ISA ANALYZER STDS.pdf

7/27/2019 ISA ANALYZER STDS.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/isa-analyzer-stdspdf 1/24

Analyzer System Inspectionand Acceptance

Approved 15 September 1998

ISA –RP76.0.01–1998

R E C O M M E N D E D P R A C T I

ISA The Instrumentation,Systems, and

Automation Society

–

TM



Copyright © 1998 by the Instrument Society of America. All rights reserved. Printed in the United

States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or

transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or oth-

erwise), without the prior written permission of the publisher.

ISA

67 Alexander Drive

P.O. Box 12277

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709

ISA – RP76.0.01 –1998, Analyzer System Inspection and Acceptance

ISBN: 1-55617-680-5



ISA-RP76.0.01-1998 3

Preface

This preface, as well as all footnotes and annexes, is included for informational purposes onlyand is not part of ISA-RP76.0.01-1998.

This recommended practice has been prepared as part of the service of ISA, the international

society for measurement and control, toward a goal of uniformity in the field of instrumentation.To be of real value, this document should not be static, but should be subject to periodic review.Toward this end, the Society welcomes all comments and criticisms, and asks that they beaddressed to the Secretary, Standards and Practices Board; ISA; 67 Alexander Drive; P. O. Box12277; Research Triangle Park, NC 27709; Telephone (919) 549-8411; Fax (919) 549-8288; E-mail: [email protected].

The ISA Standards and Practices Department is aware of the growing need for attention to themetric system of units in general, and the International System of Units (SI) in particular, in thepreparation of instrumentation standards, recommended practices, and technical reports. The

Department is further aware of the benefits to USA users of ISA standards of incorporatingsuitable references to the SI (and the metric system) in their business and professional dealings

with other countries. Toward this end, this Department will endeavor to introduce SI andacceptable metric units in all new and revised standards, recommended practices and technicalreports to the extent possible. Standard for Use of the International System of Units (SI): The Modern Metric System , published by the American Society for Testing & Materials as IEEE/ ASTM SI 10-97, and future revisions, will be the reference guide for definitions, symbols,abbreviations, and conversion factors.

It is the policy of ISA to encourage and welcome the participation of all concerned individuals andinterests in the development of ISA standards. Participation in the ISA standards-makingprocess by an individual in no way constitutes endorsement by the employer of that individual, ofISA, or of any of the standards, recommended practices, and technical reports that ISA develops.

CAUTION-

ISA ADHERES TO THE POLICY OF THE AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS

INSTITUTE WITH REGARD TO PATENTS. IF ISA IS INFORMED OF AN

EXISTING PATENT THAT IS REQUIRED FOR USE OF THE RECOMMENDED

PRACTICE, IT WILL REQUIRE THE OWNER OF THE PATENT TO EITHER

GRANT A ROYALTY-FREE LICENSE FOR USE OF THE PATENT BY USERS

COMPLYING WITH THE RECOMMENDED PRACTICE OR A LICENSE ON

REASONABLE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THAT ARE FREE FROM UNFAIR

DISCRIMINATION.

EVEN IF ISA IS UNAWARE OF ANY PATENT COVERING THIS

RECOMMENDED PRACTICE, THE USER IS CAUTIONED THAT

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RECOMMENDED PRACTICE MAY REQUIRE USE

OF TECHNIQUES, PROCESSES, OR MATERIALS COVERED BY PATENT

RIGHTS. ISA TAKES NO POSITION ON THE EXISTENCE OR VALIDITY OF

ANY PATENT RIGHTS THAT MAY BE INVOLVED IN IMPLEMENTING THE

RECOMMENDED PRACTICE. ISA IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING



4 ISA-RP76.0.01-1998

ALL PATENTS THAT MAY REQUIRE A LICENSE BEFORE IMPLEMENTATION

OF THE RECOMMENDED PRACTICE OR FOR INVESTIGATING THE

VALIDITY OR SCOPE OF ANY PATENTS BROUGHT TO ITS ATTENTION. THE

USER SHOULD CAREFULLY INVESTIGATE RELEVANT PATENTS BEFORE

USING THE RECOMMENDED PRACTICE FOR THE USER’S INTENDED

APPLICATION.

