Con fes sionsof a

Brit ishPrime

Min is ter

Dis raelion the Jews

Page 16

Volume 12 Num ber 10 October 2010 In vit ing the Zi on ist-con trolled me dia¢cracy to meet a ris ing free South

The FirstFree dom

SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: First-time read ers ofal ter nate news, es pe cially boob tube ba bies, may ex pe ri encese vere loss of con fi dence in the Es tab lish ment press and TV.

www.14thfraud.com $2.00

P. O. Box 385 Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

Self-gov ern ment be gins at home

It’s here to stay.Y’all have a nice day.

FordPage 16

natvan.com/who-rules-amer ica

The di rect path of honor – stat ing one’strue feel ings – was blocked when ourme dia fell to the en emy in the 1960s. We travel cir cu itous routes to day,po liced by systemites who can’t ad mitwhom they serve. To re ceive the next 12 monthlyis sues of this right-wing “ex trem ist” news pa per any where in theC.S.A. or U.S., send $25 Fed eral Re serve Notes, check, money or der orone real sil ver dol lar to TFF, P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576.

A

88

Page 4

Race to

rev eillePage 4

Na tional Con ven tion8-9 Oc to ber 2010 – Page 5

— and —

South ernNa tionalCongress

12-14 No vem ber 2010 De tails also on page 5

The amaz ingDa vid Dees

Page 6

Joel Rorie is back!Page 10

What ev erycat is

dis cov er inglately

Can non fod derfor the

New WorldOr der

Page 12

Sher iffMack Page 13

Her mur der vin di catedPage 18

Piper and Renoufon Birobidjan

Page 19

Re vis it ing that

An thrax labPage 20

Corrie’s mur dererstill not hanged

Page 22

Free dom of as so ci a tion no prob lem for someViet nam vet eran and at tor ney

Rich ard Barrett as a Dem o craticcan di date for Mis sis sippi Gov er norplaced third out of eight. Re fus inga de mand by Rob ert John son ofthe Black Cau cus to “apol o gize”for seg re ga tion, this ed i tor of themonthly tab loid All The Way andwebmaster for Crosstar, au thor ofThe Com mis sion and speaker forthe Na tion al ist Move ment, re pliedas fol lows. As sas si nated five monthsago by a Black hit team, Barrett’skiller will ap pear in Rankin CountyCourt on Jan u ary 31, 2011.

By Rich ard BarrettI DO NOT INSIST upon an apol ogy for

seg re ga tion from Rob ert John son. John son,a Ne gro from Natchez, Mis sis sippi, hasde manded that I apol o gize for seg re ga tion,whereas John son is, him self, a prac ti tio nerof seg re ga tion. Seg re ga tion is the so cial,po lit i cal and le gal sys tem whereby thosewho are dif fer ent “touch with out col lid ing.”It holds that the laws of God and na ture arestron ger and higher than those of man.Seg re ga tion came un der at tack from theCom mu nist Party when the Reds sought to“em power” Ne groes to over throw Amer i canrule with Af ri can bar ba rism.

How ever, seg re ga tion per sists, inpat terns of mar riage, hous ing, school ingand em ploy ment – as a bul wark against“one-world in ter na tional Marx ism.”

John son seems im pelled by the no tionthat Amer i cans should be cas ti gated forseg re ga tion, but that Ne groes should not,though both groups prac tice seg re ga tion.How ever, as Eu gene Talmadge once said,

“I may sur prise you, but I will not lie toyou.” It may come as a sur prise, but I donot be come ran kled when John son walksthrough the doors of his self-de scribed“Af ri can Meth od ist-Epis co pal” church tocom mune with his own, any more than Iex pect a preacher to rip out the first chap ter of Gen e sis for re cit ing that God cre atedeach “af ter its own kind.” I do not de mandthat John son change his sign from “Af ri can”to “Af ri can-Amer i can” to sug gest somesort of hy phen ated loy alty or frag mentedna tion al ity.

I am con tent that John son feel “at home” among his peo ple, ways and sen si bil i ties.Be ing in his “Af ri can” church, sing ingNe gro spir i tu als and even beat ing on drumsdoes not de tract from me, pro vided that thepul pit is not used to hatch sub ver sion.John son has mar ried some one of his ownblood line. No apol ogy needed for that,al though some may crit i cize the oneem brac ing a seg re gated mar riage forup braid ing oth ers not of Af ri can de scentwho prac tice the same thing. John son isa mem ber of the Black Cau cus. Nei therI nor any one of my com plex ion may bead mit ted, but no apol ogy is re quired forsuch ex clu sion, any more than apol o giz ingfor not pre sent ing me with a schol ar shipfrom the United Ne gro Col lege Fund.

Free dom of as so ci a tion lets John sonhave his cau cus, club, church or fam ilywith out hav ing to apol o gize. John sonbrings crit i cism upon him self when heat tempts to deny oth ers what he claims forhim self, but he is en ti tled to his opin ionand needs ten der no apol ogy for ex er cis ing free speech.

He was placed in the Leg is la ture un dera 1965 act of Lyndon B. John son, whichhas drawn dis tricts to force Ne groes into

Rich ard Barrett

of fices to which they couldnot be elected. Even tak ingad van tage of that er rantmea sure does not prompt anapol ogy, any more than fromsome one who scoops up cash ac ci den tally blown out of anar mored car. Free bies are free bies. Theso lu tion is to lock doors, build fences andchange un just laws.

John son voted for House Res o lu tion32, which “com mended” the Na tionalAs so ci a tion for the Ad vance ment ofCol ored Peo ple. Un for tu nately, whereNe groes have “ad vanced,” such as byre plac ing Amer i can po lice men withAf ri cans, crime has pro lif er ated. WhereAmer i can neigh bor hoods have beenre placed by Af ri can “hoods,” qual ity oflife has plum meted. And where Amer i canteach ers have been re placed by thede scen dants of Af ri can slaves, ed u ca tionhas crum bled. How ever, John son owes noapol ogy for wish ing to be “proud” of his“moth er land,” “homies” or even Kwanzaa, not with stand ing that the Dark Con ti nenthas had no writ ten lan guage and nary awheel and still prac tices slav ery.

The rub co mes from Amer i cans whohave pan dered to John son, re treated fromprin ci ple and al lowed free dom to bedis par aged. They owe an apol ogy not forseg re ga tion but for sub ju ga tion. John son is a mem ber of a “vot ing league” com prisedof Ne groes seek ing Ne gro “ad vance ment.”

He does not need to apol o gize for sit tingamong “birds of a feather,” sing ing thesame tune, speak ing Ebonics or, even,in ton ing “how we are proud to be Af ri can.”That his club is seg re gated is un der stood in the con text of de moc racy; that his “free dom”ends where the nose of an other be gins,how ever. That, af ter all, is what seg re ga tionis all about: John son be ing “in his place”and ev ery one else be ing in their places.

I owe John son no apol ogy for pre vent ingmi nor i ties from lord ing over the ma jor ity.“The United States of Amer ica” does notac quaint to “The Frag mented Spe cies ofDis union.’ De moc racy can not suc cumb to“di ver sity,” lest there be des po tism. Yet,de feat ing in te gra tion does not re quireJohn son to “cry un cle.” No Sta lin-likepurge beck ons, re quir ing John son to“con fess his crimes” and apol o gize forhav ing been born a Ne gro. Seg re ga tionsim ply, per haps iron i cally, af firms whatJohn son has said, all along, that “WeAf ri cans will have our way,” ex cept to addthat “We Amer i cans shall, also, have ourway.” And, when the two col lide, thema jor ity must rule. That is not onlyseg re ga tion but Amer i can ism.

Anti-Def a ma tion Leaguede fames the truth

Page 24

HELP WANTED – Ter ror ists needed now! If you qual ify,see cou pon at bot tom of next page. Pay? No, YOU pay us.

EdgarSteeleHis case against

ZOG clinchedPage 8

Wan ing but not yet dead

Me diaCon trol

Pages 11 & 14

— South ern Pov erty Truth Cen ter —

HERE’S WHAT WAS IGNORED OR MISREPORTED ELSEWHERE:

Para noia Club ac cuses world for its own peecee reclusiveness

“Be as sured that if this new pro vi sion [the 14th Amend ment] be en grafted inthe Con sti tu tion, it will, in time, change the en tire struc ture and tex ture ofour gov ern ment, and sweep away allthe guar an tees of safety de vised andpro vided by our pa tri otic Sires of theRev o lu tion.” – Orville Brown ing

Sec. of the In te rior (1867)

Scalawag of the Month

Dan Jones

The First Free domP.O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

________________________________________FULL NAME

________________________________________MAIL ADDRESS

________________________________________CITY STATE ZIP

________________________________________REMARKS

ð Here’s $25 for a one-year sub scrip tionð $35 for same, but in 1st class envelopeð $30 for 100 ex tra cop ies of cur rent is sueð $25 for 100 back is sues; pre fer_______ð $15 for 22 ex tra cop ies of cur rent is sueð $10 for 10 ex tra cop ies of cur rent is sueð $_________as a pa tron. Keep it go ing!

2 The First Free dom October 2010P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

MEXICAN CITIZEN JoseManuel Gon za les-Sandoval wasor dered de ported ear lier thisyear. But an im mi gra tion judgesaid no. A spokes man for ICE inPhoe nix says of fi cials had sought to re voke Jose’s res i dency sta tusfol low ing his 15 pre vi ous crim i nalcases. Ac cused of hav ing shot atPinal County sher iff’s dep u tieslast month, he’s back in cus tody.

FOUR MEXICANS, threeof them in the coun try il le gally,ar rested last month at Phoe nix, had stashed 49 as sault-styleAK-47 ri fles and more than 13bales of mar i juana. But let usnot go jump ing to con clu sions.As the Ken yan in the WhiteHouse would say, read ing hisJew ish lines: “Why can’t we all just get along?” His han dlerswill sic a federal judge onto any State that thinks it might getaway with “ra cial pro fil ing.”

Speech and re li gion were al ready oursback when FDR named “four free doms.”But he would whip hun ger, fear and op pres sion,ab stain ing for ever from Eu rope’s wars.

When pol i ti cians lie, the State bites offwhat only in di vid u als can chew.It’s time we re cov eredthose pow ers not del e gated.

The FirstFree dom

Self-gov ern ment be gins at homeP.O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

www.14thfraud.comEd i tor: Olaf Childress

firstfreedom@gulftel.comCor re spon dents: Lloyd Caperton, Chris DeHuff,Nancy Hitt, Bill Ivy, Greg Kay, Chris tine Miller,Kurt Nimmo, John Peeples, Don ald Sullivan,Steve Wat son, Ing rid Rimland Zündel.

TO SUBSCRIBE: Send $25 in FRNs, check,money or der or one sil ver dol lar for the next 12monthly is sues by mail any where in C.S.A. or U.S.

Self-gov ern ment be gins at home. Let pa tri o tism, in obe di ence to God, eman ci pate our im pris onedher i tage! Join this non profit news pa per and helpde-pro gram the brain washed pop u la tion. Ex ceptfor copy righted ar ti cles, any one may re print orquote The First Free dom in whole or part; justgive full credit and ad dress.

We care fully edit sub mit ted manu scripts to fitspace and style sheet with out chang ing mean ing,pre fer email, pub lish only the writer’s name, cityand State but need ad dress and phone ver i fi ca tion.

THIS DEPRESSION is forc ing townsto stop add ing flu o ride to their wa ter. “Iguess we wound up sav ing fifty thou sanddol lars a year, and we’re a small sys tem sothat’s a big sav ings,” said Joe Beasley ofthe Red Bay Wa ter and Gas De part ment inAl a bama. Officials there looked at sev eralstud ies and found no ev i dence to sup portkeep ing flu o ride in the water.

The Uni ver sity of Mis sis sippi maychoose an other, but Col o nel Rebwill be the only Ole Miss mas cot.Most of this ac count was writ ten by Rich ard Barrett, as sas si nated fivemonths ago by a Black hit squad.

na tion al ist.org

OXFORD – Stu dents at the Uni ver sityof Mis sis sippi are in open re bel lion against the lat est move by newly-ap pointedChan cel lor Dan Jones to trash Con fed er ate sym bols. At first, Jones for bade stu dentsfrom chant ing The South Shall Rise Again. They did so any how. Then he bannedDixie. The stu dents kept on whis tling it.Then he sched uled a “vote” in which theonly choices were to abol ish the Col o nelReb mas cot or have no mas cot. Stu dentshad al ready voted by ninety-four per cent to keep the Col o nel, de spite ob jec tions fromthe Black Cau cus.

Col o nel Reb rules fired up.Na tion al ists, hav ing ex posed the rig ging

of a prior “con test” to re place the mas cot in con duct ing a mas sive pro-Col o nel rally oncam pus, called upon stu dents to rise up.Even the Daily Mis sis sip pian pub lished

Dr. Scalawag Jones

TSSRA and Dixie spirit im pels pro-Col o nel re bel lion

a ban ner, “Stu dents De niedChoice Over Mas cot,” call ingthe stu dents “jus ti fied” inop pos ing Jones. When thepre vi ous Chan cel lor hadtried to ban the Con fed er ateflag, vot ers adopted theban ner as the State flag,by a two-to-one mar gin.Mean while, Col lege BoardPres i dent Scott Ross re fused to al low Col o nel Reb pro-ponents to pres ent pe ti tions.How ever, un der threat of le gal ac tionfrom the Na tion al ists, At tor ney Gen eralJim Hood said that he would “re con sider.”

Eliz a beth Tettleton, vow ing that what -ever Jones did would have no ef fect, said,“The Uni ver sity of Mis sis sippi maychoose an other mas cot, but Col o nel Rebwill be the only Ole Miss mas cot.”

Stu dents are boy cott ing the “So viet-style” “vote” or voting “no.”

Other voicesOXFORD – It’s hard to con ceive of an

in sti tu tion with an im age more en twinedwith South ern his tory and tra di tion thanthe tree-shaded cam pus of the Uni ver sity

of Mis sis sippi.Dur ing the so-called Civil

War, when Ole Miss was allmale, its en tire stu dent bodywith drew to en list in theCon fed er ate army. “Dixie”and the Con fed er ate bat tleflag still are main stays atsport ing events, and Col o nel Reb – a whis kered car i ca ture of a plan ta tion owner – is the school mas cot…

Rob ert Khayat, the CoastScalawag, did all he could to ruin Ole Miss– no more Col o nel Reb, no more Re belFlag – and now the “new and im proved”

Scalawag is tak ing up where “Peecee Bob” left off. Why don’t they just go ahead andchange the name from “Ole Miss” to“PCU”? I’m ashamed to have gone to OleMiss, now…

Ole Miss Chan cel lor Dan iel Jones hasasked the school’s band to stop play ing thesong “From Dixie With Love” at ath leticevents un til fur ther no tice. Fac ing crit i cism over its phrase, “The South Shall RiseAgain,” which fans chant dur ing a pause atthe end of the song, he agreed with thosewhin ing that this was “ra cially of fen sive.”Agree ing it’s OK to of fend the stu dent bodywith Peecee Ed, Jones had asked the bandto elim i nate the pause. But fans con tin uedwith the chant. He then forbade the song,say ing that wasn’t per ma nent; if the chantstops, the song might re turn… TSSRA.

“DEAR FRIEND of Is rael” be ganthe stan dard in no cent pitch lastmonth. “This is a crit i cal time atAIPAC… You are likely aware ofthe many se ri ous threats now fac ingIs rael: To the north, Hizballah ismov ing fight ers and weap ons –pro vided by Syria and Iran – intoci vil ian vil lages and pop u la tioncen ters… amass ing an es ti mated45,000 rock ets on Is rael’s bor der.To the south, a re-armed Hamas has been em bold ened by the flo tillain ci dent and its af ter math. To theeast, a rad i cal Iran con tin ues itsil licit nu clear pur suit. CIA Di rec torPanetta now es ti mates Iran hasenough low en riched ura nium fortwo nu clear bombs. To the west,the U.N. in New York is pre par ingnew at tacks on Is rael’s le git i macy,part of a global move ment aimedat mak ing Is rael one of the mostiso lated na tions in the world… In

THE EXTENSIVE and me tic u lousin ves ti ga tive re port by the U. N. Hu manRights Coun cil con cern ing that pi racyof May 31 against the Free Gaza flo tillawas re leased on Sep tem ber 22, 2010.In ter view ing 112 sur vi vors but for bid denby the lit tle rogue State of Is rael fromques tion ing any of its com man does, there port dev as tates that re gime’s claim ofin no cence, and shreds its in ter na tionalrep u ta tion. In jur ing scores of Free Gaza hu man i tar ian aid work ers while kill ingnine of the Mavi Mamara’s crew, onlyJew ish con trol of the world’s money and me dia kept this act of war from re call ing Is rael’s even greater atroc ity in wa tersvery nearby, namely Is rael’s 1967 at tack on the USS Lib erty of which most peo pleknow noth ing.

JEWISH GROUPS get the bulk ofHome land Ob scu rity’s fund ing. Of $24mil lion to tal grants, they pock eted $19.6mil lion, DHS hav ing given $19 mil lion to non-prof its – mostly Jew ish. Of the 271grants listed in Sep tem ber by DHS, 254went to Jew ish syn a gogues, com mu nitycen ters, of fices and schools. No won derthey’re so hot for re dis tri bu tion.

the com ing weeks alone, we must…”Ugh! What you mean, “we,” Kimo

Sabe? Just get a job – and a life.

1. The piece meal Peace Meal 2. “May I?”

1

2

THE PURPOSE be hind di rect ing ouran ger at those “Mus lims” want ing to builda mosque at Ground Zero and “the Mus lim”in the White House is to keep us vot ing the“out” wing of that Zi on ist buz zard back in.

EDITOR’S NOTE

Amer i cans will next month re fuseagain “to throw away” their votes ona third party, fall ing for this bi en nialme dia the ater as usual. I don’t meanseek ers of State and lo cal of fices, butthe “na tional” can di dates – Dis trict of Cor rup tion stooges who un der standit’s noth ing per sonal if the “in” partygets car i ca tured with long ears at thistime, call ing its sis ter troupe wait ingin the wings back on stage to an gryand thun der ous ap plause. Please, ifyou must vote, then for a third party,any third party, even while hoping tobring all the lesser non-es tab lish ment play ers un der one roof and pray ingfor a mir a cle, as many of us do daily.

“GOOD WILL.” The U. S. helped tore build the Fallujah hos pi tal, in whichmany women now give birth to ba bieswith de for mi ties – caused by de pletedura nium, white phos pho rous, chem i caland other weap ons used by oc cu pa tionforces dur ing the ear lier as saults there.

TV “news” lost 700,000 view ers in the last year, and al most daily a news pa pernow must lay peo ple off or shut its doors.

PUT IT BACKYour “rep re sen ta tives” – for bid den by the South ern Pu berty Lech ery Cen ter, a

fed eral Af fir ma tive Ac tion Ap pa rat chik and those new vot ing ma chines to dis playsuch re mind ers in a build ing full of judges, law yers and pol i ti cians – have ban ishedthe Ten Com mand ments from the Al a bama Su preme Court now for 85 months.

— First things — The First Free dom October 2010 3P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

The Re pub li can form: gone with the winds since 1868The 17th Amend ment re moved

from the U. S. Sen ate the voices ofState Leg is la tures and thus Statesov er eignty, re tir ing the Com pact.

By John Peeplesfirstfreedom@gulftel.com

Re gard ing the elec tion of U. S. Sen a torsthe Con sti tu tion stated in Ar ti cle I, Sec tion3, “The Sen ate of the United States shall be com posed of two Sen a tors from each State, cho sen by the Leg is la ture thereof, for sixyears; and each Sen a tor shall have one vote.”

Our Found ing Fa thers pre pared a House of Rep re sen ta tives elected by the Peo ple,while each State Leg is la ture would send its two-mem ber del e ga tion to the Sen ate, theequiv a lent of Eng land’s bal anced Housesof Lords and Com mons.

The 17th Amend ment – “rat i fied” April8, 1913, an other one of Woodrow Wil son’s leg a cies – “amended” that solid pre cept to:“The Sen ate of the United States shall becom posed of two Sen a tors from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years;and each Sen a tor shall have one vote.”

The 17th Amend ment, pro moted un derthe slo gan that a di rect pop u lar vote wouldprove more “dem o cratic,” ig nored the factthat the Con sti tu tion’s Ar ti cle IV, Sec tion 4,de clares: “The United States shall guar an teeto ev ery State in this Un ion a Re pub li canform of Gov ern ment.”

With the rat i fi ca tion of this amend mentthe States lost their rights le gally – but notdic ta to ri ally by force, as with Lin coln’swar, Re con struc tion and the amend mentsfol low ing that oc cu pa tion of the South.

The 17th Amend ment hyped Amer i cande moc racy, a form of gov ern ment that theorig i nal sign ers of the Con sti tu tion wishedto avoid, hav ing con sid ered it a form ofmob rule where the more ig no rant ma jor ity sets the rules deciding which dem a goguesshould get gov ern ment jobs.

“Re mem ber, de moc racy never lasts long. It soon wastes, ex hausts and mur ders it self.”

– John Ad amsIt is said that Benjamin Frank lin, el dest

at the Con sti tu tional Con ven tion, emergedfrom its fi nal ses sion and re sponded to theques tion, “What kind of gov ern ment haveyou given us?” thusly: “A re pub lic, if youcan keep it.” Yet few pol i ti cians now knowany thing about that re pub lic, and prat tle on con tin u ously about “our de moc racy” and“spread ing de moc racy.”

The U. S. was con fed er ated as a re pub lic,which means rule by law, a pre cept to keepdes pots and dic ta tors from seiz ing il le galpow ers and act ing on their own vo li tion tothe det ri ment of Cit i zens and States.

A doc u ment lim it ing the con fed er atedgov ern ment’s role to “ex pressed pow ers,”the States had agreed among them selves togo with the new Con sti tu tion only af ter itsAr ti cle I, Sec tion 8, Clauses 1-18 boundtheir del e gated Fed eral of fi cers to lim ited,enu mer ated and clearly de fined roles while re serv ing all other pow ers to the States andthe Peo ple thereof: a re pub lic ruled not byma jor ity mob pas sions, elite con triv ances,po lit i cal par ties or spe cial in ter est groups – but by law!

I am no less cer tain than any his to rianas to what Ar ti cle IV, Sec tion 4, calls for:“The United States shall guar an tee to ev ery State in this Un ion a Re pub li can Form ofGov ern ment.” Be cause writ ten in a terseman ner, the Con sti tu tion does not ex plainwhat that op er a tive word means. Only inthis one clause does the com pact be tweenour States re fer to re pub li can ism, but thosehav ing con ducted a de tailed study of manyhis tor i cal doc u ments and pa pers enlargingon this sub ject know with as sur ance what it means.

We dis cover in the Charles CotesworthPinckney Pa pers this Found ing Fa ther, Mr. Pinckney of South Carolina, stat ing, “[N]opow ers could be ex e cuted or as sumed [bythe Fed eral gov ern ment] but such as wereex pressly del e gated.”

Re pub li can ism is fur ther con firmed in

Doc u ments of the Amer i can Rev o lu tion,Jour nals of the Con ti nen tal Con gress, theAr ti cles of Con fed er a tion, the Fed er al istPa pers, the Anti-Fed er al ists, St. GeorgeTucker’s (Vir ginia) anal y sis of the Fed eralCon sti tu tion in his edi tion of Blackstone’sCom men tar ies on the Laws of Eng land aspub lished in 1803, Wil liam Rawle’s 1825A View of the Con sti tu tion of the UnitedStates of Amer ica and in the Con gres sio nal Globes, the An nals of Con gress, plus many Con gres sio nal Re cords, show ing what theFram ers meant by “Re pub li can Form of

Gov ern ment.” Yet those who attend lawschool with out study ing these doc u mentsre main fixed in their ig no rance thereof.

For ex am ple, a re cent state ment by U. S. Sen a tor Lindsey Gra ham (R-SC) re gard ing that piv otal fraud im posed by a des poticCon gress in 1868: “I am not quite sure whatthe draft ers of the 14th Amend ment had inmind when they wrote this amend ment.”(“Re pub li cans to change parts of the 14thAmend ment – ‘an chor ba bies’,” Amer i canFree Press, 30 Au gust 2010.)

If Mr. Gra ham, his fel low Sen a tors andCon gress men had stud ied their his tory andknew the Con sti tu tion, they would haveknown the so-called 14th Amend ment didnot re ceive rat i fi ca tion by three-fourths ofthe States as re quired un der Ar ti cle V, thusit is not law. Mr. Gra ham, Sir, that neverhap pened, and it’s all in the Con gres sio nalRe cords. Sen a tor, look it up, dis cover thatthis so-called 14th Amend ment ar rived byforce; it’s a fraud. You pop u larly-electedSen a tors and Con gress men serv ing at theplea sure of to day’s mis in form ing, mad ding me dia, need first to get a clue, then startreading U. S. his tory – es pe cially as re lat esto our re pub lic’s found ing doc u ments.

Those wise and far sighted Fram ers ofthe Con sti tu tion knew their his tory. Theyhad read and in deed be come well-versed in the an nals of con fed er a tions, re pub lics andde moc ra cies – the an cient trials of Greece,Rome and Eng land.

Our Found ing Fa thers sup ported theirpo si tions and ar gu ments dur ing those firstthree weeks of stud ied de lib er a tions at theCon sti tu tional Con ven tion with facts fromhis tory, no fewer than thirty times quot ingat length from Locke’s Two trea ties ofGov ern ment, Bolingbroke, Har ring ton’sOceana, Emmerich de Vattel’s Law ofNa tions and Blackstone’s Com men tar ies.They had not just read, but stud ied, Cicero, Polybius, Demosthenes, Ar is totle, Rob ertAlan’s The Birth and Fall of Rights, Sen eca,Marcus Aurelius, Ad di son’s Cato, New ton

and, above all, the Chris tian Bi ble.We would per haps search in vain to find

even one mem ber of the House or Sen atewho has read a cou ple of these courses inhis tory and phi los o phy. The Fram ers stoodas gi ants among men, two hun dred or more years be fore their time.

Those Con ven tion del e gates un der stood their “Re pub li can Form of Gov ern ment”clause as chang ing noth ing in the struc tureof the par tic i pat ing States, nor lim it ing thelat ter’s pow ers other than ex press ing thatall State laws must stand in con so nancewith the Fed eral Con sti tu tion.

Al ex an der Ham il ton, who was an ar dent Fed er al ist (ac tu ally a con sum mate cen tristor mon ar chist), agreed that, “If we did notgive the re pub li can form (of gov ern ment)due sta bil ity and wis dom it would be lostamong our selves, dis graced and lost tomankind forever.”

Sadly, in spite of ev ery ef fort by theFram ers to save it from ty rants and abus ersof the Con sti tu tion, the re pub li can form isto day “lost among our selves, dis graced andlost to man kind for ever.”

Our South ern sol diers were fight ing tomain tain the re pub lic – not a gar gan tuan,dem o cratic bu reau cracy that would usurpau thor ity in ev ery area of our lives, but acon sti tu tional re pub lic of re pub lics; notone coun try, one na tion, but what would intime have meant fifty sep a rate re pub lics all united in con trol of, not by, a con fed er atedgov ern ment strictly lim ited to its del e gated pow ers and ac knowl edg ing that sta tus assub ser vi ent. Each of these “re pub lics” stillpub lishes its State Con sti tu tion, if hor ribly“rat i fied” by those 1868 usurp ers, and canre claim the U. S. Con sti tu tion’s guar an teed re pub li can form of gov ern ment any time.

To see the hy poc risy of this “dem o cratic”sales pitch, you only have to look at whatthe 17th Amend ment’s pro mot ers had, withtheir “Soak the rich” slo gan merely twomonths ear lier on 3 Feb ru ary 1913, sold to a hood winked pub lic: the 16th Amend mentin come tax. Forty-seven per cent of el i gi ble tax pay ers to day pay no in come tax. Whichmeans the other 53% of Amer i cans pay the“pro gres sive” in come tax that com prisedthe foun da tion of Karl Marx’s Com mu nistpro gram.

The 17th Amend ment de prived Stategov ern ments of their rep re sen ta tion in theSen ate which, to gether with the Peo ple’sHouse of Rep re sen ta tives, had kept thecon fed er a tion subservient un til Lin coln’swar. Now see where all of that “amend ing”– like to day’s phony “peace pro cess” – hasgot us.

And the great ma jor ity of our ig no rantPeo ple can not, will not, un der stand that the Fed eral gov ern ment’s in ter fer ence in theirlives de pends on the le git i macy of all those so-called amend ments, go ing back to theone that any stu dent ca pa ble of read ing can com pre hend hav ing ar rived by force. Theso-called 14th Amend ment is a fraud. All it takes to con firm this is a lit tle prob ing. If

the au then tic U. S. Con sti tu tion were stillin use, our sov er eign States – in dis re gardof me dia-in sti gated pas sions – might re call Sen a tors de vi at ing from in struc tions laiddown to them by their State leg is la tures, sothat we would n’t find our selves in the direstraits suf fo cat ing per sonal lib er ties to day.

The fraud u lent four teenth amend mentun con sti tu tion ally “le git i mized” un lim itedFed eral gov ern ment in ter fer ence into theaf fairs of cit i zens through out the sev eralStates. The con fed er ated re pub li can form isno more, the U. S., in cor po rated, a de factocen tral State – with its 17th “amend ment”( -mend'ment), n. 1. im prove ment; bet ter -ment. 2. a cor rec tion of er rors, faults, etc. –hav ing swept away that fi nal set of checksand bal ances. We, the Peo ple, to day haveno re main ing protections against im post ers pre tend ing its le git i macy in ex change for ashare in the loot.

Woodrow Wil son’s ad min is tra tion sawthree ad di tion ally no to ri ous “amend ments”de clared “law,” the 16th, 17th and 18th, the sec ond-worst dis tor tions, un til then, of theU. S. Con sti tu tion – first place re main ingfor ever by Lin coln’s War of Ag gres sion,Re con struc tion and its bastards – the 14thand 15th “amend ments.”

The so-called 14th amend ment, cen tralgov ern ment’s point of or i gin, cor ner stoneupon which raged at first this na tional ideaof States sur ren der ing their sov er eign ties,in ef fect said the 9th and 10th Amend ments no lon ger held any force.

But the 14th never rat i fied!Per haps some one should send Sen a tor

Lindsey Gra ham an in for ma tion packet torestart him back where he failed Amer i canhis tory. For knowl edge is power.

Know your U. S. his tory.Know your Con sti tu tion.Know the his tory be hind the fraud u lent

four teenth amend ment.Know the en emy.

“It is an ax iom in po lit i cal sci ence,that un less a peo ple are ed u catedand en light ened, it is idle to ex pectthe con tin u ance of civil lib erty, orthe ca pac ity for self gov ern ment.”

– From the Texas Dec la ra tion ofIn de pend ence, 2 March 1836

Deo vindice. I have the honor to be,Very re spect fully,Jn. H. PeeplesUn re con structed South erner

e

It has been 85 months sinceyou op por tun ists heisted our

mon u ment.

Put it back

— Opin ions —

Or der ex tra cop ies of

The FirstFree dom

Help your friends shed thescales from their eyes!

See cou pon at bot tom of page 2

“The prin ci ple for which wecon tend is bound to re as sert

it self, though it may beat an other time and in

an other form.”

– Pres i dent Jef fer son Da vis

4 The First Free dom October 2010P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

The truth

By Linh Dinhsabbah.biz

All gov ern ments lie, kill and mis usepub lic funds, but these cal cu lated hab itsare am pli fied man i fold dur ing wars. We’rein two now, and aim ing for a third. Ja pan,whose land we’re to day stilloc cu py ing 65 years fol low ing Hi ro shima, has just an nouncedsanc tions against Iran be yondwhat the U.N. had man dated.South Ko rea swiftly fol lowedsuit. It’s sur pris ing to seethese two coun tries so in sync, un til one re mem bers thatthey have be come Amer i cancheer lead ers for de cades.Rah, rah, bomb Teh ran! Amur der ous cho rus is ris ingyet again. Coun tries thataren’t our cli ent States can becounted on two hands, evenby those miss ing fin gers froman ex ploded gre nade.

The me dia drummed up

uni ver sal out rage over the case of anIra nian woman about to be stoned to deathfor adul tery. She’s also im pli cated in themur der of her hus band, for which she maybe hanged. This sec ond, more se ri ouscrime has been left out of many news

sto ries. Amer ica also ex e cutes, but does n’tstone, es pe cially for a bit of tick lish fun onthe side. We in ject, elec tro cute, gas, hangand shoot our con demned. We’re morehu mane that way. For ever bu reau cratic, we pay at ten tion to pro ce dural nice ties.

Col laps ing Amer ica

Our ob jec tion, then, is notto cap i tal pun ish ment, but itscer tain meth ods. Ston ing isbar baric. We don’t stone,pe riod, ex cept dur ing one ofour se rial wars, where we willstone en tire com mu ni tiesback to the Stone Age. Butthat’s war, buddy. We alsouse phos pho rous and clus terbombs, plant land mines thatwill last for gen er a tions. Torec tify and avenge the ston ing of one woman, how ever, thissome one we don’t re ally careabout, whose name we can’teven pro nounce, we’re quiteready to flat ten Iran, maybeby Thanksgiving.

Europa awake! A re bel lion against Third World in vad ers!A new hero for White peo ple has

ap peared. Here is Thilo Sarrazin.

By Ian Mosleywhitecivilrights.com

An ar ti cle from Ya hoo News re ports:“Pol i ti cians have rushed to con demn aboard mem ber of the Ger man cen tral bankfor a new book tack ling im mi gra tion, buthis views have found con sid er able sup portamong the pop u la tion at large. ThiloSarrazin’s book ‘is not con vinc ing, but ithas con vinced many peo ple,’ said thein flu en tial Spiegel mag a zine, which lastmonth had the Bundesbank ex ec u tive onits cover, call ing him a ‘peo ple’s hero.’ His

Thilo Sarrazin

pub lisher is rush ing to print more cop ies ofGer many Does It self In to meet de mand.On line re tailer Am a zon.de has a mas sive207 reader re views on its website, with theav er age score 4.4 stars out of a pos si blefive.”

The ar ro gant lib er als at Spiegel claimthe book is “not con vinc ing”? And yet the

pub lisher is hav ing trou ble print ing upenough books to meet de mand? And theau thor is widely con sid ered a “peo ple’shero”? White peo ple are al ready con vincedthat Mus lims don’t be long in Eu rope. They just need lead ers who will rep re sent themfor a change.

The ar ti cle notes the So cial Dem o crats(SPD), the cen ter-left po lit i cal party Sarrazinbe longs to, has been in un dated withthou sands of let ters, emails and phone calls at tack ing the cen tral bank board’s de sireto ex pel him. “Lis ten to the voice of thepeo ple for once,” Spiegel quoted one of the al most 4,000 emails as say ing. In the book,Sarrazin says Eu rope’s top econ omy isbe ing un der mined, over whelmed andmade more stu pid by poorly ed u cated, fast- breed ing, badly in te grated and un pro duc tiveMus lim im mi grants and their off spring. “If I want to hear the mu ez zin’s call to prayer,then I’ll go to the Ori ent,” he says, notingthat al low ing in mil lions of guest work ersin the 1960s and 70s was a gi gan tic er ror.He also observes that Turk ish and Kurdishclans have a long tra di tion of in breed ing,lead ing to higher rates of birth de fects, and

pon ders whether this might be one rea sonfor im mi grants’ poor school per for mance.

At least one of the ma jor na tions ofEu rope needs to just say “No,” or “Nein!”to Third World im mi gra tion. There is nopos i tive side to let ting in mil lions of needyThird World peo ple. They sim ply load upthe wel fare roles and take over valu ablehous ing in the big cit ies, mak ing vast ur ban ar eas too filthy, noisy and dan ger ous forWhites who don’t want to live in ThirdWorld slums.

Cu ri ously, It aly has been starting somepre lim i nary ac tions to ex pel and ex cludenon-White in vad ers. All it will take is onema jor Eu ro pean na tion to re bel against this “sui cide pact” of un lim ited im mi gra tion by the needy Third World poor. Then, if It alyor Ger many can block or ex pel such ThirdWorld peo ple, those White neigh bors inFrance and Brit ain will start ob ject ing tofind ing them selves neck-deep in Mus limsand send packing their sell out, trea son ouspol i ti cians who al lowed this invasion inthe first place.

natvan.com/who-rules-amer ica

LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH:

The Glenn Beck rally breaks wind

George Wallace and GeorgeGorman meet at theCen ten nial Get tys burgreenactment, July 1963.

On Sat ur day, 28 Au gust, wewit nessed – in the flesh – a falsedi chot omy in Wash ing ton, D. C.Not that this ought to sur priseany one.

conservativetimes.org

To para phrase a prom i nent South ernStates man, George Wallace: “There is n’t adime’s worth of dif fer ence ...”

On one side, we have Al Sharpton andhis merry band of Per pet u ally An gryCol ored Peo ple scream ing and shout ing to“Re claim the Dream” of Mar tin Lu therKing, Jr.

On the other, we find the Plump PastyWea sel of Faux Con ser va tism, Glenn Beck … do ing the very same thing.

Hmmm… Amer i can left ies and rightiesboth claim ing the leg acy of MLK, Jr.?Both left ies and righties meet ing at theshrine to out-of-con trol big gov ern ment,the Lin coln Me mo rial? The League of theSouth will pass on this deal.

Just how are these two groups dif fer ent? George Wallace was of course right, andbe cause of the failed po lices of both theleft ies and righties a dime to day buys only

88 pre ceptsBy Da vid Lane

(P.O.W.)

“We must se cure the ex is tence ofour peo ple and afu ture for Whitechil dren.

