www.ITEinc.US

1

Design Tools to Support NAVSEA Ship Design & Program Management

&NAVSEA - CNET

HSI for Training Systems

ITE Inc.April 12, 2007

1507A N. Colonial TerraceArlington, VA 22209

703-528-3711www.ITEinc.US

References:

ASNE Technical Paper, “Achieving Human Systems Integration through Design,” June 2003

I/ITSEC Technical Paper, “A Total Ship – Crew Model to Achieve Human Systems Integration,” December 2004

Available on ITE Website at www.ITEinc.US

www.ITEinc.US

2

Agenda

1. Purpose

2. History of NAVSEA Physics Based Design (PBD) Tools

3. CAD-Physics History: • Integration• Design Applications• HSI Applications

4. Crafting a Design Environment to supportSECNAV, NAVSEA & CNET Objectives

5. Capture all validated models for HSI reuse

6. Way Ahead

www.ITEinc.US

3

1. Purpose

www.ITEinc.US

4

Purpose

• To share ITE 8 year history of working with NAVSEA to develop:– Physics Based Design Tools– Integration of Physics Tools with 2D-3D CAD Tools– Reuse of validated physics model to support HSI– ICAS support– DDG-1000 Design Tools

• Support NAVSEA objectives for managing ship design: use concurrent V&V– Support DoD – SECNAV Policy: Simulation Based Acquisition

• Discuss successful, practical examples of concurrent V&V of design using “physics” modeling and reuse of captured models for HSI objectives for NAVSEA & CNET:

– Shore & Afloat Dynamic Eng / DC & Total Ship Training (BFTT)– Real-time Readiness Assessment ship systems (ICAS)– Engineering & DC Operational Decision Aids– Distance Support– Future Ship Modernization

• Support Next Generation Integrated Power Systems (NGIPS) design architectures and supporting design tools

• Reduce RISK to Performance, Cost and Schedule

www.ITEinc.US

5

2. History of NAVSEA Physics Based Design (PBD) Tools

www.ITEinc.US

6

Simsmart “Physics” analysis was competitively selected by NAVSEA in 1996 is a multi-discipline Physics Based Design (PBD) tool for HM&E process and control systems:• Liquids

• Gases

• HVAC

• AC/DC electrical generation and distribution

• Logic and analog machinery control systems

• Propulsion

www.ITEinc.US

7

To create SIMSMART™ flow sheets To create SIMSMART™ flow sheets just drag & drop the desired equipment andjust drag & drop the desired equipment andcontrol icons on the screen from selectedcontrol icons on the screen from selectedmodel libraries, link them and entermodel libraries, link them and entertheir characteristicstheir characteristics

Simsmart™ Physics Tool OverviewSimsmart™ Physics Tool Overview

www.ITEinc.US 8

Physics Modeling … “Does it work?”

Run-TimeData Trend ...

CAD (Computer Aided Drafting) … “Does it fit?”

HMI

The

Tools

SIMSMART™

Performance Metrics

www.ITEinc.US

9

Ship Modernization / HSI: Open the ModelCreate & Validate the New Design HSI App.

Integrated Product Data Environment (IPDE

www.ITEinc.US

10

Typical Simsmart™ IV&V Applications

•LPD17 - Machinery seawater cooling, firemain, ballast/de-ballast, air de-ballast hydraulics, chill water system, fuel fill and transfer, MOGAS, nitrogen inerting, ballast tank internals

•DD21 Alliance (DD21/DDX/DDG1000 - HM&E and DC systems design V&V

•CG47 Upgrade – AAW Warfare Commander Alt: Chilled water system, firemain, electrical generation and distribution

•LHA 1 Class - Firemain flow network analyses & life cycle studies

•BFTT - Battle Force Tactical Training System: Total Ship Training System

•LSD41 Class - Seawater cooling system design & life cycle studies

•CVN68 Class - Firemain, JP5 fuel handling system, collecting holding & transfer (CHT); System concept, trade-off studies and system operation

•T-AKR Class - De-watering system troubleshooting, cargo storage area HVAC system troubleshooting

•Navy Post Graduate School Ship Progressive Flooding Analysis

•Non-oily waste membrane treatment - Concept design studies, design impacts & operator training

