ISO-TC135-SC5 N0220 New Standards on Digital Industrial Radiology

download ISO-TC135-SC5 N0220 New Standards on Digital Industrial Radiology

of 52

description

DIR StandardsISO-TC135-SC5_N0220_New_Standards_on_Digital_Industrial_RadiologyDigital Industrial Radiography Standard

Transcript of ISO-TC135-SC5 N0220 New Standards on Digital Industrial Radiology

  • The New Standards on Digital Industrial Radiology

    ISO 16371 to replace EN 14784ISO 16371 to replace EN 14784ISO 17636 to replace EN 1435

    byU. Ewert

    www.bam.de [email protected]

    BAM, Berlin, Germany,

    1ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    ISO/TC 135/SC 5 N 220

  • Available Standards on Digital Industrial RadiologyEN 13068 Radioscopy

    EN 14096, ISO 14096 Film Digitisation

    CR EN 14784 ISO 16371 P t 1 Cl ifi ti f S t P t 2 G lCR: EN 14784 ISO 16371 Part 1: Classification of Systems, Part 2: General principles

    ASTM: CR Classification (E 2446), Long-Term Stability (E 2445), Guide (E 2007), Practice (E 2033)

    ASME (BPVC, S.V, XI) CRformer Code Case 2476

    Radiography (CR) with Phosphor Imaging Platesformer Code Case 2476ASTM: DDA Manufacturing Characterization (E 2597), Practice

    (E 2698), Guide (E 2736), Performance Evaluation and Long Term Stability (E 2737)and Long-Term Stability (E 2737)

    ISO/DIS 10893-7 NDT of steel tubes: Digital RT of the welded seam

    EN 1435-2 ISO 17636-2 NDT of welds: Film Replacement (CR and DDA)35 SO 636 o e ds ep ace e t (C a d )ASTM E 2422 First digital catalogue, light alloy casting

    digitized films from ASTM E 155 (BAM)

    2ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • ISO 16371:Non-destructive testing Industrial computed radiography with storage phosphor imaging plates Part 1: Classification of systemsPart 2: General principles for testing of metallicPart 2: General principles for testing of metallicmaterials using X-rays and gamma rays

    New Title of ISO 17636:Non-destructive examination of welds - Digital radiographic examination of welded joints part 2: X- and gamma rays techniques with digital detectors

    3ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • - Proposal ISO 10893-7Standards to Consider

    - Non-destructive testing of steel tubes Part 7: Digital radiographic testing of the weld seam of welded steel tubes for the detection of imperfections

    - ASTM: CR - E 2445, E2446-2005: Classification, qualification, long term stability,

    harmonized with EN 14784-1 but revision requested- E 2033: Standard Practice for Computed Radiology under major revision- E 2033: Standard Practice for Computed Radiology under major revision

    - ASTM: DDA - E 2597-2007: Manufacturing Characterization, - E 2698-2010: Standard Practice- E 2736-2010: Guide - E 2737-2010: Performance Evaluation and Long-Term Stabilityg y

    - EN ISO 17635-2010 (substitutes EN 12062) NDT, General rules, weld inspection- Non-destructive examination of welds General rules for metallic materials

    R i i 14784 1 d 2 i d- Revision 14784-1 and -2 required - Non-destructive testing - Industrial computed radiography with storage

    phosphor imaging plates - Part 2 : general principles for testing of metallic t i l i X d

    4ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    materials using X-rays and gamma rays

  • Basic Requirements for Radiography

    B i t d d i t f fil d di it l di l i i

    g yin all National and International Standards

    Basic standard requirements for film and digital radiology in comparison:

    A hi i i ti l D it A hi i i SNRFilm Digital Detector (CR) Achieve minimum optical Density Achieve minimum SNRN Do not exceed maximum film system class or calibrated minimum pixel value

    D t d i h C t t d

    Do not exceed maximum unsharpness Correct geometry and

    detector selection Prove minimum IQI perception with

    Wires or Achieve minimum CNR Wires or, Achieve minimum CNRN Step holes or Use same IQIs to prove quality Plate holes Use optional unsharpness IQISNR Signal to noise ratioCNR C t t t i ti

    The following formulas and measurements will prove the

    5ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    CNR Contrast to noise ratiocorrectness of the requirements for digital detectors!

  • How to determine the Visibility of IQIs from CNR and SNR?- Now some figures and equations for those who are interested in the- Now some figures and equations for those who are interested in the

    physics of IQI vision

    Contrast and noise determine the visibility of indications

    I

    n

    t

    e

    n

    s

    i

    t

    y

    Contrast

    Signal(Base material)

    I

    n

    t

    e

    n

    s

    i

    t

    y

    Contrast

    Signal(Basematerial)

    Length

    (Base material)

    Length

    (Basematerial)

    N t h i ibl ! N t h t i ibl !Notch visible!

