It is the supreme art of the teacher to awaken joy in...
Transcript of It is the supreme art of the teacher to awaken joy in...
GWP
It is the supreme art of the teacher to awaken joy in
creative expression and knowledge.
- Albert Einstein Hello! My name is Ms. Kaitlyn Smugala and I will be your professor for the upcoming
school year! I will currently be teaching Honors English IV and English II. I graduated
from the University of Missouri in Saint Louis with a bachelor’s degree in English, a
bachelor’s degree in Secondary Education with an emphasis in English, and a certificate
in Gender Studies. While completing my degrees, I was a scholar athlete on the
Women’s Soccer team at UMSL. I attended high school in the area, Parkway South
High, and have wanted to remain teaching here in Saint Louis. My favorite things to do
include curling up somewhere in nature and just read, playing in the mud on the soccer
field, and watching movies from my vast collection of hundreds!
Here is a picture of me and my wonderful puppy!
I look forward to meeting each and everyone one of you and I encourage you to contact
me before the year starts or after receiving the syllabus. My contact information is as
follows:
Kaitlyn Smugala [email protected]
314-346-0993
Let’s get ready for a great year!
GWP
Kaitlyn Smugala
Professor Donna Wadsworth-Brown
ENGL 4880: 001
27 February 2013
An Educational Calling
Nothing in my childhood indicated that my life’s passion and calling would be in
the professional education field. Growing up I was frequently referred to as that ‘little
demon child’. I lacked patience, dedication and commitment to anything other than
soccer and reading, and frequently ignored my studies because I was too ‘cool’ for an
education. Often times, my parents would have to force me to sit down and complete
homework assignments, particularly in science and mathematics (even though I never
struggled in any courses at any point in my life). However, if the assignment dealt with
reading and/or writing, nothing could stop me from working on it at inappropriate times.
I thirsted for new knowledge, yet I was only partially willing to work hard for it. I
remember being asked questions– “What do you want to be when you grew up? – and
ironically, I wanted to be an astronomer. Becoming a teacher never occurred to me
because, I am ashamed to say, the occupation seemed beneath my intelligence.
This changed however one fateful day when I was requested by a teacher to assist
a student with his final examination in a class which he was failing. He needed an A to
pass the class with a C, an impressive feat to accomplish. My loathing for the situation
could not have been overstated. Our differences extended anywhere from extreme
religious differences to simple personality clashes. However, working through the test
with him taught me so much about working one on one with students, seeing a positive
GWP
result, and I learned that everyone has their own cultural differences and experiences
which contribute to my own understanding of the world; this last one in particular hit
home with me. When I learned that not only did he receive an A on the test, I
remembered that he did so by using his own knowledge. I simply slowed him down and
forced him to work through the problems. The feeling of simply making a difference in
my classmate’s life sealed the deal and I knew where my calling lay.
Once I officially decided on my career prospects in the educational field, making
a decision on which subject was to be my particular calling was easier than words can
express. As far as personal experience goes, no one who knew me as a child could have
overestimated my love and desire for the English language and everything that
encompasses. I found myself immersed in the world of language and beauty and could
not tear myself away. All too frequently I would be sent to bed only to be discovered
under the covers with a flashlight falling in love with a macho, masculine hero or battling
the unseen shadows. I read books like I swallowed food, huge portions at a time.
Sometimes I read multiple books at a time, though usually I would dedicate an entire day
to complete a single novel. My addiction began as a child when my mother would read
to me at night before bedtime. This ritual quickly became an obsession, and an obsession
into a life’s passion. By the beginning of middle school I would frequent college
bookstores looking for a challenge: Uncle Tom’s Cabin was just the tip of the iceberg. I
was impatient to begin the next new challenge and constantly pushed myself to learn
more, experience more, and do more.
I have discovered that my personality attributes to my teaching style in a major
way. Because I constantly pushed myself to work harder and do better I want to push the
GWP
limitations of students and see how far they can go and how much they can accomplish
on their own. Growing up, I learned best when I had a direction to follow but flexibility
in taking responsibility for my own learning. However, I have realistic expectations
based on my own experiences which I hope will supplement my lessons and work within
the classroom. I want to make a difference in the world. Even if that difference is a
small one, if I affect a student’s life in the way mine was, I will have done my job.