•DDG51 – De-watering, Firemain …

•Arsenal Ship R&D - Firemain, ballast/de-ballast

•LHD8 and more …

LPD

DDG

CVN

LSD

T-AKR

LHA

CG

DDG1000

www.ITEinc.US

11Modeling Domains should be Complementary throughout the Design & Life Cycle Support Process

Domain of Single Discipline Component to System Design

Domain of Multi-discipline Real-time, Component, System and Total Ship Modeling For Concurrent Engineering Analysis, Verification, Performance

Monitoring & HSICharacteristics (Typical):

•Models essentially custom built

•Modeling SW does not come with Navy HM&E models

•Usually non-real time

•Usually single discipline: Electrical or Fluid or HVAC or Gas or …

•Used for: sizing, transient / fault analysis, protective device settings …

•Used for R&D, EDM development, Analysis

•In general, do not interface to ship production CAD - CAM process (see notes)

Saber™

MATLAB™

EDSA™ 1

Mentor Graphics™

FLOWMASTER™

SIMSMART™ 2

Multi-DisciplineTotal Ship Model

Smart ProductModel

(CPC Based)

(PBD - CADBy ship / class)

Ship Design / Production &Lifecycle Support

NAVSEA CPC Based Libraries & Multi-discipline for Total Ship Modeling:

•Electrical

•Fluid

•Gas

•HVAC

•Controls

Transition to Smart Product Model /

Total Ship Model when

Design Verified byEngineering Analysis,

PE Certified& Defined in CPC Format

Part Numbers for Acquisition

Operating Doctrine / Human-in-Loop Performance Models

•EOSS

•EOCC

•CSOSS

•Human Task-Skill Actions: Time and Event based

HSI Support

•Virtual Ship Model

•Embedded Training

•Manpower – Automation Analysis

•Plant Performance Monitoring, Distance Support

•Operational Decision Aids

Ship / Class 2D/3DCAD-Physics Dynamic V&V

Real-Time, Multi-discipline, Cascading Effects of HM&E operations & damage

EASYPOWER™ACSL™

Physics Based Ship Engineering Design Analysis, V&V & HSI Tools

VTB

1.EDSA is associated with CATIA for electrical design

2. SIMSMART supports systems engineering as well as total ship models using CPC parts with electronic data exchange with shipyard CAD-CAM systems.

SPICE™EASY5™

RTDS™

ROSE™CPC Compliant

Components

PSCAD™

SIMSMART™ 2

meets ALL Multi-DisciplineRequirements

www.ITEinc.US

12

From NAVSEA highlights:

“SIMSMART Inc. has successfully modeled 8 piping systems for Avondale.

These models have revealed system deficiencies which may not have been

noticed using traditional flow network calculations (spreadsheets). They

have also made obvious several system enhancements that save money and

production time while still meeting the requirements of the contract. For

example, the chilled water model was used to show that a portion of the main

had to be increased in size from 5 to 6 inches due to the unanticipated

demand that developed in this area of the ship through the detail design

process. Without this modeling capability it is entirely possible that this

shortfall in the system may have gone unnoticed until such time where fitting

the larger main into the overhead would have been impossible. This is just

one example where this exceptional tool has more than paid for itself.”

Daniel S. Van VoorhisUS Navy - LPD 17 Machinery IPTDated ~ Oct 2001

www.ITEinc.US

13

3. CAD-Physics Development History: a. Integration Sponsors:

* DDG-1000* NSRP

b. Design Applicationsc. HSI Applications

www.ITEinc.US

14

CNET : Task Force Excelhttp://www.uscg.mil/TCYORKTOWN/PTC/downloads/TFE.ppt

Had tasked Staff in 2000 to Report status / requirements for CNSF training See CNSF PPT Jan 2002

Engineers at Ingalls scope CAD & dynamic Design Validation using physics models

Design Tools to Improve Efficiency of Program Management and Human Systems IntegrationDesign Tools to Improve Efficiency of Program Management and Human Systems Integration Rev 5Rev 5

Compiled by ITE Inc 2007 www.ITEinc.US (print 11 x 17 or larger)Compiled by ITE Inc 2007 www.ITEinc.US (print 11 x 17 or larger)

Navy Training Requirements

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 20051999

SBIR Ph 2 Ends

PMS 430 BFTT Observes SIMSMART™ Physics Ship Model at SNAME

2006

LPD 17 is Navy’s First attempt at full digital design incorporating CAD and Physics Dynamic Validation, Selects SIMSMART™ via competition

2007

Draft DOP and ROI provided for CNSF

ExecutiveSummary

CNO ADM Clark ordered Executive Review Navy Training (ERNT)

CNET: 5 Vector Model / Career Training &Education from Ship Acquisitionthru Ship Lifecycle

430 Has BFTT CS SIM-STIM;

Needs HM&E & DC SIM-STIM 1st Demo/Model delivered Notional CG

I/ITSEC 2001 International BFTT Demo Tactical & Eng, DC via WAN U.S. U.K.-Aus.-Netherlands.

