IUID Metrics

60
1 IUID Scorecard 3 April 2008 Depicting Implementation Depicting Implementation Status Updates Status Updates in the DoD Components in the DoD Components

Transcript of IUID Metrics

Page 1: IUID Metrics

1

IUID Scorecard3 April 2008

Depicting Implementation Depicting Implementation Status UpdatesStatus Updates

in the DoD Componentsin the DoD Components

Page 2: IUID Metrics

2

DOD Program Management Scorecard

Page 3: IUID Metrics

3

IUID Program Growth Trends(Total Expected UII Population = 97M from Current Population = 2.3M)

(From 60 of 300 Contractors Expected)

Note: IUID GFP Interim Rule – Publication September 13, 2007 requires GFP Registration using IUID Registry

Page 4: IUID Metrics

4

IUID Program Growth Trends(Total Expected UII Population = 97M from Current Population = 2.9M)

UIIs in Registry (New Items)

-

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

Tota

l

Air ForceNavyArmy Marine CorpsODAsDLA

New UII Growth by Contracting Component as of 3 April 2008

New UII Contracts – Growth by Component as of 3 April 2008

GFP UIIs Registered by DoD ComponentsLegacy UIIs Registered by DoD Components

As of 18 March 2008 As of 12 March 2008

796,487 Legacy Items Registered

0%0%

74%

17%

9%

Army Navy Air Force Defence Agencies Contractor EID used

230,140 GFP Items Registered

0%

56%

11%

13%

20%

Army Navy Marine Corps Air Force Defense Agencies

Contracts in Registry

-

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

2,000

Tota

l

Air ForceNavyArmy Marine CorpsODAsDLA

Page 5: IUID Metrics

5

Program Manager PlansACAT 1D

ACAT 1D IUID Program Plan Status as of 3 April 2008

Service Branch

Total Program Plans

Total Complete Percent Complete

AIR FORCE TOTAL 14 14 100%

ARMY TOTAL 10 10* 100%

NAVY/USMC TOTAL 20 20 100%

USSOCOM TOTAL 0 N/A N/A

Dept of Defense

3 3 100%

Joint Ordnance Command

Group

1 1 100%

Missile Defense Agency

6 6 100%

Chem DeMil Agency 3 3 100%

TOTALS 57 57 100%

ACAT 1D IUID Program Plan Status as of 19 Dec 2007

Service Branch

Total Program Plans

Total Complete Percent Complete

AIR FORCE TOTAL 14 14 100%

ARMY TOTAL 9 9 100%

NAVY/USMC TOTAL 20 20 100%

USSOCOM TOTAL 0 N/A N/A

Dept of Defense

3 2* 66%

Joint Ordnance Command

Group

1 1 100%

Missile Defense Agency

6 6 100%

Chem DeMil Agency 3 3 100%

TOTALS 56 55 98%

* Joint Cargo Aircraft (JCA) plan approved by PEO and in staffing to USD(AT&L)

Page 6: IUID Metrics

6

Program Manager PlansNon ACAT 1D

Non ACAT 1D IUID Program Plan Status as of 3 April 2008

Service Branch

Total Program

PlansTotal

CompletePercent

Complete

AIR FORCE TOTAL

108 95 88%

ARMY TOTAL

351 351 100%

NAVY/USMC TOTAL

257 240 93%

USSOCOM TOTAL

80 74 93%

TOTALS793 760 96%

*PEO STRI plan estimated approval by 31 Jan 08

Non ACAT 1D IUID Program Plan Status as of 19 Dec 2007

Service Branch

Total Program

PlansTotal

CompletePercent

Complete

AIR FORCE TOTAL

108 89 82%

ARMY TOTAL

351 350* 99.7%

NAVY/USMC TOTAL

258 249 97%

USSOCOM TOTAL

71 71 100%

TOTALS788 759 96%

Page 7: IUID Metrics

7

DOD Military Equipment Valuation Scorecard

Page 8: IUID Metrics

8

* RECONCILED to CAMS-ME: IUID Military Equipment Programs established in the IUID Registry with 100% of the items associated with that program reconciled to CAMS-ME.

** Air Force programs are reported as 100% loaded in IUID Registry; Reconciliation = N/A as AF reports their ME in REMIS (vice CAMS-ME)

NOTE:

• ChemBio IUID loads are reflected in the respective Service’s numbers

Total ME Established in the IUID RegistryAs-of: 03/17/08

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Service

% o

f ME

Load

ed

% Remaining

% of Total ME Loaded

% Complete (Fully Reconciled*)

Component Total # of ME Programs to

be Registered

Army 192

Navy (DON) 131

USMC (DON) 68

Air Force 79

SOCOM 18

MDA 5

Page 9: IUID Metrics

9

DoD Contract Compliance Scorecard

Page 10: IUID Metrics

10

DoD Capstone DoDAAC BenchmarkDoD Capstone DoDAAC Benchmark(IUID Procurement Policy Deployment)(IUID Procurement Policy Deployment)

As Of – Mar 11, 2008

Note: Percentage figure is the % of DoDAACs with UII Contracts 03/11/08 to FY07 Active DoDAACs.

