Istituto Nazionale per le malattie Infettive L. Spallanzani Roma, Italy Diagnosis of latent...
-
Upload
suzanna-simmons -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Istituto Nazionale per le malattie Infettive L. Spallanzani Roma, Italy Diagnosis of latent...
Istituto Nazionale per le malattie Infettive L. SpallanzaniRoma, Italy
Diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection: the role of IGRAs
Delia Goletti, MD, PhD
Translational Research Unit, INMI
ERS online course on tuberculosis, March 8th, 2011
March 8th , 2011 Best wishes to all women in the “woman
day”!
Agenda
LTBI definition
TST
IGRA
New experimental tests
Global burden of TB in 2009
Estimated number of
CasesN. (%)
DeathsN. (%)
All forms of TBWomen
9.4 million3.3 million (35%)
1.3 million380,000 (29%)
HIV-associated TB
1.1 million (12%) 400,000 (36%)
MDR-TB 440,000 (4.6%) 150,000 (34%)
WHO report, 2010
Immunity against M. tuberculosis
Adapted by Schwander and Dheda, 2011
Different stages of tuberculosis
Infection eliminated with or without T cell priming
Infection (latent tuberculosis infection, LTBI) Recent
(with half of the total risk to progress to active disease within 2
years) Latent
(with half of the risk to progress to active disease during the
whole life time)
Active disease
Bacterial load ?
Adapted from:Young et al, Trends in Immunol, 2009
Barry et al, Nature Reviews Microbiol, 2009
Latent infection with M. tuberculosis Direct identification of M. tuberculosis in individuals
who are latently infected is not possible.
LTBI is a status characterized by the absence of clinical, and radiological evidence of TB disease and the diagnosis is performed by an immune test that ascertains M. tuberculosis-specific immune responses (positive TST or an IGRA) due to:
a presumptive infection with M. tuberculosis (Mack et al, ERJ 2009)
a condition where human tissues contain living M. tuberculosis that persists in a state of altered metabolism that potentially may later reactivate (Opie and Aronson, 1927; Ulrichs et al, JID 2005)
Evidence for the existence of LTBI?
TST+ contacts have a higher risk for developing TB that is reduced by INH treatment (Ferebee et al, 1962; Veening et al, 1968; Egsmose et al, 1965)
Erkens C et al. Eur Respir J 2010
Treatment regimen Efficacy/effectiveness Evidence
12 mo INH 93%/75% A
9 mo INH 90% C
6 mo INH 69%65% A
4 mo RIFunknown (>3 mo
INH/RIF)C
3 mo INH/RIF equivalent to 6 mo INH A
Latent infection with M. tuberculosis : size of the problem
It is estimated (by TST) that 2 billion people globally are latently infected with M. tuberculosis (Sudre et al, 1992)
LTBI subjects may develop active TB because of the waning of effective host immune responses due to:
chronic diseases such as diabetes, alcoholic liver disease, malnutrition, immunosuppression due to :
HIV co-infection steroids or other immunosuppressive drugs
Agenda
LTBI definition
TST
IGRA
New experimental tests
Principle of the Tuberculin skin test (TST)
intradermal antigen-inoculation
uptake by antigen-presenting cells
antigen-presentation in lymph nodes interaction with T-cells
cytokine-release clonal T-cell expansion
increase in capillary permeability
influx of memory T cells into the test area
palpable induration (max. at 48-72 h)
Limitations of the TST Reagent:
Purified protein derivative (PPD) commonly shared among different Mycobacteria (M.tuberculosis, BCG and atypical mycobacteria)
Variability: Reproducibility in giving the
test Subjectivity in reading the test
Logistics Repeat visit needed 3 days before result
Positive TST
M. tuberculosis
Active TB disease
Latent TB infection
Non Tuberculosis Micobacteria
(NTM)
Exposure to environmental mycobacteria or disease
BCG-vaccination
BCG-vaccination
TST
TST does not distinguishamong all these different clinical situations
Need of…
Standardized test (laboratory test)
M. tuberculosis-specific reagents
Possibility to discriminate between the different stages of tuberculosis
Need of…
Standardized test (laboratory test)
M. tuberculosis-specific reagents
Possibility to discriminate between the different stages of tuberculosis
Species specificities of ESAT-6 and CFP-10
Environmental strains
Antigens
ESAT CFP
M abcessus - -M avium - -M branderi - -M celatum - -M chelonae - -M fortuitum - -M gordonii - -M intracellulare
- -M kansasii + +M malmoense - -M marinum + +M oenavense - -M scrofulaceum
- -M smegmatis - -M szulgai + +M terrae - -M vaccae - -M xenopi - -
Tuberculosis complex
Antigens
ESAT CFP
M tuberculosis + +M africanum + +M bovis + +BCG substrain
gothenburg - - moreau - - tice - - tokyo - - danish - - glaxo - - montreal - - pasteur - -
Agenda
LTBI definition
TST
IGRA
New experimental tests
IGRA
RD1
IFN-γ
PBMC Whole Blood
T SPOT.TB QuantiFERON TB Gold In tube
IGRA
Nil (negative control)
RD1 peptides (M. tuberculosis-specific antigens)
Mitogen (positive control)Test Result Nil RD1 peptides
(M. tuberculosis-specific antigen)
Mitogen
Indeterminate
– – –
Negative – – +
Positive – + +
Positive RD1-IGRA
BCG-vaccination
NTM
Positive M. tuberculosis infection/disease
RD1-IGRA
Comparison TST vs IGRATST RD1 IGRA
ELISPOT
(e.g. T-SPOT TB)
ELISA
(e.g. QuantiFERON-TB Gold IT)
Internal control no yes yes
Antigens PPD Peptides from CFP-10, ESAT-6
Peptides from CFP-10, ESAT-6 and TB7.7
Tests’ substrate Skin PBMC Whole Blood
Time required for the results
72 h 24 h 24h
Cells involved Neutrophils, CD4, CD8 that transmigrate out of capillaries into the skin. Treg (CD4+CD25highFoxP3+).
CD4 T cells in vitro CD4 T cells in vitro
Cytokines involved
IFN-γ, TNF-α, TNF-β
IFN-γ IFN-γ
Modified from Mack et al, ERJ 2009
Comparison TST vs IGRATST RD1 IGRA
ELISPOT
(e.g. T-SPOT TB)
ELISA
(e.g. QuantiFERON-TB Gold IT)
Read-out Measure of diameter of dermal induration
Enumeration of IFN- spots
Measure of optical density values of IFN- production
Outcomes measure
Level of induration
Number of IFN- producing T cells
Plasma concentration of IFN- produced by T cells
Read-out units mm IFN- spot forming cells
IU/ml
Modified from Mack et al, ERJ 2009
Comparison TST vs IGRATST RD1 IGRA
ELISPOT
(e.g. T-SPOT TB)
ELISA
(e.g. QuantiFERON-TB Gold IT)
Technical expertise required
Medium high Medium high Low medium
Cost of reader machine
- Medium high Low medium
Cost of the assay
low high high
Modified from Mack et al, ERJ 2009
Comparison TST vs IGRATST RD1 IGRA
ELISPOT
(e.g. T-SPOT TB)
ELISA
(e.g. QuantiFERON-TB Gold IT)
Conversion Criteria established for recent infection
Not established yet Not established yet
Recent vs remote infection
Does not differentiate
Does not differentiate Does not differentiate
Exposure correlation
Some degree, especially if not BCG-vaccinated
high high
Modified from Leung et al, ERJ 2011
Need of…
Standardized test (laboratory test)
M. tuberculosis-specific reagents: accuracy
Possibility to discriminate between the different stages of tuberculosis
Accuracy
Sensitivity and specificity
Predictive value of IGRA for active TB development
Efficacy of preventive therapy based on IGRA results
Accuracy of IGRA: sensitivity and specificity
Summary of pooled values from the metanalysis performed by Pai et al, and by Sester and Sotgiu et al
TestSensitivity for active
TB
Specificity for TB infection
Specificity for active TB
Percentage
TST Pai et al, 2008 77 59/97
Sester et Sotgiu et al,
201065 75
QFT-IT
Pai et al, 2008 70 96 -
Sester et Sotgiu et al,
201080 - 79
T-SPOT.TB
Pai et al, 2008 90 93 -
Sester et Sotgiu et al,
201081 -
59
Conclusions Sensitivities of both IGRAs in detecting active
TB were higher than that of TST Sensitivities of IGRAs are not high enough to
be used as rule out tests for tuberculosis
Specificity of IGRAs is insufficient when assessed among controls including TB suspects No distinction between active TB and latent
M. tuberculosis infection
Accuracy
Sensitivity and specificity
Predictive value of IGRA for active TB development
Efficacy of preventive therapy based on IGRA results
Predictive value of IGRA: HIV-negative subjects
Diel et al, AJRCCM 2010
1414 contacts followed in Hamburg, Germany
Negative predictive value of T-SPOT. TB assay in tuberculosis suspects
Diel , Goletti et al, ERJ 2010
Negative predictive value for progression in QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube or T-SPOT.TB assay negative subjects
Diel , Goletti et al, ERJ 2010
Rates of disease progression in IGRA+ vs TST +
Country Test Incidence of active TB in IGRA+ groups
Comment
Gambia [Hill et al. 2008]
ELISPOT (in-house)
9/1000 person-yr High burden
Colombia [del Corral et al. 2009]
In-house CFP-10 assay
7/1000 person-yr High Burden
Senegal [Lienhardt et al. 2010]
ELISPOT (in-house- 32 SFC cut-point)
9/1000 person-yr High burden
Turkey [Bakir et al. 2008]
ELISPOT (in house similar to T-SPOT TB)
21/1000 person-yr Intermediate
Germany [Diel et al. 2010]
QFT-IT 73/ 1000 person-yr Low burden
From Pai and Dheda, personal data 2011
Accuracy
Sensitivity and specificity
Predictive value of IGRA for active TB development
Efficacy of preventive therapy based on IGRA results: .......................NO DATA AVAILABLE....................