New NAVSEA VADM Balisle

Re-org NAVSEA IWS-1E Rick

Bragg. All new contracts.

Staff change over.

DSR SBIR Contract Mod to add Simsmart HM&E-DC model

Model of notional “CG”

DSR / Simsmart

/ OAK contracts end

Raytheon Phase 4 of DD(X)

HM&E dynamic design validation tools acquired by BIW & Ingalls for Modeling DD21 (DDX);by Avondale for PD17; by Ingalls for CG47 Mod; Gibbs & Cox, JJMA and NAVSEA etc.

I/ITSEC 2000, see DCAMS at BFTT booth, Recommend join SBIR

First Real Time cascading casualties for damage and HM&E / repair tied to BFTT CS, using EOSS / EOCC / CSOSS

CNSF VADM Tim LaFleur observesBFTT / Simsmart Demo @ SNA 2002

SNA 2002

Mar 2002:Directed Demo for

VADM LaFleur & Staff @ SD

@ SBIR 2002 CNSF: Can you provide CD for “A” School Sailors per ERNT? Yes.

CoC CNSF RADM Terry

Etnyre

3/05 GAO Report 05-183: findings include … ship design incomplete before production causing cost over run & deficient systems. Also see INSURV MSG: PREINSURV Norfolk VA 181811Z July 05 LPD-17 Incomplete …

DD(X) beginsBIW/ Ingalls Together = DD21 Alliance Both select Simsmart via Competition

Ingalls sells idea to DD21 Alliance & Navy

DD21 Dies

NGSS wins DDX

Protest

NGSS wins again, as Design Agent

Katrina Flood Damage

NAVSEA National Shipbuilding Research Program (NSRP), Increase US - international Competitive Capability with an Advanced Shipbuilding Enterprise (ASE) & Processes

NSRP $$ to Simsmart to integrate with CATIA CAD for Dynamic Validation

NSRP $$ to Simsmart

to integrate with AutoCAD (Ship Constructor) for Dynamic Validation

NSRP $$ to Simsmart to integrate with Intergraph CAD for Dynamic Validation

OAK e-DCAMS OAK DCTMS

VADM Lee Gunn ReportRevolution in Training w/To build careers / useMulti-Level Metrics …

BTSWG Mtgs

OAK added to SBIR

Ingalls FSO CG 47 Mod dynamic design Validation / Model:•Electrical Plant 13K Objects•Firemain 4K Objects•Chill Water 4K Objects

TSTC ICD Drafted … Effort stopped with NAVSEA Reorg.

SBIR Phase 2 BFTT CS / HM&E and DC Model demonstrated

Ship Models for Training from Ship Design Validation Tools

DD21 Program CATIA CAD + Simsmart Physics for Design Validation

DCAMS NAVSEA O5L4 Program Objective Memorandum (POM) 5 years System of Record: Budget line

LCS Ships (did not use dynamic design validation = no model)

DDG1000 Simsmart Physics to CATIA V5 Revs 15, 16, 17 … continues

DDG1000 Simsmart Physics to CATIA V5 Revs 15, 16, 17 … continues

DDX Starts

DD(X) obtains CATIA- SIMSMART™ integration in Dec 04 for Dynamic Validation of Fluid and HVAC (Electrical TBD)

Replace Dongle license plugs for SIMSMART™

DDX Dynamic Validation and Integration to Continue

LPD17: 11 Vital Fluid systems validated with models for NAVSEA. HVAC & Electrical not validated

2003 ASNE Tech Paper: “Achieve HSI through Design”

2003 ASNE Tech Paper: “Achieve HSI through Design”

LHD-8 Modeling for SEA-05D . CSC

LHD-8 Modeling for SEA-05D . CSC

2004 I/TSEC Tech Paper “A Total Ship – Crew Model to Achieve HSI”

2004 I/TSEC Tech Paper “A Total Ship – Crew Model to Achieve HSI”

Premise: Use ship design tools to support ship design / program managers during all phases of design, trials and tests, permitting IV&V monitoring the designs and HSI objectives in progress, linked to corresponding CAD drawings. Physics – math models (basis of design), now “lost”, are captured for reuse for: Distance Support, Performance Monitoring, Readiness Assessment, Operational Decision Aids for DC and Engineering, and future ShipAlt planning. Also support advanced dynamic interactive training ashore and afloat, as well as to provide the underlying computations to teach students how and why systems work – prepare them for critical thinking, college work, etc.

