ISO 19160, Addressing - Global Address Data Association · ISO 19160, Addressing presented...

UPUUPU Addressing Conference including Addressing Conference including S42S42 Recognition CeremonyRecognition CeremonyBerne, Switzerland, 9 November 2010Berne, Switzerland, 9 November 2010

ISO 19160, ISO 19160, AddressingAddressing

presented presented byby

Antony Cooper Antony Cooper [email protected]@csir.co.za

The Addressing project by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) by Serena Coetzee [email protected] Addressing the Future, First European Address Conference, 15 June 2010, Brussels, Belgium

Antony Cooper Antony Cooper [email protected]@csir.co.za

ConvenorConvenor: Working Group 7, : Working Group 7, Information CommunitiesInformation Communities, ISO/, ISO/TCTC 211211Built Environment Unit, CSIR, Pretoria, South AfricaBuilt Environment Unit, CSIR, Pretoria, South Africa

Serena Serena Coetzee Coetzee [email protected]@cs.up.ac.za

Project leader: ISO 19160, Project leader: ISO 19160, AddressingAddressingDepartment of Computer Science, University of Pretoria, South Department of Computer Science, University of Pretoria, South AfricaAfrica

OverviewOverview

• International Organization for

Standardization (ISO)Standardization (ISO)

• ISO 19160, Addressing

• Role players and current status

ISO 19160, Addressing

© Antony Cooper and Serena Coetzee, ISO/TC 211, Geographic information/Geomatics

UPU Addressing Conference including S42 Recognition Ceremony, Berne, Switzerland, 9 November 2010

22

ISOISO

• International organization for standardization

– ISO from isos (Greek) meaning ‘equal’

– Standards are developed by consensus

– 162 countries

– World's largest developer and publisher of international standards

– Examples

• ISO 9000 series on Quality management systems




• ISO 9000 series on Quality management systems

• ISO 14000 series on Environmental management

www.iso.org

3

ISO/TC 211ISO/TC 211

ISO/TC 211, Geographic information/Geomatics

Standardization in the field of digital geographic information.Standardization in the field of digital geographic information.

This work aims to establish a structured set of standards for information concerning

objects or phenomena that are directly or indirectly associated with a location

relative to the Earth.

These standards may specify, for geographic information, methods, tools and services

for data management (including definition and description), acquiring, processing,

analyzing, accessing, presenting and transferring such data in digital/electronic form

between different users, systems and locations.




between different users, systems and locations.

The work shall link to appropriate standards for information technology and data

where possible, and provide a framework for the development of sector-specific

applications using geographic data.

www.isotc211.org

4


ISO/TC 211 Participating members (32)

Australia (SA) Finland (SFS) Morocco (SNIMA) Republic of Serbia

(ISS)(ISS)

Austria (ON) France (AFNOR) Netherlands (NEN) South Africa (SABS)

Belgium (NBN) Germany (DIN) New Zealand (SNZ) Spain (AENOR)

Canada (SCC) Hungary (MSZT) Norway (SN) Sweden (SIS)

People's Republic

of China (SAC)

Italy (UNI) -

(UNINFO)

Peru (INDECOPI) Switzerland (SNV)

Czech Republic Japan (JISC) Portugal (IPQ) Thailand (TISI




5

Czech Republic

(UNMZ)

Japan (JISC) Portugal (IPQ) Thailand (TISI

Denmark (DS) Republic of Korea

(KATS)

Russian Federation

(GOST R)

United Kingdom

(BSI)

Ecuador (INEN) Malaysia (DSM Saudi Arabia (SASO) USA (ANSI)


ISO/TC 211 Observing members (31)

Argentina (IRAM) Hong Kong

(ITCHKSAR)

Kenya (KEBS) Slovenia (SIST)

(ITCHKSAR)

Bahrain (BSMD) Iceland (IST) Mauritius (MSB) Swaziland

Brunei Darussalam

(CPRU)

India (BIS) Oman (DGSM) United Republic of

Tanzania (TBS)

Colombia (ICONTEC) Indonesia (BSN) Pakistan (PSQCA) Turkey (TSE)

Croatia (HZN) Islamic Republic of

Iran (ISIRI)

Philippines (BPS) Ukraine (DSSU)




6

Cuba (NC) Ireland (NSAI) Poland (PKN) Uruguay (UNIT)

Estonia (EVS) Israel (SII) Romania (ASRO) Zimbabwe (SAZ)

Greece (ELOT) Jamaica (BSJ) Slovakia (SUTN)


ISO/TC 211 External liaison organizations (29)

European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC)

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO/UN)Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO/UN)

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN ECE) Statistical Division

United Nations Geographic Information Working Group (UNGIWG)

Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS)

Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. (OGC)

United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names (UNGEGN)

Universal Postal Union




7

Universal Postal Union

etc.

ISO/TC 211ISO/TC 211ISO/TC 211 Internal liaison committees (15)

ISO/TC 154, Processes, data elements and documents in commerce, industry and

administration

ISO/TC 171, Document management application

ISO/TC 184/SC4, Industrial Data

ISO/TC 204, Intelligent transport systems

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32, Data Management and Interchange

etc.

Other ISO/TC 211 liaison organizations (5)




8

Other ISO/TC 211 liaison organizations (5)

CEN/TC 287, Geographic Information

CEN/TC 278, Road Transport and Traffic Telematics

CEN/ISSS, Workshop on Metadata for Multimedia Information – Dublin Core

etc.

