ITILV3MindMap

1

description

ITILV3MindMap

Transcript of ITILV3MindMap

  • [email protected]

    ITIL is a t radem ark o f OGC PM BoK is a t radem ark of PM I

    COBIT is t radem ark o f IS ACA & ITGI

    COBIT 4.1

    M on itor an d Evalu at e

    ME4 Provide IT Governa nce

    ME3 Ensure Compliance With Exte rnal Requ iremen ts

    ME2 M onitor and Evalua te Inte rnal Con trol

    ME1 M onitor and Evaluat e IT Pe rform ance

    De liver an d Su pp or t

    DS13 Mana ge Op eration s

    DS12 Mana ge th e Physical Environme nt

    DS11 Manag e Data

    DS10 Mana ge Proble ms

    DS9 Mana ge th e Conf ig uration

    DS8 Manag e Service Desk and In cid ents

    DS7 Educat e and Tr ain Users

    DS6 Id entify an d Alloca te Costs

    DS5 Ensur e Syst ems Security

    DS4 En su re Co ntinuous Se rvice

    DS3 M anage Perfor mance and Ca pacity

    DS2 Manag e T hird-p arty Ser vice s

    DS1 De fine an d Ma nage Ser vice Levels

    Plan an d Or ga niz e

    PO10 Man age Pro je cts

    PO9 Assess a nd Ma nage I T Risks

    PO8 Man age Q uality

    PO7 Mana ge IT Human Resources

    PO6 Co mmunicat e Man ageme nt Aims and Dir ection

    PO5 Mana ge the IT Investmen t

    PO4 Define the IT Pro cesses, Or ganisation and Relationships

    PO3 Deter mine Techn ological Dire ctio n

    PO2 Define the Inform ation Arch it ecture

    PO1 Define a St rategic IT Plan

    Ac quir e a nd Im p lem en t

    AI 7 Install a nd Accredit Solut io ns and Change s

    AI 6 Man age Cha nges

    AI 5 Procure IT Resources

    AI4 Enable Opera tio n and Use

    AI3 Acquire and Main tain T echnology Infr astructur e

    AI2 Acquire and Maintain App lication Software

    AI1 Ide ntify Automat ed Solutions

    PMBoK Edition 4

    Process Groups

    ClosingC los e Proc urem ent

    Clos e Pro ject o f Phase

    Monitoring & Control

    Administer Procurement

    M oni tor and C ontro l R isk

    Report Perform ance

    Perform Q ual i ty Contro l

    Control Cost

    Control Schedule

    Control Scope

    Verify Scope

    Perform Integrated Change Contro l

    M oni tor and Contro l Pro ject W or k

    Executing

    Conduct Procurem ent

    M anage Stak eholders E xpec tations

    Distribute Information

    M anage P ro jec t Team

    D evelop Pro ject Team

    Ac qui re Pro ject Team

    Perform Q uali ty As s uranc e

    Direc t and Manage Pro ject E xec ution

    Planning

    Plan Pr oc urem ent

    Plan R is k Res pons es

    Perform Q uantita tive Ris k Analy s is

    Perfor m Qual i tativ e Ris k Analys is

    Identify Risk

    Plan Risk Managem ent

    Plan C om m unic ations

    Develop H um an Res ources Plan

    Plan Q uali ty

    Determine Budget

    Estimate Cost

    Develop Schedule

    Estim ate ac tiv i ties Duration

    Estim ate A ctiv ities R esourc es

    Sequence Ac tiv i ties

    D efine Ac tivi ties

    Create WBS

    Define Scope

    C ol lec t R equi rem ents

    Develop Pr ojec t M anagem ent Plan

    InitiatingIdenti fy Stakeholders

    Dev elop Pro jec t C harter

    Knowledge Areas

    Procurement

    C los e Proc urem ent

    Administer Procurement

    Conduct P rocurem ent

    Plan Proc urem ent

    Risk

    M oni tor and Contro l Ris k

    P lan R is k Res pons es

    Perform Q uantita tive Ris k Analy s is

    P erfor m Qual i ta tiv e Ris k Analys is

    Identify Risk

    Plan R isk Management

    Communications

    R epor t Performanc e

    M anage S tak eholders Expec tations

    Distribute Information

    P lan C om m unic ations

    Identify Stakeholder s

    Hum an Re so urces

    Manage Pro jec t Team

    Dev elop Pro jec t Team

    Ac quire Pro jec t Team

    Dev elop Hum an R esourc es Plan

    Quality Perform Q uali ty Contro l

    Perform Q ual i ty As s ur anc e

    Plan Q ual i ty

    Cost Control Cost

    Determine Budget

    Estimate Cost

    Time

    Control Schedule

    Develop Schedule

    E stim ate ac tiv i ties Duration

    E stim ate A ctiv ities R esourc es

    Sequence Ac tiv i ties

    D efine Ac tivi ties

    Scope

    Control Scope

    Verify Scope

    Create WBS

    Define Scope

    Col lec t Requirem ents

    Integration

    Close Pro ject of Phase

    Perform Integrated Change Contro l

    M onitor and Contro l Pro ject Work

    Direc t and M anage Pro ject E xec ution

    Dev elop Pro ject Management P lan

    Dev elop P ro jec t C harter

    ISO20000:2005

    ResolutionProb le m M anagem ent

    Incident Mana gement

    RelationshipBusine ss Relationsh ip Ma nageme nt

    Supp lier M anagem ent

    Release Re le ase Manage ment

    ControlConfiguration Management

    Change M anage ment

    Service Delivery

    Budge ting and Accounting for IT Services

    Service Reportin g

    Infor mation Security M anage ment

    Ser vice Continu it y and Ava ilab ility Manag ement

    Capacity Mana gement

    Service L evel Ma nagem ent

    Consultancy

    Mentoring

    Facilitation

    I TSM Au dit an d A ssessme nt

    CMMI

    OGC IT IL V2

    ISO20000

    Rapid ITSMTurn-key IT SM Process Docum entation

    Training

    COBIT

    IS O 270 00

    IS O 200 00

    Le ad Aud it or

    Professional/Implementor

    Foundation

    I TIL Ve rsi on 2

    Service Manager

    Practitioner

    IPPI

    IPAD

    IPSR

    IPRC

    Foundation2 D ay

    I TIL Ve rsi on 3

    Advanced: TBD

    Manager BridgeM anager' s Bridge 5 DayManag in g th e LifecycleMALC 5 Day

    Lifecycle Stream

    C ontinuous Serv ice Im provem ent

    Serv ice Operation

    Serv ic e Trans i tion

    Service Design

    Service Strategy

    Capability Stream

    O SA: Operational S upport and A naly sis

    R CV : Release, Contro l and Val idation

    SO A: S er vic e O fferings and Agreem ents

    P PO: Planning, Protec tion and O ptim ization

    Foundation BridgeFoundation C BT - Sel f Pac ed

    Foundation 1 Day

    FoundationFoundation CBT

    Foundation 3 Day

    Courseware

    COBIT

    ISO 2 70 00

    ISO 2 00 00

    Le ad Aud ito r

    Professional/Implementor

    Foundation

    IT IL Ve rsi on 2

    Service Manager

    Practitioner

    IPPI

    IPAD

    IPSR

    IPRC

    Foundation2 Day

    IT IL Ve rsi on 3

    Advanced: TBD

    Manager BridgeM anager' s Bridge 5 D ay

    Managing the LifecycleMALC 5 Day

    Lifecycle Stream

    C ontinuous Serv ice Im pr ov em ent

    Serv ic e O peration

    Servic e Tr ans i tion

    Service Design

    Service Strategy

    Capability Stream

    O SA: O perational Support and A naly sis

    R CV: Release, Contro l and Val idation

    SO A: Serv ic e Offerings and Agreements

    PP O: Planning, Protection and O ptim ization

    Foundation BridgeFoundation CB T - Sel f Pac ed

    Foundation 1 Day

    FoundationFoundation CBT

    Foundation 3 Day

    ITIL Version 3

    C on ti nua l Servic e Im prove m ent

    Roles

    Reporting Analyst

    Knowledge M anagem ent P roces s O wner

    Service Owner

    CSI Manager

    Service Manager

    Process Owner

    Ens ure l ine m anagem ent rec eiv es the neces s ar y sta ff resourc es and appr opria te tra in ing.

    Ens ur es that the ro les are docum ented, reviewed & audited

    Ens ur ing a l l re lev ant s taff ar e tra ined in the proces s and the i r ro le

    Addres sing any iss ues wi th the running of the proces s

    Prov id ing input to the ongoing Servic e Im provem ent Plan

    Rev iew ing any propos ed enhanc em ents to the proc es s

    Im proving the effectiv enes s and effic ienc y of the proces s

    As sis ting wi th and being u l tim ate ly responsib le for the proces s design

    Rev iew ing KPIs and tak ing ac tion requi red fo l low ing the analy sis

    Define the KPIs to evaluate the effec tiv enes s and effic ienc y of the pr oc es s

    D oc um enting and publ iciz ing the proc ess

    Ens ur es that the i r proc es s is be ing perform ed acc ord ing to the agreed and doc um ented pr oc es s

    Al l proc ess es need Proc ess Ow ners . Thei r r es ponsib i li ties include:

    Outputs

    Servic e Im prov em ent P lans

    Servic e Im provem ent Ac tions

    Audits

    Assessments

    InputsServ ice Cata logue

    Serv ice Portfol io

    Serv ice Knowledge M anagem ent Sy s tem (SKM S)

    Processes

    PDCA

    Act

    Check

    Do

    Plan

    7 Step Improv ement M ethod

    7 Im plem enting c orrec tiv e ac tion

    6 Pres enting and us ing the inform ation

    5 Analy sing the data

    4 Proces s ing the data

    Outputs

    Logic a l groupings of data ready for analy sis .

    Reports

    Updated Av ailab i li ty and Capaci ty Plans

    Inputs

    Report tem plate

    Report fr equenc y

    List o f m etric s, K PI, CS F, objec tiv es and goals

    Serv ic e Cata logue

    OLAs

    SLAs

    Reporting requi rem ents

    Data co l lected through m oni tor ing

    3 Gathering the data

    Outputs

    Agreement on the in tegri ty o f the data.

    Collection of data

    Input on IT c apabi li ty

    Monitoring plan

    Identi fied too ls to us e

    Monitoring procedures

    Updated Avai labi l i ty and C apac i ty Plans

    Inputs

    Cus tom er s atis faction surv ey s.

    L is t o f what to m eas ur e

    Gap analy sis report

    L is t o f what y ou can m eas ur e

    Lis t o f w hat you s hould m eas ur e

    P revious trend analys is reports

    Serv ic e im prov em ent plans

    Av ai lab il i ty and Capaci ty Plans

    E xis ting moni toring and data c apture c apabi li ty

    Existing SLAs

    New bus iness requi rem ents

    2 Define what y ou can m easure Inputs

    Existing reports.

    Tec hnic a l and us er m anuals from ex is ting too ls

    Work ins tructions

    Procedures

    Process flows

    Lis t o f what y ou s hould m eas ur e

    1 Define what y ou s hould m easure Inputs

    Balanc ed S corec ard.

