ITEMS ANALYSIS ON THE SCORE OF THE ENGLISH SUMMATIVE … · 2019-08-03 · i ITEMS ANALYSIS ON THE...
Transcript of ITEMS ANALYSIS ON THE SCORE OF THE ENGLISH SUMMATIVE … · 2019-08-03 · i ITEMS ANALYSIS ON THE...
i
ITEMS ANALYSIS ON THE SCORE OF THE ENGLISH
SUMMATIVE TEST
(A Descriptive Study of the Tenth Grade Students of SMK N 3 Salatiga in
the Academic Year of 2013/2014)
A GRADUATING PAPER
Submitted to the Board of Examiners as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Degree of Sarjana Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris (S.Pd.I)
in the English Department of Education Faculty
SITI MUNADLIROH
NIM. 11310142
ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FACULTY
STATE INSTITUTE FOR ISLAMIC STUDIES (STAIN)
SALATIGA
2015
ii
iii
iv
v
MOTTO
“Intelligence is not the determinant of success, but hard work is the real determinant of
your success.”
~Alexander Graham Bell~
-
“No surrender term. Winners never give up, because people who give up would never win.”
~Ted Turner~
-
“Life is like to reach the bike, drive as fast as possible.”
~Albert Einstein~
vi
DEDICATION
This work is sincerely dedicated for:
1. My beloved parents, my father (Sujadi) and my mother (Siti alfiah) who
always pray, guide, motivate me to become better person.
2. My beloved sisters (Nurul Hikmah and Nana Farida) who fill my life with
love and affection.
3. My beloved uncle and aunt, my uncle (Yaseri) and my aunt (Sujiyem)
who motivate me directly and my big family who fill my life with love,
affection and pleasantness.
4. My closest friends at STAIN Salatiga who always motivate and help me.
Too many memories and impressions together with you and I can’t forget
you, friends.
vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Bismillahirrahmanirrahim,
In the name of Allah, the most gracious and merciful, the kings of universe
and space. Thank you to Allah because the writer could complete this graduating
paper as one of requirement to finished study in English Department faculty of States
Institute for Islamic Studies.
This graduating paper would not have been completed without support,
guidance and help from individual and institution. Therefore, I would like to express
special thank you to:
1. Mr. Dr. Rahmat Hariyadi, M.Pd as the Rector of State Institute for Islamic
Studies Salatiga.
2. Mrs. Rr. Dewi Wahyu Mustikasari, M.Pd as the head of English Department of
States Institute for Islamic Studies (STAIN) Salatiga and the consultant of this
graduating paper. Thank you for all of your suggestion, recommendation and
support for this graduating paper from the beginning until the end.
3. Mrs. Setia Rini, M.Pd as consultant who has educated, supported, directed and
given the writer advice, suggestion and recomendation for this graduating paper
from beginning until the end. Thank you for your patience and care.
4. All lecturers in English Department Faculty of STAIN Salatiga. Thank you for
all guidance, knowledge, support, and etc.
viii
ix
ABSTRACT
Munadliroh, Siti. 2014. “Items Analysis on the Students’ Score of the English
Summative Test (Descriptive Study of the Tenth Grade Students of SMK N 3
Salatiga in the Academic Year of 2013/2014)”. Graduating Paper.
Educational Faculty. English Department. State Institute for Islamic Studies
(STAIN). Consultant: Setia Rini, M. Pd
This research was aimed to give a description for the readers about an items
analysis on the students’ score of the English summative test. This research can be
used for as an input for the readers; especially for the English teachers, the
headmaster, and all people who are involved and responsible in developing good
quality of test. The objective of this research was to measure and find out the
difficulty level and discrimination index on items of English summative test score of
the tenth grade students at SMK N 3 Salatiga in the academic years of 2013/2014.
Type of this research was descriptive study. This research was compiled in
quantitative method. It was applied purposive sampling technique. The total number
of the sample was three classes which were 102 students. The data of this study was
taken from observation and documentation which used to obtain the school data like
students’ name and general information. The result of this research were as follows,
based on the data of difficulty index, there were 21 questions (42%) that placed in the
normal position that included to the criteria of moderate question. In the contrary,
there were 27 questions (54%) that included to the criteria of easy question and there
were 2 questions (4%) that included to the criteria of hard question. Based on the data
of discrimination index, there were 24 questions (42%) were in good criteria of
discrimination index. Then 17 questions (34%) were in satisfactory criteria of
discrimination index. In contrary, the writer found 9 questions (18%) items that were
in the poor criteria. It were rejected either due to the difficulty level or discrimination
index. It could be concluded that there were 9 questions that must be removed or
revised to be good questions.
Keywords: Descriptive study, Item Analysis, English summative test.
x
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE i
DECLARATION ii
ATTENTIVE COUNSELOR NOTES iii
PAGE OF CERTIFICATION iv
MOTTO v
DEDICATION vi
ACKNOWLEDGMENT vii
ABSTRACT ix
TABLE OF CONTENTS x
LIST OF TABLES, CHART AND FIGURE xiii
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
A. Background of Study 1
B. Problem Statements 6
C. Objectives of the Study 6
D. Benefits of Study 6
E. Scope Limitation of the Study 7
F. Definition of the Key Terms 7
G. Review of Previous Research 9
H. Research Organization 10
CHAPTER II THEORITICAL FRAMEWORK
A. Language Test 12
B. Test 13
1. Definition of Test 13
2. The Kinds of Test 14
xi
C. Summative Test 23
1. Definition of Summative Test 22
2. Purpose of Summative Test 23
3. Advantages of Summative Test 23
4. Assessment Aspect of Summative Test 24
D. The Characteristics of a Good Test 24
1. Validity 26
a. Content Validity 28
b. Construct Validity 29
c. Empirical Validity 30
2. Reliability 31
3. Practicality 32
E. Item Analysis 33
1. Item difficulty 34
2. Item Discrimination 34
F. English Curriculum 35
1. Concept of Curriculum 2013 35
2. Rational of Curriculum 2013 Development 36
CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY OF RESEARCH
A. Setting of The Research 37
B. Subject of Research 38
C. Type and Method of the Research 42
D. Technique of Collecting Data 43
E. Technique of Analyzing Data 45
CHAPTER IV DATA ANALYSIS
A. Analysis 49
1. Analysis of the Difficulty Index 49
xii
2. Analysis of the Discrimination Index 53
B. Interpetation of Data 60
C. Finding and Discussion 64
CHAPTER V CLOSURE
A. Conclusions 68
B. Suggestions 69
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CURRICULUM VITAE
APPENDICES
xiii
LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES
Table 3.1 List of X-O2 Students’ Scores of SMK N 3 Salatiga 39
Table 3.2 List of X-W1 Students’ Scores of SMK N 3 Salatiga 40
Table 3.3 List of X-TKR1 Students’ Scores of SMK N 3 Salatiga 41
Table 3.4 Classification of the Difficulty Index 46
Table 3.5 Classification of the Discrimination Index 48
Table 4.1 List of the Difficulty Index on the Test Items 51
Table 4.2 Classification of Discrimination Index 55
Table 4.3 List of Upper and Lower Group based on the Scores 56
Table 4.4 List of the Discrimination Index on the Test Items 58
Table 4.5 List of the Difficulty Index on the Test Items 60
Table 4 6 List of the Discrimination Index on the Test Items 62
Figure 4 1 Item Frequency for each Difficulty Index Range 65
Figure 4.2 Item Frequency for each Discrimination Index
Range 66
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. Background of Study
English is a tool of communication to get information and it can be
used in formal education as academic subject matter. In the global era,
English is increasingly needed because it is one of the international languages
mostly used in world.
English as an International language has an important role in any
sphere of activities to be used as a means of communication both written and
spoken, so English language becomes the first foreign language that should be
taught to English students for every level of education in Indonesia. English is
taught as a compulsory subject in elementary, junior and senior high schools,
and as a complementary subject in university.
The purpose of teaching English in Indonesia is to develop the
communication skills especially in oral and written skills (listening, speaking,
reading and writing). To reach the purpose of the instructional activities, the
teachers apply evaluation to measure how far the students understand about
the material.
In education, goals are identified on the basis of students and society’s
need. Based on this needs, educational programs are established so that
students can reach the goals. After the program has begun, information of
2
students’ behaviour is needed as to judge the success of the students in
reaching the goals. Evaluation must be done because education is not
automatically successful. The core of evaluation is then to evaluate the
success of students which is periodically gathered in terms of the objectives.
One of the most important aspects of teaching learning process is
evaluation. It contributes directly to the teaching and learning process used in
classroom instruction. According to Sudijono (1996: 13), the main focus of
classroom evaluation is the students and their learning process. To measure
the students’ competence in the learning process, the teachers need to hold an
evaluation. Evaluation plays an important role in teaching learning activities.
It is an integral part of instructional program.
The measurement of educational achievement is essential to effective
formal education. Formal education is a complex process, requiring a great
deal of time and money and cooperative efforts of many people. Effort must
be directed toward the attainment of specific goals, because education is not
automatically successful. Teachers, students, parents and school officials need
to know periodically how successful their efforts have been, so that they can
decide which practices to continue and which to change (Gronlund, 1982: 9).
Teachers are those who know the characteristics of their classes. Thus,
they are the best position to construct a test to measure their students’
achievement and it is not an easy job. Some teachers make a test carelessly.
The test that is made accordingly can help teacher increases the teaching-
3
learning process. High quality test can give information about how well the
students have comprehended the material, which has been taught by the
teacher. So, teaching learning process will be more effective without any
overlapping.
One of form to evaluate the students’ ability is test. Evaluation can be
done in the form of test. This test could be a teacher-made test or standardized
test. In the teacher-made test, the teachers who make the test should know and
master the principles and the steps that must be done in making the test. By
this knowledge the teachers will get a clear figure about the general
systematic framework of evaluation.
There are numerous types of test. There are placement test,
achievement test, proficiency test and aptitude test. The test which is usually
used by teacher to know how far students have mastered the lessons is the
achievement test. The achievement test is intended to establish how successful
individual students groups of students or the courses themselves have been
achieving objectives of language courses. Then here are two kinds of
achievement test: progress achievement test and final achievement test.
Progress achievements are those intended to measure the progress that
students are making and final achievement tests or summative tests are
intended to measure the students’ achievement at the end of a course of study
(Hughes, 1995: 10).
4
In order to measure accurately, the teachers should use a good test. It
is not an easy work for them to make it because there are some characteristics
or requirements that must be fulfilled. The characteristics of a good test
include validity, reliability, objectivity and practicality (Sudijono, 1996: 93).
Validity is the most important consideration in test evaluation. The
concept refers to the appropriateness, meaning and usefulness of the specific
inferences made from the score. Test validation is the process of accumulating
evidence to support such inference. The former types of validity are content,
criterion related, and construct (Tinambunan, 1988: 11).
Most of teachers applied test in the multiple choice form in the final
program of teaching learning process. According to Tinambunan (1988: 9),
the summative test is intended to show the standard which the students have
now reached in relation to other students at the same stage.
Item analysis is an important and necessary step in the preparation of
good multiple choice test. Because of this fact; it is suggested that every
classroom teacher who uses multiple choice test data should know something
of item analysis. How it is and what it means. Items analysis provides two
kinds of information on items, there are item difficulty and item
discrimination (Oller, 1979: 254).
In SMK N 3 Salatiga, English summative tests is settled as one of the
most important aspects that can be used as the tools of evaluation to measure
the students ability whether the students have achieved the learning target or
5
not. Since the English summative tests will become the main point of student
ability in English so this test will be very important to be analyzed. If the test
isn’t valid we can say that the test can’t use as the tools of measurement.
The writer focuses the research of the tenth grade students in this
school and focuses on the observation of the English summative tests. As we
know that tenth grade is the beginning class of senior high school where the
teacher can get the general and valid information about the students’ ability.
By knowing the valid information about the students’ ability might help the
teacher to find the suitable steps in treating students in class.
