3.711
Facilities for preparing and eating food -.151 .236
Sufficient and suitable washing facility -.515 -.075
Drinking Water -.080 .373
a. Dependent Variable: Age
Residuals Statisticsa
Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation N
Predicted Value 1.70 3.11 2.10 .253 68
Std. Predicted Value -1.602 3.966 .000 1.000 68
Standard Error of Predicted Value .105 .411 .164 .079 68
Adjusted Predicted Value 1.57 3.43 2.10 .283 68
Residual -1.918 2.030 .000 .733 68
Std. Residual -2.557 2.708 .000 .977 68
Stud. Residual -2.878 2.747 .000 1.011 68
Deleted Residual -2.428 2.089 .000 .787 68
Stud. Deleted Residual -3.060 2.902 .004 1.040 68
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
61/91
61
Mahal. Distance .334 19.167 2.956 4.512 68
Cook's Distance .000 .551 .020 .070 68
Centered Leverage Value .005 .286 .044 .067 68
a. Dependent Variable: Age
Interpretation:
The adjusted r2 value is 0.107 which means only 10% variation between the variables
ventilation and temperature.
Calculated value =2.748
Degree of freedom=3, 64
Tabulated value is 2.544
Tabulated value
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
62/91
62
TOOLS 3
REGRESSION
Aim: To find whether the model designed with Gender and Smoking is prohibited, Escape
routes in case of fire
HO: The Mean score of Gender on Smoking is prohibited, Escape routes in case of fire is
equal
H1: The Mean score of Gender on Smoking is prohibited, Escape routes in case of fire is
unequal
Model Summaryb
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate
1 .160a .026 -.004 .445
Model Summaryb
ModelChange Statistics
R Square Change F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change
1 .026 .855 2 65 .430
a. Predictors: (Constant), Smoking is prohibited, Escape routes in case of fire
b. Dependent Variable: Gender
ANOVAb
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1Regression .339 2 .170 .855 .430a
Residual 12.896 65 .198
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
63/91
63
Total 13.235 67
a. Predictors: (Constant), Smoking is prohibited, Escape routes in case of fire
b. Dependent Variable: Gender
Coefficientsa
ModelUnstandardized Coefficients
B Std. Error
1
(Constant) 2.098 .438
Escape routes in case of fire -.170 .137
Smoking is prohibited .099 .082
Coefficientsa
ModelStandardized Coefficients
t Sig.Beta
1
(Constant) 4.793 .000
Escape routes in case of fire -.234 -1.239 .220
Smoking is prohibited .229 1.214 .229
Coefficientsa
Model 95.0% Confidence Interval for B
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
64/91
64
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1
(Constant) 1.224 2.972
Escape routes in case of fire -.443 .104
Smoking is probited -.064 .263
a. Dependent Variable: Gender
Residuals Statisticsa
Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation N
Predicted Value 1.45 1.92 1.74 .071 68
Std. Predicted Value -4.027 2.541 .000 1.000 68
Standard Error of Predicted Value .065 .242 .086 .037 68
Adjusted Predicted Value 1.24 1.91 1.73 .087 68
Residual -.817 .551 .000 .439 68
Std. Residual -1.834 1.238 .000 .985 68
Stud. Residual -1.873 1.451 .004 1.008 68
Deleted Residual -.852 .758 .004 .460 68
Stud. Deleted Residual -1.911 1.464 -.003 1.017 68
Mahal. Distance .457 18.836 1.971 3.464 68
Cook's Distance .002 .263 .017 .034 68
Centered Leverage Value .007 .281 .029 .052 68
a. Dependent Variable: Gender
Interpretation:
The adjusted r2 value is 0.026 which means only 2.6% variation between the variablesventilation and temperature.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
65/91
65
Calculated value =0.855
Degree of freedom=2, 65
Tabulated value is 3.138
Tabulated value >calculated value
Result:
The calculated value is less than the tabulated value so we accept the null hypothesis. So it is
concluded The Mean score of Gender on Smoking is prohibited, Escape routes in case of fire
is equal.
TOOLS-4
REGRESSION
Aim: To find whether the model designed with Gender and Material, tools and teeth of
cutting tools, Mechanical power, sitting position.
