IWMW 2001: Web Site Redevelopment (2)

Making it happenA6 - Web Site Redevelopment

IWMW 2001: Organising Chaos

Implementation

[email protected] : 26/06/2001(c) 2001, The University of Kent at Canterbury

Kent’s caseStructure and content from in-house

Design and template preparation by consultants

So - how to find the right outside company?


CriteriaVaried portfoliosExperience with public sector companiesWell-presented corporate sitesStructural designInterface designGraphic design


First round30 companies chosen from

– Yahoo.co.uk - UK Web Design houses– New Media Age– Internet Magazine– Other Websites– Other design magazines– word of mouth


First round (cont.) and inviteSmall group of publications team and

designers whittled down and chose 9 companies with a reserve list of 7

9 companies invited to tender– brief– covering letter– publications pack– suggested timeline to be followed if successful


The brief - important bitsWhy Kent needed a new siteWho the site was forWhat resources were available to maintain itWhat technological aspirations were there

(standards, browser compliance, speed)Corporate style and publications packHave a contract - with penalty clauses


Second round5 companies accepted and tendered 13

designs in all45 staff and students invited to come and

see - carefully chosenEvaluation / ratings forms filled in by each3 companies invited to interview - 2

companies very popular and a third added due to popularity amongst design staff


Third (and final) roundThree companies invited to present their

designs to selection panel of 8– Senior management (including VC)– Web committee reps– Director of C&DO and Web Editor– University designer– Students’ Union


The projectKeymedia chosenInitial meeting on-site with successful

companyCommunication via email and phone

through design stages and then codingEach stage involved a “signing-off” process


StaffingKeymedia

– Project manager - liaison role– Designer - initial stages until design signed off– Coder - later stages until end of project– Design and technical managers - checks

In-house– Web Editor - 1 fte– Support - .8 fte < 2.3 fte for final fortnight– University designer - checks


ContentRe-organisation of current content - lengthy

but possible– maintenance issues solved by pigging-backing

on paper publications schedulesNew content - tricky and time consuming

– Who provides this and how often?– Will they meet your deadlines for the re-design?– Can your Web team do it all? Should they?


ChallengesDesigners need to know limitations of Web

as well as opportunitiesCoders need to have read the brief or at

least been told about itCoders (ideally) should be as good or better

than your in-house onesProject manager needs to know their

colleagues and be aware of all issues


Costs25k server on special offer (Sun Ultra 450 -

lots of memory and big disks)£500 to each company who tenderedEstimates of 8-18k for same briefTell them what you have and they will spend

it - is this a good idea?Razorfish - no marketing, no need - average

client 100k+ - :-(


Milestones Structure finished Design drafts 1 + 2 Final designs Coding of a page 1 Templates drafts 1 + 2 Final Templates Content written Scripts installed and

tested on server

Validation and accessibility checks done

Templates and content merged

User testing Be prepared to go

back to an earlier stage


ConsultationStrategy - managementStructure - users (as far as possible),

management and peersInterface and graphic design - usability

literature, accessibility guidelines and user testing

Management and maintenance


Those involved ...Content writersHTML codersInformation managersGraphic designers / MultimediaServer maintainers - script installersStats producers


Low maintenance optionsPDFsStatic pages for static contentDatabases for retrieval and collectionSSIs - Server Side IncludesStylesheetsDreamweaver templates and Library itemsExcellent search and replace tools


How not to waste time and effort Use tools that save time Make sure that all pages have a purpose Check they meet that purpose Do not tie your Web site to any particular

technology Try not to duplicate the page length, writing style

and graphic design of paper documents - change your content to fit the medium

Prioritise your activities to fit those of University


High maintenance optionsRegularly changing structureHigh graphics intensity for text and fontsTemplates that cannot be changed globally

once appliedStatic pages for regularly changing contentNo search and replace toolsText editor page editing

IWMW 2001: Web Site Redevelopment (2)

Education

Transcript of IWMW 2001: Web Site Redevelopment (2)