From the reason above the writer concludes that this research is very
important to be done because the English summative tests in SMK N 3
Salatiga is oriented to measure the students’ ability whether the target of
learning has been achieved or not. The teachers in this school also use the
result of the English summative tests in tenth grade as the standing point of
view in treating the students for the next level. If these purposes of this test
can’t give the valid information so the test is also not valid.
Based on the explanation above, it gives an inspiration to the writer to
conducts a research related to how to evaluate the items analysis of the
summative tests score. That is a research entitled “ITEMS ANALYSIS ON
THE SCORE OF THE ENGLISH SUMMATIVE TEST (A Descriptive
Study of the Tenth Grade Students of SMK N 3 Salatiga in the Academic
Year of 2013/2014)”.
6
B. Problem Statements
Based on the background described above, this research is aimed at
giving answers on how are the difficulty level and the discrimination index
on items of English summative test score of the tenth grade students at SMK
N 3 Salatiga in the academic years of 2013/2014?
C. Objectives of the Study
The general purpose of the study is to be able to know how the items
analysis on the students’ score of the English summative test at he tenth
grade students at SMK N 3 Salatiga. The specific objectives of this study as
able to measure and find out the difficulty level and discrimination index on
items of English summative test score of the tenth grade students at SMK N
3 Salatiga in academic years of 2013/2014.
D. Benefit of the Study
The result of this study is expected to give a description for the readers
about items analysis of test score toward the summative test. It can be used as
an input for the readers; especially for the English teachers, the headmaster,
and all people who are involved and responsible in developing good quality of
test. In other word, it is useful for all people to know the characteristics of a
good test and for the researcher as the basic to conduct further research.
7
E. Scope and Limitation of the Study
The discussion of the study will be focused on items analysis on the
students’ score of the English summative tests of the tenth grade students of
SMK N 3 Salatiga. According to Anthony (1983: 284), item analysis refers to
the process of collecting, summarizing, and using information about
individual test items especially information about pupil’s response to items.
According to Widdowson (2000: 60), item analysis usually provides two
kinds of information on items, they are:
1. Item facility (Item difficulty), which helps us decide if the test items are at
the right level for the target group.
2. Item discrimination, which allows us to see if the individual items are
providing information on candidates’ abilities consistent with that
provided by the other items on the test.
F. Definition of Key Terms
1. Validity
Validity is the most important consideration in test evaluation. The
concept refers to the appropriateness, meaning and usefulness of the
specific inferences made from the score. Test validation is the process of
accumulating evidence to support such inference. The former types of
validity (content, criterion related, and construct) are simply considered to
be convenient categories for accumulating evidence to support the validity
8
of an interpretation but the primary concern for classroom achievement
testing is content validity (Tinambunan, 1988: 11).
Validity is a standard or criterion that shows whether the instrument
is valid or not. A test is valid to the extent that it measures what it claims to
measure (Sukardi, 1987: 173).
2. Items Analysis
According to Anthony (1983: 284), item analysis refers to the
process of collecting, summarizing, and using information about individual
test items especially information about pupil’s response to items.
3. Test
Test is a particular type of assessment that typically consists of a set
questions administered during a fixed period of time under reasonably
comparable conditions for all students (Linn &Gronlund, 1995: 5).
According to Arikunto (2010: 226), to measure is there the object is
analyzed used a test. It’s used to measure the basic competence and
achievement. There are two types of achievement test used in school:
a. Test made by the teacher; that arranged by certain procedure, but it has
not been examined many times so its characteristics and strength has
not been known.
b. Standardized test; a test that usually has been available in a test
institution and has been guaranteed its effectiveness.
9
4. Summative Test
Summative test is final test which is executed after completing
program of teaching learning (Sudijono, 1996: 72).
The summative test is intended to show the standard which the
students have now reached in relation to other students at the same stage
(Tinambunan, 1988: 9). The condition for setting a summative test are that
it covers a much wide range of material than diagnostic test and relates to
be long-term rather than short-term objectives. This brings up problems of
sampling, since what has been learnt, for example in a year, cannot be
assessed in one day, yet the test must reflect the content of the whole
course, and the test must be able to determine the extent to which the
instructional objectives have achieved by the pupils and is used primarily
for assigning course grades of certifying pupil’s mastery of the extended
learning outcomes.
G. Review of Previous Research
In this graduating paper, the writer takes some reviews from other
thesis as a comparative in this research. The first journal is done by Hanik
Huamaizatul Husna and Fachrurrazy (2012) entitle “An Analysis of English
Summative Test for Sixth Grade Students in Three Public Elementary Schools
in UDANAWU District, Blitar Regency. In their thesis, they intended to find
out the quality of the English summative test for sixth grade students in three
10
public elementary schools in UDANAWU District, Blitar Regency. They
analyzed the quality of English summative test in terms of the test
construction, content validity, reliability, level of difficulty, level of
discrimination, and the effectiveness of distraction. It was compiled in
descriptive evaluation research.
The second is “Items Analysis of English Formative Test made by
English Teacher (A Study of Eleventh Grade Students at SMA N 1 Angkek)”.
It is written by Sari S. Octavia, a student of STKIP PGRI Sumatra Barat in the
academic year of 2012. She observed value of the daily tests that have been
achieved by eleventh grade students of SMA N 1 Angkek. Then she observed
how the results of the daily tests given by the English teachers.
H. Research Organization
The writer wants to arrange the graduating paper in order to the reader
can catch the content easily. It is divided into five chapters.
Chapter I is Introduction. It consists of background of study, problem
statements, objectives of the study, benefit of the study, limitation of the
study, definition of key terms, and review of previous research.
Chapter II is Theoretical Framework.This chapter is divided into three
sub chapters. The first sub chapter is talking about language test, which
describes about definition of test, the kind of the test and the characteristics of
a good test. The second of sub chapter is talking about validity, which
11
includes content validity, face validity, construct validity and empirical
validity. The last is talking about items validity.
Chapter III explains about methods of research that consist of setting
of the research, subject of the research, method of the research, procedure of
the research, technique of collecting data and technique of data analysis.
Chapter IV is Findings and Data Analysis. It consists of description of
data, analysis of data, Interpretation of data, finding, discussion, and result.
Chapter V is Closure. The writer states summary of the study includes
Conclusions and Suggestions related to the problem.
12
CHAPTER II
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
A. Language Test
Language testing is the practice and study of evaluating the
proficiency of an individual in using a particular language effectively (Brown,
2003: 42). The purpose of language test is to determine a person knowledge
and ability in the language and to discriminate that the persons’ ability from
that of others. Such ability may be of different kinds, achievement,
proficiency or aptitude. Tests, unlike scales, consist of specified tasks through
which language abilities are elicited. The term language test is used somewhat
more widely to include for example classroom testing for learning and
institutional examinations.
Actually there are many ways that use to evaluate the learning process.
One of the ways is test. Generally, test serves to motivate the learner and to
give the unity to portions of the material being studied at different times. It
can be device to prove the skills and abilities in learning.
From explanation above, the writer tries to develop the specific
explanations for this language test in order to easy to understand.
13
B. Test
1. Definition of Test
There are some definitions about test. Test is a particular type of
assessment that typically consists of a set questions administered during a
fixed period of time under reasonably comparable conditions for all
students (Linn & Gronlund, 1995: 5). According to Tinambunan (1988:
3), test is a set of questions, each of which has a correct answer, that
examinees usually answer orally or in writing. Furthermore, according to
Brown (2003: 3), test is a method of measuring a persons’ ability,
knowledge, or performance in a given domain. Additionally, according to
Griffin and Nix, tests are setting for structured observations and are
expected to provide an efficient source of many types of assessment
information. They also said that test is a formal, systematic procedure
used to gather information about students’ achievement or other cognitive
skill (Griffin and Nix, 1989: 5-6).
In order to know how well the result of learning process, teacher
should evaluate it. By evaluating, teachers can collect information or have
concept whether the teaching and learning activity has successes or not.
Gronlund said that “tests are used as a means to motivate students
to learn or review specific material” (Gronlund, 1982: 6). It means that
test is one motivation of students to learn or review material in their
school.
14
Furthermore Fernandes states that a test as a systematic procedure
for surveying a persons’ behavior and explaining it with the aid of a
numeric scale or a category system (Fernandes, 1984: 1).
In addition, according to Arikunto (2012: 67), test is instrument or
procedure which is used to know or measure a something in the situation
with the methods and rules determined.
Based on the definitions above, the writer concludes that the test
is the particular types of assessment to reinforce learning and to motivate
the students by giving a task or a set of tasks. Through the test, teachers
don’t only measure and motivate the students’ ability but also improve the
lesson in teaching learning process. In order to make a proper decision, the
teacher needs an accurate data. So a good instrument is needed.
2. The Kinds of Test
There are many types of test used to measure students’
achievement. The writer discusses about kinds of test based on two
experts’ opinions. First, According to Tinambunan, there are four types of
achievement test which are commonly used by teachers in the classroom:
15
1) Placement test
A placement test is designed to determine pupil
performance in the beginning of instruction.
2) Formative test
Formative test is intended to monitor learning progress
during the instruction and to provide continuous feedback to both
pupil and teacher concerning learning successes and failures. It is
used at the end of a unit in the course book or after a lesson
designed. The result of this test will give the students immediate
feedback.
3) Diagnostic test
Diagnostic test is intended to diagnose learning difficulties
during instruction. The main aim of diagnostic test is to determine
the causes of learning difficulties and then to formulate a plan for
remedial action.
4) Summative test
According to Sudijono, summative test is final test which is
executed after completing program of teaching learning (Sudijono,
1998: 7-9).
In addition, according to Tambunan (1988: 9), summative
test is intended to show the standard which the students have now
reached in relation to other students at the same stage.
16
Second, according to Brown, tests are divided into three
categories there are achievement test, aptitude test, and proficiency
test. Here, the writer likes to explain more about kind of tests.
1) Achievement test
Achievement test was designed to measure a variety of
learning outcomes, such as knowledge of specific facts, ability to
apply facts and principles (Tinambunan, 1988: 28). A classroom
tests is made by a teacher for his/her students and may or may not
be used again.
According to Gronlund, an achievement test is a systematic
procedure for determining the amount a student has learned.
Although the emphasis is on measuring learning outcomes, it
should not be implied that testing is to be done only at the end of
instruction (Gronlund, 1982: 1).
While, Sudijonos’ opinion (1996: 73), achievement test is
test which is used to reveal the level of attainment or learning
achievement. It is usually a formal examination given at the end of
the school year or at the end of the course, the achievement test
may be written and administered by ministries of education,
officially examining boards, or by members of teaching institution.
17
According to Hughes, achievement tests are directly related
to language course, their purpose being to establish how successful
individual students, group of students, or the courses themselves
have been in achieving objectives. They are two kind of test: final
achievement tests and progress achievement tests.
a) Final achievement tests are those administered at the end of a
course of study.
b) Progress achievement tests, as their name suggests, are
intended to measure the progress that students are making
(Hughes, 2003: 13).
Furthermore, Brown (2003: 47) said that an achievement
test related directly to classroom lessons, units, or even a total
curriculum. Achievement test are limited to particular material
covered in a curriculum within a particular time frame, and are
offered after a course has covered the objectives in question. Then
achievement tests are often summative because they are
administered at the end of a unit or term of study.
In addition, another opinion, an achievement test is
designed to indicate degree of students’ success in some past
learning activities (Tinambunan, 1998: 9). This purpose of
achievement test is obviously different from the purpose of
18
aptitude test, where the aptitude test is designed to predict success
in some future learning activities.
