8/13/2019 Is it Better to Be a Creative Generalist or a Specialist.docx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/is-it-better-to-be-a-creative-generalist-or-a-specialistdocx 1/6

Is it Better to Be a Creative Generalist or aSpecialist?March 11, 2008 by Mark McGuinness 

If creativity is your livelihood, is it a good idea to pursue multiple interests and develop a range of skills,or should you focus on one or two key talents and become the best around in your specialism?

I’m asking the question because two of my favourite blogs take completely opposite positions on thisissue. In the red corner, Steve Hardy devotes his entire blog to the concept of the Creative Generalist, and recently wrote an excellent post about What Specifically Do Generalists Do?. In the blue corner,advertising copywriter Scamp has this to say about creative generalism:

the idea enrages me so much that every time it pops up I feel the need to reach for a hammer, like I’m playing a blogging version of whack-a-mole.

At the risk of getting whacked by Scamp’s hammer (and of mixing metaphors) I’m going to look at bothsides of the question and see if I can referee the fight.

The Case for Creative Generalism

In his blog post What Specifically Do Generalists Do? Steve Hardy argues for the ‘secret talent’ ofgeneralists:

Nothing can substitute for depth of analysis, and there’s proven value in specialization – it’s whateducation, career paths, scientific research, and technological innovation are built on – butgeneralism is a secret talent. With so much complex information, fragmented in so many ways anddeveloping faster and faster, it is increasingly important to have generalists around to make sense of itall, of the big picture. People who appreciate diversity, who are in the know about the wider world and

who understand how things interact are invaluable observers, matchmakers, and pioneers of theintersectional ideas so vital for success in today’s knowledge economy, conceptual age, andglobal community.

He then describes the lists the following ‘core areas at which Creative Generalists excel’: 

• Wander & Wonder  – finding possibility• Synthesize & Summarize  – presenting information• Link & Leap  – generating ideas• Mix & Match  – connecting people

• Experience & Empathize  – understanding worldview

It’s a thorough, thoughtful post that repays the full ‘cup of tea and a sit down’ treatment. Steve alsomakes the case for generalism in a Creative Generalist manifesto for Change This. 

 Among Steve’s eclectic curiosity interviewees is Russell Davies, whose blog exemplifies many of thesecharacteristics of creative generalism. Russell also writes about creativegeneralism from time to time.One of the things I like about Russell’s blog is that you never know what you’re going to get next,from cashless telephone boxes to transport depots tothe action cook book to electroplanktonbaths and ukulele mashup genius. He’s a kind of innovation antenna for the rest of us, investigatingnovel technology and attitudes and extrapolating trends and possibilities.

The poet W.B. Yeats wrote a moving elegy for his friend Major Robert Gregory, in which he praised theyounger man as an artist, scholar and man of action:

8/13/2019 Is it Better to Be a Creative Generalist or a Specialist.docx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/is-it-better-to-be-a-creative-generalist-or-a-specialistdocx 2/6

Soldier, scholar, horseman, he, And all he did done perfectly As though he had but that one trade alone.

As poetry, I love these lines, but I would say that (if Yeats can be believed) Major Gregory was anuntypical generalist. Perfection of each kind is not usually what they are after, or what they deliver.They are more at home with the notebook or sketchpad (or these days the blog) than the marble plinthor three volume novel. Coleridge is a good example – described by his biographer Richard Holmes as‘the great master of the suggestive fragment’, he has a restless, omnivorous imagination that flits, inthe 6 volumes of hisNotebooks, from poetry to journalism to philosophy to plans for an ideal society inthe wilderness of America to recipes for beer to dreams to sexual fantasies to prayers to nature studiesand the colour of urine in a chamber pot. Several of his greatest poems, such as ‘Kubla Khan’and Christabel , were left unfinished.

Leonardo da Vinci was probably the ultimate creative generalist (or polymath or Renaissance man asthey used to be known). As a painter, sculptor, architect, scientist, mathematician, engineer, inventor,anatomist, botanist, writer and musician, he approached perfection in several disciplines – but also lefthis share of unfinished projects and suggestive fragments, such as the huge statue of a horse (‘Gran

Cavallo’) that was never cast in bronze, or the unfinished paintings of St Jerome and the Adoration ofthe Magi. More recently, some of my favourite generalists include Mervyn Peake (novelist, poet,painter, illustrator, sculptor), Brian Eno (musician, producer, thinker, installation artist) and ThomasHeatherwick (designer, architect, engineer, sculptor).

If I’ve whetted your appetite for generalism, you might enjoy these two blogs I discovered whileresearching this post: Eric Nehrlich, Unrepentant Generalist and The Martini Shaker. And TimFerriss’ Top 5 Reasons to Be a Jack of All Trades. Oh, and Leonardo’s finally got round to startinga blog. 

