IST programme INTEGRATED PROGRAMME PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS 2004

download IST programme INTEGRATED PROGRAMME PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS 2004

If you can't read please download the document

description

IST programme INTEGRATED PROGRAMME PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS 2004. Outline of presentation. Why IPPA 2004 ? Main findings Facts and figures Portfolio Reinforce European strengths Exploit new opportunities Ensure the co-evolution of technology and applications - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of IST programme INTEGRATED PROGRAMME PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS 2004

  • IST programme

    INTEGRATED PROGRAMME PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS 2004

  • Outline of presentationWhy IPPA 2004 ?Main findingsFacts and figuresPortfolioReinforce European strengths Exploit new opportunitiesEnsure the co-evolution of technology and applicationsFuture visions and emerging technologies (FET) Support infrastructure developmentSWOT analysisThe futurePortfolio analysis and impact observatory

  • WHY IPPA 2004 ?Contribute to impact analysis Help define priorities for IST WP 2005-06 Contribute to IST priorities in FP7

    Consolidation of call 1 and call 2 statistical analysis Snapshot of the project portfolio for each SO# of projects by instrument and budgetBudget distribution (%) per participating countryBudget for top 20 beneficiariesBudget per organisation typeObjectives and planned deliverables For each SO, coverage in terms of effort, actors and expected impact SWOT analysis.

  • Facts and Figures Call 1Closed April 2003 funding 1070m236 projects negotiated and launchedCall 2Closed October 2003 funding 525m148 projects under negotiation or launchedJoint Call with production technologies Closed April 2003 funding 60mFET (Future and Emerging technologies) OpenContinuous call funding 60m

  • IST Calls 2003-04 : Implementation 1,9 out of 3,8 Billion spent in calls in 2003-04More than 400 projects supported Out of 2500 proposals receivedMore than 6500 participations

    Oversubscription

    Funding per Instrument IST Calls 1 & 2

  • Participation (I)

    Chart1

    2.46972174173.1822850857

    5.23674854914.4902543883

    0.34891187680.2922317128

    0.43985183740.4657037526

    1.63815907191.3608292476

    0.11074642350.0734290417

    2.13567665212.3660858907

    14.627584136513.9151616077

    18.062388625922.1910089141

    6.88837339463.9660179197

    0.45526214750.7446491324

    1.31116585041.0567266015

    12.117571191110.1204598434

    0.08755478530.0547003275

    0.04866336450.1039850783

    0.25697774920.0662914455

    0.00663463480.0367251596

    4.81427578364.3850103772

    0.60789176891.0528176056

    1.37993367581.1763208277

    0.11063043040.0475829763

    0.25443310420.3604479113

    6.75242907755.9278705148

    2.84598726193.7838886461

    16.284752848812.0009765099

    FP5

    FP6 (Call 1+2)

    Funding per MS (%) - FP5/FP6

    FP5

    FP5 (from 5 Y assessment report)#projectsBudget%FP5%FP6

    OtherOther4712,520,8700.3758631764Other1.32156429

    MSAUSTRIA30682,272,1322.4697217417Austria3.1822850857

    MSBELGIUM548174,448,1825.2367485491Belgium4.4902543883

    MSCYPRUS6911,623,0600.3489118768Cyprus0.2922317128

    MSCZECH REPUBLIC11114,652,4800.4398518374Czech Republic0.4657037526

    MSDENMARK21654,570,8601.6381590719Denmark1.3608292476

    MSESTONIA323,689,2190.1107464235Estonia0.0734290417

    MSFINLAND27871,144,3192.1356766521Finland2.3660858907

    MSFRANCE1,166487,278,59214.6275841365France13.9151616077

    MSGERMANY1,367601,699,85818.0623886259Germany22.1910089141

    MSGREECE600229,467,6186.8883733946Greece3.9660179197

    MSHUNGARY12015,165,8330.4552621475Hungary0.7446491324

    MSIRELAND20343,677,9611.3111658504Ireland1.0567266015

    MSITALY1,117403,664,26712.1175711911Italy10.1204598434

    MSLATVIA322,916,6520.0875547853Latvia0.0547003275

    MSLITHUANIA281,621,0890.0486633645Lithuania0.1039850783

    MSLUXEMBOURG518,560,5220.2569777492Luxembourg0.0662914455

    MSMALTA5221,0150.0066346348Malta0.0367251596

    MSNETHERLANDS548160,374,6394.8142757836Netherlands4.3850103772

    MSPOLAND16120,250,2780.6078917689Poland1.0528176056

    MSPORTUGAL25045,968,7761.3799336758Portugal1.1763208277

    MSSLOVAKIA353,685,3550.1106304304Slovakia0.0475829763

    MSSLOVENIA788,475,7540.2544331042Slovenia0.3604479113

    MSSPAIN749224,938,9996.7524290775Spain5.9278705148

    MSSWEDEN35694,806,4052.8459872619Sweden3.7838886461

    MSUNITED KINGDOM1,245542,482,70716.2847528488United Kingdom12.0009765099

    ASICELAND000Iceland0.0200793434

    ASISRAEL000Israel1.3453827252

    ASLIECHTEN000Liechten0.0076780314

    ASNORWAY000Norway1.463485366

    ASSwitzerland000Switzerland1.8048209062

    ACCBULGARIA666,213,0140.1865080603Bulgaria0.2261229113

    ACCROMANIA644,840,3710.14530278Romania0.158997968

    ACCTurkey000Turkey0.4304079403

    3,331,230,827

    FP6

    StateCall 1Call 2Call 1 + call 2%

    ATMSAustriaAT31334084.54600272355700054891084.54600273.1822850857

    BEMSBelgiumBE56786185.02619182066600077452185.02619184.4902543883

    BGACCBulgariaBG1021383.3742510128790003900383.374251010.2261229113

    CYMSCyprusCY3963690.9577406910770005040690.957740690.2922317128

    CZMSCzech RepublicCZ5394901.9463329626380008032901.946332960.4657037526

    DKMSDenmarkDK17077879.1646754639500023472879.16467541.3608292476

    EEMSEstoniaEE362574.0584615399040001266574.058461540.0734290417

    FIMSFinlandFI23190503.33344441762200040812503.33344442.3660858907

    FRMSFranceFR157263962.74416582758000240021962.74416513.9151616077

    DEMSGermanyDE223948660.510129158823000382771660.51012922.1910089141

    GRMSGreeceGR45498655.03790142291100068409655.03790143.9660179197

    HUMSHungaryHU7375417.57452372546900012844417.57452370.7446491324

    ISASIcelandIS324347.6419512222000346347.641951220.0200793434

    IEMSIrelandIE12352427.0423107587500018227427.04231071.0567266015

    ILASIsraelIL19002442.8327222420400023206442.83272221.3453827252

    ITMSItalyIT110001331.94815964566000174567331.94815910.1204598434

    LVMSLatviaLV181523.355789474762000943523.3557894740.0547003275

    LIASLiechtenLI13243801324380.0076780314

    LTMSLithuaniaLT747633.68571428610460001793633.685714290.1039850783

    LUMSLuxembourgLU95645818700011434580.0662914455

    MTMSMaltaMT597470.53598014936000633470.5359801490.0367251596

    NLMSNetherlandsNL45605836.06814553003100075636836.06814554.3850103772

    NOASNorwayNO15558589.6836191968500025243589.68361911.463485366

    OthersOtherOtherOthers17994599.7730325480100022795599.77303251.32156429

    PLMSPolandPL7173000.95694771098700018160000.95694771.0528176056

    PTMSPortugalPT11508302.1782305878200020290302.17823051.1763208277

    ROACCRomaniaRO1924548.410924338180002742548.410924330.158997968

    SKMSSlovakiaSK385756.50245614435000820756.502456140.0475829763

    SIMSSloveniaSI4136348.9312184320810006217348.931218430.3604479113

    ESMSSpainES66176557.423747836073000102249557.4237485.9278705148

    SEMSSwedenSE35792115.83314612947600065268115.83314613.7838886461

    CHASSwitzerlandCH10579270.22979212055200031131270.22979211.8048209062

    TRACCTurkeyTR4028086.1525739933960007424086.152573990.4304079403

    UKMSUnited KingdomUK117520274.75971989484000207004274.75971912.0009765099

    1055897258.226689980001724895258.22

    Sheet4

    FP5 (from 5 Y assessment report)%FP5%FP6#projects call 1+2

    FP5FP6 (Call 1+2)

    MSAUSTRIA2.46972174173.1822850857176

    MSBELGIUM5.23674854914.4902543883257

    MSCYPRUS0.34891187680.292231712822

    MSCZECH REPUBLIC0.43985183740.465703752637

    MSDENMARK1.63815907191.360829247699

    MSESTONIA0.11074642350.073429041713

    MSFINLAND2.13567665212.3660858907140

    MSFRANCE14.627584136513.9151616077680

    MSGERMANY18.062388625922.1910089141939

    MSGREECE6.88837339463.9660179197221

    MSHUNGARY0.45526214750.744649132474

    MSIRELAND1.31116585041.056726601586

    MSITALY12.117571191110.1204598434583

    MSLATVIA0.08755478530.054700327513

    MSLITHUANIA0.04866336450.103985078319

    MSLUXEMBOURG0.25697774920.06629144557

    MSMALTA0.00663463480.03672515966

    MSNETHERLANDS4.81427578364.3850103772244

    MSPOLAND0.60789176891.052817605685

    MSPORTUGAL1.37993367581.176320827771

    MSSLOVAKIA0.11063043040.047582976310

    MSSLOVENIA0.25443310420.360447911332

    MSSPAIN6.75242907755.9278705148388

    MSSWEDEN2.84598726193.7838886461214

    MSUNITED KINGDOM16.284752848812.0009765099649

    ASICELAND00.0200793434

    ASISRAEL01.3453827252

    ASLIECHTEN00.0076780314

    ASNORWAY01.463485366

    ASSwitzerland01.8048209062

    ACCBULGARIA0.18650806030.2261229113

    ACCROMANIA0.145302780.158997968

    ACCTurkey00.4304079403

    OtherOther0.37586317641.32156429

    Sheet4

    FP5

    FP6 (Call 1+2)

    Funding per MS (%) - FP5/FP6

    Sheet3

    FP5 (from 5 Y assessment report)#projectsBudget%FP5%FP6#projects call 1+2

    OtherOther4712,520,8700.3758631764Other1.32156429

    MSAUSTRIA30682,272,1322.4697217417Austria3.1822850857176

    MSBELGIUM548174,448,1825.2367485491Belgium4.4902543883257

    MSCYPRUS6911,623,0600.3489118768Cyprus0.292231712822

    MSCZECH REPUBLIC11114,652,4800.4398518374Czech Republic0.465703752637

    MSDENMARK21654,570,8601.6381590719Denmark1.360829247699

    MSESTONIA323,689,2190.1107464235Estonia0.073429041713

    MSFINLAND27871,144,3192.1356766521Finland2.3660858907140

    MSFRANCE1,166487,278,59214.6275841365France13.9151616077680

    MSGERMANY1,367601,699,85818.0623886259Germany22.1910089141939

    MSGREECE600229,467,6186.8883733946Greece3.9660179197221

    MSHUNGARY12015,165,8330.4552621475Hungary0.744649132474

    MSIRELAND20343,677,9611.3111658504Ireland1.056726601586

    MSITALY1,117403,664,26712.1175711911Italy10.1204598434583

    MSLATVIA322,916,6520.0875547853Latvia0.054700327513

    MSLITHUANIA281,621,0890.0486633645Lithuania0.103985078319

    MSLUXEMBOURG518,560,5220.2569777492Luxembourg0.06629144557

    MSMALTA5221,0150.0066346348Malta0.03672515966

    MSNETHERLANDS548160,374,6394.8142757836Netherlands4.3850103772244

    MSPOLAND16120,250,2780.6078917689Poland1.052817605685

    MSPORTUGAL25045,968,7761.3799336758Portugal1.176320827771

    MSSLOVAKIA353,685,3550.1106304304Slovakia0.047582976310

    MSSLOVENIA788,475,7540.2544331042Slovenia0.360447911332

    MSSPAIN749224,938,9996.7524290775Spain5.9278705148388

    MSSWEDEN35694,806,4052.8459872619Sweden3.7838886461214

    MSUNITED KINGDOM1,245542,482,70716.2847528488United Kingdom12.0009765099649

    ASICELAND000Iceland0.0200793434

    ASISRAEL000Israel1.3453827252

    ASLIECHTEN000Liechten0.0076780314

    ASNORWAY000Norway1.463485366

    ASSwitzerland000Switzerland1.8048209062

    ACCBULGARIA666,213,0140.1865080603Bulgaria0.2261229113

    ACCROMANIA644,840,3710.14530278Romania0.158997968

    ACCTurkey000Turkey0.4304079403

    3,331,230,827

  • Participation (II)

  • IST Calls 2003-04 : ParticipationIndustryAcademiaNon-profit org.

  • Participants Highlights

    Organisations from Germany #1 in 15 out of 23 SOsThe Fraunhofer Ges. Institutes in top 20 in 21 SOs University of Karlsruhe best funded university Italian organisations #1 in 4 SOs France #1 in 3 SOs

    Industry top participants : Philips, CEA, Alcatel, Telefonica, France Telecom, Siemens, Ericsson and Nokia

  • Top 20 participantsFRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFT INTERUNIVERSITAIR MICRO-ELECTRONICA CENTRUM VZWDAIMLERCHRYSLER AGCOMMISSARIAT A L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUESIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFTFRANCE TELECOMCENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUEUNIVERSITAET KARLSRUHE (TH)TELEFONICA STMICROELECTRONICS SAPHILIPS ELECTRONICS NEDERLAND B.V.BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLCINSTITUTE OF COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTER SYSTEMSINFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AGTECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLANDCONSIGLIO NAZIONALE DELLE RICERCHEKUNGLIGA TEKNISKA HOEGSKOLANDFKI GMBHTHALES COMMUNICATIONS S.A.UNIVERSITAT POLITECNICA DE CATALUNYA

  • IST Calls 2003-04 : ConcentrationConcentration of effort and building critical mass Total number of projects selected : 3 times less than FP5 for an equivalent budgetAverage budget of Integrated Projects : 5 times larger than FP5 projects Setting up & managing larger projects : a challenge

    Chart5

    1.6279069767

    4.3

    2

    9

    6

    1

    Average project funding

    Average funding per project

    FP5 all instrumentsFP6 averageFP6 STREPFP6 IPFP6 NoEFP6 CA/SSA

    1.62790697674.32961

    Average funding per project

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    Average project funding

    Average number of participants

    FP5 all instrumentsFP6 averageFP6 STREPFP6 IPFP6 NoEFP6 CAFP6 SSA

    102492533126

    Average number of participants

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    Average number of participants FP5-FP6

    Sheet3

  • IST Calls 2003-04 : IntegrationMore intensive collaboration between various actorsIntegrated Projects: 2-3 times as many partners per projectFrom industry, academia and public research labs Concern over SME participationIntegration of effort in an enlarged Europe importantInternational co-operation

    Chart4

    10

    24

    9

    25

    33

    12

    6

    Average number of participants FP5-FP6

    Average funding per project

    FP5 all instrumentsFP6 averageFP6 STREPFP6 IPFP6 NoEFP6 CA/SSA

    1.62790697674.32961

    Average funding per project

    Average project funding

    Average number of participants

    FP5 all instrumentsFP6 averageFP6 STREPFP6 IPFP6 NoEFP6 CAFP6 SSA

    102492533126

    Average number of participants

    Average number of participants FP5-FP6

    Sheet3

  • Lessons for WP 2005-06 preparationLarge oversubscription in some fieldsNetworked Government, Networked Business, ICT forHealth, Technology Enhanced Learning/ Access to Cultural Heritage, software, Risk Management and Mobile applications: Around 10%Low SMEs participationCall1: 16%; Call2: 17%NoEs : 7%; IPs: 15%; STREPs: 24%

    Integration of the ICT research effort in an enlarged EuropeParticipation of Member States that joined the EU recently and of Associated Candidate Countries below expectations (3 to 4%)

    International co-operationDomain-specific approaches are needed

  • Lessons on new instrumentsObservations coherent with conclusions of the Marimon panel.Further concentration More ambitious proposals (IPs)STREPs continue to be a flexible and well understood instrument

    Issues concerning NoEs:

    governing rules optimal size of NoEs.added-value wrt co-ordination actions or SSAs.budgeting rules practical implementation of lasting integration.integration across disciplines or across borders. lack of industrial involvement in NoEs.

  • Portfolio analysis450 MEuros420 MEuros120 MEuros130 MEuros480 MEuros

  • Defining the SOs: Five main groups (1)Reinforce leadership where Europe has demonstrated strengths, e.g.mobile communications and services, broadband communicationsmicro-opto electronics & systems, networked audiovisual systems... Seize new opportunities that arise from the AmI vision and address weaknesses / threats critical for its realisation, e.g.multimodal interfaces, semantic-based knowledge handling,.. embedded systems,... Knowledge and computing GRIDs, Security and dependability,

  • Defining the SOs: five main groups (2) Continued support to leading / challenging applications, responding to emerging needs, e.g.eHealth, eInclusion, eLearning and culture, Entertainment and leisure contentbusiness support tools, networked organisations,... Support to research at the frontier of knowledgeFET open FET proactiveCognitive systemsSupport to infrastructure developmentResearch networking test bedsOpen development platformsIST for safety in transport, risk management,..

  • Reinforce leadership where Europe has demonstrated strengthMicroelectronicsMicrosystemsMobile and broadband communicationsAudio-visual systems and consumer electronicsObjective : maintain and further develop Europes position on the global scale

    improved structuring of research activities continuity of action standards and open environmentspushing the limits of technology

  • Focus CMOS Post CMOS: 89 MEuros

    2 CA

    1%

    2 IP

    53%

    2 NOE

    20%

    3 SSA

    1%

    7 STREP

    25%

  • FP 6-IST Call 1: Processes, Materials, Equipment & Devices - A European Nano-Electronics ClusterNanoCMOS & SINANOSi Processes & Devices for features down to 10 nmAltern. BEopto on Si(PICMOS)Altern. FE Ge & high k(ET4US)New MemoryConcepts(Nosce Memorias)Materials & Defects

    Nano Devices &ArchitecturesVirtual300mm(Fl.Wafer)012 projects of ca. 89 M funding...Design&Technol.for compound PAs(TARGET)More Moore EUV 45/32/22 nm node

    Litho-Metrology(Ocsli)

  • Example: IP NANOCMOSFunding: 24.17 million euro (first phase of 27 months)Partners: STMicroelectronics, Philips, Infineon, IMEC, CEA-LETI, CNRS, FhG-IISB, ZFM, IBS, Isiltec, Magwel, ACIES.Objectives:keeping Europe at the forefront of nano-electronics pushing the limits of semiconductor performance and densitypioneering changes in materials, process modules, device architectures and interconnections, modelling and simulation work. demonstrating the feasibility of 45nm CMOS technologiesexploratory research on critical issues for 32nm and 22nm technologiesaims at pilot manufacturing of 45nm technology in 2008-09Part of a coordinated strategic effort: MEDEA+ proposal for second phase (integration and validation 45nm CMOS 300mm wafer) links with SINANO Network-of-Excellence (9,9 M funding, 3 years, 43 partners)

  • ADEQUAT-11992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 20050.35mm FE; 0.35mm BEADEQUAT-20.25mm FE; 0.35mm BE0.18mm FE; 0.25mm BEACE0.18-0.15mm FE; 0.18mm BEHUNTARTEMIS65 nm FENANOCMOS45demo+ 32/22 studies, followed by MEDEA+ 45 nm full int.ADEQUAT +COINADEQUATDAMASCENECopper inter.100 nm FEMEDEA+ T20190 nm Full IntegrNESTORULISSECu/low k45/32/22 FEMEDEA+ T20765 nm Full Integr.Some Key European Technology Projects

  • Mobile and Wireless Systems beyond 3G 102 MEuro

    7 IP

    69%

    3 NOE

    10%

    3 SSA

    1%

    8 STREP

    20%

  • Different Cycles of InnovationNetworksRadioLong cycles up to a decadeInvestigation and test of new radio technologyRegulation and allocation of spectrumDevelopment of radio productsMedium cycles several yearsfor IP based functions (e.g. for mobility)Short cycles up to ~ a yearDynamic evolution of servicesRegular updates of targets requiredServicesSystems B3G in NetworksRadioLong cycles up to a decadeInvestigation and test of new radio technologyRegulation and allocation of spectrumDevelopment of radio productsMedium cycles several yearsfor IP-based functions (e.g. for mobility)Migration to IPv6 will take longerShort cycles up to a yearDynamic evolution of servicesRegular updates of targets requiredServicesoperationSource: Mobile Technology Platform

  • Mobile and Wireless Systems beyond 3GEnd to end service delivery/ConvergenceDAIDALOSSatellite overlay network MAESTRO SATNEX (NoE)Dynamic network composition WWI AMBIENT Personal Area networks MAGNETSmart Antennas ACE (NoE)Re-configurable radio and networks E2RUWB systems PULSERS

    New Radio access for terrestrial systems Beyond 3GWINNER NEWCOM (NoE)

    New instrumentscoverage

  • Daidaloswirelesswirelessinfrastructureinfrastructuread hocad hocfixedfixedDVB-T W-CDMA TD-CDMA Ethernet WLAN Bluetooth MobilityPricingPricingManagementNetworkNetwork managementAdaptationContentAdaptationContentInformationcontextInformationcontextMobilityMobilitySignallingBroadcastMulticastBroadcastMulticastInformationLocationLocation informationA4CQoSQoSMeteringMeteringResourceMonitoringResourceManagementSecuritySecurityA4CService ProvisioningApplication / ContentRules and policy engine Context inference engine Personalisation user interfacesPlatform for Pervasive Applications MultimediaTelephony-SIPConferencingMobile data transferSession migration Access TechnologiesPervasive services framework and APIPersonalised information deliveryand communicationContext adaptationMobile IPv6

  • Broadband for All 85.4 MEuro

    2 CA

    3%

    4 IP

    57%

    2 NOE

    9%

    1 SSA

    1%

    9 STREP

    30%

  • Broadband Projects CoverageOptical CoreNetwork TechnologiesBroadband Access TechnologiesNOBEL (IP)LASAGNE

  • Explore new opportunities that will lead to future markets

    Opto-electronicsEmbedded technologies Semantic-based knowledge systemsDisplay technologies Intelligent interfaces and environments Security-related developments GRID research

  • Opto-electronics and Photonics 56 MEuro13.5% SME estimate: 13%

  • CoverageH. RajbenbachOPTIMIST-EPIC-COST, Athens 2004

  • Active components(Lasers and LED)Active / passive integration(Photonic Integrated circuits)Microelec / Photonic integrationNanophotonics, Photonic crystalsPassive componentsPhotonics: Technology coverage16 selected proposals

  • Research:Terahertz Sensing & Imaging for:- Biotechnology (bio molecule and DNA sensing)- Healthcare (medical imaging) - Security (access control, explosives, bio-agents)- Process Monitoring (micro- nanoelectronics)Partnership:Large Industry (BAe Systems, Evotec, Renishaw, Thales)SMES (Alpes Lasers, Femtolasers, TeraView)Universities (Aachen, Delft, Durham, Leeds, Neuchatel, FreiburgParis-VII, Pisa, Wien)Contract:IP, 4 years, 5 M grant

    Example: TERANOVAH. Rajbenbach

  • Embedded systems 58 MEuro

  • IP Example: DECOS (19 Partners )Industrial Partners: Audi Electronics Venture, Airbus, EADS, Infineon, TTTech, Fiat, Profactor, Hella, Liebherr, Thales, EsterelResearch Centers:ARC Seibersdorf (Co-ordinator), SP Swedish Test. & Res. Inst.Universities: TU Vienna, TU Darmstadt, TU Hamburg, Uni Kassel, Uni Kiel, Uni BudapestDuration: 3 Years, Budget: 14.3 Mio EU Funding: 9 Mio

  • DECOS MotivationElectronic Hardware Cost Reduction (fewer ECUs, cables, connectors)Enhanced Dependability by Design (clear partitioning of safety-critical and non safety-critical subsystems by design)Reduced Development Costs (modular certification, reuse of software components, structured integration forcommunication & computational elements)Diagnosis and Maintenance (diagnosis of transient and intermittent component failures)Intellectual Property (IP) ProtectionFacilitate the systematic design & deployment of integrated electronic subsystems in embedded systems through:

  • DECOS Application AreasAutomotiveAerospaceRailwaysIndustrial ControlMedical SystemsAutonomous SystemsDECOS will develop structured guidelines for domain-independant and technology independent integration.

  • New opportunities: Focus Semantic-based knowledge systems 73 MEuro

  • Leading and challenging applications responding to emerging needs

    e-Government e-Business ICT for health caree-Inclusione-Safety e-Learninge-Culture Objective:

    Exploit new markets that will emerge from the deployment of societal applications Bring technology closer to peoples needs

  • EGov/eBusiness

  • EGov/eBusiness participationeBusinesseGovernment

  • Leading applications: Focus eGovernmentMaturityText-to-Speech and Speech Synthesis*

  • FP6 Integrated ProjectICT functionalities to deliver an Integrated Open System City Platform (IOSCP).. e-Inclusion Local eGovernment Interface based on XML, XSL, VRML, eGIF & other standards Decision and analysis system supported by GIS and other analysis tools such as data mining, etc. Integrated multi-dimensional database with intelligent information management. Includes: spatial data for buildings and land, economic, social, and environmental data. e-Mobility System e-Land Use System e-Admin System - Integrated Open System City Platform Wired System Wireless System Project Number 507860

  • eHealth

  • FETOpenProactive

  • Conclusion: SWOT analysis (I)StrengthsFP6 orientations have been well received Focus on Europes major strengths continues FET remains an incubator From short-term to long term and from generic to applied research. WeaknessesHigh oversubscription in some fieldsSME participation Participation of New Member StatesParticipation of third countries

  • Conclusion: SWOT analysis (II)Opportunities

    Multi-disciplinarity New Member States Embedding of ICT in applicationsImpact on EU-wide policiesKey technologies will help solve trust and security challengesFET as a pathfinder

    Threats

    New instruments need new and adequate ways of management and monitoringInvolvement of SMEsIPR issues in large consortia Concentration on short term issuesRole and performance of NoEs in some areas.Fragmented value chains, still more integration..Different innovation cycles

  • Next stepsStatistics: need to be refined

    Content: analysis needs to be deepened: More semantics

    IPPA as an integral part of wider Impact Analysis

    SWOTCentre piece: - NanoCMOS (IP)- processes for CMOS logic for 45nm node + demo, training, dissemination. Plus basic work for 32 and 22 nm nodes,Sinano (NoE)- nanoscale CMOS and post-CMOS logic+memory devices, More Moore (IP) industrial modules for 45 nm EUV litho, explore 32 & 22 nm nodes;Satellites complementing the core work:(clockwise)- Flying wafer (SSA)- infrastructure for seamless 300 mm wafer flow across Europe,- Nano-Arch-Review (SSA) - studying architectures for post-CMOS devices;- EuroSOI+CADRE (CAs)- looking into substrate materials and defect influencing performance of advanced and post CMOS;- ET4US (Strep)- Frontend alternatives to Si and conv. gate stack (Ge, compound s/c and high k) to overcome resp. carrier mobility and reliability of thin SiO2;- Nosce Memorias (Strep) - overcome scaling limits of memories (based on organics and ferro-electrics);Target (NoE)- foci on design + technol.of high P + high f amplifiers (PAs) based on compound s/c ; Ocsli (Strep) Overlay control for 65 nm node and beyond;- PICMOS (Strep)- overcome the signal delay issues of global interconnects by using optical wiring with InP based sources + detectors on top of CMOS;

    29Ein paar Eckdaten zum DECOS ProjektForschungszentrum Seibersdorf ist Koordinator18 Partner im KonsortiumIndustrie: Audi, Fiat, Airbus, EADS, Infineon, TTTech, Esterel, Hella, Liebherr, Profactor, Thales AvionicsUniversitten: TU Wien, TU Darmstadt, TU Hamburg-Harburg, Universitt Kassel, Universitt Budapest, SP Swedish National Testing and Research InstitueGesamtkosten: 15 20 MFrderung: 10 12MProjektlaufzeit: 3 Jahre Formale Entscheidung der EU: Februar 2004, Voraussichtlicher Start Mitte 2004Since 1999, governments worldwide have made significant investments in information and communications technology. Much of this expenditure has been to improve services to citizens and enterprises, as opposed to automating established processes. This is driving a new wave of investments to support process transformation, more focus on constituents and real-time enablement. As with any industry, the relative maturity of a given government technology can vary substantially between areas such as tax management, social security, healthcare or defense. Technology may have a different effect on government employees than it has on citizens. It can also be affected by geography. The technologies on this Hype Cycle are those that are likely to have a direct impact on the way IT supports and shapes government processes during the next decade.

    Strategic Imperative: Governments must continue exploring and piloting the adoption of those technologies that support key political initiatives and constituent imperatives.