In order to have a good achievement test form, a test maker
should consider that achievement test much be constructed well by
paying attention to some following basic principles (Gronlund
1988: 303). They are:
a) Achievement tests should measure clearly defined learning
outcomes that are in harmony with the instructional objectives.
b) Achievement tests should measure an adequate sample of the
learning outcomes and subjects matter content included in
instructions.
c) Achievement tests should include of the tests items, which are
most appropriate for measuring the desired learning outcomes.
d) Achievement tests should be designed to fit the particular uses
to be made of the results.
e) Achievement tests should be made as reliable as possible and
should then be interpreted with caution.
f) Achievement tests should be used to improve student learning.
The content of tests based on the course objectives gives a
number of advantages. The first, it compels course designers to be
explicit about objectives. The second, it makes possible for
performances on the test to show just how far students have
19
achieved the instructional objectives. Consequently, the course
designer or teacher should construct a syllabus based on the
instructional objectives and should select books and materials
which are consistent with the course objectives.
Based on the explanation above, the writer concludes that
achievement tests should support and reinforce other aspects of the
instructional process. May they can aid both the teacher and
student in assessing learning readiness.
2) Aptitude test
The second type of test is the aptitude tests. Aptitude tests
are designed to predict, before beginning language study, a
subjects’ capability of acquiring the language (Merry and Sydney,
1993: 7). By looking at “predict” term, it can be recognized that
these tests give some clues as to whether, how well and how
quickly a person is likely to success in learning.
According to Sudijono (1996: 73), the aptitude test is test
which is executed that aim to reveal a basic competence or special
aptitude that students have.
Beside it, Brown states, a language aptitude test is designed
to measures a persons’ capacity or general ability to learn a foreign
language and to be successful in that undertaking. Aptitude tests
20
are considered to be independent of a particular language (Brown,
2001: 391).
Fundamentally, aptitude tests have different features in
nature from achievement test, which has been discussed
previously. Aptitude tests are primarily designed to predict success
in some future learning activities, whereas achievement tests are
designed to indicate degree of success in some past learning
activity (Tinambunan, 1998: 7). From a comparison above, it can
be comprehended that a distinction founded between these two
tests is made in term of the use of the results. It is rather than the
qualities of the tests themselves.
3) Proficiency test
The third type of test is proficiency test. This test is used to
know the proficiency of test-takers. It is hoped after giving this test
the test-taker will know their ability in their ability in language
especially in English language.
According to Hughes (2003: 11), proficiency tests are
designed to measure people’s ability in a language. The content of
proficiency test is based on a specification have to be able to do in
the language in order to be considered proficient.
While Harmer (2001: 321), said that the proficiency tests
give a general picture of students’ knowledge and ability (rather
21
than measures progress). They are frequently used as stages people
have to reach if they want to be admitted to a foreign university,
get a job, or obtain some kind of certificate. Proficiency tests have
a profound backwash effect since, where they are external exams,
students obviously want to pass them, and teachers’ reputation
sometimes depend (probably unfairly) upon how many of them
succeed.
Appropriate the writers’ experience during the learning,
this test usually consists of the standardized multiple choice items
in structure, reading comprehension, listening comprehension, and
sometimes on writing.
Based on the explanations about the kind of tests above, the writer
concludes that generally test is a systematic and objective procedure to
find out the knowledge and ability of what have been learned from
someone.
C. Summative Test
According to Brown, Summative test has clearly related to summative
assessment. Summative assessment aims to measure or summarize what a
student grasped and typically occurs at the end of a course or unit of
instruction. A summation of what a student has learned implies looking back
22
and taking stock of how well that student has accomplished objectives. But it
does not necessarily point the way to future progress. Final exams in a course
and general exams are examples of summative assessment (Brown, 2003: 06).
In this part, the writer discusses more about summative test as a follow:
1. Definitions of Summative Test
According to Sudijono, summative test is final test which is
executed after completing program of teaching learning (Sudijono, 1998:
7-9).
In addition, according to Tambunan, summative test is intended to
shows the standard which the students have now reached in relation to
other students at the same stage (Tinambunan, 1988: 9)
2. Purpose of Summative Test
The purpose of summative test is establishes a success learning,
which its result as a substances to fulfill a students’ grade report and
preferment class. So that it is not used to improve a teaching-learning
process, because of all the materials have been extended. If the student
failed, he or she reputed that not pass in a lesson which involved in the
learning (Sutomo, 1985: 20).
3. Advantages of Summative Test
According to Arikunto (2008: 39), there are important advantages
of summative test, they are:
a. To determine the point of students.
23
b. To be able to know students’ ability in following the next of teaching
programs.
c. To fulfill the progress learning notes that it can be useful to students’
parent, consultant, and mentor in the school.
The main purpose of summative test is determines the point which
symbolize a student success after passing the learning process at certain
time. So that the teacher can determines a student position in the class. It
related to the students condition in following a teaching programs
(Silverus, 1991: 10).
4. Assessment aspect of summative test
According to Sutomo (1985: 20) aspect which is assessed in
summative assessment is all of ability aspect the learning result during the
teaching programs. They are knowledge aspect (cognitive), skill
(psychomotor), and behavior (affective).
Based on the statement above, the writer concludes that the
condition for setting a summative test are that it covers a much wide range
of material than diagnostic test and relates to be long-term rather than
short-term objectives. This brings up problems of sampling, since what
has been learned, for example in a year, cannot be assessed in one day, yet
the test must reflect the content of the whole course, and the test must be
able to determine the extent to which the instructional objectives have
24
achieved by the pupils and is used primarily for assigning course grades of
certifying pupil’s mastery of the extended learning outcomes.
D. The Characteristics of a Good Tests
A test which is good the measuring instrument must meet the test
requirements, namely to have validity, reliability, and usability (Arikunto,
2009: 58). First character of a good test is needed to have validity. Validity
refers to the adequacy and appropriateness of the interpretation made from
tests, with regard to a particular use. An information data can be said is valid
in accordance with actual circumstances. The second characteristic of a good
test is needed to have reliability. A test should be reliable as a measuring
instrument. Reliability is the consistency of assessment results (Linn and
Gronlund, 1995: 48).
If the teachers obtain quite similar scores when the same test
procedure is used with the same students on two different occasions, they can
conclude that their results have a high degree of reliability from one occasion
to another. Similarity, if different teachers independently rate student
performances on the same test task and obtain similar ratings, they can
conclude that tests can be said reliable. If it gives results that remain when a
test is practiced to students for many times, it also conclude that tests can be
said reliable (Arikunto, 2009: 90).
25
The third characteristic of a good test is usability in the preparation of
a new test. The term usability, then, refers only to the practically of the
procedure and says nothing about the other qualities percent (Linn and
Gronlund, 1995: 49). The teacher must keep in mind a number of a very
practical consideration which involves economy, ease of administration,
scoring and interpretation of result. How long the administering and scoring
of test will take, choosing a short test rather longer test.
In the writer’s opinion, the practically of a test is important in order
that test materials can be administered well. It must be determined in term of
materials, time, and effort that it requires.
1. Validity
Based on the previous explanation, the writer mentions that one of
a good test characteristic is validity. Test validity is the most critical factor
to be judged in the total of foreign language testing. Validity is the extent
to which a test measures what it is intended to measure (William, 1990:
183). It means validity refers to extent to which the results of an
evaluation procedure serve the particular uses for which they are intended.
For example, if a test is designed to measure oral comprehension, it should
not attend to measure another skill such as reading comprehension. If a
test is intended to measure a persons’ ability to speak the language, it is
valid only if speaking skills and not writing ability are the specific
measurable skill emphasize.
26
Traditionally, validity has been defined as “the degree to which a
test measures what it claims or purports to be measuring”. According to
Gronlund, the meaning of validity has typically been defined for the
testing profession by a set of standards. In the most recent edition of the
standards, validity has been described as follows: “validity is the most
important consideration in test evaluation. The concept refers to the
appropriateness, meaningfulness, and usefulness of the specific inferences
made from the scores. Test validation is the process of accumulating
evidence to support such inferences. A variety of inferences may be made
from scores produced by a given test, and there are many ways of
accumulating evidence to support any particular inference. Validity,
however, is a unitary concept. Although evidence may be accumulated in
many ways, validity always refers to the degree to which that evidence
support the inferences that are made from the scores. The inferences
regarding specific uses of a test are validated, not the test itself (Gronlund,
1993: 159)”.
The other hand, Tinambunan said that validity refers to the extent
to the results of an evaluation procedure serve the particular uses for
which they are intended. Thus, the validity of a test is extent to which the
test measures what is intended to measure (Tinambunan, 1988: 11).
According to Gronlund, validity refers to the appropriateness of
the interpretations of test results. The concept of validity, as used in
27
testing, can be clarified further by noting the following general points;
validity refers to the interpretation of test results (not to the test itself),
validity is inferred from available evidence (not measured), validity is
specific to a particular use (selection, placement, evaluation of learning,
and so forth), validity is expressed by degree, for example; high,
moderate, or low (Gronlund, 1982: 126).
In every language, we say that something is valid if it is sound and
meaningful, or well grounded on principles or evidence. For example, we
speak of a valid theory, a valid argument, or valid reason. Validity is the
process of gathering and evaluating validity evidence. Both the test
developer and the test user may play a role in the validation of a test for a
specific purpose (Ronald and Mark, 1988: 175).
In other opinion came from Fernandes, an important characteristic
of a test is its validity. The validity can be viewed as the accuracy of
specified in references made from scores (Fernandes, 1986: 6).
From the definition above, the writer concludes that these are no
differences in the essence of validity, there are only different in the
terminology, such as extent and degree and worth, while all of them intend
to measure the purpose to measure.
There are three types of validity namely content validity, construct
validity, and empirical validity. They are:
28
a. Content Validity
The principal validity for achievement tests is content validity,
sometimes called content relevance. Content validity talks about
content of test. Febru and Erna said, “Content validity is concerned
with the extent to which the test is representative of a defined body of
content consisting of topics and processes (Febru and Erna, 2011:
167). Therefore, the test should reflect instructional objectives or
subject matters. But it is not expected that every knowledge or skills
will always appear in the test; there may simply be too many things for
all of them to appear in a single test.
According to Hughes a test is said to have content validity if its
contents constitute a representative sample of the language skills,
structure, etc (Hughes, 2003: 11).
The content validity is concerned with how the test measures
the subject matter and behavior under consideration. The test items
must be a representative sample of the domain of possible content or
behavior. Content validity is the most appropriate method for
evaluating the validity of achievement tests (Fernandes, 1984: 43).
29
b. Construct Validity
In construct validity, we have to measure the difficulties of the
students toward the test has to be qualified. Terminologically,
according to Anas, achievement test learning can be stated as a test
which it is have a construct validity, if achievement test learning is
exactly reflect a construction in psychology theory with consideration
from composition aspect, design or invention (Sudijono, 1996: 166).
According to Gronlund, construct validity is applicable to both
norm-referenced and criterion-referenced tests, evidence in the latter
case would, it consists of necessity and it can be less dependent on
statistical measures requiring score variability (Gronlund, 1982: 131).
Bachman and Palmer said that construct validity is the on-
going process of demonstrating that a particular interpretation of test
scores is justified and involves, essentially, building a logical case in
support of a particular interpretation and providing evidence justifying
interpretation (Bachman and Palmer, 1984:520).
Beside that Hughes and Porter said that construct validity has
focuses attention on the desirability of basing test construction on an
explicitly recognized theoretical foundation. A possible danger in the
application of construct validity is that may open the way for
subjective, unverified assertions about test validity (Hughes and
Porter, 1983: 143).
30
c. Empirical Validity
Empirical validity is accuracy measure which is basing on
analysis result that has empirical character (Sudijono, 1996: 167).
According to Charles, empirical validity depends on empirical
and statistical evidence as to whether students’ marks on the test are
similar to their marks on other appropriate measures of their ability,
such as their scores on other tests, their self assessments or their
teachers’ rating of their ability (Anderson, 1995: 171).
In order to know whether a test has empirical validity or not, it
can be traced from ways, first is concurrent validity and second is
prediction validity. Concurrent validity applies if data on the two
measures (test and criterion) are collected at or about the same time.
