IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh...

26
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] WEEKLY LIST No. 16 OF 2020 FROM : 08-09-2020 To 10-09-2020 COURT NO. : 7 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH NOTE :- ON 09.09.2020 REGULAR HEARING SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate 1 C.A. No. 1844/2010 IV-A H.S.GOUTHAM BHARTI TYAGI[P-1] Versus RAMA MURTHY AND ANR. ETC. P. R. RAMASESH[R-1], [R-2] Connected C.A. No. 1845/2010 IV-A H.M.RAVINDRA KUMAR ROHIT AMIT STHALEKAR[P-1] Versus RAMA MURTHY AND ORS. ETC. P. R. RAMASESH[R-1], [R-2], A. SUBBA RAO[R-3] 2 C.A. No. 5910/2009 XII K.RAKKIANNA GOUNDER K. K. MANI Versus THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR. AND ANR. M. YOGESH KANNA, VINODH KANNA B.[R-2] 3 C.A. No. 6077/2009 IV-A GURUWARI BAI SATISH PANDEY[P-1] Versus JAGDISH PRASAD BANSAL SHARMILA UPADHYAY[R-1] 4 C.A. No. 2892/2009 III-A GIRIJA PRASAD TIWARI (D) THR. LRS. SUNIL KUMAR VERMA[P-1] Versus RAMAPATI TIWARI (DEAD) AND ORS. AJIT SINGH PUNDIR[R-1], TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-2], [R-3] 5 C.A. No. 6721-6722/2009 III CHAMPALAL JAVANTRAJ SHETH E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1] Versus THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2][GR], [R-3][GR], [R-11][GR], [R-12][GR], [R-13][GR], MINAKSHI VIJ[R-4], [R-18], [R-20], RASHMI SINGHANIA[R-8], SHEELA GOEL[R-9], ARCHANA PATHAK DAVE[R-16], NACHIKETA JOSHI[R-6], [R-19], T. MAHIPAL[R-5], [R-7], [R-17], [R-28], [R-29], [R-30], [R-31] FOR ON IA 96406/2009 6 C.A. No. 1330/2010 XI-A THE LAW SECRETARY . LAW (B) DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF KERALA AND ORS. G. PRAKASH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3] Versus K.P.GEORGE A. RAGHUNATH[R-1] 7 C.A. No. 6157/2013 XIV-A MAHANT SURENDRA NATH SUMITA HAZARIKA[P-1] Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RACHANA SRIVASTAVA[R-2], BINU TAMTA[R-3]

Transcript of IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh...

Page 1: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 16 OF 2020 FROM : 08-09-2020 To 10-09-2020

COURT NO. : 7HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDYHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

NOTE:-ON 09.09.2020

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 C.A. No. 1844/2010

IV-AH.S.GOUTHAM BHARTI TYAGI[P-1]VersusRAMA MURTHY AND ANR. ETC. P. R. RAMASESH[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1845/2010IV-A

H.M.RAVINDRA KUMAR ROHIT AMIT STHALEKAR[P-1]

Versus

RAMA MURTHY AND ORS. ETC. P. R. RAMASESH[R-1], [R-2], A. SUBBARAO[R-3]

2 C.A. No. 5910/2009XII

K.RAKKIANNA GOUNDER K. K. MANIVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.AND ANR. M. YOGESH KANNA, VINODH KANNA B.[R-2]

3 C.A. No. 6077/2009IV-A

GURUWARI BAI SATISH PANDEY[P-1]VersusJAGDISH PRASAD BANSAL SHARMILA UPADHYAY[R-1]

4 C.A. No. 2892/2009III-A

GIRIJA PRASAD TIWARI (D) THR. LRS. SUNIL KUMAR VERMA[P-1]Versus

RAMAPATI TIWARI (DEAD) AND ORS. AJIT SINGH PUNDIR[R-1], TANMAYAAGARWAL[R-2], [R-3]

5 C.A. No.6721-6722/2009III

CHAMPALAL JAVANTRAJ SHETH E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.

HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2][GR], [R-3][GR],[R-11][GR], [R-12][GR], [R-13][GR], MINAKSHIVIJ[R-4], [R-18], [R-20], RASHMISINGHANIA[R-8], SHEELA GOEL[R-9],ARCHANA PATHAK DAVE[R-16], NACHIKETAJOSHI[R-6], [R-19], T. MAHIPAL[R-5], [R-7],[R-17], [R-28], [R-29], [R-30], [R-31]

FOR ON IA 96406/2009

6 C.A. No. 1330/2010XI-A

THE LAW SECRETARY . LAW (B)DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF KERALA ANDORS.

G. PRAKASH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusK.P.GEORGE A. RAGHUNATH[R-1]

7 C.A. No. 6157/2013XIV-A

MAHANT SURENDRA NATH SUMITA HAZARIKA[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RACHANA SRIVASTAVA[R-2], BINUTAMTA[R-3]

Page 2: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 78 C.A. No. 9472/2010

XIIA.SUBRAMANIAN AND ANR. G. BALAJIVersusR.PANNERSELVAM E. R. SUMATHY

9 C.A. No. 7230/2012XIV-A

HIMACHAL ROAD TRANSPORTCORPORATION AND ANR. HIMANSHU TYAGI[P-1], VINOD SHARMA[P-2]

VersusHIMACHAL ROAD TRANSPORTCORPORATION RETIRED EMPLOYEESUNION

PRIYA PURI, [R-1]

10 C.A. No. 4394/2010XIV-A

BOLORAM BORDOLOI RAJIV MEHTA[P-1]VersusLAKHIMI GAOLIA BANK . AND ORS. MITTER & MITTER CO.[R-1], [R-1], [R-2], [R-5]

11 C.A. No.5800-5801/2017XII-A

YARLAGADDA PARTHASARADHI K. SARADA DEVI

VersusYARLAGADDA TULASAMMA . AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY, K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI

12 C.A. No. 5167/2010IV

KHUSHI RAM AND ORS. RANBIR SINGH YADAV[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusNAWAL SINGH AND ORS. ROHIT KUMAR SINGH[R-1]

13 C.A. No. 1083/2012XII

T.NADU ELECT.BOARDAND ORS. ANDORS. M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1][GR]

VersusK.SUBRAMAIAM S. GOWTHAMAN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1084/2012XII

TAMILNADU ELEC.BOARD AND ANR. M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1][GR]

VersusM.RANGANATHAN(DEAD) THROUGHLRS MADHUSMITA BORA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1085/2012XII

TAMILNADU ELEC.BOARD AND ANR.AND ANR. M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1][GR]

VersusA.CYRIL ANZU. K. VARKEY[R-1]

14 C.A. No. 9493/2010III

KAMLABEN(D) TR.LRS.. AND ORS. NACHIKETA JOSHI[P-1.4], [P-1.3], [P-1.2],[P-1.1], [P-1], [P-2.1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT . AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1]

15 C.A. No. 4020/2010III-A

U.P.HSG. AND DEVELOPMENT BOARDAND ANR. VISHWAJIT SINGH

VersusNAMIT SHARMA PRASHANT KUMAR

16 Crl.A. No. 1078/2010II-A

SURENDRA BANGALI @ S.S. ROUTELE PRAMOD DAYAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND ABHISHEK[R-1]

17 Crl.A. No. 1050/2010II-C

SATBIR SINGH @ GATTU D. N. GOBURDHAN[P-1]VersusSTATE(GOVT.OF N.C.T.OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

18 Crl.A. No. 1008/2010II-C

R.DAMODARAN S. GOWTHAMANVersusTHE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

19 C.A. No.8721-8722/2010XI-A

KERALA REVENUE VILLAGE STAFFORGANISATION (KRVSO),REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY

RADHA SHYAM JENA[P-2]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. C. K. SASI

Page 3: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 720 C.A. No. 8163/2009

IVTEK CHAND JAGRATI SINGH[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], MAYURIRAGHUVANSHI[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5862/2012XIV-A

SHRI SANJIB DEB ROY AND ANR. MAYURI RAGHUVANSHI[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], B. K.SATIJA[R-5], [R-8], JAGRATI SINGH[R-4], [R-6],[R-7]

21 Crl.A. No. 361/2010II-A

ARIFVALI MUHAMMED SHAIKH HIMANSHU MUNSHI[P-1][SCLSC]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

22 C.A. No.4616-4618/2010IV

JAGMOHAN SINGH DHILLON ETC.ETC. D. MAHESH BABU

VersusSATWANT SINGH AND ORS. VINEET BHAGAT, KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-5]

23 Crl.A. No. 1910/2010II-A

BALU SUDAM KHALDE AND ANR. K. L. JANJANI[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

24 Crl.A. No. 1533/2011II-A

SHRIKRISHNA AFTAB ALI KHANVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

25 Crl.A. No. 1889/2011II-B

HAMSA @ HAMMED HARINDER MOHAN SINGH[P-1][AMICUSCURIAE]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

26 Crl.A. No. 1404/2010II-A

SHRINIWAS TRIPATHI M/S ARS ASSOCIATES[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HARSH PARASHAR[R-1]

27 C.A. No. 3034/2012XII

RAMACHANDRA REDDY AND ORS. G. BALAJI[P-1]VersusRAMULU AMMAL SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR[R-1]

28 C.A. No.2037-2038/2010XI-A

ITTY P. K. MANOHAR

VersusIVY ABRAHAM AND ORS. LIZ MATHEW, [R-2]

29 C.A. No.5199-5201/2011XIV-A

UNMUKT BHATNAGAR AND ORS. KUSUM CHAUDHARY[P-1]

Versus

MANOJ BHATNAGAR (D) BY LRS.. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY[R-1.2], RAJIVRANJAN DWIVEDI[R-1]

30 Crl.A. No. 2004/2010II

HIMMATA RAM MUKUL KUMAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

31 C.A. No.9998-10009/2011III

AMRUTBHAI SOMABHAI PATEL RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA

VersusSPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER .AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26807/2015III

LASIBEN JIVANJI THROUGH HERPOWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDERDASHRATHBHAI PATEL

SUMITA RAY

VersusONGC LIMITED . AND ANR.

Page 4: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26833/2015III

THAKOR PAPATJI GABHAJI THROUGHHIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDERDASHRATHBHAI PATEL

SUMITA RAY

VersusONGC LIMITED . AND ANR.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26300/2015III

PATEL DASHRATHLAL RAMANLAL SUMITA RAY

VersusONGC LTD AND ANR.

32 C.A. No. 3876/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYAVersus

JAMEA HIDAYAT TRUST AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN, PRAGATI NEEKHRA, K. L.JANJANI, EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3874/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVT.AUTH. S. K. BHATTACHARYA[P-1]

VersusM/S S.M.S.INVESTMENT CORP.P.LTD.AND ORS.

COAC[R-1], PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1], K. L.JANJANI[R-1], EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3872/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYA

VersusM/S RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT. LTDAND ORS. AND ORS.

COAC, PRATIBHA JAIN, PRAGATI NEEKHRA, K.L. JANJANI, EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No. 3873/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYA

VersusM/S S.M.S.INVESTMENT CORP.P.LTD.AND ORS.

COAC, PRATIBHA JAIN, PRAGATI NEEKHRA, K.L. JANJANI, EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No. 3875/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYA

VersusM/S RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT. LTD.AND ORS. AND ORS.

COAC, PRATIBHA JAIN, PRAGATI NEEKHRA, K.L. JANJANI, EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No. 3871/2017XV

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

Versus

M/S S.M.S.INVESTMENT CORP. . ANDORS.

PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-2],[R-3], S. K. BHATTACHARYA[R-4], EQUITY LEXASSOCIATES[R-10], K. L. JANJANI[R-11], [R-12],[R-13]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3882/2017XV

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusM/S RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH P.LTD..AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, SARVESH SINGHBAGHEL, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3883/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusM/S SMS INVESTMENT CORPPORATION(P) LTD. AND ORS.

SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN, PRATIBHA JAIN, K. L.JANJANI, B. KRISHNA PRASAD, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3877/2017XV

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusJAMEA HIDYAT TRUST . AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3881/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

Versus

Page 5: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7THE JAMEA HIDAYAT TRUST AND ORSAND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, K. L. JANJANI, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3878/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusM/S. RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT. LTD.AND ORS. AND ORS.

SARVESH SINGH BAGHEL, PRATIBHA JAIN, K.L. JANJANI, B. KRISHNA PRASAD, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3880/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusM/S SMS INVESTMENT CORP.P.LTD.AND ORS.

SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN, PRATIBHA JAIN, K. L.JANJANI, B. KRISHNA PRASAD, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No.15528-15531/2017XV

ABDUL RASHID MIR AND ANR. MUKUL KUMAR

Versus

M/S. RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT.LTD.AND ORS AND ORS.

B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-5], [R-6], ROHIT K.SINGH[R-2]

33 Crl.A. No. 2251/2010II-C

FEDRICK CUTINHA S. N. BHAT[P-1]VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2265/2010II-C

KRISHNAPPA @ KITTU NAIKA N. ANNAPOORANI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

34 C.A. No. 7334/2010XII

ARUCHAMY GOUNDER @ARUMUGHAM(D)TH:LR AND ORS. V. BALACHANDRAN[P-1]

VersusM. BALASUBRAMANIAM VIKAS MEHTA[R-1]and IA No.92110/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.92111/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

35 C.A. No. 550/2016III-A

STATE OF UP THR. SECRETARY ANDORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[P-1]

Versus

PRAHALAD KUMAR AND ORS. MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.[R-1], SUNNYCHOUDHARY[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 551/2016III-A

STATE OF U.P. REVENUE DEPARTMENTTHROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

Versus

AMAR SINGH (DEAD) AND ORS.

SONAL JAIN[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], [R-7], [R-10], [R-11], [R-12], [R-13], [R-14],[R-15], [R-16], [R-17], [R-19], [R-21], [R-22],[R-23], [R-24], MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF[R-8],[R-18]

ConnectedC.A. No. 552/2016III-A

STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARYAND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[P-1]

VersusGRAM UDYOG SANSTHAN THROUGHITS CHAIRMAN BHAGWAN DAS (DEAD)THR. LRS. AND ORS.

MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.[R-1], SUNNYCHOUDHARY[R-5]

FOR FOR ON IA 8/2015 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 9/2015 FORAPPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 88370/2019 FOR CONDONATION OFDELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 88371/2019 FOR SETTING ASIDEAN ABATEMENT ON IA 88372/2019 FOR APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OFDELAY IN FILING THE APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT ONIA 88374/2019

ConnectedC.A. No. 553/2016III-A

STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARYAND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[P-1]

Versus

Page 6: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7MAHESH CHAND AND ANR. AMIT DAYAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 555/2016III-A

STATE OF U.P. REVENUE DEPARTMENTTHROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[P-1]

VersusM/S BHARAT LIME INDUSTRY AND ORS. MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.[R-1]

36 C.A. No. 8070/2010IV-A

GOVT. TOOL ROOM AND TRAININGCENTRE S. N. BHAT[P-1]

VersusH.N. YOGA RAJAN AND ANR. NARESH KUMAR[R-1]

37 Crl.A. No. 811/2011II-C

NAGOOR PICHAI @ BADUSHA VIPIN KUMAR JAIVersusTHE STATE THROUGH SUB INSPECTOROF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

38 Crl.A. No. 1380/2012II-A

MD. ASLAM JAIL PETITION[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR GOPAL SINGH[R-1]Mr. Sanjay Mani Tripathi, Advocate is NOR Amicus curiae

39 C.A. No. 4749/2011XII

P.P.RATHI V. BALACHANDRANVersusARULMIGU MALLIGESWARARTHIRUKOIL AND ORS. AND ORS. R. SATHISH

40 Crl.A. No.1663-1664/2015II

ANIL KUMAR RAJEEV SINGH[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHPRADEEP MISRA[R-1], ANKUR YADAV[R-2],YADAV NARENDER SINGH[R-4], [R-5], [R-6],EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[R-3], [R-8], [R-9],[R-10]

ONLY IA No.110881/2017- APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION FOR VACATION OFSTAY TO BE LISTED IN CRL.A. NO. 1663-64/2015 ONLY ON 01.05.2018

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1665-1666/2015II

ANIL KUMAR RAJEEV SINGH[P-1]

Versus

RIZWAN . AND ORS. PRADEEP MISRA[R-2], EQUITY LEXASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-3]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1667-1668/2015II

ANIL KUMAR RAJEEV SINGH[P-1]

Versus

BADRUDDIN . AND ORS. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-3],PRADEEP MISRA[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1669/2015II

ANIL KUMAR DHAKA RAJEEV SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDANR.

PRADEEP MISRA[R-1], EQUITY LEXASSOCIATES[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1670/2015II

ANIL KUMAR RAJEEV SINGH[P-1]

Versus

WASEEM AND ANR. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[R-1], PRADEEPMISRA[R-2]

41 C.A. No.1137-1138/2011IV

ZILE SINGH ETC. AND ANR. RISHI MALHOTRA

Versus

CHATTER SINGH (DEAD) THR. LRS. ANDORS.

(MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA, VINOD SHARMA[R-1.4],[R-1.3], [R-1.2], [R-1.1], [R-8.3], [R-8.2], [R-8.1],[R-8.6], [R-8.5], [R-8.4]

Page 7: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 742 Crl.A. No. 2418/2010

II-CC.VILVANATHAN SANGEETA KUMARVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

43 Crl.A. No. 2035/2011II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusNIRBHAY SINGH IRSHAD AHMAD[R-2]

44 C.A. No. 7580/2012XI-A

PRAKASAN M.P.. AND ORS. A. RAGHUNATH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],SANAND RAMAKRISHNAN[P-6], [P-7], [P-8]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA . AND ANR. G. PRAKASH[R-1]

45 C.A. No. 10766/2011III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH COLLECTOR AND ANR. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

NANWA (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ANR. S. R. SETIA[R-1], SUDHIRKULSHRESHTHA[R-2]

46 Crl.A. No. 191/2011II-C

K.RAJENDRAN V. RAMASUBRAMANIANVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

47 C.A. No.1869-1871/2018XII

BALASUNDARAM AND ORS. AND ORS. VIPIN NAIR[P-1][PR], [P-2][PR], [P-3][PR]

VersusRAMALINGAM AND ORS. AND ORS.ADVOCATE NAME: MR. VIPIN NAIR(FOR PETITIONER)

48 C.A. No. 97-98/2012XIV-A

INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURALRESEARCH THROUGH THE DIRECTORGENERAL AND ANR.

PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

RAJINDER SINGH . AND ORS. SUDARSHAN RAJAN[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], [R-9]

49 C.A. No. 11196/2011IV-A

STATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPURVersusA.G.D. REDDY S. N. BHAT

50 Crl.A. No. 233/2013II-B

BISHNUPADA DUTTA AND ANR. RANJAN MUKHERJEEVersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

51 C.A. No. 3927/2018XII-A

G. MADHUSUDHANA PRASAD AND ORS.

V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1], [P-2][PR], [P-3][PR],[P-4][PR], [P-5][PR], [P-6][PR], [P-7][PR],[P-8][PR], [P-9][PR], [P-10][PR], [P-11][PR],[P-12][PR], [P-13][PR], [P-14][PR], [P-15][PR],[P-16][PR], [P-17][PR], [P-18][PR], [P-19][PR],[P-20][PR], [P-21][PR]

Versus

M. LAKXMIKANT AND ORS.G. N. REDDY[R-1], [R-6][GR], [R-7][GR],VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-6]SADINENI RAVI KUMAR[I-1][IMPL],[I-2][IMPL], [I-3][IMPL]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3930/2018XII-A

N. VIJAY KUMAR C. K. RAI[P-1]

Versus

G. MOHAN REDDY AND ORS. ABHIJIT SENGUPTA[R-1], G. N. REDDY[R-6],VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-7]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3928/2018XII-A

P.V.RAMAPATHI RAO AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Versus

GOVERNMENT OF A.P. AND ORS. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR, VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES[R-1]

Page 8: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 3929/2018XII-A

M.B. HEMLATHA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Versus

M. LAXMIKANTH AND ORS. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR[R-6][GR], [R-7][GR],VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-6], [R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3931/2018XII-A

K.ANANTHA REDDY AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]

Versus

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESHAND ORS.

GUNTUR PRABHAKAR[R-1][GR], [R-2][PR],VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-1],[R-2], [R-2], ANIS AHMED KHAN[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3932/2018XII-A

M.PENCHALA RAJU AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]

Versus

M.LAXMIKANTH AND ORS.G. N. REDDY, SADINENI RAVI KUMAR[R-1], C.S. N. MOHAN RAO[R-1], GUNTURPRABHAKAR[R-6][GR], [R-7][GR], VENKATPALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-6]

FOR ON IA 11/2014 (Application for impleadment FILED BY MR. C.S.N. MOHANRAO)

52 C.A. No. 6640/2013III-A

VIKAS JAINVersusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

53 C.A. No. 3795/2012XII

AROCKIAMARY AND ORS. AND ORS. V. BALACHANDRANVersusKULANDAIAMMAL AND ORS. AND ORS. P. V. YOGESWARAN, SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA

54 C.A. No. 11341/2013XIV-A

SHANKAR KUMAR T. L. GARGVersusRAM NARAIN AND ANR. PAHLAD SINGH SHARMA, VISHWA PAL SINGH

55 C.A. No.5785-5788/2011III-A

SHAUKAT NARESH KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7]

VersusSTATE OF U.P. . AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2]

56 C.A. No. 652/2019XII

S.GAJAGANAPATHY RAKESH K. SHARMAVersusS.RATHINASABABATHY (DEAD) THR LRSAND ORS AND ORS. SUMIT KUMAR, S. R. SETIA[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 653/2019XII

SHANKAR P. N. RAMALINGAM

VersusS.RATHINASABABATHY (DEAD)THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. SUMIT KUMAR, S. R. SETIA

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/201257 Crl.A. No. 1627/2013

II-BMAHENDRABHAI NATHABHAI RAVAL DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

58 C.A. No. 6213/2016IV

TRUST MANDIR THAKUR RAMLACCHAMN JI MAHRAJ ARJUN SINGH BHATI

Versus

PURAN (D) THR. LRS. . AND ORS. A. N. ARORA, RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI,KRISHAN KUMAR, SHILPA SINGH[R-5]

59 Crl.A. No. 1265/2012II-C

T.G.KRISHNAMURTHY. AND ORS. AMAN MOHIT HINGORANIVersusSTATE OF KARNATAKATHROUGHTARIKERE POLICE AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

60 C.A. No. 5859/2012IV

OM PRAKASH AMAN MOHIT HINGORANIVersus

Page 9: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

61 C.A. No. 356/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4578/2015IV-A

M/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101664/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No. 4583/2015IV-A

M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM, [P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX . ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101644/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No. 4577/2015IV-A

M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4582/2015IV-A

M/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

and IA No.101655/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No. 4585/2015IV-A

M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX .AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101658/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7567/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TAX CBUILDING AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101669/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7566/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT. LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.List alongwith C.A. No. 356 of 2017

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 6464/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ADVANTA LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.106019/2017-XTRA

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3547/2016IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT. LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.[P-1]

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR], [R-2][GR]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3705/2016IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

Page 10: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(OSD) ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3703/2016IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3804/2016IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(OSD) ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3789/2016IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3624/2016IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4579/2015IV-A

M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE 11(4) AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101667/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No. 4584/2015IV-A

M/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX .AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101654/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 9949/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - IBANGALORE . AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101686/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 11727/2015IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101675/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedC.A. No. 361-363/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusC.I.T. AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 357/2015IV-A

M/S. INDO AMERICAL EXPORTS SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusC.I.T. AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 366-367/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

Page 11: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 358-360/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 374-376/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 368-373/2015IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 379/2015III

C.I.T-VIII MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 387/2015III

C.I.T 8 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 380/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX V ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. THROUGHITS MANAGER RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 381/2015III

COMM. OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. THROUGHITS MANAGER RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 386/2015III

COMM. OF INCOME TAX VIII ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusMONOSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 389/2015IV-A

M/S INDO AMERICAN EXPORTS SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7558/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ADVANTA LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101679/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 19939/2015IV-A

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3505/2016IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

Page 12: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26688/2019IX

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LIMITED RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.165232/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 2253/2020IX

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 10 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.879/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.880/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURINGTHE DEFECTS

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7854/2020IX

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 10 MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LIMITED RAHUL GUPTA[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.42708/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

62 C.A. No. 9289/2013III

B.P. SINGH RAHUL KAUSHIKVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

63 Crl.A. No. 1179/2012II-B

NARENDRASINH KESHUBHAI ZALA RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA[P-1][SCLSC]VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

64 C.A. No. 1537/2016XII

R.JANKIAMMAL VIKAS MEHTAVersus

S.K.KUMARASWAMY (D) THR.LRS. ANDORS.

SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY, S. RAVI SHANKAR,PRABHA SWAMI, K. V. MOHAN, PALLAVILANGAR[R-2], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1538/2016XII

S.R. SOMASUNDARAM AND ANR. S. RAVI SHANKAR, GAURAV AGRAWAL

VersusS.K.KUJMARASWAMY (D) THRU LRS. .AND ORS. AND ORS.

SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY, VIKAS MEHTA, K.V. MOHAN

FOR FOR ON IA 5/2017 FOR [BRINGING ON RECORD LRS] ON IA 90850/201865 C.A. No. 6610/2015

XVILAKHAN SAO(D) THR. HIS L.RS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersus

PARWATI DEVI . AND ORS. BANKEY BIHARI SHARMA, SUBHASISHBHOWMICK

66 Crl.A. No. 759/2013II-B

SAMABHAI RAMSUBHAI KISHORI MANISHA T. KARIA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]REF; HON'BLE COURT ORDER DATED 06.06.2019 LIST THE MATTER AFTERVACATION

67 Crl.A. No.905-908/2013II

NANHE SINGH . AND ORS. KRISHNA PAL SINGH

VersusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND JATINDER KUMAR BHATIAand IA No.88592/2017-I/A FOR BAIL and IA No.88596/2017-EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. and IA No.126819/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IANo.16996/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

68 C.A. No.10423-10424/2017IV-A

H.M.SHIVANNA(D) BY LRS. AND ANR.AND ANR. BALAJI SRINIVASAN

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.AND ORS.

ANKUR S. KULKARNI, V. N. RAGHUPATHY,VAIJAYANTHI GIRISH

Page 13: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7IA NO. 152152/2019(FOR DIRECTION) IN CA 10423-24/2017 ONLY TO BE LISTEDBEFORE THE HON'BLE COURT

69 Crl.A. No. 1290/2012II

MAHAVEER SINGH MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

70 C.A. No. 11161/2017IV-A

GURUSHANTAYYA ANIL KUMARVersusGOURAVVA AND ORS. TULIKA PRAKASH, ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

ConnectedC.A. No. 11162/2017IV-A

NEELAKANTAYYA TULIKA PRAKASH

VersusGURUSHANTAYYA AND ORS. ANIL KUMAR, AFTAB ALI KHAN

71 Crl.A. No.148-151/2014II

ANJUM KHAN SHAKEEL AHMED[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETRY

P. NARASIMHAN[R-1], [R-2], AJAY VIKRAMSINGH[R-1]

72 C.A. No. 5921/2014XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SHAKEEL AHMED[P-1]Versus

K. KAJNA . AND ORS. P. NARASIMHAN[R-1], [R-2], AJAY VIKRAMSINGH[R-1]

73 C.A. No. 15150/2017XIV-A

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROYVersus

MUKUT RANJAN SARMA . AND ORS.

SHAILESH MADIYAL, [R-6], [R-7], [R-10],[R-11], RAHUL PRATAP[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], [R-8], [R-9], [R-13], [R-14], [R-15], [R-16],[R-17], [R-18], [R-19], [R-20], [R-21], [R-22],[R-23], [R-24], [R-25], [R-26], [R-27], [R-28],[R-29], [R-30], [R-31], [R-32], [R-33], [R-34],[R-35], [R-36], [R-37], [R-38], [R-39], [R-40]

74 C.A. No.6776-6777/2013III

KAZI AKILODDIN HIMANSHU CHAUBEY[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 21611/2018IX

KAZI AKILODDIN SUJAODDIN HIMANSHU CHAUBEY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS. SACHIN PATIL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 111846/2018 FOR PERMISSION TOFILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 186395/2019 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 186396/2019

75 C.A. No. 8772/2013III

SHIVAJI RAMCHANDRA SAWANT ABHA R. SHARMA[P-1]VersusDINESH RAMCHANDRA SAWANT ANDORS. S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY[R-1], [R-2]

76 Crl.A. No. 1122/2017II-A

NANDESHWAR KUMAR SUBHRO SANYAL[P-1]Versus

RAJENDRA PRASAD PANDEY AND ORS. KUMAR MIHIR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],SANTOSH KUMAR - I[R-6]

77 C.A. No. 9884/2013XI-A

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. C. K. SASIVersusK. BHANAMMA VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R

ConnectedC.A. No. 9885/2013XI-A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. C. K. SASI[P-1]

Versus

Page 14: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7P.M.ANTONY VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 33132/2015XI-A

STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. C. K. SASI

VersusSAJITHA P.M. . AND ANR.

78 W.P.(C) No. 984/2013PIL-W

TELANGANA VIKAS KENDRA MANOJ C. MISHRA[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. C. K. SUCHARITA[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 289/2014PIL-W

P.R. KRISHNAN AND ANR. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1], M. A.CHINNASAMY[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS.

ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], DEBOJIT BORKAKATI[R-3], [R-4],ASWATHI M.K.[R-5], SUMEET LALL[R-6],ASHOK KUMAR SINGH[R-7], P. V.YOGESWARAN[R-8], ANINDITA PUJARI[R-9],UTTARA BABBAR[R-10], RUCHI KOHLI[R-11],GOPAL SINGH[R-12], RAJIV NANDA[R-13],PARIJAT SINHA[R-14]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 210/2014PIL-W

MANOHAR LAL SHARMA ADVOCATE PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], GUNTURPRABHAKAR[R-2], S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-3]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 271/2014PIL-W

K.K SHERWANI R. C. KAUSHIK[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1471/2017XII-A

D.SURAYANARAYANA AND ORS. K. SARADA DEVI

VersusGOVT. OF INIDA SUSHMA SURI, D. BHARATHI REDDY

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 456/2014PIL-W

VISHNU ALLURI

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SUSHMA SURI[R-1]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 344/2014PIL-W

BANDI SREEKANTH & 3 ORS CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI

VersusUOI AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 470/2014PIL-W

DR.M.SHARATH CHANDRA REDDY VIPIN KUMAR JAI

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 166/2014PIL-W

M. RAJAMOHAN REDDY SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-3]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 275/2014PIL-W

B. SANJEEVA RAO PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-2], S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-4]

Page 15: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 306/2014PIL-W

CHANAMOLU LAKSHMI ANUPAMA ANDORS. R. NEDUMARAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], SUSHMA SURI[R-1],S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-4]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 742/2014PIL-W

HARITHA SARANGA AND ORS. AND ORS. V. K. MONGA

VersusUNION OF INDIA GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 804/2014PIL-W

MUTTEEVI VENKATAPPA LAKSHMI ANDORS. P. VINAY KUMAR

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI, S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR,GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 132/2018PIL-W

PONGULETI SUDHAKAR REDDY D. MAHESH BABU

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-3], GURMEETSINGH MAKKER[R-4], B. V. BALARAMDAS[R-5], [R-6], ANIL KATIYAR[R-7], S.. UDAYAKUMAR SAGAR[R-8], GUNTURPRABHAKAR[R-9]AMIT K. NAIN[IMPL]APPLICANT-IN-PERSON[INT]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 203/2014PIL-W

M. GOPI KRISHNA

VersusUNION OF INDIA SUSHMA SURI, CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 215/2014PIL-W

PENDURTHI VENKATESH A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIAB. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], SUSHMA SURI[R-1],CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], S.. UDAYAKUMAR SAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 211/2014PIL-W

KARNATAKA TELUGU PRAJA SAMITHI NARESH KUMAR[P-1]

Versus

U.O.I. AND ANR. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], C. K. SUCHARITA[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 217/2014PIL-W

MATTEGUNTA RAMAKRISHNA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], SUSHMASURI[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 218/2014PIL-W

K. PRABHAKAR RAJU AND ANR. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 219/2014PIL-W

VUNDAVALLI ARUN KUMAR PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Versus

UOI AND ANR. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], G. N. REDDY[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 223/2014PIL-W

MUPPALLA SUBBARAO AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

UOI AND ANR. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-2]

Page 16: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 224/2014PIL-W

RASTHRIYA PRAJA CONGRESS(SECULAR) A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.B. KRISHNA PRASAD, SUSHMA SURI[R-1],CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], S.. UDAYAKUMAR SAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 225/2014PIL-W

RAYAPATI SAMBASIVA RAO AND ANR. ANNAM D. N. RAO[P-1]

Versus

UOI AND ORS. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-4]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 228/2014PIL-W

NALLARI KIRAN KUMAR REDDY ANDORS. ANNAM D. N. RAO[P-1]

Versus

UOI AND ORS. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-4]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 230/2014PIL-W

MATTA JAYAKAR AND ANR. M. VIJAYA BHASKAR[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], D. MAHESH BABU[R-2], C. K.SUCHARITA[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 207/2014PIL-W

VISHNU ALLURI AND ANR. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.RAJESH SRIVASTAVA[R-1], CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], AMIT SHARMA[R-1], S.. UDAYAKUMAR SAGAR[R-5]

FOR FOR ON IA 5/2017 FOR ON IA 7/2017 and IA No.86398/2017-impleading partyand IA No.86412/2017-PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW AN IA

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 161/2014PIL-W

K. RAGHU RAMAKRISHNA RAJU ANDANR. N. RAJARAMAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-2], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-4]

Office Report for Directions

79 Crl.A. No.278-279/2016II-A

BHUNESHWAR YADAV AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEY[P-1]

Versus

NIRMAL SINGH AND ORS. SHANTANU SAGAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], [R-5],NIRANJANA SINGH[R-3]

80 C.A. No. 7364/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH[P-1]Versus

SHYAMA NANDAN MISHRA SHARMILA UPADHYAY[R-1], AKHILESHKUMAR PANDEY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7371/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH[P-1]

Versus

SARWAR AKRAM KHAN AND ORS. SATYAJEET KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], DIVYA ROY[R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7373/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH[P-1]

VersusKARUNESH KUMAR AND ORS. SHANTANU SAGAR[R-1], DIVYA ROY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7365/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR GOPAL SINGH[P-1]

Versus

SUBHAS CHANDRA SINGH SATYAJEET KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], [R-6]

Page 17: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 7368/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH[P-1]

VersusJAYA TIWARY DIVYA ROY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7374/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH[P-1]

VersusPRABIN CHANDRA SINGH SHANTANU SAGAR[R-1]

81 C.A. No. 5943/2014III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHMEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES THR.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS.

ANKIT GOEL[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusDR. OM PRAKASH AGGARWAL

82 Crl.A. No.2314-2319/2014II-A

SHIV SHANKAR SAHI CHANDRA PRAKASH[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1], SUBHROSANYAL[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

83 C.A. No. 6815/2014III-A

U.P. RAJKIYA NIRMAN NIGAM LIMITED TUSHAR BAKSHIVersusL.N. GUPTA

84 Crl.A. No. 1856/2014II-C

RAHIL AND ANR. MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF[P-1]VersusSTATE(GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 927/2015II-C

SURAIYA MUSHTAQ AHMAD

VersusSTATE OF (GOVERNMENT OF N.C.T. OFDELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

85 Crl.A. No. 1039/2015II-B

OM PARKASH SINGH ANIS AHMED KHAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

86 C.A. No. 9735/2016III

NAGPUR SHIKSHAN MANDAL AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersus

VARSHA VINOD SAYAM AND ANR. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,ANAGHA S. DESAI

ConnectedC.A. No. 9734/2016III

NAGPUR SHIKSHAN MANDAL AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Versus

NANDA WAKDE AND ANR. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,ANAGHA S. DESAI

87 C.A. No. 1443/2017XIV-A

ROSHAN LAL GUPTA (DEAD) THROUGHLRS. PIYUSH SHARMA[P-1.4], [P-1.3], [P-1.2], [P-1.1]

VersusIDBI BANK LIMITED AND ANR. RABIN MAJUMDER

88 Crl.A. No. 334/2015II-A

SATISH PURUSHOTTAM AUSHAL ANDANR. ANAGHA S. DESAI[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 18856/2016

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 1306/2015II-A

VILAS PURUSHOTTAM AUSHAL ANAGHA S. DESAI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

Page 18: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7

89 Crl.A. No. 106/2018II-C

MALTI @ K.S. PRIYA @ SHANTI @PREMKUMARI AND ANR. KAMINI JAISWAL[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1][GR]

90 C.A. No. 9879/2017XV

THE INDIAN HUME PIPE CO. LTD. AMARJIT SINGH BEDIVersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.FINANCE DEPARTMENT SECRETARY TOGOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

MATTER RESTORE BY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN AND HON'BLEMR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA ON 15.07.2019

ConnectedC.A. No.9880-9886/2017XV

THE INDIAN HUME PIPE CO. LTD. AMARJIT SINGH BEDI

Versus

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN . AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No.9887-9891/2017XV

INDIAN HUME PIPE CO. LTD. AMARJIT SINGH BEDI

Versus

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.FINANCE DEPARTMENT SECRETARYAND ORS.

