Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
Transcript of Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
1/24
HEAT TRANSFER ENHANCEMENT DUE TO
COOLANT EXTRACTION ON THECOLD SIDE OF EFFUSION COOLING PLATES
Riccard o Da Sog he, A . A nd reini , B. Facch ini and L. Mazzei
Ergon Research s.r.l .Via Panciatichi, 92 - 50139
Florence (Italy)e-mail:
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
2/24
Presentation Outline
Introduction Effusion cooling arrangement
Reasons and objectives of the present work
CFD computations CFD setup Test matrix Validation of numerical tools Results
Conclusions
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
3/24
Introduction
ACARE Vision 2020 objectives and future ICAO-CAEP standards specifically
introduce NO x emission abatement as one of the main goals for nextgeneration civil aero-engines Research efforts dedicated to the introduction of lean premixed
combustion systemsRepresent the most effective way to reach the NO x reductiontargets
The design of the liner cooling system which becomes morecritical
Up to 70% of the overall air mass flow is utilized for fuelpreparation and the initiation of lean combustion
Goal in combustor development Significant reduction of the amount of coolant
3
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
4/24
Introduction: Effusion cooling arrangement
High efficiency cooling scheme Effusion cooling
Huge number of small holesRecent improvements of drilling capabilityHighly innovative potential
Promising acoustic damping capabilities More uniform film protection of the
liner hot side
Significant heat sink effectHeat removed by convection inside holes
Relevant heat extraction by the cold sideconvection cooling
4
Avio NEWAC Lean Burn Combustor GT2013-94667
Courtesy of Paradigm precisionCourtesy of Paradigm precision
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
5/24
Introduction: Previous literature contributions
Hot side heat transfer
Pioneering works from Sasaki et al. (1979), Mayle and Camarata (1975), Andrews (1990, 1991, 1995) Recent works about effectiveness and heat transfer measurements on
effusion cooling systems Papers from Scrittore et. al. (2005, 2006) as well as the recent work of Ligrani
et. al. (2012) and Martin and Thorpe (2012) report detailed description of theeffect of blowing ratio in large arrays of full coverage film cooling geometriesRange of engine representative blowing ratiosNumber of rows to obtain a full developed filmIncrease of film effectiveness at higher BRs when considering high free streamturbulence
Paper from Andreini et. al. (2013) investigates adiabatic and overalleffectiveness of effusion cooling plates at different operating conditions
A correlation for overall effectiveness by the effusion geometries proposedto help preliminary assessment of different design solutions
5
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
6/24
Introduction: Previous literature contributions
Cold side heat transfer
Gerendas and co-workers (2001) pointed out that in case of effusioncooling up to 30% of the heat extracted from the liner is due to cold sideconvective cooling
This evidence is explained by a heat transfer augmentation at the extraction
holes entranceSparrow et. al (1982), Cho et. al (1987) and Dorignac (2005): The heat transfercoefficient augmentation at the liner cold side is motivated by stagnation regionsobserved downstream the extraction holes
The heat transfer coefficient enhancement factor EF depends on the suction ratio SR
=
These studies focused on isolated extraction holes
6
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
7/24
Introduction: Previous literature contributions
Cold side heat transfer
Cottin et al. (2011) numerically investigate the aero-thermal field ofeffusion cooling plates.
The authors pointed out an expression to correlate the cold side heattransfer coefficient augmentation to the local suction ratio.
The coefficients of this correlation were not publishedThe impact of the hole spacing as well as the operating conditions of the system arenot accounted for.The flow approaching the effusion plate is modelled as fully developed.
Correlations for the effusion plate cold side heat transferenhancement factor as a function of plate porosity and real engine
operating condition are NOT available in the open literature
7
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
8/24
Aim of the work
Analyze, by means of CFD, the flow field on the cold side of effusioncooling plates when considering 30 angled perforations
Both geometrical and fluid-dynamic design parameters are considered toimprove the physical understanding of the fluid flow that characterizethese devices
Effusion plate porosity Feeding channel Reynolds number Pressure ratio across the plate Turbulence intensity
Develop a correlation for the htc enhancement factor as afunction of both plate porosity and operating conditions
Reasons and objectives
8
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
9/24
Ansys CFX-14.0 Steady state solutions, ideal gas
Numerical domain 18 cooling holes rows
Turbulence modeling k- SST
Low Reynolds approach
Gamma-Theta transition model Boundary conditions
Feeding channel inletPlug flow (uniform velocity)Total TemperatureTurbulence intensity and length scale
Feeding channel outletStatic pressure
Discharge PlenumOpening condition (Pressure)
WallsFixed Temperature
CFD solver setup
9
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
10/24
Geometries Plate porosity
1.16%1.82%2.84%
Operating conditions
Feeding channel Reynolds number250000 750000
Pressure ratio 1.005 1.05
Turbulence intesity32% 16%
Test matrix
10
=0.25
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
11/24
Validation of numerical setup
Holes discharge coefficient Experimental data from Gritsch and co-workers (2001)
11
=
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
12/24
Validation of numerical setup
Heat transfer coefficient Experimental data from Byerley (1989)
Single extraction hole arrangement The numerical domain mimics the experimental test rig
The comparisons are done in term of Enhancement Factor EF
= where = 0.021 . .