“Be cause thebeauty of the White Aryan woman mustnot per ish fromthe earth.”

The sec ond eight9. A pro lif er a tion of laws with the

re sul tant loss of free dom is a sign of, anddi rectly pro por tional to, spir i tual sick nessin a Na tion.

10. If a Na tion is de void of spir i tualhealth and moral char ac ter, then gov ern -ment and un prin ci pled men will fill theva cancy. There fore, free dom pros pers inmoral val ues and tyr anny thrives in moralde cay.

11. Truth re quires lit tle ex pla na tion.There fore, be ware of ver bose doc trines.The great prin ci ples are re vealed in

brev ity.12. Truth does not fear in ves ti ga tion.13. Un founded be lief is pit fall. A Peo ple

who do not check the va lid ity and ef fect oftheir be liefs with rea son will suf fer orper ish.

14. In ac cord with Na ture’s Laws,noth ing is more right than the pres er va tionof one’s own race.

15. No greater mo ti vat ing force ex iststhan the cer tain con vic tion that one is right.

16. Dis cern ment is a sign of ahealthy Peo ple. In a sick or dy ing na tion,civ i li za tion, cul ture or race, sub stance isaban doned in fa vor of ap pear ance.

OLD SOUTHGENERAL STORE AND PAWN SHOPWeogufka, AL CSA 35183 (256)249-9100

Cash Loans $1.75 lb. Pawn · Buy Farm Raised Sell · Trade “You Catch” Cat fish Guns · Tools Con fed er ate Elec tron ics Shirts, Caps Jew elry Belt Buck les All 6 flags

Knives · Ammo · Bumper Stick ers · Bev er ages · To bacco

Build ing erected in 1853LLOYD CAPERTON, Owner – CapeCSA1@aol.com

Trea surer, Al a bama League of the South

Com ing to gether is a be gin ning;keep ing to gether is prog ress;work ing to gether is suc cess.

– Henry Ford

EDITOR’S NOTE

Why did Sen a tor Harry Reid at tachan am nesty bill to the lat est de fensebill de feated last month, re mind ing us of Dem o crat sup port for am nesty sixweeks from the No vem ber elec tion?

The Dems and the mediacracy arein structed by their keep ers to play upB. O.’s phony Mohammedanism andact in sane, no dif fi cult as sign ment for ei ther wing of the fraudulent re gime,so that vot ers will flock to the pollsand re turn the outs back in. No rocket sci ence here.

a frac tion of what it did dur ing George’sday.

For six teen years the League of the Southhas stated there is vir tu ally no real dif fer encebe tween main stream con ser va tives andlib er als or be tween Re pub li cans andDem o crats. This lat est lit tle ex hi bi tiondem on strates that false di chot omy. Yes,both Al Sharpton and Glenn Beck have adream as did their heroes Lin coln andKing. But their dreams do not match andare at odds with the dream of the South ernpeo ple – to re store the prin ci ples of ourFound ing Fa thers!

Just an other ex am ple to show that themain stream brand of con ser va tism servedup by Glenn Beck and Sa rah Palin does n’tre ally con serve any thing ex cept so cial istgains from pre vi ous gen er a tions. Theirtalk of be lief in “lim ited gov ern ment” and“Con sti tu tional gov ern ment” is in sin cere

and hyp o crit i cal when they pay hom age tothe man who drove the nails into the cof finof our Con sti tu tional Re pub lic.

The Beck-Palin move ment will lurewell-mean ing but gull ible con ser va tives tothe same place the march ing band endedup in fol low ing the home com ing pa rade inthe movie “An i mal House” – down a blind, dead-end al ley.

If Beck-Palin con ser va tism does n’tap peal to you and you re ally don’t thinkyou be long in a milquetoast or ga ni za tionsuch as the GOP, then con sider the Leagueof the South. We think you might like ourun com pro mis ing stand for the prin ci plesupon which this coun try was founded anda real so lu tion to our prob lems – South ernin de pend ence.

Mi chael Hill and Mike Cranefor the League of the SouthBoard of Di rec tors

South ern Culturalism —

Na tional gun rights cham pionLarry Pratt is to ad dress the ThirdSouth ern Na tional Con gress.

THOMAS MOORE, Chair man of theSouth ern Na tional Con gress, informs usthat Larry Pratt, Ex ec u tive Di rec tor of Gun Own ers of Amer ica, will serve as key notespeaker at the Third South ern Na tionalCon gress con ven ing at Mont gom ery BellState Park near Dick son, Ten nes see, onNo vem ber 12-14, 2010. His ad dress to theSNC Del e gates, we are told, takes aim atthe prob lem/op por tu nity of “Amer ica inCri sis: a South ern So lu tion,” fo cus ing onour tra di tional South ern prin ci ples of Statesov er eignty, nul li fi ca tion and in ter po si tion as the only prac ti cal and peace ful so lu tionto fed eral en croach ments on lib er ties.

“We’re deeply hon ored to have LarryPratt as our key note speaker at the ThirdCon gress,” said Chair man Moore. “He hasmade Gun Own ers of Amer ica into themost ef fec tive and stead fast pro tec tor ofthe Sec ond Amend ment: the one right thatguar an tees all the oth ers. GOA is highlyre spected for its prin ci pled and un com pro -mis ing de fense of our right to keep andbear arms.

“GOA is smaller than some better-knowngun rights groups, but thanks to Larry Pratt it is a hun dred times more ef fec tive. Muchmore than an ex pert on gun free doms, he isa na tion ally re spected leader in the grow ingef fort to re store lim ited gov ern ment andthe rule of law, which, along with fire arms,safe guards all our free doms.”

2010 League Con ven tiondixienet.org

The League of the South is proud toan nounce that we will be hold ing our 17th

The At lanta Air port Hilton

Na tional Con fer ence on the8th and 9th of Oc to ber AD2010. The venue for ourgath er ing will be the At lanta Air port Hilton which iscon ve niently lo cated nearHartsfield-Jack son At lantaIn ter na tional Air port. Thead mis sion for both days ofthe event is only $50 perin di vid ual, $75 per cou pleand $100 per fam ily. We en cour age all topre-reg is ter now us ing your credit card orPayPal ac count.

Ac com mo da tions: The LoS has madear range ments with the Air port Hilton to set aside a block of rooms at a re duced grouprate of $99.00 per night for sin gle and

dou ble rooms. The re duced rate rooms areof fered on a first come first served bases,so we en cour age you to make res er va tions

as soon as pos si ble via phoneby di al ing 1-800-445-8667.Men tion to the op er a tor youwant to make res er va tions for the Air port Hilton in At lantaand take ad van tage of the“LOS” group dis count.

In for ma tion on ad di tionalac com mo da tion choices,speak ers list and con fer enceagenda will be posted on

DixieNet as they be come avail able.Cur rent sub scrib ers to our free emailnews let ter will be no ti fied of all changesvia the internet. If you are not cur rently anews let ter sub scriber, we en cour age you to take ad van tage of the con ve nience itof fers.

The First Free dom October 2010 5P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

SNC or ga nizes 2010 ren dez vous: this time in Ten nes see

GOA Ex ec u tive Di rec tor Larry Pratt

GOA is a non profitlob by ing or ga ni za tionthat was formed in1975 to pre serve theSec ond Amendmentrights of gun own ers.GOA, see ing fire armsown er ship as a free dom is sue, is not sat is fiedwith just de fend ing thesta tus quo. Amer i cans have lost many gunrights, and the GOA has taken to win ningthem back. This is why it’s con sid ered the“no com pro mise” gun lobby. From Stateleg is la tures and city coun cils to the UnitedStates Con gress and the White House,GOA rep re sents the views of gun own erswhen ever their rights are threat ened.

The South ern Na tional Con gress is theonly rep re sen ta tive as sem bly of South erncit i zens that pro vides an al ter na tive fo rumfor voic ing griev ances and re stor ing lib erty,jus tice, and pros per ity in the South ernStates. It of fers South ern ers a plat form toact in their in ter ests in ways no lon gerpos si ble with to day’s cor rupt po lit i calpro cess. The SNC seeks to re claim thegreat South ern prin ci ples of in di vid uallib erty and a small cen tral gov ern mentlim ited to its enu mer ated pow ers – that is,the ser vant, not the mas ter, of the sov er eign peo ple act ing through their re spec tiveStates. As these prin ci ples are con sis tentlyvi o lated by to day’s fed eral gov ern ment,de cent, hon or able peo ple who love lib ertymust ex er cise their sov er eignty and cre ateal ter na te in sti tu tions which speak and actfor them. This is why the SNC to day rises.

The First Con gress – the “Seed CornCon gress” – met De cem ber 2008 in NorthCarolina with 100 Del e gates. The Sec ondCon gress, the “Con gress of the Cov e nant,” gath ered Sep tem ber 2009 in Al a bama with150 Del e gates.

Chair man Moore now notes that, “Newap pli ca tions are pour ing in daily, and weex pect 300 Del e gates at the Third Con gressin Dick son, Ten nes see. We also look for anum ber of guests at the ban quet wanting tohear Larry Pratt, in clud ing the leg is la torswho spon sored Ten nes see’s re cent Statesov er eignty res o lu tion, lead ers of var i ouspro-free dom groups like the Cam paign forLib erty and Tea Party, lo cal gun-own ersand the news me dia.”

SNC’s rep re sented States are Al a bama,Ar kan sas, Florida, Geor gia, Ken tucky,

Lou i si ana, Mary land, Mis sis sippi,Mis souri, North Carolina, South Carolina,Ten nes see, Texas and Vir ginia. Res i dentsof these States who pos sess good char ac terare in vited to ap ply to be come Del e gates,with out re gard to race, sex, or creed. See:http://southernnationalcongress.org/delegateapplication.php .

Those in ter ested in learn ing moreabout the SNC should visit the website atwww.southernnationalcongress.org wherethey will find var i ous res o lu tions adoptedat the two pre vi ous ses sions, in clud ing theSouth ern Na tional Cov e nant and SNC’spow er ful new film, Amer ica in Cri sis: aSouth ern So lu tion, which may be seen athttp://sncspan.tv/AIC_video_fp.php .

News me dia are ad vised to con tactMr. D. R. “Doc” Smith of Ten nes see atpr@southernnationalcongress.org . Otherque ries about the SNC may be di rectedto Chair man Thomas Moore via email at:chair man@southernnationalcongress.org .

Thomas Moore’s appealIn the 11th Cen tury BC, the chil dren of

Is rael were sorely op pressed by the Baal-wor ship ing Midianites. But God raised upa cham pion, Gid eon, the sixth of the greatJudges of Is rael. No doubt you know thestory, one of the best-loved in the Bi ble,found in Chap ter 7 of the Book of Judges.With only 300 picked men, Gid eon routedthe vastly su pe rior army of Midian and itsal lies. Is rael lived in peace and lib erty forforty years, un til Gid eon passed on to hisfathers.

In 480 BC, a greatlyout num bered force ofGreek al lies held offthe in vad ing army ofXerxes and his Per siansat Thermopylae. Youknow that story, for thehe roic stand of the 300Spar tans who fought to the end is cel e brated in

re cent films and books like 300 and thebest-seller Gates of Fire. This hand ful ofGreek heroes changed the course of his tory,con trib ut ing to the ul ti mate de feat of thePer sians and en sur ing that free dom, notEast ern des po tism, pre vailed in the West.

Closer to our time and place, Gen eralFran cis Marion, the im mor tal “Swamp Fox”of Amer ica’s first War of In de pend ence,waged a dar ing par ti san cam paign againstBrit ish in vad ers in South Carolina, ty ingdown ten times his num ber of Brit ishReg u lars and in spir ing Pa triot re sis tance in the dark est days of Brit ish con quest. Hesel dom had more than 300 men un der arms at any one time, yet his light ning raids andam bushes were a de ci sive el e ment in thevic tory of Amer i can in de pend ence.

And now we South ern ers,in fact all Amer i cans, arefac ing threats to our lib erty,pros per ity and dig nity asdire as those our fore bearsover came in other times andplaces, theirs per haps worse. We of the South ern Na tionalCon gress, no less de ter minedto de feat the threats, will getto gether our own 300 heroeswith cour age and for ti tudeto meet to day’s chal lenges.

The Third Con gress will:

§ Con sider find ings and rec om men da tionsstem ming from the SNC Peo ples’ Fo rumsor town-hall meet ings con ducted by thevar i ous State Del e ga tions.§ De bate res o lu tions of fered from the

Floor and deemed in or der by the SNCBoard of Gov er nors.§ De bate a pre-drafted mea sure de clar ing

the United States Gov ern ment in breachof the fun da men tal so cial and po lit i cal

Mont gom ery Bell State Park, Dick son, Tennessee

con tract bind ing the sev eral States and thePeo ple to the re gime in Washington, DC.§ Elect new SNC of fi cers. If you’d like to

ex er cise your lead er ship on be half of theSouth ern cause and Peo ple, here is yourop por tu nity. (More de tails on of fices andelec tions are online at the SNC website.)§ New Del e gates may wish to af firm and

sign the South ern Na tional Cov e nantadopted by the Sec ond Con gress inSep tem ber 2009. See the Cov e nant at:www.southernnationalcongress.org/southernnationalcovenant.shtml.

This Third Con gress will be the mostim por tant yet – a high-pro file, high-im pact event that in cludes a sit-down ban quetSat ur day night with key note speaker LarryPratt.

Num bers by them selves are not the keyto vic tory; his tory is al ways made by thecom mit ted few. But 300 is a pow er fulnum ber, as his tory has proven; and we arequalifying 300 Del e gates. “Three Hun dred at the Third” will show con clu sively thatthe South ern Na tional Con gress has takenroot as a le git i mate South ern in sti tu tion,con firming our moral au thor ity to speakfor the South and her People.

The SNC of fers a unique op por tu nity tothose moved by a sense of ad ven ture andduty to work col lec tively with your fel lowSouth ern ers for lib erty, jus tice and thepros per ity of our be loved South land. Ifyou are such a per son and if you meet thequal i fi ca tions above, I hope you’ll plan tobe come a Del e gate and at tend the ThirdSouth ern Na tional Con gress on No vem ber12-14, 2010.

The Third Con gress con venes No vem ber12-14, 2010 at Mont gom ery Bell StatePark, near Dick son, Tennessee. The Park

has an ex cel lent cen tral lo ca tion for thosewho travel from out ly ing States. About 40min utes south west of Nash ville, it hasgood air con nec tions with the rest of thecoun try. (Nash ville Air port code is BNA.)

The Park en joys a beau ti ful set ting andam bi ance. Guest rooms have all the usualame ni ties. Based on dou ble oc cu pancy,rooms are ap prox i mately $78.00 per night,with tax. Meals in the on-site res tau rant are quite good and rea son ably priced.

As the many Del e gate ap pli ca tions nowcom ing in fore tell a large turnout, we havere served the en tire Inn for the SNC. Wewill post a link for res er va tions and info atwww.southernnationalcongress.org . Watchfor our no tice at this link and pre pare tore serve your place at the Third Con gressonce ap proved as a Del e gate. There are nore stric tions on race, creed, or sex – but:§ A Del e gate must reside in one of the 14

South ern States listed above.§ Minimum age is 18 when the Con gress

con venes on No vem ber 12, 2010.§ A Del e gate must af firm: I be lieve that I

have a duty to my home State. I be lieve that the South ern peo ple are a dis tinct peo ple. I be lieve in the right of voice, the right ofpres er va tion and the right of rec og ni tionfor the South and her peo ple.

Other qual i fi ca tions are re lated to thechar ac ter of the in di vid ual.

Please keep in mind that fi nal ap provalof Del e gates is up to each State Del e ga tion. Clearly, the SNC is not for ev ery one. Onlya spe cial few meet these qual i fi ca tions. Ifyou feel led to play a unique and his toriclead er ship role in the life of our South ernna tion in these chal leng ing times, wel come!

May God bless the South ern States andPeo ple.

6 The First Free dom October 2010P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

— Fight ing back —

Zi on ist myth-mak ers dis cover truth also has cham pi onsRead ers have won dered just who

is the cre ator of these phe nom e nalworks signed Deesillustration.com that sat u rate the internet, al low ing no one to sim ply walk away fromsuch cut ting sat ire with out at leastthink ing a bit on what’s be hind somany of to day’s co nun drums. Weasked him to en lighten us.

By Da vid Deesdavodees@hotmail.com

MY COMMERCIAL ART ca reer be gan in the wild and witty world of ad ver tis ingil lus tra tion. Among those many catchyprod uct ads con sum ers get bom bardedwith, well, I started out as an otherbone head paint ing just such for get ta bleim ages scream ing for a buyer’s at ten tion;and got pretty good at it, too, pro duc ingplenty of art that has of ten ap peared in theglut of mag a zines and news pa pers hav ingadorned news stands over the past 30 years.

This Dees il lus tra tion style has evolvedand gone through many phases since then,com pris ing the sort you see now – a modeof art that’s rather new. In Oc to ber 2006 Idashed off the first piece called “WorldWar W,” send ing it to Rense.com. Heposted that one right there for mil lions tosee, af ford ing a se ri ously great ve hi cle formy opin ions. Funny, un til then I had n’ttaken any real in ter est in pol i tics, cer tainlynot such po lit i cal fluff as dusted onto thegull ible pub lic by our fake nightly news.But 9/11 changed all of that in stantly,shak ing me hard, and I woke up.

Through this thing called the internet,an info tool that pro vides ac cess to mil lions of books and ar ti cles within sec onds, Ibe gan study ing his tory. Not the Zi on istcon trolled Wikipedia ver sion, mind you; Imean por ing through pho tos, vid eos, eye -wit ness ac counts and fo ren sic ev i dence,then de cid ing for my self what the true storyis. To day we ac cess vol umes of in for ma tioneas ily, in stantly flip ping through what used to take months of lug ging books around ina dark li brary, read ing texts heavily cen soredto pre vent any one from putt ing to gether atrue pic ture of what had re ally hap pened.It’s much eas ier for those who con trol theflow of in for ma tion to hide their crimesfrom pub lic view, but lately peo ple havegrown more alert to the truth be hind 9/11,facts prov ing the “of fi cial” story a to talhoax. As mov ies and books ex pose themyth of nine teen highjackers, by re writ inghis tory and cor rect ing those con trol lers’sick ver sion of the no to ri ous fa ble, I wantto help stop that hoax from evolv ing intofur ther trag e dies.

Set ting straight the his tor i cal re cord iscalled re vi sion ism. I am a re vi sion ist.

Peo ple ask how I come up with suchideas for my art. Here’s the deal. Tyr annyhav ing ar rived, world gov ern ment nowopenly an nounces it self. For eign bank ersrob us to the tune of tril lions; they threatenthe Bill of Rights, our Con sti tu tion andway of life, while di rect ing an il le git i mate,crim i nal Amer i can gov ern ment whosecourts ar rest any one, no due pro cess, andthen im pose in def i nite detentions.

Mind-al ter ing, can cer-caus ing flu o rideto day poi sons our drink ing wa ter, toxicchemtrails pol lute the skies, vac cines full ofhor rific, nerve-dis ease-in flict ing mer curyand alu mi num crip ple ba bies and chil dren.Those same bank sters steal our as sets byen gi neer ing fi nan cial col lapses. Shall I goon? They’re co or di nat ing this world wide.

We find our selves in a heap of trou ble.As through out his tory, sa dis tic con trol

freaks reach power and at tempt to build aworld em pire. They de stroy ba sic rightsand free doms in or der to re strain any one’sdis sent ing voice that may in spire peo ple toband to gether against them. My art issim ply a pro test, one man’s stand – hisloud, dis sent ing voice.

Cer tainly dan ger ac com pa nies cre at ingsuch art. How many ac tiv ists would sign

their names to an im age that ef fec tivelyfin gers ruth less kill ers, mur der ers andtor tur ers? I have done this even whilere call ing that in the old days kings andqueens sent their sol diers to es cort theguilty art ist off to rot in a dun geon. Thosetimes have re turned; look at the case ofErnst Zündel. The Zi on ists or dered himkid napped and “die sel therapied” throughthe prison sys tems of three coun tries, wherehe spent seven years be hind bars, hav ingdone noth ing more than ex press re vi sion ist opin ions – for a thought crime. That’s how

tyr anny works. Al though ar rest ing thosewho op pose them, as the glob al ists shutdown free speech their many meth ods ofat tack and in car cer a tion be come bla tant.Peo ple be gin sud denly wak ing up, but findthem selves al ready locked in shack les.

The super-wealthy, par a sitic elite lovethis pain and suf fer ing they’ve cre ated byde sign. Sim ply want ing peo ple to be comemis er a ble and die, they hate it that crowdscon tinue walk ing on the land they claim toown – their prop erty, their cit ies, theirplanet. And such ones want 90 per cent ofthe pop u la tion gone, re moved. They laughat our will ing ness to re main dom i nated,drugged and poi soned into sub mis sion. So, fol low ing all the art I’ve pro duced overthese last 30 years, now I’m paint ingthe most im por tant sub ject of a life time:our strug gle to break free of this bru talen slave ment.

The first step in combating their NewWorld Or der: like any threat en ing dis ease,we must re al ize there is a prob lem. Why do peo ple deny it’s hap pen ing; or, worse, liedown and take it? Suf fer ing from toxic,mind-numb ing chem i cals in their wa terand food, most of Zi on ism’s vic tims live ina haze of con fu sion, oc cu pied with thissick bal anc ing act be tween fi nan cial debtand mind-con trol ling television.

Many of us have friends and fam ily ei therto tally ig no rant of the en croach ing Po liceState or sim ply un will ing to ex am ine themoun tains of ev i dence. My il lus tra tionscut through that fog, en tic ing the viewer

to put to gether its pieces, fig ure out thepuz zle’s mes sage and then shift that se ri ousun der stand ing to one’s own dire sit u a tion.I’ve de signed this art work to deprogramthe zom bie in all of us.

Oc ca sion ally you will see a Jew ishsym bol with the let ter Z placed in myart. This sim ply rep re sents the po lit i calmove ment of Zi on ism, that most dis gust ing,creep ing can cer our world has ever known. Any one who stands up against theirout ra geous world em pire agenda getsbranded anti-Se mitic. Imag ine the gall, thenerve of this group, hav ing cre ated Is raelover the top of Pal es tine in 1948, thenmas sa cring, ter ror iz ing and driv ing thena tive Pal es tin ians into an open air prison,block ing food and wa ter, de stroy ing theircul ture, spit ting on them, openly steal ingtheir land and houses, their lives and theirfu ture – while brand ing any one who op posessuch crimes an “anti-Se mitic” who “justhates the Jews!” Watch ing this all go downis like be com ing trapped in a sick hor rormovie, while the Zi on ist-owned andcon trolled, to tally cen sored nightly newsavoids men tion ing such a mon strous crimeagainst de cency, com pas sion and hu man ity.Is rael and the sad, bru tal Zi on ists arein flict ing one thou sand per cent more

crimes on oth ers than their me dia re port.So those who brand me anti-Jew ish are

fools and frauds.I don’t care what re li gion you are, just

don’t hurt peo ple in the pro cess.

Back groundBoth my mother and fa ther come

orig i nally from the Deep South State ofMis sis sippi. We had a pol i ti cian in ourfam ily, Sen a tor John Stennis, my cousin.

He served in the Sen ate, rep re sent ingMis sis sippi for over 41 years start ing in1947, one of the most re-elected Sen a torsin Amer i can his tory. Such stay ing powercer tainly went along with the whole,cor rupt sys tem. He had the honor of see ingan air craft car rier named af ter him, theUSS John C. Stennis. What irony, this“man of peace” hav ing one of the larg estand most de struc tive weap ons of war everin flicted on earth sport ing his name, aNimitz-class nu clear-pow ered supercarrier.But John be longed to a dif fer ent era. Backthen Amer i cans re mained ever the goodguys, and peo ple could eas ily spot the badones. How times have changed!

Grow ing up in a nor mal fam ily, I sup pose,in a town just out side New Or leans, andob serv ing my fa ther, a pop u lar high schooland col lege level math e mat ics teacher,dab ble in his hob bies of pho tog ra phy,home movie film mak ing, model build ingand land scape oil paint ing, at five years ofage I clearly re mem ber watch ing himqui etly take an other blank can vas, plan,sketch and care fully paint a re al is tic snowscene, moun tain range or por trait. I foundthat stun ning to wit ness – like watch ing aslow mo tion magic show.

He would of ten ask for an opin ion,whether a tree or some shad ing he wasla bor ing on looked right, and that had itsef fect on me; he re ally val ued my think ing.In hind sight now, I re al ize that’s where thisabil ity be gan de vel op ing to make im agesread prop erly; he un know ingly nur turedsuch a ten dency. Later, when start ing todraw for my self and find ing it easy to lookat things then sketch them quite ac cu rately– nice skill to have, but it did n’t ex cite me.

Col lect ing box fuls of comic books andswept into a fan tasy car toon world jump ingoff the pages of Flash, Green Lan tern,Bat man, Spiderman and Sil ver Surfer,when the orig i nal campy Bat man TV showap peared I was thrilled and in awe. Nevermiss ing an is sue of MAD mag a zine,per haps my one true ed u ca tion, I loved also the James Bond mov ies plus those of El visand Tar zan, along with the Monkees TVshows. Each of my prod ucts re flects thefla vor of those in flu ences – a ka lei do scopeof crazed en ergy, col ors, hu mor, evil vil lainsand in dig nant sar casm. It’s all there.

While grow ing up be com ing good atthis ab stract sub ject called math e mat icsprob a bly be cause my fa ther lived, breathed and taught it, con sis tently near-per fect testscores in Al ge bra and Ge om e try won mesev eral awards and a schol ar ship to EmoryUni ver sity. How ever, soon dis cov er ing Iwas n’t all that smart, and cer tainly notcol lege wor thy, my idea for a ca reer inmed i cine faded fast. This same year atEmory re quir ing me to de cide on a newdi rec tion, while writ ing a psy chol ogy termpa per, a huge re al iza tion dawned that I was an art ist. Hav ing never known that be fore,now I be gan elatedly map ping out a whole

— Fight ing back — The First Free dom October 2010 7P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

new fu ture, know ing it the right onebe cause for the first time get ting fired up,power driven and full of ideas.

Af ter study ing the paint ings of sur re al ist Sal va dor Dali, one day at the Emory li braryfind ing an over sized book of Nor manRockwell’s art and sneak ing it out past theli brar ian, I kept it a whole year ex am in ingev ery page with amaze ment, and dreamedof learn ing to paint so well. A guiltycon science made me re turn that col lec tion,but in the mean time I had dis cov eredNor man Rockwell, eas ily the great estpo lit i cal and so cial art ist who ever lived.His il lus tra tions graced weekly Sat ur dayEve ning Post cov ers dur ing the 1930s, 40sand 50s, mas ter ful de pic tions that broughtto life the hap pi ness of liv ing the Amer i can dream: one’s love of coun try, bonds ofwork ing to gether, the hu mor of daily life,idyl lic fam i lies, fair pol i tics and re la tion shipsthat in spire peo ple.

And now, af ter all these years, I haveun be liev ably re ceived a num ber of emailsfrom fans say ing they con sider me the 21stCen tury’s new Nor man Rockwell. That’ssuch a crack-up I just have to smile, forthey must mean a Nor man Rockwell onacid, ha, ha, one you might call “Night mareRockwell” – he who il lus trates ev ery thingthat has gone hor ri bly wrong with Amer ica.My ObamaCare wait ing room piece, forin stance, re flects a huge in flu ence from the great man for sure.

Leav ing Emory and en roll ing in therep u ta ble Art In sti tute of At lanta, Ien coun tered art ists pos sess ing un godlyabil i ties far be yond mine. But, funny thing, un able to draw so well, my forté re mainedcom po si tion and an un der stand ing of color,plus I had drive: far more im por tant thanjust raw nat u ral tal ent. Look at the great estcre ative peo ple; they aren’t al ways thosewith the best sing ing voices or pret ti estfaces, but the ones who have an un dy ingbe lief in them selves and that un stop pa blede sire to cre ate what ever their art, whichcar ries them for ward un til they can fig ureout the tech ni cal points, some times per hapsby just re de fin ing the con cept of “pretty.”

Af ter sit ting in art school for only a yearand a half I de cided to get out and fol lowmy ner vous de ci sion into the real world.Lo cat ing the top art stu dio in town – wheresat by far the hot test and most pro fes sionalil lus tra tors, an air brush ing car toon Mecca– I walked in and got re jected to tally.Re turn ing a year later with a new port fo lio, they turned me down again. Crushed andscared, re group ing and work ing all theharder on my port fo lio, third time charmtime, they fi nally hired me, un der scor ingthat im por tant les son about per sis tencepay ing off; keep push ing and one day thedoor will open. Soon I was strug gling tostay up along side very com pe tent andcom pet i tive art ists, work ing long hours ina fast-paced sweat shop il lus tra tion stu dio.

Early on, my great est pas sion in volvedpains tak ingly de tail ing some fast foodfran chise’s wacky cheese burger il lus tra tionor ink ing bill board art for Ford’s new estmodel Mus tang. Maybe it was the air brushpaint fumes, or the stress of im pos si blytight dead lines, but I thrived on it and spent three years in that hell of a boot camp,com ing out the other side with proof thatI’ve a bit of tal ent af ter all. Al though in thenext ten years cre at ing il lus tra tions for somebig ad ver tis ing agen cies, the truth is Inever got to sign my name to a sin gleone of those pieces. That’s the re al ity ofcom mer cial art, there’s an art to it but in the end it’s sim ply a prod uct.

In the eight ies tak ing off for LosAn geles, no easy mar ket to crack, I luckedupon a great agent and jumped intocre at ing ad cam paigns for B mov ies andvid eos, which paid the bills while work ingmy way up. Start ing a free lance stu dio andget ting to work with Geffen Re cords, alsoPar a mount Home Video – do ing a num berof store dis plays for their sum mer mov ieslike Fri day the 13th, Beverly Hills Copand Wayne’s World – then, of all things,il lus trat ing the orig i nal cover forPar a mount’s three-vol ume ho lo caust videodoc u men tary called Shoah, which at thetime I thought such an honor (more on thatlater), this brought me up to the early 90swhen sud denly the dig i tal age of com put ersand de sign ing pho to graphs with Photoshopap peared. Air brush ing the old-fash ionedway was over night gone; I quickly foundmy self ob so lete, un em ployed and out of an agent.

Scram bling to find a new di rec tion, Iturned to dig i tal art, got a com puter andbe gan il lus trat ing chil dren’s mag a zines,vid eos, books and toy pack ages, a mar ketwhere air brushed car toons had sur vived.Though find ing it a kick to work with myheroes in the busi ness, Dis ney, HannaBarbera and Warner Bros., I only got theirsmaller pro jects, no big stuff; seemed thebig name il lus tra tors had those stu dios sortof locked in. Af ter do ing about a hun dredvideo cov ers for an i mated car toons withcli ents like Live Home Video, where realcre ative ness came into play, I got a callfrom Ses ame Street Work shop and endedup paint ing a mil lion Cookie Mon sters,Elmos and Big Birds, lots of feath ers andfur for the mag a zine which fea tured mywacky ver sions of those char ac ters al mostev ery month for 12 years, even on thecover seven times. Also il lus trat ing five oftheir chil dren’s books, I loved the cra zi ness and good-hearted fun of it all, think ingthose Ses ame Street years my max i mumachieve ment. But lit tle did I know.

My free lance stu dio sur vived through2000, when all at once the un fore seen,shock ing event of 9/11 de stroyed this good feel ing. In Los An geles watch ing the storyon TV when those build ings col lapsed, I

be lieved whole heart edly the of fi cial line,as did most peo ple at that moment.

But eventually I be gan hav ing a vis ceralre ac tion to 9/11. The party was over. Iwanted out of LA, off the planet, and grewplenty up set and dis trust ful. In a trulyin spired de ci sion I moved to Swe den in2003, seek ing love and hap pi ness in a safe,clean en vi ron ment. Trees, lakes and nicepeo ple re ally have a way of bright en ing my day.

Then I had a big cli ent prob lem whenmega cor po ra tion con glom er ate TimeWarner bought out Ses ame Work shop andfired ev ery sin gle per son, the en tire staffex cept for one per son: the Zi on ist Jew ished i tor whom I was best bud dies with. I gotthe whole story from her first hand; sheex pressed con fu sion as to why her jobhad n’t also van ished, and, al though at thattime not yet hav ing learned about Zi on ism, the rea son she did n’t get the ax has sincebe come ob vi ous to me.

In 2003 while study ing pho tos of thePen ta gon at tack, I un cov ered the truthbe hind 9/11. That rocked my whole viewof the world. In stantly hooked on know ingev ery thing about 9/11, dis cov er ing how tore search the sub ject and find out the truthfor my self, I dove into the pro ver bial rab bit hole, dig ging ever deeper into that hid denun der belly of sin is ter, se cret so ci et ies: theilluminati, Zi on ists, the Rothschilds andtheir whole bevy of gov ern ment pup petsdo ing the dirty work.

Why had I not known all this be fore?How could any one have been so blind?

Voic ing these new opin ions about Is raeland the Zi on ists with my Ses ame Street art, they sent me a warn ing to stop. Of course Iig nored them, and got ter mi nated. This ishow they keep peo ple quiet: speak out andyou’re gone. Artists who want the workdon’t open their mouths. Time Mag a zineFor Kids, an other big cli ent – no more. Infact, I soon re al ized that Zi on ists owned allthe en ter tain ment and pub lish ing housesand they had blacklisted me.

What irony! All of my years de sign ingfor big cor po ra tions had trained an artmon ster who would now turn his cre ativepower back against those very cor ruptmain stream media.

Wow. I found my self again out of work.Luck ily the al ter na tive me dia of fered awhole new au di ence. Af ter dis cuss ing mysit u a tion with Jeff Rense, he helpedtre men dously by pro mot ing my work onhis site and hav ing me on his ra dio show.In tro duced to a whole new cli ent base ofgor geous peo ple, do ing art for healthprod ucts, in de pend ent au thors with newpo lit i cal and fi nance books, all the things Inow am in ter ested in, I find things look ingup.

How ToPer haps I should de scribe the pro cess by

which I do this art. It starts with a con ceptor sub ject, which is easy; usu ally talk ra diospends a whole hour on a par tic u lar sub ject,

and lis ten ing to the ex changes cre atesim ages in the mind. The trick is know inghow to de sign them into an il lus tra tion,a sin gle im age. How do I man age that?Im pos si ble to de scribe: how can a songwriter clar ify where a mel ody co mes from,ex cept by say ing that it just pops into hishead?

This is prob a bly where my back groundin math e mat ics co mes handy. In ge om e trywe took a big equa tion, such as in reallife would equate to a con fus ing worldsit u a tion, then found the known vari ables,which gave us the an swer to the un known,x = 55 or some thing. That is just aboutwhat I do with this art, boil down all itssignificances into a sim pler un der stand ingof the sit u a tion, which in a sense of fers theso lu tion. Hav ing re duced a com plex ity toits el e ments, the viewer can then betterun der stand his prob lem – see ing its causerather than just the ef fect. Any one whofeels vic tim ized cer tainly un der stands only the ef fect, but upon grasp ing a prob lem can be gin ac tions to re solve it.

Sim ply put, it is a thought pro cess suchas tak ing 9/11, or vac cines, and re duc ingthat sub ject to three or four of its ba siccom po nents and show ing their re la tion ship – usu ally op pos ing forces – which makes it more in ter est ing. Work ing it out in my headbe fore start ing on the art, once grasp ing the sub ject mat ter and col lect ing the puz zle’spieces, I move them around in my mindlike re ar rang ing a liv ing room. Put the chairover there, no, here; then turn the ho ri zonline or bend its per spec tive to pro vide more drama, keep ing the en ergy level high andgiv ing it stress.

I can tell you that all of this is done inPhotoshop, and very ba sic. Real Photoshopart ists are ap palled by the sloppy art I putto gether. Un der stand ing only fun da men tallay er ing and air brush ing tech niques, neverhav ing taken a class in this, and about 75per cent of the but tons and tools I don’teven know what they do, this involvesnoth ing more than find ing pho to graphs onthe internet, cut ting them up and care fullyre ar rang ing the whole into a mon tage thattells the story. Try ing to avoid la bel ing orcap tions, I pre fer to let the im ages talk forthem selves.

As a kid I al ways opened the Sundayfunny pa pers and went di rectly to thosestrips hav ing no cap tions at all – the mostin ter est ing to fig ure out. I keep it the samewith my po lit i cal art, ex cept oc ca sion allywhen ne ces sity de mands one, a para graphof text along side the pho to graphs. Like asmall doc u men tary.

I find my self very hap pily ar rived at thispoint, my art snow ball roll ing down the hill gain ing speed and grow ing ever big ger. It’s so cool re ceiv ing emails from folks all over the globe in re sponse to these po lit i calgibes – in cred i ble new friends show er inglove on me, when I used to feel so lost inthis strug gle and all alone. Thanks forbeing there.

— Reaching —8 The First Free dom October 2010P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

The hy po thet i cal case against At tor ney Ed gar SteeleThe ZOG wants to turn loose its

crim i nal ac com plice – in for mantLarry Fairfax – while keep ing theme dia-con victed vic tim locked up.