Contracts = 1,831UIIs = 486,820

Contracts = 1,190UIIs = 1,238,330

Contracts = 310UIIs = 12,507

Contracts = 1,210UIIs = 155,888

Contracts = 166UIIs = 123,126

Contracts = 104UIIs = 45,710

• Total Number of DoD DoDAACs with Supply Contracts in FY07= 750• Total Number DoDAACs with UII Contracts = 343 (46%)• Total Number of Contracts = 4,811• Total Number of UIIs = 2,063,001

Page 11: IUID Metrics

11

Defense Logistics AgencyIUID Scorecards

Page 12: IUID Metrics

12

DLA IUID Accomplishments

• The IUID Registry continues to be updated with DLA managed items – Increases of UIIs (18%), Contracts (23%), and

DODAACs (86%) being added to the registry in the last quarter

Page 13: IUID Metrics

13

DLA IUID Accomplishments (cont.)

• IUID technical requirements are beginning to be received from the Air Force Engineering Support Activities– At present, this is a very small population and is only

received when DLA requests assistance on other technical issues during the procurement process

– Further coordination between DLA and the AF may identify other items that have IUID technical requirements available

Page 14: IUID Metrics

14

• DLA will continue to implement contractual requirements as items are identified– DLA will include DFARS IUID Clause on contracts

where IUID technical requirements have been established

– Develop standard process to address procurement issues (ECD Jun 08)*

• Price increases• Delivery impact• Engineering review

* ECD Feb 08 not met due to coordination effort taking longer then previously anticipated

DLA IUID Implementation

Page 15: IUID Metrics

15

DLA IUID Implementation (cont.)

• Service/DLA Working Group continues to identify items for IUID marking– Serialized Managed (Listing from Services to DLA - ECD

TBD)*– Mission Essential (Weapon System Essentiality Code

(WSEC) – DLA action item, ECD Apr 08)**– Controlled Inventory (Controlled Item Identifier Code

(CIIC) - DLA action item, ECD Apr 08)**

* See Issues/Challenges** Original ECD of Jan 08 was not met due to workload prioritization. Data pulls have

been accomplished but analysis and inclusion in policy is ongoing.

Page 16: IUID Metrics

16

Defense Logistics Agency Issues/Challenges

Page 17: IUID Metrics

17

DLA IUID Issues/Challenges

• Serialized Managed Items– There appears to be no agreed upon definition

of a serialized managed item– Each Service has a serialized managed

program but none of these programs include all serialized items in their inventory

Page 18: IUID Metrics

18

DLA IUID Issues/Challenges

• Engineering review– Method and placement of marking

• Direct part – mostly consumables (extensive engineering effort)

• Data plate – applicable to DLR, FLR, End Items, Assemblies, and Sub-assemblies

– May be accomplished prior to acquisition (preferred)• Service update technical data with IUID prior to acquisition

– May be required prior to acquisition (exception)• Service update technical data with IUID during acquisition

(Engineering Support Activity Request Process)– Additional cost– Additional lead time

Page 19: IUID Metrics

US Special Operations CommandUS Special Operations Command

The overall classification of this briefing is: OVERALL SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF BRIEFINGDerived From: ________________

Declassify On: ________________19

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF SLIDESECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF SLIDE

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF SLIDESECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF SLIDE

USSOCOM UID PROGRAM USSOCOM UID PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS REPORTREPORT

Presented by: Ms. Lorie VancePresented by: Ms. Lorie VanceUSSOCOM/SOAL-MUSSOCOM/SOAL-M

Date: 3 April 08Date: 3 April 08

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFED

UNCLASSIFED

Page 20: IUID Metrics

USSOCOMUSSOCOM 20 UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIEDNON-ACAT 1D IUID PROGRAM PLAN NON-ACAT 1D IUID PROGRAM PLAN STATUS STATUS

AS OF 4 MAR 2008AS OF 4 MAR 2008

Currently: 80 Separate IUID implementation plans covering 145 acquisition programs

Service BranchTotal Program

Plans Total Complete Percent Complete

USSOCOM TOTAL80 74 93%

19 Dec 08

Service BranchTotal Program

Plans Total Complete Percent Complete

USSOCOM TOTAL 71 71 100%

Page 21: IUID Metrics

USSOCOMUSSOCOM 21 UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED

USSOCOM REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTSUSSOCOM REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTSSUPPORTING IUIDSUPPORTING IUID

19 Dec 08 Briefing Developed USSOCOM UID Implementation

Plan (Sept 05) Developed USSOCOM UID Collaboration Site

and established a central library of all AT&L Policy Memorandum, DoD Guidance, and other related program documentation

Updated USSOCOM Acquisition Directive 70-1 with UID compliance requirement and criteria. (Jun 06)

Updated USSOCOM Single Acquisition Management Plan (SAMP) Template to include development of specific acquisition program IUID implementation plans

Drafted separate USSOCOM IUID Directive. In final coordination with USSOCOM Chief of Staff. (Dec 07)

Developed separate draft policy (alternative means) for Special Mission Units (SMU) to comply with IUID program requirements.

Updated Special Operations Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (SOFARS) and Desktop Contracting Guide (DCG) with UID compliance requirement and criteria.