The Case for SpecialismThere’s a Japanese proverb that says if you try to chase two rabbits at once, you’ll lose both. Scamp isclearly of the ‘single rabbit’ school of thought and lists his Top 5 reasons why Specialism is better thanGeneralism. The thrust of his argument is that it’s rare to find someone who is able to perform well at awide range of skills, just as Johann Cruyff was almost unique among footballers in being able to‘defend, create goals and score goals’. He acknowledges that ‘great advertising requires differentskills’ but says it’s better to assemble a team of diverse specialists than to try to find all of them in thesame person.

Marcus Buckingham and Kurt Coffman make a similar point in their book First, Break All the Rules, where they argue that instead of trying to fix our weaknesses we should focus on developing ourstrongest talents. So for example, I could probably learn to play the guitar competently, but I don’t havemy brother’s talent for music, so I’ll never achieve any great distinction at it – or experience the kind ofsatisfaction he gets from playing in a really good band. I’m better off concentrating on writing, which issomething for which I have more talent and inclination. And less chance of being trounced by my littlebrother.

Scamp laid down the gauntlet to the champions of generalism in advertising:

Here’s my team of specialists – Johnny Hornby (CEO), Paul Feldwick (Head of Planning), RichardFlintham (ECD). Could anyone put up a team of three generalists, that would make a better agency

than HFF? I doubt it.

That was 8 months ago and so far no-one has done it, which suggests he has a point.

8/13/2019 Is it Better to Be a Creative Generalist or a Specialist.docx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/is-it-better-to-be-a-creative-generalist-or-a-specialistdocx 3/6

Scamp receives staunch support from another advertising man, Winston Fletcher, in hisbook Tantrums and Talent – How to get the best from creative people:

In the creative industries specialisation of labour applies with a vengeance. Most creators, thought theymay not realise it, have a narrow range of creative abilities. Feature writers rarely make good fictionswriters; designers are quite different from illustrators; fashion photographers can’t shoot portraits; still photographers can’t shoot movies; in advertising few creators of press advertising are really good attelevision commercials…. one of my partners is an outstanding editor of comedy programmes. At a pinch he can edit anything – but he has an instinct for the timing of hilarious sequences.(Tantrums and Talent, p.49)

Fletcher does acknowledge the existence of generalists, but like Scamp he sees them as theexception to the rule of creative specialisation:

There are exceptions, but they are so infrequent as to be noteworthy. Some of the most massivelytalented creative people – Sir Lawrence Olivier and Orson Welles spring to mind – have been able tomaster a wide range of disparate creative roles. Such multi-faceted talents are few and far between.The creative manager should almost always urge creators to keep to their last, and to excel at the

things they do well, rather than allow them to try and be jacks-of-all-trades.(Tantrums and Talent, p.49)

It’s worth checking out the comments on Scamp’s post, for a lively debate about the issue, includingother footballers who can defend, create and score.

Dave Gray’s solution – generalists are best at defining problems,specialists at solving them

Dave Gray suggests that we should look at generalists and specialists as playing complementary roles

in the creative process. Generalists have the breadth of knowledge to be able to survey the big pictureand identify critical problems and goals, but they may not have the specialist knowledge to solve theproblem or execute the plan.

It’s an appealing idea that seems to fit the traditional division of labour in advertising agencies betweenplanners (strategic generalists who define the goal) and creatives (specialists who solve the problemwith their creative execution). Maybe we can imagine a team including planner Russell Davies and hiseclectic enthusiasms, and Scamp bringing his laser-like creative focus to the execution. I’d love to be afly on the wall.

David Armano finds a ‘lot of truth’ in Dave Gray’s diagram, but suggests that the roles are not alwaysso clearly defined:

Generalists can excel at both defining and solving problems but may require the assistance ofspecialists as they go deeper into execution. Specialists can excel in defining the problem especiallywhen it falls within their area of expertise. Are we saying the same thing? I think the difference isstressing that both can actually function in the other’s “role” depending on the individual and context. 

Coming back to advertising as an example, it’s not hard to detect both sides resisting the straitjacket oftheir roles, with cheeky planners wondering whether they are the new creatives and awkwardcreatives challenging the creative briefs that planners work so hard on. Having said that, I think Dave’sdiagram does a good job of clarifiying the essential differences between generalists and specialists,and their complementary functions.

8/13/2019 Is it Better to Be a Creative Generalist or a Specialist.docx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/is-it-better-to-be-a-creative-generalist-or-a-specialistdocx 4/6

So come on then, which is better?