    Budget cycle

    G ov ernance requi rem ents

    Legislative requirements

    Corporate, d iv is ional and departm enta l goals and objec tiv es

    Vis ion and m is sion sta tem ents

    Servic e C ata logue

    Servic e leve l r equi rem ents and targets

    C ontinuous Serv ic e Im prov em ent M odel

    H ow do w e k eep the mom entum going?

    Did we get there? Measurements & metrics

    H ow do we get there? Serv ice & proc ess im prov em ent

    Where do we want to be? Measurable targets

    Where are w e now ? B as el ine as ses s ments

    What is the vis ion? B us iness vis ion, m is s ion, goals and objec tives

    Key Concepts

    Value/Benefits

    Value on Inv estm ent (VO I): The ex tra va lue c reated by es tab l ishm ent o f benefi ts that inc lude non-m onetary or long-term outcomes

    Return on Inves tm ent (RO I): The d i fferenc e between the benefi t (s aving) ac hiev ed and the amount ex pended to ac hieve that benefi t

    Benefi ts : The gains achieved through rea l iz ation of improv em ents , us ually but not a lway s expres sed in monetary terms.

    Improv em ents : O utcom es that w hen c om pared to the befor e s tate, show a meas urable inc rease/decr eas e in a desi rab le m etric

    GoalProv ide guidance on mainta in ing the v a lue for c ustom ers through the continual ev a luation and im provem ent o f the qual i ty o f s ervic es and the ov era l l m atur ity o f the ITSM serv ice l i fecy c le and underly ing proces ses .

    Servi ce Op eratio n

    Functions

    IT Operations Managem ent Func tion

    Facilities ManagementM anagem ent o f the phys ica l IT env i ronment (D ata Centre, c omputer r oom s , rec ov ery si tes , power and c ool ing equipm ent, )

    IT O perations Contro l

    Maintenance activities

    Print and Output m anagem ent

    Bac k up and Res tore

    J ob Schedul ing,

    C ons ole M anagem ent

    O v ers ees the exec ution and m onitoring of the oper ational ac tivi ties and ev ents in the IT In fras tructure ( i.e . O perations Bridge or N etwork O per ations Centre.

    Application Management GoalM anages applic ations throughout the i r l i fec y cle P er for med by any departm ent, group or team involved in m anaging and s upporting operational applic ations

    Tec hica l M anagem ent GoalCus todian of tec hnic a l k now ledge and ex pertis e re la ted to m anaging the IT In fras tructure. E ns ures that the k now ledge requi red to design, tes t, m anage and im prove IT serv ices is identi fied, dev eloped and r efined

    Service Desk

    KPI-Metrics

    Cus tomer Satis fac tion Surv eys

    The number of c a l ls brok en dow n by tim e of day and day of week, com bined w ith the av er age c a l l-tim e m etric

    Av erage tim e to rev iew and clos e a resolv ed ca l l

    Perc entage of cus tomer or user updates c onduc ted wi th in target tim es, as defined in SLA targets

    Tota l cos t o f the Serv ic e Des k div ided by the num ber of c a lls .

    Av erage Servic e Des k cos t o f handling an inc ident

    Av erage time to esc alate an inc ident (where fi rs t-line res olution is not poss ib le)

    Av erage tim e to res olv e an inc ident (when resolv ed at firs t l ine)

    The fi rs t-line res olution ra te

    percentage of c al ls res olv ed by the Serv ic e D es k s taff them s elv es wi thout hav ing to s eek deeper s upport fr om other groups

    percentage of ca l ls resolv ed during the fi rst contact wi th the Servic e Des k , i.e . w hile the us er is sti l l on the te lephone to repor t the ca l l

    percentage of ca l ls resolv ed at firs t l ine, wi thout the need for es calation to other s upport groups .

    Staffing

    Super Users Us er c omm uni ty spec ia l ist

    S taff r etention

    Tra in ing and Mentoring

    Skill levels

    Technical awareness

    Serv ic e awareness

    Business awareness

    Interpersonal skills

    Staffing levels

    The num ber of c us tom ers and users to support

    Siz e, re la tive age, design and c om plex i ty o f the IT In frastruc ture

    Bus ines s requir em ents , s uch as budget, ca l l res pons e tim es, e tc.

    Cus tomer s ervic e ex pec tations

    Or ganiz ational Struc ture O ptions

    Vi rtua l S ervic e Des k Im press ion there is a s ing le S erv ic e Des k

    Centralized Service Desk

    Leveraged h igher s ki l l lev els

    Higher v o lum e of ca l ls

    Ec onom y , e fficiency and effec tiv eness

    Local Serv ice Des k

    Specia l iz ed groups, users , V IP , s ervic es that requi re spec ia l ist

    Different time zones

    Language and c u ltura l or po li tica l d i fferences

    Goal The primary a im of the Serv ic e D esk is to res tore the norm al s ervic e to the us er s as qu ick ly as pos s ib le

    Roles

    Serv ice Des k ro les

    Super Users

    Servic e Des k Analys ts

    Serv ic e Des k Superv is or

    Servic e Des k M anager

    Applic ation M anagem ent ro lesAppl ications Analy s t/Arc h itec t

    Appl ications Managers /Team -leaders

    IT O per ations M anagem ent ro les

    IT Operators

    IT Operations A naly s ts

    Shift Leaders

    IT Operations Manager

    Tec hnic a l M anagem ent r oles

    Technical Operator

    T ec hnica l Analy s ts/Ar ch i tects

    T ec hnica l M anagers /Team-leaders

    Ac ces s M anagem ent r oles

    Operations Management

    Technica l and Applic ation Management

    Service Desk

    Access Manager

    Request Ful fi llm ent ro le Service Desk

    Ev ent M anagem ent Roles

    Operations Management

    Tec hnica l and Applic ation M anagement

    Service Desk

    Event M anager

    Problem M anagem ent ro lesProblem Solving G roups

    s upport c ontractors

    suppliers

    technic al s upport groups

    Problem Manager

    Incident M anagem ent ro les

    Third-line

    N ote: D epending upon where an organiz ation dec ides to sourc e i ts support s erv ic es, any of the abov e groups

    c ould be in ternal or external groups.

    Env i ronm enta l Equipm ent M aintainers /Suppl iers.

    H ardware M aintenanc e Engineers

    Database Support

    Application Management

    Desktop Support

    Server Support

    V oic e Support (i f s eparate)

    Network Support

    Thi rd-l ine s uppor t wi l l be provided by a num ber of interna l tec hnic a l gr oups and/or th i rd- party

    suppliers/maintainers. They include:

    Second-line

    C an be outs ourc ed if the Servic e Des k i tse l f has been outs our ced.

    A s econd-l ine s upport m anager (or s uperv isor if jus t a sm al l group) wi l l nor mal ly head th is group

    P rovide tra in ing/awarenes s to Serv ic e D es k and other during bus y periods or sta ff s hortages .

    Prov ide good com m unic ation wi th Serv ice Des k

    H andle many of the les s c ompl icated inc idents , leav ing m ore s pecia l is t ( th i rd-l ine) s upport gr oups

    W or k on incident d iagnos is and resolution wi thout interferenc e from te lephone in terruptions

    M ade up of s taff w i th gr eater ( though s til l gener al ) tec hnic a l s ki l ls than the Serv ice D esk

    Fi rst-l ine (S er vic e Des k )

    Us es Tec hnic a l or Appl ication Managem ent s ta ff to be on the Servic e Des k .

    P erform ac tions s eparate from the other Servic e O per ation functions.

    P rov ides a point o f c om munication to the us er s and a po int o f c oor dination for sev era l IT groups and processes.

    The prim ary po int o f c ontac t for us ers when ther e is a s erv ic e d isr uption, for s er vic e reques ts or ev en for s om e c ategories of Reques t for C hange.

    Incident Manager

    D evelop ing and mainta in ing the Inc ident M anagem ent proces s and proc edures .

    M anaging M ajor Inc idents

    Develop ing and m ainta in ing the Incident M anagem ent s y stem s

    M oni toring the effec tiv eness of Inc ident M anagem ent and m aking rec omm endations for im prov em ent

    M anaging the w or k of inc ident s upport s ta ff ( firs t- and s econd-l ine)

    Pr oduc ing management in form ation

    D riving the effic ienc y and effec tivenes s of the Inc ident Management proc ess

    Third Line

    Second Line

    Firs t L ine (Serv ic e D es k Agent)

    Incident Manager

    Process Owner

    E ns ure l ine m anagem ent rec eiv es the nec es s ary s taff resourc es and appropr ia te tra in ing.

    Ens ures that the roles are doc um ented, rev iew ed & audited

    Ens uring a l l re levant s ta ff are tra ined in the proc es s and thei r ro le

    A ddres s ing any is sues wi th the running of the proc es s

    Prov id ing input to the ongoing Serv ic e Im provem ent Plan

    Rev iewing any propos ed enhancem ents to the proc ess

    Im prov ing the effectiv enes s and effic ienc y of the proces s

    As s is ting wi th and being u l tim ate ly respons ib le for the proces s des ign

    Rev iewing KPIs and tak ing ac tion required fo l lowing the analy s is

    Define the KPIs to evaluate the effec tiv eness and effic ienc y of the proces s

    D ocum enting and publ ic iz ing the proc ess

    Ens ures that thei r proc es s is be ing perform ed acc ord ing to the agreed and docum ented proces s

    Al l proc ess es need Proc es s Ow ners. Thei r responsib i l ities include:

    OutputsServ ice Perform anc e Reports

    Operational Services

    Operational Plans

    InputsServ ic e C ata logue

    Serv ic e Portfo lio

    Serv ic e Knowledge Management S ys tem (SKM S)

    Processes

    P roblem M anagem ent

    KPI-Metrics

    Outputs

    RFC

    Work-arounds

    KEDB

    Problem Records

    Management Information

    InputsAl l l i fec y cle proc es ses

    Incident Database

    Activities

    Errors detected in the dev elopm ent env i ronm ent

    M ajor Problem R eview

    Problem Closure

    Problem resolution

    Raising a Known Err or Rec ord

    Workarounds

    Investigation and Diagnosis

    Prioritization

    Categorization

    Problem Logging

    Problem Detec tion

    Proac tiv e P roblem M anagement In itia ted in Servic e O peration, but genera l ly driv en as part o f C ontinual Servic e Im pr ov em ent

    Reactiv e Pr oblem M anagem ent Ex ecuted as part o f S er vic e Operation and is therefore c ov ered in Serv ic e O perations

    GoalThe k ey ob jec tives of P roblem M anagem ent are to prev ent prob lem s and res ulting incidents from happening,

    to e l iminate recurr ing inc idents and to min im iz e the im pac t o f inc idents that cannot be prevented.

    Ac ces s M anagement

    KPI-Metrics

    Outputs

    Us er in form ation

    Identity

    Management Information

    Inputs

    A request fr om the m anager of a departm ent, who c ould be perform ing an HR ro le , or who c ould hav e made a dec is ion to s tart using a s ervic e for the fir st tim e.

    A r eques t from the appropria te Hum an R es ourc es Managem ent pers onnel (whic h s hould be channelled v ia

    the Serv ic e D es k ). Th is is us ually generated as part o f the pr oc es s for h iring, prom oting, re loc ating and termination or reti rem ent.

    A Serv ice Reques t. Th is is us ually in itia ted through the S er vic e Des k, or d irec tly in to the R eques t Fulfi lm ent

    sy s tem, and ex ecuted by the re lev ant Technic al or Applic ation M anagem ent teams .

    An R FC. This is mos t frequently us ed for lar ge-s c ale serv ice in troductions or upgrades w here the rights o f a

    sign i fic ant number of us ers need to be updated as part of the pro jec t.

    Activities

    Rem ov ing or R estric ting Rights

    Logging and T rac k ing acc es s

    M oni toring Identi ty Status

    Providing Rights

    Verification

    Requesting Access

    GoalThe purpos e of the Ac ces s M anagem ent pr oc es s is to prov ide the rights for us ers to be able to ac ces s a s erv ic e or gr oup of serv ices , w hi le prev enting ac ces s to non- authorized us ers .

    R eques t Ful fi llem ent

    KPI-Metrics

    Lev el of cl ient s atis faction w ith the handl ing of Serv ic e R eques ts (as m eas ured in s ome form of satis fac tion survey)

    The av er age c ost per ty pe of Serv ic e Request

    The num ber and perc entage of Servic e R eques ts com pleted w i thin agreed target tim es

    The m ean e laps ed time for handl ing eac h ty pe of Servic e Reques t

    The siz e of curr ent bac k log of outs tanding Serv ice R eques ts

    Br eak down of s ervic e requests at each s tage (e.g. logged, WIP, c losed, e tc .)

    The to ta l number of Serv ic e R eques ts (as a contro l m easure)

    OutputsIncident Managem ent

    A s trong link is a lso needed between Reques t Ful film ent, Releas e, A ss et and C onfiguration M anagement

    Inputs S ervic e D esk /Incident M anagem ent

    Activities

    Closure

    Fulfillment

    O ther appr ov al

    Financial approval

    M enu se lection

    Goal

    The purpose of Reques t Ful fi llm ent is to enable us ers to request and receive standard s ervic es; to sourc e

    and deliv er these serv ices ; to prov ide inform ation to users and cus tom ers about s ervic es and procedures for obta in ing them; and to as sis t w ith genera l in form ation, c om pla in ts and c om m ents.

    Ev ent Managem ent

    KPI-Metrics

    Outputs

    Corre la tion Engines c onta in deta i led r ules to determ ine the s ign i fic anc e and appr opria te res pons e to events

    Vendor s m oni toring too ls agent software

    M anagem ent In form ation Bas es (M IBs ) o f IT dev ic es

    SNM P m es s ages , w hic h are a standard w ay of com m unic ating tec hnica l in form ation about the s tatus of com ponents of an IT Infras truc ture

    Incident M anagem ent

    Inputs

    A s i tuation where a dev ice, database or appl ic ation, e tc. has reac hed a predefined threshold of perform anc e

    Ac ces s of an appl ic ation or databas e by a us er or automated proc edure or job

    A s tatus c hange in a dev ic e or database rec ord

    The c ompletion of an autom ated tas k or job

    An ex c eption wi th in a busines s pr oc es s that is be ing moni tored by Event M anagem ent

    Ex ceptions to any leve l o f C I perfor manc e defined in the des ign s pec i fic ations , O LAs or SO Ps Ex ceptions to an automated proc edur e or proc es s

    Activities

    Ev ent C los ure

    Action Review

    R epons e Selection

    Triggering

    Ev ent Corre la tion

    Ev ent S ign i ficanc e D eterm ination

    Ev ent Fi ltering

    Ev ent Detec tion

    Ev ent Noti fic ation

    Instrumentation

    GoalTo m onitor and c ontro l the IT in fras tructure to detec t, corr ela te and determ ine the appr opria te ac tion To c om m unic ate a l l ev ents that has or c an reduc e the qual i ty o f serv ice to Inc ident M anagem ent.

    Inc ident M anagem ent

    KPI-Metrics

    Num ber of incidents reopened and as a perc entage of the to ta l

    A verage c os t per inc ident

    Perc entage of incidents handled wi th in agreed res pons e tim e

    Mean e lapsed tim e to ac hiev e incident res olution or c i rcum v ention, brok en dow n by impac t c ode

    N umber and perc entage of m ajor incidents

    S iz e of c urrent inc ident bac klog

    B reak down of inc idents at eac h s tage ( e.g. logged, work in progres s, c losed etc )

    Total num bers of Inc idents (as a c ontro l m eas ur e)

    Roles

    Third-line

    Second-line

    Firs t-l ine [Serv ic e D esk ]

    Incident Manager

    Outputs

    M anagem ent in form ation (reports).

    Communication to Customers

    R esolv ed and c losed Inc idents

    R FC for Inc ident resolution; updated Inc ident record (includ ing resolution and/or Work -arounds )

    Inputs

    Res pons e on R FC to effect res olution for Inc ident(s ).

    Resolution details

    Res pons e from Incident m atc hing agains t Pr oblem s and Know n Errors

    Configuration deta ils from the C onfiguration M anagem ent D atabas e ( CM DB)

    Inc ident deta i ls s ourc ed from (for exam ple) Serv ice Des k, netw orks or c om puter operations

    Activities

    Closure

    Res olution and Rec overy

    Investigation and Diagnosis

    Major Inc ident Handling

    EscalationHierarchical Escalation

    Functional Escalation

    Ini tia l Diagnosis Find a M atch in the KEDB Fol low S tandard Operating Proc edure

    Prioritization

    Other in form ation

    Money

    Regulatory or legis lativ e breac hes

    Effect on busines s reputation

    The leve l o f financia l loss /ris k

    The num ber of serv ices affected m ay be m ul tip le serv ices

    Ris k to l i fe or l imb

    Urgency

    Impact

    Categorization

    Logging

    C los ure date and tim e.

    Closure category

    R es olution date and tim e

    Ac tivi ties undertak en to r es olve the inc ident

    R elated problem /Known Error

    Support group/per son to w hic h the inc ident is a l loc ated

    Related CI

    Inc ident s ta tus (ac tiv e, wai ting, c los ed, e tc.)

    Description of symptoms

    C al l -back method (te lephone, m ai l, e tc.)

    Name/department/phone/location of user

    M ethod of notific ation (te lephone, automatic , e-m ai l , in pers on, e tc .)

    N am e/ID of the pers on and/or group record ing the incident

    Date/time recorded

    Inc ident pr iori tization

    Incident impact

    Incident urgency

    Inc ident c ategorization (sub-c ategories )

    U nique referenc e num ber

    A ll inc idents m ust be ful ly logged and date/tim e s tamped. The in form ation logged would include:

    Identification

    Inc idents should be resolv ed before they have an im pac t on users !

    Key c omponents should be m oni tored s o that fa ilures or potentia l fa i lures are detec ted early s o that the incident c an be resolved quic kly

    It is us ual ly unac c eptable, from a busines s pers pectiv e, to wai t unti l a user is im pacted and c ontac ts the Service Desk

    W ork c annot begin on dealing wi th an incident unti l i t is known that an inc ident has oc c urred

    GoalThe prim ary goal of the Inc ident M anagem ent pr oc es s is to r es tore norm al serv ice operation as qu ic k ly as

    pos sib le and m in imiz e the adv ers e im pac t on business operations.

    Ke y Concep ts

    Self Help

    Front- end Self-H elp capabi li ties wi l l be needed to a llow users to subm it reques ts v ia som e form of

    web-based, m enu-driv en se lection proces s

    A w eb interfac e to a llow se l f-he lp and s erv ic e requests to be input via In ternet/In tranet s creens

    Should hav e a d i rec t interfac e in to the back -end proces s -handl ing softw ar e

    The technology s hould therefore s upport th is capabil i ty wi th s ome form of web fr ont-end a l low ing web pages to be defined offering a m enu-driven range of Sel f-Help and Serv ice R eques ts

    Many organiz ations find i t benefic ia l to o ffer S el f-H elp c apabil i ties to the i r us er s

    Directory Services A s pec i fic ty pe of tool that is used to m anage ac c es s and rights .

    Serv ic es or s erv ic e groups.grant each us er or group of us ers acc ess to the whole s et of s erv ices that they are entitled to us e at the

    same time

    M ost users do not us e only one s erv ic e, and users perform ing a s im i lar s et o f activ ities wi l l use a sim i lar set

    o f s erv ic es .

    Rights (a lso ca l led privi leges , lev e ls o f acc ess )Inc ludes read, wri te , ex ec ute, c hange, de lete.

    The ac tual s ettings a us er is provided acc es s to a serv ice

    Identity

    By defini tion, the Identity o f a user is un ique to that user.

    The in form ation about them that d is tinguis hes them as an ind ividual and which veri fies the i r sta tus wi th in the

    organization

    Access The leve l and ex tent o f a serv ice s functionali ty or data that a us er is enti tled

    Priority A func tion of Im pact, U rgency and other fac tors (m oney , risk , e tc ) The order in which i t is done

    UrgencyA m eas ure of how long i t w il l be until an Inc ident, Pr oblem or C hange has a s ign i fic ant Im pac t on the

    Business

    ImpactA m eas ure of the effect of an Incident, Problem or Change on Bus ines s Proc es s es Based on how Serv ic e

    Lev els w il l be affected

    Problem Solv ing Techniques

    Pareto Analy s is

    Ishikawa Diagrams

    Brainstorming

    Kepner and Tregoe

    Pain Value Analys is

    Chronological Analysis

    Known Error D atabas e (K EDB) The Known E rror D atabas e (KE DB) is a databas e c onta in ing al l Know n Error Rec or ds

    Known Error A P roblem that has a doc um ented Root C aus e and a W or karound

    Workaround Reduc ing or e l im inating the Im pac t o f an Inc ident or Problem for which a fu l l Res olution is not y et av a ilab le

    ProblemA pr oblem is a caus e of one or m ore inc idents . The c ause is not usual ly known at the tim e a problem r ec ord

    is c reated, and the problem m anagem ent proc ess is res ponsib le for further inv estigation.

    Service RequestA serv ice r eques t is a r eques t from a user for in form ation or adv ice, or for a standard change, or for ac ces s to

    an IT s ervic e.

    Alert A warn ing that a thres hold has been reac hed, som eth ing has c hanged, or a Fai lure has oc c ur red.

    Event An ev ent is a c hange of s ta te that has sign i fic ance for the m anagem ent o f a c onfiguration i tem or IT s er vic e.

    IncidentAn incident is an unplanned in terr uption to an IT serv ice, or a r educ tion in the qual i ty o f an IT serv ice. Fa i lur e of

    a c onfiguration i tem that has not y et impac ted serv ice is a lso an inc ident.