NAVSESS $$ HPAC Model

for ICAS Virtual “Hot Plant” and

OBT

NAVSESS $$ HPAC Model

for ICAS Virtual “Hot Plant” and

OBT

2005 – 2007 ANZAC Frigate Total Ship HME&DC Model

2005 – 2007 ANZAC Frigate Total Ship HME&DC Model

IWS-1E BFTT?

Capt Shannon Joe Loudon

NAVSESS $$ AC Unit Model

for ICAS Virtual “Hot Plant” and

OBT

NAVSESS $$ AC Unit Model

for ICAS Virtual “Hot Plant” and

OBT

www.ITEinc.US

15

4. Crafting a Design Environment to supportSECNAV / NAVSEA / CNET Objectives

www.ITEinc.US

16

SD/PM’s IV&V Virtual Ship Model

Design Continuum Overview

*PBD = Physics Based Design

RequirementsRequirementsContinuous CAD = Does it “Fit”?Continuous CAD = Does it “Fit”?

Continuous PBD* = Does it “Work”?Continuous PBD* = Does it “Work”?

RDT&E - Conceptual

Design

RDT&E - Conceptual

Design

PreliminaryDesign

PreliminaryDesign

ContractDesign

ContractDesign

DetailDesign

DetailDesign

ConstructionConstruction

Future Modernization

Future Modernization

Tests & Trials - Commissioning

Tests & Trials - Commissioning

Ship OperatesShip Operates

Ship Design / Program Manger’s IV&V Rolling Total Ship Performance Verification (Quarterly?)

Quarterly IV&V Performance Verification

Question? When in the Ship Design Process should the electric plant “see” the H&M plant? Why not from day one?

www.ITEinc.US

17

Improve Efficiency of Program Management and Human Systems IntegrationTransformational Ship Design Process – Improve & Control Design – Support the Lifecycle

Common Parts

Integrated Ship Design Tools Spiral Design

SpiralDesign

Process IV&V• Conceptual• Preliminary

• Contract• Detail

Objectives:•Program Control

•PerformanceAssessment•Automation

•Reduced Crew•Survivability

•Safety

•Delivera Full Ship

PBD Modelto support

Tests &Trials

T&Tusing the

PBD model“VirtualShip”

Before &DuringDockTrials

All Systems,

Separately&

Together

• Electrical• Fluid• Gas

• HVAC• Controls

T&Tof the

“ActualShip”

Before &DuringSea

TrialsAll

Systems,Separately

&Together

• Electrical• Fluid• Gas

• HVAC• Controls

Tests & Trials

•The Ship

• Real-timeValidatedDynamic

Modelof theShip

•CADDrawings

• Update allconfiguration

partnumbers

to theERP – TDKM

IPDEPrograms

Deliver

Shore & Afloat Dynamic Eng / DC

& Total ShipTraining

(BFTT)

•Real-timeReadiness

Assessmentship systems

(ICAS)

• Engineering &DC Operational

DecisionAids

• DistanceSupport

•Future ShipModernization

HSI Lifecycle

PBD = Design

‘WORKS”

CAD = Design “FITS”

LEAPS

Smart Product Modelw/Multi-Discipline Models

Integrated w/ CAD

Integrated

ITE Inc. 1507A N Colonial Terrace, Arlington,. VA 22209 * jfamme@ITEinc.US * www.ITEinc.US

View Companion Technical Paper @

http://www.businessdevelopmentusa.com/docs/HSISymTSDCJune2003.pdf

View Companion Technical Paper @

http://www.businessdevelopmentusa.com/docs/HSISymTSDCJune2003.pdf

www.ITEinc.US

18

Periodic Dynamic V&V Design Review Process

Smart Product ModelIntegrated CAD - Physics

HM&E Component and Systems Designers – P&IDs …

CAD:

It Fits

Physics:

It Works, in real-time Total Ship

Model

CAD & Physics by

Deck

Periodic Dynamic V&V Performance Reviews System and Total Ship Every

Phase / Step of Design

NAVSEA Technical

PEO ShipsWill ship’s HM&E plant support ship & all

missions / modules dynamically thru all

scenarios?