UPDATES

USSOCOM IUID Directive 70-2 signed by USSOCOM Chief of Staff

SOAE, Dr. Uhler signed out “Alternative Means” request letter, Sent to AT&L SAPCO for coordination

Conducted DAU IUID Workshop 27 March 08

160th demonstrated the Digitally Integrated Maintenance Environment (DIME) and various user defined UID modules to the Army G-4

160th received approval Aviation Engineering Directorate (AED) to mark 250 aircraft parts

Page 22: IUID Metrics

USSOCOMUSSOCOM 22 UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED

USSOCOM BUSINESS PRACTICES USSOCOM BUSINESS PRACTICES SUPPORTING IUIDSUPPORTING IUID

Established UID Marking and Registration facility at Special Operations Forces Support Activity (SOFSA), Lexington, KY

Established the USSOCOM UID Working Group

Developed USSOCOM IUID approach and procedures in alignment with the acquisition process

Developed USSOCOM IUID Management Information Database

Developed and published USSOCOM IUID Newsletter

Developed and provided IUID acquisition program manager training

Page 23: IUID Metrics

USSOCOMUSSOCOM 23 UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED

USSOCOM IUID PROGRAM PLAN USSOCOM IUID PROGRAM PLAN RESOURCINGRESOURCING

Current as of Mar 08

USSOCOMPEO – Fixed Wing

USSOCOMPEO – Rotary

Wing

USSOCOMPEO – SOF

Worrier

USSOCOMPEO – Intelligence & Information Systems

USSOCOMPEO – Naval

Systems

USSOCOMPEO – Special

Programs

Description

Gunship, Combat Talon, Combat Shadow, EC-130J Commando Solo, UAV System

Chinook, Little Bird, Blackhawk, Platform MOD Programs, A160T Hummingbird, R22 Maverick

Weapons, Survival Equipment, Ground Mobility Vehicles

Communications Systems, C4 Systems, Psych Ops Broadcast System

Patrol Boat, RIB, Seal Delivery System, Riverine, UBA

Classified Systems

# of IUID Program Plans 7 8 12 25 15 13

% Of Plans For Which Resources Were Identified

75% 100% 55% 67% 27% 100%

% Of Plans Funded

0% PM-JAITFUNDED

0% 4% 6% 100%

Requirement(mil)

$5.3 $0.0 $4.0 $1.4 $.5 $0.00

USSOCOM IUID Program Funding Summary:Established SOFSA IUID Marking Facility and Subject Matter Expert: $450KEstablished Special Mission Unit IUID Marking Capability: $582K

Page 24: IUID Metrics

USSOCOMUSSOCOM 24 UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED

% USSOCOM ACQUISITION PROGRAM IUID % USSOCOM ACQUISITION PROGRAM IUID FULLY COMPLIANTFULLY COMPLIANT

IUID Implementation Plan on file

Contracts reflect IUID DFARS Clause

Funding provided

All legacy assets marked and registered

Total Program Plans: 80

Programs Fully IUID Compliant: 15

% Acquisition Programs IUID Compliant: 19%

USSOCOM DEFINITION - FULL UID COMPLIANCE

As of: 5 Mar 08

Page 25: IUID Metrics

USSOCOMUSSOCOM 25 UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED

USSOCOM UII Registration Progress ReportUSSOCOM UII Registration Progress Report

ASSET POPULATION/REGISTRATION RATIO

0.00%

25.00%

50.00%

75.00%

100.00%

Planned 25.00% 50.00% 75.00% 100.00%

Actual 22.52%

# Total UID Assets 131,877

# UID Assets Registered 29,705

CY07 CY08 CY09 CY10

19 Dec 08 Brief: Total Population 130,241, Total Assets Registered 29,678, Ratio: 22.79%

Page 26: IUID Metrics

USSOCOMUSSOCOM 26 UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED

USSOCOM IUID IMPLEMENTATIONUSSOCOM IUID IMPLEMENTATION“WAY-AHEAD” (JAN - JUN 08)“WAY-AHEAD” (JAN - JUN 08)

Identify and coordinate with PMs on MEV/IUID related acquisition programs, acquire needed funding (UFR) and initiate marking and registration of assets Identify and coordinate with PMs on DoD Serially Managed Assets related acquisition programs, acquire needed funding (UFR) and initiate marking and registration of assets Develop IUID Database functionality Complete and publish USSOCOM IUID Process

APRIL SEPTAUGJULYJUNEMAY

Transfer IUD Program Management SOAL-J4 to SOAL-MService Component UID Support plansHold DAU IUID training (27 Mar 08) Coordinate with SOAL-K and ensure all IUID applicable contracts reflects the IUID DFARS Clause (New Acquisition and legacy contracts)USSOCOM develop IG checklists for UID compliance Charter a USSOCOM AIS/AIT Working Group to develop capability to capture and utilize the Unique Item Identifier (UII)

Page 27: IUID Metrics

USSOCOMUSSOCOM 27 UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED

USSOCOM UID ISSUES/CHALLENGESUSSOCOM UID ISSUES/CHALLENGES

O&M funding for marking and registration of Legacy Assets Lack of funding impedes progress to achieving USSOCOM IUID goals

New procurement funding should includes IUID costs Break out of UID costs not always completed

USSOCOM owns no AIS/ AIT systems’ Relies on Services to modify supporting AIT/AIS to capture IUID data

Page 28: IUID Metrics

USSOCOMUSSOCOM 28 UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIEDUNCLASSIFIED

USSOCOM SUCCESS STORY: USSOCOM SUCCESS STORY: TAPO-IUID PROGRAMTAPO-IUID PROGRAM

IUID program consists of: MH-47 Program, MH-60 Program, A/MH-6 Mission Equipment

Approach Leverage on-going efforts to maximize benefits to users

- Aviation Missile Research Engineering Directorate project supported by PM J-AIT Utilize proven methods to avoid costs in marking legacy systems Show value early with pilots/use case - Aviation Life Support Equipment /organizational Clothing and Initial Equipment /Tool

Room/Inventory - AIT insertion into current Maintenance Management System

Enablers Air Worthiness Release approval process Received “blanket approval” to mark components

– Based on form, fit, function of like components result in reduced costs and schedule for some engineering analysis

Results Improved Supply Chain Management, total asset visibility/operational readiness rates, level of

data accuracy Reduced in administrative time, improvement in data accuracy, improvement in soldier

performance

Page 29: IUID Metrics

29

DoN UpdateIUID Scorecard

3 April 2008RDML Sean CreanDASN (A&LM)

Page 30: IUID Metrics

30

Sampled Contracts Requiring UII vs. Sampled Contracts w/ UII

0102030405060708090

100

NAVYMSC

NAVSUP/FISC

NAVICP

NAVSEA

NAVAIR

NAVFACONR

NRL

SPAWAR

SSP

USMC HQ

MARCORSYSCOM

Contracts Requiring UII

Contracts w / UII

DoN Audit of Contract Compliance

Sampled Contracts Requiring UII vs. Sampled Contracts w/ UII

0102030405060708090

100

NAVYMSC

NAVSUP/FISC

NAVICP

NAVSEA

NAVAIR

NAVFACONR

NRL

SPAWAR

SSP

USMC HQ

MARCORSYSCOM

Contracts Requiring UII

Contracts w / UII

DEC 07 MAR 08Compliance

= 72%Compliance

= 80%

Random sampling 100 contracts per HCA Awarded previous quarter

Bottom Line Contract Compliance Improving … Up 8%

Page 31: IUID Metrics

31

How Do We Get There

DoN Life Cycle Item Identification WIPT– Chaired by DASN (A&LM)– Charter defining roles and

responsibilities– Membership: NAVAIR, NAVSEA,

NAVSUP, SPAWAR, USMC I&L, MARCORSYSCOM, COMFISC, NAVFAC

• Ad Hoc members as required– DoN policy, guidance, instruction

development• Additional memo from DASN

(ALM) reinforcing compliance to include DFARs clause

– Synchronize USN and USMC efforts– Track implementation progress via

meaningful, measurable, collectible metrics

– Identify challenges & issues early– Leverage lessons learned across

the Enterprise– Ensure ERP/GCSS-MC solutions

meet FY2010 UID requirements

Charter approved 4 sub-groups established

– Metrics– Process Mapping– Technical Solutions– Communication Plan

DRAFT SECNAV IUID Instruction in informal coordination/staffing

Added OPNAV and MSC to team

Collaborating with Coast Guard

DEC 07 MAR 08

Bottom Line DoN Institutionalizing IUID Processes

Page 32: IUID Metrics

32

Business Process Improvements

Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA)– DoN ILA Handbook updated Sep 06 to

include IUID plan/strategy review as part of the Automated Information Technology (AIT) Assessment

• Reviews are conducted IAW Program’s Acquisition Milestone schedule

Partnering with DLA to establish business process for Class IX

Develop IUID enabled Service-wide Serialized Item Management (SIM) Plan

USMC Enterprise IUID Implementation and Oversight Working Group

15.0 Automated Information Technology (AIT) Milestones

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA B C FRP

IOC

FOC

15.1 RFID Program plan and strategy have been developed/updated consistent with DoD and DoN policy and guidance including:ADUSD(SCI) Memo, Subj: RFID Policy of 30 Jul 04N413T/5U899623 Memo, Subj: Navy RFID Implementation Plan Update of 8 Dec 05

X X X X X

15.2 RFID DFARs clauses added to all solicitations and contracts as appropriate:Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Clause 252.211-7006 RFIDDefense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS); RFID Interim Addendum (DFARS Case 2006-D002)

X X X X X

15.3 Program Unique RFID requirements are adequately addressed in the program’s ILSP, LRFS, Facilities Management Plan, ULSS, PBL, PHS&T and Maintenance Plans. X X X X X

15.4 RFID Implementation and Compliance Metrics identified and tracked. X X X X X

15.5 UID Program plan and strategy have been developed/updated consistent with DoD and DoN policy and guidance including:DASN(L) Memo, Subj: Policy for UID of Tangible Personal Property Legacy Items in Inventory and Operation Use including GFP of 17 May 05

X X X X X

15.6 UID DFARs clauses added to all solicitations and contracts as appropriate,Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Clause 252.211-7003 Item Identification Evaluation

X X X X X

15.7 Program Unique UID requirements are adequately addressed in the programs ILSP, LRFS, Facilities Management Plan, ULSS, PBL, PHS&T and Maintenance Plans. X X X X X

15.8 UID Implementation and Compliance Metrics identified and tracked. X X X X X New DoN Acquisition Review Process known as “Two Pass/Six-Gate” process or more simply “Gate Review”