By Mark Farrellhonestmediatoday.com

When did the case against Ed gar Steele,Juris Doc tor, be gin? If you’re like mostpeo ple, you may say the last sev eral weeks. How ever, af ter a closer ex am i na tion of thefacts, it un doubt edly be gan quite sometime ago. Per haps the gov ern ment firststarted to scru ti nize his ac tiv i ties when hedared to rep re sent Aryan Na tions, in thecase where the or ga ni za tion was bank -rupted for what one of its mem bers did(though such or ga ni za tions like the ADLwould never suf fer sim i lar re pri sals if oneof its mem bers – let’s say Ber nard Madoffor Meyer Lansky – il le gally made off withbil lions of dol lars, which was shared withthe or ga ni za tion). Or, maybe, the caseagainst Steele be gan the day when heof fered some as sis tance to Rev. Dr. MattHale, who was un justly im pris oned for agov ern ment agent say ing that he – theagent – wanted to com mit a crime (eventhough he did n’t), and although Rev. Dr.Hale dis tinctly said that he wanted no partof it. The gov ern ment could as well havebeen look ing for any thing even re motelyin crim i nat ing – no mat ter if con jured up insome sort of fic tional re al ity re sem blingAl ice in Won der land – when Steele’sfor mer Jew ish law part ner concertedlyworked to de stroy Steele’s le gal prac ticesome time ago. Cer tainly, the case againstSteele be gan, at the lat est, when hepub lished his book, De fen sive Rac ism – awork that dared to re veal cer tain facts thatsome peo ple in the gov ern ment wouldpre fer best left alone. While it may bedif fi cult to dis cern when, ex actly, thegov ern ment de cided to de stroy the life ofan at tor ney whose great est “crime” is, inac tu al ity, tell ing the truth, it is not hard tosee the gross in jus tices oc cur ring againsthim, as with ev ery other pro-White ac tiv istwith which the gov ern ment has dealt.

To make cer tain that Steele suf fersun duly harsh pun ish ment forbe ing a pro-White ac tiv ist, thegov ern ment’s agents, froth ingat the mouth with un ri valed joyin his tor ment, de cided to raidhis home, re port edly tear ing upfloor boards, putt ing holes inthe wall, mak ing it com pletelyun liv able. The fam ily’s valu ableswere re port edly taken from theirhome. Fur ther com pound ingmat ters, the gov ern ment hasseized all his as sets, pre vent inghim from ob tain ing ad e quate le gal de fenseon his be half. The gov ern ment has at tempted to pit Steele’s wife against him in a bi zarrelycon trived plot that would have madeJo seph Sta lin blush, though there is lit tledoubt that such tac tics were de rived fromthe for mer So viet Un ion.

So, what hap pened here in Steele’scase? While all the cards are not on theta ble – and you can be cer tain that thegov ern ment will no doubt keep much ofthe deck hid den (at least those cards thatmight oth er wise prove Steele’s in no cence)in an ef fort to per se cute an other pro-Whiteac tiv ist – we can glean much from whathas been shown thus far.

Steele, grow ing older and find ing itmore dif fi cult to main tain his prop erty,hav ing had some ma jor heart is sues justlast year, had re port edly been hir ing ahandy man to do odd jobs. He met a man by the name of Larry Fairfax, who did n’tseem to want too much money for oddjobs. Cer tainly, work ing as a handy manwas an im prove ment from the life time offast-food res tau rants that Fairfax had beenac quainted with, and he did n’t need to ask,“Do you want fries with that?” – at leastwhen he had work to do.

Lit tle did Steele know, but his handy man

Larry Fairfax had long been work ing forthe gov ern ment, work ing un der cover tohelp with drug busts. Many of these drugin for mants like such jobs for two rea sons:They use il le gal drugs in dis crim i natelybe cause they’re work ing un der cover, andthey get paid for it. It is not known whoap proached whom; but, much like TonyEvola, the life time fry-cook who was paidroughly $40K to in crim i nate Rev. Dr. MattHale, some where down the line Fairfaxwas prob a bly of fered some money if hecould take Steele down.

But, how would Fairfax do it? Imag inethis: Fairfax started think ing one day, andin stead of us ing his in tel lect to bust drugdeal ers and flip bur gers, he de cided tofab ri cate a re corded con ver sa tion be tweenhim self and Steele. He would get paid bythe gov ern ment for that. Then, he couldsnatch Steele’s money too. As many peo ple knew from Ed gar Steele’s on line speeches(prob a bly Fairfax in cluded), he talkedof ten about how he was ac cu mu lat ingpre cious met als such as gold and sil ver toweather this cur rent na tional de pres sionwhich the gov ern ment has so el o quentlycalled a slight down turn.

So, all Fairfax would have to do wouldbe to fake some com ments by Steele. Thisis n’t the stuff out of sci ence fic tion spynov els any more; any 12-year-old can do itif he tries. Plus, it’s not ex pen sive ei ther.Even if you don’t have a com puter, you can sim ply go to the li brary, and com putermi cro phones cost only a few dol lars.

Let me just give you an idea as to howeasy it is to fab ri cate a speech, par tic u larlyin Ed gar Steele’s case. Now, Steele has anon line show called “Nickel Rant,” as many peo ple know. Re corded from there arelit er ally doz ens of MP3s of his speak ing.You can down load Steele’s MP3s, in sertthem into the Au dio Ed i tor, and splice anddice them up. All you need is an au dioed i tor, and that can be found free on line.You can go to www.AVSmedia.com forex am ple and get a free trial pro gram ofAVS Au dio Ed i tor, as I did. It’s ac tu ally apretty nice lit tle pro gram.

AVS Me dia – Could Fairfax have used

Mrs. Cyndi Steele

At tor ney Ed gar Steele

this pro gram to make bo guscon ver sa tions?

In or der to prove just howin cred i bly easy this is to al tersome MP3 files, within aboutan hour – in clud ing the time todown load the pro gram, in stalland fig ure out how it works,then down loading and ed it ingSteele’s MP3s my self – I wasable to make a brief, bo gusin ter view with Ed gar Steele byre cord ing my voice and then

cut ting out words and let ters that he hadsaid in his MP3s.

You can lis ten to my bo gus in ter viewwith At tor ney Ed gar Steele, ask ing himabout this par tic u lar case and Fairfax, atwww.honestmediatoday.com/SteeleInterview.mpa . While the au dio-clip may not beper fect, I did n’t re ally want to spend a lotof time pro duc ing it ei ther. I could make itsound a lot better if I wanted to spend thetime, yet you’ll have to ad mit that it doesin fact sound like I’m hav ing an ac tualcon ver sa tion with Mr. Steele.

Now, imag ine tak ing these au dio snip pets and get ting alit tle au dio player. You thenplay that au dio file while youhave an other de vice to re cord – in Fairfax’s case, play ingthe sound clip to a “bug.”Any static, doors clos ing,wind, etc., would ob vi ouslybe in cluded in back groundnoise. If Fairfax did that, thegov ern ment might not evenhave been aware of what wasoc cur ring; the gov ern menttruly could have been dupedhere, though that’s dif fi cult to say at this point. Oth ers have

sug gested Fairfax could’ve used a pro gram like Voice Changer Soft ware Di a mond 7.0, www.audio4fun.com/voice-over.htm – the one that claims it can “mimic the voice ofany person.”

Still, even if Fairfax’s plan to put Ed garSteele in jail by us ing bo gus sound-clipswas suc cess ful, Fairfax might have fig ured that Ed gar’s wife would get wise to whatwas oc cur ring, par tic u larly if Ed gar’spre cious met als dis ap peared. Pos si bly, inor der to pre vent that, a bomb was plantedun der neath Steele’s wife’s car by Fairfax.A real pipe bomb; and, it was mounted tothe ex haust pipe, which ev ery one knowsgets ex tremely hot – per haps hot enough toig nite it if driven long enough.

Think about this: Fairfax was pro vid ingthese au dio-clips to the gov ern ment thatsug gested Ed gar Steele wanted to have hiswife killed. If Steele’s wife and mother-in-law had sud denly died and Ed gar were injail, not only would Fairfaxget paid by the gov ern mentfor be ing their star wit ness(prob a bly quite a sum, see ingas how Ed gar Steele had been an irritant to many aris to cratsin the gov ern ment), but hecould in ad di tion gain plentyof time to loot all the gold and sil ver from Cyndi and Ed garSteele’s household.

Prob a bly when Fairfax saw Mrs. Steeletake off in her car he de cided it was histime to pull the plan to gether. As Ed garSteele has noted in a let ter from prisonal ready:

“My hill billy handy man stum bledacross a stash of sil ver bul lion in one of myout build ings – then searched and foundtwo oth ers ($15,000 and $45,000 to tal).

Know ing I would dis cover the theft andknow it was him. He tried to kill me withtwo pipe bombs he placed on the cars heknew I drove. They both failed to go off.Cyndi left town with one be fore here moved it, which led to the dis cov ery ofthe car bomb on our Mitsubishi SUV.”

Of course, given the na ture of ourcur rent gov ern ment and what has oc curredso far with Steele, it’s also con ceiv able that Fairfax was paid by the gov ern ment tomur der the Steeles, and the gov ern ment isnow try ing to cover it all up since themur der plot was un cov ered.

The gov ern ment has re port edly taken all the Steeles’ as sets (thereby keep ing Ed garSteele from us ing his own money in hisde fense) and ripped out their home’sfloor boards and tore up their walls.

And Fairfax was n’t even charged withat tempted mur der – let alone for ter ror ismand bomb-mak ing. To me, that sounds like

an ad mis sion of gov ern mentcom plic ity in the at temptedmur der of the Steeles. Whyelse would n’t Fairfax be triedfor at tempted mur der if he wasthe one plant ing ex plo sives? In fact, he was only charged withhav ing pos ses sion of il le gal,home-made fire arms – thougha pipe-bomb is hardly a gun.

Added to that, Fairfax’s sen tence is n’t tobe im posed un til af ter the Steele trial – sothe gov ern ment is pretty much dan glinghim like a fish with a hook caught inhis mouth. Un doubt edly, Fairfax will saywhat ever he thinks the gov ern ment wouldwant him to say in an ef fort to keep fromgo ing back to jail – where he and someof his gov ern ment co horts un doubt edlybe long for these at tempted mur ders of the

Steeles.What’s to come of such a

con spir acy? Shall the truthpre vail in this case? Or willthe gov ern ment’s at temptedmur derer Larry Fairfax es capejus tice? If you can help out,even with only a few dol lars,please make a do na tion to theSteeles. See www.free-ed gar- steele.com to learn moreabout this case and make anon line contribution. Or senda di rect do na tion to Ed gar’swife Cyndi:

Cyndi G. SteeleP. O. Box 1255Sagle, ID 83860

By Chris tine Millercbmiller.com

I al ways ac com pa nied my hus band to hismeet ings and con fer ences, but I never took abook along. I knew that on the night ta ble ofev ery ho tel there would be a Bi ble, put thereby the Gid eon Club. Since from child hood Iwas fa mil iar with all the sto ries and par a blesof the New Tes ta ment I im mersed my self inthe Old Tes ta ment. No body would ben e fitmore from a like wise im mer sion than the“Born again” Chris tians, alias the Chris tianZi on ists. That group seems to know, and isbe holden to, only one sen tence taken fromthe Old Tes ta ment: “Who ever blesses Is rael,will be blessed by God.”

Ev ery body knows the story of Da vid andGo li ath. But who re mem bers the fol low ingep i sode? “Da vid thought to him self, ‘One ofthese days I will be de stroyed by the hand ofSaul. The best thing I can do is to es cape tothe land of the Philistines’... So Da vid andthe six hun dred men with him left and wentover to Achish son of Maoch king of Gath.Now Da vid and his men went and raided theGeshurites, the Girzites and the Amalekites.When Achish asked, ‘Where did you goraid ing to day?’ Da vid would say, ‘Againstthe Negev of Ju dah’ or ‘Against the Negevof Jerahmeel’ or ‘Against the Negev of theKenites.’ He did not leave a man or a womanalive to be brought to Gath, for he thought,They might in form on us and say, ‘This iswhat Da vid did.’ And such was his prac ticeas long as he lived in Philistine ter ri tory.Achish trusted Da vid and said to him self,

KING DAVID AND THE U.S.S. LIBERTY:

Ly ing co mes easy for those well prac ticed in the art

‘He has be come so odi ous to his peo ple, theIs ra el ites, that he will be my ser vant for ever.’”(I Sam uel 27). The Old Tes ta ment con tainsnot a word of con dem na tion against Da vidfor this treach ery, and the abuse of kingAchish’s hos pi tal ity.

Does that re mind you of some thing ? Itshould, namely the Is raeli at tack in 1967 onour ship, the USS Lib erty. The Is rae lis meantto sink that ship with all men and mice onboard. They shot to smith er eens the life boats which the crew of the Lib erty had launched.The sink ing of this ship was meant to beblamed on Egypt. Let me re peat: Da vid didnot leave a man or a woman alive, for hethought, They might in form on us and say:‘This is what Da vid did.’ But the ship made it back with 34 dead and over one hun dred andsev enty wounded. Sur vi vors of the Lib ertywere not al lowed to say – un der threat ofcourt mar tial – “This is what the Is rae lis did.”

Amer i can Air planes sta tioned in It alyhad taken off in or der to come to the res cue.The planes were re called on high est or ders,namely by Pres i dent John son and Sec re taryMcNamara. I now leave facts be hind andven ture into spec u la tion. Did John son knowsome thing about the mur der of Pres i dentKen nedy? Could the Is raeli gov ern mentblack mail him? One thing is cer tain. Un derJohn son, Ken nedy’s Amer i can pol icy to wardsIs rael and the whole Mid dle East wasre versed and the U. S. be came what it is now,a patsy for Is rael. Whose bread I eat, whosesong I sing. Is rael is eat ing our bread and weare sing ing their song. What a per ver sion!

Or der Chris tine Miller’s Re al ity Check on page 23

The First Free dom October 2010 9P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

— Ju di cial tyranny —

LOST RIGHTS, PART 8:

The right to con tract (or not)By Lt. Col o nel Don ald Sullivan (Ret)

aloe910@aol.com

The U. S. Con sti tu tion states in Ar ti cleI, Sec tion 10, that “No Stateshall...pass any law...im pair ingthe ob li ga tion of con tracts…”Some claim that this clause isplaced in the Con sti tu tion topro tect con tracts pre-ex ist ingthe Rev o lu tion ary War so thatthe King’s con tracts with thePope stayed in ef fect. Be that as it may, the Su preme Court ofthe United States (SCOTUS) has ruled there sult of Ar ti cle I, Sec tion 10, is that wehave this con sti tu tion ally granted right,in di vid u ally, to con tract or not con tract as a part of our “free dom.”

Hav ing a right gives us theabil ity to waive that right, by not de mand ing it timely orby “sign ing” it away. For aright to be law fully signedaway, we must per form theact vol un tarily – of our freewill – with full and in formedcon sent.

But who says gov ern ment op er a tives act in a “law ful” man ner? They don’t. Mostly,due to ig no rance on the part of low-levelagents and bu reau crats (and our own, ofcourse), we are called upon to ap ply forsuch li censes and per mits as vir tu allyelim i nate ev ery right. Once we do that, theright con verts into a reg u lated priv i lege(ben e fit) by the con tract we have signed,bind ing us to reg u la tion. Once we ac cept agov ern ment ben e fit, how ever in sig nif i cant,they’ve got us.

On Sep tem ber 16, 2010, I filed a brief to the SCOTUS on my right to travel as a partof lib erty. Much of the brief had to do withthe State of North Carolina’s lack of anycon trac tual re la tion ship with me whichwould have caused my right to lib erty to be waived. It is a mat ter of re cord that nei ther this State nor the United States pro videsme with any ben e fit, pen sion, healthcare,en ti tle ment or sub sis tence of any kind. Iam not a reg is tered voter. I no lon ger havea so cial se cu rity num ber. There exists nocon tract be tween me and the State or theUnited States into which I have en teredvol un tarily of my free will with knowl edge and in formed con sent, and that in cludes adriver’s li cense. I was threat ened with jailby the Sher iff of Pen der County if caughttrav el ing with out a li cense. I also need oneto op er ate a “mo tor ve hi cle,” a rental carfor in stance. All my prop erty is owned bybill of sale. I did not threaten any one’srights with my au to mo bile. There fore, noju ris dic tional nexus ex ists for the State toex er cise “po lice power” au thor ity over me. Fur ther, I have not vol un tarily granted anyju ris dic tion, other than special jurisdictionfor appeals, and have waived no rights.

The con nec tion be tween ben e fits andthe “po lice power” is shown in Wickard v.Filburn, 317 U. S. 111, 63 S. Ct 82 (1942),and oth ers:

“[T]he im por tance of ac cept ing oran tic i pat ing ben e fits from the State can bevery costly to one’s pro tected rights. Wecan hardly find a de nial of due pro cess inthese cir cum stances, par tic u larly since itis even doubt ful that ap pel lee’s bur densun der the pro gram out weigh his ben e fits. It is hardly lack of due pro cess for theGov ern ment to reg u late that which itsub si dizes.” (Em pha sis mine).

But, as I stated above, our ig no rance ofthe law and our rights gets the best of us“...be cause of what ap pears to be a law fulcom mand on the sur face, many cit i zens,be cause of their re spect for what onlyap pears to be law, are cun ningly co ercedinto waiv ing their rights due to ig no rance.The priv i lege [Note they cun ningly call aright a priv i lege] against self-in crim i na tion

[or any right] is nei ther ac corded to thepas sive re sis tant, to the per son who isig no rant of his rights, nor to one who is

in dif fer ent thereto. It is afight ing clause. Its ben e fits canbe re tained only by sus tainedcom bat. It can not be claimed by at tor ney or so lic i tor. It is validonly when in sisted upon by abel lig er ent claim ant in per son.” U. S. v. Mincker, 350 U. S. 179,p. 187.

So, what grants the State“po lice power” over my pri vate prop ertyau to mo bile re quir ing that it be “reg is tered” and tagged with the State when used solelyfor my own pri vate travel? The an swer:“There is no such grant.” Thus, I needn’treg is ter my au to mo bile with the State solong as not us ing it on the pub lic way forcom merce.

A con trac tual re la tion ship must ex istfor the cor po rate State of North Carolina to ex er cise ju ris dic tion over me. This fact oflaw is no better il lus trated than by the“Clearfield Trust Doc trine”:

“Gov ern ments de scend to the level of amere pri vate cor po ra tion, and take on thechar ac ter is tics of a mere pri vate cit i zen…[w]here pri vate cor po rate com mer cial pa per[Fed eral Re serve Notes] and se cu ri ties[checks] is con cerned… For pur poses ofsuit, such cor po ra tions and in di vid u als arere garded as en ti ties en tirely sep a rate fromgov ern ment.” Clearfield Trust Co. v. UnitedStates, 318 U.S. 363-371 (1942).

In other words, when pri vate com mer cialpa per is used by cor po rate gov ern ment,then Gov ern ment loses its sov er eigntysta tus. As such, gov ern ment then be comesbound by the rules and laws that gov ernpri vate cit i zens, mean ing that if they in tend

to com pel an in di vid ual to some spe cificper for mance based upon its cor po ratestat utes or cor po ra tion rules, such asve hi cle reg is tra tion or li a bil ity in sur ance,then the gov ern ment, like any pri vatecit i zen, must be the holder in due course ofa con tract or other com mer cial agree mentbe tween it and the one upon whom de mandsfor spe cific per for mance are made. Thegov ern ment must be will ing to en ter thecon tract or com mer cial agree ment intoev i dence be fore try ing to get the court toen force its de mands, called stat utes.

At all times rel e vant to the mat ter of mycase, I had not know ingly nor vol un tarilywith full dis clo sure availed my self of anyben e fit from North Carolina which wouldplace me un der the ju ris dic tion of theState’s stat utes noted; and there was noinjured party.

Un less an en tity has be come a part of the cor po rate State by vol un tarily of his ownfree will ac cept ing a li cense (con tract) andbe ing sub ject to it, no cor po rate pol icy(stat ute) has any au thor ity against thaten tity, sav ing ac tions of that en tity againstthe sa cred rights of oth ers so pos sessed.

If one has not vol un tarily of his ownfree will “availed” him self of any ben e fitfrom, or is not in, or of, any of fice ofgov ern ment and, in other words, sub ject tothe ad min is tra tive laws of said cor po rategov ern ment, then he is a pri vate cit i zenand a part of the pri vate sec tor, not un derstat u tory ju ris dic tion. (See Hale v. Hinkle,201 U. S. 43, at R. p. 27).

Where a con trac tual re la tion ship ex istsbe tween the State and the in di vid ual, therealso re sides ju ris dic tion, al though lim itedbased upon the terms. How ever, where nocon tract ex ists, there is no ju ris dic tion.“Party can not be bound by con tract that he

has not made or au tho rized.” Al ex an der v.Bosworth (1915), 26 C.A. 589, 599, 147P.607. There fore: “Fail ure to re veal thema te rial facts of a li cense or any agree ment is im me di ate grounds for estoppel.” LoBue v. Porazzo, 48 Cal. App. 2d 82, 119,p. 2d 346, 348. The the ory of fraud u lently“pre sumed” quasi-con tracts that al leg edlybind us with State agency is void for fraudab in itio, since the de facto State can notpro duce the ma te rial fact (con sid er ationin duce ment) or the ju ris dic tional clause(who is sub ject to said stat ute). (See:Mas ter/Ser vant [Em ployee] Re la tion ship– C.J.S. – “ Pri vate, Lib erty”).

Since “con sid er ation” is the “lifeblood”of any agree ment or quasi agree ment,(con tract) “…ab sence of such from there cord is a ma jor man i fes ta tion of want ofju ris dic tion since with out ev i dence ofcon sid er ation there can be no pre sump tionof even a quasi-contractus.” Such is theim por tance of a “con sid er ation,” read ingR. R. Co. v. John son,7 W & S (Pa.) 317.So, with out valid, vol un tary, fully in formed,will ing par tic i pa tion in an agree ment/con tract or con sid er ation, there is noDMV/gov ern ment, etc., ju ris dic tion as theprop erty does not “re side” in the colorablefic ti tious ter ri tory oc cu pied by Stateau thor ity. There is a right to con tract anda right not to con tract. I have cho sen notto con tract with the State. There is noju ris dic tion granted. The State’s ac tionsagainst me, to force me to in sure andreg is ter my pri vate prop erty au to mo bile,are un con sti tu tional.

But that and $3.00 might buy me a cupof Joe at Starbucks, be cause “Ev ery bodyknows you must have a per mit to ex er cise a right in this Marx ist/So cial ist Coun try.”

Next Month – “Right to a Grand Jury”

IN SOME PARTS OF THE WORLD THEY’RE CATCHING ON:

For eign aid pro mot ing cor rup tionPub lished two months ago in the

Dalit Voice of In dia, here’s proofthat our do-goodism is de stroy ingnot just our selves but the world.

By Dr. Bharat Jhunjhunwalabharatj©sanchamet.in

dalitvoice.org

The Brit ish Gov ern ment has or dered anin quiry into cor rup tion in Sarva SikshaAbhiyan, which it fi nan cially sup ports.This has been trig gered by a re port of ourComp trol ler and Au di tor Gen eral that Rs10 lakhs were spent un der the pro ject forthe pur chase of four lux ury beds. Rs 90lakhs were trans ferred into an un knownbank ac count.

7,500 color TV sets werepur chased for schools thatdid not even have elec tric ity.Worse, for eign aid changesthe di rec tion of our owngov ern ment ex pen di tures.

In an ear lier World De vel op ment Re port,the World Bank has elab o rated many waysin which aid is hav ing a neg a tive im pact on the re cip i ent coun tries.§ Aid in flu ences the na ture of do mes tic

spend ing. The do nor may give aid for onlycap i tal ex penses and ex pect the re cip i ent to in cur run ning ex pen di tures from its ownbud get. A do nor may make a huge hos pi talfor AIDS, which is high on its own agenda, and that may lead to the poorer coun tryunderwriting the re cur ring ex pen di tures inAIDS pre ven tion. The re cip i ent coun trythen spends less money on pre ven ting TB

or mal nu tri tion, which is more im por tant,and extra on AIDS prevention.§ Do nors may in sist that the re cip i ent

government spend its own money inspec i fied sec tors as a con di tion for re ceiv ingaid. The IMF, for ex am ple, has in sistedthat the poor coun tries seek ing debt re liefhave to open up their econ o mies andfol low an “open bor ders” pol icy. Thatopens up those coun tries for the West ernex ports and mul ti na tional cor po ra tions.Aid then be comes a tool for arm-twist ingre luc tant na tion al ist swadeshi governmentsto fall in line.

Big sal a ries§ For eign do nors of ten pro vide big

sal a ries to their do mes tic em ploy ees.A sal ary of Rs 50,000 per month orcon sul tancy charges of Rs 5,000 per dayis “nor mal” for such ap point ments. There sult is that those who may have joined“good” pol i tics are dis tracted. My friendwas the State-level sec re tary of a Leftparty. He got dis il lu sioned by the in ter nalpol i tics of the party. In stead of fight ingwithin the party, he be came a highly-paidrep re sen ta tive of a for eign do nor. He wasdis tracted from fight ing against the badpolitics in the party.§ Donors of ten pro vide the needed

ser vices di rectly. If a do nor builds schoolsin the vil lages it takes the pres sure off thegovernment sys tem to per form. The re sultis that the government sys tem be comesworse. This un der mines the line de part mentsof the re cip i ent coun try in the long run. InBan gla desh many health and ed u ca tionser vices are pro vided by the do nor-NGOnet work. This re duces the ac count abil ityof the po lit i cal sys tem for its re spon si bil ityin these matters.

Our gov ern ment con tin ues to beg formore aid from West ern coun tries de spitethese neg a tive con se quences be cause it iseas ier to si phon mon ies out of aidedpro jects. It is more dif fi cult to si phon money

from pro jects sup ported by do mes tic taxrev e nues be cause more taxes have to beim posed to make up for the leaked amount. This leads to re sent ment among the tax -pay ers.

Leak ing out money from aided pro jectsdoes not cause such re sent ment. Only more aid is to be sought from the do nor. Thus,the gov ern ment has em barked upon thestrat egy of seek ing aid and leak ing it away.

Root of the mis chief: It is fruit less toask the gov ern ment to put its house inor der be cause ev ery one from the min is terto the low est con tract worker is en joy ingthe fruits of this evil game. We have to hitat the philo soph i cal idea on which thismis con duct thrives. The un der ly ingmis con cep tion is that peo ple’s wel fare canbe se cured through gov ern ment ma chin ery.Peo ple have been led to be lieve that it is the gov ern ment’s re spon si bil ity to pro vide themwith ed u ca tion, health care, wa ter, foodand hous ing. The gov ern ment is us ing thisex pec ta tion of the peo ple as a smokescreen be hind which it is mer rily en gag ing inmas sive cor rup tion. We will have to breakthis mindset.

Min is ters say cor rup tion can be checked only if the peo ple de mand trans par ency.True. But if so ci ety has to or ga nize it self tocon trol cor rup tion by those gov ern mentem ploy ees, then, pray, why not or ga nize topro vide such ser vices di rectly? In stead ofthe vil lage or ga niz ing to seek trans par encyin over see ing its lo cal gov ern ment school,why not get or ga nized and run that schoolthem selves? We shall spare our selves thiscor rup tion only by break ing the myth of aWel fare State.

The FirstFree dom

is n’t for ev ery body. Butyou know some one who

needs it.

10 The First Free dom October 2010P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

— His tory straight —

“Ter ror ists” let ting Ape Linkum’s se cret outBy Jo seph Rorierorie8th@bellsouth.net

“I said the Con sti tu tionalAmend ment had not beenrat i fied.” Thus rang thevery words of Sen a tor John B. Henderson of Mis sourion Feb ru ary 20, 1867.Mo ments ear lier on thatopen floor of Con gress,Sen a tor James R. Doolittleof Wis con sin had voicedhis own griev ances, de clar ing the en tireSen ate ready to send mil i tary forces intothose States hav ing voted against theamend ment, caus ing it to fail rat i fi ca tion.The burn ing words of Sen a tor Doolittledrew no rid i cule be cause they bore the plainand open truth, ex pos ing the du plic ity ofthose Re pub li can Sen a tors – a Con gressclearly un der stand ing that its amend menthad failed. On the floor, Sen a tor Doolittle’s re marks would arouse un law ful ideas, andthat venge ful Con gress then ma li ciouslycarry them out.

“What is said ev ery day,” com plainedDoolittle, “the peo ple of the South havere jected the con sti tu tional amend ment, and there fore we will march upon them andforce them to adopt it at the point of thebay o net, and es tab lish mil i tary power overthem un til they do adopt it.”

Those words, as a mat ter of re cord(Con gres sio nal Globe, Feb ru ary 20, 1867,page 1644), place two ex hib its in ev i denceto the Amer i can Peo ple. First, that theAmend ment did not rat ify, and sec ond, this Con gress chose an other form of rat i fy ingamend ments in or der to get what such ami nor ity wanted.

The le gally-rat i fied 1787 Con sti tu tion,which our sev eral States had vol un tarilyadopted, au tho rizes only “the leg is la tures”of at least three-fourths among said Statesto amend it. Ar ti cle V con tains this sim pleand easy-to-un der stand por tion of theCon sti tu tion. We find no ex tra in stru mentsof in ter pre ta tion, no where within thatchar ter any in ge nious or clev erly-writ tenlan guage that would give Con gress a voicein the amend ing pro cess.

The Peo ple had in this mat ter as signedtwo chores for Con gress: first, to pro posean amend ment when ever two-thirds ofboth houses deemed that nec es sary, andsec ond, to call a con ven tion for pro pos ingamend ments any time two-thirds of theStates pe ti tion them for that pur pose. Inshort, Con gress has just the lonely job ofpro pos ing amend ments. We, the Peo ple,gave them no rat i fy ing power. Re gard ingthe adop tion of con sti tu tional amend mentstheir vot ing power does n’t ex ist. Only theleg is la tures of our sev eral States can rat ifyamend ments. So why did Con gress rally its new form of amend ing the Con sti tu tionwhen Ar ti cle V stands crys tal clear on themat ter? Our States have never amendedAr ti cle V, nor has Con gress made thatat tempt; hence it stands to this day ex actlyas in 1867, and re mains the only methodfor chang ing the Con sti tu tion. The ques tionany re searcher into this mat ter should askis: “What con sti tu tional au thor ity gavethem that op tion?” Re mem ber, Con gressde rives all of its le git i mate power from theCon sti tu tion.

Ar ti cle V def i nitely makes no men tionof dis patch ing mil i tary power to nul lify orrat ify amend ments, which cer tainty ren dersSen a tor Doolittle’s ef fort to do so a crime;like wise ev ery other at tempted methodnot stated in Ar ti cle V. Con sider only theCon sti tu tion’s man date, and let us re viewthat trans gres sion’s re cord of prog ress.

On June 8, 1866, Con gress pro posed the amend ment. So far, so good. How ever, letus note here that sec tion 3 of their wished-for14th amend ment com prised no part of thisbill that the House had sent up. Sen a torBenjamin Wade of Ohio sim ply in sertedthat el e ment, the House hav ing ap provedthe pro posal with no knowl edge of hisad den dum. The stand ing rule has it that if

any part of a state ment proves de fi cient,the en tirety of it is false, and that holds truefor what has hap pened here. Did the House vote on sec tion 3? If not, then that bodydid n’t ap prove what the Sen ate sup pos edly passed. How could they have, if it was n’ton the House floor when considering thispro posed amend ment sent to the Sen ate?So, if part of that bill is bogus, it’s phony inthe whole.

By Feb ru ary 1, 1867, the nec es sarynum ber of rat i fi ca tion votes hav ing failedto come in from the States left no chancefor their pro posed amend ment’s adop tionthrough the nor mal pro cess of Ar ti cle V.Those de cid ing nays had proved that, evenif the other States ne glect ing to send invotes ar rived all yeas, that would n’t havechanged a thing. Thus the amend ment hadflunked; there fore the des potic at ti tude bythe Re pub li can Party’s Mr. Doolittle onFeb ru ary 20, 1867, fore tell ing a post warreinvasion of the South.

We must now take a look at the fed eralgov ern ment’s duty at this point. As sum ingwith con fi dence that “Con gress” did notlike the way these States had voted on itspro posal, what con sti tu tional au thor ityal lowed such ones to al ter the re jectedamend ment, voted down by the leg is la turesof the sev eral States per fectly in har monywith Ar ti cle V? The “lonely” job Con gressex er cises re gard ing amend ments in volvespro pos ing them and noth ing more. Sincethe Con sti tu tion dic tates the method, theironly law ful amend ment av e nue re mainspro pos ing ei ther the same one again or asim i lar amend ment. This they could’vefol lowed up on week af ter week, monthupon month, re peat edly pe ti tion ing thoserat i fy ing bod ies – the States’ leg is la tures –with new ar gu ments to pass it. Con gressin stead im me di ately de clared the South ernStates still in re bel lion, called their votesin valid and, in a par a dox i cal switch, alsoin sisted they stood yet out side and no partof the un ion.

In san ity! But suf fi cient num bers of theNorth ern “news” man ag ers sup ported thatma neu ver. Re mem ber, at this junc ture thesame Con gress had pre vi ously re ad mit tedthese South ern States into the Un ion andall re cords showed them send ing in theirtaxes, run ning the Postal Ser vice and theyhad voted ap proval of the 13th amend mentend ing slav ery, even if un der tre men dousdu ress, un der stand ing that the troops andcar pet bag gers would then va cate. (Hav ingno choice, the South had bought that one,but those Yanks did n’t leave.)

The above ex po si tion alone con tainssuf fi cient ev i dence for de clar ing the 14thamend ment il le git i mate. Need more proof? Ar ti cle V in cludes an even firmer in dict ingclause against those gam bits by Con gress: “...and that no State, with out its con sent,shall be de prived of its equal suf frage inthe Sen ate.” This de nial of suf frage justadds to the ca lam i ties fac ing any one whowould save the so-called 14th Amend mentfrom its date with auld lang syne.

Con gress hav ing de cided to by pass theAr ti cle V man dates and ad lib that fic tiononto the Con sti tu tion, the ma neu ver sets inmo tion a se ries of ac tions that look likelaw, walk like law and even quack like law. They be gin by de ny ing due pro cess to theStates and Peo ple. The Re con struc tion Acts or der mil i tary power to re en ter these States and force them to rat ify the ob jec tion able14th amend ment, as a pre con di tion forget ting seated again – “rep re sented” inCon gress by such mem bers as the newre gime in spects and accepts.

First off, ei ther a State is in the Un ion orit’s out side the Un ion. If the lat ter, then ithas no po lit i cal right to vote on any laws ofthe Un ion. So, if Con gress were cor rect inas sert ing that the South ern States stoodout side the Un ion through out the war anddur ing this re con struc tion pe riod, how didthese “out of the Un ion” States be comeStates “in the Un ion”? Can Con gress justde clare any State in or out of the Un ion at

The Cat Man

will? Or merely call them back in if theyac tu ally had se ceded – as ear lier from theBritish Un ion? The prob lem for Con gress,in or der to work through that du plic ity,in volves con vinc ing us that its ac tions dofit the po si tion taken in this mat ter.

To claim that these States stood out sidethe Un ion, Con gress should’ve rec og nizedsuch sov er eign coun tries and de clared waron them be fore in vad ing their ter ri to ries.Once they de clare war, this po si tion muststand true in their minds – the South ernStates are en e mies. But, the Un ion hav ingpre vailed, what an ab sur dity to con ductrec on cil ing meet ings, just shak ing handsand tell ing those en e mies they can reenterthe temple, be gin vot ing and en joy ing allthe rights of ev ery other State presently inthe Union!

On the other hand, if they were neverout of the Un ion, then Con gress could n’tin vade them like en e mies, but rather mustcall upon the At tor ney Gen eral to in dict the ac cused for crimes – since the al le ga tionsclaimed they had acted out side the law; inwhich case due pro cess co mes into play asthe man da tory pre req ui site be fore tak inglife, lib erty or prop erty. There is no re cordof the States ever hav ing re ceived the firstsum mons to ap pear or an swer be fore anycom pe tent Court the charges al leged againstthem by Con gress. It does not mat ter which po si tion is con sid ered here, or whetherCon gress be lieved them out or in. The factis, Con gress vi o lated ev ery con sti tu tionallaw ei ther way. If the South ern States hadcom mit ted crimes, which the Re pub li cansclaimed, Con gress might’ve brought forthall pos si ble ev i dence and con victed themhands down. The re quire ment to sum monthe ac cused be fore a Court and pro vide due pro cess re mains the only method af fordedby the rat i fied Con sti tu tion for tak ing life,lib erty or prop erty. His tory sees Con gressen croach ing upon all three, plus con temptfor The Fifth Amend ment’s due pro cessclause.

The Re con struc tion Act, named for thepur pose it was to per form, pres aged muchthat would be come sin is ter. Where doesCon gress get the power to re con struct thegov ern ment of any State? In the first place,can Con gress de fine the power of a State?Let’s re view the of fi cial opin ion of theseUnited States just be fore the war.

Pres i dent James Bu chanan pe ti tioned theAt tor ney Gen eral for an of fi cial opin ion on whether the United States could in vade these ced ing States and force them to obey thelaws of the United States. In his re sponseof No vem ber 20, 1860, At tor ney Gen eralJer e miah Black is sued sev eral opin ions asto what the United States might do le gally.The Pres i dent learned he could not in vadethem un der pow ers granted to him by theCon sti tu tion, and an il le gal in va sion byCon gress would dis solve the en tire un ion.Mr. Black went on to say that Con gress had no power to dis place that of the States.“Re con struc tion” and “dis place ment” standsyn on y mous here. Mr. Black em pha sizedthe only le gal way was to ac cuse and bringthem be fore a Court of law. So, with thatbrief ing of the At tor ney Gen eral’s opin ion, let us move for ward and look again at theac tions Con gress took against not only ourStates but the rat i fied Con sti tu tion.