HO: The Mean score of Gender on Material, tools and teeth of cutting tools, Mechanical
power, sitting position is equal
H1: The Mean score of Gender on Material, tools and teeth of cutting tools, Mechanical
power, sitting position is unequal
Model Summaryb
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
66/91
66
Model Summaryb
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate
1 .114a .013 -.033 .452
Model Summaryb
ModelChange Statistics
R Square Change F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change
1 .013 .279 3 64 .840
a. Predictors: (Constant), Material, tools and teeth of cutting tools, Mechanical power , Sitting
position
b. Dependent Variable: Gender
ANOVAb
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1
Regression .171 3 .057 .279 .840a
Residual 13.064 64 .204
Total 13.235 67
a. Predictors: (Constant), Material, tools and teeth of cutting tools, Mechanical power , Sitting
position
b. Dependent Variable: Gender
Coefficientsa
Model Unstandardized Coefficients
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
67/91
67
B Std. Error
1
(Constant) 1.995 .411
Mechanical power -.067 .091
Sitting position -.025 .048
Material, tools and teeth of cutting tools .034 .054
Coefficientsa
ModelStandardized Coefficients
t Sig.Beta
1
(Constant) 4.852 .000
Mechanical power -.098 -.738 .463
Sitting position -.071 -.527 .600
Material, tools and teeth of cutting tools .091 .632 .530
Coefficientsa
Model95.0% Confidence Interval for B
Lower Bound Upper Bound
1
(Constant) 1.173 2.816
Mechanical power -.248 .114
Sitting position -.121 .071
Material, tools and teeth of cutting tools -.074 .143
a. Dependent Variable: Gender
Residuals Statisticsa
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
68/91
68
Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation N
Predicted Value 1.62 1.85 1.74 .051 68
Std. Predicted Value -2.299 2.245 .000 1.000 68
Standard Error of Predicted Value .070 .237 .104 .034 68
Adjusted Predicted Value 1.55 1.96 1.73 .061 68
Residual -.847 .381 .000 .442 68
Std. Residual -1.874 .843 .000 .977 68
Stud. Residual -2.001 .919 .004 1.004 68
Deleted Residual -.965 .453 .004 .466 68
Stud. Deleted Residual -2.050 .918 -.004 1.013 68
Mahal. Distance .619 17.480 2.956 2.944 68
Cook's Distance .002 .139 .014 .020 68
Centered Leverage Value .009 .261 .044 .044 68
a. Dependent Variable: Gender
Interpretation:
The adjusted r2 value is 0.013 which means only 1.3% variation between the variables
ventilation and temperature.
Calculated value =0.279
Degree of freedom= 3, 64
Tabulated value is 2.748
Tabulated value calculated value
Result:
The calculated value is less than the tabulated value so we accept the null hypothesis. So it is
concluded The Mean score of Gender on Material, tools and teeth of cutting tools,Mechanical power, sitting position is equal.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
69/91
69
TOOLS -5
REGRESSION
Aim: To find whether the model designed with Age and Edges are teeth of cutting, Hammer,
chisels, Hand tools.
HO: The Mean score of Age on Edges are teeth of cutting, Hammer, chisels, Hand tools is
equal
H1: The Mean score of Age on Edges are teeth of cutting, Hammer, chisels, Hand tools is
unequal
Model Summaryb
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate
1 .188a .035 -.010 .779
Model Summaryb
ModelChange Statistics
R Square Change F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change
1 .035 .780 3 64 .510
a. Predictors: (Constant), Edges are teeth of cutting, Hammer, chisels , Hand tools
b. Dependent Variable: Age
ANOVA
Model Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.
1Regression 1.420 3 .473 .780 .510a
Residual 38.859 64 .607
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
70/91
70
Total 40.279 67
a. Predictors: (Constant), Edges are teeth of cutting, Hammer, chisels , Hand tools
b. Dependent Variable: Age
Coefficientsa
ModelUnstandardized Coefficients
B Std. Error
1
(Constant) 2.393 .549
Hand tools .145 .179
Hammer, chisels -.124 .121
Edges are teeth of cutting -.102 .124
Coefficientsa
ModelStandardized Coefficients
t Sig.
Beta
1
(Constant) 4.356 .000
Hand tools .144 .807 .422
Hammer, chisels -.155 -1.023 .310
Edges are teeth of cutting -.144 -.827 .411
Coefficientsa
Model95.0% Confidence Interval for B
Lower Bound Upper Bound
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
71/91
71
1
(Constant) 1.295 3.491
Hand tools -.213 .502
Hammer, chisels -.367 .118
Edges are teeth of cutting -.350 .145
a. Dependent Variable: Age
Residuals Statisticsa
Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation N
Predicted Value 1.84 2.52 2.10 .146 68
Std. Predicted Value -1.821 2.850 .000 1.000 68
Standard Error of Predicted Value .108 .436 .177 .068 68
Adjusted Predicted Value 1.69 2.55 2.10 .168 68
Residual -1.207 2.080 .000 .762 68
Std. Residual -1.549 2.669 .000 .977 68
Stud. Residual -1.690 2.815 .000 1.009 68
Deleted Residual -1.437 2.313 -.001 .812 68
Stud. Deleted Residual -1.716 2.983 .009 1.037 68
Mahal. Distance .301 19.974 2.956 3.504 68
Cook's Distance .000 .222 .017 .038 68
Centered Leverage Value .004 .298 .044 .052 68
a. Dependent Variable: Age
Interpretation:
The adjusted r2 value is 0.035 which means only 3.5% variation between the variables
ventilation and temperature.