DEC 07 MAR 08

DON RequirementsAcquisition

PASS 1 PASS 2OSD/JOINTLEVEL

JROCMS A**JROCAnnua

lCSB

2 4 6NAVY/USMC LEVEL

ICDApprov

al

Alternative

Selection

SDSApprov

al

RFPApprov

al

CBA

Contract

Award

Forum*:Lead Org:Chair:

R3BOPNAV/HQMC

CNO/CMC

R3BOPNAV/HQMC

CNO (N8)/DC, CD&I

R3BOPNAV/HQMC

CNO/CMC

R3BASN(RD&A)ASN(RD&A)

R3BASN(RD&A)ASN(RD&A)

PEO/SYSCOM/ OPNAV/HQMCLEVEL InitiaI

SDSIBR

#Gate Review

1

AOA

CONOPSCDD

3

* Substitute Marine Corps equivalent when appropriate

** DON CIO pre-certification, Investment Review Board certification, and Defense Business System (DBS) Management Committee approval prior to obligation of funding for a DBS program when cost $ 1 million

CDD and CONOPSApproval

RFP

R3BASN(RD&A)ASN(RD&A)

SDDSSAC

Last Update: 9 JAN 08

MS B**

5

UpdatedSDS

CD

Bottom Line New Gate Review Process = Promising Reform

Page 33: IUID Metrics

33

Automation

SPS– Embeds DFARs Clause automatically

inserted in solicitation when appropriate

– Review underway for pre-2004 contracts

WAWF– Invoices with UII are submitted and

accepted through WAWF for Navy– With implementation of Navy ERP to

provide notable enhancements.– New ECP is currently being

investigated to support ELINS in WAWF Receiving Reports and Navy ERP to capture UID data below the CLIN level

SPS: The Navy SPS Integrity Tool Working Group has defined the standard Navy Enterprise Edits to include UII clause logic and subsequent error warnings as a proactive pre-award measure within the 1102 community

• Navy-wide rollout by April 2008

DEC 07 MAR 08

Bottom Line SPS Enhancements Underway

Page 34: IUID Metrics

34

Compliance Awareness

DAU CLC 033 Conduct Journeyman’s course Include in semi-annual APML training Establish web-based training on Contract

Knowledge website Add DFARS Clause to Contracting Officer’s

checklist Post electronic messages via “Knowledge

Management Highlights” Send periodic “reminder” emails Weekly “Brown Bag” lunches

Participate/discuss in various forums– USMC Contracting Leadership Conf– NAVSEA Contract Policy Newsletter– NAVSEA Business Process Council– Participate in OSD Sponsored Boot Camps– Participate in OSD Maintenance Symposium– NAVSUP AIT Steering Group

New Initiatives• Incorporate IUID reviews in

Procurement Performance Management Assessment Program (PPMAP) process

• Navy will implement ACBIS for NAVSUP and NAVSEA in FY 08; then develop timeline for further Navy deployment in FY 09

DEC 07 MAR 08Many

initiatives to promote

awareness

Bottom Line Continuously Promoting IUID Awareness

Page 35: IUID Metrics

35

UII Registration Progress Report

0102030405060708090100

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

FY09

FY10

FY11

FY12

FY13

FY14

FY15

FY16

FY17

FY18

FY19

FY20

FY21

Perc

ent

Planned Actual

DoN-wide Totals

Bottom Line Status Unchanged Since Last Update

Page 36: IUID Metrics

36

Depot IUID Readiness

Location 1 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 2F 2G 2H 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 5 6Fleet Readiness Center (FRC) HQ Patuxent River FRC (NADEP) Cherry PointFRC (NADEP) JacksonvilleFRC (NADEP) North IslandFRC Support Equipment (CSE/PSE/Plant)Maintenance Center Albany, GAMaintenance Center Barstow, CA

Not Applicabel

Phase I Phase II Phase III

Haven't Initiatied 0 - 1/3 Complete 1/3 - 2/3 Complete 2/3 or more Complete Complete

Bottom Line Enhancing Depot Capability Continues

ACA ITEC4
For this chart perhaps a full chart would be better unless there have been no changes since December.v/r charlie
Page 37: IUID Metrics

37

Success Story

Bottom Line IUID Tracking Equip Through Maintenance Cycle

• MFOM 2.0 implemented a pilot project integrating IUID technology in FY07– Used MRAS shipboard database – Focused on USS FORREST SHERMAN (DDG-98)– Items targeted had maintenance performed on them during the course of the test period

• Major components involved in the pilot were; – Determining the plan/procedure for uniquely identifying shipboard equipment and assets– Application of IUID technology to label legacy equipment and register IUID numbers in the

DoD IUID National registry • IUID was added as a field in MRAS / MFOM to track equipment through the maintenance cycle

– IUID data successfully batch uploaded to IUID National Registry for items marked during the Pilot Program

Next Step …• Large Scale Fleet Demonstration for additional Ship Classes in FY08 using RTOC funding

– CVN, LHA, LHD, LPD, LSD, CG, DDG, FFG, MCM, SSN (688), SSN (774), and SSGN

Acronyms:USFF: United States Fleet Forces

MFOM: Maintenance Figure of MeritMRAS: Material Readiness Assessment System

USFF– MFOM - IUID ProgramUSFF– MFOM - IUID Program

Page 38: IUID Metrics

38

USMC Enterprise Legacy IUID Campaign Success Story

• HQMC committed funds to accelerate IUID implementation– Primarily focused on readiness reportable items– Total items to be marked and registered estimated in excess of 1M