Joining this pro posed amend ment to theCon sti tu tion re quired attain ing leg is la tiverat i fi ca tion from those sev eral States “in”the Un ion and will ingly vot ing ap proval –ab so lute States, not such as have had theirpow ers dis placed and re con structed byout sid ers, but leg is la tures the in dig e nousPeo ple put in of fice through their States’Con sti tu tions; which, clearly, isn’t the case when an oc cu py ing for eign power de cidesand announces terms, whether to the CSA,Germany or Iraq.

And, if these oc cu pied, re con structed-ac cord ing-to-the-new-or der “States” at lastwill ingly rat ify their 14th amend ment, hasthat ap pen dix gained le git i macy, or is theCon sti tu tion which cre ated Con gress now

it self hos tage to the lat ter’s pro pen sity forin vad ing States that re ject its pro pos als,march ing upon them and forc ing them tocall such dic tates “law” at the point of thebay o net and es tab lish ing mil i tary powerover them un til they do bow un der theyoke?

Thus de cided, Con gress sent its troopsto re move from po si tions of au thor ity allof fice hold ers seated by the Peo ple of thoseSouth ern States, re plac ing them with theirap pointed of fi cers. Un der the force of thatmil i tary oc cu pa tion, such po lit i cally-cor rectpol i ti cians re cast and re shaped the cap tiveStates un til, one by one, seek ing re lief from the guns and bay o nets at their heads, just as in structed, those wards be gan vot ing forthe amend ment. Judges who ruled againstthe oc cu pi ers or at tempted in any way tocor rect the crim i nal be hav ior of Con gressfound them selves quickly ar rested.

And, if even a mi nor part ofthe above-re counted his toryupon fur ther in ves ti ga tionproves true, how can any onewith glee ful san ity claim theamend ment passed?

Let’s look at one of the op pos ing camp’s main ar gu ments when at tempting to jus tify their ac tions. Claim ing they must pre servethe Un ion at all costs, judg ing from theabove his tory we must ask whether thesewords man i fest the in va sion’s be hav iordur ing the war and in post war times. If theUn ion was pre served, then surely Ar ti cleV, which only pro vided Con gress with thepower to pro pose amend ments, re mainedpart of that du ra ble con cord. And cer tainlythe due pro cess clause re quir ing an ac cuser to grant all the ad van tages of a Court trialbe fore tak ing any life, lib erty or prop ertyfrom a State or Cit i zen would’ve con tin ued in the pre served un ion. How about the 9thand 10th Amend ments; did they survive?We might com pare the Con sti tu tion as itstood be fore the war with all those crimesbe yond trea son com mit ted by a Con gressas sum ing in nu mer a ble pow ers unto itself,and find there is no preserved union at all.

It is un de ni able: this “14th amend ment”de vi ates in so many ways from the orig i nalcom pact that one can not la bel such a planfor to tally chang ing the fed eral gov ern mentand re tir ing the U. S. Con sti tu tion a mereamend ment, as it did not com ply with theamend ing pro cess of Ar ti cle V. Thus, evenif the thing had no cor rupt ped i gree, itcould not stand on its mer its, so we mustlook at that atroc ity in a dif fer ent light thanas an amend ment.

Let’s re visit the words of a few men who held of fice at the time. De scrib ing this to tal change of gov ern ment, our first speakeris Ken tucky Gov er nor Thomas Bramlette,ad dress ing the leg is la ture in 1867: “Thejust bal ance of power be tween the Stateand fed eral gov ern ment is sought to bede stroyed and the cen tral iza tion of powerto be es tab lished in the fed eral gov ern ment through amend ments to the Con sti tu tion,which, if suc cess ful, will de stroy thoserights re served to the States and peo ple,and which are es sen tial to the pres er va tionof free gov ern ment.” (See Ken tucky House Jour nal.)

Next, New Jer sey Joint Res o lu tion Nr. 1of March 24th, to wit: “The ob ject of said

The “14th Amend ment” was n’t rat i fied!It’s not the law! Get this

32-page book let

What ev erycat is

dis cov er inglately

into the paws of our kit tens for un der $1oo

per ad ven ture. Read it and you’ll see why we’re copy-cat ting the en emy’s en treaty,“From each ac cord ing to his abil ity…”

10 for $ 9 … PPD 100 for $ 75 … PPD

50 for $40… PPD 200 for $140… PPD

Men tion this ad The First Free domOr der them to day: P. O. Box 385

Silverhill, AL 36576

— Four teenth wha-aat? — The First Free dom October 2010 11P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

amend ment were one – to place new andun heard-of pow ers in the hands of afrac tion, that it might ab sorb to it self allex ec u tive, ju di cial and leg is la tive power,nec es sary to se cure to it self im mu nity forthe un con sti tu tional acts it has al readycom mit ted, and those it has since in flictedon a too pa tient peo ple...It en larges theju di cial power of the united States so asto bring ev ery law passed by the State andev ery prin ci ple of com mon law re lat ing tolife lib erty or prop erty within the ju ris dic tionof the fed eral tri bu nals ...was in tended toover throw the sys tem of self gov ern mentun der which the peo ple of the united States have for eighty years en joyed.”

This next quote co mes tous from the brother-in-lawof Abra ham Lin coln. Mr.Orville Brown ing stated:“Be as sured that if this newpro vi sion be en grafted in the Con sti tu tion, it will, in time,change the en tire struc tureand tex ture of our gov ern -ment, and sweep away all the guar an tees of safety de visedand pro vided by our pa tri oticSires of the Rev o lu tion.”

Ei ther way you look at it, no amend ment passed, but raw force brought forth thisnew gov ern ment. And it’s for eign to ourCon sti tu tion. Amend ment by the mil i taryor New Gov ern ment by mil i tary power –which do we want the mil i tary to back offfrom?

One clearly dis cerns two cen tral ideas in the above quotes. First, Thomas Bramlette, Orville Brown ing and the New Jer seyleg is la ture well un der stood this so-calledamend ment’s or der ing such broad changes as would quickly dis solve the gov ern mentthey knew and em power an ad verse re gime in its place. Second, they iden tify the evilin tent, du plic ity and out right de ceit thispro posal con tained. Ei ther of them wouldne gate ac cep tance if tried openly in a bonafide Court of Law; for, how ever clever itsfram ers when in sert ing care fully-cho senlan guage into their said amend ment, fraudcould never have gained rat i fi ca tion. Thishid den agenda de cid edly breaches trust.

We must also re mem ber that only asmall group of Sen a tors un der stood thischi ca nery’s true purpose: to over ride theAmer i can Peo ple’s sta tus and cen tral izetheir gov ern ment. One of those, JamesBlaine, in an out-of-the-or di nary speech on Au gust 29, 1866, just three months shy ofthe pro posed amend ment, stated be fore the Peo ple in Skowhegan, Maine: its pur posewas to rid Amer ica of State cit i zen ship andbring ev ery Amer i can un der the fed eralgov ern ment. “We in tend to make cit i zen -ship Na tional,” he stated. “Here to fore, aman has been a cit i zen of the United Statesbe cause he was a cit i zen of some-one ofthe States: now, we pro pose to re verse that. And make him a cit i zen of any State wherehe chooses to re side, by de fin ing in ad vancehis Na tional cit i zen ship.” No tice the term,“make him a cit i zen.” This rad i cal-mindedCon gress – ob sessed with an ar ro gantlycre ative at ti tude – could not mus ter thenec es sary ma jor ity to pass their pro posedamend ment, and only by pull ing guns andknives tilted the scale in its fa vor. In deed,how could that kind of think ing face hon est bal lot ing?

Sen a tor Ros coe Conkling of Ohio, whoalso had his per sonal grudge against thede feated South, mys ti cally man aged tore tain the only copy ever ad mit ted into the

pub lic re cords of what un til 1882 hadre mained se cret hear ings by the Com mit teeof Fif teen. The doc u ment’s re quired printrun of 5,000 cop ies had gone to heads ofof fices and the var i ous li brar ies of judges,Con gress men, etc., yet this one per sonalcopy alone ap peared openly, win ning hiscase in San Mateo County v. South ernPa cific Rail road Com pany by ar gu ing thatthe word “per son,” as used in the 14thAmend ment, meant cor po ra tions as well.In tro duc ing his pri vate notes of one suchCon gres sio nal Hear ing, he re vealed thefram ers’ in ten tions dis cussed at those “side”hear ings by the so-called Joint Com mit teeof Fif teen – formed to op pose Pres i dentJohn son’s veto of the re con struc tion actsand pass laws cir cum vent ing the Pres i dent’sper for mance. Where did those other 4,999cop ies go? No one is saying. And, if not for Pro fes sor Benjamin Kendrick, a re searcher ques tion ing the Mateo case cited abovecon cern ing this Mys tery Hear ing, since nodis sem i na tion of that re cord ever went outto the pub lic or heads of States, we shouldnever have learned about the meet ing.Thanks to Pro fes sor Kendrick’s hunt ing itdown and pub lish ing in his 1914 book TheJour nal of the Joint Com mit tee of Fif teenand Re con struc tion the only copy knownto sur vive, We the Peo ple fi nally learnedabout that com mit tee’s she nan i gans. Still,it’s to won der if any one can make out theamend ment’s full in tents and con tin u ingagenda, see ing only its thus-far-re vealedevil con se quences in ev i dence. Do we findour way for ward again by an other av e nue,be fore re trac ing those prod ded steps outfront of fixed bay o nets calling an im pos ter“amend ment” le gally rat i fied, es pe ciallywhen the wick ed ness of its de ceit has leftfin ger prints so viv idly em bossed all overthe doc u ment? Soil sam ples would prove it came from the swamps of de cep tion andbot tom ru ins at Spitesville.

Vol umes of writ ings might con tinue forages on the mis han dled pow ers hav ingforced this so-called amend ment onto theUnited States Con sti tu tion. But, for thesake of brev ity, I shall fur ther re cite only

what pub lic au thor i ties have said in theirof fi cial capacities.

The Utah State Su preme Court in 1968ex posed the in iq uity of this amend ment’spas sage, de claim ing the Mil i tary’s use offorce, even re mark ing that be cause of thisamend ment it felt like “slaves in a gal ley.”The case is known as Dyett v. Turner 439P2d 266, 269, 20 U2d 403. And, just sevenyears later: “I can not be lieve that anycourt, in full pos ses sion of its fac ul ties,could hon estly hold that the amend mentwas prop erly ap proved and adopted.”[State v. Phillips, Pa cific Re porter, 2ndSe ries, Vol. 540, Page 941, 942 (1975)]

The Con gres sio nal Re cords of July 12,1909, page 4404, re count a speech called“Pe cu liar His tory of The Four teenthAmend ment,” which ex plained how newgov ern ments were cre ated in a con ven tion: “Un der this re gime if a State gov ern mentwas about to re ject the pro posed amend mentit was promptly de posed and one of thosenew gov ern ments at once in stalled, whoseac tion would in sure im me di ate rat i fi ca tion,”and, quot ing the Ar ti cle V man dates that“...‘leg is la tures’ and ‘con ven tions’ in theStates are given au thor ity to rat ify or re jectamend ments pro posed by Con gress… Inother words, they were rat i fied by de factoleg is la tures.”

Fur ther on, the speaker states “...thatCon gress has no power in the pre misesaf ter it has once pro posed an amend ment to the States as the Con sti tu tion pro vides, noteven of re call ing the amend ment; there fore the pas sage of any res o lu tion by Con gressde clar ing that a given amend ment has orhas not been duly rat i fied by the States, suchas was done with re spect to the four teenthamend ment, is ul tra vires and void.”

This speaker claims they can not even“re call” it to the floor again. Re call ing andre-pro pos ing may or may not mean thesame thing, but it is clear that trou bledwa ters are as wet on one as the other. Anote on the term “new gov ern ment” usedby this speaker, two words, and a pop u larstate ment found in many doc u ments of thetime: The re con struc tion of fi cer Gen eral

Camby, on July 11, 1868, in a tele gram tothe pup pet gov er nor of South Carolinastat ing that, since the 14th amend ment hadsup pos edly rat i fied, the army could cease its con trol “...ex cept so far as may be nec es saryto close up any un fin ished busi ness, andyou will ab stain from in ter fer ence in civilmat ters, ex cept in the case of un law fulforc ible op po si tion to the in au gu ra tion ofthe new State Gov ern ment.”

The in au gu ra tion of the “new” StateGov ern ment?

And on June 14, 1967, Con gres sio nalRe cords, page 15641-46, Mr. Raricken tered his speech in Con gress as sem bled,mak ing such state ments as, “Whereas thepur ported 14th amend ment to the UnitedStates Con sti tu tion was never law fullyadopted in ac cor dance with the re quire mentsof the United States Con sti tu tion … Thepur ported 14th Amend ment to the UnitedStates Con sti tu tion is and should be heldto be in ef fec tive, in valid, null and void…”wherein he care fully recounts its sev eralin fringe ments of the U. S. Con sti tu tion.The reader is ad vised to pull a copy fromthis ref er ence and read it in full.

The ev i dence is so over whelm ing that itshould amaze any in tel li gent per son howthe fraud u lent “14th amend ment” couldsur vive 142 years and we have still notripped that thing from the pages of Lawand cast it into outer dark ness for ever. Ifthese few bits of his tor i cal fact con vincethe reader that their 1868 pro posal neverrat i fied, then what if I told you this ar ti clere cites just a small frac tion of the mas siveev i dence eas ily discoverable and open forre view, be cause there is so much more outthere. Let me close here with my open ingquote from Sen a tor Henderson:

“I said the Con sti tu tional Amend menthad not been rat i fied.”

That the 14th Amend ment was never rat i fied is acer tain fact. See “Cat Man” Jo seph Rorie’s com pletehis tory be hind this enor mous hoax which haunts ourlives no less to day than when “rat i fied at the point of a bay o net” in 1868, a well-re searched and en light en ingstory at www.gulftel.com/firstfreedom/Cats.pdf . The “Cat Man” trav els and speaks be fore groups wher ever in vited “for ex penses and tuna.”

Ac tiv ist Pack age of DVDsPa tri ots! Re ceive five each of the twenty most pop u larDVDs, plus an other tenBo nus DVDs. To tal: 110discs for $99.00. Ron Neil,1623 S. Chis holm Trail,Granbury, Texas 76048.

817-776-5475

Fair deal for Pol lard: cap i tal punishmentWhy are they asking Amer ica to

ne go ti ate with a ter ror ist State?

“FREE POLLARD” poster in Is rael

By Gordon Duffveteranstoday.com

“....the depth ofPol lard’s info that hepassed on to Rus sia(amongst oth ers) wasas dam ag ing as theRosenberg’s dur ingthat era: dev as tat inglystate of the ar t .Vir tu ally ev ery thing that we knew/knowabout nukes...” (U. S. Navy nu clear weap onsex pert ex clu sive to Vet er ans To day).

Is rael is de mand ing the im me di atere lease of Jon a than Pol lard. Sen tenced tolife in prison for spy ing against the UnitedStates, Pol lard is a hero in Is rael. Jon a thanPol lard, an Amer i can of Jew ish an ces tryand Zi on ist ex trem ist views who pub liclyac claims that he tried to de stroy Amer ica to help main tain the “ra cial pu rity of Is rael”may have been spy ing for Is rael, but allthe in for ma tion he stole – a truck load ofAmer ica’s most vi tal se crets – went to theSo viet Un ion.

Why did Is rael send this in for ma tion toRus sia, nam ing all Amer i can in tel li genceas sets be hind the Iron Cur tain, the ex actlo ca tions of all NATO nu clear weap onsfa cil i ties, mis sile si los and de tails on howto de feat Amer ica’s de fenses from nu clearat tack? Amer ica does n’t openly ad mit it,but this is ex actly what was done, and done with one pur pose, a sur gi cal strike onAmer ica, start ing and end ing World WarIII in hours.

If Amer ica re leases Pol lard, Is rael agreesto sus pend its 62 year eth nic cleans ingpro gram against Pal es tin ian Mus lims andChris tians, for a short time at least.

The Amer i can pub lic has never beentold the truth about Pol lard. Cur rent fig ures of deaths di rectly at trib uted to Pol lard’sspy ing are at be tween 110 and 120 Amer i canCIA agents and up to 1,600 top Amer i canin tel li gence as sets among for eign na tion als.Min i mally, Pol lard should have faced 110mur der counts for Amer i can vic tims alone. He should have been tried and ex e cutedmany years ago ex cept for in ter ces sion bythe gov ern ment of Is rael. Since Pol lard’ssen tenc ing in 1987, they have con tin u allyde manded his re lease.

For some rea son, the State of Is rael hasnever been called to ac count for its fullcom plic ity in Pol lard’s crimes. Doz ens ofIs raeli mil i tary and in tel li gence of fi cialswere fully complicit, along with Pol lard,and should have been ex tra dited to theUnited States and tried for their crimes.Ad di tion ally, why is n’t it a crime for anIs raeli to spy against the United States onbe half of the So viet Un ion? If Is rael andthe United States are al lies, then spy ing onthe United States for Rus sia should havebeen a crime in Is rael also.

In stead, Pol lard and his ac com pli ces inIs rael are treated as na tional heroes and theAmer i can gov ern ment has re mained si lent. More over, the Amer i can press, even whenre port ing Is rael’s cur rent de mand forPol lard’s re lease, fails to out line the mostba sic facts of the case and, in par tic u lar, the most glar ing in con sis ten cies.

Wolf Blitzer, then of the Je ru sa lem Post,in ter viewed Pol lard in his jail cell andwrote an ar ti cle call ing Pol lard “Is rael’sMas ter Spy.” Blitzer painted Pol lard as

the vic tim of an Amer i can witch hunt andan anti-Se mitic FBI. The Wash ing ton Postpub lished the Blitzer ac count. Amer ica’sme dia pulled in be hind this false coverstory paint ing Pol lard as a vic tim.

Blitzer used his sup port of Pol lard tovault him self to the top of Amer ica’s mostre spected me dia, the voice of CNN.

What is not re ported is that Blitzer wasonly able to “spin” Pol lard as aid ing Is raelbe cause the dam age done to the UnitedStates was so se vere that it today re mainsclas si fied. Polland and Blitzer talked about steal ing intel on the PLO and Libya, infolong shared with Is rael, but noth ing aboutNATO’s or der of bat tle, de fenses in case ofa So viet ground of fen sive against West ernEu rope, the real heart of Pol lards ef forts.

The deal cut Pol lard, leav ing him alive,is like giv ing a drunk driver who plowsthrough a side walk full of kin der gart ners aticket for a bro ken tail light.

Where is Amer ica’s press?

The FirstFree dom

is for some one you know.

12 The First Free dom October 2010P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

— How it works —

Can non fod der for the New World Or der Part 1 of 2By Deanna Spingola

NewsWithViews.com

In 1926 , Gen e ra lCherep-Spir idovichwrote, “War is only a‘le gal ized mass mur der.’Thus Christ pointed

out those who ar range all wars andrev o lu tions, and that their chief cause isSa tan and his sons’ ‘lust of mur der.’ But‘Chris tians’ never seem to agree withChrist.”1 Gan dhi con curred when he said,“Ev ery one but Chris tians un der stands thatJe sus was non vi o lent.” Those who “ar rangeall wars,” are typ i cally among the very topech e lon of se cret so ci et ies, of ten Illuminati front groups like Skull and Bones, many of whom serve in elected and unelectedgov ern ment po si tions. Gov ern ment of fi cialsim ple ment a dark agenda of ter ror ism andgeno cide through di rec tives de vel opedby mem bers of the Coun cil on For eignRe la tions (CFR) the Bilderberg (BB) andthe Tri lat eral Com mis sion (TC). Somemay view these al le ga tions as in cred i blecon spir acy the o ries, which is ex actly theper spec tive that the me dia-man ag ingelites en cour age in or der to con ceal theirrep re hen si ble op er a tions and their trueloy al ties.

Gen eral Cherep-Spiridovich said thatthose who ar range wars have a “lust ofmur der.” They also dem on strate a lustfor power and profit, made pos si ble bygov ern ment-sanc tioned war fare, fundedby pri vately owned cen tral banks whichprint bil lions of debt-based, in ter est-ladendol lars, debt that is passed off onto thecit i zens who also fight and die in thosewars. The in creased glut of cash into themar ket de val ues the cur rency al ready incir cu la tion and fur ther jeop ar dizes thecoun try’s di min ish ing econ omy. Thema lev o lent, par a sit i cal bank ers achievetheir ob jec tives by fund ing power-hun gry,of ten psy cho pathic, well-com pen satedpol i ti cians who ac com mo date the bank ersat the ex pense of the cit i zens they claim torep re sent. Rep re sen ta tive gov ern ment endswhen the polls close. Chris tians have beenper suaded to ac cept what Christ long agodis dained and warned against – usury.Cit i zens are ma nip u lated into par tic i pat ingin war. Es sen tially, in ac cept ing pro-warpro pa ganda, we aban don Chris tian ity andac qui esce to the mass slaugh ter of strang erstar geted by the war mon gers. In ef fect, weidola trously “wor ship the golden calf” ofthe banker-backed, man-made Statewhen we aban don the peace ful ten ets ofChris tian ity. If dou ble-minded in di vid u als, ei ther na ively or know ingly, pro mote warwhile claim ing to ab hor abor tion, weab so lutely must eval u ate their mo tives andloy al ties and then with hold our sup port for

war fare. In Chris tian ity, there should be nofence sit ting, no serv ing of two mas ters.

The Ten Com mand ments in clude “Youshall have no other gods be fore me” and“You shall not mur der (kill). Com mu nistsand So cial ists who, like Lu ci fer, arere bel lious to wards God, at tempt to re placeHim and im pose their own laws upon thenaïve masses. An au thor i ta tive Statead vo cates, with nu mer ous de ceit fuljus ti fi ca tions, mass mur der throughwar fare, ac tu ally geno cide of en tirefor eign pop u la tions. Like Lu ci fer, sinceLin coln’s War, the war plan ners al ways shiftthe blame for the ini ti a tion of war fare ontooth ers via the use of false flag op er a tions.The highly skilled war plan ners cho reo graphor ag gres sively pro voke an at tack and thencall for a re tal ia tory strike against thepeo ple they at trib ute the at tack to. From theshots fired at Fort Sumter, the ex plo sionon the USS Maine, the sink ing of theLusitania, the at tack on Pearl Har bor, theTonkin in ci dent, and nu mer ous at tacks onvar i ous U. S. em bas sies, there have beenman aged as saults. One of the ma jorfunc tions of the CIA is to cre ate chaos inother coun tries – just so the U. S. can jus tifysend ing in mil i tary troops to re store or der.That is how the de ceit ful war plan nersget our sup port; we be lieve that we areval iantly de fend ing our coun try.

Chris tians should be the first to rec og nizethe prob a bil ity of se cret so ci et ies or se cretcom bi na tions and money in ter ests that areso in tent on de priv ing oth ers of their lib erty,life and prop erty. Christ’s death, thoughre demp tive, was the re sult of a cur rencycon spir acy. There were also plots to killPaul and other dis ci ples. Early day “pub licre la tions” pro vo ca teurs skill fully in flu encedthe pli able masses in or der to ex e cute theirco vert agenda – re mem ber, the lov ingad mir ers who bowed be fore Christ uponHis en try into Je ru sa lem, were the ex actsame peo ple who, a few days later,clam ored for His death. What changed?The mon ey chang ers, the same greedypeo ple who sold the over-priced sac ri fi cialan i mals in the tem ple court yard, would havelost their fu ture prof its if peo ple ac ceptedHis ra tio nal teach ings on usury and thechar i ta ble ces sa tion of the ex ploi ta tion ofoth ers. Af ter all, we work for our sakes, not to have oth ers con fis cate the prod uct of our la bors.

Gov ern ment ed u ca tion spawns bat tal ionsof po ten tial sol diers who are will ing to die“for their coun try.” Ea ger sol diers havebeen ad van ta geously and sub tly pre paredthrough com pel ling peer pres sure par tic i -pa tion in Pen ta gon-de signed video gamesthat have been com mer cially mar ketedas en ter tain ment. Du ti ful teach ers work ing within the fed er ally con trolled ed u ca tionalsys tem reg u larly me mo ri al ize the vil est,most war mon ger ing pol i ti cians of the past.This sub tle pro gram ming is sup ported by acon trolled me dia which has been li censed

and reg u lated by the fed eral gov ern ment(FCC) since the 1920s. The in ter na tionalbank ers, who profit most from war fare,have con trolled the en ter tain ment anddoc u men tary me dia for de cades. Me diamo guls, of ten in con junc tion with thePen ta gon, pro duce mov ies that glo rifywar, pro mote im mo ral ity, im mod esty andpro fan ity, all in an ef fort to sub tly shapeour opin ions, al ter our cul ture and per suadeus to aban don tra di tional Chris tian val ues.If Chris tians for feit so-called small ide als,they are more likely to re lin quish Christ’spro hi bi tion against war fare.

Prior to the U. S. en ter ing World War II,the in flu en tial me dia vil i fied anti-warac tiv ists by char ac ter iz ing them asun pa tri otic, Nazi and anti-Se mitic. Theywere por trayed as un-Amer i can trai tors.2

These psy cho log i cally de vised tac tics werecre ated by Ed ward Bernays, the nephew ofSigmund Freud, and are still em ployedto day to dis cour age dis sent and im mo bi lizein quiry. Anti-war ac tiv ists and dis si dentsare al lowed air time with super-skilledra dio and tele vi sion hosts whose solepur pose is to re pu di ate the ideas of theirguests, rid i cule the truth, and cas ti gatecan di dates who ques tion U.S. for eignpol icy. These tac tics are de signed topro duce a herd men tal ity within thepop u la tion. In di vid u als re con sider theirrhet o ric when they see oth ers dis cred itedfor sim i lar views, and re main si lent. Thesede vices, which dis credit in di vid u als andin for ma tion, also dis cour age oth ers fromex am in ing cer tain events and cir cum stancesfor them selves.

In ter na tional bank ers with out par tic u larna tional loy al ties or re gard for those usedas can non fod der typ i cally fund bothsides of ev ery war and of ten have ma jorin vest ments in, or out right own er ship of,am mu ni tion pro duc tion fa cil i t ies.Guar an teed con tracts for tons of one-time-use bul lets and bombs are tre men douslymore lu cra tive than sell ing cars andwash ing ma chines to con sum ers. HenryKissinger, one-time U. S. Sec re tary of State,said, “Mil i tary men are just dumb, stu pidan i mals to be used as pawns for for eignpol icy.”3

Given the man ner in which in di vid ualgov ern ments ex ploit sol diers to en richthe bank ers, those troops are ev i dentlyex pend able. Their blood ied bod ies cre atemas sive prof its for the in ter na tionalbank ers, the orig i nal ad vo cates ofglob al ism, ac quired through war fare,usu ally fol lowed by sanc tions, rep a ra tionsand fi nally obe di ence to an in ter na tionalen tity. A na tion uses war fare to im pose itspol i cies on an other na tion. Gutele Schnapper

Rothschild, wife of Mayer A. Rothschild,who grew enor mously wealthy by col lect ingusury while fund ing the Eu ro pean wars,said, “If my sons did not want wars, therewould be none.” One might add “grand sons,great grand sons and other male rel a tives andall of their bank ing af fil i ates cam ou flagedun der nu mer ous names – Goldman Sachs,Lehman, Kuhn-Loeb, Citibank and oth ers.”

While Mother Rothschild soundedde cid edly cold-hearted, other Tal mudic Judaics, like the con tem po rary RabbiHaim Druckman, a leader of the Re li giousZi on ist move ment, said on Sep tem ber 7,2004, “Kill ing en emy ci vil ians dur ing war isnor mal.” Druckman and other like-mindedZi on ists view Gen tiles and even theirown Se mitic kins men, the Pal es tin ians,in clud ing chil dren, as sub-hu mans. TheTal mud states, “Our lives come first.”Druckman rid i culed Chris tian op po si tionto war fare, “The Chris tian preach ing of‘turn ing the other cheek’ does n’t con cernus, and we will not be im pressed by thosewho pre fer the lives of our en e mies to ourlives.”4

And who is the en emy? Any coun try thatre sists the in ter na tional bank ers’ in sis tence on in stall ing a cen tral bank within thatState. Fur ther, banker-backed cor po ra tions tar get, con fis cate and profit from thesei zure and con trol of the nat u ral re sources in the said en emy’s land. Many Chris tians,in doc tri nated to be lieve that there is sucha thing as a “good war,” have un wit tinglyac cepted bar baric to tal war tac tics re gard ingun armed women and chil dren, and areper fectly will ing to en gage in mass slaugh terat the be hest of the bank ers.

Le nin (Vladi mir Ilyich Ulyanov), aBolshevik said, “The es tab lish ment ofa cen tral bank is 90% of communizinga na tion.”5 The way to get the U. S. toincrementally em brace com mu nism be ganin 1913 with the es tab lish ment of thepri vately owned Fed eral Re serve. Themas sively wealthy own ers of the Fed eralRe serve would ul ti mately in vest in and siton the boards of ev ery ma jor cor po ra tionand even tu ally cap ture the ma jor ity ofAmer ica’s wealth in ad di tion to usury,bur den some tax a tion and con tin ual war fare.

Deanna Spingola has been a quilt de signer and isthe au thor of two books. She has trav eled ex ten sivelyteach ing and lec tur ing on her unique meth ods. Shehas al ways been an avid reader of non-fic tion worksde signed to ed u cate rather than en ter tain. She is ac tive in fam ily his tory re search and lec tures on that topic.Cur rently she is di rec tor of the lo cal Fam ily His toryCen ter. She has a great in ter est in pol i tics and thedi rec tion of cur rent gov ern ment pol i cies, par tic u larlyas they re late to the Con sti tu tion.

web site: www.spingola.com email: deanna@spingola.com

© 2010 Deanna Spingola – All Rights Re served

1. The Se cret World Gov ern ment or “The Hid denHand” by Gen eral Cherep-Spiridovich, The Anti-Bol she vist Pub lish ing As so ci a tion, New York, 1926,p. 8

2. Charles Lindbergh’s – Sep tem ber 11, 1941, DesMoines Speech3. Henry Kissinger was quoted in Kiss the BoysGood bye: How the United States Be trayed Its OwnPOW’s in Viet nam by Monika Jensen-Stevenson andWil liam Stevenson, Plume Pub lish ing, New York,1999

4. Ju da ism Dis cov ered, a Study of the Anti-Bib li calRe li gion of Rac ism, Self Wor ship, Su per sti tion andDe ceit by Mi chael Hoffman, In de pend ent His tory and Re search, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, 2008, pp. 473-4745. The Syn a gogue of Sa tan, the Se cret His tory of Jew ishWorld Dom i na tion by An drew Car ring ton Hitch cock, River Crest Pub lish ing, Aus tin, Texas, 2007, p. 102

Does the Pal es tin ian di as pora care enough to be come en gaged?By Alan Hart

sabbah.biz

Will fu ture his to ri ans con clude that thePal es tin ian di as pora be trayed its oc cu piedand op pressed broth ers and sisters?

The real his tory of the mak ing and thesus tain ing of to day’s con flict in and overPal es tine, now called Is rael, in vites thecon clu sion that the Arab re gimes – moreby de fault than any de sign in my view –be trayed the Pal es tin ians. The ques tionhere ad dressed is: Will fu ture his to ri ans

By Naji al-Ali

con clude that the Pal es tin ian di as porabe trayed its oc cu pied and op pressedbroth ers and sis ters?

There’s no mys tery about the Arab(re gime) be trayal. When the Pal es tine filewas closed by Is rael’s 1948 vic tory on thebat tle field and the ar mi stice agree ments,

the di vided and im po tent Arab re gimesse cretly shared the same hope as theZi on ists and the ma jor pow ers. It was thatthe file would re main closed forever. ThePal es tin ians were sup posed to ac cept theirlot as the sac ri fi cial lamb on that al tar ofpo lit i cal ex pe di ency.

Nor is there any mys tery about why theArab re gimes were at one with the Zi on istsand ma jor pow ers in hop ing there wouldnever be a re gen er a tion of Pal es tin ianna tion al ism. They all knew that this wouldone day bring about a con fron ta tion withZi on ism; and no body wanted that.

The FirstFree dom

is for some one you know.

The end of open bor ders in Eu rope?lsrebellion.blogspot.com

The sur pris ing suc cess of the Swe denDem o crats has the pro-glob al ists wring ingtheir hands – Charles John son sobs that“xe no pho bia” and “Eurofascism” havemade “big gains,” which he de nounces as“bad news.”

For de cades, the Swe den Dem o cratshave been on the rise in the polls. No onehas taken this threat se ri ously – the onlyre sponse has been to “demonize,” not onlythe party, but more im por tantly the peo ple

who con sider vot ing for them.This makes the job of poll ing agen cies

dif fi cult, since the shame fac tor has peo plely ing to opin ion poll sters. But one alsosus pects that this demonization has ac tu allycon trib uted to the SD’s rise.

Hmm – the Swed ish rul ing elite tried todemonize those who dared re sist them, and only ended up stir ring more peo ple to jointhe fight to pre serve their na tion? Funnyhow fa mil iar that sounds, is n’t it?

And it’s puz zling that Mex ico can build

a south ern wall to keep il le gal im mi grantsfrom en ter ing Mex ico via Gua te mala and the rest of the world makes no mur mur;yet, when a White na tion undertakes themost fee ble at tempts to pre serve its cul tureand ter ri to rial in teg rity, that’s con demnedas “rac ism”!

— Clear ing the air — The First Free dom October 2010 13P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

Who prof its from the global warm ing myth?By Anton Evseyev

Pravda.Ru

THE UNUSUALLY HOT sum mer thatdev as tated Rus sia this year once againre minded of a trendy hor ror story called“global warm ing.” Pro po nents of thishy poth e sis, talk ing about their cause, haveen tirely lost sight of an ab nor mally coldwin ter in the South ern Hemi sphere. Theirop po nents said that sin gle point can not beused for plot ting. How ever, rea son ablear gu ments both for and against the warm inghave not been pre sented to the gen eralpub lic.

There is an old joke about a weathersta tion in Chukotka.

Once the Chukchi came totheir sha man and asked himwhether it would be a coldwin ter. He re plied that thewin ter will be cold, and saidto gather plenty of fire wood.Af ter awhile he de cided totest his pre dic tion, go ing tothe near est weather sta tion.The me te o rol o gist looked outof the win dow, and told thissha man that the win ter, nodoubt, would be cold, sincethe Chukchi were ac tivelycol lect ing fire wood.

Stud ies by many sci en tists who prom iseglobal warm ing are not much dif fer entfrom ob ser va tions of that me te o rol o gist. Ifyou an a lyze all the meth ods they use, it isas ton ish ing that any thing what so ever canbe pre dicted on the ba sis of their findings.

The fo cus of stud ies on global cli matepro cesses is tra di tion ally given to thestudy of CO2 and other green house gasesin the at mo sphere. In deed, the in crease inthe pro por tion of these gases in the airen ve lope of our planet, ac cord ing tosci en tists, leads to the so-called green houseef fect, where CO2 is formed from a cer tain“film” that in ter feres with the trans fer ringof heat from the ground to the cold outerspace. Sci en tists in many coun tries arecon cerned that, be cause hu man emis sionsof this gas into the at mo sphere is ever-in creas ing, the green house ef fect may re sult in com ing years.

Here it gets in ter est ing. First of all, noone can say ex actly how much CO2 isemit ted into the at mo sphere ev ery yearbe cause of hu man ac tiv ity. Amer i canre search ers name the num ber as 5.5 bil liontons; Aus tra lians 7.2 mil lion tons; Rus siansroughly 10 bil lion tons. Any one who seessuch a dis crep ancy im me di ately raises theques tion: but where do these num berscome from? How was the mea sure ment ofthis “dan ger ous” gas ac tu ally taken?

It turns out there is no sin gle ac count ingmethod. Some use the amount of in dus trialand au to mo bile ex hausts of en ter prises inin dus tri al ized coun tries and mul ti ply thatby the num ber of days in a year, ex clud ingweek ends and hol i days. Oth ers mea surethe to tal amount of CO2 in the at mo spherefor sev eral years and then blame all car bondi ox ide on hu man ac tiv i ties. Some usu allycal cu late the num ber based on min ing andfuel pro duc tion dy nam ics.

It is ob vi ous that the data ob tained bycer tain meth ods say noth ing. Here is anex am ple. As sume that we know ex actlyhow much CO2 is emit ted into the air by aspe cific fac tory. But it is un clear how much gas re mains in the at mo sphere, be causesoon, for ex am ple, a field of wheat caneas ily dis pose of that en tire ex haust, as weknow plants con sume car bon di ox ide forpho to syn the sis. No one has con ductedre search on how much car bon di ox ide ispro duced by man, or con sumed by plantsand phytoplankton.

Much more re li able is the method ofsys tem at i cally mea sur ing car bon di ox ide in

the at mo sphere, but with some dif fi cul ties.Man is not the only “pol luter” of Earth’sat mo sphere; CO2 is daily de liv ered to theat mo sphere by most liv ing or gan isms onour planet, plus vol ca noes. The oceansalone, ac cord ing to Amer i can re search ers,an nu ally emit about 90bil lion tons of this gas.How to dis tin guishbe tween “man-made” CO2 and “nat u ral” isnot quite clear.

More over, sci en tists still know noth ing aboutnat u ral os cil la tions ofcar bon di ox ide in theat mo sphere. No body knows why the ocean some times emits more and at other timesless. So why are some re search ers ad a mant in claim ing re cently that the quan tity of“man made” CO2 emis sions has in creased?What if these are not “tech no log i cal” but“nat u ral” emis sions?

