Istanbul politecture

111
Istanbul Politics of Architecture Architecture of Politics Politecture Archilitics Achilles Eye

Transcript of Istanbul politecture

Page 1: Istanbul politecture

IstanbulPolitics of ArchitectureArchitecture of Politics

PolitectureArchiliticsAchilles

Eye

Page 2: Istanbul politecture

“If you want to destroy one culture, firstYou have to destroy the architect.

When you have managed to destroy the architect, thenYou can start to destroy the language.”

Barbaros Sansal

Fashion designer / Political Activist

Page 3: Istanbul politecture
Page 4: Istanbul politecture
Page 5: Istanbul politecture
Page 6: Istanbul politecture
Page 7: Istanbul politecture

Recent years, UNESCO has been the protector in charge of restoration of these old buildings.

Page 8: Istanbul politecture
Page 9: Istanbul politecture

Yet there are too many of these old buildings, most are left to rot.

Page 10: Istanbul politecture

Survival

Page 11: Istanbul politecture
Page 12: Istanbul politecture
Page 13: Istanbul politecture
Page 14: Istanbul politecture

Turkey’s entire modern political and social history could be read in their rotten beams and leaking roofs.

Page 15: Istanbul politecture
Page 16: Istanbul politecture
Page 17: Istanbul politecture

Timber house traditions stem from the great earthquake in 1509.

Page 18: Istanbul politecture
Page 19: Istanbul politecture
Page 20: Istanbul politecture

Timber bends when short waves travel through them, unlike solid substances like brick and stone.

However, are vulnerable to fires.

Page 21: Istanbul politecture

Dates

1600s- rise of wooden constructions1560- imperial decree declaring Janissaries responsibilities of fire-fighting1714- first fire engine built by French engineer1871- serious fire founds the first fire department19th to early 20th- current remaining wooden housesWW1- authorities banned construction with woodEnd of Ottoman period- decline in wooden construction

Page 22: Istanbul politecture
Page 23: Istanbul politecture
Page 24: Istanbul politecture
Page 25: Istanbul politecture

Large, single central space for most living functions may have come from tents used by nomadic Turkish tribes.

Page 26: Istanbul politecture
Page 27: Istanbul politecture
Page 28: Istanbul politecture
Page 29: Istanbul politecture

Living above animals kept on the ground floor also functions as a heating system.

Page 30: Istanbul politecture

Reason of material (wood)

1. Humidification (retains moisture- cleaner air)2. Earthquakes3. Fast and lighter protection4. Eaves- fires, revolutions, invasions, street sailor? ; [vision] <- insecurity

Page 31: Istanbul politecture
Page 32: Istanbul politecture
Page 33: Istanbul politecture
Page 34: Istanbul politecture
Page 35: Istanbul politecture
Page 36: Istanbul politecture
Page 37: Istanbul politecture
Page 38: Istanbul politecture
Page 39: Istanbul politecture

Wood- mainly Turkish, invaders, efficiency (cheap, light)

Stones, bricks- Christians, Armenians, Jews

Jewelry, textile, hands and craftsmanship- non-MuslimsPalace art, writing, decorations, miniatures- Muslims, Turks (not allowed to trade)

Page 40: Istanbul politecture
Page 41: Istanbul politecture
Page 42: Istanbul politecture
Page 43: Istanbul politecture
Page 44: Istanbul politecture
Page 45: Istanbul politecture
Page 46: Istanbul politecture
Page 47: Istanbul politecture
Page 48: Istanbul politecture

-breakdown of Ottoman empire -> minority groups suffered-1.5 m Armenians, Syrians, Greeks killed or died on forced marches1955- Greek community prosecutedBeginning 20th- non-Muslim = 40%Today- 100,000 remain in Istanbul

(60 000 Armenians, 20 000 Jews, 17 000 Syrians, 3 000 Greeks)(3 000 000 Kurdish)

Page 49: Istanbul politecture
Page 50: Istanbul politecture

-Brick structure, wooden skin-Bulgarian style

Page 51: Istanbul politecture
Page 52: Istanbul politecture
Page 53: Istanbul politecture
Page 54: Istanbul politecture

Corruption

Page 55: Istanbul politecture

1923- independent republicDemocratic and Republican party, strong military presence1940s- nationalization1950s- “Islamization”, construction of apartments -> cement + bricks

Rich districts either destroyed the wooden ruins or covered themselves with a wooden skin.Wooden houses on islands are rather untouched.

Page 56: Istanbul politecture
Page 57: Istanbul politecture
Page 58: Istanbul politecture
Page 59: Istanbul politecture
Page 60: Istanbul politecture
Page 61: Istanbul politecture
Page 62: Istanbul politecture

Urbanization

Page 63: Istanbul politecture
Page 64: Istanbul politecture
Page 65: Istanbul politecture
Page 66: Istanbul politecture
Page 67: Istanbul politecture
Page 68: Istanbul politecture
Page 69: Istanbul politecture
Page 70: Istanbul politecture
Page 71: Istanbul politecture

on Kurdish policies (book)

https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=7QEjPVyd9YMC&pg=PA411&lpg=PA411&dq=kurdish+architecture+istanbul&source=bl&ots=uqsLVKmBKC&sig=bqkkoXtxEG9OmH3WhiKfCIHDJ44&hl=zh-TW&sa=X&ei=UNEOVYaXNsbX8gWEuYDQDQ&ved=0CFIQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=kurdish%20architecture%20istanbul&f=false

Page 72: Istanbul politecture

Hope

Page 73: Istanbul politecture
Page 74: Istanbul politecture
Page 75: Istanbul politecture

Taksim Square is an essential space of division (conflict) and distribution (coexistence) that must not be annulled.

Page 76: Istanbul politecture

That crisis is revealed by the actions of purportedly democratic regimes that do nothing more than replicate imagistic devices, real and discursive (such as those beautiful Ottoman facades), which hide the true nature of political agendas.

Page 77: Istanbul politecture

Power is sustained by the illusion that it speaks for us, for our history and our future, for our democracy and its values. What we are beginning to see is the proliferation of democratic powers that grant us the possibility to express ourselves, but on no account to express our rights.

Page 78: Istanbul politecture

The singular democratic right at stake is the right of politicization against aestheticization: the right to access the political realm from which we have been deprived, thepolis, the only place where we may ensure our individual and collective freedom.

Page 79: Istanbul politecture

http://www.ibb.gov.tr/tr-TR/Pages/Haber.aspx?NewsID=20709#.VRCCWPmUcrb

Page 80: Istanbul politecture
Page 81: Istanbul politecture
Page 82: Istanbul politecture

Buyukada/Prinkipo island

Page 83: Istanbul politecture
Page 84: Istanbul politecture
Page 85: Istanbul politecture
Page 86: Istanbul politecture
Page 87: Istanbul politecture
Page 88: Istanbul politecture
Page 89: Istanbul politecture
Page 90: Istanbul politecture

RUM ORPHANAGE

Page 91: Istanbul politecture
Page 92: Istanbul politecture

The Rum Orphanage was designed by the prolific architect Alexandre Vallaury (1850–1921) as a luxury hotel and casino for the Compagnie Internationale des Wagons-Lits, the European passenger train company that operated the Orient Express. However, Sultan Abdul Hamid II would not issue a permit for its operation, leading to the sale of the building in 1903. It was purchased by the wife of a prominent Greek banker, who donated the complex to the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, which operated it as an orphanage.The orphanage, which housed as many as 1,000 boys at its peak, was closed in 1964. After almost half a century of neglect it is now in a state of heavy disrepair.

Page 93: Istanbul politecture
Page 94: Istanbul politecture
Page 95: Istanbul politecture
Page 96: Istanbul politecture
Page 97: Istanbul politecture
Page 98: Istanbul politecture
Page 99: Istanbul politecture
Page 100: Istanbul politecture
Page 101: Istanbul politecture

Marvel; Innovation

Page 102: Istanbul politecture
Page 103: Istanbul politecture
Page 104: Istanbul politecture
Page 105: Istanbul politecture
Page 106: Istanbul politecture
Page 107: Istanbul politecture
Page 108: Istanbul politecture
Page 109: Istanbul politecture

http://es.gizmodo.com/casas-fascinantes-y-probablemente-ilegales-construida-1148236547

Page 110: Istanbul politecture
Page 111: Istanbul politecture