• 130k end items, plus embedded reparable systems and subsystems– Includes Technical/Engineering Analysis for PM approval– Residual regional marking capability remain in place as a sustainment capability

• Mobile marking devices• Field technical instructions for each marked item

• Schedule is synchronized with GCSS-MC fielding– Capture end item and embedded UII in GCSS-MC install base

• USMC IUID integration “beyond compliance” in policy, processes, AIS in development through HQMC, MARCORSYSCOM and LOGCOM working group

– Serialized Item Management related data collection and attribution through GCSS-MC, Embedded Platform Logistics System (Sensors)

– Data requirements defined to support Performance Measurement Plan, Condition Based Maintenance, and TLCM Predictive Modeling driven Decision Support Tools

Bottom Line IUID Implementation Accelerated … 1M items

Page 39: IUID Metrics

39

DoN Issues/Challenges

• Progress Varies Across DoN– DoN Life Cycle Item Identification WIPT working to develop an enterprise

strategy, consistent business rules/processes, and communication plan

• Technical Data/Engineering Analysis– Determine impact to Form/Fit/Function of Safety of Flight and Critical

Subcomponents prior to physical marking• Schedule

– Immediately identify/mark “low hanging fruit”– Develop post production marking capability for legacy equipment– Identify opportunities to mark legacy equipment at times/locations other than

during depot maintenance– Develop strategy/timeline to mark items with long maintenance cycle

• Resources– Funding will continue to be a challenge until POM process catches up– Minimize man-hours required by automating, where feasible, and developing

smart processes/practices

Bottom Line Status Unchanged Since Last Update

Page 40: IUID Metrics

40

Air Force IUID Scorecard

Update

Headquarters U. S. Air ForceI n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n

c e

Page 41: IUID Metrics

41

Air Force Requirements Documents Supporting IUID

December 19, 2007• AF Policy memorandums

– 9 Apr 03: established lead command for Serial Number Tracking and Product Marking

– 10 Sep 03: reiterated OUSD(AT&L) guidance making UID mandatory on contracts after 1 Jan 04, established lead command for UID contractual implementation strategy

– 7 Feb 05: reiterated OUSD(AT&L) milestones for UID plans and requested OPRs be designated for all program offices

– 27 Oct 05: required ACAT IC and below programs to submit UID plans

• AF Publications– Revised AF Policy Directive and AF

Instruction on Acquisition and Sustainment Life Cycle Management will incorporate UID and SIM requirements

• AF Concept Documents – Serial Number Tracking and Product Marking

plan dated October 2002 established AF strategy for implementing SNT with marking based on use of ECC 200 data matrix

– SNT/IUID Project Plan updated as of Sep 2007

– AF Automated Identification Technology Strategic Plan in coordination

April 3, 2008 Updates• AF Policy memorandums

– No new memorandums on IUID• AF Publications

– Revised AF Policy Directive (AFPD 63-1) in final coordination for publication

– Revised AF Instruction (AFI 63-101) in Technical/Functional coordination

– Drafted AF Pamphlet and Implementation Plan template to provide detailed guidance to Programs

• AF Concept Documents– AF AIT Strategic Plan, in 3 level

coordination– AF AIT AV-1 in coordination– AF Serialized Item Management

(SIM) plan in coordination

Page 42: IUID Metrics

42

Air Force Business Practices Supporting IUID

December 19, 2007• Serial Number Tracking Business Case

Analysis, dated 10 Feb 04– Identified potential benefits of implementing

SNT at an enterprise level • AFMC Initial Operating Capability Plan of

Actions & Milestones, dated 15 Jul 05– Described AF activity to generate an initial

organic parts-marking capability• Warranty Tracking and Reliability Pathfinders

– Outgrowths of SNT BCA to validate potential benefits of implementing enterprise-wide SNT

– Reliability pathfinder focuses on improvements to component reliability to increase aircraft availability and reduce costs

– Warranty tracking pathfinder focuses on developing means to track component warranties to reduce costs by using warranties

• Methods and Procedures Technical Order– Will standardize and globalize processes and

procedures for executing organic part marking– Eliminates redundancy of content in AF

technical orders concerning part marking activities

April 3, 2008 Updates• Warranty pathfinder

– Warranty portal operational

• Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS) Pilot Project– Printer Service Bureau

(PSB) contract pending award

– Pilot kickoff June 08

Page 43: IUID Metrics

4343

IUID Program Plan ResourcingDecember 19, 2007

PEO AC

PEO C2&CS

PEO WS

PEO SP

% Of Plans For Which Resources Were Identified 1

85% 100% 90% 100%

% Of Plans Funded 2 45% 80% 90% 3%

Notes:1) Estimate of initial plans that included budget estimates2) Estimate of initial plans that identified full or partial funding