As you can see, there is no sin gle sys tem for cal cu lat ing the amount of green housegases in the at mo sphere, but also there isno uni fied meth od ol ogy to in ter pret thedata. And, most in ter est ingly, such sim i lar“chaos” is ob served in stud ies of changes

in av er age temperatures on Earth.Here sci en tists in each coun try mainly

use their own weather sta tion data, andthen make con clu sions on a “plan e tary”scale. But it is no se cret that if a weathersta tion, for ex am ple in Mos cow, re cords

a steady in crease intem per a ture, say, dur ingthe sum mer pe riod,then such law will notfol low through out theworld dur ing that samein ter val. For a weathersta tion some where inLima may, con versely,re cord a steady drop in

tem per a ture. Con sol i da tion of all the datainto a sin gle ta ble is not done by any onemainly be cause many of the me te o ro log i calob ser va tions are done by the or der of themil i tary and, there fore, con sti tute a Statese cret.

The same can be said about many othersymp toms of so-called global warm ing –for ex am ple, rapid melt ing of ice in theArc tic and Ant arc tic. Sat el lites only ob servethe pro cess, but no one can ex plain whythis hap pens, since it is reg is tered for thefirst time. In ad di tion, re search ers of ten do

not take into ac count other pos si ble causesthat lead to sim i lar re sults. What if it is awarm, un ac counted-for un der wa ter cur rentor a vol cano act ing mis chie vous?

Any way, if we re call that the sys tem aticstudy of the cli mate be gan just over 100years ago, we can con fi dently say thatpeo ple still know very lit tle about itsef fects on our world. The like li hood that asci en tist fo cus ing on data ob served overthe past few years will prove able to makean ac cu rate pre dic tion of global cli matechange is about equal to the prob a bil itythat a child of three, hav ing barely learnedto stam mer, might sud denly re solve thePy thag o rean The o rem.

So talks about global warm ing as aproven fact are per haps a bit pre ma ture, ifonly be cause there is no sin gle method ofinvestigating this phe nom e non. We mustfirst de velop it, then cre ate an in ter na tionalgroup of re search ers equipped with itsstan dard equip ment and leave them alonefor fifty years.

Only then ask the group to re port itsprog ress and de ci sion, whether the Earth is warmer or colder on the ba sis of long-terminvestigations. That will give at least someba sis for such global con clu sions.

Vet eran law men re turn ing to their dutiesOur mis sion is to ed u cate and

equip sher iffs, peace of fi cers andpub lic of fi cials with the nec es saryin for ma tion and pub lic sup port tocarry out their du ties in ac cor dancewith their Oaths of Of fice.

By Sher iff Rich ard Mackcspoa.org

Back in 1988 I left a job I loved to movehome to Ar i zona to run for Gra ham County sher iff. No body thought I could win, as Ihad never been a cop in Ar i zona or in myhome town and had n’t even lived there fornearly twelve years. I won. Then I ran forre elec tion in 1992. I won again. Soonthere af ter, the Brady bill was signed intolaw by Bill Clinton. Three fed eral agentsshowed up at our AZ Sher iffs As so ci a tionmeet ing and handed us each a doc u mentfrom the De part ment of the Trea sury, whichde tailed what our “or ders” were to com plywith the Brady bill. All the sher iffs wereshocked and against it. How ever, eachsher iff said there was noth ing we could doabout it. “You can’t fight city hall” was thefre quent com ment. I dis agreed and de cided to sue my own gov ern ment. Ev ery bodysaid I was crazy and that I could not win.Six other sher iffs from var i ous parts of theUSA joined the law suit. The case went allthe way to the U. S. Su preme Court and,mir a cle of mir a cles, We won!

To day our coun try is dy ing and theex perts say we’re on the right track or, ifwe are not, there’s noth ing we can do about it. I dis agree; there is some thing we can do! Our “lead ers” con tin u ally urge us to stayon the Ti tanic, count ing on our ig no ranceand ap a thy to keep us aboard. The ques tionsare: 1) Can we save Amer ica? And 2) Willenough peo ple get in volved and ded i catethem selves to make this dream a re al ity?The an swers lie within our grasp and comefrom the coun try’s founding prin ci ples asstated in the Dec la ra tion of In de pend enceand out lined in the Con sti tu tion.

Yes, Amer ica is in deep, deep trou ble.The good news is that there is hope, and myvic tory at the U. S. Su preme Court provesthat only a few who will stand up can makemon u men tal changes. We do not have tojust watch while Amer ica gets de stroyedfrom within. If our coun ties, cit ies andStates and all lo cal of fi cers keep their oaths to pro tect us from tyr anny, we can win thisbat tle to take our coun try back. This is ourplan, our goal and our quest.

We are form ing the Con sti tu tional Peace Of fi cers As so ci a tion, which will unite allpub lic ser vants and sher iffs, to keep theirword to up hold, de fend, pro tect, pre serve

and obey the Con sti tu tions of the UnitedStates of Amer ica. We now have hun dredsof po lice, sher iffs and other of fi cials whohave ex pressed a de sire to be a part of thisHoly Cause of Lib erty. We are go ing totrain and vet them all, State by State, toun der stand and en force the con sti tu tion allypro tected Rights of the peo ple they serve,with an em pha sis on State Sov er eignty andlo cal au ton omy. These lo cal gov ern mentswill is sue our new Dec la ra tion to theFed eral Gov ern ment re gard ing the abusesthat we will no lon ger tol er ate or ac cept.Said dec la ra tion will be en forced by ourCon sti tu tional Sher iffs and Peace Of fi cers. In short, the CSPOA will be the army to setour na tion free. This will guar an tee themove ment re mains both peace ful andef fec tive.

In the Mack/Printz rul ing, the Su premeCourt ruled, “But the Con sti tu tion pro tectsus from our own best in ten tions.” All thatwe lack to make this prin ci ple a re al ity ispeo ple who are de voted enough to make itso. The sher iffs and po lice are the answer.

The Found ers of Amer ica pledged theirlives, their for tunes, and their sa cred honorto es tab lish lib erty here in the USA. Tokeep it, we the Peo ple must do like wise.

Thomas Jef fer son: “Timid men pre ferthe calm of des po tism to the tem pes tu oussea of lib erty.” The CSPOA will unite thesher iffs, po lice and lo cal of fi cials who arewill ing and cou ra geous enough to join usin this “tem pes tu ous sea of lib erty.” I amask ing you to join with us.

“If we fail, we fail while dar ing greatly,so that our pos ter ity will never place usamong those cold and timid souls who

knew nei ther vic tory nor de feat.”For God, Fam ily and Coun try,Sher iff Rich ard MackCSPOA Ex ec u tive Di rec tor

Books by Rich ard MackThe Vic tory for State Sov er eignty –Mack/Printz v. USAMon u men tal Su preme Court casethat re stored the Tenth Amend ment.Abridged. Fore word and sum maryby Sher iff Mack. Quotes of fi cialcourt re cord. (Size: 3¼"x 6")$10 Pack of 5$90 Pack of 50$125 Pack of 100$200 Pack of 200 Free S&H

The County Sher iff – Au dio CDBy pop u lar de mand, the en tire bookis now avail able as au dio CD just

as read by the au thor. $11 + S&H

The County Sher iff – Amer ica’s Last HopeSher iff Mack’s lat est book provesthat the sher iffs in this coun try arein deed the ul ti mate law au thor ityin their re spec tive ju ris dic tions.The sher iff ab so lutely has the powerand re spon si bil ity to de fend cit i zensagainst all en e mies, in clud ing thosefrom our own Fed eral Gov ern ment.His tory, case law, com mon law andcom mon sense de clare a sher iff the peo ple’s pro tec torin all is sues of in jus tice and for keep ing the peace. Heis the last line of de fense for his con stit u ents; he isAmer ica’s last hope to re gain our for got ten free dom.This short but pow er ful book is a must read for allcit i zens, sher iffs and gov ern ment of fi cials that wemay all work to re turn Amer ica to the con sti tu tionalre pub lic she was meant to be. Amaz ing as it might be,the sher iff can make this hap pen! $9 + S&H

From My Cold Dead Fin gersWhy Amer ica Needs GunsSher iff Mack clearly out lines whythe un re stricted right of peo ple asin di vid u als to keep and bear armsis es sen tial to the pres er va tion ofboth in di vid ual lib erty and do mes tictran quil ity, facts once self-ev i dent toAmer i cans, but of ten for got ten within ces sant cries for more gun con trol. Con cise andcom pel ling, this book is an in dis pens able re source for any lover of free dom. Here is one of the most es sen tial books ever writ ten on the Sec ond Amend ment.“Ev ery Amer i can home should have this book in it.”

– G. Gordon Liddy. $12 + S&H

The Proper Role of Law En force mentWhat ev ery cit i zen should know.What ev ery cop should be lieve.“To serve and pro tect” – This time-hon ored mis sion of Amer i can lawen force ment is steadily giv ing wayin po lice de part ments all across thena tion to an ethos of in tim i da tion,mil i tary-style siege, and dis dain forcit i zens’ rights. Rich ard Mack – theman who as sher iff of a ru ral Ar i zona county foughtthe Brady Bill gun-con trol law all the way to theSu preme Court and won – gives an in sider’s glimpseinto the per va sive forces re lent lessly driv ing Amer icato wards a Po lice State. He re counts com ing to re al izeas a beat cop how wrong the too-com mon ori en ta tionof po lice of fi cers is when they think their job is just“to write tick ets and ar rest peo ple.” $9 + S&H

S&H: 1 item $4; 2 items $3; 3 or more shipped free

Or der by mail: P. O. Box 971, Pima, AZ 85543

14 The First Free dom October 2010P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

— Un reg is tered for eign agencies —

Facts of Jew ish me dia con trolaltermedia.info

The world’s me dia are 96% owned byjust six Jew ish com pa nies. How could such a thing come to pass? The power of lies,de cep tion and dis in for ma tion, as Amer i canspay the price of col lec tive stu pid ity.

“You know very well, and the stu pidAmer i cans know equally well, that wecon trol their gov ern ment, ir re spec tive ofwho sits in the White House. You see, Iknow it and you know it that no Amer i canpres i dent can be in a po si tion to chal lengeus even if we do the un think able. What canthey (Amer i cans) do to us? We con trolCon gress, we con trol the me dia, we con trolshow biz, and we con trol ev ery thing inAmer ica. In Amer ica you can crit i cizeGod, but you can’t crit i cize Is rael...”

The larg est me dia con glom er ate to day is Walt Dis ney Com pany, whose chair manand CEO, Mi chael Eisner, is a Jew. TheDis ney Em pire, headed by a man de scribed by one me dia an a lyst as a “con trol freak,”in cludes sev eral tele vi sion pro duc tioncom pa nies (Walt Dis ney Tele vi sion, Touch-stone Tele vi sion, Buena Vista Tele vi sion),its own ca ble net work with 14 mil lionsub scrib ers, and two videopro duc tion com pa nies. As forfea ture films, the Walt Dis neyPic ture Group, headed by JoeRoth (also a Jew), in cludesTouch stone Pic tures, Hol ly -wood Pic tures and Car a vanPic tures. Dis ney also ownsMiramax Films, run by theWeinstein broth ers. When theDis ney Com pany was run bythe Gen tile Dis ney fam ilyprior to its take over by Eisner in 1984, itepit o mized whole some fam ily en ter tain -ment. While it still holds the rights to SnowWhite, un der Eisner the com pany hasex panded into the pro duc tion of graphicsex and vi o lence. In ad di tion, it has 225af fil i ated sta tions in the United States andis part owner of sev eral Eu ro pean TVcom pa nies. ABC’s ca ble sub sid iary ESPNis headed by pres i dent and CEO Ste venBornstein, a Jew. This cor po ra tion also hasa con trol ling share of Life time Tele vi sionand the Arts & En ter tain ment Net workca ble com pa nies. ABC Ra dio Net workowns eleven AM and ten FM sta tions,again in ma jor cit ies such as New York,Wash ing ton, Los An geles, and has over3,400 af fil i ates. Al though pri mar ily atele com mu ni ca tions com pany, Cap i talCit ies/ABC earned over $1 bil lion inpub lish ing in 1994. It owns seven dailynews pa pers, Fairchild Pub li ca tions, ChiltonPub li ca tions, and the Di ver si fied Pub lish ingGroup. Time Warner, Inc., is the sec ondof the in ter na tional me dia le vi a thans. Thechair man of the board and CEO, Ger aldLevin, is a Jew. Time Warner’s sub sid iaryHBO is the coun try’s larg estpay-TV ca ble net work. WarnerMu sic is by far the world’slarg est re cord com pany, with50 la bels, the big gest of which is Warner Broth ers Re cords,headed by Danny Goldberg.Stu art Hersch is pres i dent ofWarnervision, Warner Mu sic’svideo pro duc tion. Goldbergand Hersch are Jews. WarnerMu sic was an early pro moterof “gangsta rap.” Through its

Dis ney CEO Mi chael EisnerSub vert ing the Dis ney leg acy

Ger ald Levin

Pe ter Chernin

in volve ment with Interscope Re cords,it helped pop u lar ize a genre whosegraphic lyr ics ex plic itly urge Blacksto com mit acts of vi o lence againstWhites. In ad di tion to ca ble andmu sic, Time Warner is much in volvedin the pro duc tion of fea ture films(Warner Broth ers) and pub lish ing.Time Warner’s pub lish ing di vi sion(ed i tor-in-chief Nor man Pearlstine, aJew) is the larg est mag a zine pub lisherin the coun try (Time, Sports Il lus trated,Peo ple, For tune). When Ted Turner,a Gen tile, made a bid to buy CBS in1985, there was panic in me dia

board rooms across the na tion. Turner made a for tune inad ver tis ing and then had builta suc cess ful ca ble-TV newsnet work, CNN.

Al though Turner em ployed a num ber of Jews in keyex ec u tive po si tions in CNNand had never taken pub licpo si tions con trary to Jew ishin ter ests, he is a man with alarge ego and a

strong per son al ity and wasre garded by Chair man Wil liamPaley (real name Palinsky, aJew) and the other Jews atCBS as un con trol la ble: a loosecan non who might at sometime in the fu ture turn againstthem. Fur ther more, Jew ishnews man Dan iel Schorr, whohad worked for Turner,pub licly charged that hisfor mer boss held a per sonal Ted Turner

dis like for Jews. To block Turner’s bid,CBS ex ec u tives in vited bil lion aire Jew ishthe ater, ho tel, in sur ance and cig a rettemag nate Laurence Tisch to launch a“friendly” take over of the com pany, andfrom 1986 till 1995 Tisch was the chair manand CEO of CBS, re mov ing any threat ofnon-Jew ish in flu ence there. Sub se quentef forts by Turner to ac quire a ma jornet work have been ob structed by Levin’sTime Warner, which owns nearly 20 per centof CBS stock and has veto power overma jor deals. Viacom, Inc, headed bySum ner Redstone (born Murray Roth-stein), a Jew, is the third larg est megamedia

cor po ra tion in the coun try,with rev e nues of over $10bil lion a year. Viacom, whichpro duces and dis trib utes TVpro grams for the three larg estnet works, owns 12 tele vi sionsta tions and 12 ra dio sta tions.It pro duces fea ture filmsthrough Par a mount Pic tures,headed by Jew ess SherryLan sing. I t s pub l ish ingdi vi sion in cludes Prentice

Hall, Si mon & Schuster, and Pocket Books.It dis trib utes vid eos through over 4,000Block buster stores. Viacom’s chief claimto fame, how ever, is as the world’s larg estpro vider of ca ble pro gram ming, throughits Showtime, MTV, Nick el odeon, andother net works. Since 1989, MTV andNick el odeon have ac quired larger andlarger shares of the youn ger tele vi sionau di ence. With the top three, and by far thelarg est, me dia com pa nies in the hand of

Jews, it is dif fi cult to be lievethat such an over whelm ingde gree of con trol came aboutwith out a de lib er ate, con certedef fort on their part. Whatabout the other big me diacom pa nies? Num ber four onthe list is Rupert Murdoch’sNews Cor po ra tion, whichowns Fox Tele vi sion and 20th Cen tury Fox Films. Murdochis a Gen tile, but Pe ter Chernin,who heads Murdoch’s film

stu dio and also over sees hisTV pro duc tion, is a Jew.Num ber five is the Jap a neseSony Cor po ra tion, whose U. S.sub sid iary, Sony Cor po ra tionof Amer ica, is run by Mi chaelSchulhof, a Jew. Alan Le vine, an other Jew, heads the SonyPic tures di vi sion. Most ofthe TV and movie pro duc tioncom pa nies that are not ownedby the larg est cor po ra tions are alsocon trolled by Jews. For ex am ple, NewWorld En ter tain ment, pro claimed by oneme dia an a lyst as “the pre miere in de pend entTV pro gram pro ducer in the UnitedStates,” is owned by Ron ald Perelman, aJew. The best known of the smaller me diacom pa nies, Dreamworks SKG, is a strictlyko sher af fair. Dream Works was formed in1994 amid great me dia hype by re cord ingin dus try mo gul Da vid Geffen, for merDis ney Pic tures chair man Jeffrey Katzenbergand film di rec tor Ste ven Spielberg, allthree of whom are Jews. The com panypro duces mov ies, an i mated films, tele vi sionpro grams and re corded mu sic. Two other

large pro duc tion com pa nies, MCAand Uni ver sal Pic tures, are bothowned by Seagram Com pany, Ltd.The pres i dent and CEO of Seagram,the li quor gi ant, is Ed gar BronfmanJr., who is also pres i dent of the WorldJew ish Con gress. It is well known thatJews have con trolled the pro duc tionand dis tri bu tion of films since thein cep tion of the movie in dus try in theearly de cades of the 20th cen tury. Thisis still the case to day. Films pro ducedby just the five larg est mo tion pic turecom pa nies men tioned above, Dis ney, Warner Broth ers, Sony, Par a mount(Viacom), and Uni ver sal (Seagram),

ac counted for 74 per cent of the to talbox-of fice re ceipts for the first eightmonths of 1995. The big three in tele vi sion net work broad cast ing used to be ABC,CBS and NBC. With the con sol i da tion ofme dia em pires, these three are no lon gerin de pend ent en ti ties. While they werein de pend ent, how ever, each was con trolledby a Jew since its in cep tion: ABC byLeon ard Goldenson, CBS first by Wil liamPaley and then by Law rence Tisch, andNBC first by Da vid Sarnoff and then byhis son Rob ert. Over pe ri ods of sev eralde cades, these net works were staffed fromtop to bot tom with Jews, and the es sen tialJew ish ness of net work tele vi sion did notchange when the net works were ab sorbedby other cor po ra tions. The Jew ish pres encein tele vi sion news re mains par tic u larlystrong. As noted, ABC is part of Eisner’sDis ney Com pany, and the ex ec u tivepro duc ers of ABC’s news pro grams are allJews: Vic tor Neufeld (20-20), Bob Reich-bloom (Good Morn ing Amer ica), and Rick Kaplan (World News To night). CBS wasre cently pur chased by West ing houseElec tric Cor po ra tion. Nev er the less, theman ap pointed by Law rence Tisch, EricOber, re mains pres i dent of CBS News, and Ober is a Jew. At NBC, now owned byGen eral Elec tric, NBC News pres i dentAn drew Lack is a Jew, as are ex ec u tivepro duc ers Jeff Zucker (To day), JeffGralnick (NBC Nightly News), and NealShapiro (Date line).

EDITOR’S NOTE

It’s grossly un fair that altermedia in this re port re veals only how the Jewsdom i nate ex ec u tive po si tions, whentheir real ge nius is re cruit ing Gen tilesas front men. Al low me to point outhow they groom one. He is given freepas sage to in sult, “ex pose” or ac cuseof trea son any one – ex cept a Jew – ashis star begins ris ing. So the lit mustest for a phony Glenn Beck in thisday of free-for-all hy per bole co mesdown to what he’s not say ing.

The print me diaAf ter tele vi sion news, daily

news pa pers are the mostin flu en tial in for ma tion me diumin Amer ica. Sixty mil lion ofthem are sold (and pre sum ablyread) each day. These mil lions are di vided among some1,500 dif fer ent pub li ca tions.One might con clude that thesheer num ber of dif fer ent

news pa pers across Amer ica would pro vide a safe guard against Jew ish con trol anddis tor tion. How ever, this is not the case.There is less in de pend ence, less com pe ti tionand much less rep re sen ta tion of ourin ter ests than a ca sual ob server wouldthink. The days when most cit ies and eventowns had sev eral in de pend ently ownednews pa pers pub lished by lo cal peo ple with close ties to the com mu nity are gone.To day, most “lo cal” news pa pers are owned by a rather small num ber of large com pa niescon trolled by ex ec u tives who live andwork hun dreds or ever thou sands ofmiles away. The fact is that only about 25per cent of the coun try’s 1,500 pa pers arein de pend ently owned; the rest be long tomulti-news pa per chains. Only a hand fulare large enough to main tain in de pend entre port ing staffs out side their com mu ni ties;the rest de pend on these few for all oftheir na tional and in ter na tional news. TheNewhouse em pire of Jew ish broth ersSam uel and Don ald Newhouse pro videsan ex am ple of more than the lack of realcom pe ti tion among Amer ica’s daily news -pa pers: it also il lus trates the in sa tia bleap pe tite Jews have shown for all the or gans of opin ion con trol on which they couldfas ten their grip. The Newhouses own 26daily news pa pers, in clud ing sev eral largeand im por tant ones, such as the Cleve land

The First Free dom October 2010 15P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

Plain Dealer, the New ark Star-Led ger, andthe New Or leans Times-Pic a yune; thena tion’s larg est trade book pub lish ingcon glom er ate, Ran dom House, with allits sub sid iar ies; Newhouse Broad cast ing,con sist ing of 12 tele vi sion broad cast ingsta tions and 87 ca ble-TV sys tems in clud ingsome of the coun try’s larg est ca ble net works;the Sunday sup ple ment Pa rade, with acir cu la tion of more than 22 mil lioncop ies per week; some two dozen ma jormag a zines, in clud ing the New Yorker,Vogue, Madmoiselle, Glam our, Van ity Fair,Bride’s, Gen tle men’s Quar terly, Self, House& Gar den and all the other mag a zines ofthe wholly owned Conde Nast group. ThisJew ish me dia em pire was founded by thelate Sam uel Newhouse, an im mi grant from

Sam uel Newhouse

Rus sia. The gob bling up ofso many news pa pers by theNewhouse fam ily was in large de gree made pos si ble by thefact that news pa pers are notsup ported by their sub scrib ers,but by their ad ver tis ers. It isad ver tis ing rev e nue – not thesmall change col lected from anews pa per’s read ers – thatlargely pays the ed i tor’ssal ary and the owner’s profit. When everthe large ad ver tis ers in a city choose tofa vor one news pa per over an other withtheir busi ness, the fa vored news pa per willflour ish while its com pet i tor dies. Sincethe be gin ning of the 20th cen tury, whenJew ish mer can tile power in Amer icabe came a dom i nant eco nomic force, therehas been a steady rise in the num ber ofAmer i can news pa pers in Jew ish hands,ac com pa nied by a steady de cline in thenum ber of com pet ing Gen tile news pa perspri mar ily as a re sult of se lec tive ad ver tis ingpol i cies by Jew ish mer chants. Fur ther more,even those news pa pers still un der Gen tileown er ship and man age ment are so thor -oughly de pend ent upon Jew ish ad ver tis ing rev e nue that their ed i to rial and newsre port ing pol i cies are largely con strainedby Jew ish likes and dis likes. It holds true in the news pa per busi ness as else where thathe who pays the piper calls the tune.

Three Jew ish news pa persThe sup pres sion of com pe ti tion and the

es tab lish ment of lo cal mo nop o lies on thedis sem i na tion of news and opin ion havechar ac ter ized the rise of Jew ish con trolover Amer ica’s news pa pers. The re sult ingabil ity of the Jews to use the press as anun op posed in stru ment of Jew ish pol icycould hardly be better il lus trated than bythe ex am ples of the na tion’s three mostpres ti gious and in flu en tial news pa pers: the New York Times, the Wall Street Jour naland the Wash ing ton Post. These three,dom i nat ing Amer ica’s fi nan cial andpo lit i cal cap i tals, are the news pa perswhich set the trends and the guide lines fornearly all the oth ers. They are the ones who de cide what is news and what is n’t, at thena tional and in ter na tional lev els.

They orig i nate the news;the oth ers merely copy it,and all three news pa pers are in Jew ish hands.

The New York Times was founded in1851 by two Gen tiles, Henry Ray mondand George Jones. Af ter their deaths, itwas pur chased in 1896 from Jones’s es tateby a wealthy Jew ish pub lisher, AdolphOchs. His great-grand son, Ar thur OchsSulzberger, Jr., is the pa per’s cur rentpub lisher and CEO. The ex ec u tive ed i tor is Max Frankel, and the man ag ing ed i tor isJo seph Lelyveld. Both of the lat ter are alsoJews. The Sulzberger fam ily also owns,through the New York Times Co., 33 othernews pa pers, in clud ing the Boston Globe;twelve mag a zines, in clud ing Mc Call’s andFam ily Cir cle with cir cu la tions of morethan 5 mil lion each; seven ra dio and TVbroad cast ing sta tions; a ca ble-TV sys tem;and three book pub lish ing com pa nies. TheNew York Times News Ser vice trans mits

news sto ries, fea tures, and pho to graphsfrom the New York Times by wire to 506other news pa pers, news agen cies andmag a zines. Of sim i lar na tional im por tanceis the Wash ing ton Post, which, by es tab -lish ing its “leaks” through out gov ern mentagen cies in Wash ing ton, has an in sidetrack on news in volv ing the Fed eralgov ern ment. The Wash ing ton Post, like the New York Times, had a non-Jew ish or i gin.It was es tab lished in 1877 by StilsonHutchins, pur chased from him in 1905 byJohn McLean, and later in her ited byEd ward McLean. In June 1933, how ever,at the height of the Great De pres sion, thenews pa per was forced into bank ruptcy. Itwas pur chased at a bank ruptcy auc tion byEu gene Meyer, a Jew ish fi nan cier. The

Wash ing ton Post is now runby Kath er ine Meyer Gra ham,Eu gene Meyer’s daugh ter.She is prin ci pal stock holderand the board chair man of theWash ing ton Post Com pany.In 1979, she ap pointed herson Don ald pub lisher of thepa per. He now also holds theposts of pres i dent and CEO of the Wash ing ton Post Com pany.

The Wash ing ton Post Com pany has manyother me dia hold ings in news pa pers, TVand mag a zines, most no ta bly the na tion’snum ber-two weekly newsmagazine, News- week. The Wall Street Jour nal, which sells1.8 mil lion cop ies each week day, is thena tion’s larg est-cir cu la tion daily news pa per.It is owned by Dow Jones & Com pany,Inc., a New York cor po ra tion which alsopub lishes 24 other daily news pa pers andthe weekly fi nan cial tab loid Barron’s,among other things. The chair man andCEO of Dow Jones is Pe ter Kann, who is aJew. Kann also holds the posts of chair manand pub lisher of the Wall Street Jour nal.

Pe ter Kann

Most of New York’s otherma jor news pa pers are in nobetter hands than the NewYork Times and the Wall Street Jour nal. The New York DailyNews is owned by Jew ish real-es tate de vel oper Mortimer B.Zuckerman. The Vil lage Voiceis the per sonal prop erty ofLeon ard Stern, the bil lion aireJew ish owner of the HartzMoun tain pet sup ply firm.

Other mass me diaThe story is pretty much the same for

other me dia as it is for tele vi sion, ra dio,and news pa pers. Con sider, for ex am ple,newsmagazines. There are only three ofany note pub lished in the United States:Time, Newsweek, and U. S. News and WorldRe port. Time, with a weekly cir cu la tion of4.1 mil lion, is pub lished by a sub sid iary ofTime Warner Com mu ni ca tions. The CEOof Time Warner Com mu ni ca tions, asmen tioned above, is Ger ald Levin, a Jew.Newsweek, as men tioned above, is pub lishedby the Wash ing ton Post Com pany, un derthe Jew ess Kath er ine Meyer Gra ham. Itsweekly cir cu la tion is 3.2 mil lion. U. S.News & World Re port, with a weeklycir cu la tion of 2.3 mil lion, is owned andpub lished by Mortimer Zuckerman, a Jew.Zuckerman also owns the At lan tic Monthlyand New York’s tab loid news pa per, theDaily News, which is the sixth-larg estpa per in the coun try. Among the gi ant book-pub lish ing con glom er ates, the sit u a tion isalso Jew ish. Three of the six larg est bookpub lish ers in the U. S., ac cord ing toPub lisher’s Weekly, are owned or con trolledby Jews. The three are first-place Ran domHouse (with its many sub sid iar ies, in clud ingCrown Pub lish ing Group), third-placeSi mon & Schuster, and sixth-place Time

Warner Trade Group (in clud -ing Warner Books and Lit tle,Brown). An other pub lisher ofspe cial sig nif i cance is West ernPub lish ing. Al though it ranksonly 13th in size among allU. S. pub lish ers, it ranks firstamong pub lish ers of chil dren’sbooks, with more than 50per cent of the mar ket. Itschair man and CEO is Rich ardSnyder, a Jew, who has just

re placed Rich ard Bernstein, also a Jew.

Jew ish me dia con trolThese are the facts of Jew ish me dia

con trol in Amer ica. Any one will ing tospend sev eral hours in a large li brary canver ify their ac cu racy. I hope that these facts are dis turb ing to you, to say the least.Should any mi nor ity be al lowed to wieldsuch awe some power? Cer tainly, not andal low ing a peo ple with be liefs such asex pressed in the Tal mud to de ter minewhat we get to read or watch in ef fect gives this small mi nor ity the power to mold ourminds to suit their own Tal mudic in ter ests,in ter ests which as we have dem on stratedare di a met ri cally op posed to the in ter estsof our peo ple. By per mit ting the Jews tocon trol our news and en ter tain ment me dia,we are do ing more than merely giv ingthem a de ci sive in flu ence on our po lit i calsys tem and vir tual con trol of ourgov ern ment; wealso are giv ingthem con trol of theminds and soulsof our chil dren,whose at ti tudes and ideas are shaped moreby Jew ish tele vi sion and Jew ish films thanby their par ents, their schools or any otherin flu ence.

WantedThink ersSur vi vors

The First Free dom is spread ing “hate!” whine

those who mis ap pre hend us sur vi vors. It’s re allyout of pity that we try so hard to de-pro gram the

brain washed. Or der a box of 100 ex tra cop ies for

$25 or $30 on page 24 and help dis trib ute the truth.

It’s now dif fi cult to get ex e cuted in NCBy Don ald Sullivan

aloe910@aol.com

Lately there’s no way you are go ing topay the ul ti mate price in the Tarheel State.First, there is the new “Ra cial Jus tice Act”al lowing re con sid er a tion of death pen altycases where ra cial bias dur ing the trial andsen tenc ing pro ceed ings can be ar gued. Ofcourse ev ery Black, Mes tizo, In dian andnon-White man on death row will jump onthat one. It’s an other suc cess story for thear gu ably never ratified 14th Amendment.

So far, just in my neck of the woods fivecon victed mur der ers have jumped on thisband wagon, all Black of course, ex cept forone who claims to be a “Na tive Amer i can”(but is in fact a Ne gro). Their vic tims: a62-year-old White woman tor tured tore veal her ATM pin for drug money but theNe gro man killed her any way; a 17-year-old Ne gro boy shot in the head over a $50drug debt by a Ne gro man; a 17-year-oldWhite boy kid napped, robbed and mur deredwith a shot gun by a Ne gro man over a $25co caine debt; an 8-year-old Ne gro boy anda 30-year-old Ne gro man shot by the sameNe gro man; and a 71-year-old Ne gro manbeaten to death by an other Ne gro man.

It does n’t seem log i cal that any of thesecases can claim ra cial bias, as the mur dersare still mur ders; and the pen alty for that inthis State is death by le thal in jec tion.

“Where’s the Beef?” 159 in di vid u als siton Death Row in North Carolina. What doyou bet that we will have 159 ra cial biasclaims by court-ap pointed, tax payer-paidat tor neys by year’s end? Close, but only152 took the bait by the dead line, likely allwith court-ap pointed at tor neys. The otherseven must have been self-pay, and theap peal would have cost too much.

Sec ond, and this is re ally a juicy tid bit,the State Bu reau of In ves ti ga tion standsac cused of hid ing ev i dence, twist ing re portsand even cre at ing ev i dence in or der to getcon vic tions in high and low pro file cases.While in some sit u a tions it ap pears thework per formed by the agency is merelysloppy, in many oth ers it is, at the least,

grossly neg li gent, and at worst crim i nalfraud. Es ti mates fore see many doz ens ofcases af fected over a pe riod of nearly twode cades. The cost to tax pay ers and in sur ers in this State will eas ily reach the bil lionsfor law suits, re-in ves ti ga tions and re-tri als. Many con victed de fen dants will most likelybe freed out right, or re leased pend ing newtri als.

Kick ing off this in ves ti ga tion of theSBI’s bad hab its was the 1993 mur der of are tired school teacher by a then 29-year-old se verely re tarded man. An SBI agent hadcre ated a de tailed, six-page con fes sion,one elab o rate de tail stacked on an other,signed by a man who even to day can notre cite the al pha bet be yond the let ter “K.”The ac cused was re leased in 2007 af ter 14years in a State men tal in sti tu tion. TheAt tor ney Gen eral, Dem o crat Roy Coo per,sat on it with full and com plete knowl edgeof the de tails for at least six years. It’s notthe only one; he is the same “Roy Coo per”who threw out the Duke La crosse Teamhoax case two years ago, also doc tored upby the State’s in ves ti ga tors.

It ap pears “SBI agents have cut cor ners,bul lied the vul ner a ble and twisted re portsand court tes ti mony when the truththreat ened to un der mine their cases, a[Ra leigh] News and Ob server in ves ti ga tionof the SBI’s work, pol i cies and prac ticesre veals” (Wilmington Star-News, 8/9/10).The SBI’s ba sic train ing man ual tells agentshow to work with pros e cu tors and helpthem im prove their cases in ways such asiden ti fy ing weak nesses in their cases andsup ply ing as sis tance to bol ster those ar eas.

This State’s “CSI” labs have hid denfind ings that con tra dicted the pros e cu tion’spo si tion on cases, align ing them selves soclosely to pros e cu tors that ev i dence hasbeen ma nip u lated to sup port the State’scases, in clud ing the ever-pres ent “bloodev i dence” re ports. Tests per formed by theSBI blood pat tern an a lysts have beenproven “un sci en tific,” faulty and evenfraud u lent. Re ports have been al tered tosup port pros e cu tion the o ries. Ju ries andex perts in the field of blood anal y sis havebeen shocked at the bla tant dis re gard ofnor mal de cency and com mon sense bythese agents of the State. Blood ev i dencehas been mis rep re sented and crit i cal noteshave been kept from de fense at tor neys. Anin de pend ent re view re ported 190 casesbe tween 1987 and 2003 where fi nal labre ports omit ted ev i dence that con tra dictedpre lim i nary tests which in di cated blood atthe crime scenes. Three of those casesre sulted in ex e cu tions and in clude themur der of Mi chael Jor dan’s fa ther, amongoth ers.

Early re ports ap pear to have the State’sleg is la ture lean ing to wards mak ing theSBI labs in de pend ent from the State’s lawen force ment agency. One can only hopethat pri vat iza tion may again lead to anim prove ment in how the gov ern ment doesits work.

While we’ve known for years we couldnot trust our gov ern ment, and es pe cially its law en force ment growth in dus try alongwith the courts, now it’s a mat ter of pub licre cord in North Carolina. It will provein ter esting to see just what the State does to the guilty agents in this fi asco. So far, theyhave all been pro moted and de fended overthe years, in clud ing the At tor ney Gen eral.

Too bad the Bixbys don’t live in NorthCarolina, for SLED is even worse than ourSBI. From the facts, it would ap pear theBixbys could n’t use the “Ra cial Bias Act”:Steve was ac cused of kill ing one Black and one White Sher iff’s dep uty. A com pletelyun bi ased shoot, I would say. Un for tu nate,but unbiased.

— Un reg is tered for eign agencies —

— The In ter na tional Jew —16 The First Free dom October 2010P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

Back when this in ven tor/writerwarned Amer ica to be ware of theJews, they had n’t yet bought mostof “our” so-called rep re sen ta tives.

By Henry FordThe Dear born In de pend ent

30 Oc to ber 1920 – The Jews have com -plained that they are be ing mis rep re sented. It is their usual com plaint. They are al waysbe ing “mis rep re sented” and “per se cuted”ex cept when they are be ing praised forwhat they are not. If the Jews were fullyun der stood by the Gen tiles, if the Chris tian churches, for ex am ple, were freed from theirde lu sion that the Jews are Old Tes ta mentpeo ple, and if the churches re ally knewwhat Tal mudic re li gion is, it is likely the“mis rep re sen ta tion” would be still stron ger.

The down fall of Rus sia was pre paredby a long and de lib er ate pro gram ofmis rep re sen ta tion of the Rus sian peo ple,through the Jew ish world press and Jew ishdip lo matic ser vice. The name of Po landhas been drawn in filth through the press of the United States un der Jew ish in sti ga tion,most of the sign ers of the lat est Jew ishpro test against The Dear born In de pend ent’sar ti cles be ing lead ers in the vil i fi ca tion ofPo land, whose sole crime is that she wishes to save her self from the Jews. All this realmis rep re sen ta tion is re garded as the Jews’priv i lege.

But wher ever a hand has been raised topre vent the Jews over run ning the peo pleand se cretly se cur ing con trol of the ma jorin stru ments of life, the Jews have raisedthe cry of “mis rep re sen ta tion.” They nevermeet the ques tion out right. They are notmeet ing it now. They can not meet itwith out con fes sion. False de ni als, pleas for sym pa thy, and an un wor thy at tempt to linkoth ers with them in their fall, con sti tutetheir whole method of de fense.