Predictive validity applies if there is an intervening period (e.g., three
or six month) between the time of testing and the collection of data on
criterion. Operationally, this time of criterion data collection is the
distinction between the two types of criterion validity. Specifically, the
question of concurrent validity is whether or not the test scores
estimate a specified present performance; that’s of predictive validity
is whether or not the test scores predict a specified future performance
(Sudijono, 1996: 168).
31
In the writers’ opinion, validity of a test is important to know a
test whether it has a good quality in testing someone’s capability or
not.
2. Reliability
A test should be reliable as a measuring instrument. A test cannot
measure anything well unless it measures consistently. According to
Anderson (1995: 187), a test cannot be valid unless it is reliable. If the test
administered to the same students on the different occasion and there is no
difference to the results. It can be said that the test is reliable.
3. Practicality
The third, characteristics of a good test is practicality or usability
in the preparation of a new test. The teacher must keep in mind a number
of very practical considerations which involves economy, ease of
administration, scoring and interpretation of result. Economy means the
test is not costly. The teachers must take into account the cost per copy,
how many scores will be needed, (for the more personnel who must be
involved in giving and scoring a test, the more costly the process
becomes). How long the administering and scoring of it will take,
choosing a short test rather than longer one. Ease of administration and
scoring means that the test administrator can perform his task quickly and
efficiently. We must also consider the ease with which the test can be
administered.
32
According to Heaton (1988: 161), the final point concerns the
presentation of the test paper itself, where possible, it should be printed or
type written and appear neat, tidy and aesthetically pleasing. Nothing is
worse and more disconcerting to the testiest than untidy test paper, full of
miss spellings, omissions and corrections. If it happens, it will be easy for
the students or testiest easy to interpret the test items.
Besides having a good criteria, the other characteristics of the test
that’s more important and specific is the quality of the test items. To know
the quality of the test items, teachers should use a method called item
analysis.
E. Item Analysis
There are several meanings of what item analysis. According to
Anthony (1983: 284), item analysis refers to the process of collecting,
summarizing, and using information about individual test items especially
information about pupil’s response to items.
Item analysis is an important and necessary step in the preparation of
good multiple choice test. Because of this fact; it is suggested that every
classroom teacher who uses multiple choice test data should know something
of item analysis. How it is and what it means (Oller, 1979: 254).
For the teacher made test, the followings are the important uses of
item analysis: determining whether an item functions as teacher intended, feed
33
back to students about their performance and as a basis for class discussion,
feedback about pupil difficulties, and area for curriculum improvement,
revising the item and improving item writing skill.
According to Widdowson (2000: 60), item analysis usually provides
two kinds of information on items, they are:
1. Item Difficulty (Item Facility)
Item facility, which helps us decide if the test items are at the right
level for the target group. Item facility expresses the proportion of the
people taking the test who got a given item right. According to Arikunto
(1995: 211), item facility refers to item difficulty. Item difficulty is
sometimes used to express similar information, in this case the proportion
that got an item wrong. Where the test purpose is to make distinctions
between candidates, to spread them out in terms of their performance on
the test, the items should be neither too easy nor too difficult. Good test is
items which not too easy or not too difficult. If the items are too easy, then
people with differing levels of ability or knowledge will all get them right,
and the differences in ability or knowledge will not revealed by the item.
Similarly if the items are too hard, then able and less able candidates alike
will get them wrong and the item will not help us in distinguishing
between them.
34
2. Item Discrimination
According to Arikunto (1995: 215), analysis of item discrimination
addresses a different target: consistency of performance by candidates
across items. The usual method for calculating item discrimination
involves comparing performance on each item by different groups of test
takers: those who have done relatively poorly. For example, as items get
harder, we would expect those who do best on the vest overall to be ones
who in the main get they right. Poor item discrimination indices are signal
that an item deserves revision.
If there are a lot of items with problems of discrimination, the
information coming out of the test is confusing, as it means that some
items are suggesting certain candidates that relatively better, while order
individuals are better, no clear picture of the candidates’ abilities emerges
from the test. (The scores, in other words, are misleading and not reliable
indicators of the underlying abilities of the candidates) such a test will
need considerable revision (Arikunto, 1995: 216).
F. English Curriculum
The writer would explain about English Curriculum 2013. Based on
module of implementation curriculum 2013 coaching (2014: 2), the
classification is the following bellow:
35
1. Concept of Curriculum 2013
Curriculum is one of element which gives contribution to construct
the students’ potential. It is developed based on the competence which is
needed as an instrument. It aims to direct the students to be able to:
a. Quality human who capable and proactive to the God; human who
have good character, skillful human, creative human, and powerful
human.
b. National who democratic and responsibility.
2. Rational of Curriculum 2013 Development
Developing of curriculum 2013 is advance step the curriculum
based on competence which is pioneered in year of 2004. It is advance
step the KTSP (2006) curriculum which include of cognitive competence,
affective competence, and skill competence.
36
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
I. Setting of the Research
This research was conducted in SMK N 3 Salatiga which is located in
Jl. Ja’far Shodiq Rt. 01 Rw. 03 Phone/Fax (0298) 7103119 Salatiga 50744.
The subject of this research was the tenth grade students of SMK N 3 Salatiga
in academic year of 2013/2014.
The existence of SMK N 3 Salatiga has long be expected by
communities especially Salatiga. It was to address the needs of diverse and
quality education. May 21th,
2007, it poured on decree of competence program
provider No. 420.5/1510 Head of the Salatiga. The competence program
opened; Mechatronic Technique, Welding technique, Ototronic Technique,
and Agribusiness & Horticulture.
In the face of increasingly fierce competition with public schools, the
management SMK N 3 Salatiga must create educational programs with the
aim to improve services to the stakeholders.
SMK N 3 Salatiga committed to education and training as the
fulfillment of the needs of the labor market by establishing a human resource
noble, superior, cultured, as well as independent and forward-looking.
37
J. Subject of the Research
In this research, the writer chose SMK N 3 Salatiga as object of the
study especially the tenth grade students. The tenth grade students consist of
twelve classes, but the writer took three classes, they are X-W1, X-O2, and X-
TKR1. The numbers of the participants are X-W1 (33 students, all of them are
boys), X-O2 (37 students, all of them are boys), and X-TKR1 (32 students, all
of them are boys). Their native language is Bahasa Indonesia. The average
age of the participants was 16 years old. They have English lesson at least one
meeting in a week which one hour lesson is 45 minutes.
a. Population
According to Arikunto (2010: 173), “population is all respondents
of the research subject”. The population of this research was the tenth
grade students of SMK N 3 Salatiga in the academic year of 2013/ 2014.
They are all of tenth grade students of SMK N 3 Salatiga.
b. Sample and Sampling Technique
Sample is part of the representative of population that is observed
(Arikunto, 2010: 174). From the total population of tenth grade students,
the writer took X-W1, X-O2, and X-TKR1 classes as the sample of this
research. It consists of 102 students.
In this research the writer used purposive sampling. According to
Ary, Jacobs and Sorensen (2006: 156), purposive sampling also referred to
as judgment sampling. Sample elements judged to be typical, or
38
representative, are chosen from the population. The assumption is that
errors of judgment in the selection will counterbalance one another.
The writer used this sampling technique because of a reason or
purpose in choosing that class as the sample. It was that these classes have
some categories based on the students’ ability in English lesson. They are
X-O2 (as excellent class), X-W1 (as moderate class) and X-TKR1 (as low
class).
These are the data of X-O2, X-W1 and X-TKR1 students’ English
scores are used as source of the research could be drawn as follows:
TABLE 3.1
List of X-O2 Students’ Scores of SMK N 3 Salatiga in
Academic Year of 2013/2014
NO NAME
QUESTION TOTAL
SCORE
(100) TRUE FALSE
1 Muhammad Purwanto 27 23 54
2 Achmad Rifa`i 44 6 88
3 Agus Widodo 41 9 82
4 Ahmad Khoirudin 39 11 78
5 Akhmad Khoirul Rizal 23 27 46
6 Akhsin Mushobir M. F. 49 1 98
7 Andre Nur Hidayat F. 47 3 94
8 Angga Zulianto 37 13 74
9 Antoni Ivan Mustofa 30 20 60
10 Anugrah Gustiantoko 29 21 58
11 Apri Khoiril 39 11 78
12 Aprinanda Bagus Nugroho 24 26 48
13 Bagas Fatkhur Rohman 46 4 92
14 Bagas Pebri Saputra 36 14 72
39
15 Basyir Chohim 19 31 38
16 Eko Sutomo 48 2 96
17 Enriko Adyangga P. P. 46 4 92
18 Farchan Hidayat 22 28 44
19 Fatkur Krisbiawan 47 3 94
20 fatkurrohman effendi 39 11 78
21 Galih Prasojo 20 30 40
22 Gandung Krismono 40 10 80
23 Kris Bagus Wibisono 39 11 78
24 Kristiyo Dwi Saputro 23 27 46
25 Kustrianto 45 5 90
26 Muhamad Khoirul Ihfan 32 18 64
27 Muhamat Andi Setiawan 36 14 72
28 Muhammad Ariffudin 20 30 40
29 Muhammad Dicky Alfian 39 11 78
30 Muhammad Roufurrohim 32 18 64
31 Muhammad Syafi'i 41 9 82
32 Rio Dhani Pratama 32 18 64
33 Suseno Sektiawan 24 26 48
34 Ulil Albab 47 3 94
35 Wahid Muhamad Wildan S 32 18 64
36 Wahyu Subur Dewantara 41 9 82
37 Yoga Adi Pradana 41 9 82
TABLE 3.2
List of X-W1 Students’ Scores of SMK N 3 Salatiga in
Academic Year of 2013/2014
NO NAME
QUESTION TOTAL
SCORE
(100) TRUE FALSE
1 Aan Istiyanto 30 20 60
2 Agung Saputro 47 3 94
3 Alviangga Eka Pratama 40 10 80
4 Amriyadi Wijaya 30 20 60
5 Andri Eka Saputra 40 10 80
6 Bagus Febriyan 37 13 74
7 Davitson Ariyadi 47 3 94
40
8 Dimas alfi Ari Yanto 45 5 90
9 Eka Priyanto 24 26 48
10 Eko Prihadi 49 1 98
11 Fajar Subkhi 36 14 72
12 Hasnul Wahyudin 40 10 80
13 Ivan Widya Pratama 35 15 70
14 Joko Heriyanto 25 25 50
15 Kornia Husada Kholbi 49 1 98
16 Krido Utomo 27 23 54
17 Manggala Oktavia Saputra 40 10 80
18 Muchamad Ubaid 49 1 98
19 Muhamad Rizal Faqtayana 35 15 70
20 Muhammad Amarul S. Q. 49 1 98
21 Muhammad Rendy T. 17 33 34
22 Muhammad Wildan Arif 50 0 100
23 Panji Eka Septiaji 35 15 70
24 Rafiadi 50 0 100
25 Rifaldi Bagus Nurtiyono 42 8 84
26 Satria Andre Parastika 25 25 50
27 Sidik Parwanto 26 24 52
28 Sofyan Yuliyanto 26 24 52
29 Sri Widodo Sambadagni 35 15 70
30 Toni Setiawan 27 23 54
31 Tri Fajar Nurohim 35 15 70
32 Triyanto Adi Sasongko 8 42 16
33 Yudhi Prasetya 18 32 36
TABLE 3.3
List of X-TKR1 Students’ Scores of SMK N 3 Salatiga in
Academic Year of 2013/2014
NO NAME
QUESTION TOTAL
SCORE
(100) TRUE FALSE
1 Adi Okta Ariyanto 49 1 98
2 Ainun Maulana Achsan 42 8 84
3 Al Farisi Imron 33 17 66
4 Anang Makruf 33 17 66
41
5 Bagas Daryanto 27 23 54
6 Bagus Muslimin 42 8 84
7 Dandi Setyawan 25 25 50
8 Dian Andi Permana 41 9 82
9 Duwi Witantoro 42 8 84
10 Dwi Febriyanto 42 8 84
11 Fiki Maulana Huda 27 23 54
12 Galih Susilo 49 1 98
13 Hernanda Banu Arafik 34 16 68
14 Ichsan Dwi Putra Nugraha 19 31 38
15 Imam Rosyadi 33 17 66
16 Jay Gillang Pratama 26 24 52
17 Kukuh Dwi Usodo 49 1 98
18 M. Maftukin 26 24 52
19 M. Ridwan Ruba`i 20 30 40
20 Muhammad Khoirul Umam 35 15 70
21 Muhamat Taufik 20 30 40
22 Muhammad Abdul Khamid 41 9 82
23 Muhammad Alvan Sakti 50 0 100
24 Muhammad Syukron A. M. 35 15 70
25 Muhammad Tri Yulianto 49 1 98
26 Mustaqim Mashud 49 1 98
27 Raditya Dhani Pradipta 27 23 54
28 Rifky Faizal Asqalani 44 6 88
29 Satriya Eka Nugroho 41 9 82
30 Wahyu Ahmad Syabani 39 11 78
31 Wandha Perdana Setyawan 20 30 40
32 Waskito Yogi Noviyanto 49 1 98
Source: SMK N 3 Salatiga, 2014
K. Type and Method of the Research
Type of research this research was descriptive study. According to
Stephen and Michael (1982: 46), descriptive study is used in the literal sense
of describing situations events. It is the accumulation of data base that is
solely descriptive. The purpose of this approach is to describe systematically
42
the facts and characteristics of a given population or area of interest, factually
and accurately.