March 19, 2008

PEO AC

PEO C2&CS

PEO WS

PEO SP

% Of Plans For Which Resources Were Identified 1

85% 100% 90% 100%

% Of Plans Funded 2 45% 80% 90% 50%

Page 44: IUID Metrics

44

UII Registration Progress Report Air Force wide Totals

0102030405060708090100

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

FY09

FY10

FY11

FY12

FY13

FY14

FY15

FY16

FY17

FY18

FY19

FY20

FY21

Perc

ent

Planned Actual

December 19, 2007 April 3, 2008

0102030405060708090100

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

FY09

FY10

FY11

FY12

FY13

FY14

FY15

FY16

FY17

FY18

FY19

FY20

FY21

Perc

ent

Planned Actual

No change

Page 45: IUID Metrics

45

4 4

0 0 0 0 0 00

1

2

3

4

5

1QFY08 2QFY08 3QFY08 4QFY08

Orders Compliant

Number ofModification OrdersAwarded

Number w/ Clausein Basic/Order

AF Contracting Compliance with IUIDFY08

58

40

0 0 0 0 0 00

10

20

30

40

50

60

1QFY08 2QFY08 3QFY08 4QFY08

Contracts Compliant

Number of (C andD-type) ContractsAwarded

Number ContainingUID Clause

69% 100%

Awards, modifications, and orders for supplies meeting IUID threshold of Unit Price >= $5K

Page 46: IUID Metrics

46

Air Force Depot IUID Readiness by OSD Defined Phase

Location 1 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 2F 2G 2H 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 5 6OC-ALCOO-ALCWR-ALC

0-1/3 completeHaven't Initiated

Phase IIPhase I Phase III

Complete2/3 or more complete1/3-2/3 complete

Location 1 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 2F 2G 2H 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 5 6OC-ALCOO-ALCWR-ALC

0-1/3 completeHaven't Initiated

Phase IIPhase I Phase III

Complete2/3 or more complete1/3-2/3 complete

December 19, 2007

April 3, 2008

Page 47: IUID Metrics

47

Air Force Issues/Challenges

• Implementation at depots hampered by lack of funding for engineering analysis for aircraft sub-components

– Requires more scrutiny to changes that may affect form/fit/function of a critical sub-component

• Opportunistic marking approach of existing systems puts asset meeting criteria by 31 Dec 2010 at risk

– Items with long maintenance cycles and low demand may not be physically marked

– Developing standard depot marking process to mitigate issue and reduce the population of unmarked items

• These are key topics for discussion at AF AIT Program Review and AIT WG 7-10 April

December 19, 2007 April 3, 2007

Page 48: IUID Metrics

48

Air Force IUID Good News Supporting the Warfighter

• Interdependencies between AF ERP (ECSS) and IUID identified and being tracked at Air Staff level– Exchange of Fielding Strategies/Schedules– Exchange of Process Models and Gap Analyses for SNT

Processes (Warranty & Reliability Pathfinders)– Data Element Requirements between legacy systems and ECSS

• Depot Training Course in development– DAU developing a course specifically designed for depot IUID

implementation

• AF AIT PMR scheduled for 8-10 Apr 08

Page 49: IUID Metrics

49

Army IUID ScorecardUpdate

Page 50: IUID Metrics

50

Army Requirements Documents Supporting IUID

December 19, 2007• ASA(ALT) memo, dated 22 Dec

04, subject: Implementation of Unique Identification (UID) Policy

• ASA(ALT) memo, dated 2 Apr 07, subject: Policy Update for Item Unique Identification (IUID) of Tangible Personal Property.

• Established an IUID Integrated Process Team (IPT)

– Jointly chaired by ASA(ALT) and Army G-4

– Focus:• Establish governance• Implement Army Strategy• Guide implementation• Develop standard Army UID

business practices

April 3, 2008• ASA(ALT) PARC/Policy Alert 08-

12, dated 16 Jan 08, subject: Item Unique Identification (IUID) Compliance and Reporting

– Contracting personnel required to complete DAU CLC 033 – “Contract Format/Structure for DoD eBusiness” (4,941 trained as of 29 Feb 08)

– Contracting Officers required to include DFARS clause 252.211-7003 in All Solicitations and contracts for supplies

• DRAFT Army IUID Strategy – Staffed to IUID Integrated Process

Team (IPT) for review & comment– Comments under review by

ASA(ALT)

Page 51: IUID Metrics

51

Army Business Practices Supporting IUID

December 19, 2007

Examples:

• The JPEO-CBD's (Chem-Bio Defense) “Business Practices" for UID are documented on the following:

– The JPEO-CBD PLAN FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF DOD UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION (UID) AND RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID) POLICY AND STANDARDS August 27, 2007 Version 2.2 https://jpeocbd.altess.army.mil/livelink/llisapi.dll?func=ll&objId=1123766&objAction=browse&sort=name

• AMCOM’s Depot Process established for Corpus Christie Army Depot

– DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY TECHNICAL BULLETIN ITEM UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION (IUID) - DATA PLATE FABRICATION AND IUID MARK REGISTRATION, U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command, Redstone Arsenal, Al 35898 - Dated 9 October 2007

• Participating in DLA IUID Business Practices Working Group

April 3, 2008

• Maintenance Consolidated Database System (MCDS) – AMCOM

– UID incorporated into business process– Master collection point for Army Aviation

serialized item management (SIM)– Two-way communication with DoD IUID

Registry• Army IUID IPT to develop standardized

business rules & processes• Army Logistics Support Activity (LOGSA)

– IUID plan repository– Review IUID implementation plans and updates prior to milestone decision authority approval– “Good News Stories” and “Lessons Learned”

• AMC AIT/IUID Workgroup Meeting 4-6 Mar– Path ahead for AMC AIT Program– AMC Data Registry Management– Serialized Item Management Initiatives– Industry Presentations