Free ma sons may won der how theycome into this af fair, as they see the nameof their an cient or der cou pled with that ofthe Jews in the lat est Jew ish de fense. It isall very eas ily un der stood by those who are ac quainted with Jew ish strat egy dur ing thetwo cen tu ries which com prise mod ernMasonic his tory.

Twice in the his tory of the United States, the peo ple have been aroused by a sense ofstrange in flu ences op er at ing in their af fairs,and each time the real power be hind thein flu ences was able to di vert sus pi cion to theFree ma sons. Once in George Wash ing ton’stime, once in Pres i dent Ad ams’ time thisoc curred. Books were writ ten, ser monspreached, news pa pers took up the search,but none of the ob serv ers saw the Jew ishin flu ence there. George Wash ing ton knewthat the dis loyal in flu ence was not Masonic,but he saw signs of the con cealed powertry ing to op er ate un der the guise ofMa sonry. Pres i dent Ad ams had not so clear a view of the mat ter.

Ma sonry emerged un stained be cause itwas guilt less of sub ver sive pur poses. Apseudo-Ma sonry, of French or i gin, givento athe is tic and rev o lu tion ary pur poses,strongly pa tron ized by Jews, was thedis turb ing el e ment, but all that the pub licwas able to see was the Masonic si mil i tudeand not the Jew ish hand. A re cru des cenceof this mis rep re sen ta tion of the Ma sonsoc curred also in 1826, and from then un tilthe other day, when the Lead ers of Amer i canJewry linked the name of Free ma sonrywith their own, the name of the Or der hasbeen un scathed.

This is to serve no tice on the lead ers ofAmer i can Jewry that this time they will notbe per mit ted to hide be hind the name ofMa sonry, nor will they be per mit ted tohold up the name of Ma sonry as a shieldto blunt the darts or as an ally to share theshafts aimed at their sub ver sive pur poses.That game has suc ceeded twice in theUnited States; it will never suc ceedagain. Free ma sonry is not and never wasim pli cated in what the Jew ish ca bal hashad in mind. And Free ma sons ev ery where

Dis raeli, Brit ish Pre mier, por trays the Jews

are aware of the facts.It is a cu ri ous fact that just as the Jews

have sought to op er ate through the Ma sons and then leave that Or der to take the bruntof the en su ing as sault, so also have they attimes sought to op er ate through the Je su its, play ing the same trick with that name andOr der. If the Je su its and the Ma sons wouldcom pare notes, they could both re port thesame thing. Jews have sought to use both,and have been frus trated, al though incon se quence the names of both Or dershave suf fered for a time.

This is one of the co in ci dences be tweenthe Pro to cols and the facts: the Pro to colsex press them selves as against both theMa sons and the Je su its, but will ing to useboth to at tain Jew ish pur poses.

Both these or ders are well able to takecare of them selves, once they know thekey to the Jew ish plan. But there is muchin for ma tion on these mat ters of which thepub lic is not aware, and at a fu ture date astudy may be made of the his tor i cal ef fortsof the Jews to use and de stroy Free ma sonry.Such a study will be use ful in show ing how Jew ish in flu ence op er ated in a day whenthe peo ple had no means of iden ti fy ing it as Jew ish. The peo ple at tacked the thing theysaw, but what they saw was not the sourceof the el e ment they op posed. Prog ress hasbeen made at least to this ex tent, thatnow a days, more than at any pre vi ous time,the world plan of the Jews is known andrec og niz able.

The main pur pose of the pres ent ar ti cle,how ever, is to show the reader that theJews have not been mis rep re sented, themeans of show ing this be ing a pre sen ta tion of the Jews by a no ta ble Jew whom theJews are de lighted to honor.

Benjamin Dis raeli, who was Earl ofBea cons field and prime min is ter of GreatBrit ain, was a Jew and glo ried in it. Hewrote many books, in a num ber ofwhich he dis cussed his peo ple in an ef fortto set them in a proper light. The Brit ishGov ern ment was not then so Jew ish as ithas since be come, and Dis raeli was eas ilyone of the great est fig ures in it.

In his book, Coningsby, there ap pears aJew ish char ac ter named Sido nia, in whoseper son al ity and through whose ut ter ances,Dis raeli sought to pres ent the Jew as hewould like the world to see him.

Sido nia first an nounces his race toyoung Coningsby by say ing, “I am of thatfaith that the Apos tles pro fessed be forethey fol lowed their Mas ter,” the only placein the whole book where the “faith” ismen tioned. Four times, how ever, in thebrief pref ace to the fifth edi tion, writ ten in1849, the term “race” is used in ref er enceto the Jews.

In the first con ver sa tion be tween thesetwo, Sido nia re veals him self as a greatlover of power, and dis courses charm inglyof the pow er ful men of his tory, end ing inthis way:

“Aquaviva was Gen eral of theJe su its, ruled ev ery cab i net in Eu rope and col o nized Amer ica be fore hewas thirty-seven. What a ca reer!”ex claimed the stranger (Sido nia),

ris ing from his chair and walk ing upand down the room; “the se cret swayof Eu rope!” (p. 120. The ref er encesare to Longman’s edi tion pub lishedin 1919. The ital ics are ours.)Tak ing up a study of the char ac ter of

Sido nia the Jew, Dis raeli the Jew be gins tore fer to the Jews as “Mo saic Arabs.” If amod ern writer were to de scribe the Jewsthus, vir tu ally as Arabs of the Mo saicper sua sion, it would be de nounced asan other at tempt at “per se cu tion,” butDis raeli did this a num ber of times, hispur pose ev i dently be ing to give the Jew his proper set ting as to his orig i nal po si tionamong the na tions. Again he re fers to themas “Jew ish Arabs.” Both of these termsmay be found on page 209.

Dis raeli also gives voice to the feel ing,which ev ery Jew has, that who ever op posesthe Jew is doomed. This is a feel ing whichis strongly en trenched in Chris tians also,that some how the Jews are the “cho senpeo ple” and that it is dan ger ous to op posethem in any thing. “The fear of the Jews” isa very real el e ment in life. It is just as realamong the Jews as among non-Jews. TheJew him self is bound in fear to his peo ple,and he ex er cises the fear of the cursethrough out the sphere of re li gion – “I willcurse them that curse thee.” It re mains tobe proved, how ever, that op po si tion to thede struc tive ten den cies of Jew ish in flu encesalong all the prin ci pal av e nues of life is a“curs ing” of the Jews. If the Jews werere ally Old Tes ta ment peo ple, if they werere ally con scious of a “mis sion” for thebless ing of all na tions, the very things inwhich they of fend would au to mat i callydis ap pear. If the Jew is be ing “at tacked,” itis not be cause he is a Jew, but be cause he isthe source and life of cer tain ten den ciesand in flu ences, which, if they are notchecked, mean the de struc tion of a moralso ci ety.

The per se cu tion of the Jew to whichDis raeli re fers is that of the Span ishIn qui si tion, which rested on re li giousgrounds. Trac ing the Sido nia fam ilythrough a trou bled pe riod of Eu ro peanhis tory, our Jew ish au thor notes:

“Dur ing the dis or ders of the Pen in su larWar… a ca det of the youn ger branch of thisfam ily made a large for tune by mil i tarycon tracts, and sup ply ing the com mis sar iatof the dif fer ent ar mies.” (p. 212.) Cer tainly.It is a truth un as sail able, ap pli ca ble to anype riod of the Chris tian Era, that “per se cuted”or not, “wars have been the Jews’ har vests.”They were the first mil i tary com mis sar ies.If this young Sido nia in sup ply ing “thedif fer ent ar mies” went so far as to sup plythe op pos ing ar mies, he would be fol low ingquite per fectly the Jew ish method ashis tory re cords it.

“And at the peace, pre scient of the greatfi nan cial fu ture of Eu rope, con fi dent in thefer til ity of his own ge nius, in his orig i nalviews of fis cal sub jects, and his knowl edge of nat u ral re sources, this Sido nia… re solvedto em i grate to Eng land, with which he had,in the course of years, formed con sid er able com mer cial con nec tions. He ar rived hereaf ter the peace of Paris, with his largecap i tal. He stakes all that he was worth onthe Waterloo loan; and the event made himone of the great est cap i tal ists in Eu rope.

“No sooner was Sido nia es tab lished inEng land than he pro fessed Ju da ism…

“Sido nia had fore seen in Spain that,af ter the ex haus tion of a war of twenty-five years, Eu rope must re quire cap i tal to carryon peace. He reaped the due re ward of hissa gac ity. Eu rope did re quire money andSido nia was ready to lend it to Eu rope.France wanted some; Aus tria more: Prus siaa lit tle; Rus sia a few mil lions. Sido niacould fur nish them all. The only coun trywhich he avoided was Spain…” (p. 213.)

Here the prime min is ter of Great Brit ain,from the wealth of his tra di tions as a Jewand the height of his ob ser va tion as primemin is ter, de scribes the method of the Jewin peace and war, ex actly as oth ers have

tried to de scribe it. He puts for ward thesame set of facts as oth ers put forth, but hedoes it ap par ently for the Jews’ glo ri fi ca tion,while oth ers do it to en able the peo ple tosee what goes on be hind the scenes in warand peace. Sido nia was ready to lendmoney to the na tions. But where did heget it, in or der to lend it? He got it from thena tions when they were at war! It was thesame money; the fi nan ciers of war and thefi nan ciers of peace are the same, and theyare The In ter na tional Jews, as BenjaminDis raeli’s book for the glo ri fi ca tion ofJewry am ply tes ti fies. In deed, he tes ti fieson the same page just quoted:

“It is not dif fi cult to con ceive that, af terhav ing pur sued the ca reer we have in ti matedfor about ten years, Sido nia had be comeone of the most con sid er able per son ages in Eu rope. He had es tab lished a brother, or anear rel a tive, in whom he could con fide, inmost of the prin ci pal cap i tals. He was lordand mas ter of the money mar ket of theworld, and of course vir tu ally lord andmas ter of ev ery thing else.”

This co mes as near be ingThe In ter na tional Jew asany thing can be, but theJews glory in the pic ture. Itis only when a non-Jew ishwriter sug gests that per hapsit is not good for so ci ety thata Jew ish co te rie should be“lord and mas ter of themoney mar ket of the world,” and as a con se quence “lordand mas ter of ev ery thingelse,” that the cry of “per se -cu tion” arises.

Strangely enough, it is in this book ofthe Brit ish pre mier that we come uponhis rec og ni tion of the fact that Jews hadin fil trated into the Je su its’ or der.

“Young Sido nia was for tu nate in thetu tor whom his fa ther had pro cured forhim, and who de voted to his charge all there sources of his trained in tel lect and vastand var i ous er u di tion. A Je suit be fore therev o lu tion; since then an ex iled Lib eralleader; now a mem ber of the Span ishCortes; Rebello was al ways a Jew. He foundin his pu pil that pre coc ity of in tel lec tualde vel op ment which is char ac ter is tic of theAra bian or ga ni za tion.” (p. 214.)

Then fol lowed in young Sido nia’s ca reeran in tel lec tual mas tery of the world. Hetrav eled ev ery where, sounded the se cretsof ev ery thing, and re turned with the worldin his vest pocket, so to speak – a manwith out il lu sions of any sort.

“There was not an ad ven turer in Eu ropewith whom he was not fa mil iar. No min is terof State had such com mu ni ca tion withse cret agents and po lit i cal spies as Sido nia.He held re la tions with all the cleverout casts of the world. The cat a log ofhis ac quain tances in the shape of Greeks,Ar me ni ans, Moors, se cret Jews, Tar tars,Gyp sies, wan der ing Poles and Carbonari,would throw a cu ri ous light on those sub -ter ra nean agen cies of which the world ingen eral knows so lit tle, but which ex er ciseso great an in flu ence on pub lic events…The se cret his tory of the world was hispas time. His great plea sure was to con trastthe hid den mo tive, with the pub lic pre text,of trans ac tions.” (pp. 218-219.)

Here is The In ter na tional Jew, full dress; he is the Protocolist too, wrapped inmys tery, a man whose fin gers sweep all the strings of hu man mo tive, and who con trolsthe chief of the bru tal forces – Money. Ifa non-Jew had limned a Sido nia, sotruth fully show ing the ra cial his tory andchar ac ter is tics of the Jews, he would havebeen sub jected to that pres sure which theJews ap ply to ev ery truth-teller aboutthem selves. But Dis raeli could do it, andone some times won ders if Dis raeli was not,

— The In ter na tional Jew — The First Free dom October 2010 17P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

af ter all, writ ing more than a ro mance, writ ingin deed a warn ing for all who can read.

The quo ta tion just given is not the de scrip tion ofSido nia only; it is also a de scrip tion – save for thehigh cul ture of it – of cer tain Amer i can Jews who,while they walk in the up per cir cles, have com mercewith the “ad ven tur ers” and with “the se cret agentsand po lit i cal spies,” and with the “se cret Jews,” and with those “sub ter ra nean agen cies of which theworld in gen eral knows so lit tle.”

This is the strength of Jewry, this com mercebe tween the high and the low, for the Jew knowsnoth ing dis rep u ta ble within the cir cle of Jew ish ness.No Jew be comes an out cast, what ever he may do; aplace and a work await him, what ever his char ac ter.

There are highly placed per sons in New Yorkwho would rather not have it known what theycon trib uted to the “ad ven turer” who left New Yorkto over turn Rus sia; there are other Jews who would rather not have it printed how much they know of“se cret agents and po lit i cal spies.” Dis raeli did morethan draw Sido nia; he por trayed The In ter na tionalJew as he is found also in Amer ica.

Thus far Sido nia is de scribed from the out side.But now he be gins to speak for him self, and it isin be half and praise of the Jews. He is dis cuss ingthe dis crim i na tion prac ticed against his peo ple inEng land. It is the old story. Ev ery where, even in the United States, the same story. Cry ing for pity whileusurp ing power! “We poor Jews” wails a NewYork multi-mil lion aire at whose fin ger leg is la torsquail and even Pres i dents of the United States grow re spect ful.

The fol low ing quo ta tion was writ ten in 1844:Brit ons must be im pressed with its un cannypar al lel to their af fairs to day: it is Sido niaspeak ing –

“…yet, since your so ci ety has be comeag i tated in Eng land, and pow er ful com bi -na tions men ace your in sti tu tions, you findthe once loyal He brew in vari ably ar rayedin the same ranks as the lev el ler andlat i tu di nar ian, and pre pared to sup port the pol icy which may even en dan ger his lifeand prop erty, rather than tamely con tinueun der a sys tem which seeks to de gradehim.”

Con sider that. “Lat i tu di nar i an ism” isthe doc trine of the Pro to cols in a word. It isa break-up by means of a wel ter ofso-called “lib eral” ideas which con structnoth ing them selves, but have power tode stroy the es tab lished or der.

Note also Dis raeli’s an swer to theques tion some times asked, “If the Jewssuf fer un der Bolshevism, why do theysup port it?” or the Jew ish spokes men’sform of it – “If we are so pow er ful, why dowe suf fer in the dis or der of the world?” Thedis or der is al ways a step to a new de gree ofJew ish power. Jews suf fer will ingly forthat. But even so, they do not suf fer as thenon-Jews do. The So vi ets per mit re lief toen ter Rus sia for the Jews. In Po land, the“starv ing war-suf fer ers” are able to glut allavail able ships in tak ing high-pricedpas sage to Amer ica. They are not suf fer ing as other peo ple are, but, as Dis raeli sees,they are will ing to suf fer be cause they seein ev ery break down of Gen tile so ci ety anew op por tu nity for the Jew ish power todig nearer the cen tral seat of power.

Just how the Jew works to break downthe es tab lished or der of things, by means of ideas, as the Pro to cols claim, is shown inthis same con ver sa tion of Sido nia:

“The To ries lose an im por tant elec tionat a crit i cal mo ment; ’tis the Jews comefor ward to vote against them. The Churchis alarmed at the scheme of a lat i tu di nar ianuni ver sity, and learns with re lief that fundsare not forth com ing for its es tab lish ment; a Jew im me di ately ad vances and en dows it.”

If these words had been writ ten by anon-Jew, the cry of anti-Sem i tism wouldring through the land. They are true, nei thermore nor less true, be cause writ ten by aJew. And Sido nia adds:

“And ev ery gen er a tion they must be comemore pow er ful and more dan ger ous to theso ci ety that is hos tile to them.” (Thesequo ta tions from page 249.)

Well, sev eral gen er a tions have passedsince these words were writ ten. The Jewstill re gards ev ery form of non-Jew ishso ci ety as hos tile to him. He or ga nizes

strongly against so ci ety. And, if Dis raeli isto be taken as a prophet, his words re main– “they must be come more pow er ful andmore dan ger ous.” They have be come more pow er ful. Whoso would mea sure thedan ger, look around.

Let the charm ing Sido nia pro ceed withhis rev e la tions:

“I told you just now that I was go ingup to town to mor row, be cause I al waysmade it a rule to in ter pose when af fairs ofState were on the car pet. Oth er wise I neverin ter fere. I hear of peace and war innews pa pers, but I am never alarmed, ex ceptwhen I am in formed that the Sov er eignswant trea sure; then I know that mon archsare se ri ous.”

It will be re mem bered that Sido nia heldno gov ern men tal po si tion. The time hadnot come for that. Power was ex er cisedbe hind the scenes long be fore the crav ingfor the spot light was grat i fied. But whether there be Jews in of fice or not, the powerthey ex er cise be hind the scenes is al waysgreater than the power they show in theopen. It can be seen, there fore, that the morenu mer ous they are in of fice, the greatertheir se cret power. Sido nia con tin ues:

“A few years back we were ap plied to by Rus sia. Now there has been no friend shipbe tween the Court of St. Pe ters burg and myfam ily. It has Dutch con nec tions which havegen er ally sup plied it; and our rep re sen ta tionsin fa vor of the Pol ish He brew, a nu mer ousrace, but the most suf fer ing and de graded of

This Brit ish Prime Min is ter was al ways on the money: Benjamin Disraeli

all the tribes, have not been very agree ableto the Czar. How ever, cir cum stances drew toan ap prox i ma tion be tween the Romanoffsand the Sidonias. I re solved to go my selfto St. Pe ters burg. I had, on my ar rival, anin ter view with the Rus sian Min is ter ofFi nance, Count Cancrin; I be held the sonof a Lith u a nian Jew.

“The loan was con nected with the af fairsof Spain; I re solved on re pair ing to Spainfrom Rus sia. I trav eled with out in ter mis sion.I had an au di ence im me di ately on myar rival with the Span ish Min is ter, SenorMendizabel; I be held one like my self, theson of a Nuevo Christiano, a Jew of Aragon.

“In con se quence of what tran spired atMa drid, I went straight to Paris to con sultthe Pres i dent of the French Coun cil; Ibe held the son of a French Jew, a hero, anim pe rial mar shal…”

If Sido nia were trav el ing to day he wouldfind whole groups of Jews, where, in hisday, he found one, and he would find themin ex alted places. Sup pose Dis raeli werealive to day and should re vise Coningsby,in clud ing the United States in the tour ofthis money mas ter of the world! What ahost of Jew ish names he could gather fromof fi cial cir cles in Wash ing ton and NewYork – such a host, in deed, as makes theoc ca sional Gen tile look like a for eignerwho had been gra ciously per mit ted tocome in by the Jews!

“The con se quence of our con sul ta tionswas, that some north ern power should be

ap plied to in a friendly and mediativeca pac ity. We fixed on Prus sia; and thePres i dent of the Coun cil made an ap pli ca tionto the Prus sian Min is ter, who at tended afew days af ter our con fer ence. Count Arnimen tered the cab i net, and I be held a Prus sian Jew.”

Sido nia’s com ment upon all this isof fered as an ad dress to ev ery reader of this ar ti cle:

“So, you see, my dear Coningsby, thatthe world is gov erned by very dif fer entper son ages from what is imag ined by those who are not be hind the scenes.” (pp. 251-252.)

It is in deed! Why not let the world seebe hind the scenes for a lit tle?

And now for the most il lu mi nat ing linesDis raeli ever wrote – lines which halfcom pel the thought that maybe, af ter all, he was writ ing to warn the world of Jew isham bi tion for power:

“You never ob serve a great in tel lec tualmove ment in Eu rope in which the Jews donot greatly par tic i pate. The first Je su itswere Jews. That mys te ri ous Rus sianDi plo macy which so alarms West ernEu rope is or ga nized and prin ci pally car riedon by Jews. That mighty rev o lu tion whichis at the mo ment pre par ing in Ger many,and which will be, in fact, a sec ond andgreater Ref or ma tion, and of which so lit tle isyet known in Eng land, is en tirely de vel op ingun der the aus pices of Jews.” (p. 250.)

Amer i can Jews say that the Pro to colsare in ven tions. Is Benjamin Dis raeli anin ven tion? Was this Jew ish Prime Min is terof Great Brit ain mis rep re sent ing hispeo ple? Are not his por tray als taken as true his tory? And what does he say?

He shows that in Rus sia,the very coun try where theJews com plained they wereleast free, the Jews were incon trol.

He shows that the Jews know thetech nique of rev o lu tion, fore tell ing in hisbook the rev o lu tion that later broke outin Ger many. How did he fore know it?Be cause that rev o lu tion was de vel op ingun der the aus pices of Jews, and, though itwas then true that “so lit tle is yet knownin Eng land,” Dis raeli the Jew knew it,and knew it to be Jew ish in or i gin andde vel op ment and pur pose.

One point is sure: Dis raeli told the truth. He pre sented his peo ple be fore the worldwith cor rect ness. He limns Jew ish power,Jew ish pur pose and Jew ish method with acer tainty of touch that be to kens more thanknowl edge – he shows ra cial sym pa thyand un der stand ing. He sets forth the factswhich this se ries is set ting forth. Why didhe do it? Was it boast ful ness, that dan ger ousspirit in which the Jew gives up most of hisse crets? Or was it con science, im pel linghim to tell the world of Ju dah’s de signs?

No mat ter; he told the truth. He is oneman who told the truth with out be ingac cused of “mis rep re sent ing” the Jews.

Iran blames U. S. for Afghan drug prob lemrebelnews.org

23 Sep tem ber, PressTV – Iran’s For eign Min is ter Manouchehr Mottaki has blamedin creased drug pro duc tion and traf fick ingin Af ghan i stan on the U. S.-led war in thatcountry.

Mottaki said in a ses sion with Ex ec u tive Di rec tor of the United Na tions Of fice onDrugs and Crime (UNODC) Yuri Feodorthat the pres ence of for eign forces inAf ghan i stan was the main rea son be hindthe in creas ing rate of drug pro duc tion in

the coun try.“Those coun tries in Af ghan i stan over the

past ten years must be held re spon si ble forthe un be liev able growth of drug pro duc tionfrom 300 to 900 tons. It should be madeclear whose hands are be hind this spike,”IRNA quoted Mottaki as say ing.

Mottaki elab o rated on Iran’s anti-drugpro duc tion and traf fick ing ac tiv i ties andex pressed the coun try’s readi ness toex pand co op er a tion with UN or ga ni za tions in the fight against il licit drugs. Feodor forhis part praised Iran’s ac tiv i ties in thisre gard and wel comed Mottaki’s pro posalto hold sem i nars about links be tween drugtraf fick ing and ter ror ism.

The poppy pro duc tion and drug busi nessin Af ghan i stan has come at a heavy cost for neigh bor ing Iran. With a 900-ki lo me ter(560-mile) com mon bor der, Iran has beenused as the main con duit for smug gling Manouchehr Mottaki

Afghan drugs to drug deal ers in Eu rope.The drug trade orig i nat ing in Af ghan i stan

has claimed the lives of more than 3,000Ira nian po lice of fi cers over the past 30 years.

The FirstFree dom

is for some one you know.

so

Let’s roll!

18 The First Free dom October 2010P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

— Set ting the re cord straight —

The fol low ing true ac count, pub lished again re cently by Truth At Last Books of Marietta, Geor gia – the citywhere it hap pened – re minds us to dis re gard the lat estpro pa ganda from the usual sus pects claim ing in a newbook that he did n’t do it. Leo Frank, duly con victed ofrape-mur der, in spite of all the se cret hand shakes thatmoney could buy, got ex actly what he de served.

Leo Frank, age 29, was con victed and sen tenced to death for thebru tal rape-mur der of 13-year-old Mary Phagan in 1913. Frankcame from a wealthy Brook lyn fam ily. He was hired by the NewYork mil lion aire Jew, Adolph Montag, to run the Na tional Pen cilFac tory in At lanta. Frank was the pres i dent of the At lanta chap ter ofB’nai B’rith, the se cret Jew ish busi ness men’s fra ter nity. Af ter thesur pris ing com mu ta tion of his death sen tence by Gov er nor JohnSlaton, a group of lead ing cit i zens of Marietta, Geor gia, took mat tersinto their own hands and lynched Frank. He is the only Jew everlynched in Amer i can his tory. Down through this day or ga nizedJewry has sought to re write the his tory of this case to erase Frank’sguilt and damn the peo ple of Geor gia for the hang ing while claim ing that the Ne gro jan i tor was guilty.

And The Dead Shall Rise Again is the lat est book seek ing toex on er ate Leo Frank. It was writ ten by Steve Oney, (whose wife is aJew). He gives Bill Kenney, as so ci ate ed i tor of the Marietta DailyJour nal, credit for the back ground on the case. How ever, nei therOney, nor the At lanta Jour nal-Con sti tu tion re veal that Kenney statespos i tively that Frank is guilty! Kenney even once wrote an ar ti cleen ti tled, “If Frank Were Tried To day – He Would Still Be FoundGuilty!”

Facts of the Leo Frank caseCon fed er ate Me mo rial Day, Sat ur day,

April 26, 1913, lit tle Mary Phagan, 13, ofMarietta, went to the Na tional Pen cilFac tory in down town At lanta to pick upher pay en ve lope of $1.20 for one week’swork. This was a real sweat-shop wherewomen and chil dren la bored for 10¢ an

hour. Mary’s friend, Helen Fer gu son, hadsought to pick up Mary’s money as she hadin the past but Frank re fused, “No, she must pick it up her self!”

Mary ar rived at 12:05 PM ac cord ing toFrank who said that he paid her – how evershe would never be seen alive again.Sev eral fe male work ers would later tes tifythat Frank had a habit of sex u ally ha rass ing em ploy ees. At 4:00 PM, the Black nightwatch man, Newt Lee, ar rived at work. Anag i tated Frank told him to leave and re turnat 6:00 PM. Lee asked if he could sleep inthe base ment. Frank said no. (Im por tant:This was to al low more time to cre mate thebody.) Frank would tell the po lice that hewas in his of fice “ev ery min ute” from noon to 12:45 PM. How ever, Monteen Stoverswore that she ar rived at the fac tory at12:10 for her pay but Frank was not in hisof fice. She looked down the fac tory halland did not see him. She waited for somefive min utes and then left.

Frank threat ened sui cideLater Frank’s Black cook, Minola

McKnight, in the pres ence of her law yer,gave the po lice this sworn state mentde scrib ing Frank’s be hav ior upon his

re turn home that day:“Mr. Frank did n’t rest so good Sat ur day

night; he was drunk and would n’t let her(his wife) sleep with him, and she said sheslept on the floor on the run by the bedbe cause Mr. Frank was drink ing. She saidSunday that Mr. Frank told her Sat ur daynight that he was in trou ble, and that hedid n’t know the rea son why he wouldmur der, and told his wife to get his pis toland let him kill him self.”

(Note: Af ter Frank was ar rested it wouldbe two weeks be fore his wife would go tothe jail to visit him!)

Three days later Minola would re pu di atethis state ment af ter re ceiv ing a pay raisefrom the Frank fam ily. How ever, herhus band, Al bert McKnight, would tes tifythat on that Sat ur day eve ning he came tosee his wife and no ticed that Frank wasvery ner vous and un able to eat din ner. The

pros e cu tor, Hugh M. Dorsey, con vinced ofFrank’s guilt, noted that Frank had phonedNewt Lee at 7:00 to ask if ev ery thing wasO.K. at the fac tory. Hehad never done thisbe fore. Lee dis cov eredMary’s body at 3:00 AM

and called the po licewho, in turn, phonedFrank. How ever, he did not an swer. When theyreached his house, Frankwas ex tremely ner vous.They asked if he knewMary Phagan and twice Frank would an swer –“I don’t think so!” Butadded that he wouldhave to look at the

pay roll book first. Frank had pre paredher pay roll for more than one year andem ploy ees tes ti fied he spoke to Mary byname!

Mary Phagan’s death wasbru tal and tor tur ous

Of fi cer Boots Rog ers de scribed theirvisit to the Frank home: “Frank’s voice was hoarse and trem bling and ner vous andex cited. He looked pale, could not get histie tied, talked very rapid in ask ing whathap pened.”

When taken to the morgue, Frank would not look at the body. He said that he did n’tknow the girl but thought he paid her onSat ur day. He said to be sure he would haveto check the re cords.

The young girl had been bru tally rapedand stran gled. There was blood, urine anddis charge in her pant ies. There were bitesmarks on her left shoul der and neck. Therewas a half inch wound on the back of herhead ex pos ing her skull. Fi nally there wasa rope around her neck – she had beengar roted to death. Blood spots and hair ofMary’s color would be found near a pen cilma chine. With no DNA or other mo demfo ren sic meth ods, any con nec tion withMary could only be guessed but Mary’smother said it was hers!

The case was bro ken when the Blackjan i tor, Jim Conley, came for ward and toldthe po lice that Frank had him carry thebody to the base ment and prom ised him$200 to cre mate it in the fur nace. Frank had dic tated two notes writ ten down by Conley which were de signed to ap pear as if fromthe dy ing girl plac ing the blame on, “a tallblack Ne gro.”

It is of in ter est that there has not beenan other mur der case in U. S. his tory inwhich a Ne gro has mur dered a fe male,of any race, and then sat down be sidethe body to write notes seek ing to blamea third party!

Leo Frank in court on trial for mur der – with wife Lu cille

Mary Phagan, only age 13, in 1913was fiend ishly mur dered!

Pros e cu tor Hugh Dorsey would beelected Gov er nor of Geor gia.

Leo Frank – photo taken in jail

Jim Conley’s tes ti mony was dev as tat ing!He said that Frank would have pros ti tutesvisit him on Sat ur days. Conley would letthem in and lock the door. Frank, on thesec ond floor, would stomp on the floorwhen it was the “right” woman and Conley would lock the door. When Frank wasfin ished with her, he would whis tle andConley would un lock the door to let thepros ti tute out. He tes ti fied that on Sat ur day,April 16th, he saw Mary Phagan en ter andgo up stairs. This was fol lowed by Monteen Stover who shortly there af ter left.

New York Jews con trib utedto Frank’s de fense

Frank’s de fense at tor ney, Lu ther RosserJr., spent three days try ing to break Conley’s

Jim Conley never wa veredun der three days of cross-ex am i na tion.

Jews make hero out of mur der-rap ist Leo Frank

Attorney Lu ther Rosser used ev erytrick in the book to save Leo Frank.

tes ti mony but failed. Frank would make alengthy “un sworn state ment” to the juryand re fused to be cross-ex am ined. It tookthe jury only two hours to come back witha guilty ver dict. Judge Leon ard Roansen tenced Frank to death by hang ing thenext day.

The case was ap pealed to both theGeor gia Su preme Court where the ver dictwas af firmed and then to the U. S. Su preme Court and it was again af firmed.

Frank’s le gal team had the sup port ofor ga nized Jewry na tion wide. Huge sumswere raised for his de fense. Then Geor gia’sout go ing Gov er nor, John Slaton, on his last day in of fice, com muted Frank’s sen tenceto life in prison.

Tom Wat son said frank’scom mu ta tion could not stand

Tom Wat son, writ ing in his weekly,The Jef fer so nian, cried out to the peo pleof Geor gia:

“Our grand old Em pire State has beenraped. We have been vi o lated and we areashamed. Jew money has de based us,bought us, and sold us and laughs at us.Bought and sold! Cried off at the auc tionblock and knocked down to big money.ONE LAW FOR THE RICH, ANDANOTHER FOR THE POOR!

“What Geor gians can now deny it?Mary Phagan, pur sued andtempted, and en trapped, and thenkilled when she would not do whatso many other girls had done forthis Jew ish hunter of Gen tilegirls. There she lies at Marietta,unavenged by the law. In their(Jews) eyes, she was le git i mateprey; and with their un lim itedmoney and in vis i ble power, theyhave es tab lished the pre ce dent inGeor gia that no Jew shall suf fercap i tal pun ish ment for a crimecom mit ted against a Gen tile! Inthe name of God, what are thepeo ple to do?”

(See page 21, “Knights of MaryPhagan,” for Marietta’s an swer.)

— Con front ing the problem — The First Free dom October 2010 19P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

So lu tion to un end ing Mid eastcri ses may lie in first Jew ishhome land

By Mi chael Col lins PiperAmercanFreePress.net

A grow ing num ber of pro po nents of ajust peace in the Mid dle East view whathas been called the “Birobidjan Op tion”as the fi nal (and eq ui ta ble) so lu tion tothe on go ing prob lem of Pal es tine, whereJew ish set tlers from Eu rope and the United States (and from other coun tries) dis placed na tive Arabs (Chris tian and Mus lim alike)and es tab lished the State of Is rael in 1948.

Among the most prom i nent of thosepub li ciz ing the Birobidjan so lu tion to theMid dle East cri sis is Lady Michele Renouf,the glam or ous Brit ish tele vi sion per son al itywhose forth right ad vo cacy of free dom ofthought and ex pres sion has led her intodi rect con fron ta tion with forces in the pro-Is rael lobby de ter mined to si lence any andall opin ion (or his tor i cal facts) that con flict with its agenda. (For more on the ef forts ofLady Renouf, see her jailingopinions.comwebsite.)

What then is Birobidjan and how does itre late to the prob lems of the Mid dle East?The fact that few peo ple know is that in1928 there was es tab lished (un der aus pices of the So viet Un ion) the first-ever mod ernJew ish State known col lo qui ally asBirobidjan (also spelled “Birobidzhan”)lo cated on the bor der of Rus sia and China,not far from the Pa cific Ocean.

Birobidjan was the first ter ri to rial-ad -min is tra tive en tity in the world des ig natedfor the Jew ish peo ple on the ba sis of theirJew ish na tion al ity. In short, Is rael was notthe first Jew ish state. Birobidjan was – andit was in ex is tence years be fore Is rael came into being.

Jews world wide were in vited to comevol un tarily to this Jew ish home land, knownof fi cially as the Jew ish Au ton o mousRe gion, and many did, in clud ing more than 1,000 Jews from out side the So viet Un ion.

And the lan guage of the Ash ke naziJew ish peo ple – Yid dish – was made theof fi cial lan guage of this Jew ish state. [Theword “Yid dish” (Juden Deut sche) means“Jew ish Ger man” and is, in short, pid ginGer man with a Jew ish slant. East ernYid dish is char ac ter ized by the ad mix tureof more Slavic words. Yid dish is, how ever, writ ten in the He brew al pha bet. – Ed.]

Amer i can Jew ish or ga ni za tions lenttheir sup port to this pro ject, in clud ing“Ambidjan” – the Amer i can BirobidjanCom mit tee – whose of fi cials in cludedAl bert Ein stein and the prom i nent Amer i canJew ish au thor B. Z. Goldberg.

This first Jew ish State of the 20thcen tury pre ceded the birth of Is rael inPal es tine by more than 20 years. Yet, in1948, Is rael was es tab lished, in the wake of much blood shed and de struc tion rainedupon the Chris tian and Mus lim peo ples ofPal es tine.

Since then mil lions of dis placedPal es tin ians, forced from their homes,have strug gled to sur vive, many liv ing inopen-air ghet toes that are no more thanwhat are known as con cen tra tion camps.This ugly his tory is well known to smallnum bers of peo ples across the planet, butstill re mains a mys tery to Amer i cans.

To day there are those – in clud ing thiswriter – who ad vo cate the peace fulre lo ca tion of the Jews now in Pal es tine toBirobidjan.

Mike Piper in ter views Michele Renouf

Lady Renouf has as sessed what couldbe ac com plished by a re ju ve nated Jew ishState in Birobidjan: “By re set tling Jews inthe orig i nal pre-Is rael home land, Pal es tinecould be re stored to its right ful own ers, thevic tims of the 20th cen tury’s lon gest, mostno to ri ous and en dur ing in jus tice.”

In fact, to day Birobidjanis a vir tual Jew ish par a dise.The home of two syn a gogues,Birobidjan City has 77,250in hab it ants. Yid dish the atersopened in the 1970s. Yid dishand Jew ish tra di tions havebeen re quired com po nents inall pub lic schools for al most15 years, taught not as Jew ishex ot ica but as part of there gion’s na tional her i tage.”

The Birobidjan Syn a gogue, com pletedin 2004, is next to a com plex hous ingSunday School class rooms, a li brary, amu seum and ad min is tra tive of fices. Thebuild ings were of fi cially opened in 2004 to mark the 70th an ni ver sary of the found ingof the Jew ish Au ton o mous Oblast (JAR).Con cern ing the Jew ish com mu nity of there gion, Gov er nor Nikolay Mikhaylovich

Volkov stated that he in tends to“sup port ev ery valu able ini tia -tive main tained by our lo calJew ish or ga ni za tions.”

In 2007, the First BirobidjanIn ter na tional Sum mer Pro gram

for Yid dish Lan guage and Cul ture waslaunched by Yid dish stud ies pro fes sorBoris Kotlerman of Bar-Ilan Uni ver sity.For the Chanukah cel e bra tion of 2007,of fi cials of Birobidjan in the Jew ishAu ton o mous Oblast claimed to havebuilt the world’s larg est me no rah. TheBirobidjan Jew ish Na tional Uni ver sityworks in co op er a tion with the lo calre li gious com mu nity. The uni ver sity isunique in the Rus sian Far East. The ba sisof the train ing course is study of theHe brew lan guage, his tory and clas sicJew ish texts.