Calculated value =0.780
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
72/91
72
Degree of freedom=3, 64
Tabulated value is 2.748
Tabulated value >calculated value
Result:
The calculated value is less than the tabulated value so we accept the null hypothesis. So it is
concluded The Mean score of Age on Edges are teeth of cutting, Hammer, chisels, Hand tools
is equal.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
73/91
73
TOOLS-5
REGRESSION
Aim: To find whether the model designed with Age and Ventilation facilities, First aid box,
Precautionary indication, Safety.
HO: The Mean score of Age on Ventilation facilities, First aid box, Precautionary indication,
Safety is equal
H1: The Mean score of Age on Ventilation facilities, First aid box, Precautionary indication,
Safety is unequal
Model Summaryb
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate
1 .171a .029 -.032 .788
Model Summaryb
ModelChange Statistics
R Square Change F Change df1 df2 Sig. F Change
1 .029 .474 4 63 .755
a. Predictors: (Constant), Ventilation facilities, First aid box, Precautionary indication, Safety
items
b. Dependent Variable: Age
ANOVAb
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 1.176 4 .294 .474 .755a
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
74/91
74
Residual 39.104 63 .621
Total 40.279 67
a. Predictors: (Constant), Ventilation facilities, First aid box, Precautionary indication, Safety
items
b. Dependent Variable: Age
Coefficientsa
ModelUnstandardized Coefficients
B Std. Error
1
(Constant) 2.559 .691
First aid box -.169 .159
Precautionary indication .003 .194
Safety items -.037 .156
Ventilation facilities .109 .131
Coefficientsa
Model
Standardized Coefficients
t Sig.
95.0% Confidence Interval for B
Beta Lower Bound Upper Bound
1
(Constant) 3.701 .000 1.177 3.941
First aid box -.157 -1.062 .292 -.487 .149
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
75/91
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
76/91
76
Result:
The calculated value is less than the tabulated value so we accept the null hypothesis. So it is
concluded The Mean score of Age on Ventilation facilities, First aid box, Precautionary
indication, Safety is equal.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
77/91
77
TOOLS-6
ANOVA
Aim: To find whether the mean score of Age are same on Duration of the periodic medical
checkup provided
H0: The mean score of Age are same on Duration of the periodic medical checkup provided
H1: The mean score of Age are not same on Duration of the periodic medical checkup
provided.
ANOVA
Duration of the periodic medical checkup provided
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 1.553 3 .518 .733 .536
Within Groups 45.212 64 .706
Total 46.765 67
Calculated value = 0.733
Degree of freedom=3, 64
Tabulated value is 2.750 from 5% significance level of f test
Tabulated value >calculated value
Result:
The calculated value is less than the tabulated value so we accept the null hypothesis. So it is
concluded the Age are same on the Satisfied with the working environment.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
78/91
78
TOOLS-7
CHI-SQUARE
Aim: To set the significant difference between Gender with Satisfied with the working
environment
H0: There is no significant difference between Gender and Satisfied with the working
environment.
H1: There is significant difference between Gender and Satisfied with the working
environment.
Crosstab
Gender * Satisfied with the working environment Crosstabulation
Count
Satisfied with the working environment
Total
Yes No
Gender
Male 18 0 18
Female 47 3 50
Total 65 3 68
Chi-Square
Chi-Square Tests
Value DfAsymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.130a 1 .288
Continuity Correctionb .155 1 .694
Likelihood Ratio 1.894 1 .169
Fisher's Exact Test .560 .391
Linear-by-Linear
Association1.113 1 .291
N of Valid Cases 68
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
79/91
79
Chi-Square Tests
Value DfAsymp. Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (2-
sided)
Exact Sig. (1-
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.130a 1 .288
Continuity Correctionb .155 1 .694
Likelihood Ratio 1.894 1 .169
Fisher's Exact Test .560 .391
Linear-by-Linear
Association1.113 1 .291
N of Valid Cases 68
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .79.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Interpretation
The table value of chi-square contribution of % level of significance is lesser than calculated
value. So the Ho is rejected. Thus there is significant association between educational
qualification and Satisfied with the working environment.