Page 52: IUID Metrics

5252

IUID Program Plan ResourcingDecember 19, 2007

AMCOM CECOM TACOM

% Of Plans For Which Resources Were Identified *

77% 72% 29%

% Of Plans Funded * 0% 0% 0%**

*Some plans state they will fund from existing funds (non-PPBE)** One plan (Soldier Weapons) requested funds that were approved

March 19, 2008

AMCOM CECOM TACOM

% Of Plans For Which Resources Were Identified *

77% 72% 29%

% Of Plans Funded 0% 0% 0%

*Plans currently in annual update cycle

Page 53: IUID Metrics

53

UII Registration Progress Report Army wide Totals

0102030405060708090

100

FY05FY07

FY09FY11

FY13

PlannedActual

Perc

enta

ge

0102030405060708090

100

FY05FY07

FY09FY11

FY13

PlannedActual

Perc

enta

ge

December 19, 2007 April 3, 2008

ACA ITEC4
I just randomly changed the numbers for March to show a difference as an example.
Page 54: IUID Metrics

54

Depot IUID Readiness Related to OSD “Y” Chart

Phase IConducting Preliminary Research & Planning Efforts

Phase II

Determining New Business Environment & Establishing Transition Plan For Initial Items Targeted

Phase III

Executing Transition Plan & Developing Implementation Plan For Remaining IUID Items

100%75%50%25%0%

100%75%50%25%0%

100%75%50%25%0%80% 85%

75%50% 75%85%

80%80%

25%80% 80%10%95% 75% 65%75%45% 60% 50% 95% 40%

75% 80%16%95% 50%75%45% 60% 50% 95% 40%

25% 35%16%95% 10% 35%25%25% 75% 70% 95% 10% 0%

10%

0%

0%

PreviousCurrent

25%

0%50% 85%

85%

Page 55: IUID Metrics

5555

Military Equipment ValuationPhase 1,2 & 3 Results

December 19, 2007• Total Number of Items

Eligible– Phase 1 Eligible = 81– Phase 2 Eligible = 185– Phase 3 Eligible = 426

• Total Number of Items Entered into the IUID Registry– As of 5 Dec 07 = 912,434

New into IUID Registry

April 3, 2008• Total Number of Items

Entered into the IUID Registry– As of 10 Mar 08 =

1,208,999

Page 56: IUID Metrics

56

Army Issues/Challenges

• Resources for implementation of IUID

• Updating technical data supported by engineering analysis

• Army AIS requirements integration with JUDI

• Metrics– Implementation progress compared

to IUID plans– Funding requests and funding approvals

• Army automated information system (AIS) integration

– Define Army requirements– Provide expertise to OSD

• Standardized business processes• IUID Registry

– Management controls– Application of virtual UIIs

• Soldier/User Interface Reqts– PBUSE– Installation implementation of IUID– Training

Army IUID IPTDecember 19, 2007 April 3, 2008

Sub-IPTs

Page 57: IUID Metrics

57

• Maintenance Consolidated Database System (MCDS), Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM)

• IUID Road Show, Tank and Automotive Command (TACOM) to sponsor at Rock Island Arsenal TBD (Jun 08)– Define IUID requirements at implementation level– Training modules– PEO/PM PEO interaction

• Leveraging Army LOGSA• Site-visits supporting IUID

– AMC:• Sierra Army Depot - feasibility of marking items in storage 17-21 Mar 08 • CCAD - DIACAP requirements TBD (Apr 08)• LOGSA - IUID Registry integration and interface TBD (Apr 08)

– PM J-AIT:• TOAD - Logistics Modernization Program and IUID integration 18-20 Mar 08

Army IUID Good News Supporting the Soldiers

Page 58: IUID Metrics

58

Back Up

Page 59: IUID Metrics

59

Phase III

Phase IIPhase I

IUID Implementation

Tower

Instructions: Color code steps on the tower to indicate level of progress

Conducting Preliminary Research &

Planning Efforts

Determining New Business Environment & Establishing Transition

Plan For Initial Items Targeted

Executing Transition Plan & Developing Implementation Plan

For Remaining IUID Items

Haven’t initiated

0 – 1/3 Complete

1/3 – 2/3 Complete

2/3 or More Complete

2a

Complete

1

2

3

4

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

42c

2d

2e

2f

2g

2h

2i

3

6

5

2b 3

2

1 1Establish Depot UID IPT

Develop IPT action plan & milestones

Research candidateitems with PM & IMs

Research marking options

Determine local serializationschema

Conduct engineering analysis

Explore processes

Determine QC requirements

Cost analysis

Determine funding responsibilities

Map current processes

Develop implementation schedule

Coordinate serialization schema

Obtain and implement tech instructions

Establish marking source

Map future processes

Establish marking capability

Establish depot management structure

Draft depot tech instructions & policy

Establish QC processes

Prepare depot budget and define fiscal responsibility

Create marking plan for initial items

Implement initial marking plan

Develop full implementation plan

Finalize depot instructions & policy

Review and adjust funding estimates

Execute full marking plan & depot marking program

Initiate CPI

Page 60: IUID Metrics

60

DoD Capstone DoDAAC BenchmarkDoD Capstone DoDAAC Benchmark(IUID Procurement Policy Deployment) (IUID Procurement Policy Deployment) As of

December 19, 2007