Shipbuilder

All Systems Work Together

LEAPSTeamCenterEnvironment

Electrical Fluid HVACGas Controls DC

www.ITEinc.US

19

ANZAC TPTS Propulsion Systems

www.ITEinc.US

20

Summary: Applications of Multi-Discipline Physics-based Design Tools

• SECNAV – NAVSEA Shipbuilding Objectives:

• Demonstrate dynamic “performance” during RDT&E and all design phases– System to total ship level

• Demonstrate Mission and HSI Performance Requirements• Eliminate Risk• Reduce Costs• Model can be used as the specification• Model can be re-used for all HSI Lifecycle Support Applications

• Mature tools: 19 year development to TLR-9• 19 years Support to NAVSEA, Shipbuilders and Marine Engineering Companies

– Numerous ship design programs (see slide)• Integration of CAD-Physics under NSRP - ASE Phase II:

– CATIA, ShipConstructor, Intergraph• Demonstrated HSI Applications needed by CNET:

– SBIR Total Ship Model for Training (BFTT CS with HME&DC model » real time cascading damage and recovery

• Captures all physics models (basis of design) as well as the CAD• Currently Builder delivers only drawings, none of the “math” (intellectual property)

• ASNE-SNAME technical papers 2003-4: continuous IV&V• Recommended all designs use continuous IV&V (Highlighted LCS program)• Resulting Validated Ship Model Supports the Full Ship Lifecycle• Training• Decision Aids• Modernization• Distance Support / SORTS

www.ITEinc.US

21

5. Example of applying validated models:

BFTT embedded training system SBIR

www.ITEinc.US

22

TRL-8 and 9 Applications Physics Based Design to Human Systems Integration

• For NAVSEA and CNET: Shore & Afloat Dynamic Eng / DC & Total Ship Training, Accession to BFTT

• Real-time Readiness Assessment of ship systems in support of ICAS

• Engineering & DC Operational Decision Aids

• Distance Support

• Future Ship Modernization

www.ITEinc.US

23

Imperative Requirement for Validated HM&E Models

Summarize CNET Memo 1 Feb 07

Imperative Need for Electronic Classrooms & Transportable training media CDROMS for fleet Accession and Embedded

Training

The Navy cut instructors betting on low cost PC simulation [like they saw, in part, @ HM&E SS demos in 2001 – 2002

(next 4 slides)]

But NAVSEA reorganized in 2003, VADM LaFleur the champion retired and the initiative died. Next few slides are what VADM LaFleur requested, saw and wanted …all of the necessary models would be a nearly “free” by product of a

Navy ship design process based on continuous IV&V modeling for program management / managing the design

www.ITEinc.US

24

PMS430 – BFTT - Total Ship Training & Operational Decision Aids Architecture

BOPCScenario Generation

& Control

IT21 LAN / SWAN

TPTSPlatform Simulation

Ship Interior Communications

TraineeTrainee

DebriefProducts

Central Control Station (CCS), Damage Control Central (DCC),Machinery Spaces, Repair Stations 2, 3, 5, 8, …

TraineeTrainee

Perceived Truth

Perceived Truth

IT21 SWAN & 2-Way Wireless LAN

Performance

Monitoring,

Training &

Assessment

GROUND TRUTH

Two-way

STOW LANDATA

COLLECTION LAN

PERCIEVED TRUTH

TrainerTrainer

TrainerTrainer

Ground Truth

Training Flags

DCAMS

MCSWearable Computers

USN & Coalition Combat Systems Training

www.ITEinc.US

25

TPTS Instructor Station (1)

www.ITEinc.US

26

Total Ship Training (TST) Integrated Continuum

BFTT TSTS

EngineeringDamage Control

Validated HMEC&DC Ship Systems Dynamic Models Created During Ship Design or From Ship Design Data for Legacy Ships

Benefits:

• Full Fidelity at-Sea Individual and Team Training• “Training more relevant and more motivating at sea” (SNA 2002)

• Fills SWOS “Need for Engineering & Damage Control Training at Sea” (SNA 2002)

• Based on Ship’s EOSS-EOP-EOCC-CSOSS

• Supports CDROM-based Individual Self Paced Training

• Supports SWOS / A-School Classroom Training

Same Models

“Scaled”

Same HMI “Look & Feel”

At Every Level of Training

www.ITEinc.US

27

Application Across Training Continuum(Revolution in Training and Task Force Excel Concept)

Accession Training

Enroute Training

Initial Qualification Refresher Training

CD-ROM with Dynamic Engineering ModelsTailored to assigned ship

- Actual system configurations- Actual EOSS, EOCC, EOP, CSOSS, etc.

Contains: Computer Based Training Lessons

- Cognitive Learning Principles Incorporated Simulation Based Training Scenarios

-Simulation Engine for interactive training

Performance and Debrief Products- Can be printed out or downloaded to floppy- Performance history, test scores, module completion status, etc. downloaded to floppy and imported into training database on arrival at ship

LAN Based Training- Uses same models as CD-ROM and Total Ship Training System- Updates training database- Provides performance and debrief products

Total Ship Training System

www.ITEinc.US

28

Meeting Six Star Requirements for Design, Performance & Training

Legacy Ships and Future Ships

NAVSEA Design & HSI

•Control Design, Performance Cost and Schedule

•Reduce Incidents: Improve Training, Performance, Maintenance & Distance Support (See COMNAVSEA Guidance April 2007)

CNET / NAVPERS Manning & Training

•Instructor manning in decline

•Imperative need for low cost PC Based Accession, In Route & Embedded Training (See CNET Memo Feb 2007)

ASNE Technical Paper, “Achieving Human Systems Integration through Design,” June 2003

I/ITSEC Technical Paper, “A Total Ship – Crew Model to Achieve Human Systems Integration,” December 2004

Available on ITE Website at www.ITEinc.US

ASNE Technical Paper, “Achieving Human Systems Integration through Design,” June 2003

I/ITSEC Technical Paper, “A Total Ship – Crew Model to Achieve Human Systems Integration,” December 2004

Available on ITE Website at www.ITEinc.US

One Process Both Apps

TSDC Design & HSI Process

www.ITEinc.US

29

One Design-HSI Process Supports NAVSEA & CNET Requirements

Legacy Ships and Future Ships

NAVSEA Design & HSI Achieves:

• Improved Control of Design, Performance, Cost and Schedule; Tools to Reduce & Respond to Incidents: Training, Performance, Maintenance & Distance Support

CNET / NAVPERS Provided at little cost:

• Validated Dynamic HME&DC models for Eng Plant Operator Course low cost PC-Based Accession, In Route & Embedded Training.

Common Parts

Integrated Ship Design Tools Spiral Design

SpiralDesign

Process IV&V• Conceptual• Preliminary

• Contract• Detail

Objectives:•Program Control

•PerformanceAssessment•Automation

•Reduced Crew•Survivability

•Safety

•Delivera Full Ship

PBD Modelto support

Tests &Trials

T&Tusing the

PBD model“VirtualShip”

Before &DuringDockTrials

All Systems,

Separately&

Together

• Electrical• Fluid• Gas

• HVAC• Controls

T&Tof the

“ActualShip”

Before &DuringSea

TrialsAll

Systems,Separately

&Together

• Electrical• Fluid• Gas

• HVAC• Controls

Tests & Trials

•The Ship

• Real-timeValidatedDynamic

Modelof theShip

•CADDrawings

• Update allconfiguration

partnumbers

to theERP – TDKM

IPDEPrograms

Deliver

Shore & Afloat Dynamic Eng / DC

& Total ShipTraining

(BFTT)

•Real-timeReadiness

Assessmentship systems

(ICAS)

• Engineering &DC Operational

DecisionAids

• DistanceSupport

•Future ShipModernization

HSI Lifecycle

PBD = Design

‘WORKS”

CAD = Design “FITS”

LEAPS

Smart Product Modelw/Multi-Discipline Models

Integrated w/ CAD

Integrated

www.ITEinc.US

30

Support SECNAV/ NAVSEA / CNET

Transformation & Sea Enterprise … Business Efficiency (Dynamic IV&V based Metrics) …

… based on Visible, Integrated, Spiral Design Processes

Reduce risk and cost in shipbuildingSupport in Sea Enterprise savings

Support HSI across all phases of the ship lifecycleCollect all Navy Intellectual Property not just drawings

NAVSEA developed these tool sets over 8 yearsReturn on Investment has been shown

Tools are TLR 8 & 9

Way Ahead?