    Contrast/Noise is highSignal/Noise is high

    Notch not visible!

    Contrast/Noise is lowSignal/Noise is low

    6ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    Signal/Noise is high Signal/Noise is low

  • Image Quality Parameters in Digital Radiography

    IQI visibility (wires plate holes of given size)

    g y g g p y

    IQI-visibility (wires, plate holes of given size)Specific Contrast

    effISNRCNR Material, keVScatter protection{

    Contrast

    effITotalw Scatter protectionScreens and filters{

    Exposure timeExposure timeTube currentDetector efficiencyDetector efficiencySource Detector Distance

    Specific Contrast-to-Noise Ratio

    7ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    Contrast-to-Noise Ratio

  • Equivalence Value for Optical Density and Film System ClassThe measured SNRN is independent on unsharpness and is used as equivalent value for a required film system class and given optical density.Grey values cannot be used as equivalent values without qualification for the y q qused system and its settings because different digital systems (DDA or IP scanner) read out the detectors with different grey values in response to the same exposure dose and efficiency.y

    Influence of Noise in RadiographyFilm system C1 (Agfa D2) C4 (Agfa D5) C6 (Agfa D8)

    C t tNoise

    Contrast

    Indications vanish in the noise at higher film system classes

    8ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • Noise SourcesTypical noise sources in digital radiography:

    1 EXPOSURE CONDITIONS: Photon noise depending on1. EXPOSURE CONDITIONS: Photon noise, depending on exposure dose (e.g. mAs or GBqmin). This is the main factor! SNR increases with higher exposure dose.g p

    2. Limitation for the maximum achievable SNR:1 DETECTOR: Structural noise of DDAs and Imaging Plates1. DETECTOR: Structural noise of DDAs and Imaging Plates

    also called fixed pattern noise (due to variations in pixel to pixel response and inhomogeneities in the phosphor layer). p p g p p y )

    2. OBJECT:1 Crystalline structure of material (e g nickel based steel1. Crystalline structure of material (e.g. nickel based steel,

    mottling)

    2 Surface roughness of test object9ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    2. Surface roughness of test object

  • Verification of the Visibility Equations by Measurement and CalculationMeasurement and Calculation

    - The numeric calculation of the just visible IQI diameter depends on the qualification data SNR and Eff as well as on SNR (PV)the qualification data SNRmax and EffIP as well as on SNRmeasured(PV) and SRb_measured. For calculation of the just visible IQI diameter the visibility equation and the qualification equation are applied:

    Visibility equation II Qualification equation

    )(*

    PVSNRSRPTd

    eff

    bvisible 2max /)/( IPmeasuredmeasured

    measured

    EffPVSNRPVPVSNR

    4,719/2100)19( visiblevisible dmmdmmFeEPSEPS conversion

    PT* for wires is about 1,5 (depends on operator)eff for 200 kV and 19 mm Fe is about 0,05 mm-1SRb shall be used in mm

    10ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • Verification of the Visibility Equations by Measurement and Calculation

    Calculated visible wire diameters from pixel value, , SRb and SNRN

    - The numeric conversion of the qualification data SNRmax and EffIP as well as SNR (PV) and SR for calculation of the just

    0,400Justvisiblewirediameter

    largefocalspotcalcwirediameterFujiSTVI

    value, , SRb and SNRN

    well as SNRmeasured(PV) and SRb_measured for calculation of the just visible IQI diameter needs the combination of the visibility equation and the qualification equation after normalization with SR by:

    0,300

    0,350

    r

    VI

    largefocalspotcalcwirediameterFujiUR1

    largefocalspotcalcwirediameterDrrUR1

    largefocalspotcalcwirediameterDrrST

    Calculated and measured visible wire diameter in comparison

    SRb by:

    0,150

    0,200

    0,250

    v

    i

    s

    i

    b

    l

    e

    w

    i

    r

    e

    d

    i

    a

    m

    e

    t

    e

    r VI

    largefocalspotmeasuredwirediameterDrrSTVI

    largefocalspotmeasuredwirediameterDrrUR1

    large focal spot measured wire diameter

    W 12

    W 13

    W 14

    0,050

    0,100

    0, 50

    v

    largefocalspotmeasuredwirediameterFujiSTVI

    largefocalspotmeasuredwirediameterFujiUR1

    PT* for wires = 1,49 (depends on operator)

    0,000

    0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000GV

    The visibility equation (II) and the qualification equation were PT for wires 1,49 (depends on operator)eff for 200 kV and 19 mm Fe is 0,05 mm-1Measured with scanner DynamIx HR and Drr HD35 Imaging plates UR 1 and ST VI

    used to calculate the wire visibility. The solid lines in the graph are the result of calculation.The points in the diagram show the just visible wire diameters of EN 462-1 IQIs on a inch plate (19 mm) with 1,74 m SDD and

    11ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    Imaging plates UR 1 and ST VI EN 462 1 IQIs on a inch plate (19 mm) with 1,74 m SDD and 200 kV of a 320 kV X-ray tube of Seifert, Isovolt.