In this research, the writer described about items analysis on the score
of the English summative tests of the tenth grade students of SMK N 3
Salatiga in the academic year of 2013/2014.
The quantitative method was applied in this study. According to
Lodico (2006: 13), quantitative methods are those which focus on numbers
and frequencies rather than on meaning and experience. Quantitative methods
(e.g. experiments, questionnaires and psychometric test) provide information
which is easy to analyze statistically and fairly reliable. In quantitative
method, the researcher focuses on collecting the data about the statistical
inferences. In addition, quantitative methodology assumes the necessity,
desirability, and even the possibility of applying some underlying empirical
standard to social phenomena (Quinn, 1978: 212).
L. Technique of Collecting Data
According to Muslich (2012: 40) research techniques consists of:
a. Observation
Observation is written note about what is seen, heard, and
experienced in collecting data and reflection toward qualitative data.
Observation is used to get the certain target which is observed. (Sam’s,
2010: 93)
43
The writer visited the school, asked for the tests results
(summative test) of English Subject and asked for the question sheet of
English Subject to be analyzed. The writer interviewed with the English
teacher of the tenth grade students of SMK N 3 Salatiga.
b. Documentation
According to Arikunto (2010: 274), documentation is an activity
to look for variable like notes, transcribes, books, newspapers, magazine,
etc. In this method, writer provided a check- list to look for the variable
that had been decided. Whether the wanted variable was rise, then the
writer gave a check (√) in the check- list form.
Documentation means collected the files or data of related
information including the result of tenth grade student’s examination in
even semester. There are two instruments used in this research, they are
English Summative test and English syllabus. The writer came to school,
ask for English summative tests of the tenth grade students of SMK N 3
Salatiga. Then, the writer collected the data about English syllabus,
students’ data profile, students’ English score and the general information
of SMK N 3 Salatiga.
44
M. Technique of Analyzing Data
The writer conducts Items Analysis on the Score of the English
Summative Test (Descriptive Study of the Tenth Grade Students of SMK N 3
Salatiga in Academic Year of 2013/2014. According to Stephen and Michael
(1982: 46), descriptive study is used in the literal sense of describing
situations events. It is the accumulation of data base that is solely descriptive.
The purpose of this approach is to describe systematically the facts and
characteristics of a given population or area of interest, factually and
accurately. In this study, the writer described all of the data and analyzed to
get the result and conclusions.
In analyzing data, the writer uses quantitative approach. Quantitative
approach is summarizing data using numbers. Hypotheses and methods of
data collection are created before the research begins (Lodico, 2006: 6). In
this research, the writer needs to identify, classify, and interpret the data.
Based on the information type that needed of this research, the writer
focuses on collecting the data about the statistical inferences in this research.
The English summative test was consisted of 50 items. It was developed from
the syllabus of curriculum 2013.
Items analysis provides two kinds of information on items, there are
item difficulty and item discrimination. First, the writer measures the
difficulty level that exists in items of the English summative test. According
to Arikunto (1995: 212), number which is indicates the items that difficult or
45
easy called difficulty index. Number of difficulty index between 0.00 until 1.0.
It is shows the standard of test difficulty. Test with the difficulty index 0.0
show that the test is too hard, in opposite index 1.0 show that the test is too
easy.
0.0 1.0
Hard Easy
To measure the difficulty index, the writer used the formula bellow:
P = Difficulty Index.
B = Total students that answered correct.
JS = Total all of students.
46
The result would be compared to the classification of difficulty index.
According to Daryanto (1999: 182), the difficulty index is classified as the
criteria bellow:
Table 3.4
Classification of the Difficulty Index
Achievement Criteria
0.00 ─ 0.30 Hard Question
0.30 ─ 0.70 Moderate Question
0.70 ─ 1.00 Easy Question
Second, the writer measures the discrimination index. According to
Arikunto (1995: 215), discrimination index is ability of item to discriminate
between high students and low students ability. Number which is show the
discrimination index called difficulty index. It at range 0.00 until 1.00. In
contradiction, the difficulty index not identifies a negative (-) sign and the
discrimination index identifies negative (-) sign.
-1.00 0.00 + 1.00
Discrimination index Discrimination index Discrimination index
Negative Low High/Positive
Test item was not good when the item which is answered correctly by the
upper student or lower student because it haven’t discrimination index. Such
if the upper and lower group answered correctly or false together, the point
46
was same. That item has point D 0.00 because it have not discrimination
index. To measure the discrimination index, the writer used the formula
bellow:
-
= PA – PB
D = Discrimination index
J = Total students
JA = Total of upper group
JB = Total of lower group
BA = Total of upper group who answered correctly
BB = Total of lower group who answered correctly
PA =
= Proportion the total of upper group who answered correctly
(P as the discrimination index).
PA =
= Proportion the total of lower group who answered correctly.
According to Daryanto (1999: 189), good item is item that distinguish
between high students and low students. It could be seen from whether able or
unable answered the test. The test items were poor if the test items could be
answered by the lower group that the correct answer from the upper group.
47
The result would be compared to the classification of discrimination
index. According to Arikunto (1995: 223), the discrimination index is
classified as the criteria bellow:
Table 3.5
Classification of the Discrimination Index
Achievement Criteria
0.70 ─ 1.00 Excellent
0.40 ─ 0.70 Good
0.20 ─ 0.40 Satisfactory
0.00 ─ 0.20 Poor
Moreover classification, According to Aggrawal (1986), items having
negative discrimination is rejected. Items having discrimination index
above 02.00 are ordinarily regarded satisfactory for use in most tests
of academic achievement.
48
CHAPTER IV
DATA ANALYSIS
This chapter focuses on analyzing the collected data. The writer gives the
details of the findings. This chapter is likely the main discussion of the research
conducted. It displays the finding of the collected data since in the beginning until
the end of the research.
A. Analysis
In this study, the writer provided the whole data analyses of this
research which are explained in the description below:
1. Analysis of the Difficulty Index
First, the writer measures the difficulty level that exists in items of
the English summative test. According to Arikunto (1995: 212), number
which is indicates the items that difficult or easy called difficulty index.
Number of difficulty index between 0.00 until 1.0. It is shows the standard
of test difficulty. Test with the difficulty index 0.0 show that the test is too
hard, in opposite index 1.0 show that the test is too easy.
1.0 1.0
Hard Easy
49
To measure the difficulty index, the writer used the formula below:
P = Difficulty Index.
B = Total students that answered correct.
JS = Total all of students.
In this case, the writer used a computer program namely Microsoft
Office (Excel). The writer analyzed the test items of English summative
tests based on the formula above. The total scores of the students were
entered in Microsoft Excel sheet and it was arranged in descending order.
The detail of the items analysis based on the students’ score would be
attached in appendices. It was the students’ result of English Summative
test on pilot study. It showed us the respondent (students) and each test.
The students answered from the first number until the last number.
Moreover, detail of items analysis was compared to the
classification of difficulty index. It would show which each items of the
questions were included hard, moderate, or easy question. According to
Daryanto (1999: 182), the difficulty index is classified as the criteria
below:
1. Item at P 0.00 until 0.30 is hard question.
2. Item at P 0.30 until 0.70 is moderate question.
50
3. Item at P 0.70 until 1.00 is easy question.
Moreover a criterion of difficulty index, According to Arikunto (1995:
215), criteria of good question is the moderate. It was not too hard or too
easy. Hard questions could motivate the high students to more study hard.
The easy questions could motivate the low students to study more.
The result of the items analysis especially the difficulty index was
in the table below:
Table 4.1
List of the Difficulty Index on the Test Items
Question
Number Difficulty Index
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
51
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.2
0.6
0.6
0.2
0.7
0.6
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.6
The table 4.1 above showed that there any questions were hard,
moderate, and easy question. The hard questions were question number 41
52
and 44. The moderate questions were question number 2, 3, 4, 8, 10, 12,
13, 19, 20, 22, 27, 29, 32, 33, 35, 37, 40, 42, 43, 46, 48, and 50. The easy
questions were question number 1, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 23,
24, 25, 26, 28, 30, 31, 34, 36, 38, 39, 40, 45, 47, and 49.
2. Analysis of the Discrimination Index
Second, the writer measures the discrimination index. According
to Arikunto (1995: 215), discrimination index is ability of item to
discriminate between high students and low students ability. Number
which is show the discrimination index called difficulty index. It was at
range 0.00 until 1.00. In contradiction, the difficulty index not identifies a
negative (-) sign and the discrimination index identifies negative (-) sign.
-1.00 0.00 + 1.00
Discrimination index Discrimination index Discrimination index
Negative Low High/Positive
Test item was not good when the item which is answered correctly by the
upper student or lower student because it haven’t discrimination index.
Such if the upper and lower group answered correctly or false together,
the point was same. That item has point D 0.00 because it have not
53
discrimination index. To measure the discrimination index, the writer used
the formula below:
-
= PA – PB
D = Discrimination index
J = Total students
JA = Total of upper group
JB = Total of lower group
BA = Total of upper group who answered correctly
BB = Total of lower group who answered correctly
PA =
= Proportion the total of upper group who answered
correctly (P as the discrimination index).
PA =
= Proportion the total of lower group who answered
correctly.
In this case, the writer used a computer program namely Microsoft
Office (Excel). The writer analyzed the test items of English summative
tests based on the formula above. The total scores of the students were
entered in Microsoft Excel sheet and it was arranged in descending order.
The detail of the items analysis based on the students’ score would be
attached in appendices. It was the students’ result of English Summative
54
test on pilot study. It showed us the upper group and the lower group
based on the students’ scores. Then the writer found the discrimination
index of question.
Moreover, detail of items analysis was compared to the
classification of difficulty index. It would show which each items of the
questions were included hard, moderate, or easy question. According to
Daryanto (1999: 182), the discrimination index is classified as the criteria
below:
Table 4.2
Classification of Discrimination Index
Achievement Criteria
0.70 ─ 1.00 Excellent
0.40 ─ 0.70 Good
0.20 ─ 0.40 Satisfactory
0.00 ─ 0.20 Poor
Moreover classification, According to Aggrawal (1986), items
which had negative discrimination is rejected. Items that had
discrimination index above 02.00 are ordinarily regarded
satisfactory for use in most tests of academic achievement.