Result
Calculated value is 1.130
Degree of freedom is 1
Significance level 5% and Confidence limit 95 %
Tabulated value is 3.84
The table value > the calculated value
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
80/91
80
CHAPTER-V
FINDING, SUGGESTIONS AND CONCLUSION
5.1 FINDINGS
1. Most of the respondents belong to 20th to 23rd age group.2. Most of the respondents are Female.3. Most of the respondents educational qualification is diploma.4. Most of the respondents designation is short term trainee.5. Most of the respondents income level is Rs 3000 to Rs 10000.6. Most of the respondents are single.7. Most of the respondents belongs to 16 to 19 age group are strongly agree with the
safety policy, 20 to 23 age group are strongly agree the safety policy, 24 to 27 age
group are agree the safety policy, 27 above age group are strongly agree the safety
policy.
8. Most of the respondents belongs to 16 to 19 age group are strongly agree theSafety and health recorders,20 to 23 age group are agree the Safety and health
recorders, 24 to 27 age group are agree the Safety and health recorders, 27 above
age group are strongly agree the Safety and health recorders.
9. Most of the respondents belongs to 16 to 19 age group are strongly agree theTraining levels,20 to 23 age group are agree the Training levels, 24 to 27 age group
are strongly agree the Training levels, 27 above age group are strongly agree the
Training levels.
10.Most of the respondents belongs to 16 to 19 age group are strongly agree theSafety and Health Duties,20 to 23 age group are agree the Safety and HealthDuties, 24 to 27 age group are strongly agree the Safety and Health Duties, 27
above age group are strongly agree the Safety and Health Duties.
11.Most of the respondents belongs to 16 to 19 age group are agree the Tool-boxbriefings and safety checks,20 to 23 age group are agree the Tool-box briefings
and safety checks, 24 to 27 age group are agree the Tool-box briefings and safety
checks, 27 above age group are strongly agree the Tool-box briefings and safety
checks.
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
81/91
81
12.Most of the respondents belongs to 16 to 19 age group are strongly agree theSafety committee,20 to 23 age group are agree the Safety committee, 24 to 27 age
group are agree the Safety committee and 27 above age group are agree the Safety
committee.
13.Most of the respondents belongs to 16 to 19 age group are agree the Safety aspectsin site planning and layout, 20 to 23 age group are agree the Safety aspects in site
planning and layout, 24 to 27 age group are agree the Safety aspects in site
planning and layout and 27 above age group are strongly agree the Safety aspects
in site planning and layout.
14.Most of the respondents belongs to 16 to 19 age group are agree the Training,20 to23 age group are agree the Training, 24 to 27 age group are agree the Training and
27 above age group are agree the Training.
15.Most of the respondents belongs to 16 to 19 age group are strongly agree theTraffic control system,20 to 23 age group are agree the Traffic control system, 24
to 27 age group are agree the Traffic control system and 27 above age group are
strongly agree the Traffic control system.16.Most of the respondents belongs to 16 to 19 age group are strongly agree the
Facilities for preparing and eating food, 20 to 23 age group are agree the Facilities
for preparing and eating food, 24 to 27 age group are agree the Facilities for
preparing and eating food and 27 above age group are agree the Facilities for
preparing and eating food.
17.Most of the respondents belongs to 16 to 19 age group are strongly agree theSufficient and suitable washing facility,20 to 23 age group are agree the Sufficient
and suitable washing facility, 24 to 27 age group are agree the Sufficient and
suitable washing facility and 27 above age group are agree the Sufficient and
suitable washing facility.
18.Most of the respondents belongs to 16 to 19 age group are agree the Enoughtraining can be given,20 to 23 age group are agree the Enough training can be
given, 24 to 27 age group are agree the Enough training can be given and 27 above
age group are agree the Enough training can be given.
19.Most of the respondents belongs to 16 to 19 age group are strongly agree theDrinking Water,20 to 23 age group are agree the Drinking Water, 24 to 27 age
-
7/31/2019 Jairaj 111
82/91
82
group are agree the Drinking Water and 27 above age group are strongly agree the
Training.
20.Most of the respondents belongs to 16 to 19 age group are strongly agree theEscape routes in case of fire, 20 to 23 age group are strongly agree the Escape
routes in case of fire, 24 to 27 age group are strongly agree the Escape routes in
case of fire and 27 above age group are