  • Cl ifi ti Q lifi ti L T St bilitClassification, Qualification, Long Term Stability

    12ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • Basic Requirements for Radiography Classification, Qualification, Long Term Stability TestsClassification, Qualification, Long Term Stability Tests

    - The Drr scanner provides linearAll CR systems are linear in the photo stimulated luminescence with radiation dose but may

    70000

    GVResponsetomAsIP 1 UR1IP 2 ST VI

    The Drr scanner provides linear pixel values with the exposure dose of the IPs.

    - The FujiFilm scanner provides

    yprovide non linear numeric data

    y=0,0001x2 +8,7975x 338,47

    y=8E05x2 +5,1652x+173,24

    y=0,0005x2 +48,745x 56,281

    50000

    60000

    70000 Scanner 1 DynamIx HRScanner 2 Drr HD35

    j pnonlinear values with the exposure dose of the IPs.

    - The data of the DynamIx HR y=6E06x2 +1,7255x 167,22

    30000

    40000

    50000

    G

    r

    e

    y

    V

    a

    l

    u

    e

    IP1scanner1IP2scanner1

    scanner were read as 12 bit raw data and linearized with a look up table (LUT) to linear 16 bit grey values:Th d t d t f th

    10000

    20000

    IP1scanner2IP2scanner2Poly.(IP1scanner1)Poly.(IP2scanner1)Poly.(IP1scanner2)Poly.(IP2scanner2)

    - The read out data of the scanner change depending of the used IP.

    - Minor offset and nonlinearity effects can be seen from the figure

    No saturation observed

    0

    0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000

    mAs

    can be seen from the figure.

    320 kV-X-ray tube,

    13ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    320 kV X ray tube, Seifert, Isovolt

  • Validation of Correlation of SNR and Grey values by Measurements and Calculations for

    Q lifi i f i i lQualification of imaging plate - scanner systems- The qualification is based on the correlation of SNR and Pixel Values

    of a CR system with fixed scanner settingsof a CR system with fixed scanner settings.- Scanner parameters as gain, scan speed, laser intensity, scan pixel

    resolution and others shall not be modified for qualification.

    y=4x0,5 y=1,2x0,5

    SNRMethod The IPs UR 1 and ST VI were

    exposed at different kVs and with different objects (Al and Fe plates) of different thickness (10 and 20SNR = 215

    Straight lines in the graph represent the grey efficiency as calculated from photon statistic without considering

    100,00

    10mmFeSTVI

    10mmALSTVI

    20mmAlUR1

    20mmALUR1

    20mmALUR1

    of different thickness (10 and 20 mm) and scanned with the DynamIx HR with standard settings.

    SNRmax =215STVI

    gSNRmax.

    S

    N

    R

    10mmFeUR1

    UR1medianSNRFe19mm200kV

    STVI200kV19mmFe

    SNRcalcSTVI

    SNRcalcUR1

    SNR photo calc ST VI

    All measured SNR values are always about the same for a corresponding pixel value.

    S f

    SNRmax =165UR1

    10,00

    10 100 1000 10000 100000

    Greyback

    SNRphotocalcSTVI

    SNRcalcphotoUR1

    Pot.(SNRphotocalcSTVI)

    Pot.(SNRcalcphotoUR1)

    measuredPVSNR

    measuredIPPhoto PVEffSNR All SNR vs. PV curves can be fitted

    with one SNRmax value and one grey efficiency EffIP value per IP.

    Q lifi ti ti

    14ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    y

    2max /)/( IPmeasuredmeasuredmeasured

    EffPVSNRPVPVSNR Qualification equation:ODD = 25 cm

  • SNRD vs. Normalized SNRN

    mSNRSNR 6,88b

    N SRSNRSNR

    SR 0 5 USRb = 0.5 Ui

    SNR Signal to noise ratio at detectorSNRN normalized SNR

    SNRN is the normalized detector SNR It is normalized to the standard pixel size of X-ray

    film in accordance to EN 584-1 (classification).SNRN normalized SNRSRb Basic spatial resolutionUi inherent detector unsharpness

    film in accordance to EN 584 1 (classification). The normalized SNRN considers the basic spatial

    resolution SRb (also called: effective detector pixel size) of the detector, measured with the duplex wire IQI (EN 462-5).

    The detector SNR of unsharp detectors is reduced to the value which is typically measured

    ith fil

    15ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    with films.