Both line lateral averaged and area averaged profiles are considered
12
Line lateral average Area average surface
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
13/24
Validation of numerical setup
Line-averaged Enhancement Factor profiles Sensitivity to mesh refinement
Three different meshes are compared These grids were generated changing the global scale factor of 25% and +25% and hence halving and
doubling the number of elements
Mesh independence is achieved when considering the standard grid
13
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
14/24
Validation of numerical setup
Sensitivity to turbulence model Standard k- SST vs k- SST -Re t
14
EF peak is always achieved at thedownstream hole edge The effects of flow extraction is
relevant up to 8 hole diametersdownstream
Fully turbulent simulations over-predictthe EF significantly
Accordingly with Byerlay (1989) theboundary layer downstream the
extraction hole presents a transitionalbehavior
The k- SST -Re t improves theagreement between the CFD andthe experiments significantly
L i n e - a v e r a g e
d
A r e a - a v e r a g e
d
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
15/24
Results
15
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
16/24
Post-processing and scaling procedure
For each hole, three entities have been created A triangle-shaped plane long 2 S x and wide S y /2, where htc and EF are area averaged A plane located in correspondence of the hole and normal to the flow, where Re, Pr,
Vfeeding channel and T 0,bulk are calculated A plane located within the hole, where V hole is calculated
The heat transfer coefficient and the EF are calculated as follow:
=
, ; =
0 = 0.0243 . .
16
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
17/24
Results: Effects of Pressure Ratio =1.16, Re=550k, Tu=32%
The pressure ratio across the plate affects significantly the Enhancement Factor As the pressure ratio increase the EF parameter increase
Increase of leads to an increase of SR
17
The enhancement factor slightlydecreases moving from thefeeding channel inlet to its exit
The decreasing rate is more evident at thefirst holes of the array
The EF trend becomes roughly flat whenapproaching the effusion plate exit
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
18/24
Results: Effects of Pressure Ratio =1.16, Re=550k, Tu=32%
The enhancement factor slightly decreases moving from the feeding channel inletto its exit
This behavior is motived by the interplay of the eddy viscosity trend and the suction ratio trendThe eddy viscosity decrease due to both the holes bleeding and the walls presenceThe SR increases due to the perforations bleeding
18
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
19/24
Results: Effects of Reynolds number and Turbulence intensity =1.16, =1.05
The feeding channel Reynolds numberhas a weak impact on the EF
As the Re decreases the EF slightincreases
Confirms what observed in case ofisolated holes (Byerlay (1989), Andreiniet al. (2014))
The increase of the turbulence levelleads to an higher enhancement factor The effect of the turbulence level on the
EF is modest
A reduction of Tu by 50% involves areduction of EF by 6%
19
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
20/24
Results: Effects of effusion plate porosity Re=550K, =1.05, Tu 32%
The Enhancement Factor is quiteaffected by the effusion plate
porosity
As the increases, EF increases The EF averaging procedure considers
surfaces closest to the holes leading tohigher EF mean levels
EF levels very close to the effusion holesinlet are not influenced so much by the parameter
As the plate porosity increases, the EFdecays from the peak value to itsminimum in a smoother way
20
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
21/24
Results: Effects of effusion plate porosity Re=550K, =1.05, Tu 32%
As increases, the EF decays in asmoother way
As increases more mass flow rate perunit length is collected close to theholes region
The higher velocity component normalto the wall results in a thinner boundarylayer enhancing the heat transfer
process
21
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
22/24
Results: CFD data reduction The Enhancement Factor is expressed as function of the Pressure ratio
across the plate and its porosity
= 5.73 + 0.89 + 5.41 + 0.135
Mean error 4.8% Std. Deviation 3%
22
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
23/24
Conclusions
A three dimensional CFD analysis was performed in order to investigate the heattransfer at the cold side of effusion plates Both geometrical and fluid-dynamic design parameters have been considered
Extraction holes spacing both in streamwise and spanwise direction leading to porosity factorstypically implemented on real engines
The CFD setup has been extensively validated by means the experimental data providedby Byerley (1989) and by Gritsch et. al
The validation campaign shows that the CFD is able to confidently catch the EF
The analysis pointed out that: The effects of both feeding channel Reynolds number and the turbulence intensity at the
inlet of the cooling section, have a weak effect on the enhancement factor An empirical correlation for the prediction of the cold side heat transfer coefficient
enhancement factor EF has been proposed:It expresses the EF related to each extraction hole as a function of the pressure ratio and theeffusion plate porosity factor
23
-
8/10/2019 Italy 2014ugm Heat Transfer Enhancement
24/24
HEAT TRANSFER ENHANCEMENT DUE TO
COOLANT EXTRACTION ON THECOLD SIDE OF EFFUSION COOLING PLATES
Riccard o Da Sog he, A . A nd reini , B. Facch ini and L. Mazzei
Ergon Research s.r.l .Via Panciatichi, 92 - 50139
Florence (Italy)e-mail: