ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7 WG42 Upcoming NWIP for IS 42030

Architecture Evaluation

Invitation to IEEE for Early Informal Commentsat WICSA 2011 Workshop on Standards for

(software) Architecture

24 June 2011

Steven W. Mitchell, US TAGLockheed Martin Fellow

Agenda

• ISO/IEC 42030 – Architecture Evaluation

• Forward Plan

• Actors and Use Cases

• Consolidated Activities

• Preliminary Conceptual Architecture

• Conformance Concept

• IEEE Feedback

• Missed or Erroneous Use Cases

• Missing Architectural Concepts

• Other Comments and Suggestions

Plan for 42030 Architecture Evaluation

• Overview of IS 42030 NWIP Schedule

• Extended Process (4 years from NWIP to IS)

• July 2011 NWIP going out for ballot

• Nov 2011 prepare 42030 WD1

• May 2012 prepare 42030 WD2

• 42030 NWIP Ballot Will Be Accompanied by Annotated Outline including key diagrams

IS 42030 Outline Table of Contents

IS 42030 Users

42030 Use Case Model

IS 42030 Architecture Quality Use Cases

IS 42030 Architecture Description Quality

Use Cases

IS 42030 Concerns and Inference Use

Cases

IS 42030 Decision Use Cases

IS 42030 Process Use

Cases

Consolidated activities

Assess Architectur

e

Assess Implication

sof Findings

Review the

Findings

Frame the

Problem

Communicate

Results

Determine the

Analysis Technique

s and Tools

Assess Findings

Collect and Understand Required

Infotime

Manage AE (Plan,

Monitor,

Assess, Control, Learn)

Develop

Recommendations

Determine Evaluation

Critera

IS 42030 Architecture Description Evaluation

IS 42030 Architecture Evaluation

Conformance Concept

• The requirements in this International Standard are contained in Clauses 6, 7 and 8.

• An Architecture Evaluation conforms to this International Standard if it satisfies the requirements of Clauses 6 and 7.

• An Architecture Review Method conforms to this International Standard if it satisfies the requirements of Clause 7

• A Software Product delivering capabilities of Architecture Evaluation conforms to this International Standard if it satisfies the requirements of Clause 8.

IEEE Feedback• Missing or Erroneous Use Cases

• 1.

• 2.

• 3.

• 4.

• Missing Architectural Concepts

• 1.

• 2.

• 3.

• 4.

• Other Comments and Suggestions

• 1.

• 2.

• 3.

• 4.

Thank You For Your Comments and Suggestions!