  • Measurement of Basic Spatial ResolutionDuplex wire IQIEN 462-5ISO 19232-5

    Determination of the basic spatial resolution in each

    ASTM E 2002

    spatial resolution in each production radiograph is not required.

    SNR controls sufficiently SNRN controls sufficiently the image quality at a given pixel size.

    SNR is a sufficient SNR is a sufficient parameter, if a maximum detector unsharpness is not exceedednot exceeded.

    The detector unsharpness shall be controlled by reference exposures withreference exposures with the duplex wire IQI.

    16ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • SNR method for determination of minimum PV

    - Make a reference exposureMake a reference exposure- Determine the GVmean and SNR as a graph

    - Do one exposure with a step wedge orDo one exposure with a step wedge or- Do different exposures of the IP without object but with

    prefilterp- Determine the duplex wire reading for determination of the

    basic spatial resolution SRbp b - Determine the SNRN values as function of grey value or

    dose and determine the maximum achievable SNRN max and N max classify

    - Determine for the specified SNRN the corresponding IP

    17ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010system class and add the basic spatial resolution

  • Proposed reference exposure with step wedgeAlternatively a step exposure can be taken under the same conditions as described in the standard.

    18ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • Calibration graph for SNR in dependence on PV

    The following graph should be generated:

    180

    The SNR number in the graph are examples.

    120

    140

    160 SNR=150

    g p pThe corresponding GVs can also be used in the standard practice

    60

    80

    100

    S

    N

    R

    SNR=70

    SNR=100standard practice

    The following table may be used to obtain

    0

    20

    40be used to obtain recommended minimum SNR values for IP-systems with different0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

    GreyvaluePixel valuesystems with different SRb in equivalence to film system classes.SRb = 88,6 m

    19ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • Proposedtable6intheoriginalproposalof2033,Annex5,fordefinitionofminimumSNRvalues

    Measurements have shown that higher SNRN values are required than for films. The new European values are 180, 120, 100, 70 (see revision of EN 14784-2 and ISO 17636 2)

    System parameter High definition system Standard system

    17636-2)

    Duplex wire value 13+ 13 12 11 10 9 8 7

    Detector-scanner unsharpness 80 m 100 m 125 m 160 m 200m 260 m 300 m 400 munsharpness

    Basic spatial CR system resolution 40 m 50 m 63 m 80 m 100m 130 m 160 m 200 m

    SNR levels Minimum SNR

    IP Special 70 85 110 135 170 220 270 340

    IP Level I 45 60 75 90 115 150 180 230

    SNRN150100IP Level I 45 75 90 150 230

    IP Level II 35 40 50 65 80 105 130 160

    IP Level III

    10070

    20ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • Verification from measured data for low SNR

    StepwedgeexposurewithTAMIQIsofE1742.

    i

    l

    t

    e

    r

    e

    d

    H

    i

    g

    h

    p

    a

    s

    s

    f

    i

    H

    CR of a step wedge with IQIs Taken at 80 kV and 10 mAmin, 1 m.At SNR = 36 the 2-2T is clearly visible.

    21ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • Classification in EN 14784-1 (also ASTM E 2446) by SNRN and Basic spatial resolution SRb

    Where do the SNR values come from for CR ?- Equivalence to film systems was used as defined in ISO 11699-1 for the film

    t lsystem classes.- Films systems have the following minimum SNR values at 88.6 m square

    aperture and optical density of 2 above fog and base (see table below)

    Minimum gradient-noise Signal to Noise Ratio for

    Table for film system classification of international standards:

    Minimum gradient noise ratio for film at

    Signal to Noise Ratio for film and CR

    D=2 above D0 D=2 above D0ISO 11699-1 CEN 584-1

    USA ASTM

    E181 01 GD SNRC1 Special 300 130C2 270 117C3 180 78

    CEN 584 1 E1815-01

    IC4 150 65C5 II 120 52C6 III 100 43

    W-A 135W-B 110

    22ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    W-B 110W-C 80

  • Classification in EN 14784-1 (also ASTM E 2446) by SNRN and Basic spatial resolution SRb

    Where do the SNR values come from for CR ?- Minimum normalized SNRN and SRb requirements for CR classification

    Y basic spatial resolution SR in mmresolution SRb in mm

    In the mean time allIn the mean time all commercial NDT CR systems fulfill all IP classes withclasses with different SRb

    23ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • Annex for Classification in EN 14784-1 (also ASTM E 2446) by SNRN and Basic spatial resolution SRb

    SNRN SNRN_max should be added for a next revision after finalization of

    IP 1

    development of ISO 17636.

    Efficiency is correctlyIP 1IP 2IP 3IP 4

    Exposure Geometry for t f SNR G

    Efficiency is correctly considered for measurement of ISO speed

    IP 4IP 5IP 6

    measurement of SNRN vs. Grey values or exposure dose

    Log (mAs or GV)Annex A of EN 14784-1Annex A of EN 14784 1

    24ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • High Definition CR SYSTEMD HD CR 3 NDT & HD IP

    Detailed BAM qualification reports are available for Carestream, Duerr, FujiFilm and GE S&IT

    Drr HD-CR 35 NDT & HD-IP pentaprism speed: 2000 RPM PMT Voltage: 620 HV operating pixel size: 20 moperating pixel size: 20 m

    IP Scanner SystemHi h D fi iti I i Pl t

    25ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    IP Scanner SystemHigh Definition Imaging Plates

  • Result of Classifications of Different Computed Radiography Systems

    350

    400

    250

    300

    e

    d

    200

    250

    R

    n

    o

    r

    m

    a

    l

    i

    z

    e

    100

    150

    S

    N

    R

    D2, DR, IX25

    D3, M100D4, MX125

    FujiFilm CR XG1, ST VI

    0

    50 D7, AA400D5, T200

    D8, H800

    00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    SQRT (Dose / mGy)

    Normalized SNR vs square root of Exposure Dose

    26ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    Normalized SNR vs. square root of Exposure Dose

  • Measurement of long term stability for quality assurance in EN 14784-1 (also ASTM E 2445)

    Test phantom with a variety of IQIs and test yobjects

    The test phantom or its IQIs shall be exposed and the results shall be documented periodicallydocumented periodically.

    Deviations in the measured values will indicate changes , aging or malfunction.

    The frequency of the testThe frequency of the test shall be part of the quality assurance system of the manufacturer.

    27ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • Documentation of long term stability for quality assurance in EN 14784-1 (also ASTM E 2445)

    The results of the tests can be documented as demonstrated by the following template

    28ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • New Features for Standard Practice in ISO 16371-2 and ISO 17636-2

    CR and DR with DDA is proposed in one standard document for ISO 17636-2. SNRN or grey value as equivalent value for film system class and opt. density

    and ISO 17636 2

    N g y q y p y No mandatory requirement of SNRN and duplex wire for production radiographs Usage of duplex wire for system qualification and system selection only Mandatory usage of duplex wire for magnification technique onlyMandatory usage of duplex wire for magnification technique only Usage of flat cassettes and DDAs for curved objects with new formula for

    calculation of SDD New revised unsharpness tables New revised unsharpness tables 3 compensation principles (3rd one for DDAs only) No lead back screens but back scatter protection

    L d f t l b 250 kV d t f CR t b l 250kV Lead front screens only above 250 kV mandatory for CR, not below 250kV (values can be discussed)

    New part on DDAs with calibration and bad pixel discussion in ISO 17636-2 Annex C for conversion of SNR and SNRN requirements to gray values (for CR)

    as equivalent for opt. density. No use of EPS plates as in ASTM E 2033-2010 proposal.

    29ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • New Requirement for Minimum SNRNRadiation source Penetrated wall Minimum SNR_D Type and thickness in mm of metal

    Class A

    Class B

    X-ray < 50 kV 100 180

    thickness w in mm

    yscreen

    IP classes are not mentioned X-ray 50 kV to 150 kV 70 120

    X-ray > 150 kV to 250 kV 70 100

    w < 50 70 100 X-ray > 250 kV to 350 kV

    in the standard proposal anymore

    New SNR values wereX ray > 250 kV to 350 kV w > 50 70 70 w < 50 70 100

    X-ray > 350 kV to 450 kV w > 50 70 70

    5 70 120

    New SNRN values were taken due to experiences over years with DDAs and CR

    w < 5 70 120Yb 169

    w > 5 70 100

    w < 50 70 100 Ir 192, Se 75

    w > 50 70 70w > 50 70 70

    w < 100 70 100 Co 60b

    w > 100 70 70

    w < 100 70 100X 1 MVbX-ray > 1 MVb

    w > 100 70 70

    a

    30ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • Selection of Radiation Quality vs. Exposure Dose

    Compensation Principle (I)

    31ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • Compensation Principle (I)Visibility of IQIs in dependence on exposure dose andexposure dose and tube voltage for steel

    - Increasing tube voltage reduces the specific contrast b tcontrast eff but increases the exposure dose on the detector

    - The increase of SNR by the improved quantum statisticquantum statistic compensates the loss of contrast

    SNRCNR IQI-perception (wires, plate holes)

    32ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    effITotalSNR

    w

  • Compensation Principle (I)

    The diagram limiting the maximum tube voltage is not mandatory anymoreanymore

    The used tube voltage should be higher for application of DDAsg pp

    The tube voltage should be lower (about 20%) for application of i i l t ( di dimaging plates (medium and coarse grained) for class B inspection in comparison to film

    Compensation principle (I):

    A reduction of contrast by increased tube voltage can be compensated by increasedA reduction of contrast by increased tube voltage can be compensated by increased detector SNR. Reduced detector SNR shall be compensated by contrast increase (e.g. by reduced tube voltage).

    33ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • BAM 5, 8mm steel

    Maximum Achieved Contrast EnhancementFuji IX25SNRnorm~ 265

    DDA Technology provides betterprovides better image quality than film with a

    Best (slowest) NDT filmt a

    special calibration procedure!

    Images high pass filtered for better presentation

    PerkinElmer 1620

    presentation

    34ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010SNRnorm~ 1500

    DDA exposure

  • Testing with flat Detectors and flat Cassettes is required for ff ti t ti ith DDA d I i Pl teffective testing with DDAs and Imaging Plates

    DDA flat and

    Film and CR in contactb

    Cassettest

    3/1tba

    df Class A: a = 7,5Class B: a = 15

    f source object distance (SOD)d focal spot sozet wall thickness (nominal)

    35ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    tdt wall thickness (nominal)

  • The correct selection of magnification shall be proven by usage of the duplex wire IQI on the object

    Magnification TechniqueThe correct selection of magnification shall be proven by usage of the duplex wire IQI on the objectin all production radiographs. The duplex wire IQI shall be positioned at the object side near to the detector, if 2SRb > d (d - source size or focal spot size). Otherwise the duplex wire shall be positioned at the sorce side of the object. It is recommended that a duplex wire is positioned at both object sides for selection of the mangnification value but only one needs to be seen in theboth object sides for selection of the mangnification value, but only one needs to be seen in the final production radiographs after selection of the correct magnification factor and source size or focal spot size. The suitable magnification v can be estimated by the following equation:The suitable magnification v can be estimated by the following equation:

    333

    Im

    )2()(1 bG SRuU

    Im

    (5) with

    )1( SODSSDduG SOD

    (6) SRb basic spatial resolution of the detector SDD source detector distanceSDD source detector distanceSOD source object distance uG geometrical unsharpness d focal spot size or source size in accordance with EN 12544 or EN 12579 UI required image unsharpness in accordance with table B13 or B14 for class A or B testing

    36ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    UIm required image unsharpness in accordance with table B13 or B14 for class A or B testing

  • Magnification Technique The magnification factor is typically different for source and detector side of the object. Therefore, the magnification v should be calculated for the object center. The variation of the magnification

    l t id d d t t id h ld t b hi h th 25% S ll ifi ti

    g q

    value at source side and detector side should not be higher than 25%. Smaller magnification values may be choosen if compensation principle (II) as described in 6.3.3 is used.

    L tiFDD LocationFOD

    FDD

    Collimator

    Real focal spot

    Object

    IntensityDetector

    37ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • Partial presentation of ptable 1, class A ofISO DIS 10893-7

    Minimum requirements for IQI visibility

    SO SIn ISO DIS 10893-7 is the usage of the duplex wire IQI mandatory.

    In prEN 1435-2 the usage of the duplex wire shall be mandatory onlyshall be mandatory only for system selection, system qualification and magnification techniquemagnification technique.

    38ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • Compensation Principle (II)

    Compensation of high detector unsharpness by increased SNR

    Unsharp digital systems may be applied for NDT if they enable to compensate the missing sharpness by increased SNR.

    That means achieves a digital system not the required visibility of theThat means, achieves a digital system not the required visibility of the separated duplex wires, it can be used for NDT, if one or two single wires more than required (see tables B.1 B.12) can be seen clearly in the digital image for one or two missing duplex wire pairsin the digital image for one or two missing duplex wire pairs.

    For instance, is a digital detection system used, which achieves the duplex wire pair D11 (first unsharp wire pair) for inspection of a 5 mm thick object and class B testing (required is D12 and W16), single wire W17 shall be clearly visible in the image for acceptable quality.

    Compensation principle (II):Compensation principle (II): High detector unsharpness can be compensated by increased SNR

    39ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • Compensation Principle (II) Test sample BAM 58 mm steelDetection of fine flaws with subpixel resolution

    highpass highpass filtered

    13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Draht O3 5 6 8 9

    13 14 15 16 17 18 19C1 film:wire ~16 visible

    DDA ( ifi ti 1)

    Draht O EN 462-1

    W13 200mW14 160m

    200m pixel size!

    100m contrast resolution DDA (magnification = 1):W19 = 50m contrast resolution

    W15 130mW16 100mW17 80mW18 63mclass B

    40ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    200m pixel size!W18 63mW19 50m

    class B

  • Compensation Principle (III)Management of Bad Pixels

    The appearance of certain detector elements, which do not perform as required has initiated a controversial discussion about the acceptance of DDAs for NDT. p

    ASTM E 2597 describes the different types and groups of bad pixels and provides a recommendation for interpolation.