The writer found the upper and lower group based on the students’
scores. The description of the data was in the table below:
55
Table 4.3
List of Upper and Lower Group based on the Scores
No Student Upper
Group
Lower
Group
1 59 50 36
2 61 50 36
3 93 50 36
4 6 49 35
5 47 49 35
6 52 49 35
7 55 49 35
8 57 49 35
9 71 49 35
10 82 49 35
11 87 49 34
12 95 49 33
13 96 49 33
14 102 49 33
15 16 48 32
16 7 47 32
17 19 47 32
18 34 47 32
19 39 47 30
20 44 47 30
21 13 46 30
22 17 46 29
23 25 45 27
24 45 45 27
25 2 44 27
26 98 44 27
27 62 42 27
28 72 42 27
56
29 76 42 26
30 79 42 26
31 80 42 26
32 3 41 26
33 31 41 25
34 36 41 25
35 37 41 25
36 78 41 24
37 92 41 24
38 99 41 24
39 22 40 23
40 40 40 23
41 42 40 22
42 49 40 20
43 54 40 20
44 4 39 20
45 11 39 20
46 20 39 20
47 23 39 19
48 29 39 19
49 100 39 18
50 8 37 17
51 43 37 8
Total 51 2247 1395
57
The table above was the upper and lower group which used to
measure the discrimination index of the test items. The description of the
data was in the table below:
Table 4.4
List of the Discrimination Index on the Test Items
Question
Number Discrimination Index
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.4
0.5
0
0.3
0.7
0.3
0.6
0.4
0.7
0.2
0.4
0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.6
0.5
0.5
-0
0.3
0.4
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.3
58
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
0.7
0.7
0.4
0.7
0.7
0.3
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.7
0.3
0.6
0.3
The table 4.4 above showed that there were discrimination index of
questions. They were in criteria of excellent, satisfactory, good, and poor.
The discrimination indexes that satisfactory were question number 2, 4, 7, 9,
11, 14, 18, 24, 25, 29, 32, 35, 37, 44, 46, 48, and 50. The discrimination
indexes that good were question number 5, 8, 10, 12, 20, 21, 22, 26, 27, 28,
30, 31, 33, 34, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 45, 47, and 49. The discrimination
indexes that poor were question number 1, 3, 6, 13, 15, 16, 17, 19, and 23.
There was no discrimination indexes were excellent.
59
B. Interpretation of the Data
In this section, the writer interpreted the data based on the whole of
analyses above.
First, the writer interpreted difficulty level of questions in test items of
the English summative test. After analyzed the difficulty level based on the
students’ score, the writer found that there any questions were hard, moderate,
and easy question.
Second, the writer interpreted the discrimination index of question in the
test items of the English summative test. After analyzed the discrimination
index based on the students’ score, the writer found that there were the
discrimination index of questions. They were in criteria of excellent,
satisfactory, good, and poor
Based on the analyses above, we can see the description data as follows:
Table 4.5
List of the Difficulty Index on the Test Items
Question
Number
Difficulty
Index Criteria
41
44
0.2
0.2
Hard
2
3
4
8
10
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.6
Moderate
60
12
13
19
20
22
27
29
32
33
35
37
42
43
46
48
50
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
1
5
6
7
9
11
14
15
16
17
18
21
23
24
25
26
28
30
31
34
36
38
39
40
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
Easy
61
45
47
49
0.7
0.8
0.7
Table 4.6
List of the Discrimination Index on the Test Items
Question
Number
Discrimination
Index Criteria
-
-
Excellent
5
8
10
12
20
21
22
26
27
28
30
31
33
34
36
38
39
40
41
42
43
45
47
49
0.5
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.6
Good
62
2
4
7
9
11
14
18
24
25
29
32
35
37
44
46
48
50
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
Satisfactory
1
3
6
13
15
16
17
19
23
0.2
0.1
0
0.2
0.2
0
0.2
0.1
-0
Poor
The tables above showed that mostly the difficulty level of questions in
the test items of the English summative test was in the criteria of the easy
question. It showed that 21 questions were in the criteria of the moderate
question and 2 questions were in the criteria of the hard question.
Based on the tables above, mostly the discrimination index of questions
in the test items of the English summative test was in the good criteria. It
63
showed that 17 questions were in the satisfactory criteria and 9 questions were
in the poor criteria.
C. Finding and Discussion
In this section, the writer discussed the data based on the whole of
analysis above.
The purpose of the data analysis of this research was meant to measure
and find out the difficulty level and discrimination index on items of English
summative test score of the tenth grade students at SMK N 3 Salatiga in
academic years of 2013/2014.
The finding and discussion of this research would be described in the data
below:
64
Item Frequency for each Difficulty Index Range
Figure 4.1
The criteria the of difficulty index were item at P 0.00 until 0.30 is hard question,
item at P 0.30 until 0.70 is moderate question, and the item at P 0.70 until 1.00 is easy
question. Moreover a criterion of difficulty index, According to Arikunto (1995: 215),
criteria of good question is the moderate. It was not too hard or too easy.
In Figure 4.1 above showed the difficulty indexes for 50 test items. There were
21 questions (42%) that placed in the normal position that included to the criteria of
moderate question. In the contrary, there were 27 questions (54%) that included to the
criteria of easy question and there were 2 questions (4%) that included to the criteria of
hard question.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Hard
Moderate
Easy
65
Item Frequency for each Discrimination Index Range
Figure 4.2
The criteria of discrimination index were 0.7 – 1.00 is excellent, 0.40 – 0.70 is
good, 0.20 – 0.40 is satisfactory and 0.00 – 0.20 is poor index discrimination. Moreover
classification, According to Aggrawal (1986), items which had negative discrimination is
rejected. Items that had discrimination index above 02.00 are ordinarily regarded
satisfactory for use in most tests of academic achievement.
Figure 4.2 above, the writer saw the English summative test which administered
in the first grade students of SMK N 3 Salatiga. It had reached 24 questions (42%) were
in good criteria of discrimination index. Then 17 questions (34%) were in satisfactory
criteria of discrimination index. In contrary, the writer found 9 questions (18%) items that
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Nu
mb
er 5
12
22
28
33
38
41
45 2 9
18
29
37
48 1
13
17
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
66
were in the poor criteria. It were rejected either due to difficulty level or discrimination
index.
Based on the discussion above, it could be concluded that there were 9 questions
that must be revised to be a good questions. It had poor of discrimination criteria. It was
18% of the 50 test items in the English summative test.
67
CHAPTER V
CLOSURE
This chapter presents the conclusions and suggestions based on the
analysis of the English summative test that carried out at SMK N 3 Salatiga.
A. Conclusions
From the data in the previous chapter, the writer knew and measured
the difficulty index and discrimination index of the English summative test
which administered in the first grade students of SMK N 3 Salatiga.
Based on the data of difficulty index in chapter IV, there were 21
questions (42%) that placed in the normal position that included to the criteria
of moderate question. In the contrary, there were 27 questions (54%) that
included to the criteria of easy question and there were 2 questions (4%) that
included to the criteria of hard question.
Then based on the data of discrimination index, there were 24 questions
(42%) were in good criteria of discrimination index. Then 17 questions (34%)
were in satisfactory criteria of discrimination index. In contrary, the writer
found 9 questions (18%) items that were in the poor criteria. It were rejected
either due to difficulty level or discrimination index. So, they must be removed
or revised to be good questions.
68
B. Suggestions
Based on the research findings, there are some suggestions which are
addressed to the teachers, institution/school, and other researchers.
1. For the teacher
a. The test maker should be very careful while selecting items.
b. Before designing a test, the test maker should keep on their good effort
and have a good preparation by considering the principles of
constructing the good test items.
c. The test maker should consider that the test items must be
appropriateness with all indicators which listening, reading, and
writing skills in English syllabus. While the items that do not fulfill to
the indicators should be discarded.
d. The test maker should be careful to design the test and if the items do
not fulfill to the syllabus should be revised so that they can be used for
the next evaluation.
e. The poor items are removed or improved to be good questions for
inclusion in the final test.
f. The hard questions can be used to motivate the high students to study
more. Then the easy questions can be used to motivate the low
students to study hard.
69
2. For the institution/school
a. The institution should keep on their good way in giving the chances to
the teachers to follow the training of constructing good test so that the
teachers only make less invalid test items.
b. The institution should keep on supervising the teachers’ work in
constructing the test. Whether the tests constructed have fulfilled
characteristics of good test or not.
c. The institution should store the used items or make items bank.
3. For the other researchers
The writer understands that her research is not the only topic that is
studied. The result of the study merely confirms the hypothesis, but it does
not prove that something absolutely true at all the time. Thus, the research
needs considerable improvement of thought for further research studies.
The writer hopes that the analyses of this study will be employed as
starting point of the future research studies on similar topics. There are also still
many other researcher with the other method of evaluation.
70
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Aggrawal. 1986. Statistical Methods, Concepts, Applications, and Computations. New
Delhi: Sterling Publication.
Anderson, Georgia. 1995. Measurement and Evaluation in Education. Los Angeles:
Hold, Rinehart and Windston Inc.
Anderson, J. Charles. 1995. Language Test Construct and Evaluation. British:
Cambridge University.
Anthony, J. Nitko. 1983. Educational Test and Measurement an Introduction. New York:
Harcourt Brace Jovanich inch.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1992. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta:
Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. et al. 2007. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Bachman Lyle F. and Adrian Palmer. 1984. Language Testing in Practice. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Badan Pengembangan SDM Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, dan Penjamin Mutu
Pendidikan. 2014. Materi Pelatihan Guru Implementasi Kurikulum 2013.
Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Brown, H. Douglas. 2003. Principles of Language Assessment. San Francisco: Addition
Wesley Longman, Inc.
Butler H., Frances and Briere Eugene. 1979. Concepts in Language Testing. Washington:
Georgetown University.
Fernandes. H. J. X. 1984. Testing and Measurement. Jakarta: National Education
Planning.
Griffin, Patrick and Peter Nix. 1991. Educational Assessment and Reporting a New
Approach. Australia: HBJ Harcout Brace Jovanovich.
Gronlund, Norman E. 1982. Constructing Achievement Tests. United States of America:
Virginia Livsey.
71
Hadi, Sutrisno. 1981. Metodologi Research. Jogjakarta: Yayasan Penerbitan Fakultas
Psikologi UGM.
Harmer, Jeremy. 2001. The Practice of English Language Teaching. China: Pearson
Education.
Heaton, J.B. 1988. Writing English Language Test. London: Longman Group.
Holsti Ole. 1999. Content Analysis for the Social Science and Humanities. London:
Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Hughes, Arthur. 2003. Testing for Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge
University.
Lodico, Marguerote. 2006. Methods in Educational Research. USA: HB Printing.
Marien H. Henerson. 1981. How to Measure Attitudes. USA: Regent of University of
California.
Mary and Sydey Salo. 1993. Foreign Language Testing. New York: Regents Publishing
Co.
Muslich, Masnur. 2012. Melaksanakan PTK Itu Mudah (Classroom Action Research)
Pedoman Praktis bagi Guru Professional. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Oller, Jhon W. 1979. Language Test at School. London: Longman Group.
Oxford University. 2008. Oxford Learner’s Pocket Dictionary. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Sudijono, Anas. 1996. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo
Persada.
Sutomo. 1985. Teknik Penilaian Pendidikan. Surabaya: PT. Bina Ilmu.
Tinambunan, Wilmar. 1988. Evaluation of Student Achievement. Jakarta: PPLPTK.
Tinambunan, Wilmar. 1998. Evaluation of Student Achievement. Jakarta: Departmen
Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Widdowson H.G. 2000. Language Testing. Oxford: University.
William, Michael and Stephen. 1982. Handbook in Research and Evaluation. California:
San Diego.
Quinn, Michael. 1978. Utilization-Focused Evaluation. United Stated: Sage Publication.