As I project into the future, I imagine a classroom which is based heavily on
discussion and pushing student responsibility for their own learning and knowledge.
Lessons will center on specific topics from reading assignments which can be associated
with typical life situations and circumstances. The classes I enjoyed the most as a student
were open session courses where students’ inputs were valued and could be expressed
with little fear of judgment. Personal connections were made, not only between students
but with the teacher also. This is how I envision my own classroom, but I hope to
eliminate the fear of judgment and replace it with an environment where discussion,
debates, and open-minded arguments can be conducted amongst the participators. A
support system is essential to the success of any classroom and I hope to not only develop
one for my students, but to develop a lasting one.
Each week different styles of teaching will ideally be implemented. To start the
week off right, I plan on holding short presentations/speeches designed to get students
thinking independently and to establish leadership and communication skills. These
speeches will be no longer than a couple of seconds long (perhaps thirty seconds to a
minute long) and can be as serious or comical as the student wants. Points will be given
out for the assignments; however, the focus of the exercises will be to develop the skills
GWP
necessary for students to succeed in their future professions, whatever those may be. The
second course day will focus on short written requirements to get students to engage their
minds on basic topics and subjects to prepare them for the day plus develop their basic
writing skills and styles. I hope to teach them to develop a voice in their written work
which is evident and unique to themselves. While the class will of course remain
consistent with the district’s and department’s expectations and requirements, it will be
flexible and open to suggestions (both which are lessons I hope to teach students). It will
also have a special dedication and commitment to preparing students for the next step in
life: college, family, and full-time jobs. My classroom will be unique and the experience
unlike any other. The best courses I have ever taken were unique in their own ways.
Each previous classroom experience will contribute something special to my classroom
to make the courses unlike any other.
Students will hopefully step into the classroom excited; excited to learn, excited
to listen, and excited to participate. I want it to be an atmosphere unlike any other, where
students can come and feel accepted, able to share their opinion, work through problems
with one another, and build relationships that will transcend social barriers and clique
lines. I have been in four classrooms in my entire life’s experience: one in a high school
classroom and three at the collegiate level – which created an amazing educational
experience. These teachers and their setups inspire me to influence students’ lives just as
they influenced mine.
GWP
Oral Interpretations of Literature
English II
Kaitlyn Smugala
Fall Semester 2015
Rationale: Forming an academic community and support system within the classroom
will be a major focus within my courses. To accomplish this, I will be developing a
series of short public speaking opportunities which require students to step up and present
information which they themselves find important, meaningful, and necessary to the
success of their peers. This way, students build positive, communicative relationships
with each other. Essential work place skills will also be developed and honed,
particularly their public speaking and analytical skills.
Summary: At the beginning of the unit, students will research award-winning novels and
basic literary pieces, and then they will engage with the text and select a specific section
which they connect with. Individual interpretations will be conducted on their selections.
The literary piece will be presented with this interpretation in mind (for example:
presenting on Night by Elie Wiesel could elicit strong emotions so a student might chose
to present it as if they are Wiesel). The interpretations will be designed to elicit some
emotion so that the audience will be taken into the literary piece along with the presenter.
Afterwards, classmates will comment on one another's presentations. All students will
assess their own use of their analysis and capabilities presenting the information.
Essential Question(s): How can oral interpretations be applied in the professional
workplace? What kind of skills need to be developed to be successful in the professional
world?