MILIND KUMAR

91 C.A. No. 5780/2015XV

IRSHAD(D)THROUGH LRS. SHOBHA GUPTA[P-1]VersusSHARAFAT HUSSAIN PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1]

92 Crl.A. No. 828/2015II-A

SANJAY VITHHAL PACHAGHARE B. K. PAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

93 Crl.A. No. 1203/2015II-B

RAKESH KUMAR SINGH VIVEK NARAYAN SHARMA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

94 C.A. No. 132/2016XIV-A

CANON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAOVersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 145/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD KISHORE KUNAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 138/2016XIV-A

SONY ERICSSON MOBILECOMMUNICATION INDIA PVT. LTD.(NOW MERGED WITH SONY INDIA PVTLTD)

AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 136/2016XIV-A

CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[P-1]

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 3(1) ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 139/2016XIV-A

CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD. KISHORE KUNAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

Page 19: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 141/2016XIV-A

CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD. THR. MASAONAKA, MD KISHORE KUNAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 140/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

M/S. CANNON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO, ANIL KUMARGAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 143/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHIVersusM/S DAIKIN AIR-CONDITIONING INDIAPVT. LTD. ANIL KATIYAR, , ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 2668/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. HAIER APPLICANCES INDIA PVT.LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 142/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VNEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S REEBOK INDIA COMPANY LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 4412/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -IVNEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHAIER APPLIANCES INDIA PVT LTD

ConnectedC.A. No. 17811/2017XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE INDIAPVT LTD PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22239/2019XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SONY INDIA PVT. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.134327/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.134329/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.134326/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 15803/2019XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SONY INDIA PVT LTDIA No.94691/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 1775/2020XIV-A

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTOSHIBA INDIA PVT. LTD. NEERAJ KUMAR GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1632/2020XIV-A

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHAIER APPLIANCES INDIA LIMTIED

ConnectedDiary No. 7356-2020XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 20: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7M/S AVERY DENNISON (INDIA) PVT.LTD.FOR FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 41803/2020

ConnectedC.A. No. 137/2016XIV-A

CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[P-1]

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 3(1) NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

FOR PERMISSION TO PLACE ADDITIONAL FACTS AND GROUNDS ON IA102664/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20829/2018XV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GILLETTE INDIA LTD. TARUN GUPTA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.76572/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.76573/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 17094/2018XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMAKE MY TRIP INDIA PVT. LTD SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 135/2016XIV-A

SONY ERICSSON MOBILECOMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT.LTD.(NOW) MERGED WITH SONY INDIA PVTLTD) NEW DELHI

AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 151/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. DAIKIN AIR - CONDITIONING INDIAPVT. LTD. ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 148/2016XIV-A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 3 (1) NEW DEHI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5909/2016XIV-A

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusHONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 5904/2016XIV-A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA)PVT. LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 21852/2017XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 19984/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1826/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD.IA No.14992/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

Page 21: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedDiary No. 10952-2018XIV

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVALVOLINE CUMMINS PVT. LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4652/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAVERY DENNISON (INDIA) PVT. LTD.

ConnectedDiary No. 13295-2018XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVALVOLINE CUMMINS PVT. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.55855/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.55856/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20837/2018XV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GILLETTE INDIA LTD DIRECTOR TARUN GUPTA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.86519/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 2669/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S HAIER APPLIANCES INDIA PVT.LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 144/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SHARP BUSINESS SYSTEMS INDIALTD. POOJA DHAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 146/2016XIV-A

REEBOK INDIA COMPANY LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 3937/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDISCOVERY COMMUNICATION INDIA SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 149/2016XIV-A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 521/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. AMADEUS INDIA PVT. LTD. SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 527/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTOSHIBA INDIA PVT. LTD. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 526/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI - 8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SHARPA BUSINESS SYSTEM(INDIA) PVT. LTD. POOJA DHAR

Page 22: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 152/2016XIV-A

REEBOK INDIA COMPANY KAVITA JHA

VersusADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 1219/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2703/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE 3(1) ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4808/2016XIV-A

HAIER APPLIANCES (INDIA ) P. LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 5024/2016XIV-A

HAIER APPLIANCES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 4809/2016XIV-A

HAIER APPLIANCES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

ConnectedC.A. No.5905-5906/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA)PVT. LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 5903/2016XIV-A

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA)PVT. LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6485/2016XIV-A

THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX RANGE 2 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA )PVT LTD PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 3953/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 3954/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.11110-11111/2016XIV-A

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMARand FOR AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 119430/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 5514/2017XIV-A

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-09 ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 23: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7M/S TOSHIBA INDIA PVT LTD AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8403/2017XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX DELHI-2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BOSE CORPORATION INDIA PVTLTD HARISH PANDEY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11201/2017XIV-A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLE PASSAGE TO INDIA TOURS ANDTRAVELS (P) LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1]

IA No.80934/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.80937/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No. 15498/2017XIV-A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLE PASSAGE TO INDIA TOURS ANDTRAVELS (P) LTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.13384-13385/2018XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

AMADEUS INDIA PVT LTD SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA64556/2018

ConnectedC.A. No. 9624/2018XV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXALWAR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GILLETTE INDIA LTD. TARUN GUPTA[R-1]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118233/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES ON IA118234/2018

95 C.A. No. 10433/2016III

SMT. SUSHILABAI TUKARAM PATIL ANDANR. SACHIN PATIL

VersusSUBHASH KAKASAHEB PATIL . ANDORS. S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY

96 Crl.A. No.1410-1412/2015II-A

RAJKUMAR SHASHIBHUSHAN P. ADGAONKAR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA POLICESTATON INCHARGE AND ORS. SACHIN PATIL[R-1], AMOL B. KARANDE[R-2]

ConnectedSLP(Crl.)...CRLMP No.4705-4706/2016II-A

LAXMAN S/O DADARAO KARANDE AMOL B. KARANDE

Versus

RAJKUMAR AND ANR.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1823/2017II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[P-1]

VersusRAJKUMAR

97 Crl.A. No.1419-1420/2015II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[P-1]

VersusRAMESH JIJEBA LAHANE MANJU JETLEY[R-1]MR. MAHABIR SINGH, SENIOR ADVOCATE APPOINTED AS AMICUS CURIAE TOASSIST THE HON. COURT IN THE INSTANT MATTER

Page 24: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7

98 C.A. No.21828-21831/2017XII

M.R. SRINIVASAN AND ORS. ETC. ANDORS. GAGAN GUPTA[P-1]

VersusASSOCIATION OF TAMIL NADUHIGHWAYS ENGINEERS AND ORS. ETC.