HOWEVER, ISA ASKS THAT ANYONE REVIEWING THIS RECOMMENDEDPRACTICE WHO IS AWARE OF ANY PATENTS THAT MAY IMPACT

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RECOMMENDED PRACTICE NOTIFY THE ISA

STANDARDS AND PRACTICES DEPARTMENT OF THE PATENT AND ITS

OWNER.

ADDITIONALLY, THE USE OF THIS RECOMMENDED PRACTICE MAY

INVOLVE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, OPERATIONS OR EQUIPMENT. THE

RECOMMENDED PRACTICE CANNOT ANTICIPATE ALL POSSIBLE

APPLICATIONS OR ADDRESS ALL POSSIBLE SAFETY ISSUES

ASSOCIATED WITH USE IN HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS. THE USER OF THIS

RECOMMENDED PRACTICE MUST EXERCISE SOUND PROFESSIONALJUDGMENT CONCERNING ITS USE AND APPLICABILITY UNDER THE

USER’S PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES. THE USER MUST ALSO

CONSIDER THE APPLICABILITY OF ANY GOVERNMENTAL REGULATORY

LIMITATIONS AND ESTABLISHED SAFETY AND HEALTH PRACTICES

BEFORE IMPLEMENTING THIS RECOMMENDED PRACTICE.

The following people served as members of ISA Committee SP76:

NAME COMPANY

D. Lewko, Chairman Bantrel Inc.

D. Rapley, Managing Director VECO Rapley Inc.

C. Ackerman Air Products & Chemicals Inc.

B. Anderson Ashland Petroleum Company

*K. Anderson Technical Automation Services Corp.

W. Bajek UOP

*J. Burkland Technical Automation Services Corp.

S. Chappell National Institute of Standards & Technology

*J. Converse Sterling Chemicals Inc.

*D. Coyle Applied Automation Inc.

W. Dailey Process Analyzer Resources Inc.G. Erk Consultant

C. Foresti Tosco Refining Company

M. Fraser Daniel Flow Products Inc.

P. Girling Mobil Technology Company

*R. Guillory Parsons SIP Inc.

J. Harman, III. Beckman Instruments Inc.

G. Harms Hemlock Semiconductor Corp.

J. Hensel Hach Company



ISA-RP76.0.01-1998 5

D. Hildebrand Vulcan Chemical Company

*F. Hormann Applied Automation Inc.

A. Iverson Ivy Optiks

K. Konrad Intek Corp.

M. Lanoue Delta F Corp.

*K. LeBlanc Exxon Chemical Company

*T. Lewis, Jr. Applied Automation Inc.

C. Lucarino Anarad Inc.V. Madian Imperial Oil

*J. Mayfield Shell Oil Company

J. McKinley Kin-Tek Labs Inc.

D. Merriman MerTech Inc.

E. Mooney Tytronics Inc.

R. Morris Flow Safe

M. Murray Sunoco Inc.

*R. Muston Shell Chemical Company

*G. Nichols Sterling Chemicals Inc.

R. Ohlmeier Merrick & Company

F. Palacio Analitec SLD. Ross Camtec Environ. Consultants

*J. Sablatura, Jr. Exxon Research and Engineering

D. Soleta Monsanto Company

R. Tarrant Nametre Company

J. Tatera Dow Corning Company

J. Thomason Omni Industrial Systems Inc.

*H. Tummala Parsons

J. Twork Tennessee Eastman Company

S. Ueda Fuji Technosurvey Company

*P. VanVunren Exxon Chemical Company

I. Verhappen Syncrude Canada Ltd.

M. Vickery ARCO Chemical

*W. Wagner Union Carbide Corp.