Objectives:
1. Students will outline their thought process and steps of their presentations
with 100% accuracy. (Know)
2. Students will defend their work and connections with their literary works
three of four class days during the unit. (Comprehend)
3. Students will implement all aspects of the public speaking skills outlined in
the course syllabus requirements. (Apply)
4. During every class time, students will analyze literary works to determine how
they are valuable in modern society. (Analyze)
5. Students will assess their own use of three varying types of presentations
which demonstrates their proficiency in analysis of literary works and their
ability to present this information. (Evaluate)
6. At the completion of each assignment, students will compose creative writing
pieces which demonstrate their understanding by using key elements of their
analysis with 70% accuracy. (Create)
Literacy Strategies: Think Aloud, Text Structures, and Reaction Guide
GWP
Length of Unit: Two weeks
Materials and Resources:
- Materials:
o Chosen novel
o Written essay and speech
o Rubric
- Resources:
o Teacher
o Library
o Other students
Assessment:
- Pre-assessment:
o Short, two to three minute presentation on a “new invention”
This invention is a basic everyday item with a new useful purpose
o Skills to be assessed:
Rate of speech, volume, clarity, fluidity, knowledge and experience
of public speaking
- Formative:
o Written feedback from the teacher: small conferences with all students
during a class period to see how far along they are, give general feedback and
suggestions, and answer any questions the students might have on the
assignment
o Peer Review: while students are having conferences with the teacher, others
will be peer reviewing one another’s work (a rubric will be provided to
assess one another’s work and to provide feedback and comments for one
another); both of these formative assessments will be done on the same day
- Summative:
o Oral presentation on the literary work
o Short reflective essay
Students will be provided a rubric beforehand so that they are aware
of the expectations and items which will be graded
GWP
September 2012
◄ Aug 2012 ~ September 2012 ~ Oct 2012 ►
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 Introduction to unit Give out assignment sheets ASSIGNMENT: Decide on your literary piece and type out passage word for word for your presentation
11
12 Meet with peers to discuss ideas Turn in passages and titles Discuss the requirements and expectations of public speaking presentation ASSIGNMENT: Begin practicing passage. Write out presentation notes Parts to include: Introduction Passage Connection “Wow” moment Opinion Conclusion
13
14 Turn in presentation notes Meet with teacher to discuss ideas DO NOT share your passage or literary piece Watch previous student’s presentations and critique as a class Sign up for dates to present and times ASSIGNMENT: Continue to practice
15
16
17
18 Presenters 1 - 10
19
20 Presenters 11 – 20
21
22
23
24 Presenters 21 – 25 Spend time as a class assessing one another’s work Everyone needs to comment on another classmate’s work
25
26 Rubrics and grade sheets will be returned to students Answer student questions on grades Begin the next unit
27
28
29
GWP
Discussion Model Lesson Plan
Teacher Subject Level
Kaitlyn Smugala English Tenth
Topic:
Literary Interpretations – Classic Novels
Objective(s):
1. Students will outline their thought process and steps of their presentations with
100% accuracy. (Know)
2. Students will defend their work and connections with their literary works three of
four class days during the unit. (Comprehend)
3. During every class time, students will analyze literary works to determine how
they are valuable in modern society. (Analyze)
Materials needed: notebooks, pens
Phase 1: Clarify aims and establish set:
Purpose: to discuss the importance of varying classic literary pieces, their
connection within modern society, and one’s own connection with the
work
o Students will discuss what it means to be a class piece
Pieces could also be award-winning or significant pieces
which heavily influenced a generation
Introduction to the assignment:
o Hand out the rubric
o Discuss expectations of presentations
Make a connection
Present the literary work exactly as printed
Interpret the work through one’s own oral reading of it
Write a small review of this information
o Answer any questions students might have for the assignment
Discussion:
o Discuss in groups of four or five ideas you might have for the
assignment
o Document ideas presented
Do not narrow it down by student or name of work
This area needs to be a surprise to add to the “wow”
factor
Phase 2: Focus the discussion:
Expectations:
o Get together in groups
4 – 5 students per group
o Discuss ideas of literary pieces and document the ideas
GWP
Turn in this information (one sheet per group)
Label information with students’ names at the top of
the page
Format does not matter (concept map, points, etc.)
Do NOT specify what each student has decided upon nor
what specific works were discussed
The connections need to be documented and the
time spent discussing works needs to be
documented though
Write down the ideas you came up with your group
o What makes a literary work a classic?
o Why is this important/significant in modern
society?
o What works do you connect with?
Why?
o Respectful responses
Conduct the discussion in a professional manner
o Discussion will last approximately fifteen minutes
Group paper due at the end of the discussion
Prompt: What makes a literary work a classic?
o Why is this important/significant in modern
society?
o What works do you connect with?
Why?
Think-aloud
o Provide prompt and have students perform a think aloud off of the
syllabus
Two-minutes maximum
o Provide a short excerpt from a classic novel (see attached)
Give to students to read
Perform a think aloud of what students would do with this
particular piece of work
Reminder: this is not the required length of the
passage for students to read, it is simply an exercise
to work from
Phase 3: Hold the discussion:
Discussion Questions:
o What kind of topics did you discuss during your group work?
o What are you more interested in working with in general for this
assignment?
i.e. what genres of novels, what time period was the piece
written, etc.
GWP
o Does anyone else have a similar idea or disagree with this
approach and have something else which might help modify it (as
a suggestion)?
o Did another student provide an idea that sparked your own?
Feedback: Basic responses
o Feedback: used to build upon the subject or narrow it down
This will be short
Feedback will be heavier when passages are typed out and
turned in the next class period
This is going to be a homework check, not turned in
for me to look at
o This is to keep the element of surprise and
“wow” factor
o I will be monitoring the discussion as a viewer:
The discussion should be led by the students as much as
possible with some interjections and questions from the
teacher
Rules of the Discussion:
Every student will share their thoughts on their
thesis and subject
o Students should be responding to each other
by giving helpful comments/suggestions and
constructive criticism
o Be respectful
o The rules of the classroom apply to the
discussion
If the discussion gets out of hand, the
teacher will bring it back around so
that it is focused once more on the
task at hand
Purposeful interruptions and
disruptions will result in a deduction
of two points per incident
o Discussions are worth ten points of the day’s
work
Make comments and give feedback to students
During the discussion or one on one in a conference
Phase 4: End the discussion:
Closing the discussion:
o Once every student has spoken, review the monitoring report to see
if every student has responded to another
If not, give that student a chance to do so now
Summarizing the discussion:
o Give feedback to ideas
GWP
o A review of the themes and symbols which the students discussed,
if applicable
o Remind the students that this discussion will be helpful when it
comes time to write their paper
o State the topics and paper types which were discussed the most
Mention some that were not discussed if need be
Connection:
o This type of discussion can be used before all future papers and
novels if so desired
o A good exercise to use before beginning papers
Short analysis of topic and subject and what works best
o A good introduction to discussion which is a cornerstone to the rest
of the year’s classroom work
Phase 5: Debrief the discussion:
What kind of feedback do the students have?
o Did you like the exercise?
o Is there anything you would change about the discussion?
o Was it useful in developing your thesis or subject further?
Was there something else that might have helped more that
you could suggest?
o Were there any moments that bothered you?
Did the discussion digress at moments that made you feel
like it was a waste of time?
Did the class or teacher do a good job bringing it back to
topic?
o What are your opinions on the assignment in general?
Do you like the idea of working with specific pieces you
chose?
What would you like to change?
This could be discussed and adjusted if need be
Is everything understandable?
Does the assignment have any importance, in your opinion,
as far as the current semester has been going?
GWP
O'Brien, Tim. The Things They Carried. New York City: Broadway Books, 1990. 1-2.
Print.
The Things They Carried
By: Tim O’Brien
First Lieutenant Jimmy Cross carried letters from a girl named Martha, a junior at
Mount Sebastian College in New Jersey. They were not love letters, but Lieutenant
Cross was hoping, so he kept them folded in plastic at the bottom of his rucksack. In the
late afternoon, after a day’s march, he would dig his foxhole, wash his hands under a
canteen, unwrap the letters, hold them with the tips of his fingers, and spend the last hour
of the day pretending. He would image romantic camping trips into the White Mountains
in New Hampshire. He would sometimes taste the envelope flaps, knowing her tongue
had been there. More than anything, he wanted Martha to love him as he loved her, but
the letters were mostly chatty, elusive on the matter of love. She was a virgin, he was
almost sure.
GWP
Cooperative Learning Model Lesson Plan
Teacher Subject Grade Level
Kaitlyn Smugala English Tenth
Topic Cooperative Learning Approach: Group Investigation
Literary Interpretations – Class Novels
Objective(s):
1. Students will defend their work and connections with their literary works three of
four class days during the unit. (Comprehend)
2. Students will implement all aspects of the public speaking skills outlined in the
course syllabus requirements. (Apply)
3. During every class time, students will analyze literary works to determine how
they are valuable in modern society. (Analyze)
Materials needed:
Pens, papers, assignment sheets, classroom dry-erase boards, dry-erase markers
Phase 1: Introduction: Clarify goals and establish set.