PRANAV SACHDEVA[R-1], VINODH KANNAB.[R-2], K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-3][GR]

99 Crl.A. No. 616/2016II

DHARAMPAL AND ANR. VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH RUCHIRA GOEL[R-1], FARRUKHRASHEED[R-1]

and IA No.7690/2018-BAIL APPLICATION100 C.A. No. 7257/2016

III-AVIPIN KUMAR SINGH YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P THR. PRINCIPALSECRETARY . AND ORS.

GARIMA PRASHAD[R-1], TANMAYAAGARWAL[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7258/2016III-A

SHRAVAN KUMAR ASHA GOPALAN NAIR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

KRISHNANAND PANDEYA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],VINAY GARG[R-4]

and IA No.105549/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.101 C.A. No. 6122/2016

XVISAHID ALIM AND ORS. AND ORS. CHANDRA PRAKASHVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. ANDORS. SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

102 C.A. No. 7397/2016III-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusGAJENDRA TEWARI ANURAG KISHORE[R-1]

103 Crl.A. No. 44/2017II-C

MOHD. VAKIL AFTAB ALI KHAN[P-1]VersusSTATE(GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

104 Crl.A. No. 1078/2017II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusRAMESH ANIS AHMED KHAN[R-1]

105 Crl.A. No. 1229/2017II-C

CHAMAN LAL RADHIKA GAUTAM[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AJAY MARWAH[R-1][GR]HEARING EXPEDITED VIDE HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 21.07.2018 AND04.07.2018.FOR FINAL ARGUMENTS AND DISPOSAL VIDE HON'BLE COURT'SORDER DATED 04.07.2018.

106 C.A. No. 4934/2017III

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusADANI ENTERPRISES LTD TARUNA SINGH GOHIL[R-1]

107 C.A. No. 82/2019III

SURAT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MUNAWWAR NASEEM[P-1]VersusGAURAV KANVAR JUNEJA AND ORS. RUPESH KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

108 Crl.A. No. 1730/2017II-B

VINOBHAI M. P. VINODVersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

109 Crl.A. No. 1801/2017II-A

THE STATE OF BIHAR NIRANJANA SINGH[P-1]VersusKAMESHWAR PRASAD YADAV ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY[R-1]

110 Crl.A. No. 1537/2017II-B

JAYRAJSINH TEMUBHA JADEJA R. C. KOHLI[P-1]Versus

Page 25: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7

THE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]RAHUL GUPTA[I-1][IMPL]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1538/2017II-B

AMARJITSINH ANIRUDHDHSINH JADEJAAND ANR. E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]RAHUL GUPTA[I-1][IMPL]

111 Crl.A. No. 132/2018II-C

SHRI DEEPAK SRIVASTAV RITESH KUMAR CHOWDHARYVersusTHE STATE OF DELHI B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 133/2018II-C

RAJENDER SRIVASTAV RITESH KUMAR CHOWDHARY

VersusSTATE OF DELHI B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

112 C.A. No. 2201/2018IV-A

ASHOK KUMAR GOYAL AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAINVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS. B. S. BANTHIA[CAVEAT], ARJUN GARG[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2202/2018IV-A

ASHOK KUMAR GOYAL AND ANR. CHRISTI JAIN

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS. B. S. BANTHIA[CAVEAT], ARJUN GARG[R-1]

FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA159123/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 159125/2018

ConnectedC.A. No.4533-4534/2019IV-A

FIRM M/S GWALIOR LAND DEALS ANDFINANCE THROUGH PARTNER HARISHANKAR GOYAL(DEAD) THROUGH LRS

CHRISTI JAIN

VersusSURESH KUMAR AND ORS. ABHINAV RAMKRISHNA[R-4.1]

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.1072/2018 in C.A. No.2201/2018IV-A

ASHOK KUMAR GOYAL AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAIN

Versus

ABHAY CHAUDHARY AND ORS. B. S. BANTHIA[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], [R-5]

IN C.A. No. - 2201/2018,ConnectedC.A. No. 722-723/2020IV-A

SURESH KUMAR ABHINAV RAMKRISHNA

VersusFIRM M/S GWALIOR LAND DEALS ANDFINANCE, LASHKAR AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.6356/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.6358/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IANo.6357/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS

113 Crl.A. No. 404/2018II-C

ARUN KUMAR AMIT AGRAWALVersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 405/2018II-C

ARUN KUMAR AMIT AGRAWAL

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.31495/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP

114 C.A. No. 4418/2018XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFWEALTH TAX, I NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 26: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2020. 9. 4. · m. yogesh kanna, vinodh kanna b.[r-2] 3 c.a. no. 6077/2009 iv-a guruwari bai satish pandey[p-1] versus jagdish

COURT NO. : 7M/S ORIENTAL BUILDING ANDFURNISHING CO. LTD MANAGINGDIRECTORFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.54053/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.54056/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No. 4417/2018XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFWEALTH TAX 1 DELHI TA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ORIENTAL BUILDING ANDFURNISHING CO. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.54114/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.54115/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

115 C.A. No. 8989/2018III

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX AHMEDABAD ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NIRMA LIMITED MOHIT D. RAM[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 27976/2018III

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S NIRMA LIMITED MOHIT D. RAM[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9815/2018III

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX AHMEDABAD ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NIRMA LIMITED MOHIT D. RAM

116 C.A. No. 2760/2010XIV-A

INDIAN BANK AND ANR. MADHU SIKRI, [P-2]VersusMAHAVEER KHARIWAL VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU{Fixed Date by Court for 09-09-2020 }

117 Crl.A. No. 900/2010II-C

SHANMUGAM V. RAMASUBRAMANIANVersusSTATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA{Fixed Date by Court for 09-09-2020 }

NEW DELHI04-09-2020 18:02:54

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR