Issue 11.3 NSCA’s June/July ‘12 Performance Training www ... · nsca’s performance training...
Transcript of Issue 11.3 NSCA’s June/July ‘12 Performance Training www ... · nsca’s performance training...
NSCA’s
TrainingJournal
Performance
FeaturesMethods for Training
Baseball PlayersMatthew DiLallo, MA,
CSCS, USAW-1
Fencing: A Motion Analysis of Attacks and
Common Exercises to Improve Speed
Sean M. Wells, PhD, DPT, PT, ATC/L, CSCS,
NSCA-CPT and Russell Hogg, PhD
Summer Games
Issue 11.3June/July ‘12
www.nsca.com
about thisPUBLICATION
NSCA’s
Performance TrainingJournal
2
The NSCA’s Performance Train-ing Journal (ISSN: 2157-7358) is a publication of the National Strength and Conditioning Asso-ciation (NSCA). The PTJ publishes basic educational information for Associate and Professional Members of the NSCA. These groups include novice personal trainers, novice strength coach-es, and training enthusiasts. The journal’s mission is to publish ar-ticles that provide basic, practi-cal information that is research-based.
Copyright 2012 by the National Strength and Conditioning Asso-ciation. All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer: The statements and comments in the NSCA’s Per-formance Training Journal are those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the National Strength and Con-ditioning Association. The ap-pearance of advertising in this journal does not constitute an endorsement for the quality or value of the product or ser-vice advertised, or of the claims made for it by its manufacturer or provider.
NSCA MissionAs the worldwide authority on strength and conditioning, we support and disseminate re-search-based knowledge and its practical application, to improve athletic performance and fitness.
Talk to us…Share your questions and com-ments. We want to hear from you. Write to the NSCA’s Perfor-mance Training Journal, NSCA, 1885 Bob Johnson Drive, Colo-rado Springs, CO 80906, or send an email to [email protected].
Editorial Office
1885 Bob Johnson DriveColorado Springs, Colorado 80906Phone: +1 719-632-6722
Editor T. Jeff Chandler, EdD,
CSCS,*D, NSCA-CPT,*D, FNSCAemail: [email protected]
Managing Editor Britt Chandler, MS,
CSCS,*D, NSCA-CPT,*Demail: [email protected]
Publisher Keith Cinea, MA, CSCS,*D,
NSCA-CPT,*Demail: [email protected]
Copy Editor Matthew Sandsteademail: [email protected]
Editorial Review Panel
Scott Cheatham, DPT, OCS, ATC, CSCS, NSCA-CPT
Meredith Hale-Griffin, MS, CSCS
Ed McNeely, MS
Mike Rickett, MS, CSCS
Chad D. Touchberry, PhD, CSCS
Joel Bergeron, MS, CSCS,*D
Nicole Dabbs, MS
Tyler Goodale, MS, CSCS
Samuel Gardner, MS, CSCS, USA-W Dual Certified:Level 1 Weightlifting Coach and Sports Performance Coach
Joshua West, MA, CSCS
Andy Khamoui, MS, CSCS
Scott Austin, MS, CSCS
Adam Feit, MS, CSCS
nsca’s performance training journal • www.nsca.com • volume 11 issue 3
tab
le o
fC
ON
TE
NT
S
3nsca’s performance training journal • www.nsca.com • volume 11 issue 3
departments
8 Methods for Training Baseball PlayersMatthew DiLallo, MA, CSCS, USAW-1This featured article examines traditional methods for training baseball players and uses recent
research to improve upon the traditional methods. This article then offers safe alternative train-
ing methods to optimize strength and power gains and focus training on the proper energy
systems to help prevent overuse injuries.
Fencing: A Motion Analysis of Attacks and Common Exercises to Improve SpeedSean M. Wells, PhD, DPT, PT, ATC/L, CSCS, NSCA-CPT and Russell Hogg, PhDA motion analysis of fencing movement patterns are detailed in this featured article. This
motion analysis proves that fencing athletes perform athletic actions from a stance that is
unique to the sport. Based on the unique physical requirements of the sport, common training
exercises appropriate for athletes engaged in the modern sporting form are also provided.
Summer Games
Personal Training for PerformanceGames and Drills for Improved PerformanceChat Williams, MS, CSCS,*D, NSCA-CPT,*D, PT-ARThis column defines the various motor
skills required by games and drills. The
difference between open and closed
agility games and drills is detailed as well
as examples to incorporate into a training
program.
Sport-Specific ConditioningSmall-Sided GamesPatrick McHenry, MA, CSCS,*D, USAW-1This column presents an innovative way
for coaches to apply small-sided games
to a team’s training program to improve
performance. Sample games are provided
but the amount of variations is limitless,
and coaches are encouraged to explore all
small-sided games.
