ISSUER COMMENT - NC Treasurer Issuer Comment 04-26-2017...ISSUER COMMENT 26 April 2017 ... than half...

3
U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE ISSUER COMMENT 26 April 2017 Contacts Pisei Chea 212-553-0344 Analyst [email protected] Genevieve Nolan 212-553-3912 VP-Senior Analyst [email protected] North Carolina (State of) Boost to Rainy Day Fund is Credit Positive On April 13, North Carolina (Aaa stable) Governor Roy Cooper signed into law a measure that will improve funding of the state's main budget reserve. The law, House Bill 7, requires an annual transfer to the state’s Savings Reserve, or Rainy Day Fund, equal to 15% of each fiscal year’s estimated growth in state tax revenues that are deposited into the General Fund. North Carolina's reserves have been below average and the measure, along with recent discretionary transfers to the Rainy Day Fund, will improve the state's financial flexibility and its ability to respond to future contingencies. North Carolina's available reserves were below the Aaa median and the 50-state median for the past 10 years (see Exhibit 1). Fiscal 2015 reserves were 2.9% of operating revenues, less than half the Aaa median of 6.5% and also lower than the 50-state median of 5.6%. The state has regularly made transfers to its Rainy Day Fund, though it was not required to do so prior to House Bill 7. In fiscal 2016, available reserves increased substantially to $1.6 billion, or 6.7% of operating revenues, after the state recorded a General Fund operating surplus of more than $1 billion. As a result, $473.6 million was transferred to the Rainy Day Fund, in addition to $250 million that was transferred from the Repairs and Renovations Reserve. The transfers stemmed from a policy decision to significantly boost the Rainy Day Fund, aiming to better prepare the state for future economic downturns and unexpected weather events. Exhibit 1 North Carolina's Reserves Grow Closer to State Medians Available Reserves as a % of Operating Revenues -8% -6% -4% -2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016** North Carolina* 50-State Median Aaa Median *North Carolina's available reserves equal the total unassigned General Fund balance, which includes the Rainy Day Fund; operating revenues are equal to own-source General Fund revenues plus net transfers in. **2016 median is pro forma, based on the 44 states that have published CAFRS to date. Sources: State CAFRs and Moody's Investors Service

Transcript of ISSUER COMMENT - NC Treasurer Issuer Comment 04-26-2017...ISSUER COMMENT 26 April 2017 ... than half...

Page 1: ISSUER COMMENT - NC Treasurer Issuer Comment 04-26-2017...ISSUER COMMENT 26 April 2017 ... than half the Aaa median of 6.5% and also lower than the 50 ... North Carolina CAFRs and

U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE

ISSUER COMMENT26 April 2017

Contacts

Pisei Chea [email protected]

Genevieve Nolan 212-553-3912VP-Senior [email protected]

North Carolina (State of)Boost to Rainy Day Fund is Credit Positive

On April 13, North Carolina (Aaa stable) Governor Roy Cooper signed into law a measurethat will improve funding of the state's main budget reserve. The law, House Bill 7, requiresan annual transfer to the state’s Savings Reserve, or Rainy Day Fund, equal to 15% of eachfiscal year’s estimated growth in state tax revenues that are deposited into the GeneralFund. North Carolina's reserves have been below average and the measure, along with recentdiscretionary transfers to the Rainy Day Fund, will improve the state's financial flexibility andits ability to respond to future contingencies.

North Carolina's available reserves were below the Aaa median and the 50-state median forthe past 10 years (see Exhibit 1). Fiscal 2015 reserves were 2.9% of operating revenues, lessthan half the Aaa median of 6.5% and also lower than the 50-state median of 5.6%.

The state has regularly made transfers to its Rainy Day Fund, though it was not required todo so prior to House Bill 7. In fiscal 2016, available reserves increased substantially to $1.6billion, or 6.7% of operating revenues, after the state recorded a General Fund operatingsurplus of more than $1 billion. As a result, $473.6 million was transferred to the Rainy DayFund, in addition to $250 million that was transferred from the Repairs and RenovationsReserve. The transfers stemmed from a policy decision to significantly boost the Rainy DayFund, aiming to better prepare the state for future economic downturns and unexpectedweather events.

Exhibit 1

North Carolina's Reserves Grow Closer to State MediansAvailable Reserves as a % of Operating Revenues

-8%

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016**

North Carolina* 50-State Median Aaa Median

*North Carolina's available reserves equal the total unassigned General Fund balance, which includes the Rainy Day Fund;operating revenues are equal to own-source General Fund revenues plus net transfers in.**2016 median is pro forma, based on the 44 states that have published CAFRS to date.Sources: State CAFRs and Moody's Investors Service

Page 2: ISSUER COMMENT - NC Treasurer Issuer Comment 04-26-2017...ISSUER COMMENT 26 April 2017 ... than half the Aaa median of 6.5% and also lower than the 50 ... North Carolina CAFRs and

MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE

An additional proposed transfer to the Rainy Day Fund in the governor's 2017-2019 biennium budget, which was created prior to thebill's passage, exceeds the amount required by the new law. Under the new law, the required biennial transfer is $213.3 million, whereasthe proposed budget includes a Rainy Day Fund transfer of $312.2 million and an additional $100 million for disaster relief. The budgetassumes a $494.3 million increase in General Fund tax revenues in fiscal 2018 and a $927.5 million increase in fiscal 2019.

North Carolina's long-standing goal for its Rainy Day Fund was to reach 8% of the prior year's General Fund appropriation budget. Thestate is close to achieving this target; the transfers in fiscal 2016 increased the Rainy Day Fund to 7.5% of the prior year's General Fundappropriation budget. Based on the new law and projected revenue increases, the state's Rainy Day Fund will reach 9% of the prioryear's General Fund appropriation budget by 2022 (see Exhibit 2). The new law stipulates that legislators will annually evaluate thefund's target balance. Therefore, should the Rainy Day Fund exceed its goal, the amount transferred to it would be reduced accordingly.Nonetheless, the new law will provide guidelines for current and future administrations, helping to maintain a steady level of reserves.The Rainy Day Fund has proven to be useful for disaster relief. A projected decline in reserves in fiscal 2017 reflects the use of funds forcontinued recovery from Hurricane Matthew and the western North Carolina wildfires last year.

Exhibit 2

North Carolina's Rainy Day Fund Will Steadily Increase Under New Law

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

10%

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017* 2018* 2019* 2020* 2021* 2022*

in m

illio

ns

Fiscal Year

Rainy Day Fund Balance (left axis) Rainy Day Fund as a % of Prior Year's General Fund Appropriation Budget (right axis)

*Projected; fiscal 2020-22 figures based on assumption that General Fund tax revenue growth will equal Office of State Budget and Management's projected total General Fund revenuegrowth rate of 3.6% per year.Sources: North Carolina CAFRs and Governor Roy Cooper's Recommended Budget 2017-2019

The new law also limits the use of the Rainy Day Fund to ensure that the fund is not exhausted in any one year. Any use of the fundscannot exceed 7.5% of the previous fiscal year's operating budget. Withdrawal of a higher amount would require a two-thirds majorityvote in the state House and Senate. Furthermore, the use of funds is restricted to making up for revenue losses, paying the costs of acourt order, or providing emergency disaster relief. According to a Pew Charitable Trusts report, prior to the law, North Carolina wasone of only six states that had a Rainy Day Fund but no defined conditions for withdrawal.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page onwww.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history.

2 26 April 2017 North Carolina (State of): Boost to Rainy Day Fund is Credit Positive

Page 3: ISSUER COMMENT - NC Treasurer Issuer Comment 04-26-2017...ISSUER COMMENT 26 April 2017 ... than half the Aaa median of 6.5% and also lower than the 50 ... North Carolina CAFRs and

MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE

© 2017 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDITRISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THERELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITYMAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGSDO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’SOPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVEMODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’SPUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOTPROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THESUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATIONAND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FORPURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FORRETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACTYOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW,AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTEDOR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANYPERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as wellas other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information ituses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However,MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for anyindirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use anysuch information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses ordamages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of aparticular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatorylosses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for theavoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents,representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCHRATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (includingcorporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating,agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintainpolicies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO andrated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually atwww.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s InvestorsService Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intendedto be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, yourepresent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly orindirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion asto the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be recklessand inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY’S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or otherprofessional adviser.

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’sOverseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a NationallyRecognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by anentity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registeredwith the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferredstock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it feesranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000.

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.

REPORT NUMBER 1070020

3 26 April 2017 North Carolina (State of): Boost to Rainy Day Fund is Credit Positive