P. Wisneski, Jr. Chevron Research & Technology Company

D. Wright Microanalytics Instrument Corp.

*A. Yeager, Jr. Union Carbide Corp.

F. Zikas Parker Hannifin Corp.

*A. Znotins Shell Canada Ltd.

________________________

*One vote per company

This recommended practice was approved for publication by the ISA Standards and Practices

Board on September 15, 1998.

NAME COMPANY

R. Webb, Vice President Altran Corp.

H. Baumann H. D. Baumann Inc.



6 ISA-RP76.0.01-1998

D. Bishop Chevron Production Technology Company

P. Brett Honeywell Industrial Automation Controls

W. Calder III Factory Mutual Research Corp.

M. Cohen Flexonics Inc.

H. Dammeyer The Ohio State University

W. Holland Southern Company Services Inc.

H. Hopkins Retired

A. Iverson Ivy OptiksK. Lindner Endress + Hauser GmbH + Company

V. Maggioli Feltronics Corp.

T. McAvinew Instrumentation & Control Engineering LLC

A. McCauley, Jr. Chagrin Valley Controls Inc.

G. McFarland Honeywell Industrial Automation & Controls

E. Montgomery Fluor Daniel Inc.

D. Rapley VECO Rapley Inc.

R. Reimer Rockwell Automation A-B

J. Rennie Factory Mutual Research Corp.

W. Weidman Parsons Power Group Inc.

J. Weiss Electric Power Research InstituteJ. Whetstone National Institute of Standards & Technology

M. Widmeyer Carnegie-Mellon University

H. Wiegle Canus Corp.

C. Williams Eastman Kodak Company

G. Wood Graeme Wood Consulting

M. Zielinski Fisher•Rosemount



ISA-RP76.0.01-1998 7

Contents

1 Purpose........................................................................................................................ 9

2 Scope.......................................................................................................................... 9

3 Analyzer inspection guidelines ................................................................................ 93.1 Safety and health considerations during testing...................................... 93.2 Documentation availability and applicability .......................................... 103.3 Maintainability ............................................................................................ 103.4 Interfacing compatibility of this system with external or

connective devices..................................................................................... 103.5 Workmanship of tubing, wiring, conduit, supports, suitability for

transportation to site, personnel safety hazards .................................... 103.6 Mutually agreed tests and proofing methods ......................................... 10

4 Checklists..................................................................................................................11



ISA-RP76.0.01-1998 9

1 Purpose

The purpose of this recommended practice is to establish procedures for analyzer, packagedanalyzer system, and sample system inspection and testing. The guidelines are intended to

provide minimum requirements for inspecting and testing analyzers, sample systems, andanalyzer systems prior to final acceptance. In no instance is this recommended practice intended

to override any established company procedures.

2 Scope

The attached inspection guidelines are recommended for use during structured analyzer system

inspection. The inspection should be performed by qualified individuals. This recommendedpractice is intended to be a guide and not a "how to" document. These are guidelines and shouldbe modified to include any special project requirements. These guidelines cover three basicareas, which are:

a) ANALYZER INSPECTION: Inspection of an analyzer and the analyzer-specific applicationengineering.

b) PACKAGED ANALYZER SYSTEM INSPECTION: Inspection of an analyzer building, shelter,enclosure, highway controllers, and any other equipment used to support the analyzeroperation (other than the analyzer and its sample system).

c) SAMPLE SYSTEM INSPECTION: Inspection of all vendor-supplied equipment that will beinstalled between the process sample tap and the analyzer.

For the purposes of this document, STRUCTURED TESTING is defined as any witnessed testprocedure that follows a predefined format.

3 Analyzer inspection guidelines

3.1 Safety and health considerations during testing

The test host (i.e., analyzer manufacturer or system integrator) should be responsible to ensurethat the test site and all equipment meet all applicable electrical, safety and health requirementsof the authority having jurisdiction.