Vulnerable populations
Children
Immuno-suppressed for: HIV Autoimmune disease
Sensitivity and specificity of IGRAs in children with active TB
Ling at al, Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, 2011
Comparison of TST/IGRAs in children with active TB
Source Patient number
TST+
%
T-SPOT TB+
%
QTF-G+
%
To note
Liebeschuetz et al, Lancet 2004
57 57 81 NA TB microbiologically diagnosed
Kampmann et al, ERJ 2009
25 83 58 80 TB microbiologically diagnosed
Hermann JL et al, Plos 2008
32 87 NA 78 TB microbiologically diagnosed in 48%
Nicol et al, Pediatrics 2009
10 80 50 NA TB microbiologically diagnosed
Connell et al, Plos 2008
9 89 100 89 TB clinically diagnosed
IGRA in HIV+ with active TB, as a surrogate marker for the accuracy in LTBI
Hoffmann and Ravn, European Infectious Diseases, 2010
Proportion of in vitro anergic responses to IGRAs in HIV+ patients
Brock, Resp Res 2007
Vincenti, Clin Exp Imm 2007
Luetkemeyer, AJRCCM 2007
Clark, Clin Exp Imm 2007
Karam, Plos ONE 2008
Rabi, Plos ONE 2008
Test QFT ELISPOT home-made
QFT QFT ELISPOT home-made
QFT
N. Patients
590 111 196 201 247 84
CD4 per l
<100 4 (24%) 12 (57%) 5 (16%) 4 (6%) 6 (16%) 6 (46%)
100-200 1 (3%) 4 (19%) 4 (3.6%)
1 (NA)
12 (31%) 3 (15%)
201-300 5 (8%) 3 (14%) 10 (26) 3 (13%)
IGRAs in subjects with for autoimmune diseases under immune suppressive therapy
Solovic et al, ERJ 2010
Positive RD1-IGRA
BCG-vaccination
NTM
Positive M. tuberculosis infection/diseas
e
RD1-IGRA
Positive RD1-IGRA do not distinguishactive TB disease and LTBI
Active TB disease
Latent TB infection:
• Recently acquired or
• Remotely acquired
Need of…
Standardized test (laboratory test)
M. tuberculosis-specific reagents
Possibility to discriminate between the different stages of tuberculosis
Agenda
LTBI definition
TST
IGRA
New experimental tests
Why is it important to distinguish between latent infection and active TB disease? To provide a correct diagnosis:
Active TB disease: Organ destruction and/or death Spread of infection in the community
Latent infection
To provide a correct and efficacious therapy: Active TB disease: 2 months therapy with 4 drugs
and the 2 months therapy with 2 drugs Latent TB infection: 6 months therapy with one drug
To save human and economic costs avoiding complex evaluations (i.e. clinical, radiological and surgery procedures). Ex: extra-pulmonary TB
New experimental tests
Antigen different from the commercial RD1 peptides (RD1 selected peptides, antigens of latency, Rv2628, HBHA)
Marker different from IFN-γ (IP-10, MCP-2, IL-2)
Readout different from ELISA or ELISPOT Biological sample different from blood (BAL,
pleural fluid, CNS)
Our approach: use of peptides from ESAT-6 and CFP-10 selected by computational analysis
Peptides selected by computational analysis that cover more than 90% of the HLA class II specificities
Peptide Position sequence
DR-serological specificities covered
1- ESAT-6 6-28 1, 3, 4, 8, 11(5), 13(6), 52, 53
2- ESAT-6 66-78 3, 8, 11(5), 13(6), 15(2), 52
3- CFP-10 18-31 3, 5, 11(5), 52
4- CFP-10 43-70 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 11(5),13(6), 15(2), 52
5- CFP-10 74-86 3, 4, 7, 11(5), 12(5), 13(6), 15 (2)
IFN-γ response to RD1 selected peptides is associated to active TB
Modified Vincenti
et al, Mol Med 2003
IFN-γ
responseto the
antigen of latency
Rv2628 is associated to remote LTBI
Goletti et al, ERJ 2010
IFN-γ response to the antigen of latency Rv2628 is associated to remote LTBI
Screening of contacts of patients with active TB, after exclusion of Active TB, among those positive to IGRA
IGRA-positive
Rv2628+ Rv2628-
Likely
Remote LTBI
Likely
Recent Infection
Higher need of chemoprophilaxis
IFN-γ
responseto the
methilated HBHA of M. tuberculosis
produced in M. smegmatisis
significantly
reduced in patientswithactive
tuberculosis
Delogu, et al and Goletti, in press PloS One
IFN-γ response to the methilated HBHA of M. tuberculosis produced in M. smegmatis is associated with a status of TB control
Screening of subjects suspected of active TB, among those positive to IGRA
IGRA-positive
mHBHA- mHBHA+
LikelyActive TB
LikelyNo active TB:
Recent Infection, Remote Infection,
past cured TB
New experimental tests
Antigen different from the commercial RD1 peptides (RD1 selected peptides, antigens of latency, Rv2628, HBHA)
Marker different from IFN-γ (IP-10, MCP-2, IL-2)
Readout different from ELISA or ELISPOT Biological sample different from blood (BAL,
pleural fluid, CNS)
Detection of IP-10 in the plasma from
QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-tube
From Ruwald et al, modified Microbes Infection 2007
INCREASE OF SENSITIVITY !
IP-10 response in HIV-infected subjects in India
Goletti et al, PLoS One 2010
IFN-γ response to RD1 selected peptides and QFT-IT is impaired in the HIV+ patients defined as “mitogen-unresponsive”
Goletti et al, PLoS One 2010
New experimental tests
Antigen different from the commercial RD1 peptides (RD1 selected peptides, antigens of latency, Rv2628, HBHA)
Marker different from IFN-γ (IP-10, MCP-2, IL-2)
Readout different from ELISA or ELISPOT Biological sample different from blood (BAL,
pleural fluid, CSF)
Dominant TNF-α M. tuberculosis-specific CD4 T cell responses discriminate between LTBI and active TB disease
From Harari et al, Nature medicine 2011
New experimental tests
Antigen different from the commercial RD1 peptides (RD1 selected peptides, antigens of latency, Rv2628, HBHA)
Marker different from IFN-γ (IP-10, MCP-2, IL-2)
Readout different from ELISA or ELISPOT Biological sample different from blood (BAL,
pleural fluid, CSF, skin)
IGRA at the site of TB disease: BAL vs blood
From Jafari, AJRCCM 2009
Skin test based on rdESAT-6 in humans infected with M. tuberculosis
From Arend et al, Tuberculosis 2007
Agenda
LTBI definition
TST
IGRA
New experimental tests
And thank you to:
Translational Research Unit, INMI
Outpatient Clinic of Pneumology, INMI
Acknowledgments Epidemiology Department, INMI, Rome, Italy
E. Girardi, G. Ippolito
Translational Research Unit, INMI, Rome, Italy V. Vanini, T. Chiacchio, G. Cuzzi, E. Petruccioli, L. Petrone, D. Goletti
Clinical Department, INMI, Rome, Italy M. Vecchi, C. Copertino, F. Lauria
International collaborations Dept. of Infectious Diseases and Dept. of Immunohematology & Blood Transfusion,
Leiden, The Netherlands K.L.M.C. Franken, T.H.M. Ottenhoff
Case Western Reserve UniversityCleveland, Ohio Zahra Toossi, MD
Hopital Saint Louis de Paris Paris, France Philippe Lagrange, MD
Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain Josè Dominguez, PhD
Medical Clinical Infectious Diseases Research Center, Borstel, Germany Christoph Lange, MD, PhD
Tuberculosis Research Center (TBRC) Chennai, India Raja Alamelu, PhD
Hinduja Hospital University Medical Center Mumbai, India Camilla Rodriguez, MD