BackgroundBackground

ISO Workshop on address standards Considering the issues related to an international

address standardConsidering the issues related to an international

address standard

25 May 2008

National Survey and Cadastre, Copenhagen, Denmark

WG 7 of ISO/TC 211, Geographic information/Geomatics

11 presentations from different countries, organizations:

Association for Geographic Information (AGI), Australia,




9

Association for Geographic Information (AGI), Australia, Denmark, INSPIRE, ISO/TC 211, Japan, South Africa, Universal

Postal Union (UPU), United States

Proceedings of the workshop www.isotc211.org/address/address


Preliminary work (stage 0) on addressing

Objectives:

1. Investigate and formulate requirements in

relation to addressing.

2. Make recommendations on whether

standards should be developed and if so,




10

standards should be developed and if so,

how this should be done.


• NOT to write an address standard!

• Get stakeholders around table• Get stakeholders around table

• Review existing standards

1. Concepts and terminology

2. Address encoding, rendering and aliases

3. Address data quality

4. Address assignment schemes




11

4. Address assignment schemes

Addressing standardization requirements?

Diversity of address typesDiversity of address types




1212

Diversity of address usesDiversity of address usesCensus

MailForms

Deliveries




1313

Bank accountEmergency response

Municipal services

Utilities

Finding friends

etc.

Benefits of standardizationBenefits of standardization

EconomyEconomy

SocietySociety




1414

GovernanceGovernance

TodayToday

• Same fields for all countries

• No space for building names, e.g. South Africa?South Africa?

• How to enter addresses based on blocks and boundaries, e.g.

Japan?

• No address verification




15

An international standard…An international standard…� Depending on the country, the

text boxes change

� More than one address type � More than one address type per country

� Real-time address verification before check-out




16


Address standard role players

ISO/TC 211, Geographic information/ ISO/TC 154, Processes, data elements and

No ‘Geographic information - ’

Geomatics documents in commerce, industry and

administration (also UN/CEFACT)

Universal Postal Union (UPU) Organization for the Advancement of

Structured Information Standards (OASIS)

UN Group of Experts on Geographical

Names (GEGN)

MoU Management Group (MoU/MG): ISO,

IEC, ITU, UN/EC Europe

UN Economic Commission for Africa

(ECA)

UPU-ISO contact committee




1717

(ECA)

INSPIRE (EURADIN) Emergency response organizations

Developed countries Developing countries

World Bank World Health Organization (WHO)

Address standardsAddress standards

International Regional

National




1818

etc.

How standards facilitate address interoperabilityHow standards facilitate address interoperability

• Addressing system– How addresses are allocated in the real world

• Terminology• Terminology– Terms and definitions describing the addressing

system and/or concepts

• Conceptual model that describes addresses– Meaning of concepts and relationships between

them• Typically, a combination of components or elements




• Typically, a combination of components or elements

• Often comprising a hierarchy

– Address classifications (address types)

19

How standards facilitate address interoperabilityHow standards facilitate address interoperability

• Address-specific metadata

– Custodian, lifespan, status, etc

– For use, exchange and maintenance of address data– For use, exchange and maintenance of address data

• Encoding of the conceptual data model

– Format for data files or electronic messages

• Address data maintenance

– Address data quality management, address life




– Address data quality management, address life cycles, address aliases, etc

• Specifications for the rendering of addresses

– For display on mail items, forms, maps, etc

20

ISO 19160ISO 19160, Addressing, Addressing

• Methodology

– Review address standards– Review address standards

• Review address standards

• Assess international standardization requirements

• Propose international standardization requirements




21

1. ISO Standard: Addressing reference model– Terms and definitions

– Conceptual model (UML)• Ensure mapping from one implementation to another is possible

ISO 19160 RecommendationsISO 19160 Recommendations

ISO

• Ensure mapping from one implementation to another is possible

– Creation and maintenance of address datasets

2. Implementations of the addressing reference model– May include

• Addressing schema based on the reference model

• How to create and maintain a dataset based on this schema

– Examples• Country-specific (e.g. SANS 1883)

• Region-specific (e.g. INSPIRE)

• Postal (e.g. UPU)

• For electronic business (e.g. OASIS)

Not ISO




• Region-specific (e.g. INSPIRE)

– An instance of the implementation is• An address (reference) dataset

• A specific address data record

3. Encodings of implementations

• For electronic business (e.g. OASIS)

4. Address data quality– How to measure and ensure address data quality

5. Addressing good practices

ISO 19160 RecommendationsISO 19160 Recommendations

5. Addressing good practices– For addressing schemes/systems

– How to assign address numbers

– Street name and place name signs

6. Language to describe address rendering– Mail pieces, forms, labels on maps, etc.




– Mail pieces, forms, labels on maps, etc.

7. Language to describe address grammar ???– For parsing: geocoding, validation

ISO 19160, AddressingISO 19160, Addressing

• Draft review summary (report)

– Finalize draft in Australia, December 2010– Finalize draft in Australia, December 2010

– Distribute for comments

– Review/address comments in Netherlands, May 2011

• Conclude project in 2011




THEN: new work item proposals…

AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements

• Universal Postal Union– Invitation to make this presentation

– Funding support– Funding support

• The CSIR (my employer)– Funding support

– Permission to travel

• Serena Coetzee




– Most of the presentation material

• Werner and Susanne Wolfer– Providing accommodation in Berne

25

Thank youThank you

Questions?




26

ISO 19160, Addressing - Global Address Data Association · ISO 19160, Addressing presented...

Documents

Transcript of ISO 19160, Addressing - Global Address Data Association · ISO 19160, Addressing presented...