10 ISA-RP76.0.01-1998

3.2 Documentation availability and applicability

All documentation should be system specific, and the latest revisions of the applicabledocuments should be used. Any documentation not pertinent to the project should be deleted(unless previously agreed to otherwise). All applicable documentation should be readily available

at the time of the inspection. The documentation format should be as specified or agreed tobeforehand (including language).

3.3 Maintainability

Wherever possible, all equipment should be installed in such a manner that any hardware itemscan be easily removed without the removal of any other hardware. Easy tool access to screws,nuts, fittings, etc. should be available. All equipment should be mounted so that removablecovers are accessible and adequate clearance for removal is provided.

3.4 Interfacing compatibility of this system with external or connectivedevices

Analog and serial signals should be tested. Analog signals should be tested for linearity and

ground isolation. If specified, all externally interfaced equipment should be provided (i.e.,printers, recorders, plotters, protocol converters, etc.). All discrete outputs should be verified, asper the specification.

3.5 Workmanship of tubing, wiring, conduit, supports, suitability for trans-portation to site, personnel safety hazards

A small sample of tube fittings should be dismantled and checked for workmanship. All unfilled

sealing fittings should be clearly identified with a red tag. Piping, wiring, and conduit should besufficiently supported to withstand any anticipated vibration from site conditions or transportation.The inspector should check that there are no sharp edges, points or protrusions that could injure

personnel during transportation, placement, or use.

3.6 Mutually agreed tests and proofing methods

The requirements for an inspection need to be agreed to early in the project (one of the purposesof this document). Vendor pre-inspection tests, the number of test and calibration samples, theproof of their content, and the duration of stability tests should be as specified and/or agreed to.

Samples should contain all components of interest and all components that were identified on theapplication data sheet and that can interfere with this measurement. Whenever feasible, thecustomer should supply an acceptable analyzed standard for the inspection. Some portion of thestability test should be witnessed by the customer's representative. Test data should bepresented in the specified or agreed-to format (e.g., raw data, summaries, statistical evaluations,

or SPC charts).

All outstanding action items should be resolved before the conclusion of the acceptance test. Inthe event that an open item cannot be resolved, an expected date should be identified by whichthe item will be resolved. An action log such as that at the end of Clause 4 is recommended forthat purpose.



ISA-RP76.0.01-1998 11

4 Checklists

The following may be used as inspection checklists or as references to help prepare checklists. Itis suggested that any deviations from a checklist would be accepted only if agreed to in writing by

both the customer and the vendor. Each type of analyzer system and/or sample can have uniquerequirements. Several blanks have been left in the following inspection guides, so users may

easily incorporate additional items. Some of the listed items may not be relevant and may bedeleted from a particular checklist; they are intended only as guides.



12 ISA-RP76.0.01-1998

ANALYZER INSPECTION GUIDE

MANUFACTURER: DATE: MFG. ID#:PURCHASE ORDER: ANALYZER TAG NO.: SERIAL NO.:

V* = Vendor C* = Client

PARAMETER SPECIFIED WITNESS

V* C*

COMMENT

1 MECHANICAL

Dimensions

Mounting

Weight

2 ELECTRICAL

Volts

Hertz

Power (VA)

2.1 Effect of interruption

2.2 Insulation (Volts)

Grounding

R. F. shielding

2.3 Termination and wire labels

3 PIPING

3.1 Sample inlet

3.2 Sample return

3.3 Vent

3.4 Drain



ISA-RP76.0.01-1998 13





V* C*

COMMENT

3.5 Instrument air

3.6 Steam

3.7 Water

3.8 Reagent

3.9 Safety valve(s)

4 SAFETY

Area classification

Warning labels, signals,

purge

Personnel protection

Certification

Materials of construction

exposed to the process

5 FUNCTION

Zero

Span

5.1 Calibration

Number of points

Certified samples

Maximum deviation from

curve (% of measured value)

Response time rising



14 ISA-RP76.0.01-1998





V* C*

COMMENT

Response time falling

Stability (hours)

Repeatability

Noise band (% full

scale deviation)

Standard deviation

5.2 Signals

Output

Fully floating?Linearity (# points)

Minimum sensitivity

Serial communications

5.3 Environment

Effect of ambienttemperature

Effect of ambient

pressure

Materials of constructionexposed to ambientatmosphere

6 DOCUMENTATION/MANUALS



ISA-RP76.0.01-1998 15



This system has been Accepted By:

Rejected By:

Conditionally Accepted By:



V* C*

COMMENT

7 INDICATION

7.1 Local indicators

7.2 Local recorders



16 ISA-RP76.0.01-1998

SAMPLE SYSTEM INSPECTION GUIDE




V* C*

COMMENT

1 MECHANICAL

Dimensions

Enclosure

2 ELECTRICAL

3 PIPING/TUBING

Material compatibility

4 SAFETY

Area classification

Warning labels, signals,certification

Personnel safety

Hydrostatic test(s)

Gas leakage test

Flow limiters



ISA-RP76.0.01-1998 17





V* C*

COMMENT

5 ENVIRONMENT

Effect of ambienttemperature

Effect of ambientpressure

6 DOCUMENTATION

Identification tags/labels

7 COMPONENTS

Filters

Pressure gauges

Flowmeters

Relief valves

Accessibility

Maintainability

Identification tags



18 ISA-RP76.0.01-1998



All sample systems from entry of transport line should be tested at 1 - 1.5 times duty pressure.


Rejected By:




V* C*

COMMENT

8 OVERALL TEST

Sample loop(s)

Sample conditioning system

Stream selection

Calibration system



ISA-RP76.0.01-1998 19

PACKAGED ANALYZER SYSTEM INSPECTION GUIDE**


** A separate “Inspection Guide” should be completed for each sample conditioning system oreach analyzer.



V* C*

COMMENT

1 MECHANICAL

Dimensions & layout

Mounting

Weight

2 ELECTRICAL

Area classification

Certificate(s)

3 UTILITIES

Steam

Air

Water

Power circuit

Lighting

Vent header

Drain header



20 ISA-RP76.0.01-1998

PACKAGED ANALYZER SYSTEM INSPECTION GUIDE




V* C*

COMMENT

4 SAFETY

L.E.L. (Combustible)

Oxygen deficiency

Toxic

Flow limiters

Escape equipment

Isolation valve(s)

5 OVERALL FUNCTIONTEST

6 DOCUMENTATION

7 TAGGING

8 FAST LOOP ANDSAMPLING SYSTEM



ISA-RP76.0.01-1998 21

PACKAGED ANALYZER SYSTEM INSPECTION GUIDE



Rejected By:




V* C*

COMMENT

9 COMMON SAMPLERECOVERY SYSTEM

10 LEAKAGE TEST

Utility header(s)

11 VENTILATION SYSTEM

Ventilation

Heater

Air conditioner

Temperature control

Mechanical and finish inspection

Control/alarm systems



22 ISA-RP76.0.01-1998

ACTION LOG



Item

No.

Deviation Corrective Action Responsibility Witness

V* C*



Developing and promulgating technically sound consensus standards,

recommended practices, and technical reports is one of ISA's primary goals.To achieve this goal the Standards and Practices Department relies on thetechnical expertise and efforts of volunteer committee members, chairmen,and reviewers.

ISA is an American National Standards Institute (ANSI) accreditedorganization. ISA administers United States Technical Advisory Groups(USTAGs) and provides secretariat support for International ElectrotechnicalCommission (IEC) and International Organization for Standardization (ISO)committees that develop process measurement and control standards. Toobtain additional information on the Society's standards program, please write:

ISAAttn: Standards Department67 Alexander DriveP.O. Box 12277Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

ISBN: 1-55617-680-5

ISA ANALYZER STDS.pdf

Documents

Transcript of ISA ANALYZER STDS.pdf