    Value/Benefits

    O ptim ize the s ervic e to use new too ls to m anage i t m ore effec tive ly , e ffic iently and ec onom ic al ly

    D eploy s olu tions through v ery high rate of tec hnolog ica l c hange

    Link func tional ity o f a s pec i fic s erv ic e to the c os t ex pec tation from the c ustom er.

    J us ti fy addi tional funding for tools or ac tions (inc lud ing tra ining) a im ed at improv ing the effic ienc y of Serv ice

    Operation.

    Us e Inc ident and Problem M anagement to resolv e oper ational iss ue.

    Prov ide a formal m ec hanis m to rev iew oper ational serv ic es for des ign and va lue.

    R ec ogniz e and fix des ign flaw s or unforeseen requi rements .

    M ainta in oper ations wi th in the budget and w i th in the R eturn on Inves tment targets es tab l ished earl ier in the lifecycle.

    From a c ustom er v iew point, Serv ice Operation is w here ac tua l va lue is seen.

    GoalProv ide guidance on del ivering agreed leve ls o f s ervic e to us ers and cus tomers , and to m anage the applic ations , technology and in frastruc ture that support de l iv ery of the s ervic es.

    Se rv ice T ra nsit io n

    Roles

    Bui ld and Tes t Env ironm ent Staff

    Early L i fe Support

    Deployment Staff

    Releas e P ack aging and Bui ld Manager

    Release and Deploym ent M anager

    Serv ic e Tes t Manager

    Perform anc e and R is k Ev aluation M anager

    Serv ice Ass et and C onfiguration Managem ent and Change M anagem ent ro les

    C hange Adv isory Board

    Change manager

    C hange A uthori ty

    Configuration Control Board

    C MS /too ls admin istra tor

    C onfiguration adm in istra tor/l ib rarian

    Configuration analyst

    Configuration manager

    S ervic e as set m anager

    Planning and Support

    Serv ice Transi tion m anager

    Process Owner

    E ns ure l ine m anagem ent rec eiv es the nec es s ary s taff resourc es and appropr ia te tra in ing.

    Ens ures that the roles are doc um ented, rev iew ed & audited

    Ens uring a l l re levant s ta ff are tra ined in the proc es s and thei r ro le

    A ddres s ing any is sues wi th the running of the proc es s

    Prov id ing input to the ongoing Serv ic e Im provem ent Plan

    Rev iewing any propos ed enhancem ents to the proc ess

    Im prov ing the effectiv enes s and effic ienc y of the proces s

    As s is ting wi th and being u l tim ate ly respons ib le for the proces s des ign

    Rev iewing KPIs and tak ing ac tion required fo l lowing the analy s is

    Define the KPIs to evaluate the effec tiv eness and effic ienc y of the proces s

    D ocum enting and publ ic iz ing the proc ess

    Ens ures that thei r proc es s is be ing perform ed acc ord ing to the agreed and docum ented proces s

    Al l proc ess es need Proc es s Ow ners. Thei r responsib i l ities include:

    Serv ice Knowledge M anagem ent proc es s ow ner

    Ac ts as an adv is er to bus ines s and IT pers onnel on Knowledge M anagem ent matters , includ ing polic y dec is ions on storage, v alue, w or th etc

    M onitors publ ic i ty regard ing the knowledge in form ation to ensure that in form ation is not dupl icated and is rec ogniz ed as a centra l s our ce of in form ation etc .

    Ens ures a ll knowledge i tem s are made ac ces s ib le to thos e who need them in an efficient and effectiv e manner

    M ainta ins the c ontro lled k nowledge item s to ensure currenc y

    Identifies , c ontro ls and stores any in form ation deem ed to be pertinent to the serv ices prov ided, w hic h is not

    av a ilab le via any other means

    Is the arc h i tec t o f knowledge identi fication, capture and m aintenance

    U ndertak es the Know ledge M anagem ent r ole , ens uring c om pl ianc e w i th the organization s po lic ies and

    processes

    Test Support

    Cus tom ers and us ers perform c us tom er and user acc eptanc e tes ting.

    Serv ic e D es ign wi l l design the tes t,

    The developer /suppl ier is responsib le for es tab lis h ing the root c aus e of tes t fa i lures

    Tes t analy s ts c arry out the tes ts

    The change m anager is res ponsib le for ens ur ing that tes ts are developed appr opria te to approv ed changes

    Outputs

    CMDB

    SKM S Updated

    Tes ted S olutions

    Transition Plans

    Doc um entation for a trans ferr ed or dec omm is sioned s ervic e.

    Updated c ontrac t portfo lio

    Updated Serv ice P ortfol io and s ervic e c ata logue

    Updated Serv ic e pac kage or s erv ic e bundle that defines the end-to-end s ervic e(s) o ffer ed to cus tom ers

    Approved serv ice re leas e pac kage and as s ociated deploy m ent pack ages

    Inputs

    Reques ts for Change (R FCs )

    Acceptance Criteria

    Deployment plan

    Release design

    Design and in terfac e spec i fic ations

    Servic e Operations m odel

    ISO/IEC 20000)

    Servic e M anagem ent in tegrated proc es s model (as in

    Capacity/resource model

    O wners hip/Tota l Cos t o f Uti liz ation)

    Financial/economic/cost model

    Servic e s tructure

    Servic e defin ition

    Servic e D esign P ack ages

    Serv ic e C ata logue

    Serv ic e Portfo lio

    Serv ic e Knowledge Management S ys tem (SKM S)

    Serv ic e Des ign Pac kage

    Processes

    Evaluation

    KPI-Metrics

    Cy c le tim e to perform an evaluation (low and r educ ing).

    Num ber of fa i led des igns that hav e been transi tioned (z ero)

    N umber of inc idents agains t the s erv ic e (low and reduc ing).

    Variance from s er vic e performanc e requi red by c us tom ers (m in im al and reducing)

    Outputs

    Evaluation report.

    Test resu l ts and report

    SDP, SAC

    Service package

    Serv ic e P ortfo l io

    Activities

    Ris k m anagem ent

    Ev aluation of ac tua l perfor manc e

    Ev aluation of pr ed ic ted perfor manc e

    Fac tors for cons idering the effec t o f a s ervic e c hange

    Unders tanding the un intended effect o f a change

    Unders tanding the in tended effect of a c hange

    Evaluation plan

    Evaluation process

    Serv ice ev aluation term s

    Inputs

    Tes t res u lts and report.

    SD P and S AC

    Service package

    Goal

    Ensuring that the s ervic e wi l l be us efu l to the bus ines s is c entra l to s uc ces sfu l S er vic e Transi tion and th is ex tends in to ens uring that the s erv ice w i ll c ontinue to be re lev ant by estab l is h ing appropria te m etric s and

    measurement techniques.

    Serv ic e Val idation and Tes ting

    KPI-Metrics

    R epai r effort per centage

    S tage c onta inm ent analy sis by s er vic e li fec yc le s tage

    Res olution effectiv enes s rate

    Problem resolution ra te

    Is s ue and risk ra te

    Inc ident, pr ob lem , event r ates

    Test planning, pr eparation, exec ution ra tes

    Cos t and resourc es required from user and cus tomer inv o lvem ent (e .g. us er acc eptanc e tes ting).

    C lear unders tanding of ro les and respons ib i l ities as soc iated wi th the new or c hanged serv ice betw een the c us tom ers , us ers and s ervic e prov ider

    Inc reas ed mutual understanding of the new or changed s ervic e

    R educ ed delay s in tes ting that im pact the business

    More effec tiv e us e of res ource and inv o lv em ent from the cus tom er /bus ines s

    Reduction in the im pac t o f inc idents and errors in l iv e that are attributab le to new ly tr ans i tioned s ervic es

    E ar ly v a lidation that the s er vic e wi l l de l iver the predicted v a lue that enables early c orrec tion

    Outputs

    Analys is o f the res ults , e .g . c om par is on of ac tual resu l ts wi th ex pec ted res ults , ris k s identi fied during tes ting activities.

    R esul ts from thos e tes ts

    Tes ting c ar ried out (includ ing options c hos en and c ons tr ain ts enc ountered)

    C onfiguration basel ine of the tes ting env i ronment

    Activities

    Tes t c lean up and c losure

    Evaluate exi t c riteria and repor t

    Perform tests

    Pr epare tes t env i ronment

    Verify tes t p lan and tes t des ign

    Plan and des ign test

    Val idation and test m anagem ent

    Inputs

    RFC

    Acceptance Criteria

    R eleas e and Deploy m ent P lans

    Serv ice Des ign Pac kage

    S ervic e Prov ider In terfac e Defin ition

    SLP

    T he S ervic e Pac kage

    GoalThe k ey purpos e of serv ice v a l idation and tes ting is to prov ide objec tiv e ev idenc e that the new /c hanged

    s er vic e s upports the bus ines s requi rem ents , inc lud ing the agreed S LA s.

    Transi tion Planning and Support

    KPI-Metrics

    Pro jec t and serv ice team s atisfac tion w i th the Servic e Trans ition prac tic es.

    Reduc tion in tim e and res our ce to dev elop and m ainta in in tegrated p lans and c oord ination activ i ties

    Im prov ed efficienc y and effec tivenes s of the proc ess es and s upporting s y stem s, too ls , k nowledge,

    inform ation and data to enable the trans i tion of new and c hanged s ervic es, e.g . sharing tool l ic enc es

    Better m anagem ent in formation on the predic ted v s actua l performanc e and c os t o f S er vic e Transi tion

    Im proved S er vic e Transi tion s uc c ess ra te through im proved s c ope and in tegration of the planning ac tivi ties

    Reduc tion in num ber of is s ues , r is k s and delay s c aus ed by inadequate p lanning.

    Increas ed c ustom er and us er satisfac tion wi th p lans and c omm unications that enable the bus iness to a lign

    thei r ac tivi ties wi th the Serv ic e Trans i tion p lans

    Reduc ed varia tion of ac tua l vs predicted s c ope, qual ity , c ost and tim e

    The num ber of re leas es im plem ented that m et the c us tom er s agr eed requi rem ents in ter ms of cos t, quali ty , sc ope, and re lease sc hedule ( ex pres sed as a per centage of a l l re leas es )

    OutputsIntegrated s et o f Serv ic e Trans ition p lans.

    Transition strategy

    Activities

    Planning and coord inating Servic e Trans ition

    Reviewing the plans

    Adopting program and pr ojec t m anagem ent bes t prac tic es

    Integrated planning

    P lanning an ind iv idual Servic e Trans ition

    Prepare for Serv ice Trans i tion

    C hec k ing trans ition readines s.

    C hec k ing that the c onfiguration basel ines ar e recorded in C onfiguration Managem ent before the start o f

    Serv ice Transi tion (s ee par agraph 4.3.4.2)

    Identify ing, ra ising and s c hedul ing RFC s

    R ev iew and c heck the input de l iverables, e.g . S DP, S er vic e Ac ceptance C ri teria and ev aluation report (s ee paragraph 4.6.6)

    R ev iew and ac ceptance of inputs from the other s erv ic e l i fec y cle s tages

    Transition strategyThe Serv ic e Trans i tion s tra tegy defines the overa l l appr oac h to organizing Serv ice Trans i tion and a l locating resources.