Purpose: For students to learn how to work together to create a presentation while
forming collaborative relationships with one another during class time discussion
The students will choose elements of literary pieces which define these pieces as
classics
o Examples of:
Themes:
Loss of innocence
Love/lust
Cultural development
Relevance to society
Symbols:
Characterization:
Writing style:
Any specific elements?
o Flowery language
o Short, simple, to the point
o Lengthy paragraphs
o Lengthy words and vocabulary choice
Phase 2: Present information (outline of content):
Presentation of assignment
o What defines a class novel?
On the dry-erase boards, write down these ideas on the board
Each group will present some information from your board
Research needs to highlight:
o What to look for:
Consistency
Meaning
GWP
Importance
Impact
Relation to characters
Effect of events
Assign groups:
o Select partners around you and separate into groups of three or four
Phase 3: Organize students into learning teams:
Students are allowed to choose their teams but choose wisely because these
students will be responsible together for pieces of information on the topic you
choose
o Groups must consist (preferably) of two males and two females
Transition quickly from your seats to a group seating formation with everyone
facing each other
Assign tasks:
o Name a group member as:
Task master
Material monitor
Coach or content helper
Recorder
All members of the group will be responsible for the
information
All members of the group will present with one another
Group Investigation:
o Topic selection
o Cooperative planning
o Implementation
o Analysis and synthesis
o Presentation of final product
o Evaluation
Phase 4: Assist team work and study:
Choose elements of class novels which consistently show up in pieces we
typically call ‘classic’ and give an example of a literary piece which represents
this element
o Example:
Flowery writing style – Hamlet by William Shakespeare
Symbolism – Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne
Cultural impact – The Second Sex by Simone de Beauvoir
Modern cultural relevance – All Quiet on the Western Front by
Erich Maria Remarque
Fully developed characters – Black Boy by Richard Wright
What to look for:
o Do any of these elements stretch across a lot of literary pieces
GWP
o Are there any ones which do not
o Are any elements strictly exclusive to classic literary elements
Groups to present on information during the class period
Take notes on the information in a concise and organized way
o Will receive five points at the end of the day for your short presentation
Use the dry-erase boards available to create a visual for other students to view and
learn
If you have any questions or problems let me know, I will be walking around
class
Phase 5: Test on the materials:
During the presentations, take notes
There will be a short informal test which will assess your ability and
understanding of the information presented by the other groups
o This ‘test’ will require each student to list seven literary elements we
discussed in class and provide an example of a literary piece which
embodies this particular element
This literary piece must be new to that element
In other words, if we discussed Night for its writing style in
class but you want to show that it also embodies the
element of cultural relevance, then defend it!
A short essay (2 – 4 sentences) needs to be provided to explain
why this particular literary piece embodies that specific element
Turn in before you leave class for the day
Phase 6: Provide team recognition
In class, we will take a few moments to assess one another’s presentations
o Look for elements of:
Skill
Areas of improvement
Compliments
Suggestions
Opinions
Etc.
o Every person must speak once
o Each group will be highlighted
Each group member must be provided with some kind of feedback
by their peers; more than one comment is more than okay!
Questions, comments?
Meet after class or during study periods if there are any questions about the
assignment
Have a nice day!
GWP
Discussion Model Lesson Plan
Teacher Subject Level
Kaitlyn Smugala English Ninth
Topic:
Oral Interpretations of Literature
Objective(s):
1. During every class time, students will analyze literary works to determine how
they are valuable in modern society. (Analyze)
2. Students will assess their own use of three varying types of presentations
which demonstrates their proficiency in analysis of literary works and their
ability to present this information. (Evaluate)
3. At the completion of each assignment, students will compose creative writing
pieces which demonstrate their understanding by using key elements of their
analysis with 70% accuracy. (Create)
Materials needed: notebook, pens/pencils, list of elements
Phase 1: Clarify aims and establish set:
Purpose: To discuss and discover various types of oral interpretations,
how one can portray these interpretations, and to begin thinking about how
you will orally interpret your literary selection
o Then: self-evaluations will be completed on the work plus a self-
reflection essay assignment will be handed out to turn in on the day
of the presentations
This section should only last a few minutes
Phase 2: Focus the discussion:
Expectations:
o Get together in groups
3 – 4 students per group
o Questions to discuss:
How can one interpret literary pieces
What aspects of these pieces are the most important
Are emotions the most powerful
Why is it important to interpret literary pieces from
centuries ago
Do they still have power in modern society
How is it relevant to you
Are all interpretations the same
o Respectful responses
Conduct the discussion in a professional manner
o Discussion will last approximately fifteen minutes
GWP
Prompt: How can one orally interpret literature?