    The interpolation causes local unsharp regions in the digital image. The detection of small flaws can be achieved if the SNR is increased.

    Compensation principle (III) :

    Local unsharpness due to bad pixel interpolation can be compensated by increases SNR.

    41ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • Bad pixel Types and ClassificationsDead Pixel Pixels that have no response, or that give a constant response independent ofradiation dose on the detector.Over responding pixel Pixels whose gray values are greater than 1.3 times the mediangray value of an area of a minimum of 2121 pixels This test is done on an offset correctedgray value of an area of a minimum of 2121 pixels. This test is done on an offset correctedimage.Under responding pixel Pixels whose gray values are less than 0.6 times the median grayvalue of an area of in a minimum of 2121 pixels. This test is done on an offset correctediimage.Noisy pixel Pixels whose standard deviation in a sequence of 30 to 100 images withoutradiation is more than 6 times the median pixel standard deviation for the complete DDA.Non-uniform pixel Pixel whose value exceeds a deviation of more than +/-1 % of themedian value of its 99 neighbor pixel. The test should be performed on an image where theaverage gray value is at or above 75% of the DDAs linear range. This test is done on anoffset and gain corrected image.Persistence / Lag pixel Pixel whose value exceeds a deviation of more than a factor of 2Persistence / Lag pixel Pixel whose value exceeds a deviation of more than a factor of 2of the median value of its 99 neighbors in the first image after X-ray shut downBad neighborhood pixel Pixel, where all 8 neighboring pixels are bad pixels, is alsoconsidered a bad pixel.

    Single bad pixel Cluster bad pixelsLine of bad pixels

    CKP

    Cluster kernel pixel (CKP) are pixels which only

    42ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    Line of bad pixelsCluster kernel pixel (CKP) are pixels, which only have four or less good neighborhood pixels

  • Measurement of Bad PixelBad Pixel EvaluationASTM E2597 Manufacturers measure bad pixels and their natureASTM - E2597 Manufacturers measure bad pixels and their nature

    Some classifications of Bad Pixels ...

    single dead line (without signal)

    cluster (2x3 pixel)

    single non uniform line (signal level varies differently to dose thansignal level of the other lines)

    single dead pixel (without signal)

    single noisy pixel (> 6 sigma in dark image)

    single non uniform pixel(signal level varies differently with dose thansignal level of the neighboring pixels)

    detail from the complete image

    signal level of the neighboring pixels)

    single lag pixel(pixel with factor 3 higher lag compared

    di l f h l 9 % )

    43ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    to median lag of the central 95% area)

  • Bad Pixels, Relevant and Irrelevant Clusters, and Bad Lines

    44ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • Bad Pixel Correction

    How Bad Pixels are corrected:

    Bad Pixels do not avoid the detection of flaws, if the SNR is high enough

    Grid of the detector

    The defect pixel is substituted by theThe defect pixel is substituted by the 8 neighborhood pixels

    one pixel

    45ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    one pixel

  • Worst case scenario - Interpolation

    Bad pixels do not look like defects-Defects have some blur, bad pixels are discrete

    A Defect in Material, size of 1.5 pixel

    Example:An area of material with grayvalue 10000.Th d f t h 2% l d it th thThe defect has 2% less density than the rest.The defect covers ~ of the pixel (100).

    1010010038

    The substituted Pixel will be:(3*10100 + 5*10000) / 8 = 10038 == 0.38%and well visible with SNR>265.

    Pixel Grid of the Detector

    10000

    Bad Pixel

    46ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    Pixel Grid of the Detector

  • Guidance for bad pixel specifications based on CNR and defect size

    Bad pixel considerations

    Bad pixel considerationsLimited number of bad pixels allowed in area of interest

    Detectability: positive (best practice)

    area of interest

    isolated bad pixels allowed, but no clusters allowed

    isolated bad pixels and irrelevant clusters allowed but

    clusters allowed

    clusters allowed but relevant clusters not allowed.

    impact of different

    Defect size (as number of pixels)

    impact of different types of bad pixels on detectability is minimal

    47ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    Defect size (as number of pixels)

  • 6.9.2 Calibration of DDAs

    If using DDAs the detector calibration procedure as recommended by th f t h ll b li dthe manufacturer shall be applied.

    The detector shall be calibrated with a background image (without radiation) and at least with one gain image (X-Rays on and ) g g ( yhomogenously exposed).

    Multigain calibration will increase the achievable SNR and linearity but takes more time All calibration images shall be taken at least with 2takes more time. All calibration images shall be taken at least with 2 times longer exposure dose (mAmin or GBq min) as finally used for the production radiographs to minimise the noise introduction of the

    lib ti dcalibration procedure. Calibrated images may be treated as unprocessed raw images for

    quality assurance if the procedure has been documented. qua ty assu a ce t e p ocedu e as bee docu e ted The calibration and a bad pixel interpolation shall be performed

    periodically and if the exposure conditions are changes significantly.