Training TableMultivitamins for AthletesDebra Wein, MS, RD, LDN, CSSD, NSCA-CPT,*D and Courtney Hernandez, MS, RD, LDNAlthough there have been conflicting
studies about the benefits of supplement
use by Americans, many health experts
now recommend that most adults take a
daily multivitamin. This column will explore
the benefits of taking a daily multivitamin,
and explain how athletes’ vitamin needs
differ from that of average adults.
12
4
6
10
Chat Williams, MS, CSCS,*D, NSCA-CPT,*D, PT-AR
about theAUTHOR
personal trainingfor performance
4
Chat Williams is the
Supervisor for Norman
Regional Health Club.
He currently sits on the
National Strength and
Conditioning Association
Board of Directors and
is the past NSCA State
Director Committee
Chair, Midwest Regional
Coordinator and State
Director of Oklahoma
(2004 State Director of
the Year). He also served
on the NSCA Personal
Trainer SIG Executive
Council. He is the author
of multiple training DVDs.
He runs his own company,
Oklahoma Strength and
Conditioning Productions,
which offers personal
training services, sports
performance for youth,
metabolic testing, and
educational conferences
and seminars for strength
and conditioning
professionals.
nsca’s performance training journal • www.nsca.com • volume 11 issue 3
Motor Skills Defined Games and drills can improve multiple motor skills de-
pending on the selection and types of games incorpo-
rated. The following is a list of motor skills that may be
enhanced by games and drills:
• Agility: The ability of an individual to change
direction (quickly) or velocity of the body due to a
stimulus. Agility can be challenged by standard tests
including cones and ladders, or on the field or court
with games and drills.
• Balance: The ability to maintain the body’s position
over a fixed base of support (static) or while the
body is in motion, or challenged by a changing base
of support (dynamic). Three components that affect
balance are visual, the vestibular system (inner ear),
and proprioception.
• Coordination: The ability to move through a complex
set of movements while maintaining balance.
• Power: Measured by the rate at which work is per-
formed, or the amount of work performed in a given
time. Vertical jumps and broad jumps are tests that
can assess power.
• Reaction Time: The ability to react to a stimulus
involving the senses, usually auditory or visual in
regard to sport. Playing defense in basketball or
catching a line drive in baseball are examples chal-
lenging reaction time.
• Speed: The ability to cover a distance, or perform
a movement, in a short amount of time. A 40-yard
sprint is a common test to measure the speed of an
individual (1).
Closed vs. Open Agility Games and DrillsThere are several types of agility games and drills that a fit-
ness professional can incorporate into a training program
using cones, hurdles, ladders, medicine balls, and reac-
tion balls. Closed agility drills will maintain a consistent
and pre-determined pattern which may improve through
learned behavior and practice (2,3). Closed agility drills
may aid an individual in perfecting a technique within
a specific distance, diameter, or parameter. Many times
these drills include sprinting in a linear pattern with later-
al shuffling and backpedaling. Examples of closed agility
drills include the pro-agility drill, T-drill, L-drill, and specific
ladder drills. Open agility drills are performed in an ever-
changing environment, in a controlled chaos manner,
with limited restrictions (2,3). Examples of open agility
drills include dodge ball drills, medicine and reaction ball
drills, and mirroring-type drills. Initially, closed agility drills
can enhance performance by improving acceleration, de-
celeration, and body awareness. Once specific patterns
of the drills are mastered, open agility drills should be in-
troduced to increase difficultly. Open agility drills require
the individual to respond and react to unplanned external
stimuli or other movement patterns of an individual (3).
Drills and Games ExamplesT-Drill (Closed Agility) (Figures 1 – 5)The T-drill is a closed agility drill that focuses on linear
speed, lateral shuffling, and backpedaling. Layout consists
of four cones in the formation of a “T” with cone A as the
starting point, cone B 10 yards apart directly ahead, and
cones C and D 5 yards apart on the left and right side of
cone B. The individual starts at cone A. On the command
of the fitness professional, the individual sprints to cone B
and touches the cone with their right hand. The individual
will cut left and shuffle sideways to cone C, and touch the
cone, this time with their left hand. Then, they will decel-
erate and shuffle sideways to the right to cone D, touch-
ing the cone with their right hand. They decelerate again,
Games and Drills for Improved Performance
personal training for performance
5nsca’s performance training journal • www.nsca.com • volume 11 issue 3
Games and Drills for Improved Performance
shuffle back to cone B touching the cone with their left hand,
make a cut, and backpedal to cone A. Time is complete when
they pass cone A.
Cat and Mouse (Open Agility) (Figures 6 – 8) Cat and mouse is a mirroring-type drill that uses a velcro strap
fastened around the waist of each individual. The object of
the game is for the “mouse” to separate far enough away from
the cat so that the velcro strap in the middle of the two in-
dividuals releases. The game can be limited to lateral move-
ments in a specific range and distance, or can be opened up
to all movement patterns. The “cat” must do their best to
mimic and react to the movements of the mouse maintaining
close proximity.
Medicine Ball Tennis (Open Agility) (Figures 9 – 12)Medicine ball tennis is an open agility game played on the
tennis court; the same rules as tennis apply except the game
requires a rubber medicine ball that will bounce. The objec-
tive of the game is to return the ball over the net with minimal
steps (fast-paced) before the ball bounces twice. Overhead
throws and rotational throws may be used to return the ball.
If the ball bounces twice before caught and returned over the
net, the individual serving is awarded a point. The first person
to score 10 points (win by 2) is the winner. This can be modi-
fied depending on the desired duration of the game. Playing
rally points would be another modification to help speed up
the game. The size and the weight of the ball should be de-
termined by skill level, fitness level, and size of the individuals
playing. Adding a smaller racquetball or reaction ball to the
game may increase the difficulty of play for the individuals.
References1. Baechle, TR, and Earle, RW. Essentials of strength training
and conditioning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics 471–490,
2000.
2. Dawes, J. Creating open agility drills. Strength and
Conditioning Journal 30(5): 54–55, 2008.
3. Holmberg, P. Agility training for experienced athletes: A
dynamical systems approach. Strength and Conditioning
Journal 31(5): 73–78, 2009.
Figure 1: T-Drill – Set-Up
Figure 3: T-Drill – Shuffle Left
Figure 5: T-Drill – Backpedal and Finish
Figure 7: Cat and Mouse – Action
Figure 9: Medicine Ball Tennis – Rotational Throw
Figure 11: Medicine Ball Tennis – Overhead Throw
Figure 2: T-Drill – Start and Sprint
Figure 4: T-Drill – Shuffle Right
Figure 6: Cat and Mouse – Set-Up and Start
Figure 8: Cat and Mouse – Action
Figure 10: Medicine Ball Tennis – Rotational Throw
Figure 12: Medicine Ball Tennis – Overhead Slam
about theAUTHOR
nsca’s performance training journal • www.nsca.com • volume 11 issue 3 6
Patrick McHenry is the
Head Strength and
Conditioning Coach at
Castle View High School
in Castle Rock, CO. He
designs the lifting and
speed/agility programs
for all the weightlifting
classes as well as works
with the school’s 20
varsity sports. McHenry
earned a Master’s degree
is in Physical Education
with an emphasis in
Kinesiology from the
University of Northern
Colorado. He is a Certified
Strength and Conditioning
Specialist® with Distinction
with the National Strength
and Conditioning
Association. He is also
a Certified Club Coach
with USA Weightlifting.
McHenry has worked with
athletes from youth to
the elite-level in a wide
variety of sports. He has
presented at international
and national strength
coaches and physical
education conferences.
He is published in books,
journals, internet manuals
and videos.
sport-specificconditioning Patrick McHenry, MA, CSCS,*D, USAW-1
Coaches looking for an innovative way to train sport-
specific skills and movement patterns to improve player
performance can use small-sided games. The skills and
movement patterns developed in small-sided games have
been shown to be effective for “providing skill transfer to
a competitive environment,” thus, making athletes better
(2). Research has shown that small-sided games are also an
effective way to develop multidirectional movement pat-
terns used in games (3). Small-sided games can be used
with any sport and research has shown that it is beneficial
for soccer, volleyball, rugby, wrestling, basketball, hockey,
and tennis, to name a few. Small-sided games can be an
effective means for simulating the physiological demands
of the sport while reducing the risk of injuries (2).
When designing a small-sided game it does not have to
take a lot of planning by the coach. It can be as simple as
dividing a team into smaller teams and letting them play
with modified rules in a smaller area. Establishing param-
eters allows the coach to focus on specific skills needed to
be successful in the sport. The level of complexity depends
on the objective of the training session. From a coaching
perspective, every workout needs to have a purpose so
the athletes know what they are working on. If it is a res-
toration day to have some fun, the coach should let the
athletes know that. If there is a specific skill that is being
worked on, then the athletes need to know that as well.
Small-sided games can also be used in place of condition-
ing. It is important to make sure the athletes understand
the training objective when small-sided games replace
conditioning. Research has shown that high metabolic de-
mands of a small-sided game improved tactical strategies
used during a regular game (1).
Types of Small-Sided GamesTeam handball variationAn easy to use small-sided game is a modified version
of team handball. To set up the game, use the width of a
basketball court, indoor soccer goals (which can be made
from PVC pipe) and a volleyball or small soccer ball. Have
four or five players on each side with a goaltender for each
team. To work on eye-hand coordination, passing, and in-
duce more movement, implement a rule that once a play-
er catches the ball they may not take a step; they have to
pass. Thus, each team will have to work together to get the
ball to the other end of the court.
To speed up the game, a 30-s shot clock can be used. Varia-
tions for the game can include a three-step rule, or remov-
al of the goaltender position. If you do not have access to
goals, large 50-gal trashcans can be substituted.
King of the court: Volleyball variationEach player will find a partner. The coach will put one
team on one side of the net while the other team is on the
same side as the coach. The coach throws the ball to the
team on his side of the net and they must hit it three times
before it can be hit over the net to the other team. The
ball must be hit three times before it can go over the net.
Whichever team wins the point stays on the far side of the
net. The losing team rotates out and a new team moves to
the coach’s side of the net. If the team on the coach’s side
of the net does not hit the ball three times before hitting it
to their opponent’s side, they must rotate out and the new
team takes their place.
Short court soccerUsing half of a basketball court, goals are set on each side
so that the game is played on the width of the court. The
goals are approximately 3-ft wide. This will allow the play-
ers to focus on their footwork because their opponents
are closer to them. A variation could include the use of
a futsal ball, which is a smaller soccer ball that does not
bounce as much as a regular soccer ball.
These are three examples of small-sided games that can
be modified to meet your team’s training needs. There are
many more ways to manipulate the structure of the game
to meet the physiological training needs of the players.
Small-Sided Games
7nsca’s performance training journal • www.nsca.com • volume 11 issue 3
sport-specific conditioning
References1. Abdelkrim, N, Castagna, C, Fazaa, S, and Elati, J. The effect of players’
standard and tactical strategy on game demands in men’s basketball.
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 24(10): 2652–2662, 2010.
2. Gabbett, T, Jenkins, D, and Abernethy, B. Influence of wrestling on the
physiological and skill demands of small-sided games. Journal of Strength
and Conditioning Research 26(1): 113–120, 2012.
3. Jeffreys, I. The use of small-sided games in the metabolic training of high
school soccer players. Strength and Conditioning Journal 26(5): 77–78,
2004.
Small-Sided Games
feature
about theAUTHOR
Matthew DiLallo
graduated from the
University of Colorado in
2009 with a Bachelor of
Arts degree in Integrative
Physiology. DiLallo also
played five years of
collegiate football, four
as the starting punter
on the University of
Colorado football team.
He graduated from the
University of South
Florida with a Master of
Arts degree in Exercise
Science in 2011. DiLallo
is a Certified Strength
and Conditioning
Specialist®, and Level
1 USA Weightlifting
certified. He recently
completed an internship
with the Pittsburgh
Pirates in Bradenton, FL
and is currently working
at Athletic Edge Sports
in Lakewood Ranch,
FL training high school
athletes.
8nsca’s performance training journal • www.nsca.com • volume 11 issue 3
summer games
Matthew DiLallo, MA, CSCS, USAW-1
Physical qualities required to be a baseball player
are anaerobic power, anaerobic capacity, and to
a lesser degree, aerobic capacity. Baseball train-
ing should consist of methods to improve these quali-
ties (9). According to the principle of specificity, muscles
must be used in similar patterns and ways that they are
needed in order to make specific gains. It would make
sense then that the methods used for conditioning
baseball players should be similar to the demands of the
sport, and focus on developing the anaerobic energy
systems. However, the lack of adherence to specific sci-
entific information has led to a variety of conventional
and innovative techniques being used for the improve-
ment and maintenance of the physical conditioning of
baseball players with many programs not including an
anaerobic emphasis.
Traditional methods of training baseball players focus
on building a large aerobic base. Pitchers need an ad-
equate aerobic capacity to fully recover between their
intensive bouts of anaerobic power (e.g., pitching) and
position players need it between their anaerobic bouts
of power (e.g., sprinting the field, running the bases, and
swinging the bat). These anaerobic bouts are divided by
extended times of inactivity (9). The aerobic base was
traditionally developed using long-distance, continu-
ous running. However, research has shown that endur-
ance exercise lasting longer than 30 min has detrimen-
tal effects on power output (7,8). According to a study
published by Rhea and colleagues, endurance training
and power training are not compatible and should not
be trained at the same time for baseball players (7).
Endurance training has also been shown to decrease
muscle fiber size, muscle strength, and muscle power,
all of which are detrimental to a baseball athlete (4). So
how do baseball athletes build an aerobic base while
still maintaining power and strength? A study by Bur-
gomaster et al. showed that aerobic capacity can be in-
creased via high-intensity interval training rather than
through steady state, long aerobic training (2). A study
by Bulbulian et al. also showed that repeated sprints
with minimal rest intervals could increase VO2max
(3). An increase in VO2max correlates to an increase in
aerobic capacity. Current baseball conditioning activi-
ties should be directed away from traditional extended
aerobic endurance exercise and switched to interval-
type, repeated sprint conditioning. Tempo runs/tempo
throws are a great example of this type of training.
Power is defined as P=(force x displacement)/time. In-
creases in power can occur in two ways: increase the
ability to exert force (get stronger) or decrease the
amount of time it takes to exert the force (rate of force
development) (4,6). However, there is limitation to this
equation. The velocity of movement slows down as the
weight increases. Therefore, it is important to work in
the correct range of percent RM (repetition maximum)
that allows maximum power production to be utilized.
Due to the weight of a baseball ball (5 oz) and bat (32
– 36 oz), the velocity of the movement is of greater im-
portance than force due to their lighter weights (6). Ac-
cording to research by McEvoy et al., the optimal range
for this movement velocity while power training is 30
– 50% of one’s 1RM for a given exercise. Moving weights
in this range has been shown to maximize power de-
velopment for the given exercise (6). A safe alternative
is adding resistance bands to the barbell in order to
prevent the slowing down and concurrent muscle de-
activation near the end of the movement. Adding resis-
tance bands in this manner allows for greater use of the
stretch shortening cycle.
The stretch shortening cycle is an important compo-
nent in all running and throwing activities. As a muscle
is rapidly stretched, elastic energy is stored in the mus-
cle. This stored elastic energy can be used to produce
Methods for Training Baseball Players
9nsca’s performance training journal • www.nsca.com • volume 11 issue 3
a more powerful concentric contraction, which
results in a more powerful muscular contraction
overall. Based on this finding, it can be conclud-
ed that the use of this method of training may
contribute to increases in throwing and running
speed. The use of accommodated resistance
shortens the time in which the bar decelerates
as well as increases the amount of time spent
near peak velocity, therefore increasing the rate
of force development. It has been shown that
using resistance bands attached to a barbell sig-
nificantly increases one’s peak power and peak
force (4,6,9).
Pitchers and position players must train for both
strength and power, and throw the baseball
maximally with good mechanics. Research sug-
gests that most professional pitchers have some
degree of shoulder instability (5). Therefore, add-
ing heavy chest and overhead lifts could increase
shoulder instability and increase the risk of pos-
terior impingement syndrome. Furthermore,
the addition of extra pressing exercises could
cause further asymmetries and imbalances due
to the high volume of throwing performed (9).
To help avoid shoulder instability while training,
shoulder exercises should be performed after
exhausting the major muscle groups, or after a
throwing practice. This allows for concentration
on the small muscles of the rotator cuff when
lifting and helps avoid rotator cuff fatigue prior
to throwing or lifting (1). Due to the high vol-
ume of practices/games, that nearly all players
deal with, and the countless repetitions that are
needed to ingrain proper movement mechanics
of technical skills like pitching and batting, over-
use injuries are common among baseball play-
ers. Although much can be done to combat the
onset of these types of injuries, such as prehabili-
tation work for the rotator cuff and elbow as well
as scapular mobilization drills, to keep baseball
players healthy and properly rested from game
to game, the introduction of soft tissue work
from a trained professional is very important.
The physical capacities that should be trained
for baseball are outlined in this article. Improv-
ing anaerobic power and anaerobic capacity will
greatly improve sport performance. Baseball
players and coaches should stray away from the
traditional methods and adapt the methods out-
lined here to maximize their performance on the
field.
References1. Axe, M, Andrews, J, Zarins, B, and Wilk, K.
Overview of the principles of conditioning and
training: Injuries in baseball. New York, NY:
Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 527–531, 1998.
2. Burgomaster, K, Hughes, S, Heigenhauser,
G, Bradwell, S, and Gibala, M. Six sessions of
sprint interval training increases muscle oxidative
potential and cycle endurance capacity in
humans. Journal of Applied Physiology 98(6):
1985–1990, 2005.
3. Bulbulian, R, Chandler, J, and Amos, M. The
effect of endurance and sprint supplemental
training on aerobic and anaerobic measures of
fitness. Journal of Strength and Conditioning
Research 10(1): 51–55, 1996.
4. Coleman, E. Training the power pitcher.
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
31(2): 48–58, 2009.
5. Flesig, G, Dilman, C, and Escamilla, R.
Kinetics of baseball pitching with implications
about injury mechanisms. American Journal of
Sports Medicine 23(2): 233–239, 1995.
6. McEvoy, K, and Newton, R. Baseball throwing
speed and base running speed: The effects of
ballistic resistance training. Journal of Strength
and Conditioning Research 12(4): 216–221, 1998.
7. Rhea, M, Oliverson, J, Marshall, G, Peterson,
M, Kenn, J, and Ayllon, F. Noncompatibility of
power and endurance training among college
baseball players. Journal of Strength and
Conditioning Research 22(1): 230–234, 2008.
8. Tanisho, K, and Hirakawa, K. Training effects
on endurance capacity in maximal intermittent
exercise: Comparison between continuous
and interval training. Journal of Strength and
Conditioning Research 23(8): 2405–2410, 2009.
9. Wallace, B, Winchester, J, and McGuigan,
M. Effects of elastic bands on force and power
characteristics during the back squat exercise.
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
20(2): 268–272, 2006.
Methods for Training Baseball Players
about theAUTHOR
10nsca’s performance training journal • www.nsca.com • volume 11 issue 3
Debra Wein, MS, RD, LDN, CSSD, NSCA-CPT,*D and Courtney Hernandez, MS, RD, LDN
Debra Wein is a
recognized expert on
health and wellness and
has designed award
winning programs for
both individuals and
corporations around the
US. She is president
and founder of Wellness
Workdays, Inc., (www.
wellnessworkdays.com).
In addition, Wein is the
president and founder of
Sensible Nutrition, Inc.
(www.sensiblenutrition.
com), a consulting firm
of RD’s and personal
trainers, established
in 1994, that provides
nutrition and wellness
services to individuals.
Wein has nearly 20 years
of experience working in
the health and wellness
industry.
Courtney Hernandez has
been a Senior Nutritionist
with Wellness Workdays
for over five years. She
is a Registered Dietitian
(RD) with a Master’s
degree in Nutrition
Communication from the
Tufts University Friedman
School of Nutrition. She
is a Certified Wellness
Program Coordinator
(CWPC) after successfully
completing the National
Wellness Institute’s
certification program with
WebMD. She routinely
teaches behavior change
classes in areas of
weight management
and hypertension. She
also provides individual
nutrition counseling on
weight management,
sport nutrition,
cholesterol, and performs
body composition and
metabolism measures,
personal health
assessments, seminars,
lectures, and cooking
demonstrations.
Recommendations to take a daily multivitamin depend
on the health professional—some say yes, some say no.
Ideally, the best way to get your daily nutrients is from
the foods you eat. How do people eat a healthy diet that
includes plenty of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, good
sources of protein and healthy fats, every day? When it
comes to micronutrients, many Americans get less than
adequate amounts according to criteria set by the Insti-
tute of Medicine (2). Even athletes, who tend to pay closer
attention to consuming a healthy diet, may have a hard
time getting all of the nutrients they need from food (5).
Although there have been some conflicting studies about
the benefits of supplement use by Americans, many
health experts now recommend that most adults take a
daily multivitamin (1,2,7).
Athletes, in particular, may have an even greater need for
taking a multivitamin than an average adult. Many micro-
nutrients play key roles in energy metabolism and dur-
ing strenuous physical activity (4). Prolonged strenuous
exercise performed on a regular basis may also result in
increased losses of micronutrients from the body (4). Ad-
ditionally, vitamins and minerals are required in numer-
ous reactions involved with exercise and physical activity,
including energy, carbohydrate, fat and protein metabo-
lism, oxygen transfer and delivery, and tissue repair (6).
Athletes can increase their food intake to try to meet these
additional nutrient requirements, but many athletes may
not be willing to do this (especially those who train at a
certain weight or need to make weight requirements).
According to a study published by Louis and colleagues
there is evidence that taking a multivitamin can help with
recovery, especially after strenuous exercise (3).
Based on the study by Louis and colleagues, athletes
should consider taking a multivitamin. Taking a multivita-
min supplement should never be a substitute for proper
eating and you should think of it as nutritional insurance
and a “supplement” to your diet. Which multivitamin
should you take, though? Choosing a multivitamin can be
overwhelming since there are so many available choices.
The first thing to consider is which delivery form do you
prefer (e.g., tablet/capsule, liquid, chewable, powder).
Liquids are easily absorbed and are ideal for those who
cannot swallow pills. Capsules tend to be easier to absorb
and usually have fewer additives than tablets, but are gen-
erally more expensive than tablets. Chewables are ideal
for people who have a hard time swallowing large pills.
Before choosing a product, be sure to read the label care-
fully to see what the product contains. Look for products
that do not exceed 100% of the DRI (daily reference in-
take) of the major vitamins established by the Institute of
Medicine (2). Most multivitamins (but not all) also contain
minerals. Be sure to look for labels that say the product
meets the standards of the United States Pharmacopeia
(USP). This organization sets manufacturing standards for
medications and supplements sold in the United States
(7).
Some companies market their multivitamins as “food-
based” claiming that that the vitamins/minerals are com-
bined with powdered whole foods such as fruits and veg-
etables before they are encapsulated or tableted. There is
no scientific research to support the claims but purported
advantages are better absorption and less gastrointesti-
nal distress because the vitamins are taken with real foods.
These products are usually more expensive and not neces-
sarily worth the extra money. Take your multivitamin with
a meal and you will likely achieve the same benefit.
Athletes tend to have greater need for a daily multivitamin
but you should check with your local healthcare provider
for personal recommendations.
Multivitamins for Athletes
training table
11nsca’s performance training journal • www.nsca.com • volume 11 issue 3
References1. Fletcher, RH, and Fairfield, KM. Vitamins for
chronic disease prevention in adults: Clinical
applications. Journal of the American Medical
Association 287(23): 3127–3129, 2002.
2. Institute of Medicine. Dietary reference
intakes: Recommended daily allowances and
adequate intakes. Retrieved May 1, 2012,
from http://iom.edu/Activities/Nutrition/
SummaryDRIs/~/media/Files/Activity%20Files/
Nutrition/DRIs/RDA%20and%20AIs_Vitamin%20
and%20Elements.pdf. 2012.
3. Louis, J, Hausswirth, C, Bieuzen, F,
and Brisswalter, J. Vitamin and mineral
supplementation effect on muscular activity and
cycling efficiency in master athletes. Applied
Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 35(3):
251–260, 2010.
4. Maughan, RJ. Role of micronutrients in sport
and physical activity. British Medical Bulletin
55(3): 683–690, 1999.
5. Misner, B. Food alone may not provide
sufficient micronutrients for preventing
deficiency. Journal of the International Society of
Sports Nutrition 3: 51–55, 2006.
6. Volpe, SL. Micronutrient requirements for
athletes. Clinics in Sports Medicine 26(1):
119–130, 2007.
7. Willett, WC, and Skerrett, PJ. Eat, drink, and
be healthy. Free Press: New York, NY; 2001.
Multivitamins for Athletestraining table
feature
about theAUTHOR
12
summer games
nsca’s performance training journal • www.nsca.com • volume 11 issue 3
Fencing is usually considered an open-skilled
combat sport, but it is unique among combat
sports because it can be practiced at full speed
and contact with minimal risk of an acute injury. The es-
sential objective of fencing is to touch one’s opponent
with your fencing weapon before the opponent can do
the same, scoring points to win either a 5 or 15-point
fencing match, or bout. Bouts can range from 5 to more
than 45 min in overall length. The sport of fencing has
grown tremendously in the United States over the last
20 years, in a trend that has seen U.S. fencers win their
first Olympic gold medals in 100 years, in 2004. Despite
this growth, there is very little research on optimal
physical training programs for fencing athletes, as well
as very little research on patterns of injury and strate-
gies for injury prevention. The aim of this article is to
describe the kinematics of major fencing actions and,
based on the unique physical requirements of fencing,
discuss common exercises within a training program
appropriate for athletes engaged in the modern sport-
ing form.
Today, the sport has become a much more explosive en-
deavor, emphasizing pure speed of action more than its
ancestral forms. This places new demands on the mus-
culoskeletal system of athletes, which have major clini-
cal ramifications in terms of prevention and treatment
of acute injuries and chronic, repetitive stress disorders.
Fencing also relies heavily upon equipment, including
light, slender steel “weapons” of around 1 m in length
(usually with an orthopedic hand grip), a protective
uniform of heavy fabric, a metal-mesh facemask, and
oftentimes plastic chest protectors. The physical char-
acteristics of the weapons have obvious implications for
musculoskeletal performance, and the heat-insulating
properties of the uniforms also have major physiologi-
cal ramifications.
Motion AnalysisIt is commonly accepted that foil and epee fencing are
similar in regards to their movement patterns, with sa-
bre being markedly different. With this concept in mind,
motion analysis that utilizes high-speed cameras and
still photographs can be used to determine movement
patterns in the sport of fencing.
The foundational position for fencers is the guard po-
sition. In this position, the right-handed fencer stands
with the right side toward an opponent, with the right
foot forward and toes pointing directly at the oppo-
nent. Weight is distributed equally between the right
and left leg with a slight tendency for the athlete to be
shifted onto the toes/forefoot of the left foot, which
is at a right angle in comparison to the right foot. The
weight distribution varies depending on a fencer’s style,
position on the strip, and expected moves. The knees
are both flexed with the left leg more flexed. The trunk
is rotated to the left, decreasing the visible target area
available to the opponent. The left upper extremity is
either relaxed or held near the left side of the facemask.
The weapon arm is held near the body with the elbow
bent to approximately 90° and the wrist straight. Move-
ments forward and backward along the strip are called
advancing and retreating, which are essentially small
forward/backward steps carefully within this guard pos-
ture. Clearly, fencing athletes perform athletic actions
from a stance unique from any other sport. From this
stance, fencing athletes perform various “attacks.”
A fencing athlete initiates an attack with movement of
the weapon arm towards the opponent by extending
the elbow and rotating the trunk to the left. This basic
maneuver is termed a “thrust.” Typically, a thrust is com-
bined with lower extremity movements; most fencing
coaches utilize the motto, “the arm extends the weapon,
Sean M. Wells is an instructor in the Exercise Science and Athletic Training program at Florida Gulf Coast University. He obtained a Bachelor of Science in Athletic Training and a Doctorate in Physical Therapy from the University of North Florida. Wells has experience as a licensed orthopedic physical therapist and a licensed athletic trainer. His current areas of interest for research are total joint replacements, aging, and neurological conditions. He has published several studies on aging and assisted with studies in the areas of wound care and evidence-based practice. Wells owns and operates Naples Personal Training in Naples, FL, an institute that embraces merging evidence and experience with fitness and rehabilitation. He also serves as a consultant fitness expert for BistroMD, a physician-designed meal delivery program.