ITE Inc.1507A N. Colonial

Terrace

Arlington, VA 22209

703-528-3711

References:

ASNE Technical Paper, “Achieving Human Systems Integration through Design,” June 2003

I/ITSEC Technical Paper, “A Total Ship – Crew Model to Achieve Human Systems Integration,” December 2004

Available on ITE Website at www.ITEinc.US

www.ITEinc.US

31

Mission Effectiveness by Developing & Re-Applying Validated Simulation Models

Integrated Design•Doctrine•Ship Design•Automation Design•Simulation Based Total Ship-Crew Model•Validate Automation - Reduced Manning

Operational, Threat & Damage Adaptive

•Autonomic (M&S Based) Reconfiguration•Intelligent Agents•Autonomic Response

Security•Access Points•Remote Monitoring

Core Model & Simulation

Embedded M&S Based Training / Decision Aids•Networked BG to Shore•Individual to Total Crew•Sailor accession training

Simulation Based Acquisition & Operation

•Integrated CAD-Physics Smart Product Model through all design phases, with dock & sea trial model validation, reuse of the validated model that will run in parallel during operations, supporting decision aids, ship wide performance monitoring to support all functions on this slide and future Alts & modernization

Mission Readiness•Local & Network within ship & across Battle Force platforms•Combat Systems•Engineering Systems•Damage Control•Distant Support•EHM & CBM•Electronic Manuals•3D Visualization•Crew Location / Monitoring

Damage Control•Autonomic•Intelligent Agent SW•M&S Based Reconfiguration•Personal On-The Move Displays•Combat Systems•Engineering Systems•Damage Control•Electronic Manuals•3D Visualization

Integrated & Distributed Command Capabilities

•Combat & Engineering Systems•Personal On-Move PDA Communications & Control •Electronic Navigation / M&S Based Decision Aids

www.ITEinc.US

32

Technology Readiness Level (TRL) Definitions

Technology Readiness Level Description

1. Basic Principles observed and reported.

Lowest Level of Technology Readiness. Scientific research begins to be translated into applied research and development. Examples might include paper studies of a technology’s basic properties.

2. Technology concept and/or application formulated.

Invention begins. Once basic principles are observed, practical applications can be invented. Applications are speculative and there is no proof or detailed analysis to support the assumptions. Examples are limited to analytic studies.

3. Analytical and experimental critical functions and/or characteristic proof of concept.

Active research and development is initiated. This includes analytical studies and laboratory studies to physically validate analytical predictions of separate elements of the technology. Examples include components that are not yet integrated or representative.

4. Component and/or breadboard validation in laboratory environment.

Basic technological components are integrated to establish that they will work together. This is relatively “low fidelity” compared to the eventual system. Examples include integration of “ad hoc” hardware in laboratory.

5. Component and/or breadboard validation in relevant environment.

Fidelity of breadboard technology increases significantly. The basic technological components are integrated with reasonably realistic supporting elements so that it can be tested in a simulated environment. Examples include “high fidelity” laboratory integration of components.

6. System/subsystem model or prototype demonstration in a relevant environment.

Representative model or prototype system, which is well beyond TRL 5, is tested in a relevant environment. Represents a major step up in technology’s demonstrated readiness. Examples include testing a prototype in a high fidelity laboratory environment, or in a simulated operational environment.

7. System prototype demonstration in an operational environment.

Prototype near, or at, planned operational system. Represents a major step up from TRL 6, requiring demonstration of an actual system prototype in an operational environment, such as an aircraft, vehicle, or space. Examples include testing the prototype in a test bed aircraft.

8. Actual system completed and “flight qualified” through test and demonstration.

Technology has been proven to work in its final form and under expected conditions. In almost all cases, TRL represents the end of the true system development. Examples include developmental test and evaluation of the system in its intended weapon system to determine if it meets design specifications.

9. Actual system “flight proven” through successful mission operations.

Actual Application of the technology in its final form and under mission conditions, such as those encountered in operational test and evaluation. In almost all cases, this is the end of the last “bug fixing” aspects of system development. Examples include using the system under operational mission conditions.