    48ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • B d i l d f i d t t l t f DDA Th d fi d d

    6.9.3 Bad pixel interpolation

    Bad pixels are underperforming detector elements of DDAs. They are defined and described in ASTM 2597.

    If using DDAs the detector shall be mapped to determine the bad pixel map in d ith th f t id li Thi b d i l h ll b d t daccordance with the manufacturer guideline. This bad pixel map shall be documented.

    The bad pixel interpolation is acceptable and an essential procedure of radiography with DDAs. It is recommended to apply only detectors which have no cluster kernel pixels (CKP, definition see in ASTM E 2597) in the region of interest (ROI). All cluster kenel(CKP, definition see in ASTM E 2597) in the region of interest (ROI). All cluster kenel pixels shall be documented.

    DDAs without CKPs and CR shall be applied for inspection of flaws which are larger than 3x3 pixels for spot like indications and larger than 2x6 pixels for linear indications in the3x3 pixels for spot like indications and larger than 2x6 pixels for linear indications in the digital image.

    If using DDAs or Imaging plates for inspection of smaller flaw sizes, the required SNR shall be increased significantly. The inspection shall be performed on the basis of anshall be increased significantly. The inspection shall be performed on the basis of an agreement between the contracting parties. The image quality shall be proven as described above.

    Note 3: ote 3

    In analogy to the compensation principle (II) the increased SNR compensates also for the local unsharpness caused by bad pixel interpolation. This is considered as compensation principle (III).

    49ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    p p p ( )

  • Minimum Requirement for SNR and Lead Screen ThicknessRadiation source Penetrated wall Minimum SNR_D Type and thickness in mm of metal

    Class A

    Class B Front Back

    X-ray < 50 kV 100 180 None None

    thickness w in mm

    yscreen

    X-ray 50 kV to 150 kV 70 120 Pb 0 - 0,1 Fe 0,5+ Pb

    X-ray > 150 kV to 250 kV 70 100 Pb 0 - 0,1 Fe 0,5+ Pb

    w < 50 70 100 Pb 0 - 0,2 Fe 0,5+ PbX-ray > 250 kV to 350 kVX ray > 250 kV to 350 kV

    w > 50 70 70 Pb 0,1 - 0 ,3 Fe 0,5+ Pb

    w < 50 70 100 Pb 0,1 - 0 ,3 Fe 0,5+ PbX-ray > 350 kV to 450 kV

    w > 50 70 70 Pb 0,1 - 0 ,3 Fe 0,5+ Pb

    5 70 120 Pb 0 0 1 F 0 5 Pbw < 5 70 120 Pb 0 - 0,1 Fe 0,5+ PbYb 169

    w > 5 70 100 Pb 0 - 0,1 Fe 0,5+ Pb

    w < 50 70 100 Pb 0,1 - 0 ,3 Fe 0,5+ PbIr 192, Se 75

    w > 50 70 70 Pb 0 1 - 0 4 Fe 0 5+ Pbw > 50 70 70 Pb 0,1 - 0,4 Fe 0,5+ Pb

    w < 100 70 100 Fe 0,5+Pb 1,5 Fe 0,5+PbCo 60b

    w > 100 70 70 Fe 0,5+Pb 2,0 Fe 0,5+Pb

    w < 100 70 100 Fe 0,5+Pb 1,5 Fe 0,5+PbX 1 MVbX-ray > 1 MVb

    w > 100 70 70 Fe 0,5+Pb 2,0 Fe 0,5+Pb

    a.

    b In case of multiple screens (Fe+Pb) the steel screen shall be located between the IP and the lead screen. InsteaFe or Fe+Pb also copper tantalum or tungsten screens may be used if the image quality can be proven

    50ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    Fe or Fe+Pb also copper, tantalum or tungsten screens may be used if the image quality can be proven.

  • Edge Profiles220 kV, no Pb back screen

    Effect of Scatter UnsharpnessEffect of Scatter UnsharpnessScatter Effects at

    sharp edges:

    - Internal scatter in the

    220 kV 4 mm Pb back screen

    layer

    - Internal scatter of the back screen support Long range 220 kV, 4 mm Pb back screenback screen, support and cassette

    - Object scatter

    unsharpness effect from lead back screen, cassette and support

    51ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

  • ENDEND

    www.bam.de [email protected]

    52ISO 16371, ISO 17636 Ewert, June 2010

    13162410_1.pdf13162410_1_p1.pdf13162410_1.pdf13162410_1.pdf

    13162410_1_p2-.pdf13162410_1.pdf