Russell Hogg is an Assistant Professor at Florida Gulf Coast University. Hogg earned his Bachelor’s from Baylor University, and both his Master’s of Philosophy and Doctorate in Biological Anthropology from the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, as part of the New York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology (NYCEP). Hogg currently teaches human anatomy and neuroanatomy to physical therapy, athletic training, and exercise science students.
Sean M. Wells, PhD, DPT, PT, ATC/L, CSCS, NSCA-CPT and Russell Hogg, PhD
Fencing: A Motion Analysis of Attacks and Common Exercises to Improve Speed
13nsca’s performance training journal • www.nsca.com • volume 11 issue 3
Fencing: A Motion Analysis of Attacks and Common Exercises to Improve Speed
the legs deliver the weapon to the opponent.”
Therefore, in order to contact the opponent, the
fencing athlete must either 1) be close enough
to an opponent to reach with only a thrust, 2)
must advance with a thrust, or 3) lunge with a
thrust. The thrust on its own is a relatively simple
action, with the advancing thrust slightly more
complex as the fencing athlete must simultane-
ously adjust his/her distance from the opponent.
The lunge is the most frequent attack and is chal-
lenging in that it involves marked power and
flexibility in the lower extremities especially, and
coordination between upper and lower body (1).
During high-speed motion analysis, the lunge
can be seen in two phases, the acceleration and
deceleration/contact phases. In the acceleration
phase, the lunge begins with an explosive thrust
towards the opponent. The fencing athlete takes
weight off the lead leg to begin extending the
knee and, consequently, dorsiflexing the ankle.
Concomitantly, the rear leg couples an explosive
knee extension and hip abduction to propel the
body forward towards the opponent. During this
maneuver, the trunk remains upright to ensure
the weapon can be delivered to the correct loca-
tion on the opponent. In the deceleration/con-
tact phase, the lead foot makes a heel-strike with
the tibialis anterior, quadriceps, hamstrings, and
hip extensors. The lead ankle moves into full dor-
siflexion at the end of the contact phase, with
the knee also moving into and beyond 90° of
flexion, depending on the reach needed to hit
the opponent. It is critical to prevent the knee
from flexing beyond the planted toes. At the end
of the deceleration phase, the lead hip is exter-
nally rotated and horizontally abducted to allow
the lead knee to remain pointing at the oppo-
nent. During the deceleration phase, the trailing
foot remains on the ground with the inside of
the foot often sliding or rolling on the ground.
Common ExercisesThree common training exercises utilized for
fencing athletes are lunges, chest presses, and
lateral raises. The lunge exercise is designed to
improve lower extremity strength and power,
which is vital for executing the thrust (1). Lunges
are performed from a standing position, with
a dumbbell in each hand. The athlete steps
forward with one leg, bending the trailing leg
so that it approaches the ground. The leading
leg remains bent in a right angle, ensuring the
knee does not move forward beyond the toes.
Pushing through the heel the athlete returns to
a standing position. This is then repeated with
the opposite leg as the lead leg. To improve
strength, a recommended weight should be se-
lected in order for the athlete to complete three
sets of 6 – 12 repetitions for each leg.
Another excellent exercise for fencing athletes
is the chest press. This exercise, commonly re-
ferred to as a bench press, promotes the utiliza-
tion of the pectoralis, deltoid, and triceps muscle
groups to promote speed with thrusting. This ex-
ercise is performed with the athlete on a bench
with the weight set to allow the athlete to com-
plete four sets of 3 – 6 repetitions at a high rate
of speed.
The last exercise commonly used to train fencing
athletes is the lateral shoulder raise. This exercise
promotes the endurance needed to maintain the
upper extremities in an upright, on-guard posi-
tion. Furthermore, this exercise promotes rotator
cuff strength, which may help prevent shoulder
injuries (2). The fencing athlete performs the ex-
ercise in a standing position with a dumbbell in
each hand (the weight should be light to start).
One repetition consists of the athlete raising
their arms from their side until their upper arms
are parallel to the floor and then lowering the
weight back to their side in a controlled motion.
Ideally, the weight should allow the athlete to
perform two sets of 20 – 25 repetitions.
The motion analysis above allows coaches to
better conceptualize the biomechanical de-
mands of the sport. The rationale for the com-
mon exercises used for this unique population is
also rooted in this analysis, with a heavy empha-
sis on speed. As the awareness of this Olympic
sport continues to grow, so will its body of re-
search and training principles.
References1. Gresham-Fiegel, C, House, P, and Zupan,
M. The effect of non-leading foot placement
on power and velocity in the fencing lunge.
Published ahead of print. Journal of Strength and
Conditioning Research, March 2012.
2. Niederbracht, Y, Shim, AL, Sloniger, MA,
Paternostro-Bayles, M, and Short, TH. Effects
of a shoulder injury prevention strength training
program on eccentric external rotator muscle
strength and glenohumeral joint imbalance
in female overhead activity athletes. Journal
of Strength and Conditioning Research 22(1):
140–145, 2008.