The town now boasts sev eral State-runschools that teach Yid dish, as well as anAn glo-Yid dish fac ulty at its higher ed u ca -tion col lege, a Yid dish school for re li giousin struc tion and a kin der gar ten. The five-toseven-year-olds spend two les sons a weeklearn ing to speak Yid dish, as well as be ingtaught Jew ish songs, dance and tra di tions.The school me no rah was cre ated in 1991.It is a pub lic school that of fers a half-dayYid dish and Jew ish cur ric u lum for thosepar ents who choose it. About half theschool’s 120 pu pils are en rolled in theYid dish course. Many of them con tinue onto Pub lic School No. 2, which of fers thesame half-day Yid dish/Jew ish cur ric u lumfrom first through 12th grade. Yid dish alsois of fered at Birobidzhan’s Ped a gog i cal

Birobidjan City’s main square

“Birobidjan was the first ter ri to rial-ad min is tra tiveen tity in the world des ig nated for the Jew ish peo ple onthe ba sis of their Jew ish na tion al ity. In short, Is rael wasnot the first Jew ish state.”

In sti tute, one of the only uni ver sity-levelYid dish courses in Rus sia. To day, the city’s 14 pub lic schools must teach Yid dish andJew ish tra di tion.

Ad vo cates of the Birobidjan op tion forsolv ing the Mid dle East cri sis say that firststeps would in clude for mal rec og ni tion ofBirobidjan as the world’s only self-gov ern -ing Jew ish State and that ar eas of theMid dle East now known as “Is rael,” “Gaza”and the “West Bank” would con sti tute thenew State of Pal es tine. Nat u rally, the UnitedNa tions and the United States (in par tic u lar)as well as other na tions and en ti ties thathave been con cerned with the Mid dle Eastwould pro vide all nec es sary as sis tance forthe re lo ca tion of Jews now liv ing in Is raelto Birobidjan and en cour age all na tionsable to as sist to do so.

Some peo ple of good will have gone sofar as to sug gest that U. S. for eign aid andGer man na tional Ho lo caust rep a ra tionspay ments ear marked for Is rael be re di rectedto the pur pose of air lift ing from Pal es tineall Jew ish in hab it ants to Birobidjan and the trans fer of all of their per sonal pos ses sions;that aid money be used for the con struc tion of homes for the Jew ish im mi grants toBirobidjan. In the fu ture, aid and rep a ra tionspre vi ously ear marked for Is rael would bere di rected to Birobidjan.

The whole is sue is sub ject to de bate, butthose who view Birobidjan as an an swer tothe Mid dle East con flict gen er ally con cludeit pro vides a hu mane pro posal that cannur ture the first-ever Jew ish home landand bring a fi nal so lu tion to the en dur ingprob lem of Pal es tine.

Amer i can Free Pressis the weekly news pa per out of Wash ing ton, DC,that rose from its ashes when they shut down TheSpot light. Tired of wait ing a whole month for TFFto ar rive? Sub scribe to this also-truth ful tab loid,52 is sues crammed into 47 weeks of the year plussix free is sues of Whole Body Health for $59.

Amer i can Free Press, Ste 100645 Penn syl va nia Ave SE

Wash ing ton DC 20003

Cri tique of a crim i nally crit i ciz ing cultBy Olaf Childressfirstfreedom@gulftel.com

Please in dulge The First Free dom, yetagain, to ex plain why we’re gain ing whilethe mediacracy con tin ues los ing cred i bil ity and there fore in flu ence. This cy cle is notnew. Surely you’ve heard of the shep herdboy who mis chie vously yells “Wolf!” once too of ten. More re li able the sen try’s re portthat it’s “Twelve o’clock and all is well!” or this news pa per’s re search and pub li ca tionof much that’s not ex actly so be nign as theKo sher pa pers would have you be liev e.

Most Amer i cans think they know, first,which lit tle eth nic ity herds the money andthe me dia out right, and, sec ond, that its“Holo smokes!” cries will keep those twois sues un as sail able for ever – which is buthalf right at best. Let us remember that theout comes we don’t an tic i pate ex ceed suchones as we do wisely plan ahead for. Or,quot ing Rob ert Burns once again: “There’s many a slip ’twixt the cup and the lip.”

The idea is slowly catch ing on. In vitedto speak at last month’s SCV meet in Foley, I did n’t name the en emy out right, but didin tro duce the pre mises of this news pa per:Self-gov ern ment be gins at home; make alllo cal and State pub lic of fi cials honor theiroaths of of fice; do not vote for ei ther wingon the Dis trict of Cor rup tion’s Republocrat ptero dac tyl, nor get taken in by the Mo bileReg is ter or the Pensacola Jour nal, as bothare will ing pro pa gan dists for that bird; and, it’s to won der why pride in our own race,though not for ev ery other on the planet, ismys te ri ously for bid den by your SCV at the na tional level – which does not en dorseThe First Free dom.

Dur ing my sojourn at Camp Pendleton,long be fore the Holo smok ers be gan theirSex Ed and con doms pro gram for chil dren, a Navy Corps man lec tured us Ma rines onab sti nence, i.e., the health risks posed byca sual en coun ters. “And don’t come to thedis pen sary with a drip tell ing us you got itfrom a toi let seat,” he ad mon ished. “Onlyone per cent of ve ne real dis eases get caught in such manner, and that’s re served forNavy Chap lains!”

So we must not pro claim the vir tues ofour own kind at any of their or ga ni za tionalmeet ings ex pect ing the mediacracy to obey its hal looed fair ness doc trine, as only twoper cent of the peo ple may prac tice eth nicsep a ra tion, and that’s set aside for the onescry ing “Wolf!” in sym phonic uni son.

Here be gins an ex cel lent ac count of how the lat ter keep a great many oth ers herdedse curely into their sheepfold.

The Cul ture of Cri tiqueRe viewed by Stan ley Hornbeck

In The Cul ture of Cri tique, Dr. KevinMac Don ald ad vances a care fully re searchedbut ex tremely con tro ver sial the sis: thatcer tain 20th cen tury in tel lec tual move ments– largely es tab lished and led by Jews –have changed Eu ro pean so ci et ies infun da men tal ways and de stroyed thecon fi dence of West ern man. He claimsthat these move ments were de signed,con sciously or un con sciously, to ad vanceJew ish in ter ests even though they werepre sented to non-Jews as uni ver sal ist icand even uto pian. He con cludes that thein creas ing dom i nance of these ideas has hadpro found po lit i cal and so cial con se quences

that bene fited Jews but caused great harmto gen tile so ci et ies. This anal y sis, whichhe makes with con sid er able force, is anun usual in dict ment of a peo ple gen er allythought to be more sinned against thansin ning.

The Cul ture of Cri tique is the fi nal ti tlein Pro fes sor Mac Don ald’s mas sive, three-vol ume study of Jews and their role inhis tory. The two pre vi ous vol umes areA Peo ple That Shall Dwell Alone andSep a ra tion and its Dis con tents, pub lishedby Praeger in 1994 and 1998. The se ries iswrit ten from a sociobiological per spec tivethat views Ju da ism as a unique sur vivalstrat egy that helps Jews com pete with othereth nic groups. Pro fes sor Mac Don ald,who is a psy chol o gist at the Uni ver sity ofCal i for nia at Long Beach, ex plains thisper spec tive in the first vol ume, whichde scribes Jews as hav ing a very pow er fulsense of unique ness that has kept themso cially and ge net i cally sep a rate fromother peo ples. The sec ond vol ume tracesthe his tory of Jew ish-gen tile re la tions, andfinds the causes of anti-Sem i tism pri mar ily in the al most in vari able com mer cial andin tel lec tual dom i nance of gen tile so ci et iesby Jews and in their re fusal to as sim i late.The Cul ture of Cri tique brings his anal y sisinto the pres ent cen tury, with an ac countof the Jew ish role in the rad i cal cri tique oftra di tional cul ture.

The in tel lec tual move ments Pro fes sorMac Don ald dis cusses in this vol ume areMarx ism, Freud ian psy cho anal y sis, theFrank furt school of so ci ol ogy, and Boasian an thro pol ogy.

[This re view con tin ues next month.]

20 The First Free dom October 2010P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

— Me dia by pass operation —

FBI an thrax in ves ti ga tion is it self sub ject of probewhatreallyhappened.com

AFTER YEARS of ques tion ing thecon c lu s ion and meth ods o f an FBIin ves ti ga tion into the 2001 an thrax at tacksthat killed five peo ple and sick ened doz ens of oth ers, U. S. Rep.Rush Holt (D-NJ) toldus last month that theU. S. Gov ern mentAc count abil ity Of fice(GAO) is open ingan in quiry into themat ter.

Holt, along with ahand ful of other leg is la tors, had sent alet ter to the GAO in May re quest ing anin ves ti ga tion into the FBI’s han dling of the case. The FBI of fi cially closed the case in

U. S. Rep. Rush Holt

Feb ru ary af ter con clud ing in 2008 that Dr.Bruce Ivins, a for mer biodefense sci en tist,was the sole cul prit in the at tacks.

Ivins was the third sus pect named bythe FBI, af ter Dr. Ayaad Assaad andDr. Ste phen Hatfill. The FBI de cided Dr.Bruce Ivins was the cul prit af ter Dr. Ivinsdied in a sus pi cious sui cide and could nolon ger speak out in his own de fense. Therea son the FBI should be in ves ti gated isbe cause, for all the ruin they made of thelives of the above named three men, theFBI went out of its way to not in ves ti gateDr. Philip Zack, the one man ac tu allycaught by the se cu rity sys tem en ter ing thelab where the an thrax used in the let terswas sent from, with out au tho ri za tion andaf ter hav ing lost his job at the lab over a

WantedThink ersSur vi vors

The First Free dom is spread ing “hate!” whine those who mis ap pre hend us sur vi vors. It’s re ally

out of pity that we try so hard to de-pro gram the

brain washed. Or der a box of 100 ex tra cop ies for$25 or $30 on page 24 and help dis trib ute the truth.

ra cially-mo ti vated at tack on the above Dr.Assaad.

ISLAMOPHOBIA FLASHBACK:

Those darned Mus lims!It was n’t Mus lims who trained

their cam eras on the WTC prior tothe first air craft im pact

By Ty ler Durden

With all the “chat ter” out there, fromAmer ica’s so-called in tel li gence com mu nityand gov ern ment at top lev els that are filledwith dual-Is raeli-Amer i can cit i zen ship, toZi on ist shills on ABCNNBCBS, FOX,NPR, NY Times or the Wash ing ton Post toIs raeli war mon gers like their CRIMEMINISTER Bennie Nuttyahoo warn ing of

an other “al CIA duh” at tack, it might betime to look back at some facts.

The next ter ror ist at tack against theUSA will be cour tesy of the same ruth lessmob of li ars, thieves, mur der ers and conart ists that pulled off 9/11.

Fort Detrick’s an thrax mys tery9/11 pro pa ganda hav ing in un dated us

on that fa tal date, in these more so ber ingtimes let us re view what first ap peared inthe Jan u ary 26, 2002, is sue of Sa lon. – ed.

Who tried to frame Dr. AyaadAssaad, a for mer biowarfarere searcher at the Army lab? Was itthe same per son re spon si ble forlast fall’s an thrax mail ter ror ism?

By Laura Rozensa lon.com

THURMONT, Md. – On Oct. 2, AyaadAssaad, a U. S. gov ern ment sci en tist andfor mer biowarfare re searcher, re ceived acall from an FBI agent ask ing him to comein for a talk. It was well be fore an thraxpanic gripped the na tion – in fact, it was the same day that photo ed i tor Rob ert Stevens,63, was ad mit ted to a Florida hos pi tal. Itwas n’t un til the next day that Stevens wasdi ag nosed with in ha la tion an thrax, andan other two days later, on Oct. 5, when hewould be come the first of five even tualfa tal i ties caused by the ap par ent bioterroristat tack.

The day af ter hear ing from the FBI,Assaad met with spe cial agents J. Greg oryLelyegian and Mark Buie in the FBI’sWash ing ton field of fice, along withAssaad’s at tor ney, Rose mary McDermott.They showed Assaad a de tailed, un signed,com puter-typed let ter with a star tlingac cu sa tion: that the 53-year-old Assaad, an En vi ron men tal Pro tec tion Agency sci en tistwho filed an age dis crim i na tion suitagainst the U. S. Army for dis miss inghim from a biowarfare lab, might be abioterrorist.

“Dr. Assaad is a po ten tial bi o log i calter ror ist,” the let ter stated, ac cord ing toAssaad and McDermott. The let ter wasre ceived by the FBI in Quantico, Va., butAssaad did not learn from the FBI where ithad been mailed from. “I have worked with Dr. Assaad,” the let ter con tin ued, “and Iheard him say that he has a ven dettaagainst the U. S. gov ern ment and that ifany thing hap pens to him, he told his sonsto carry on.”

Ac cord ing to Assaad, “The let ter-writerclearly knew my en tire back ground, mytrain ing in both chem i cal and bi o log i calagents, my se cu rity clear ance, what floorwhere I work now, that I have two sons,what train I take to work, and where I live.

“The let ter warned the FBI to stop me,”he said.

Af ter their meet ing, Assad was thankedby the FBI agents, who have not con tactedhim since. The bu reau says it clearedAssaad of the anon y mous al le ga tionsagainst him.

“We re ceived an anon y mous let ter withcer tain al le ga tions about Dr. Assaad,”Chris Murray, an FBI spokes man, toldSa lon Thurs day. “Our in ves ti ga tion hasde ter mined those al le ga tions are un founded.Our in ves ti ga tion is com plete. Pe riod.” But Assaad be lieves there is a pos si ble linkbe tween the per son who sent the un signedlet ter to the FBI and the ter ror ist who sentan thrax to Dem o cratic pol i ti cians and

prom i nent mem bers of the me dia.

Who ever it was seemed todis play ee rie fore know ledgeof the bi o log i cal at tacks, sincethe let ter was sent to the FBIwell be fore any an thraxter ror at tacks were known to the pub lic.

And there is also the fact that Assaadused to work at the U. S. Army’s Med i calRe search In sti tute for In fec tious Dis eases(USAMRIID), in Fort Detrick, Md., abiowarfare lab many crit ics be lieve mighthave been the source of the sto len an thrax.Ac cord ing to in ter nal Army doc u ments inAssaad’s own pos ses sion (and first re ported about in the Hart ford Cou rant), 27spec i mens, in clud ing an thrax, Ebola andthe hantavirus were lost in the early 1990sfrom the lab. The doc u ments paint acha otic pic ture of a poorly man aged lab.

Assaad had his own un happy ex pe ri enceat the lab: Be fore he was dis missed, he hadrun-ins with col leagues, once fil ing a ra cial dis crim i na tion com plaint against some ofthem. And he be lieves that if the let ter-writer was some one who at one pointworked at the lab, it would ex plain why heknew so much about Assaad and wouldthink that Assaad would make an easytar get to frame.

“I’m the per fect scape goat,” Dr. Assaadex plained. “I’m Arab-Amer i can. I’m asci en tist who knows about bi o log i caland chem i cal agents. I’m su ing the U. S.Army,” he said. “Who ever did this clearlywants re venge.”

There is no proof that for mer col leaguesof Assaad at the Fort Detrick fa cil ity werebe hind the at tempt to frame him or thean thrax mail ings. But there is no doubt that se cu rity at the lab was no to ri ously sloppy.And gov ern ment in ves ti ga tors hunt ing forthe an thrax mail ter ror ist are re port edlylook ing at the lab as a pos si ble source ofthe toxin.

Assaad worked for eight years, from1989-97, at the Army-run lab, where ci vil ianand mil i tary sci en tists with top se cu rityclear ances han dle the most le thal bi o log i calagents known. Assaad’s ten ure at the labwas not a par tic u larly happy one. He was

ul ti mately dis missed from the lab in 1997,along with six other older sci en tists, whenthe lab an nounced it needed to down sizebe cause of bud get re stric tions. But Assaaddis putes that rea son in his age dis crim i na tionsuit, which is still pend ing. He shared withSa lon cop ies of Army in ter nal doc u ments,ob tained un der the Free dom of In for ma tionAct by Assaad’s at tor ney, that are from theArmy’s own in ves ti ga tion into al le ga tionsof ra cial dis crim i na tion brought by Assaad.

But he is not alone in his con cerns abouthis for mer col leagues. An other sci en tistwho worked at the lab at the time – andwho ad mits to hav ing been part of a groupin the lab that called it self the “CamelClub,” or ga nized as a kind of drink ing club that on the side rid i culed the Egyp tian-born Assaad – said he also be lieves that the an thrax in the re cent ter ror scare camefrom Fort Detrick’s USAMRIID.

“As soon as it came out” about thean thrax let ters, “the first thing that cameto my mind was Fort Detrick,” said thesci en tist, who re quested an o nym ity and isnow em ployed in ac a de mia. “I don’t knowhow many labs are uti liz ing an thrax fromDetrick. Detrick rep re sents a re pos i tory ofmany or gan isms, and they would send it out to var i ous other labs. A lot of peo ple whowere work ing on an thrax in this coun trygot their an thrax from Fort Detrick.”

The sci en tist also claimed that heun der stood DNA anal y sis be ing per formed by a pri vate lab in Rockville, Md., hadal ready de ter mined that the source of thean thrax in the let ter sent to Ver mont Sen.Pat rick Leahy was from Detrick. How ever, the pri vate lab has told jour nal ists that itwill be an other two weeks to a monthbe fore they pub licly re veal their re sults.

Ac cord ing to in ter views with Assaadand this sci en tist, along with ad di tionalArmy in ves ti ga tive tran scripts ob tained bySa lon, the Army’s biowarfare re search labin the early 1990s was an or ga ni za tionaldi sas ter area. A big prob lem at the lab,which ap par ently con trib uted to spec i mens go ing miss ing, was that af ter the Gulf War,USAMRIID de cided to phase out worksome sci en tists had been do ing on pro jectsthat the Army lab no lon ger con sid eredcru cial to their core mis sion of re search ingvac cines against bioweapons. Manysci en tists who had been en gaged in other

pro jects, such as Lt. Col. Phil Zack, whohad been re search ing the sim ian immuno-de fi ciency vi rus (SIV), were ea ger tocon tinue work ing on pro jects USAMRIIDsaid they should stop. What fol lowed, thedoc u ments re veal, were sci en tists sneak ing into the Army biowarfare lab to work onpet pro jects af ter-hours and on week ends,for mer work ers like Zack, who left in 1991,still be ing let in to do lab work, pres sureap plied to tech ni cians to help out, doc u mentsgo ing miss ing, and de lib er ate mis la bel ingof spec i mens among other ef forts to hideun sanc tioned lab work.

Lt. Col. Mi chael Lang ford, an Armysci en tist who be came head of theUSAMRIID ex per i men tal pa thol ogydi vi sion in Feb ru ary 1992, was in ter viewedby a USAMRIID in ves ti ga tor in the springof 1992. The tran scripts of that and otherin ter views re veal shock ing lapses ofse cu rity and re sis tance to over sight byUSAMRIID lab sci en tists, in clud ing some of the same ones who en gaged in ha rass mentof Assaad.

“At the time I took over the Ex per i men talPa thol ogy branch on the 3rd of Feb ru ary[1992] it was ob vi ous to me that there waslit tle or no or ga ni za tion of that group andlit tle or no ac count abil ity of many things,”Lang ford told the Army in ves ti ga tor, Col.Thomas J. Tay lor.

Lang ford de scribes walk ing in to workone morn ing and see ing a group of labsci en tists and tech ni cians hud dled be hindclosed doors in the room that houses anelec tron mi cro scope. What Lang fordcon cluded was that cer tain sci en tists wereco vertly work ing on pro jects at night andon week ends that had been or dered haltedby their di vi sion chief. He fur ther con cludedthat em ploy ees were des per ately try ing tofind old spec i mens of bi o log i cal agents,in clud ing an thrax, they could “re-la bel” tocover up spec i mens that had gone miss ingin the chaos of pro hib ited, af ter-hours labwork.

“I walked in and the lights were on, thescope was off, and they were in tenselylook ing for these blocks [of an thrax],”Lang ford de scribed. “What was in di catedto me was that per haps these spec i menswere boot leg so to speak, they were go ingto cover them with old spec i mens, andwhen the old spec i mens dis ap peared, theywere go ing to take these old an thrax blocks and sub sti tute them. Well, when those were un avail able then these new blocks [ofan thrax] mys te ri ously dis ap peared. So ofcourse the prob a bil ity is high that therewas a prob lem there.”

Lang ford also de scribed to the in ves ti -ga tor strong re sis tance from his un der lingsand other sci en tists to his ef forts to man age the group. Among those Lang ford con sid -ered man age ment prob lems were Mar ianRippy, a re searcher in the ex per i men talpa thol ogy di vi sion. (Zack and Rippy hadalso been rep ri manded by the Army forha rass ing Assaad.) Lang ford said hecon sid ered a num ber of those on his staff to be “ex tremely dif fi cult to deal with, wouldvol un teer al most noth ing, nearly al most

The First Free dom October 2010 21P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

(Con tin ued from page 18)The me dia to day re fuse to re veal that

Slaton was a mem ber of Lu ther Rosser’s

“Knights of Mary Phagan” car ries out court sen tence

Tom Wat son ral lied the peo pleof Geor gia for jus tice. His statuestands at en trance to State Capitol.

Gov. John Slaton’sact failed to save LeoFrank.

Leo Frank fi nally paidfor his hei nous crime!

law firm. On Aug. 17, 1915,some 26 prom i nent Mariettacit i zens would carry out thecourt’s sen tence. They calledthem selves “The Knights ofMary Phagan.” Seven car loadsof de ter mined men cut thetele phone lines to the Stateprison in Milledgeville. Theyseized Frank, drove the 106miles back to Marietta. Threetimes they asked Frank if hehad killed Mary and threetimes he re fused to an swer.They hanged him in Marietta,where Mary Phagan was born, raised and bur ied. The site is near the in ter sec tion of Roswell Road and High way41, (Cobb Park way), near the “Big Chicken” KFCres tau rant. Three months later, the night of No vem ber 23, 1915, Col. Wil liam Jo seph Simmons would lead a largegroup of men atop Stone Moun tain where they lit anenor mous cross and pro claimed the re launch ing of theKnights of the Ku Klux Klan which within a de cade

would rise to over three mil lion mem bers. Atthe same time, or ga nized Jewry would form theAnti-Def a ma tion League to de fend Jews such as

Leo Frank from any crit i cism!

Some 4,000 peo ple marched onSlaton’s gov er nor’s man sion. TheState mi li tia had to be called out topro tect him us ing fixed bay o nets and with barbed wire surrounding thebuild ing. The pub lic was so out raged that vi o lence against Slaton wasthreat ened and he fled Geor gia –never to re turn.

To day Jews honor Leo Frank as ahero. Nowadays Leo Frank, the childrap ist-mur derer, is hon ored by At lantaJewry. They gave his name to the “LeoFrank Chap ter of B’nai B’rith.” Theyalso have the nerve to pres ent some do-gooder with their an nual “Leo FrankAward.”

To this day four books and two films have been made claim ing that Frankwas framed and that Jim Conley wasthe real killer. How ever, the pros e cu torin the case, Hugh Dorsey, was electedgov er nor in 1916 and Tom Wat son,who wrote many ar ti cles call ing forjus tice for Mary Phagan, was elected to the U. S. Sen ate in 1920.

al ways had to be given a writ ten re quest toget a re sponse, were very de fi ant, werevery ob struc tive, and I also heard ru morsthat… Mar ian [Rippy] had made com -ments to the peo ple in that lab ba si cally toun der mine me, you know, when I wascom ing in there,” ac cord ing to Lang ford.

“We were not to con tinue any work; infact I was aware that [Pa thol ogy di vi sioncom mander Lt. Col. Nancy Jaax] hadse cured the SIV ma te ri als and peo plebe cause again it ap peared from manysources that Phil Zack was ask ing peo pleto work ba si cally co vertly and con tinue his SIV work against ob vi ous clear man datesand di rec tives of the di vi sion chief,”Lang ford told the in ves ti ga tor. (In anin ter est ing side note, Jaax, whom Lang fordre fers to, is the pro tag o nist of the Rich ardPres ton book The Hot Zone, about anEbola out break in lab mon keys in Reston,Va., in 1989. The real-life events were alsothe ba sis of the movie Out break, star ringDustin Hoffman.)

It was dur ing this pe riod, from 1990 toearly 1992, when sci en tists ap par entlypur sued pro jects co vertly at the lab, thatthe Army fa cil ity ap pears to have lost trackof 27 spec i mens, in clud ing an thrax, Ebolaand hantavirus. USAMRIID told me diathis week that any spec i mens that wentmiss ing were ren dered harm less by var i ous pres er va tion and ra di a tion pro cesses – acon ten tion Assaad says is not true. He saysthe spec i mens leave be hind a res i due thatcould be re ac ti vated.

Assaad’s per sonal ex pe ri ence at thatlab makes him par tic u larly skep ti cal. Hecom plains of be hav ior from col leaguesthat, while cer tainly not nec es sar ily that ofpo ten tial ter ror ists, does seem like symp tomsof a poorly man aged lab that was out ofcon trol.

In par tic u lar, Assaad, who is Egyp tian-Amer i can, was the tar get of the group ofUSAMRIID sci en tists and lab tech ni cianswho called them selves the Camel Club.Among his an tag o nists were col leagues inFort Detrick lab’s ex per i men tal pa thol ogydi vi sion, Zack and Rippy.

Us ing a stuffed camel as a kind ofmas cot, the Camel Club com posed a poem, “The Rhyme of the An cient Camellier,”with the ap par ent pur pose of hu mil i at ingAssaad. It be gins:

“Ayaad Assaad was the start,with a rep u ta tion for not hav ing heartA ‘skim mer’ with out equalWe hope there’s no se quelIn his honor we cre ated this beastIt rep re sents life lower than yeast…”The poem con tin ues for five type writ ten

rhym ing pages, end ing with:“Well it’s time for the camel to pass.So let’s all reach and raise up a glass.Let’s give’m the credit,the one who will get it,

the poor bas tard we’re gonna ha rass.”Assaad the o rizes that the Camel Club

and the ra cial dis crim i na tion he ex pe ri encedwere at least partly an out growth of adis pute he had with Zack and Rippy overthe au thor ship of a sci en tific pa per forwhich he says he had done the re search.Rippy and Zack, Assaad says, had doneonly mi nor work, but wanted to put theirnames on the re search pa per, and he sayshe felt they did n’t de serve it. Assaad saysthe dis pute es ca lated, with Rippy and Zackthreat en ing to be dis rup tive and hu mil i atehim at a sci en tific con fer ence where hede liv ered his pa per’s find ings. Then, hesays, their ha rass ment took an eth nic cast,be cause of his Arabic her i tage.

Assaad said he filed a for mal com plaintwith the Army af ter his su per vi sor ig noredhim. The com mander of the U. S. Army lab in ves ti gated the com plaint and found inAssaad’s fa vor, and sin gled out Zack andRippy for crit i cism for be ing at the cen terof the Camel Club. (The Army in ves ti ga tiondoc u ments fur ther re vealed that the two,both mar ried, were also hav ing an af fair.)

“Based upon your com plaint, I di rectedthat an in for mal in ves ti ga tion be con ducted,”USAMRIID’s then-com mander, Col.

Ron ald Wil liams, wrote Assaad in a memoin Au gust 1992. “The in ves ti ga tion re vealedthat Lieu ten ant Col o nel Zack and Dr.Rippy had par tic i pated in dis crim i na torybe hav ior.

“On be half of the United States ofAmer ica, the Army, and this In sti tute, I wishto gen u inely and hum bly apol o gize for this be hav ior,” Wil liams’ memo con tin ued.

Be fore the in ves ti ga tion ended, both Zackand Rippy were rep ri manded. Then Zackleft USAMRIID in De cem ber 1991, firsthead ing to the Army’s Wal ter Reed In sti tute,then go ing to the pri vate phar ma ceu ti calcom pany Eli Lilly, and then to a com panyin Col o rado ac quired by St. Louis’ NexstarFi nan cial Man age ment. Sev eral calls bySa lon to his last known phone num berand ad dress in Boul der, Col o rado, wentun re turned, and Nexstar says it no lon gerhas any re cord of Zack.

Rippy, who left USAMRIID shortlyaf ter Zack, in Feb ru ary 1992, worked for awhile at Eli Lilly, but could not be lo catedby Sa lon.

Assaad is puz zled that af ter clear ing him of the ac cu sa tion that he could be abioterrorist, the FBI showed no in ter est intalk ing with him about his days at Fort

Detrick.“The whole world wants to talk to me,

ex cept the FBI,” he said, as his law yer’sphones rang non stop this week, with me dia or ga ni za tions seek ing in ter views with him. “Some thing’s wrong here.”

But while the FBI may not be in ter estedin talk ing with Assaad fur ther, fed eralau thor i ties in creas ingly seem to be lievethat the an thrax let ters were sent by a U. S.gov ern ment sci en tist – and not by theIraqis or al-Qaida, as some hawks havecon tin ued to in sist over the past few months,while hun dreds of Is lamic and Arab-bornim mi grants have been ques tioned andde tained by the FBI and INS.

“I can tell you there are sci en tists outthere who do have mil i tary con nec tionsthat we are fo cus ing on, at least thatcon nec tion,” Kevin Don o van, FBI spe cialagent in charge of the New ark bu reau, saidat a press con fer ence Wednes day.

For his part, Assaad says, “I want peo ple to know the truth,” and wants to show theAmer i can peo ple that Arab-Amer i cans arenot the en emy. Should the FBI trace thean thrax at tacks back to his for mer lab,Assaad may have gone a long way to wardhis goal.

SAF sues to stop NC “emer gency” gun lawBear ing arms is your right. Ask

per mis sion and it be comes only apriv i lege.

saf.org

The State of North Carolina has for themo ment crushed the Sec ond Amend ment,putt ing law abid ing cit i zens in dan gerdur ing times of need. The un con sti tu tional“Emer gency Pow ers Gun law” pro hib itsin di vid u als from car ry ing fire arms andblocks the sale of guns and am mu ni tionswhen the State chooses to de clare “anemer gency.” Fire arms are our only meansof self-de fense in times of chaos, crime and the en dan ger ment of our fam i lies. So theSec ond Amend ment Foun da tion is su ingthe State of North Carolina for de stroy ingour Sec ond Amend ment rights and putt ingthe lives of our fam i lies in dan ger.

We must stop this “Emer gency Pow ersGun Law.”

Dur ing an emer gency is when cit i zensneed the Sec ond Amend ment most. Weall saw what hap pened dur ing hur ri caneKa trina. The gov ern ment con fis cated gunsfrom law abid ing Amer i cans who onlywanted to de fend their homes and lovedones. Ram pant crime and chaos erupted.In no cent peo ple were mur dered, raped andleft for dead. Crim i nals grabbed guns,looted homes and ter ror ized fam i lies.With out guns reg u lar Amer i cans were leftde fense less on the bayou. Iron i cally, ourgov ern ment as sured the res i dents of NewOr leans they would be safer with out guns.

That is like tell ing them to carry a knife to a gun fight.

The Su preme Court ruled in fa vor of thecase brought by The Sec ond Amend mentFoun da tion, Mc Don ald vs. Chi cago, andde ter mined that cit i zens have a right tobear arms and de fend them selves. In ahis toric rul ing, the court af firmed that theSec ond Amend ment could be in cor po rated into States. The Sec ond Amend ment notonly gives cit i zens the abil ity to de fendthem selves, it also pro tects Amer i cans fromover reach ing gov ern ments that think theycan ad e quately pro tect their cit i zens. Likeany other task the gov ern ment thinks it canhan dle, its out come is usually a gi gan ticfail ure. His tor i cally, the gov ern ment hasdone a di sas trous job at en sur ing the safetyof Amer i cans. You should not trust thegov ern ment to pro tect you…

That re cent vic tory in the Su preme Courtwas a hard won bat tle. Obama and his left ie loons stooped to the low est of lows us ingChi cago-style pol i tics to try and crush theSec ond Amend ment. They re sorted to fearmongering to scare cit i zens into tak ingac tion against the case. Lib er als ral liedthe me dia claim ing gun own er ship wouldre sult in na tion wide gun vi o lence. The onlything vi o lent about guns is the crim i nalsthat il le gally use them. While SAF wasable to de rail the gun con trol agenda andover turn Chi cago’s gun ban at the Su preme Court, this fight is far from over. We needto bat tle the North Carolina leg is la ture and

make sure the lib eral gun grab bers don’tsuc ceed in dis arm ing Amer ica.

If the “Emer gency Pow ers Gun Law” isnot over turned, ev ery other State will findways to cre ate their own ver sions of the“Emer gency Pow ers Gun Law.” This willan ni hi late all the hard work and grass rootsac tiv ism that we used to en sure our Sec ond Amend ment Rights are pro tected. Prettysoon the flood gates will open to over turnthat re cent Su preme Court rul ing and wewill even tu ally see an at tempted gun banna tion wide.

This “Emer gency Pow ers Gun Law” isil le gal. The Su preme Court just ruled thatthe Sec ond Amend ment must be ap pliedand up held by all States. “The Emer gencyPow ers Gun Law” does not up hold thatre cent Su preme Court rul ing; in deed it hasopenly de fied our hard earned vic tory forgun own ers across Amer ica.

“Through this North Carolina law suit,”said SAF founder and Ex ec u tive VicePres i dent Alan Gottlieb, “we in tend toprove State emer gency pow ers stat utesthat al low gov ern ment of fi cials to sus pendfun da men tal civil rights, in clud ing theright to bear arms, are un con sti tu tional andthere fore should be nul li fied. Cit i zens donot sur ren der their civil rights just be causeof a nat u ral or man-made di sas ter.”

The Sec ond Amend ment Foun da tion (www.saf.org)is America’s old est and larg est tax-ex empt re search,pub lish ing and le gal ac tion group fo cus ing on yourright to pri vately own and pos sess fire arms.

— Me dia by pass operation —

22 The First Free dom October 2010P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

— Zi on ist crowing —

Sit ting in on the Ra chel Corrietrial alarm ingly re vealed an openIs raeli pol icy of indiscriminationto ward ci vil ians.

By Nora Bar rows-Fried manaljazeera.net

Ra chel Corrie’s plight sym bol ized theruth less pol icy of Is raeli de mo li tion ofPal es tin ian homes in the so cial psy che ofmil lions of peo ple out side the West Bankand Gaza Strip.

“Dur ing war there are no ci vil ians.”That’s what “Yossi,” an Is raeli mil i tary(IDF) train ing unit leader sim ply stateddur ing a round of ques tion ing on day twoof the Ra chel Corrie tri als, held in Haifa’sDis trict Court last month. “When you write a [pro to col] man ual, that man ual is forwar,” he added.

For the hu man rights ac tiv ists andfriends and fam ily of Ra chel Corrie sit tingin the court room, this open ad mis sion of an Is raeli pol icy of indiscrimination to wardci vil ians – Pal es tin ian or for eign – cre atedan audible gasp.

Yet, put into con text, this pol icy co mesas no sur prise. The Is raeli mil i tary’s trackre cord of in sou ci ance to ward the kill ingsof Pal es tin ians, from the 1948 mas sa cre ofDeir Yassin in Je ru sa lem to the 2008-2009at tacks on Gaza that killed up wards of 1,400men, women and chil dren, has il lus tratedthat not only is this an en trenchedop er a tional frame work but rarely has itbeen chal lenged un til re cently.

Ra chel Corrie, the young Amer i canpeace ac tiv ist from Olym pia, Wash ing ton,was crushed to death by a Cat er pil lar D9-R bull dozer, as she and other mem bers ofthe non vi o lent In ter na tional Sol i dar ityMove ment at tempted to save a Pal es tin ianhome from im mi nent de mo li tion on March 16, 2003, in Rafah, Gaza Strip. Corrie hassince be come a sym bol of Pal es tin iansol i dar ity as her fam ily con tin ues to fightfor jus tice in her name.

Her par ents, Cindy and Craig Corrie,filed a civil law suit against the State ofIs rael for Ra chel’s un law ful kill ing – whatthey al lege was an in ten tional act – and this round of tes ti mo nies called by the State’sde fense team fol lows the Corries’ wit nesstes ti mo nies last March. The Corries’ law suitcharges the State with reck less ness and a

fail ure to take ap pro pri ate mea sures topro tect hu man life, ac tions that vi o lateboth Is raeli and in ter na tional laws.

Wit nesses in sisted that the bull dozerdriver could n’t see Ra chel Corrie fromhis perch. The State at tor neyscalled three wit nesses to thestand on Sunday and Mon dayto prove that the kill ing wasun in ten tional and took place inan area des ig nated as a “closedmil i tary zone.” Fall ing un derthe def i ni tion of an Act ofWar, their ar gu ment sought toab solve the sol diers of li a bil ityun der Is raeli law.

The Ra chel Corrie tri alsfo cus on one in ci dent, onemo ment, one death, one fam ily’sgrief. How ever, it’s im por tantto in clude the con text withinwhich the Is raeli mil i taryop er ated on that day in Marchof 2003 in or der to prop erly

Is rael’s wars recognize no ci vil ians

un der stand the grav ity of the trial and there ver ber a tions seven and a half years later.

Yossi, the mil i tary train ing leader,

de scribed the area where Corrie was killedas an “ac tive war zone.” The State’sde fense ar gues the same. Yet what washap pen ing in Rafah that was so im por tantto Corrie that she con fronted a 4-me ter-

high ar mored bull dozer in the first place?Ac cord ing to sta tis tics from Hu man

Rights Watch, Is rael had been ex pand ing

its so-called “buffer zone” at the south ernGaza bor der af ter the break out of thesec ond Pal es tin ian in ti fa da in late 2000.“By late 2002,” re ports HRW, “af ter thede struc tion of sev eral hun dred houses inRafah, the IDF be gan build ing an eightme ter high metal wall along the bor der.”