    Inputs

    Serv ice Ac c eptanc e Cri teria ( SAC) .

    Release pack age defin ition and des ign s peci fication

    Serv ice Des ign pac k age

    Authorized RFC

    GoalP lan and c oord inate the res our ces to ensure that the requi rem ents of Serv ic e Strategy enc oded in S er vic e

    D esign are effectiv e ly rea l iz ed in Serv ice O perations

    Releas e and Deploym ent Management

    KPI-Metrics

    Outputs

    Serv ic e Tr ans i tion Report.

    Deploy m ent ready re leas e pack age (bas el ined) for fu ture deploym ents

    Servic e c apac i ty plan that is a ligned to the re lev ant business p lans

    Com plete and ac c urate configuration i tem l ist

    Tes ted c ontinu i ty p lans

    New or c hanged s ervic e reports

    Servic e m odel that des cribes the s tr uc ture and dy nam ic s of how the s er vic e is operated and m anaged

    SLA, underp inn ing O LAs and contrac ts

    SLP that defines the s erv ice lev e l requi rem ents

    Serv ic e pac kage that defines the requi rem ents fr om the bus iness /cus tom er for the s erv ic e

    New or c hanged Serv ic e M anagem ent doc umentation

    Updated serv ic e cata logue w i th the relev ant in form ation about the new or changed serv ice

    Servic e noti fic ation

    Com pleted R FCs for the re leas e and deploy m ent activ ities

    Release and deploy m ent p lan

    Activities

    Rev iew and c los e Serv ice Transi tion

    Rev iew and c los e a deploym ent Post im plementation review of a deploym ent through Change M anagem ent.

    Early l ife s upport

    Veri fy deploym ent

    Perform trans fer, deploy m ent and R eti rem ent

    D ecom m is s ion ing and s erv ic e re ti rement

    Deploy service

    Transfer service

    Deploy Serv ic e M anagem ent c apabi l ity

    D eploy pr oc es ses and m ateria ls

    Trans fer/trans i tion bus ines s and organiz ation

    Trans fer financia l as s ets

    Plan and prepare for deploy m entDev elop p lans and pr epare for deploy ment

    Assessment

    Serv ice tes ting and p ilo ts

    Pilots

    A ct tak e action fo llowing the rehearsa l

    C hec k doc um ent the day

    D o de l iver the rehears a l

    P lan prepar e for the day

    S ervic e rehears a ls

    Bui ld and Test

    B ui ld and m anage the test env i ronments

    Releas e pac k aging

    Components

    A cqui re and test input c onfiguration item s and

    R eleas e and build doc um entation

    Preparation for bu i ld , test and Deploy m ent

    Planning

    Financial/commercial planning

    Logis tics and del iv er y p lanning

    Planning re lease pack aging and bui ld

    Planning Pilots

    Bui ld and tes t prior to production

    Pass/fail criteria

    Release and D eploy ment Plans

    Inputs

    Ex i t and entry c ri teria for eac h stage of re leas e and deploy ment.

    Release and deploy m ent m odels inc luding tem plate p lans

    Release pol ic y and re leas e des ign fr om Serv ic e D esign

    Envi ronm ent requirem ents and s pec i fic ations for bu ild , tes t, re lease, tr ain ing, d is as ter rec overy , p i lo t and

    deployment

    Bui ld m odels and p lans

    Ac quired serv ice ass ets and c omponents and the ir docum entation

    Tec hnology and proc ur em ent standards and c atalogues

    Serv ic e M anagem ent and operations p lans and s tandar ds

    IT s er vic e c ontinu ity p lan and re lated bus ines s c ontinu ity p lan

    SDP , inc lud ing s erv ic e m odel and S AC

    Serv ice pac kage, SLP

    Authorized RFC

    GoalThe goal o f the Releas e and D eploy m ent Management pr oc es s is to ass em ble and pos i tion a l l as pec ts of

    s erv ic es in to produc tion and es tab lis h effectiv e use of new or c hanged s erv ices .

    Knowledge Management

    KPI-Metrics

    Low er incident, problem and error res o lution tim es in fluenced by better targeted support s ta ff tra in ing

    R educ tion in the us er error category of errors due to targeted knowledge transfer, c oupled w i th cheaper us er training costs

    R educ ed dependenc y on pers onnel for k now ledge.

    R educ ed tim e to find in for mation for d iagnos is and fixing incidents and problem s

    R educ ed time and effort requi red to s upport and mainta in serv ices

    Know ledge d is sem ination

    Im proved acc ess ib il i ty and m anagem ent of s tandards and pol icies

    Inc reas ed responsiv enes s to c hanging busines s demands , e .g. h igher perc entage of queries

    Suc c es s fu l implem entation and early l ife operation of new and c hanged s erv ic es wi th few k nowledge-re la ted errors

    Outputs

    Serv ice Knowledge M anagem ent Bas e

    Transition Staff

    Pr oblem M anagem ent S taff

    Operations Staff

    Serv ic e Operation

    Inputs

    Transition Staff

    P roblem M anagem ent S taff

    Operations Staff

    S er vic e O peration

    Activities

    U sing the serv ice k now ledge management sy s tem

    D ata and in form ation management

    Knowledge transfer

    K now ledge M anagem ent s tra tegy

    Performance measures.

    Tec hnology and other r es ourc e requi rements

    Pol ic ies, proc ess es , proc edur es and m ethods

    Es tabl is hing ro les and res pons ib il i ties and ongoing funding

    O rganiz ational c hanges underw ay

    The gov er nanc e m odel

    Goal

    The goal of Knowledge Management is to enable organiz ations to im prove the qual ity o f management

    dec is ion m ak ing by ens uring that re l iab le and s ecure in form ation and data is av a ilab le throughout the s erv ic e lifecycle.

    S er vic e As s et and Configuration M anagem ent

    KPI-Metrics

    Roles

    Configuration L ibrarian/Adm nis tra tor

    Ass et M anager

    Configuration Manager

    Outputs

    Inputs

    Activities

    Verification and Auditing

    Status Ac counting and Reporting

    Configuration Control

    Configuration Identification

    Management and Planning

    GoalThe purpose of SACM is to identi fy , c ontro l and acc ount for s ervic e ass ets and configuration i tem s (C I),

    protec ting and ensuring the i r in tegri ty acr os s the s ervic e l ifec y cle .

    Change Management

    KPI-Metrics

    Cos t against budget.

    Staff u ti li z ation

    By in frastruc ture p la tform

    By s ervic e

    By l i fecy c le s tage

    Tim e to exec ute a change (from ini tia tion through each s tage in the l i fecy c le of a change, ending in

    completion):

    Num ber of changes recorded and trac k ed using automated too ls

    R atio o f ac c epted to r ejec ted change requests

    R atio o f p lanned v s unplanned changes (urgent, emergenc y)

    Num ber and perc entage of changes that fo llow form al Change M anagem ent procedures

    People s satis fac tion wi th the s peed, c lari ty, eas e of us e

    Volume of change.

    Frequenc y of c hange (by s ervic e, bus iness area, e tc.)

    Perc entage reduc tion in unauthoriz ed c hanges .

    Perc entage im prov em ent in im pac t analys is and s cheduling of changes safe ly, effic iently and effectiv ely

    reduces the ris k of changes affec ting the l ive env i ronment

    Perc entage im prov ement in predictions for tim e, qual i ty, cos t, ris k, resourc e and c omm erc ia l im pac t

    Serv ic e or appl ic ation re-work c aused by inadequate c hange spec ific ation

    Perc entage reduc tion in tim e, e ffort, cos t to m ake changes and re leases (e.g. by s ervic e, change ty pe, as s et

    type)

    Unauthoriz ed bus ines s /cus tomer c hange by busines s/IT/c ustom er/user ass et or c onfiguration i tem ty pe, e .g.

    application data

    Incom plete impac t as ses sm ent

    Inac curate change s peci fications (e.g. tec hnic a l , c ustom er, bus ines s )

    N umber of d is ruptions , incidents, prob lem s /errors c aused by unsuc ces s ful c hanges and re leas es

    Perc entage acc uracy in change estim ate.

    Incidents attributab le to c hanges

    Av erage time to im plement bas ed on urgenc y /pr iori ty /c hange type

    Reduc tion in the num ber of fa i led changes

    R educ tion in the num ber of changes where rem ediation is inv ok ed

    Change s ucc es s rate (perc entage of c hanges deem ed s ucc ess fu l a t r ev iew/number of RFC s approved)

    Reduc tion in the num ber and perc entage of unplanned c hanges and em ergenc y fixes

    Reduc tion in the bac klog of c hange reques ts

    R educ tion in the num ber of unauthorized c hanges

    Reduc tion in the num ber of d is ruptions to s ervic es, defec ts and re-work c aus ed by inac curate s peci fic ation, poor or inc om plete im pac t ass es sm ent

    The benefi ts o f c hange expres sed as v a lue of improv em ents m ade + negative im pacts prev ented or term inated c om pared w i th the c os ts of the c hange pr oc es s

    The num ber of c hanges im plemented to s erv ices w hic h m et the cus tomer s agreed r equi rem ents , e .g . quali ty /cos t/tim e (ex pres sed as a perc entage of a l l changes)

    Roles

    EC AB M em ber

    CA B M em ber

    C hange A pprov er

    Change Manager

    Outputs

    Change Management reports

    Change doc um ents and records

    Change dec is ions and ac tions

    Authorized change p lans

    Revised PSO

    Change s chedule

    New , c hanged or d is pos ed ass ets or c onfiguration i tem s , e .g. bas eline, s erv ic e pac kage, re lease pac k age

    Change to the s erv ic es , s erv ic e or in fras tructure res ul ting from approv ed RFCs

    Approved RFCs

    Rejected RFCs

    Inputs

    Tes t res ul ts , test report and ev aluation report.

    As -p lanned c onfiguration bas eline

    Current as s ets or c onfiguration item s , e .g. basel ine, s er vic e pack age, re leas e pac k age

    C ur rent change s chedule and PSO

    Plans c hange, trans i tion, re lease, deploym ent, tes t, ev aluation and remediation

    Change proposal

    R eques t for Change

    Pol ic y and s tra teg ies for c hange and r eleas e

    Back-out Plan

    Test Plan

    Build Plan

    Des ign Doc ument

    Activities

    C hange Adv isory B oard Meetings

    R ev iew and clos e c hange

    Coord inate change implem entation

    Plan updates

    Authorize the change

    As s ess and ev aluate the change

    Rev iew R FC and change proposal

    Record the RFC

    Goal

    The pur pos e of the C hange M anagem ent proc ess is to ens ur e that standard ized m ethods are us ed for the

    effic ient and prom pt handling of a l l c hanges , that a l l changes are rec or ded in the C onfiguration M anagem ent Sys tem and that ov er al l bus ines s risk is optimiz ed.