72
APPENDICES
73
ULANGAN AKHIR SEMESTER GENAP
TAHUN PELAJARAN 2012/2013
Mata Pelajaran : Bahasa Inggris
Kelas / Program : X / Semua Program Jurusan
Hari / Tanggal : Rabu, 5 Desember 2012
Waktu : 07.00 – 08.30 WIB
Guru Mapel : 1. Angga Arga W., S.Pd.
Petunjuk Umum:
1. Isikan identitas Anda ke dalam Lembar Jawab ulangan tengah semester gasal. 2. Tersedia waktu 120 menit untuk mengerjakan paket tes tersebut. 3. Jumlah soal sebanyak 50 butir, 35 butir soal reading dan 15 butir soal listening. 4. Periksa dan bacalah soal-soal sebelum anda menjawabnya. 5. Laporkan kepada pengawas ujian apabila terdapat lembar soal yang kurang jelas, rusak
atau tidak lengkap. 6. Tidak ada pengurangan nilai pada jawaban yang salah. 7. Periksalah pekerjaan Anda sebelum diserahkan kepada pengawas ujian.
~~ SELAMAT BEKERJA ~~
A
74
I. Pilihlah salah satu jawaban yang benar dengan memberikan tanda silang pada huruf A, B, C, D di lembar jawab yang tersedia.
Listening Section
In this section of the test , you will have the chance to show how well you understand spoken
English. There are 4 part to this section with special directions for each part.
Part I Pictures
Question : 1 to 3
Directions:
For each item there is a picture in your test book and four short statements about it on the
tape. They are spoken TWICE, and are NOT WRITTEN out in your test book, so you must listen
carefully. You must choose one statement – (A) , (B) , (C), or (D) – that best describes the
picture. Then , on your answer sheet ,mark your choice.
Example
Look at the following picture Sample answer
A B C D
Now, listen to the following picture.
75
A. There is a glass in front of them. B. There is a wardrobe behind them. C. The garden is near the door D. They are sitting on a sofa
Choice ( D ) – “ They are sitting on a sofa “ – best described what is seen in the
picture.Therefore you should choose mark C on your answer sheet.
Now let’s begin with the question number one.
1.
2.
3
76
Part II Question –Responses
Question 4 to 7
Directions:
In this part of the test , you will hear several questions spoken in English, followed by three
responses , also spoken in English. The question and responses will be spoken twice. They will
not be printed in your test book, so you must listen carefully to understand what the speakers
say. You have to choose the best response to each question.
Now listen to a sample question
You will hear : Woman : Why don’t you come with us to the concert?
You will also hear : Man : (A) I like watching concerts.
(B) Yes, you’ll join us soon.
(C) Sorry I can’t. Maybe next time
Choice (C) –“Sorry I can’t. Maybe next time “ – is the best response to the question “ Why
don’t you join us to the concert ?” Therefore ,you should mark (C) on your answer sheet.
4. Mark your answer on your answer sheet
5. Mark your answer on your answer sheet.
6. Mark your answer on your answer sheet.
7. Mark your answer on your answer sheet.
77
Part III. Short Conversation
Question 8 – 11
Directions:
In this part of the text you will hear several short conversations. You will hear the conversations
twice . The conversations will not be printed in your test book so you must listen carefully to
understand what the speakers say.
In Your test book , you will read a question about each conversations. The question will be
followed by four answers. You have to choose the best answer to each question, and mark it on
your answer sheet.
Example:
You will hear : Man : Do you still have two tickets for the 12.30 pm tour?
Woman : Yes, we do. But they are for the back seat and the tour will
run in thirty minutes,sir.
Man : That’s fine. I’ll be on my way now. Just keep them for me.
You will read : What is the conversation about?
A. Ticket cancellation. Sample Answer B. Booking tickets for a concert. C. Four schedules. A B C D D. Reserving tickets for a tour.
Choice (D) – “Reserving tickets for a tour“ – is the best answer to the question , “What is the
conversation about?” Therefore, you should mark (D) on your answer sheet.
8. What is the dialogue about?
A. Office stationary. B. Handling phones.
78
C. Someone’s job activity. D. Arrangement of meeting.
9. What does the women want?
A. Attend her class for business subject. B. Serves her business colleagues. C. Leaves for Jakarta via Surabaya. D. Purchases tickets for her flight
10. What will the man do?
A. Finish his work. B. Lend his computer. C. Borrow the computer. D. Shut down the laptop .
11. What did the man do?
A. Looked for his cousin in Hawaii. B. Had vacation in Hawaii. C. Joined his friends for vacation. D. Asked the woman to search his cousin.
Part IV. Short Talks
Question 12 to 15
Directions:
In this part of the test you will hear several short talks. Each will be spoken twice .They will not
be printed in your test book so you must listen carefully to understand and remember what is
said.
In Your test book , you will read two or more question about each short talk. Each question will
be followed by four answers. You have to choose the best answer to each question, and mark it
on your answer sheet.
79
Question 12 and 13 refer to the following procedure.
12. What is the main purpose of the talk?
A. To explain procedures. B. To introduce a president. C. To teach a real estate class. D. To ask some questions.
13. What should the participants do after picking up their text book?
A. Hand in their registration forms. B. Find a seat and sit down. C. Get a name tag D. Take a packer of course information.
Question 14 and 15 refer to the following procedure.
14. Who is being announced?
A. The opening of cafeteria. B. The menu of cafeteria. C. The menu schedule D. The price of some food.
15. Who will post the menu on each week at Monday morning?
A. The company. B. The cafeteria. C. The employee D. The chef.
This is the end of the listening section.
80
Questions 16 to 20 choose inappropriate structure in the following sentences or dialogues.
16. A : Hi ?
B : hello. It is Diana. I call you last night, but you weren't at home
A B C D
17. A: Where did you go yesterday?
A B
B: I go to a friend’s birthday party
C D
18. A: What did you ate at the party?
A B
B: I eat a hamburger and fries. It was great!
C D
19.A: How long have you own that TV?
A B
B: I’ve owned it since 1995.
C D
20. A: Seven years? That’s a long time.
A B
B: Yes. They’ve always enjoy cutting hair
C D
81
Question 21 to 23 refer to the following text
A kangaroo is an animal found only in Australia, although it has a smaller relative, called
a wallaby, which lives on the Australian island of Tasmania and also in New Guinea.
Kangaroos eat grass and plants. They have short front legs, but very long, and very strong
back legs and a tail. These they use for sitting up on and for jumping. Kangaroos have been
known to make forward jumps of over eight metres, and leap across fences more than three
metres high. Thelsoy can also run at speeds of over 45 kilometres per hour.
The larges kangaroos are the great Grey kangaroo and the Red kangaroo. Adults grow to
a length of 160 metres and weigh over 90 kilos.
Kangaroos are marsupials. This means that the female kangaroo has an external pounch on the
front of her body. A baby kngaroo is very tiny when it is born, and it crawls at once into this
pounch where it spends its first five months of life.
21. Where is kangaroo found?
A. In japan
B. In London
C. In Austria
D. In Australia
22. It is about the kangaroos, except………
A. They eat grass and plants
B. They have short front legs
C. They have very strong back legs
D. They are not marsupials
23. The followings are what the kangaroo can do, except……
A. They have been known to make forward jumps of over eight metres
B. They can leap across fences more than three metre high
C. They can also run at speeds of over 45 kilometres per hour
82
D. They can’t walk
Question 24 to 26 refer to the following text
To : All students and teachers
Come and visit our new librabry. Lots of new books (brand new novels and non-fiction books)
are available. You can also enjoy our newest DVDs collection.
Head of library
Ramadhan
24. What are the things offered in the new library ?
A. Books and DVDs.
B. Old and new books.
C. New books and novels.
D. New DVDs and non-fiction books.
25. Why does the writer make the announcement ?
A. To resume a new novel.
B. To invite the reader to visit the library.
C. To let the reader know about the head of library.
D. To help the reader know where to find the DVDs.
26. Who make the announcement ?
A. Ramadhan
B. All students
C. All teachers
83
D. The librarian
Question 27 to 29 refer to the following text
I remember the day when I first got Sandy, my 7 year old cat. I wanted to name her because
she was so cute. My older sister Michelle convinced me to name her Sandy Bucket instead; so
we could call her Sandy for short. I was so attached to Sandy. Every time I saw her, I couldn’t
walk away, I would just have to hug her. I even slept at the end of my bed, so I can hug her the
whole night even though I was freezing.
I always remember so many fun times with Sandy. Like when we would run and jump off the
end of our pier, and Sandy would chase after us. When I was scared or mad, I would just hug
Sandy and everything wouldn’t be so bad.
But one night, right before I went to bed, my mom let her out. While I went to sleep, my
mom went to call Sandy back in. But she didn’t come in, so I thought she maybe went inside my
neighbor’s house. As my mom and dad went outside to look for Sandy, I became really worried.
They couldn’t find her. Every ten minutes they would go out to look for her, so I went to bed
hoping she was safe. I just thought she got lost and would come back tomorrow.
The next day was the worst. My mom woke us early and told me and my sister, Michelle,
that Sandy died last night. I was so sad and did not want to do anything that day. When I was
going to school, I could not stop crying. At school all my friends made me cards and tried to
make me stop crying, but I couldn’t. my teacher would always look at me and ask why I was
crying. Even my friends was crying with me.
When I got home I went to my room crying really loudly. I wanted to scream. I came
downstairs and hugged my mom. She said we could get another cat. Then, she was trying to
find a new cat on the internet. But I did not want another cat. I want Sandy. She never found
one that looked like Sandy or at the same age or even in the same kind.
That night I slept with my mom and we prayed for Sandy. I kept thinking she was a ghost at
the end of the bed, so I stayed closed to my mom. The next day I figured out that if Sandy was a
ghost, she would not scare me or haunt me. She would be waiting for me to play with her.
I still think about Sandy every day and wish she could come back.
Source: http://www.mertonschool.com (August 12,2004)
84
27. The type of the text is …
A. Spoof
B. Newsitem
C. Recount
D. Narrative
28. What is the main idea of the text …
A. Sandy’s dead
B. The lost of beloved cat
C. The careless of the writer’s mom
D. Looking for Sandy
29.. How could the cat got lost?
A. The cat played with another cat
B. The neigbour kept the cat in his/her house
C. Someone took the cat to the remote area
D. The writer’s mom let the cat out one night
Question 30 to 32 refer to the following text
Many hours later, when her feet were tired from walking and her lips were dry from
thirst, she came to the cottage belonging to the witch. The stepmother peeped though the
window. Her heart cried out when she saw the two children.
She picked up the broom leaning against the door and crept inside. The witch was putting
some stew in the oven when the stepmother gave her an almighty push. The witch fell into the
oven and the stepmother shut the door.
‘Children, I have come to save you,’ she said hugging them tightly. I have done a dreadful
thing.
85
I hope in time you will forgive me. Let me take you home and become a family again.
They returned to their home and the stepmother became the best mother anyone could wish
to have, and of course they lived happily ever after!
30. The story is about a stepmother who ……
A. Cried every night
B. Planned to eat her children
C. Begged a witch for money
D. Saved her children from a witch
31. Which statement is TRUE about the step mother?
A. She was the witch’s friend.
B. She loved her stepchildren.
C. She hit the witch with a broom.
D. She locked her children in a cage.
32. “The witch fell into the oven and the stepmother shut the door.” (Paragraph 4)
The underlined word can be replaced by the word …………..
A. Closed
B. Opened
C. Painted
D. Marked
86
Question 33 to 42. Choose the appropriate option to complete the dialog
33. Robert: What did you buy yesterday?
Alice: I _____ some new clothes. I also played tennis.
A. Buy
B. Bought
C. Bring
D. Brought
34. Robert: What ____ you do after your tennis match last week?
Alice: Well, I went home and took a shower and then went out.
A. Do
B. Does
C. Did
D. Done
35. Robert: Did you eat in a restaurant last night?
Alice: No, I ___ . My friend Jacky and I ate at my house
A. Do not
B. Does not
C. Did not
D. Done not
36. Alice: What did you do?
Robert: I _____ my bike this morning!