Phase 3: Hold the discussion:
Discussion Questions:
o What kind of topics did you discuss during your group work?
What type of paper would be appropriate for that topic?
Are there multiple types?
o What are you more interested in working with in general for this
novel?
o Does anyone else have a similar idea or disagree with this
approach and have something else which might help modify it (as
a suggestion)?
o Follow questions based in the small group discussions and expand
upon it
Feedback: Basic responses
o Acknowledgement of student responses
o Feedback:
Remind them that certain responses are more appropriate
than others and that these responses need to be based in the
student’s personal connection to the literary selection
Make sure they provide evidence from the work
o I will be monitoring the discussion as a viewer:
The discussion should be led by the students as much as
possible with some interjections and questions from the
teacher
Rules of the Discussion:
Every student will share their thoughts on their
thesis and subject
o Students should be responding to each other
by giving helpful comments/suggestions and
constructive criticism
o Be respectful
o The rules of the classroom apply to the
discussion
If the discussion gets out of hand, the
teacher will bring it back around so
that it is focused once more on the
task at hand
Purposeful interruptions and
disruptions will result in a deduction
of two points per incident
Record of the discussion:
o Marks will be made for every student’s
comments
GWP
Five points makes up the student’s
explanation of the topic and thesis
Five points for responding to another
student
Make comments and give feedback to students
During the discussion or one on one in a conference
Phase 4: End the discussion:
Closing the discussion:
o Once every student has spoken, review the monitoring report to see
if every student has responded to another
If not, give that student a chance to do so now
Summarizing the discussion:
o Give feedback to ideas
A review of the elements discussed
Connection:
o Connect to outside of the classroom
o How can one orally interpret literature be used in a business and
professional atmosphere
Skewing data in statistical presentations
Selling product
Motivating workers
Phase 5: Debrief the discussion:
What kind of feedback do the students have?
o Did you like the exercise?
o Is there anything you would change about the discussion?
o Was it useful in developing your thesis or subject further?
Was there something else that might have helped more that
you could suggest?
o Were there any moments that bothered you?
Did the discussion digress at moments that made you feel
like it was a waste of time?
Did the class or teacher do a good job bringing it back to
topic?
o Are there any types of interpretations that we missed or that you
feel is inappropriate for the classroom?
Assignment: Write a self-reflection of the assignment and presentation
you completed for this unit. The length should be about 3 – 4 pages long
and should be professionally written in the correct MLA format.
Reminder: Presentations are next class! Bring in your self-reflection essay
to be turned in
GWP
Oral Interpretations of Literature Presentation Assignment:
Assignment:
We will spend a few weeks evaluating the elements of specific literary pieces
which define a novel as a class novel (example: Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain or Of
Mice and Men by John Steinbeck). The ultimate project will be to present a selection
from a literary piece which not only meets the requirements the class designates for a
novel to be a class novel and to orally interpret that piece. Lesson One will provide a
discussion on a short literary piece Ms. Smugala will present and a discussion of possible
ideas for presentations. Lesson Two will focus on defining, as a class, a list which is not
necessarily all-inclusive for which to set our standards by. This list will be distributed to
the class as a set of requirements on the final assignment sheet and rubric. Lesson Three
will focus on the self-evaluation aspect of the assignment, plus, it will focus on the oral
interpretations requirement.
Requirements:
Time Length: 5 – 7 minutes in length; if an extended period of time is required,
make sure you contact me in advance so we can accommodate you
Dress Code: business casual to professional
Men: dress pants, khakis, button-down shirts, dress shoes, suits
Women: dresses, dress pants, blouses, skirts, heels of appropriate length
Unacceptable: jeans, holes in the outfits, low cut shirts, tight muscle shirts,
etc.