The area that Is rael des ig nates as itsbuffer zone has since en vel oped nearly35% of ag ri cul tural land, ac cord ing to anAu gust 2010 re port pub lished by theUnited Na tions Of fice of the Co or di na tionof Hu man i tar ian Af fairs (OCHA). OCHAsays that this pol icy has af fected 113,000Pal es tin ians in side the Gaza strip over thelast ten years as their farms, homes, andvil lages were in ten tion ally erased from themap.

Ra chel Corrie’s non vi o lent ac tion –stand ing in front of the bull dozer in di rectcon fron ta tion to this pro ject – cost her herlife.

The home Ra chel Corrie died try ing topro tect was razed, along with hun dreds ofoth ers. The Gaza Strip re mains a sealedghetto. And count less Pal es tin ian fam i lieshave not seen jus tice waged in their fa voraf ter the deaths of their loved ones.

In 2005, an ar rest war rant was is suedagainst Ma jor Gen eral Doron Almog – ase nior sol dier in charge of Is rael’s South ernCom mand – by a Brit ish court re lated tothe de struc tion of 59 homes in Rafah in

2002 un der his au thor ity. Hewas warned be fore board ing aflight to the UK that he couldbe ar rested upon ar rival, andcan celed his trip.

Re lated to the Ra chel Corriecase, Ma jor Gen eral Almoggave a di rect or der to the teamof in ter nal in ves ti ga tors to cutthe in ves ti ga tions short, thisac cord ing to Is raeli armydoc u ments ob tained by Is raelidaily Haaretz.

Which in di cates that theim pu nity of Is raeli sol diers andpol icymak ers can – and will –be chal lenged in a court of law.And when the tri als con tinuethis month, the Corries will be

back in the court room in an tic i pa tion of the truth emerg ing at last, and a long-soughtjus tice for their daugh ter.

Yachts bob in the har bor at Si mon’s Town,but be yond their masts loom more sin is tershapes – the sharp rect an gu lar out lines ofSouth Af ri can war ships.

Ja cob Zuma has al ways de nied thecor rup tion charges

Surely we can square the cir cle in an other cen tury or two?The ANC saw the deal as a short

term op por tu nity to fund it self, butcosts to the South Af ri can na tionin the long run were phe nom e nal.

By Mar tin PlautBBC News, Jo han nes burg

The har bor, down the coast from CapeTown, is home to the South Af ri can Navy,and the cor vettes an chored here are thepride of the fleet.

They are part of the mas sive $4.8 bil lion the coun try spent mod ern iz ing its mil i tarywhen United Na tions arms sanc tions werelifted at the end of apart heid.

But ever since that arms deal was signed in No vem ber 1999 it has been the sub jectof con tro versy, with al le ga tions of brib eryand cor rup tion.

At the cen ter of those ac cu sa tions wasthe man des tined to be South Af rica’s nextpres i dent – Ja cob Zuma, who was ac cusedof tak ing bribes from aFrench arms com pany,Thales.

Mr. Zuma, pres i dentof South Af r ica’sgov ern ing party, theANC, had re peat edlyde nied the al le ga tionsand said he would fightthe cor rup tion charges“with ev ery sinew inhis body.”

and that of his law yer. The sale of cor vettes was South Af rica’s

larg est ever arms deal.Mr. Zuma had been South Af rica’s

dep uty pres i dent, be forebe ing fired in 2005when his fi nan cialad viser, Schabir Shaik,was found guilty ofcor rup tion and jailedfor fif teen years incon nec tion with thearms deal.

Just af ter Mr. Zuma’se lec t ion as ANCpres i dent, the Na tionalPros e cut ing Au thor ity(NPA) charged him with cor rup tion, fraud,rack e teer ing and money laun der ing.

ANC in volve ment But it was thought that even if Mr. Zuma

did take the money, hewas one of the smallerben e fi cia ries. When the arms deal was signed,Ja cob Zuma was apro vin cial leader andnot in gov ern ment.

Mar tin Weltz, ed i torof the in ves ti ga tivemag a zine Noseweek,did not be lieve Ja cobZuma was a key player

the il le gal pay ments af ter the deal wassigned, in or der to pro tect the Frenchcom pany from scru tiny by the SouthAf ri can au thor i ties. Other peo ple al leg edly

re ceived the bulk of the es ti mated $200 mil lionpaid in bribes. Mar tinWeltz be lieved thelarg est re cip i ent wasthe ANC, which usedthe money to fi nanceits 1999 elec tioncam paign. “The Af ri canNa tional Con gress is aparty of the poor,” hesaid. “There is no waythat a party like that

could fund a mod ern elec tion re quir ingme dia ex po sure, trav el ing, etc.”

“The ANC saw the deal as a short termop por tu nity to fund it self, but the cost tothe na tion in the long term is phe nom e nal,” he said.

Ja cob ZumaThe ANC de nied this and de cided to

con duct its own in quiry into the af fair.

But Moeletsi Mbeki, Pres i dent ThaboMbeki’s brother, was scorn ful about suchan in ves ti ga tion.

“It’s a worth less ex er cise,” he said.“They think they can in tim i date theju di ciary, but they were free dom fight erstoo and won’t be in tim i dated.”

In ter na tional in ves ti ga tionsSwed ish, Brit ish and Ger man in ves ti ga -

tions also got un der way into how the armscon tracts were ne go ti ated.

“Our agen cies have been most un will ingto co op er ate with the Brit ish and Ger mans,”said Judge Willem Heath, who first lookedinto the deals, “so it’s a black mark againstour coun try – one that South Af rica willnever lose.”

If those in ves ti ga tions were suc cess ful,other South Af ri can pol i ti cians would beim pli cated.

The con se quences of the Thales af faircould rip ple across Af rica and the rest ofthe world.

A sign that the Rain bow Na tion couldyet be smeared with a stain from a murkypast.

He asked the Con sti tu tional Court toques tion the le gal ity of raids on his home

in the scan dal. He said Mr. Zuma was only in cluded in

Waterboard this school board?RALEIGH, N. C. – Ideo log i cally-based

bus ing hav ing failed its prom ises, the WakeCounty School Board has ended shut tlingstu dents be yond neigh bor hood schools inforc ing “di ver sity” upon those who pre feran ed u ca tion. The NAACP saw its lu cra tive

mis sion threat ened and quickly asked theZOG’s “Ed u ca tion Czar” to “ed u cate” thatschool board. Who needs lo cal gov ern mentwhen noth ing out ranks di ver sity? NAACPPres i dent B. T. Jeal ous wants his fleet seenagain sail ing proudly in re view.

Let ters… -Your signed let ter with phone num ber and ad dress is wel come, but will be ed ited as nec es sary to fit avail ablespace. Send to The First Free dom, P.O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576 or email firstfreedom@gulftel.com

— Bul le tin board —

Amer i can Free PressHere’s a weekly na tional news pa per withsto ries the con trolled press can’t touch.The Spot light was shut down by ZOG, butthis one came back fight ing. Send $17.76for a one time 16-week “Get Ac quainted”sub scrip tion to 645 Penn syl va nia Av e nueSE, Suite 100, Wash ing ton, DC 30003.GREGORY KAY’s The Third Rev o lu tion

se ries (fic tion – or pre dic tion? – of a ris ing free South) is avail able in three 400+page pa per back books that you can or der on line at www.geocities.com/thethirdrevolutionor from the au thor at RR2 Box 12K,Letart, WV 25253. These ti tles are $23.45each PPD in U. S. or oc cu pied C. S. A:

The Third Rev o lu tionThe Long KnivesThe Black Flag

ADVERTISE on this bul le tin board. Just$10 per in ser tion, max i mum 50 words, 10¢each ad di tional word.

ARMINIUS THE LIBERATOR by Ing ridZündel is the most de tailed book about thelife and strug gles of this young Ger manCheruskan ever com piled. Over throw inghis coun try’s Ro man oc cu pi ers, here’s the true story of an em pire tak ing its cru sadeto “make the world safe for mediacracy” abridge too far. For your 8.5 x 11, 324-pagemil len nium soft cover edi tion, send $50 toSoar ing Ea gles Stu dios and Gal lery, 2662Wears Val ley Road, Sevierville, TN 37862.

KKK – Rev. R. D. Loy, P. O. Box 4731,South Bend, In di ana 46624

Amer ica: Born July 4, 1776Died No vem ber 4, 2008

100 DVDs $1 each. Ron Paul, the Fed, our For eign Pol icy, North Amer i can Un ion,im mi gra tion, JFK, trea son, 911, fire armsown er ship, Iraq war, me dia/gov ern men talcol lab o ra tion. Ron Neil, 817-219-2798.

DISPLAY ADVERTISING for pages 6-22:

www.gulftel.com/firstfreedom/adv.rates.htm

YOUR NAME in TFF makes a dif fer ence.

THE POLITICAL CESSPOOL – “TheSouth’s fore most pop u list ra dio pro gram.”

www.thepoliticalcesspool.org

BE ON THE cut ting edge of the bat tle tolib er ate Amer ica and find out why thismonthly news pa per has thou sands of loyal read ers. Sub scribe to day by send ing $19.00for one year, or $37.00 for two years toThe Na tion al ist Times, 10161 Park RunDrive, Suite 150, Las Ve gas, NV 89145.

JOIN GIDEON’S ELITE, PREPAREFOR KINGDOM SERVICE! HearPas tor Pe ter J. Pe ters daily on WWCRshortwave ra dio. For a FREE news let terwith com plete broad cast sched ule: Scrip -tures For Amer ica,. POB 766, LaPorte CO80535. 24 hrs daily internet stream ing @www.scripturesforamerica.org

REALITY CHECK – 217 pgs pa per back.You are a his tory sleuth right along sideGer man-born au thor Chris tine Miller asshe plays Zi on ist con tra dic tions in theirown words against them selves. Noth ing iscloser to fresh air and light than Re al ityCheck. $20 PPD in the U.S., $24 for eign.TFF, P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, AL 36576.

Judeo-Chris tian = False ChurchTrue Chris tian not Jew-Chris tian

www.DEBUNKINGtfc.infoDe bunk ing the False Church

To join the Sons of Con fed er ate Vet er ans, call SCV Head quar ters at

1-800-MY-SOUTH

FACTS ARE FACTS is a book con tain ingcon clu sive ev i dence that his tory and otherme dia have lied for more than a hun dredyears. For your copy send $11.95 to PatRe vere, P.O. Box 1947, Payson, AZ 85547

Please save us post age by watch ing yoursub scrip tion’s ex pi ra tion on ad dress la bel.

BOOKS & LITERATURE plus “WhiteVoice” news let ter. Send $5 m. o. for a list.

Ra cial Na tion al ist Party of Amer icaP. O. Box 1281, Lockport, NY 14095

BACK ISSUES of The First Free domavail able at $3 each PPD in C.S.A. or U.S:#510 The Ten Com mand ments rally#708 Who rules Amer ica?#711 Be gins se ries by “Cat Man” Jo seph

Rorie on “14th Amend ment,” thru to#805; the en tire set of which is yoursfor $20 PPD.

ORDER A COPY OF EVERY ISSUE,138 in all in clud ing this one, for $138.Send check or m.o. to The First Free dom,P.O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576.

EUROPEAN AMERICAN HERITAGEFes ti val, this year on Oc to ber 23, 2010, isheld an nu ally in Pulaski, Ten nes see, just70 miles south of Nash ville. Booths areavail able; call 870-427-3414. Join us in an open dis play of your Eu ro pean her i tage.Carry your na tional home land’s flag.

EUSTACE MULLINS books in hard back, your choice at $16 each PPD in CSA.

· Se crets of the Fed eral Re serve, 206 pp· Mur der by In jec tion, 372 pp

The First Free domP. O. Box 385

Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

KENTUCKY BLOODLETTING car riesyou on a tour of the kill ing fields acrossthat State to where in no cent Con fed er atePOWs were sim ply hauled from their cells and marched be fore Yan kee fir ing squads,four “re bels” mur dered in cold blood foreach in vader killed by the an gry cit i zenry.It’s a 2-1/2 hour DVD, yours PPD any where in U. S. or C. S. A. for $15. Or der di rectlyfrom nar ra tor/cin e ma tog ra pher and rov ing re porter Nancy Hitt, 6214 Apex Drive,Lou is ville, KY 40219.

SOUTHERN SOLUTION. Yes, Amer icais in Cri sis. Yes – there is a so lu tion. Thisdoc u men tary is ex pected to be com pletedand re leased dur ing the sum mer. We havein cluded a brief in tro duc tion on line athttp://southernnationalcongress.org/video1.shtml and hope you will take afew min utes to watch it.

The First Free dom October 2010 23P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

BASH THE JINGOIt’s sug gested that a First Free dom

pro fes sional jour nal ist pub lish a “crys talclear” brief ar ti cle that ex plains how andwhy “the Jew” has gained CONTROL ofour me dia/gov ern ment. A mem o ra blear ti cle of truth. The Jew con trol is toofor mi da ble!

Al though Jew ish cit i zens are on all sides of all is sues, to avoid a con spir acy charge,they NEVER pub licly ex pose and con demn the Jew con trol of our me dia/gov ern ment.

F. J. “DINTY” MOORECocolalla, ID

As a reg u lar reader, you know we dothat all the time; and again on page 14.

DEES ILLUSTRATIONNice job that Sep tem ber is sue. In the

Gordon Duff ar ti cle on page 10, it lookslike Henry Kissinger wear ing the se cu rityguard’s uni form. THOMAS ANTHONY

Tequesta, FLDr. K herds lit tle girls thru a scan ner

with the skill that checked ter ror ists into con trol of Rho de sia and South Af rica.

ANCHORED THINKINGA re cent Pew His panic Cen ter re port

says four mil lion chil dren in the UnitedStates born of il le gal alien par ents weregranted cit i zen ship. This rep re sents fiveper cent of all chil dren in the U. S. youn gerthan 18 in 2009, in creasing to eight per cent be cause the pre vi ous year an es ti mated340,000 of the 4.3 mil lion new ba bies were born to il le gal aliens, the report says.

One of two main rea sons il le gal alienscome to the U. S. is for the women to givebirth, “an chor ba bies” getting full ben e fitsas Amer i can cit i zens, so that the par entscan even tu ally be come citizens.

The 14th Amend ment was added af terthe war of North ern Ag gres sion (so-calledCivil War) to pre vent States from de ny ingcit i zen ship rights to newly-freed slaves. Itad mits il le gal aliens have no rights – thatchil dren born of for eign par ents not sub ject to the ju ris dic tion of the United States arenot cit i zens.

So the draft ers ac tu ally con sid ered theamend ment’s ef fect on alien chil dren. Theau thor of the cit i zen ship clause, Sen a torJa cob Howard of Mich i gan, said, “Thiswill not, of course, in clude per sons born inthe United States who are for eign ers,aliens, who be long in the fam i lies ofam bas sa dors or for eign min is ters.”

Then, in 1982, Jus tice Brennan slipped a foot note into a Su preme Court opin ion forthe case “an chor ba bies,” which Amer icais gov erned by. RAY DIVELY

Baden, PA

FLYERSIf you printed pages 3 and 4, “Jew ish

in flu ence in the U. S. Gov ern ment” plusPaul Craig Rob erts’ “With out a rev o lu tion,Amer i cans are his tory” [TFF, Sep tem ber2010], that would come across as a greatmes sage left on cars in church park ing lots, or on bul le tin boards, or, or, or…

MARY ANN MURPHYBuf falo, MO

Just cut and paste that flyer to getheryour self, in clud ing a sub scrip tion form,and take it to a copy shop. Send us one.

CHARADEI agree with most, but not all, who write

to and for The First Free dom. My mi norcom plaint goes against those who fail toclar ify what the word Jew ac tu ally means.We must com pre hend that, ge net i cally, heis ei ther a Judean or of He brew ex trac tion,and fewer than 10% of to day’s Is rael-liesqual ify. Rev. 2:9 and 3:9 in di cates thoseother 90% are all im post ers.

ERNEST FOUSTMag a zine, AR

TOO TOLERANTI’ve been very dis ap pointed in many of

the other “pa tri otic/na tion al ist” pub li ca tionsbe cause they fail to iden tify cor rectly thesub ver sive groups and or ga ni za tions thatare be hind so much of the evil de lug ing our coun try and world. The Zi on ists, Ma sonsand mega-wealthy Jew ish bank sters of tenes cape blame. ANDREW REAGAN

Har ris burg, PA

SHOE FITSIn the July edi tion of The First Free dom

you ex press the worry that some may findyour treat ment of the Is raeli at tack upon theGaza aid flo tilla ex ces sive. Don’t worry, itis n’t. What’s ex ces sive is the de gree towhich Zi on ism af fects America.

Zi on ism is the root cause of the at tackon 9/11.

Zi on ism was the driv ing force be hindour mil i tary at tack upon Iraq – a $3 tril lionuse less slaugh ter of over 100,000 Iraqis.

Jew ish greed and pro cliv ity to lie andcheat has de stroyed our na tional wealth bythe ex por ta tion of our man u fac tur ing baseto earn tem po rary bo nuses.

Jew ish nep o tism and shame less self-pro mo tion have moved un tal ented Jews intoour na tion’s high est lead er ship po si tions,where they scheme to el e vate even lesstal ented Jews into sim i lar high places. That dwarf ish Elena Kagan, with out ju di cialex pe ri ence, is a prime ex am ple of thispro cess.

Con gress has been bought, cas tratedand lobotomized by AIPAC.

Jews have gained con trol of our me diaand cor rupted our news sources into or gansof Is raeli pro pa ganda.

So, I don't find your fo cus un war ranted.I think it is ap pro pri ate.

RICHARD VAJSUp per Tract, WV

TEA TIMERe pub li cans have con trol of the Tea

Par ties for the mo ment. I hope to “makewaves” there where the av er age Joe andJane of the an gry pub lic at tend. I plan tobe gin at tend ing such meets here in myState and will be pack ing. It’s the printedtext that’s also avail able on PDF disks foremailing to oth ers rel a tive to the out cry ofthis move ment – pre sent ing the foun da tionfor why things are as they are. We’ve gotfol low-up “starter” level kits pro vided forthe se ri ous minded, giv ing them con tactwith the Ar ti cle V Group. I’m send ing outmore of these daily. BILL IVY

Johns Is land, SCYour seven-page “14th Amend ment”

pam phlet is neat! We’ll do it next month.

DETRACTIONI’m glad Chris DeHuff put the busi ness

down in his re but tal de fend ing Na tionalSo cial ism. How ever, those watch ing theJewsnews are still be fud dled by what Rev.Terry Jones wanted to do with his “Burn aKo ran” Day. While he backed off, no ticethe at ten tion he got. Prob lem is, the Zi on ist grip on the JuSA is so pow er ful that his actturned all eyes away from their atroc i ties –and put full cen sure on the Arabs! Av er ageWhite Amer i cans are com pletely un awarethat a band of Jew ish par a sites keep themhat ing in no cent “en e mies” who, like they,also re main vic tim ized by the oc cu pa tionJews In Charge.

I say we raise aware ness about the Jewsmore than here to fore. Terry Jones may bebrain-pol luted with Jew-deo Chris tian itybut he made a stink. So let’s burn a To rah,Tal mud and Mish nah on the an ni ver sary of Is rael’s 1967 at tack upon the USS Lib erty.And, when the bleed ing hearts com plain,cry and ask why, tell them who their realen emy is – this He brew tribe of Asiatics –and do not back down. Our ra cial holy warmust per pet u ally at tack Zi on ism. It’s notabout hate, but what you love: your race.

REV. JEFF LODORCorcoran, CA

The mediacracy would ei ther ig norethat June 8, 2011, Burn a Tal mud Dayout of ex is tence or get ZOG’s flun kies topass de crees re nam ing it “Ho lo caust II.” But go ahead, folks, be gin stock ing up.

IMPORTANTI es pe cially en joyed the July 2009 is sue

with its five pages de voted to theMossad-+ as sisted U. S. gov ern ment job of 9/11, and hope you will con sider keep ingthis mat ter on the front burner. No U. S.prob lem is more im por tant. our mem ber -ship in cludes four cur rent or emer i tus pro -fes sors at U. C. Da vis. E. H. (HANK)JOERGER

Co-Chair, Da vis for 9/11 TruthDa vis, CA

1,308 ar chi tec tural and en gi neer ingpro fes sion als and 9,761 oth ers in clud ing A&E stu dents have signed the pe ti tionde mand ing of Con gress an in de pend ent9/11 in ves ti ga tion. Any one can sign it at

Jack Kershaw, 1913-2010Jack was an art ist, sculp tor, homebuilder,

farmer, law yer, lec turer, South ern his to rian and Vanderbilt grad u ate in the early 1930s.A re nais sance man, nonconforming in both dress and con tent, he was one of thoseun for get ta ble char ac ters por trayed in theReader’s Di gest ar ti cles.

Jack was a co-founder of the League ofthe South, one of its orig i nal board mem bers,and also founded the Mary Noel KershawFoun da tion to help fund var i ous League ofthe South ed u ca tional ef forts. He faith fully at tended lo cal chap ter meet ings un til hishealth be gan to limit his ac tiv ity.

Jack was a mem ber of the Sons ofCon fed er ate Vet er ans Joe Johnston Camp28, along with M.O.S.B. – the SCV of fi cercorps. He was an heir of Con fed er ateStates of Amer ica Admiral Kershaw, ofSouth Carolina.

Jack fought the good fight, and willal ways be re mem bered.

– The Ten nes sean

FREE SAMPLE?I saw your ad in the Idaho Ob server and

was re ferred to you by oth ers. Can youplease send me some old sam ple pa pers soI can see what your news pa per looks like?Also, do you have any first-time sub scriber deals for prison in mates, and how of tendoes your pa per come out?

STEPHEN MARTINSoledad, CA

Due to the tight bud get on which thisnon profit news pa per op er ates, we can’tsend free sam ple cop ies to inmates. Butfive 44¢ stamps will get any pris oner asin gle copy, and read ers in the “free”sec tor are sub scrib ing some of them.

War riors of HonorThis doc u men tary placesthe Civil War in i tshis tor i cal and cul turalcon text. It guides theviewer through thecauses and ma jor bat tlesof the Civil War whilepro vid ing in sight intothe lives of Rob ert E. Lee and Stone wall Jack son.

· 1 DVD . . . . . . $20.00 + 4.00 S&H = $24.00· 3 or more . . . $15.00 each + 5.00 to tal S&H· 6 or more . . . $12.00 each, and FREE SHIPPING

Send check or money or der to:

New Lib erty Vid eosP. O. Box 25662Shaw nee Mis sion, KS 66225

Email in quires: NLVideos@everestkc.net

— self-gov ern ment be gins at home —

The First Free domP.O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

________________________________________FULL NAME

________________________________________MAIL ADDRESS

________________________________________CITY STATE ZIP

________________________________________REMARKS

ð Here’s $25 for a one-year sub scrip tionð $35 for same, but in 1st class envelopeð $30 for 100 ex tra cop ies of cur rent is sueð $25 for 100 back is sues; pre fer_______ð $15 for 22 ex tra cop ies of cur rent is sueð $10 for 10 ex tra cop ies of cur rent is sueð $_________as a pa tron. Keep it go ing!

his de signs, chronic mis chief, de lu sionsand an cient fix a tion on rul ing the world. “Change” in deed isin the air, al thoughnot ex actly the kind he was look ing for.That out dated curse of Jew ish-fi nancedand in sti gated wars

A child’s gar den of in doc tri nated versesBy Olaf Childressfirstfreedom@gulftel.com

Our en emy co mes at us to day with ev ery gam bit he can think of that would post pone the in ev i ta ble time of a great awak en ing to

24 The First Free dom October 2010P. O. Box 385, Silverhill, Al a bama 36576

must now – as Gen tiles re cover the me dia – pain fully ob serve its care fully-con structedap pa rat chik “di ver sity” fall ing be fore thetruth’s lat est mobilization. With no thanksfrom the Jew, this newly-dis cov ered or derwill res cue both camps from his folly.

Yes, to day we stum ble upon our goldenop por tu nity – a com mu ni ca tions mir a cle!Where did it come from? Was the internetal ways there, wait ing for us to notice?

Look ing back through his tory’s pageswe see noth ing out of place. Con ser va tivesde mand the new con cept dem on strate itsown cre den tials – not just “fa cil i tate” some crazy scheme that would first de stroy andthen take over the foun da tions laid by what has al ready stood such tests. But lib er alscan’t wait to get on with their “prog ress”;they reckon this at ti tude un imag i na tive,and, by pro ject ing art less the ory above that cor ner stone, would “lib er ate” us from ourrev er ence for na ture’s First Mover. Showme one such hy poth e sis having weath eredthe rav ages of time, any elit ist’s com mu nist par a dise re al ized, and I’ll lis ten fur ther.

If you have noth ing to say, don’t say it.How ever, the enemy’s weap ons of mass

in struc tion do lob false ideas into the heads of in no cents by rep e ti tion. We must regainsuf fi cient pres ence on that fo rum to thwartthe clever snake oil salesman’s agenda forun de fined “change,” and announce cer tainSo cratic rem e dies of our own.

His cam paign is nei ther new nor aboutto run out of fi nances or Gen tile stooges. In the fifth grade I ac cepted as fact ev ery thing my brain washed teacher said con cern ingthe then-rag ing Sec ond World War. AdolfHit ler, as the world wide-Jew ish-con trolled mediacracy put it, was firmly in con trol ofthe me dia and had de signs on us chil dren.The blood let ting and par al lel pro pa gandahav ing at length stretched into five years –al most half a young life time – in the sixthgrade I posed to those who would lis ten my idea of a speedy solution: “If Ger many isjust one coun try and the rest of the worldwants peace, why send only enough GIs tohold them back, in stead of us all pick ing up our hunt ing ri fles, climb ing into any tub orrow boat that’ll float, cross ing the At lan ticand fin ish ing this war?”

That’s how our “peace pro cess” did it on the play ground. Following any fist fight, acir cle of on look ers would make the pair ofcombatants shake hands. So why could n’tgrown ups learn a thing or two from us?

Those de mons inciting most such wars(and the naïve mis con cep tions about them) were n’t miss ing a beat. My sev enth-gradeciv ics text book con tained a four-cap tioncar toon that car i ca tured Hit ler in struct ing a

class of boys. In the first panel, stand ingwith raised arm, he yells, “Heil! The worldis square” – one of his seated wards not ingaside: “That’s ab surd!”

Next, we see the boys look ing at eachother while their Führer re peats his theme,“Heil! The world is square.” Among thoseclass mates, a whis per: “It’s an in ter est ingthe ory.”

Third panel, same “Heil! The world issquare.” Ob serves one of the lads: “Youknow, there may be some thing to that.”

And, lastly, “Heil! The world is square”finds the en tire class standing at at ten tionand boom ing out, with raised arm salutes:“Heil! The world is square!”

My young self thought that comic bookskit silly and out of place in a pub lic schooltext. Only years af ter ward would a morema ture mind re al ize the ef fec tive ness ofsuch pro pa ganda. We stand dumb foundedbe fore the phe nom e non of a friend or loved one re fus ing to even be lieve it pos si ble that these om ni pres ent, sat u rat ing me dia couldlie about 9/11, and in volve them selves bycov er ing up for the true cul prits. Ac cus ingneigh bor ing States of its own crime, Is raeltar get ing them for an nex ation? Many stand de fi antly against any con sid er ation of thatthought. Abun dant ev i dence in plain sight? “The rantings of a few old con spir acy nuts. Look, it’s it all on tape; the Mus lims rightnow plan ning a mosque on its foun da tionsbrought down those WTC twin tow ers endof dis cus sion.”

But – what about Build ing 7, the one noplane hit?

“Build ing what? Hey, all of the smallstruc tures in that area came down. The bigones fell on them.”

Is the name Silverstein men tioned onany of your tapes?

“Who?”Six months be fore 9/11, the Silverstein

Group picked up that whole com plex for$3.2 bil lion, “a dream come true,” as LarrySilverstein re marked at the time.

Build ing Seven stood well apart fromthe col laps ing Twin Tow ers, but con trol lerof the WTC com plex Larry Silverstein hadit brought down on com mand. Over heard,and his voice re corded, he fi nally ad mit tedin a PBS doc u men tary that he “and theFDNY de cided jointly to de mol ish WTC 7late in the af ter noon of 9/11.” Any build ing not owned by Silverstein Prop er ties, eventhose a lot closer to the Twin Tow ers thatcol lapsed onto them, re mained strangelyup right. Silverstein has made a kill ing offin sur ance, and is still su ing to col lect fromad di tional in ter na tional in sur ers brought in just be fore 9/11. Then we have the mys tery of those “put” op tions right be fore 9/11 onthe Chi cago Ex change.

“More rantings by a few old con spir acynuts who know noth ing about mar kets!”

But they’ve pub lished that in sti tu tion’sown doc u ments. Be tween Sep tem ber 6 and 7, the Chi cago Board Op tions Ex changesaw pur chases of 4,744 “put” op tions onUnited Air lines, but only 396 call op tions.As sum ing peo ple with ad vance knowl edge of the im mi nent at tacks bought 4,000 suchop tions, those “in sid ers” would prof it byal most $5 mil lion.

And on Sep tem ber 10, the ex change had 4,516 “put” op tions for Amer i can Air linesbut only 748 calls. Again, no news at thatpoint jus tified such an im bal ance. As sum ethat 4,000 of those op tions trades rep re sent “in sid ers” – they would gain $4 mil lion.

Oc to ber se ries op tions for UAL sold inhighly un usual vol umes three trad ing daysbe fore the ter ror ist at tacks for a to tal out lay of $2,070. In ves tors bought those op tioncon tracts, each rep re sent ing 100 shares, at90 cents each. The op tions later sold forover $12 each. The Op tions Clear ing houseCor po ra tion notes 2,313 of the so-called“put” op tions re main out stand ing.

Who were those prof i teers that must’vehad fore know ledge? Sorry, that’s FBI topse cret stuff even to day. Na tional se cu rity,you see. Osama Bin Laden and com pany

are still out there try ing to kill all of us.“Heil! The world is square!” Tell a big

lie of ten enough – as Hit ler and Goeb belsdid, ac cord ing to the Jew ish mediacracy –and peo ple will be lieve it.

Ing rid A. Rimland did n’t have the me dia out reach back on April 26, 1997; but, since then, her hus band hav ing spent seven years in nu mer ous pris ons for in ves ti gat ing andre port ing his find ings about the so-calledHo lo caust, no crime at all, her Zundelsite is to day among the world’s most con sultedtruth fo rums, and the big lies be gin fad ingfaster. On that date she ex plained what weslow think ers would in time acknowledge:

“Ev ery body has heard about the ‘big-lie’pro pa ganda tech nique. In typ i cal lap dogfash ion, Amer i can news pa pers of ten re ferto it as ‘Hit ler’s big-lie tech nique.’

“The idea is that the more bra zen andar ro gant a liar is – and the big ger his lie –the less likely he is to get caught.

“We’ve been told over and over againthat this was a fa vor ite ‘Nazi’ pro pa gandatrick, prac ticed with di a bol i cal per fec tionby Josef Goeb bels, and that Adolf Hit lerwas the one who was pri mar ily re spon si ble for it.

“Ap ply this idea to the Ho lo caust story – and the ones who ben e fit from it.

“For in stance, the most prom i nent and‘re spect able’ Jew ish pro pa ganda or ga ni za -tion in Amer ica, the Anti-Def a ma tionLeague of B’nai B’rith, has pub lished apam phlet on Na tional So cial ism, TheAnat omy of Na zism, a por tion of whichstates:

Of course part of the Nazi pro pa -ganda tech nique was sim ply the art of fab ri ca tion. Hit ler wrote: “A def i nitefac tor in get ting a lie be lieved is thesize of the lie. The broad mass of thepeo ple, in the sim plic ity of theirhearts, more eas ily fall vic tim to a big lie than to a lit tle lie.”“You can get a copy of this ADL

pam phlet your self by send ing fifty centsto the ADL of fice in New York, and then Iurge you to go to the li brary or to buyyour self a copy of Mein Kampf and checkit out for your self what Adolf Hit lerac tu ally wrote about the ‘Big-lie tech nique.’The quote in the ADL pam phlet is a quotede lib er ately taken out of con text and twisted.

“Speak ing of Ludendorff, the re veredmil i tary leader of Ger many in WWI whowas blamed via Al lied pro pa ganda forGer many’s los ing WWI, Hit ler wrote:

It re quired the whole bot tom lessfalse hood of the Jews and theirMarx ist fight ing or ga ni za tion to laythe blame for the col lapse on that veryman who alone, with su per hu manen ergy and will power, tried to pre ventthe ca tas tro phe he fore saw and savethe na tion from its time of deep esthu mil i a tion and dis grace.

By brand ing Ludendorff as guiltyfor the loss of (WW I), they took theweapon of moral right from the onedan ger ous ac cuser who could haverisen against the trai tors to thefa ther land.

In this they pro ceeded on thesound prin ci ple that the mag ni tude ofa lie al ways con tains a cer tain fac torof cred i bil ity, since the great massesof the peo ple in the very bot tom oftheir hearts tend to be cor rupted ratherthan con sciously and pur posely evil,and that, there fore, in view of theprim i tive sim plic ity of their minds,they more eas ily fall a vic tim to a biglie than to a lit tle one, since theythem selves lie in lit tle things, butwould be ashamed of lies that weretoo big.

Such a false hood will never en tertheir heads, and they will not be ableto be lieve in the pos si bil ity of suchmon strous ef fron tery and in fa mousrep re sen ta tion in oth ers; yes, evenwhen en light ened on the sub ject,they will long doubt and wa ver, and

con tinue to ac cept at least one ofthese causes as true . . . (t)herefore,some thing of even the most in so lentlie will al ways re main and stick – afact which all the great lie-vir tu osiand ly ing clubs in this world knowonly too well and also make the mosttreach er ous use of.

The fore most con nois seurs of thistruth re gard ing the pos si bil ity in theuse of false hood and slan der haveal ways been the Jews; for, af ter all,their whole ex is tence is based on onesin gle great lie, to wit, that they are are li gious com mu nity while ac tu allythey are a race – and what a race!

“Please keep in mind that this was writ tenin 1924-1925, while Hit ler, then still a youngman in his mid-thir ties, was in prison inLandsberg. He was to ma ture and evolvehis think ing over the next two de cades, and at the end of his life he re ferred to Jews notas an an thro po log i cally de fin able race but,in stead, as a ‘race of the mind.’ ”

Those who do not ac cept ev ery story astrue be cause both the “main stream” me diaand “cur rent wis dom” agree on it – i.e., anOlaf Childress, Adolf Hit ler, Ernst Zündel,or maybe even your self, “con spir acy nuts”ask ing who ben e fits from what ever ac tionsthe news log i cally sug gests must fol low –need a coun ter-ex pla na tion. For, what if anof fi cial mes sen ger call ing all 9/11 Truthers rad i cals is, in fact, him self the epit ome ofrad i cal ism and sub ver sion? Stay with me.

As none of us would vol un teer to sit on a jury that may hear only one side’s case forcon vic tion or ac quit tal of a mur der sus pect, why con tinue loung ing be fore a tele visedprejudice fa voring “di ver sity” rather thanthe truth, a J.I.C. saving you the trou ble offorming your own opin ion?

Hav ing presented the proofs re peat edlyabout who exerts near-com plete con trol ofthe me dia, I can’t dis agree with Hit ler’s“…ac tu ally they are a race – and what arace!” Yes, one that’s de ter mined to ei therkill or rule over each of us.

Are we too guile less to catch how theyim ple ment that pro gram? Ask ing not whoben e fits from 9/11, but what one can do forhis coun try against those de vout Mus limsstand ing as Zi on ism’s only real road block,Amer i cans soon learned to call the cur rentwis dom’s en e mies “towelheads,” laugh attheir “72 prom ised vir gins” and ap plaudGen er a lis simo Bush’s War on Weap ons ofMass De struc tion. Bris tling with our ownWMDs and loosing them from safe heights – at first a vir tual shoot ing gal lery – easedit for the mop ping-up grunts, those Mossad teams last in grab bing Iraq’s mu seum arttrea sures and the Dis trict of Cor rup tion’slu cra tive Re con struc tion con tracts.

As this lat est Rothschild war dragged on beyond its usual five years, how to keep usfaithfully bomb ing Is lam’s few holdouts?Put one in the White House? Im pos si ble,Amer i cans aren’t that dumb! Per haps not,but, as the mediacracy still has them eat ingJim Crow, plus eter nally vot ing the outs inand the ins out, why not a pseudo-Mus lim,as a Ne gro whose fake ide ol ogy gets outedonly af ter the “elec tion”?

If they could pull that one off, what amediacracy – and what a race! Laugh ing atour gull ibil ity, taunt ing us with “Pres i dent” Stepin Fetchit’s an tics and the profligaciesof his wife, those bankrollers of tal entedMus lim im per son ators even threat en ing aGround Zero Mosque, we would surelyflock to the polls and vote their outs againin: a lose-lose prop o si tion for civ i li za tion.

Di rect ing our cul ti vated an ger and hateagainst those who wished us no harm backwhen Jewish money fi nanced the take overof Pal es tine while sup port ing Is rael’s warsthese many in ter ven ing years brings nowIs lam’s en mity in re turn. If you’ve shutyour TV off or put away that daily pa per,pe ruse again carefully its mes sage: “Is lamintends to con quer the world! Is rael, ourally, the Mid east’s only de moc racy…

“Heil! The world is square!”