Image by  Steve Hardy  

As usual with this kind of debate, I can see the merits of both sides. The world would be a poorer placewithout the Leonardos, Coleridges, Heatherwicks, Davies and Peakes dipping their fingers into asmany pies as they can. Equally, I wouldn’t want to stop Scamp haring after his rabbit. 

To get myself off the charge of sitting on the fence, I’m tempted to quote F. Scott Fitzgerald: ‘The testof a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and stillretain the ability to function.’ But I’ll resist the temptation. 

Instead I’ll quote Steve Hardy again, who sees generalists and specialists as ‘two sides of the samecoin’: 

the best fireworks are generated when the two approaches are somehow blended  –in either anindividual’s mindset or in an organization’s structure–and arranged to work together in concert.

To me, ‘creative generalist or specialist?’ is a false dichotomy. Apart from the argument that the tworoles are complementary, the question assumes that ‘creative’ is an easily identifiable, homogenousquality. It isn’t. It can be applied to all kinds of activities, disciplines and professions, some of which arebetter suited to generalists, some specialists.

 A third way? David Armano’s T-shaped Creativity

8/13/2019 Is it Better to Be a Creative Generalist or a Specialist.docx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/is-it-better-to-be-a-creative-generalist-or-a-specialistdocx 5/6

 

Image by  David Armano 

David Armano’s concept of T-shaped creativity which he described in a post for theMarketing Profsblog, gives us another way of looking at the specialist/generalist division:

The notion is simple – cultivate people on your team that have a core competency, but can easily

branch out (like the shape of a T). They ideally possess traits such as curiosity, empathy andaren’t afraid to ask why. And there is a distinction between this type of individual vs. a “jack -of-all trades.†• The core competency and branches are complimentary, with the branches beingsecondary strengths. It represents breadth and depth of skills.

In terms of an individual’s skill-set, the vertical stroke comprises specialist skills and knowledge, whilethe horizontal stroke represents the generalist skills that enable the person to position their specialismin a way that it is useful and desirable for others. We can see this as a variation of the classic definitionof creativity as novelty + value. Thenovel element derives from the vertical stroke of the T – whichDavid labels ‘creative driven’, comprising insights, ideas and concepts. The horizontal stroke of the T isconcerned with value  – whether the new ideas and products are useful and/or desirable. At the

intersection of the T a useable end product.

For example: my own core specialisms (the vertical stroke of the T) are:

  writing

  facilitating change (as a coach, trainer or therapist)In order to make these skills relevant, attractive and useful to others, while working as an independentconsultant, I’ve developed some knowledge and competence in the following areas, which comprisethe horizontal stroke of the T:

  blogging

  marketing

  networking

8/13/2019 Is it Better to Be a Creative Generalist or a Specialist.docx

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/is-it-better-to-be-a-creative-generalist-or-a-specialistdocx 6/6

  sales

  accounting

  presentation skills

  intellectual property law

  organisation theory

  strategy

  project management

  negotiation

  entrepreneurship

  time managementOne reason I took time out to study for an MA in Creative & Media Enterprises was to broaden myknowledge of the creative industries sector so that I could position my core skills in a way that wouldbe meaningful to my clients. At a basic level, this means clients feel comfortable when they find I can‘speak their language’ and have some understanding of the challenges they face. I would definitely saythat studying for the MA broadened my mind – at the same time it was something of a relief to return tomy own writing afterwards, and to get back to working with clients face-to-face.

I never knowingly pass up an opportunity to compare myself to Shakespeare, so I’ll wheel him on asmy next example. It’s hard to think of anyone with a greater specialist talent for writing, or whoachieved more with such a talent (the vertical stroke of the T). Yet he was also a competent actor anda highly successful businessman as a partner in the acting company The King’s Men (the horizontalstroke). The various aspects of his career were not in conflict, but created a dynamic creative tensionthat led to enormous creative and professional success.

The T-shaped model suggests that we are all generalists and specialists to some degree. Somepeople will have a longer vertical stroke, others a wider cross stroke, with many variations of size and

proportion. (No sniggering at the back, please.) The most wide-ranging generalist will usually have oneor two favourite specialisms at which s/he excels; and even the most committed specialist will needsome grasp of other disciplines if s/he wants to achieve recognition and rewards. Scamp recentlyblogged about starting to work as a creative director – a role that requires new skills, as a facilitator ofothers’ creativity, helping them catch their own rabbits. 

Specialist schools in the UK  are state schools that have proved that they’re exceptional in a

particular department such as art or technology. The different specialisms are: • Sports 

• Science 

• Maths and Computing 

• Technology  

• Business and Enterprise 

• Humanities 

• Languages 

• Arts 

• Applied learning 

• Engineering 

• Music