    Ke y Concep ts

    Serv ic e Know ledge M anagem ent Sy stem (S KM S)Sourc e of data wi ll be he ld in a c entra l log ic a l reposi tory or C onfiguration M anagem ent Sy s tem (CM S) and

    CMDB

    DIKW

    Wisdom

    Knowledge

    Information

    Data

    Release Policies

    Serv ice Transi tion P ol ic ies

    Serv ic e D esign Pac kage ( SDP)

    The S er vic e Ac ceptance C riteria .

    R eleas e and deploy ment p lans

    The deta i led des ign of how the serv ice com ponents w il l be as sem bled and integrated in to a re leas e pac kage

    The defin i tion and des ign of each re leas e pack age

    The ar ch i tectura l design requi red to de liv er the new or changed Serv ice inc lud ing c ons tra in ts

    The serv ic e m odels

    The s er vic e s peci fications

    The appl icable serv ice pac k ages (e.g. Core Servic e Pac kage, Serv ice Lev el Pac kage)

    S DP defines al l as pec ts o f an IT s ervic e and its requi rem ents through eac h s tage of its l i fec y cle . An SDP is

    produc ed for eac h new IT s erv ice, m ajor change, or IT s ervic e re tir em ent.

    Urgency

    Types of C hanges

    E mergenc y Change (urgent) Changes in tended to r epai r an error in an IT s erv ice that is negativ ely im pac ting the bus ines s to a h igh degree

    S tandard Change (pre-authorized)A Change that has been pre- approv ed; that is low r is k , re lativ e ly c om mon and fo l low s a Proc edure or Work Instruction

    N orm al Change (routine) A Change that fo llows the routine activ ities of the Change M anagem ent proc es s.

    Stakeholder Map Analysis

    Snapshot A s naps hot o f the curr ent s ta te of a configuration i tem or an env i ronment

    Service ChangeA Serv ic e Change is the addi tion, m odi fic ation or remov al o f an author is ed, p lanned or s uppor ted serv ice or serv ice c om ponent and i ts as s oc iated docum entation.

    Ris k Matrix Probabi l i ty o f the Im pact

    Release UnitA re leas e unit des c ribes the portion of a s er vic e or IT in frastruc ture that is norm al ly releas ed together ac cord ing to the organiz ation s re lease pol ic y.

    Release options

    Pullsoftware is m ade avai lable in a c entra l loc ation but us ers ar e free to pul l the s oftware down to the i r own loc ation at a tim e of the i r c hoos ing or when a us er work s tation res tarts.

    PushA pus h approac h is used w here the serv ice com ponent is deploy ed from the c entre and pus hed out to the target loc ations .

    Phasedthe s er vic e is deployed to a part o f the us er base in i tia l ly, and then repeated for subs equent parts o f the user base via a sc heduled ro l lout plan

    deploy ed to a l l user areas in one operation

    Pro jected Serv ice O utage (P SO )

    Pow er Im pac t Matrix

    Priority

    Impact

    Em otional C yc le of C hange

    O ptim al Perform anc e

    Acceptance

    Self/Internal Blame

    External Blame

    Avoid

    Shock

    Emergency CABWhen the need for em ergency c hange aris es, i .e . there m ay not be time to c onvene the fu ll C AB, i t is nec ess ary to identi fy a s mal ler organiz ation wi th authori ty to m ake emergenc y dec isions.

    Definitive Spares An area s et aside for the s ecure s torage of hardware s pares

    Defin itiv e Media L ibrary (D ML)

    M ay in cons is t o f one or more software l ibraries or file -s torage ar eas , s epar ate fr om dev elopm ent, test or l iv e file-store areas

    M aster copies of contro l led doc umentation for a sy s tem are als o s tor ed in the D ML in e lec tr on ic form

    D efin i tiv e c opies of pur chas ed s oftw are (a long wi th l icens e docum ents or in form ation), as w ell as software

    developed on site

    M as ter c opies of a l l contro l led s oftware in an organiz ation

    M as ter c opies of v ers ions that have pas s ed qual i ty ass urance chec ks

    The D efin i tiv e M edia L ibrary (DM L) is the sec ure l ibr ary in w hic h the defin i tiv e authoriz ed v ersions of a ll m edia C Is are stored and protected

    Configuration M anagem ent Sy s tem (CM S)

    Configuration Item (CI)A configuration i tem ( CI) is an ass et, s erv ic e com ponent or other i tem that is , or w i ll be, under the contro l o f

    Configuration Management

    Configuration Baseline

    A c onfiguration bas el ine is the c onfiguration of a serv ice, pr oduc t or in frastr uc ture that has been form al ly reviewed and agreed on, that thereafter s er ves as the bas is for further ac tivi ties and that c an be changed only

    thr ough formal change proc edur es

    Change Sc heduleA Change Sc hedule is s ometim es ca l led a Forward Schedule of Change, ev en though i t a ls o c onta ins in formation about Changes that have al ready been implem ented

    Change Record

    Closure

    Rev iew res ults ( inc lud ing c ros s-referenc e to new RFC where nec es sary )

    Review date(s)

    Ac tual im plem entation date and tim e

    Change im plem entation deta i ls (s uc c ess /fa il /rem ediation)

    Deta i ls o f c hange im plem enter

    Loc ation/re ferenc e to re lease/im plem entation p lan

    Sc heduled im plem entation tim e (c hange window, re lease window or date and time)

    Target c hange p lan( s) for change to be incorporated into

    Target bas el ine or re leas e to inc orporate c hange into

    Authorization date and time

    Authorization s ignature (c ould be e lec tron ic )

    Dec is ion and recom m endations ac com panying the dec is ion

    Change dec is ion body

    Would the c hange require cons equential am endm ent of IT Serv ice C ontinu i ty Managem ent (ITSCM ) plan,

    capac ity p lan, sec uri ty p lan, test p lan?

    Im pac t as s ess m ent and evaluation res ourc es and capac ity , c ost, benefi ts

    Back -out or rem ediation p lan

    Ris k as ses s ment and ris k m anagem ent p lan

    Change priori ty

    Predic ted tim efr am e, res ourc es , c os ts and qual i ty of serv ice

    Change category , e .g . m inor, sign ific ant, m ajor

    Date and time that the c hange was propos ed

    Contact and deta i ls of person propos ing the change

    Configuration i tems and bas el ine vers ions to be c hanged

    Effect of not implem enting the c hange (bus ines s , technic al , financia l e tc .)

    Reason for c hange, e.g. Busines s Cas e

    Identi ty o f i tem(s ) to be c hanged des crip tion of the des i red change

    Description

    Trigger (e .g. to purc has e order, prob lem report num ber, error rec ords, business need, leg is la tion)

    Unique number

    Change Propos al

    May be r equi red for a major c hange wi th s ign i ficant organizational and/or financia l im pl ic ations Conta ins a ful l

    des c ription of the c hange together wi th a bus ines s and financ ial jus ti fic ation for the proposed c hange Inc ludes signoff by appropria te lev e ls o f busines s m anagem ent

    Change Adv is ory Board (CA B)A body that ex ists to s uppor t the authoriz ation of c hanges and to ass ist Change Management in the

    ass ess m ent and pr iori tization of c hanges

    CA B M eeting Agenda

    Rev iew of unauthoriz ed c hanges detected through C onfiguration Managem ent.

    Adv anc e notic e of R FCs expec ted for rev iew at nex t CAB

    O uts tanding changes and c hanges in progress

    Change M anagem ent wins/ac com pl is hm ents for the period under d is cus s ion

    Rev iew the C hange Managem ent proces s

    Change reviews

    Sc hedul ing of changes and update of c hange s c hedule (C S) and PS O

    RF Cs that have been as s es s ed by CAB m embers

    RFC s to be as s ess ed by CAB m embers priority order

    Failed c hanges , unauthoriz ed, bac k ed-out changes, or c hanges appl ied wi thout re ferenc e to the C AB by inc ident m anagem ent, prob lem m anagem ent or Change Management

    7 R' s o f Change

    What is the RELATIO NS HIP between th is change and other changes?

    Who is R ESPO NS IBLE for the bu ild and tes t o f the c hange?

    What RE SOU RC ES are r equi red to de liv er the change?

    What are the R ISKS inv o lv ed in the c hange?

    What is the RETU RN requi red from the c hange?

    What is the REA SON for the change?

    Who RA ISED the c hange?

    Configuration M anagem ent Sy s tem (CM S)

    The CM S is m ainta ined by Configuration M anagem ent and is us ed by a l l IT S er vic e M anagem ent Proces s es

    The CM S inc ludes too ls for c o l lec ting, storing, m anaging, updating, and pres enting data about a ll Configuration Item s and the i r Relations hips

    M ay conta in data about em ploy ees , S uppl iers, loc ations , B usiness Uni ts, Cus tom ers and U sers

    Includes in form ation about Incidents, Problems , Known E rrors , Changes and R eleas es

    A set o f too ls and databas es that are used to m anage an IT S ervic e Prov ider s C onfiguration data

    Value/Benefits

    Timely c ancel lation or changes to m aintenance contrac ts for hardware and software when c omponents are d ispos ed or de-c om mis s ioned

    The productiv ity o f bus ines s and cus tom er sta ff bec ause of better p lanning

    The v aria tion of es tim ated v ers us actua l res ourc e p lans and budgets

    Confidenc e in the degree of com pl ianc e w ith bus ines s and gov ernanc e requi rements during c hange

    The predic tions of serv ice lev e ls and w arranties for s erv ic es

    The s uc ces s rate of c hanges and r eleas es for the business

    Trans ition management o f s erv ic es for m erger s, de-mergers , ac quisi tions

    The abil i ty to adapt qu ic kly to new requi rem ents and m ark et dev elopm ents

    Goal Pr ov ide guidanc e on deliv ering s erv ices that are requi red by the bus ines s in to operational use.

    Service Design

    Roles

    Process Owner

    Supplier Manager The Supplier Manager has respons ib i l ity for ens uring that the aim s of Suppl ier Managem ent are met.

    Serv ice Lev el M anager

    Ens ure that im pr ov em ent in i tia tiv es identi fied in serv ice reviews are ac ted on and progres s reports are

    prov ided to c ustom ers

    Ens ure that s ervic e perform anc e r ev iews are sc heduled,

    Ens ure that serv ic e reports are produc ed for each c us tom er s erv ic e and that breaches of SLA targets are h ighl ighted, inv estigated and ac tions tak en to prev ent the i r rec urrence

    E ns ure that targets agreed wi th in the UC ar e al igned wi th SLA and SLR targets

    A ss ist wi th the produc tion and m aintenanc e of Serv ice P or tfo l io , Serv ic e C ata logue, Applic ation P or tfo l io

    N egotia te and agree on O LAs

    N egotia te and agree on leve ls o f s erv ic e to be del ivered w ith the c us tom er

    E ns ure that the c urrent and future serv ice r equi rem ents are identified

    Keep aw are of changing bus iness needs

    The Serv ice Lev el M anager has res pons ibi l i ty for ens uring that the aim s of Serv ice Lev el Managem ent are

    met.