A. Wash
B. Washed
C. Washing
D. Waste
87
37 Robert: Did you ______ your dinner?
Alice: Yes, we enjoyed our dinner very much.
A. Enjoy
B. Enjoyed
C. Eat
D. Ate
38. Alice: What did you do?
Robert: I _____ home and studied for my test!
A. Stay
B. Staying
C. Stayed
D. Stair
39. Paul: How long ____ you studied here?
Sara: I’ve studied here for three years
A. Has
B. Have
C. Did
D. Had
40. David: Have you ever eaten Thai food?
John: Yes, I’ve ____ it a few times.
A. Has
B. Have
C. Did
D. Had
88
41. Ed: Has she arrived yet?
Fran: No she still _____ arrived.
A. Has not
B. Have not
C. Did not
D. Had not
42.Tom: Have you _____ Henry recently?
Alejandro: No. Have you?
Tom: I haven’t seen him since the summer.
A. See
B. Saw
C. Seen
D. Seing
Question 43 to 44. Complete the text with the words provided
When I just hang out in a mall one day, I saw a very 43______ bag. I love this bag at the first
sight.
This was the first time I've spent much money on a bag and I don't regret it.
The bag is wonderful. It is made of thin but strong leather. The weight is light and the size keeps
it from getting stuffed with junk. It has a long shoulder strap that I like because it keeps the bag
hands-free. Its neutral color is fun and sporty. The design is simple and well-made.
The bag is very functional. It is the perfect size to carry a 44_______ phone, a pocket sized
wallet, a small book, a pack of gum, and pens. It also fits well into my laptop backpack for bike
commuting to school. This bag also has more pockets inside so my small items don't all fall to
the bottom. In overall I really satisfy with bag.
89
43. A. Ugly
B. Bad
C. Beautiful
D. Expensive
44. A. Free
B. Call
C. Mobile
D. Pay
Question 45 to 47. Complete the text with the words provided
One day I went to Bandung with my friend for a vacation. We went there on night bus
when we arrived in Cianjur, the bus stopped for a rest. I got of the bus to get a cup of coffee,
but my friend didn’t. He went to a mosque to 45____. It took only a few minutes to pray, but
when I came out again the bus was not there. It had gone! Shocked and confused. I asked the
shopkeeper about the bus. She said that the bus had departed about five minutes ago.
I tried to 46 ______ my friend on my cell phone, but the battery was running low. I
couldn’t do anything but hope and pray. After several minutes, my wish came true. The bus
came back! Got on the bus and walked to my seat. I was so ashamed when everybody on the
bus looked at me. I could feel my face turn red.
I asked my friend why she didn’t 47 ______ the driver that I was still outside.
“I did, I told him several times that you were outside, but he said that you were in the bus
toilet because he saw a man going into the toilet,” my friend replied, laughing. The other
passengers smiled at me. I was so embarrassed.
45. A. Sing
B. Bath
C. Pray
D. Buy
90
46. A. Hear
B. Look
C. See
D. Call
47. A. Ask
B. Tell
C. See
D. Clean
Question 48 to 50. Complete the text with the words provided
The Kingdom of Medang Kamulan, in Java, came a young when man, by the name of Aji
Saka to fight Dewatacengkar, the 48____ King of The Country who had a habit to eat human flesh of his own people. Aji Saka himself he came from Bumi Majeti.
One day he told his two servants, by the name of Dara and Sembodo, that he was going to java. He told them that while he was away, both of them have to guards his Heirloom / Pusoko.
No one except Aji Saka himself not a allowed to take the Pusoko. In the big battle, Aji Saka could successfully push Dewata Cengkar to fall to the South Sea. Dewata Cengkar did not die, he 49_______ a Bajul Putih (White Crocodile). Aji Saka became a ruler of Medangkamulan.
Meanwhile a woman of the village of Dadapan, found an egg. She 50______ the egg in her
Lumbung (Rice Barn). After a certain period the egg vanished, instead a snake found in the rice
barn. The villagers would like to kill the snake, but the snake said : “I’m the son Aji Saka, bring me to him”.
Aji Saka told the snake, that he would be recognized as his son, if the could kll the Bajul
Putih in the South Sea. After a long stormy battle which both sides demonstrating physical strength and showing skillfull ability of fighting, the snake could kill Bajul Putih.
48. A. Nice
B. Wise
C. Cruel
D. Patient
91
49. A. Became
B. Run
C. Take
D. Die
50. A. Buy
B. Sell
C. Put
D. Lost
92
Difficulty Index of Test Items based on the Students’ Scores
No. (JS)/ Question
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0
2 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
3 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
4 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1
5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
8 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1
9 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1
10 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
11 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1
12 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1
13 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
14 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0
15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1
16 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
17 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1
18 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1
19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
20 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1
21 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
22 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
23 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1
24 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1
93
25 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1
26 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
27 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1
28 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
29 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1
30 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
31 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
32 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0
33 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1
34 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1
35 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
36 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
37 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
38 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
39 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
40 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1
41 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
42 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1
43 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0
44 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
45 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1
46 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1
47 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
48 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0
49 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
50 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
51 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0
52 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
94
53 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0
54 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1
55 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
56 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
57 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
58 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
59 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
60 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
61 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
62 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
63 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0
64 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0
65 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0
66 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
67 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
68 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
70 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
71 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
72 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1
73 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
74 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
75 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
76 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
77 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
78 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
79 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1
80 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
95
81 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
82 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
83 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1
84 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0
85 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
86 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0
87 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
88 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0
89 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
90 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
91 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0
92 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
93 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
94 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
95 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
96 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
97 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0
98 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
99 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
100 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1
101 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
102 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
B 85 64 69 57 74 72 85 65 78 66 84 65 54 76 84 76 73 77 69 66
P 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6
96
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0
1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0
0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1
1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0
0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0
0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0
0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0
0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1
97
1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0
0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0
0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1
1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1
1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1
1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0
0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1
1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1
98
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1
1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1
0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0
0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0
0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1
0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0
0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0
1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
99
1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0
0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1
0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0
0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1
0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0
0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
75 67 84 77 77 73 61 86 64 79 86 65 71 85 66 78 54 77 86 76
0.7 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.7
100
41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Score
Total
0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 27
0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 44
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 41
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 39
1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23
1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 47
1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 37
0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 30
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 29
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 39
1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 24
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 46
0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 36
1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 19
0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 48
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 46
1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 22
0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 47
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 39
0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 20
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 40
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 39
1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 23
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 45
1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 32
1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 36
101
0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 20
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 39
1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 32
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 41
0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 32
1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 24
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 47
1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 32
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 41
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 41
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 30
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 47
1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 40
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 30
1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 40
0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 37
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 47
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 45
1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 24
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 36
1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 40
1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 35
1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 25
1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 27
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 40
1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
102
1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 35
1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 17
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 50
1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 35
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 50
0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 42
1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 25
1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 26
1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 26
1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 35
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 27
1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 35
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 18
1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 42
1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 33
1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 33
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 27
0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 42
0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 25
1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 41
1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 42
0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 42
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 27
1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 34
103
1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 19
1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 33
1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 26
1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 26
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 20
1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 35
1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 20
1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 41
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 50
1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 35
1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 27
0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 44
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 41
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 39
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 20
1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
30 68 65 30 75 66 84 67 78 64 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.6
P =
P: Difficulty Index, B: Total students that answered correct, JS: Total all of students.
104
Discrimination Index (Scores of Upper Group)
No No./Ques 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
1 59 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 61 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
3 93 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
5 47 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
6 52 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7 55 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
8 57 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
9 71 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
10 82 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
11 87 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
12 95 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
13 96 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
14 102 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
15 16 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
16 7 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
17 19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
18 34 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
19 39 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
20 44 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
21 13 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
22 17 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
23 25 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
24 45 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
25 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
26 98 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
1
105
27 62 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
28 72 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
29 76 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
30 79 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
31 80 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
32 3 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
33 31 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
34 36 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
35 37 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
36 78 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1
37 92 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1
38 99 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
39 22 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
40 40 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
41 42 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
42 49 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
43 48 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
44 4 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
45 11 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
46 20 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
47 23 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
48 29 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
49 100 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
50 8 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1
51 43 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1
Total 51
Students 48 43 37 38 49 36 49 51 46 50 51 50 33 49 48 38 42 49 37 48 49 47 41 47 48
PA
0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 1 0.7 1 1 0.9 0.9 1 1 0.6 1 0.9 0.7 0.8 1 0.7 0.9 1 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9
106
26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Total Score
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 50
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 50
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 50
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 49
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 48
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 47
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 47
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 47
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 47
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 47
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 46
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 46
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 45
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 45
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 44
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 44
1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 42
107
0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 42
1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 42
0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 42
1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 42
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 41
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 41
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 41
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 41
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 41
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 41
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 41
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 40
1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 40
1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 40
1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 40
1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 36
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 39
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 39
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 39
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 39
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 39
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 39
1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 37
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 37
37 38 49 50 45 48 43 37 49 51 46 33 49 48 38 42 39 37 48 49 47 49 51 46 50 0.7 0.7 1 1 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 1 1 0.9 0.6 1 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.9 1 0.9 1 1 0.9 1
108
Discrimination Index (Scores of Lower Group)
No No./Ques 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1
2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0
3 9 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0
4 10 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1
5 12 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0
6 14 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
7 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
8 18 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
9 21 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0
10 24 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0
11 26 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0
12 27 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
13 28 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0
14 30 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0
15 32 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1
16 33 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0
17 35 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0
18 38 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
19 41 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
20 46 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0
21 50 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
22 51 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1
23 53 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
24 54 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
25 56 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
26 58 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
27 60 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
109
28 63 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1
29 64 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
30 65 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
31 66 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
32 67 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
33 68 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
34 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
35 70 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
36 73 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1
37 74 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1
38 75 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
39 77 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
40 81 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
41 83 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0
42 84 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
43 85 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1
44 86 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
45 88 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
46 89 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
47 90 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
48 91 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
49 94 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
50 97 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1
51 101 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Total
37 21 32 19 25 36 36 14 32 16 33 15 21 27 36 38 31 28 32 18 26 20 43 30 29
PB
0.7 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.8 0.6 0.6
Discrimination Index based on the Scores of Upper Group and Lower Group
D
0.2 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.5 0 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.7 0.2 0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.6 0.5 0.5 -0 0.3 0.4
110
26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Total Score
0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 27
1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23
1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 30
1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 29
1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 24
1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 36
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 19
0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 22
1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 20
0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 23
1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 32
1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 36
1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 20
1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 32
1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 32
1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 24
1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 32
1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 30
1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 30
1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 24
1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 35
1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 25
1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 27
1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 40
111
1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 35
1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 17
1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 35
1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 25
1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 26
1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 26
1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 35
0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 27
1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 35
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 18
0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 33
0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 33
0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 27
0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 25
0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 27
0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 34
1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 19
0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 33
1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 26
1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 26
0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 20
1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 35
112
1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 20
1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 35
0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 27
1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 20
36 23 37 14 34 38 22 34 36 15 32 21 28 38 38 35 29 35 17 26 19 35 16 32 14 Discrimination Index based on the Scores of Upper Group and Lower Group
0.7 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.3 0.6 0.3
113
-
= PA – PB
D = Discrimination Index
J = Total students
JA = Total of upper group
JB = Total of lower group
BA = Total of upper group who answered correctly
BB = Total of lower group who answered correctly
PA =
= Proportion the total of upper group who
answered correctly.
(P as the discrimination index).
PA =
= Proportion the total of lower group who
answered correctly.
Explanation:
Question number 1
JA = 51 JB = 51 PA = 0.9
BA = 48 BB = 37 PB = 0.7
So, D = PA - PB
= 0.9 - 0.7
= 0.2
Discrimination index of question number 1 were 0.2 which meant that the
classification was poor.