Irrigation Management Reforms: The Asia Experience, by Madar Samad, IWMI
-
Upload
global-water-partnership -
Category
Travel
-
view
560 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Irrigation Management Reforms: The Asia Experience, by Madar Samad, IWMI
Water for a food-secure world
Madar Samad International Water Management Institute
Irrigation Management Reforms: The Asian Experience
GWP -IWMI Workshop on Climate Change, Food, and Water Security
24-25 February 2011
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
COUNTRIES WHERE IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT REFORMS HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Are schemes that have been transferred to Water
User Associations performing better than when
they were under agency management ?
A Key Question
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Performance Indicators:
• Improve the quality of irrigation service to farmers.
• Improved maintenance of irrigation facilities.
• Improve the agricultural production performance.
• Financial viability of WUAs
•
• User fee collection and increase in WUAs share of the cost of
irrigation O&M.
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
STUDY SITES OF IWMI 1990-2000
Mexico Philippines
China
Indonesia
Sri Lanka
Bangladesh
India Sudan
USA Nepal Pakistan
Colombia
Nigeria
Burkina
Faso
Niger
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Recent Review of Case Studies: Distribution and location of cases
- Mukherji et al, 2010
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Selection of case studies
– Cases post 1994 period
– Only public owned irrigation schemes
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Some Results (from Mukherji et al, 2010)
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Finding patterns in success: Success by type of scheme
PIM in Lift and pump
schemes are marginally
more successful than canal
systems
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Success by size of system
Schemes serving lesser number of farmers succeed marginally more
Small schemes perform
marginally better
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Success by complexity
PIM is marginally
more successful in
Simple schemes
more
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Success by crops grown
PIM in Non-paddy systems
succeed significantly more than
paddy systems
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Rehabilitated systems fare better than non-rehabilitated ones
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Cases where full O&M is transferred perform better
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Higher Failure of PIM in Schemes Implemented by Government Agencies
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Distribution of success/failure as per CSS
Region Success Failure
S Asia 18 20
E Asia 7 2
SE Asia 12 24
C Asia 4 14
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Overall Assessment
• The recent results are largely consistent with earlier
research findings – mixed performance
• Service provision has largely improved and arrested
the anarchy of the pre 1990s era
• Despite uncertainties IMT continues to be a major
component of institutional reform programs
worldwide.
• Some loss in the momentum of the early 1990s
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Why has PIM/IMT has largely a limited Impact?
1. Conceptual Problem?
2. Implementation Failure?
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Conceptual Problem?
1. Central concept of PIM is collective action by farmers
2.
1. Collective action by user/beneficiary groups have succeeded in many areas of NRM: Community forestry, fisheries, watershed management, milk producers, small tank irrigation systems
3 Lin Ostrom was awarded the Nobel Prize for Economics primarily for her work on collective action in NRM
4 “tragedy of the commons” has been avoided and
communally managed irrigation systems have
stood the test of time (Ostrom et al)
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Key Questions ? If Collective Action has largely succeeded in many areas
of NRM, why has there been limited success in large scale government management irrigation schemes?
Implementation Failures? − Reforms only at the lowest level − Irrigation agency intact
Partial Reforms, Partial Success!
Neglect of Main system Management? – David Mosse: Rule of Water
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Throw the Baby and the Bathwater?
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Four key lessons about WUAs:
Lesson 1:
Enabling environment + support = Capable WUA
(Ex: Mexico, Indonesia & Paliganj, Bihar)
Lesson 2: WUA w/o empowerment = common, but not productive or sustainable
WUA w/ empowerment = rare, but productive & sustainable (Mexico, places in Andhra Pradesh & Indonesia)
Lesson 3:
Rehabilitation/Construction = incentive to form WUA, but is risky (Many Asian cases vs Madagascar, USA )
Lesson 4:
PIM should be integrated with broader reforms in irrigation, agriculture & environment (Ex: Mexico)
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
The Way Forward
• Need to focus on evolving a strategy that addresses
the entire complex of constraints that farmers in irrigation schemes are facing.
• The first step must be to enhance the income
creation potential of smallholder irrigated farming:
– strengthening market access,
– promoting high-value crops
– improving extension and technical support to smallholder
irrigators.
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
• Irrigation schemes should be run as enterprises (public or private)
• Replace administrative systems with service delivery arrangements
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
OPTIONS
Reform and Strengthen Public Irrigation Agencies – difficult but not impossible
• Persist with PIM and provide effective
support systems to WUAs • PIM Support Units In Andhra Pradesh
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
• Look for Institutions beyond State, Parastatals
or Farmer Organizations
Contractual arrangements between private
irrigation service providers and irrigators (WUAs)
⁻ China, Kyrgyzstan
⁻ Contract between agency and private providers for main
systems management.
Political Acceptability of private sector engagement ?
- Bangladesh water policy states that the management of
large scale irrigation systems will handed over to private
sector
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
• Sri Lanka – Farmer companies:
Companies undertake input supply, credit and marketing commitments
• Lessons other institutions in the Agricultural Sector:
– Farmer Cooperatives
– Dairy coops in India
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Andhra Pradesh: Mobile Phone based
Information System for Efficient Water
Management
1. First one is Reservoir Storage Monitoring System
(RSMS)
2. Canal Network Flow Monitoring System
(CNFMS).
Mobile phone technology used to develop two
applications:.
Water for a food-secure world
Mobile Phone Based Information System for Main Canal Management – Andhra Pradesh
Water for a food-secure world
Water for a food-secure world
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Mobile technology enabled actual assessment of water
flows in each distributary on a daily basis which helps
to identify the water flows against the planned and
actual design discharge.
Timely information dissemination helped farmer
organizations to undertake timely flood management
measures.
Low Cost (Rs 0.20/SMS)
This enhanced transparency and accountability
between irrigation officials and FOs and
resulted in judicious use of water.
Water for a food-secure world Water for a food-secure world
Thank you