    Serv ic e D esign M anager

    Serv ice D esign M anager - The k ey r ole and res pons ib il i ties of the S er vic e Des ign M anager are c overed

    throughout th is publ ic ation and they are res pons ib le for the overa l l c oord ination and deploym ent o f qual ity s o lu tion designs for s erv ic es and proc es s es. Res pons ibi l i ties of the ro le over and abov e thos e of l ine

    m anagem ent o f a ll people inv o lved in S erv ic e

    Serv ice Cata logue M anager

    Ens ure that the inform ation wi th in the S er vic e Cata logue is adequate ly pr otec ted and bac k ed up

    Ens ure that a l l the in form ation wi th in the Servic e Cata logue is c onsis tent wi th the in for mation wi th in the Serv ic e Portfo lio

    Ens ure that a l l the in form ation w ith in the Serv ice C atalogue is ac c urate and up-to-date

    Ens ure that a l l operational s ervic es and a ll serv ices be ing prepared for operational running ar e recorded

    w ith in the Serv ice Cata logue

    Pr oduc e and m ainta in the Serv ice Cata logue

    R es ponsib le for pr oduc ing and m ainta ining an acc urate Serv ice Cata logue

    Security Manager

    Ac ting as a foca l po in t for a ll s ec uri ty iss ues .

    E ns uring that a l l acc es s to serv ic es by ex ternal par tners and s uppliers is s ubjec t to c ontractua l agreements

    and res pons ib il i ties

    E ns uring c onfidentia l i ty , in tegrity and av ai lab il i ty o f the serv ices

    P ar tic ipating in any sec uri ty reviews aris ing fr om sec urity breac hes

    Dev elop ing and doc um enting procedures

    Des ign ing s ecuri ty c ontr ols and dev elop ing s ecuri ty p lans

    P er for ming Sec uri ty Ris k Analy s is and risk m anagement

    As sis ting wi th B us iness Impac t A naly ses

    Identi fying and c lass i fying IT and in form ation as s ets

    Ensuring that the In form ation Securi ty Pol icy is enforc ed and adhered to

    Com m unic ating and publ ic izing the In form ation Securi ty Pol icy

    D evelop ing and m aintain ing the In for mation Sec urity P ol ic y and a supporting set o f spec ific po l ic ies

    R espons ib le for ens uring that IT s ec ur ity is a l igned w i th agreed bus iness s ec ur ity po l icy ris k s, im pacts and

    requirements

    Process Owner

    E ns ure l ine m anagem ent rec eiv es the nec ess ary s taff resourc es and appropr ia te tr ain ing.

    Ens ures that the ro les are doc umented, rev iew ed & audi ted

    Ens uring al l re levant s ta ff are tra ined in the proc es s and thei r ro le

    A ddres s ing any is sues w ith the r unning of the proc ess

    Prov id ing input to the ongoing Serv ic e Im provem ent Plan

    Rev iewing any propos ed enhancem ents to the proc ess

    Im prov ing the effectiv enes s and effic ienc y of the proces s

    As s is ting wi th and being u l tim ate ly respons ib le for the proces s des ign

    Rev iewing KPIs and tak ing ac tion required fo l lowing the analy s is

    Define the KPIs to evaluate the effec tiv eness and effic iency of the proces s

    D ocum enting and public iz ing the proc es s

    Ens ures that thei r proces s is being perform ed acc ord ing to the agreed and docum ented proces s

    A proces s owner is res pons ib le for ensuring that the i r proc ess is be ing per form ed ac c or ding to the agreed and docum ented proces s and is m eeting the a im s of the proc es s defini tion

    IT Serv ice C ontinu ity M anager

    Attending CAB m eetings when appropria te

    A ss ess ing c hanges for the i r im pac t on Serv ic e Continu i ty and Continui ty Plans

    N egotia ting and m anaging c ontracts w ith th i rd-party rec ov ery s ervic es

    U ndertak ing regular rev iew s

    C omm unicating and m aintain ing awarenes s of ITS CM objectiv es

    U ndertak ing qual i ty rev iew s of a ll pr oc edures

    M ainta in ing a c omprehensiv e IT tes ting s chedule

    As s ess ing potentia l s erv ic e continu i ty is sues and

    D evelop ing and mainta in ing the organization s continui ty s tra tegy

    Perform ing ris k ass es sm ent and risk management to prev ent d isas ters

    Ens uring that a l l ITSC M plans , risk s and activ ities under pin a l l BC M plans

    Im plementing and m ainta in ing the ITSC M proces s

    P er form ing Bus ines s Im pact Analy s es for a ll ex is ting and new s er vic es

    R es ponsib le for ens uring that al l s erv ic es c an be rec overed in l ine wi th the i r agreed bus ines s needs , requi rements and times c ales

    IT Planner An IT Planner is responsib le for the production and coord ination of IT p lans.

    IT D esigner/Arc h itec t

    An IT Des igner/Ar ch i tect is res ponsib le for the overa l l c oordination and des ign of the required tec hnology . O ften Des igners and Arc h i tec ts wi th in lar ge or ganiz ations would s pec ia liz e in one of the fiv e as pects of

    des ign ( see s ec tion 3). Howev er, an in tegrated approac h to design s hould alw ay s be adopted, ther efore D es igner s and Arc hi tec ts need to work together wi th in a form al method and fram ework to ens ure c ons istent

    and c om patib le designs are produced. In sm al ler organiz ations , s ome or a l l o f the ro les are us ual ly c om bined, and th is is les s of an is sue, al though a form al appr oac h s hould sti l l be used. Whenev er des igns

    are produc ed, they s hould a lway s adopt an integrated approac h, c overing a l l areas, and s hould be acc epted and s igned off by al l areas . Al l des igners need to understand how arch i tec tures , s tra teg ies , des igns and

    p lans fi t together and a ll the m ain aspec ts of design.

    Capacity Manager

    Ac ting as a foc a l po in t for a l l capac ity and perform anc e is sues

    Rec om m ending tun ing of serv ic es and s ys tem s

    Determ in ing perform anc e s erv ice lev e ls that are m ainta inable and c ost-justi fied

    Mainta in ing a k now ledge of fu ture demand for IT

    Reports on s erv ic e and com ponent perform ance

    Perform anc e tes ting of new serv ices and s y stem s

    As ses s ing new tec hniques and hardware and s oftw are products

    Sizing a l l propos ed new s er vic es and sy s tems

    Analy s is o f us age and performanc e data, and repor ting on perform ance

    Set appropriate lev e ls o f moni toring of resourc es and sy s tem per form anc e are s et

    Production, regular review and rev ision of the Capaci ty Plan

    Forecas ting fu ture c apac i ty requir em ents

    Performing s izing on al l propos ed new s erv ic es

    Understanding the current us age of the in fras tructure and IT serv ices ,

    Identi fying, wi th the Serv ic e Lev el M anager , capac ity requi rements

    Ens ur ing that there is adequate IT capac ity to m eet requi red leve ls o f s er vic e

    Res pons ibi l i ty for ens uring that the a im s of C apac i ty Management are met

    Res pons ib le for ensuring that IT c apaci ty is matc hed to agreed curr ent and fu ture bus ines s demand

    Availability Manager

    A ttending CA B m eetings w hen appropria te

    A ss es sing c hanges for the i r im pac t on al l as pec ts o f av a ilab i li ty

    As sis ting Securi ty and ITSC M wi th as ses s ment and m anagement o f ris k

    Ens uring a l l ava i lab il i ty tests and p lans are tes ted after m ajor change

    M aintain ing av ai lab il i ty tes ting s c hedule for a ll ava i lab i l ity mec hanis m s

    W or king w ith Financ ia l Management, ens uring lev e ls are c ost- jus tified

    Creating avai lab i l ity and rec overy des ign cri teria

    Creating, m ainta in ing and reviewing an AM IS and Av ailab i li ty Plan

    P roactiv ely im proving s ervic e av ailab il i ty wherev er pos sib le

    M oni toring ac tua l IT avai labi l i ty ac h iev ed agains t SLA targets

    S pec i fying the re liab il i ty , m ainta inabi l i ty and serv ic eabi l ity r equi rem ents

    Speci fy ing the requi rem ents for new or enhanc ed event m anagem ent

    P artic ipating in the IT in fras truc ture des ign

    A ss isting w i th the inves tigation and d iagnos is o f incidents and problem s

    E nsure new serv ices are designed to de liv er the lev e ls o f the SLA

    R espons ib le for ens uring that a ll serv ices m eet the ir agreed avai lab i l i ty targets

    Outputs

    Serv ice Des ign Pack ages (SDP )

    Standards

    Architectures

    Solution Designs

    Inputs

    S er vic e Knowledge Managem ent S ys tem (SK MS )

    S er vic e C ata logue

    S er vic e Portfo lio

    Business Requir em ents

    Investment Plan

    Financial Plan

    Patter ns of Bus ines s Ac tivi ty

    Processes

    Supplier M anagem ent

    KPI-Metrics

    Outputs

    Inputs

    Roles

    Activities

    Contract renew al and/or term ination

    Supplier and Contract M anagem ent and perfor manc e

    Es tabl is hing new suppl iers and c ontr ac ts

    Suppl ier c ategoriz ation and m aintenanc e of the Suppl ier and Contracts D atabas e (S CD)

    Evaluation of new s uppliers and c ontr ac ts

    GoalM anage suppl iers and the s ervic es they s upply , to prov ide seam les s quali ty o f IT s erv ic e to the bus ines s ,

    ens ur ing v a lue for m oney is obta ined

    Inform ation Sec urity Management

    KPI-Metrics

    Outputs

    Inputs

    Roles

    Activities

    Sc hedule and c ompletion of sec uri ty reviews , audi ts and penetration tes ts .

    Analy s is , reporting and reduc tion of the vo lum es and im pact of sec uri ty breac hes and inc idents

    Moni toring and management o f al l s ec ur ity breac hes and m ajor s ecuri ty incidents

    Im plementation, review, revis ion and im prov ement of a s et o f s ecuri ty c ontr ols and ris k ass es sm ent and responses

    As ses s ment and c las s ific ation of a l l in formation as s ets and docum entation

    Com munic ation, im plem entation and enforc em ent o f the sec uri ty po lic ies

    Produc tion, review and r ev ision of an ov era ll In form ation S ec uri ty Polic y and a set o f s upporting s peci fic policies

    GoalThe purpose of the ISM proces s is to al ign IT s ecuri ty wi th bus ines s sec uri ty and ens ure that inform ation s ecuri ty is effec tiv e ly managed in al l s ervic e and Serv ic e M anagem ent activ i ties

    IT Serv ic e C ontinu ity M anagem ent

    KPI-Metrics

    R egular c om munic ation of the ITSCM objec tiv es and res pons ib il i ties wi th in the appr opria te bus ines s and IT service areas.

    Ens ure that a ll IT s erv ic e areas and s taff are prepar ed and able to respond to an inv oc ation of the ITSCM Plans

    Ens ure aw ar enes s of bus ines s im pac t, needs and r equi rem ents throughout IT

    A wareness throughout the organiz ations of the p lans:

    O v era ll reduc tion in the risk and im pac t o f pos sib le fai lure of IT s ervic es.

    N egotia te and m anage a l l nec es sary ITSC M contrac ts wi th thi rd party

    R egular rev iew s are undertak en, a t least annual ly , o f the bus ines s and IT c ontinu i ty p lans w ith the bus ines s

    areas

    R egular and c om prehens ive tes ting of ITSCM Plans

    Al l s ervic e recov ery targets are agreed and doc um ented in SLAs and are achievable wi th in the ITS CM Plans

    R egular audits o f the ITSC M Plans to ens ure that, a t a l l times , the agreed recov ery requi rem ents of the bus ines s c an be ac hiev ed

    Outputs

    Financ e and Admin istra tion P lan

    Communication Plan

    Personnel Plan

    Security Plan

    Ac c omm odation and Serv ic es Plan

    C ris is M anagem ent and P ubl ic R elations Plan

    Vi ta l R ec ords Plan

    Salvage Plan

    D am age As s es s m ent P lan

    Em ergency Res ponse Plan

    ITSCM plans

    ITSC M pol icy s tra teg ies

    Serv ice c ontinu i ty and rec overy p lans

    Roles Security Manager

    Ac ting as a foca l po in t for a ll s ec ur ity is sues

    Ensuring that a l l ac ces s to s ervic es by external partners and suppl iers is s ubjec t to contrac tua l agreem ents

    and r es ponsib i li ties

    Ensuring c onfidentia l i ty, in tegri ty and av ai lab i li ty o f the s ervic es

    Participating in any s ecuri ty rev iew s aris ing from s ec uri ty breac hes

    Dev elop ing and docum enting proc edures

    Des igning s ec ur ity c ontro ls and develop ing sec urity plans

    Perform ing Securi ty R is k Analys is and ris k m anagem ent

    As s is ting wi th Busines s Im pac t Analy s es

    Identi fy ing and clas si fy ing IT and in form ation ass ets

    Ens uring that the In form ation Sec urity P ol ic y is enforced and adhered to

    Com m unic ating and publ iciz ing the In form ation Sec ur ity P ol ic y

    Dev elop ing and mainta in ing the In form ation Sec uri ty Polic y and a s upporting s et o f s pec i fic po l icies

    Activities

    Invocation

    On-going Operation Educ ation, aw arenes s , tra in ing, r ev iew, tes ting, Change M anagem ent

    Implementation

    Walk -through, Ful l, Partia l , S cenario

    Testing

    Organizational Planning

    Initiation

    ITSC M R ecov ery Options

    Off-site Storage

    Ris k R espons e Meas ures

    IT Serv ice Continu ity Strategy

    Requi rements - Risk A naly sis M _o_R

    Requi rements B us iness Im pac t Analys is (BIA)

    Requirements and Strategy

    Inputs

    IT S er vic e Continu i ty Plans and tes t reports from suppl ier and partners , w here appropria te.

    Bus ines s C ontinu ity Managem ent and Av ailab i li ty M anagem ent tes ting sc hedules

    CM S: c onta in ing in form ation on the re la tions hips between the bus iness , the s erv ices , the s uppor ting s erv ic es and the technology

    Change in formation: from the C hange M anagement proc ess , wi th a C hange S chedule and a need to as ses s a l l changes for the i r im pact on a l l ITSCM plans

    Financ ia l inform ation: from Financ ia l M anagement, the c ost o f s er vic e provis ion, the cos t o f res ources and components

    Serv ice in form ation: from the SLM proc es s , wi th deta ils o f the serv ic es from the Serv ice P ortfol io and the Serv ice C ata logue and serv ice lev e l targets w ith in SLAs and SLR s

    A Business C ontinu i ty Strategy and a s et o f Bus ines s Continu ity Plans : from a ll areas of the busines s

    IT in form ation: from the IT stra tegy and p lans and current budgets

    Bus ines s in form ation: from the organiz ation s bus ines s s tra tegy, p lans and financ ia l plans , and in form ation on the ir c ur rent and future requi rem ents

    B us iness Continui ty Plans

    GoalSuppor t the overa l l Bus ines s Continu ity M anagem ent proc ess and ens ur e that the required IT technica l and

    serv ice faci l i ties c an be resum ed w ith in requi red, and agreed, busines s times cales

    C apac i ty M anagem ent

    KPI-Metrics

    Outputs

    Inputs

    Activities

    Produc ing the Capac ity Plan

    Simulation modelling

    Analytical modelling

    Trend analy sis

    Baselining

    M odel l ing and trending

    Application sizing

    Dem and M anagem ent

    Threshold m anagement and c ontr ol

    Designing resilience

    Explo i tation of new tec hnology

    Implementation

    Tuning and optim ization

    Analysis

    Res pons e tim e moni toring

    Utilization monitoring

    GoalEns ure that cos t-justi fiab le IT c apaci ty in a ll areas of IT a lway s ex ists and is matc hed to the c urrent and fu tur e

    agreed needs of the bus ines s , in a tim ely m anner

    Availability Management

    KPI-Metrics

    Outputs

    Inputs

    Roles

    Activities

    R ecom m end Im prov ements

    Design

    Proactive Planning

    Analy s is and m anagement o f E vents , Incident and any Problem as s ociated wi th U nav ai lab i li ty

    Measuring

    Monitoring

    GoalEns ure that the lev e l of serv ice av ai lab i li ty de l iv ered in a ll s erv ic es is m atc hed to or ex c eeds the c urrent and fu ture agreed needs of the bus ines s, in a cos t-e ffectiv e m anner

    Serv ic e C ata logue M anagem ent

    KPI-Metrics

    Outputs Serv ice Cata logue

    Inputs Serv ice Portfo lio

    Activities

    Work wi th s upport, suppl iers and Configuration M anagem entEs tabl is h in ter fac es and dependenc ies betw een IT s erv ic es and the supporting s er vic es , com ponents and

    CIs c ontained wi th in the Tec hnic a l Servic e C ata logue

    Interface w i th the Business and IT S er vic e Continu i ty M anagem entEs tablis h the dependenc ies of bus ines s un its and thei r business proc es ses w i th the s upporting IT s ervic es,

    c onta ined wi th in the Bus ines s S er vic e Cata logue

    Pr oduc e and m ainta in a Serv ic e Cata logue W or king wi th Serv ic e Portfo lio M anagem ent

    In terface w i th Serv ic e Portfo l io Management To agree on the c ontents of the Serv ic e Portfo l io and Serv ice C atalogue

    Interface wi th Bus ines s R elations hip M anagem ent and Serv ice Lev el M anagem ent E ns ure the in form ation is al igned to the bus ines s proces s .

    D oc um ent the s erv ic e defin itions

    GoalThe purpos e of S ervic e Cata logue Management ( SCM ) is to prov ide a sing le , cons istent s ource of in form ation

    on a ll o f the agreed serv ices , and ens ure that i t is w ide ly avai lab le to those w ho are approv ed to acc ess i t.

    Serv ic e Lev el Management

    KPI-MetricsCost

    Quality

    Roles S er vic e Lev el Manager

    Outputs

    Underp inn ing Contracts (UC )

    O perational Lev el Agreem ent (OLA)

    Serv ic e Lev el Agreements (SLA)

    Serv ice Q ual i ty Plan

    Serv ic e Improv ement P lan (S IP )

    Serv ic e Reports: Targets

    Activities

    M ainta in up-to-date SLM doc um ent tem plates and s tandards

    Prov ide the appropria te m anagem ent in form ation to aid per form anc e m anagem ent

    Log and m anage a ll com pla in ts and c om pl iments

    D ev elop, m ainta in and operate procedures

    D evelop and docum ent contac ts and re la tionships

    C onduc t s erv ic e review and ins tigate im pr ov em ents

    P roduc e serv ic e reports

    C ol la te, m easure and im prov e c ustom er s atis faction

    M onitor and meas ure serv ice perform anc e achiev em ents

    D eterm ine, negotia te , docum ent and agree requirem ents for new or c hanged s erv ic es in SLRs

    Inputs

    C ustom er S atis faction Surv ey

    Customer Feedback

    Configuration M anagem ent S ys tem (C MS )

    C hange Sc hedule

    Serv ice Cata logue

    Service Pipeline

    Serv ice Portfol io

    Serv ice Strategy : P ol ic ies and C ons tra in ts

    B us iness Im pact Analys is (BIA)

    C urrent and fu ture Bus ines s R equi rem ents

    Financial Plan

    P ol ic y Am endm ents

    Business Strategy

    GoalThe goal o f the SLM proces s is to ensure that an agreed lev e l o f IT serv ice is provided for a ll c urrent IT

    serv ices , and that fu ture serv ices are de l iv ered to agreed achievable targets

    Ke y Concep ts

    Vi ta l Bus ines s Func tions

    Supplier and Contrac t D atabas e (S CD)

    The SC D is a database conta in ing deta ils o f the organization s suppl iers , together w ith deta i ls o f the produc ts and serv ices that they provide to the busines s ( e.g. e-m ai l s erv ic e, PC supply and ins tal la tion, S ervic e Des k) ,

    together w i th deta i ls o f the c ontrac ts. The SCD c ontains s uppl ier deta ils , a s um mary of eac h product/s ervic e (includ ing support arr angem ents ), in form ation on the ordering proc ess and, where appl ic able, c ontrac t

    deta i ls. Ideal ly the S CD should be conta ined w ith in the overa l l CM S.

    SLA Struc ture

    Multi-level SLA

    Service levelc ov er s a spec i fic s erv ic e, in re la tion to a s pec ific c us tom er group or bus ines s uni t (one for eac h s ervic e c ov er ed by the SLA)

    Customer level c overs a partic u lar cus tomer group or busines s un i t, regard less of the s erv ice be ing us ed

    Corporate level c ov er s a ll c us tom er group or bus ines s un it thr oughout the organization/c orporation

    Customer-based SLA C ov ers a l l the serv ices for an ind ividual cus tom er group

    Service-based SLAFor exam ple E-m ai l serv ic e

    Covers one s ervic e, for a ll the c ustom ers of that serv ice

    Serv ic e O riented Arc h itec ture ( SOA )

    A paradigm for organiz ing and uti l iz ing d is tributed capabil i ties that m ay be under the contro l o f d i fferent owners hip dom ains . It prov ides a un iform m eans to offer, d isc over, interac t w ith and us e c apabi l ities to

    produc e des i red effects cons is tent w i th m eas urable prec ondi tions and expec tations .

    Serv ice Faul t Analys isServ ice Fai lure Analys is (SFA) is a tec hnique designed to provide a s tructured approach to identi fy ing the under ly ing caus es of s erv ic e interruptions to the user.

    Serv ic e D esign Pac k age ( SDP)

    T he S er vic e Ac ceptance C ri teria .

    R eleas e and deploy ment p lans

    T he deta i led des ign of how the serv ice com ponents w il l be as s em bled and integrated in to a re leas e pac kage

    The defin i tion and des ign of each re leas e pack