Delivery: volume and rate of speech are dependent on literary selection and can
fluctuate per presenter, eye contact is made with all corners of the room and is
kept at eye level, body posture is professional and appropriate to literary selection
Oral Interpretation: emotion is elicited from the literary selection, presentation is
not necessarily acted out but presents one’s own interpretation of the work, there
should be a personal connection with this work which is present if not specifically
evident (this personal connection will be highlighted in the self-reflection essay)
Books/Novel/Literary Pieces Suggestions:
Night – Elie Wiesel Gone with the Wind – Margaret Mitchell The Things They
Carried – Tim O’Brien The Old Man and the Sea – Ernest Hemingway To Kill
a Mockingbird – Harper Lee 1984 – George Orwell Poems – Edgar Allan Poe
Romeo and Juliet – William Shakespeare As I Lay Dying – William Faulkner
Fahrenheit 451 – Ray Bradbury
There are a ton more! If you have a question about whether or not a novel or literary
piece is appropriate, ask! If I disagree that it is, and you can justify it by the list we
created as a class, then go for it! It never hurts to ask.
GWP
Schedule of Presentations:
1. Introduce yourself
2. Introduce your literary selection
a. Provide a short synopsis
i. Do not give away your selection choice
ii. Do not give away the ending of the novel
b. Give information which is necessary to understand the passage without
giving away too much (aka. Spoilers)
3. Read your selection: word for word
4. Pause
5. The presentation will end here
a. The moment of silence will be to soak in the information
b. Comments will be given by your peers for a few minutes afterwards
GWP
Collaborative Work Skills : Oral Interpretations of Literature Presentations
Teacher Name: Ms. Smugala
Student Name: ________________________________________
CATEGORY 0-4 5-6 7-8 9-10
Time-management
Presentation time reaches well beyond the limited amount despite warnings given by the teacher
Usually uses time well throughout the project, but may have procrastinated on one thing. Distribution between speech parts is partially unequal (see assignment sheet)
Meets the time requirement well; each section follows the assignment sheet well with one to two deviations
Each section in the presentation correctly meets the assignment sheet\'s requirements and expectations
Preparedness Student is completely unprepared to present; the self-evaluation is incomplete or is not turned in
Student has all required elements to present, including the self-evaluation
Elements of Assignment
Three or more required elements from the syllabus are missing
Some required elements are missing from the presentation but work in general is done well
One or two minor elements are missing; completed work is done effectively and meets standards
All elements of the assignment sheet are present and are completed effectively to meet all standards
Literary Choice Literary piece is inappropriate; does not meet the required standards listed on assignment sheet
Literary piece meets all requirements and standards listed on the assignment sheet
Presence Presenter was absent without an excuse resulting in an immediate loss of points; presenter does not meet dress code requirements (i.e. jeans, holes)
Presenter was present on assigned day; meets dress code requirements (i.e. dress pants, button-down shirts, heels, etc.)
Delivery Delivery is poor; speaker is hard to understand, tone is inappropriate, rate of speech is too fast or too slow, volume is too low, lack of eye
Delivery expectations are met in some degrees but not in most categories
Delivery expectations are met for the most part only a couple of noticeable devations
Delivery Expectations are fully met; there is proper eye contact, body positioning is appropriate, tone and volume
GWP
contact, and/or body positioning is poor
requirements are met, and rate of speech is appropriate per literary piece; presenter is easy to understand
GWP
Self-Reflection Essay:
Assignment:
Write a self-reflection of the assignment and presentation you completed for this
unit. The length should be 3 – 4 pages long and should be professionally written in the
correct MLA format.
Focus of the Essay:
What is your opinion of the assignment
What would you change, if anything
Was it too easy or too hard; were there specific elements which were
Why did you choose your particular literary piece
What personal connection did you make to it
What did you do well
What did you do poorly
Evaluate your apprehension or excitement towards the oral presentation
Why did you have this emotion
Is there anything we can do as a class to help you as a learner
Talk about the oral interpretations aspect of the assignment
Was it easy to embody as specific emotion
Were these particular expectations clear
Why did you find this portion hard/hardest or east/easiest
This is to be turned in on the first day of presentations. Late work will lose automatic
points.
Point Value – 60
GWP
FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: MS. SMUGALA BEFORE AND AFTER CLASS
STUDENT PRESENTATIONS! ON ORAL INTERPRETATIONS OF CLASS LITERATURE
SEPTEMBER 18, 2013 CLASS TIME!
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI SAINT LOUIS
Our first presenters will thrill us with their interpretations and everyone will provide
constructive feedback! REMINDER: EVERYONE MUST BRING IN THEIR SELF-
EVALUATION TO PARTICIPATE