Irrigation Course Training

download Irrigation Course Training

of 63

Transcript of Irrigation Course Training

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    1/63

    An Irrigation Crash

    Course: How to CalculateYour Orchards Water

    Needs

    David Doll

    UCCE Merced

    1-19-2011

    North San Joaquin Valley Almond Day

    David Doll

    UC Farm Advisor,

    Merced County

    Carolyn Debuse

    UC Farm Advisor,

    Yolo/Solano County

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    2/63

    Irrigation scheduling

    How much water does your crop needthis irrigation?

    Evapotranspiration

    (ET0 = ETC x KC /irrigation efficiency)

    How much water is being applied perirrigation set?

    Measure

    Flow meter

    Irrigation efficiency testing

    Coffee can test

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    3/63

    Water Export of the Orchard

    Transpiration needed for plantgrowth

    Evaporation Due toenvironmentalconditions

    Runoff/

    GroundwaterRecharge Due toover-application

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    4/63

    Two (official) ways to schedule

    irrigation

    Apply water in anestimate to meet demand

    1. Can use historical ET

    values for the Sacramento

    Valley

    2. Needs to be adjusted if

    under-applied

    3. Over-application may be

    lost to deep percolation

    Apply water to replacewater used that week

    1. Can use real time CIMIS ET

    values and calculate crop

    use

    2. Can use historical ET values

    for the Sacramento Valley

    3. Over application may be lost

    to deep percolation

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    5/63

    How do we calculate water use?

    ETc = ETo x kc

    Evapo-transpiration of

    the Crop of Interest

    (almonds)

    Evapo-transpiration of the

    reference crop (grass)

    Crop Coefficient ratio of

    water need of crop v/s water

    need of grass

    Known,

    Variable

    Known,

    FixedUnknown

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    6/63

    How do we figure out Eto?

    1). CIMIS

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    7/63

    How do we figure out Eto?

    1). CIMIS

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    8/63

    What about the crop coefficient?

    Research has been done to determine this:

    Almond Orchard

    Kc by Month

    Dec/

    Jan

    Feb Mar Apr May June/Jul

    y/Aug

    Sept Oct Nov

    With cover Crop 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.95 1.05 1.15 1.10 0.90 0.85

    Without Cover

    Crop

    0 0 0.50 0.70 0.85 0.90 0.80 0.75 0.65

    The Almond Production Manual, handout in the back

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    9/63

    Calculating Orchard Water Use

    Week ETo for the

    week (Grass

    water use)

    provided byCIMIS

    Almond Kc

    for the month

    of May

    ETc for the

    week

    (water lost

    from theorchard)

    Cumulative total

    of water use by

    the Almond

    Orchard w/cover crop

    May 1st-

    7th

    1.65 1.05 1.74 1.74

    8th - 14th 1.20 1.05 1.26 1.26 + 1.74 = 3

    15th- 21st 1.39 1.05 1.46 3 + 1.46 = 4.46

    22nd-28th 1.19 1.05 1.25 4.46 + 1.25 =

    5.71

    29th- 31st 0.72 1.05 0.76 5.71 + 0.76 =

    6.47

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    10/63

    We now know Etc, but how much do weneed to apply to each tree?

    Water use (Gals/day) = crop spacing (ft2)

    x ET (In/day) x 0.623

    How do we calculate a water

    application?

    Example: ET is 0.25 in/day, spacing is 22 x 18

    Tree Crop spacing 22x18 = 396 ft2

    Water use per tree = 396 x 0.25 x 0.623 =

    61.68 gallons/day

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    11/63

    Thats it? WellNo

    Take into account water holding capacity

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    12/63

    Soil water holding capacity

    Field capacity =water remaining in the soilafter free water from rain or irrigation has

    drained out ( 3-4 days)

    Permanent wilting point= amount of waterstill left in the soil that the plant can not

    absorb

    Available water= Field capacity-permanent

    wilting point= usable water for plant

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    13/63

    Soil water holding capacity

    Field CapacityPermanent

    wilting point

    Available

    water

    Allowable

    depletion50%

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    14/63

    Root Zone

    Rooting zone must be taken in toconsideration

    2 feet

    4.5 foot

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    15/63

    Available water

    Type of Soil Range in/ft Average

    in/ftVery Course to course texture

    sand0.5 to1.00 0.75

    Moderately course sandy loams 1.00 to 1.50 1.25

    Medium textured- fine sandyloam to silty clay loam 1.25 to 1.75 1.50

    Fine and very fine- silty clay to

    clay1.50 to 2.50 2.00

    Peats and mucks 2.00 to 3.00 2.50

    Estimate the available water and multiply by rooting depth

    Example: yolo silty clay loam at field capacity= 1.50 in/ft x

    5 ft rooting depth= 7. 5 in available water to tree

    Allowable depletion= 3.75 in

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    16/63

    Soil

    SurfaceSoil Texture

    Depth

    in Feet

    Available

    Water Holding Ca

    pacity (From

    Table 3)

    Availablewater in each

    soil layer (in)

    1"-12" Sand 1 0.6 0.6

    13"-24" Loamy Sand 1 0.8 0.8

    25-42" Sandy Loam 1.5 1.0 1.5

    Total: 2.9

    Needs to be determined once in orchards life.

    Water Holding Capacity

    Allowable Depletion: 1.45

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    17/63

    So, That has to be it? WellNo Take into irrigation system inefficiency

    System Ea (%)

    Basin/Flood 65 - 80

    Furrow 65-75

    Solid Set Sprinkler 75-85

    Micro-sprinkler 85-90

    Drip

    90-95

    Slightly more water will be needed to ensure that the trees

    receive adequate water

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    18/63

    How do we calculate water use?

    ETo x kc

    EaETc =

    If total more than WHC, than irrigate more

    frequently to match water applied with WHC

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    19/63

    Bringing It All Together: The Weather

    Date Eto (in) Precip (in) Max Air Min Air

    7/3/2011 0.27 0.0 104.1 82.1

    7/4 0.26 0.0 108.2 82.6

    7/5 0.27 0.0 103.9 82.9

    7/6 0.27 0.0 94.7 79.8

    7/7 0.28 0.0 91.6 76.6

    7/8 0.26 0.0 94.2 77.8

    7/9 0.26 0.0 86.5 71.5

    TOTAL 1.87 0.0

    CIMIS: Nicolaus Station 30, Week of July 3rd, 2011

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    20/63

    Bringing It All Together: The Site

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    21/63

    Bringing It All Together: The Site

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    22/63

    Bringing It All Together: The Site

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    23/63

    Soil Profile

    Depth

    Soil Type WHC

    (Inches/Foot)

    Available Water

    0 12 Loamy Fine Sand 1.2 1.0* 1.2 = 1.2

    13 20 Sandy Loam 1.3 0.67 * 1.3 = 0.87

    2127 Sandy Loam 1.4 0.58 * 1.4 = 0.8228 36 Fine Sandy Loam 1.7 0.75 * 1.7 = 1.26

    37 42 Fine Sandy Loam 1.7 0.6 * 1.7 = 0.85

    TOTAL: 5.00

    5.00 of AWHC * 50% Depletion Percentage =2.50 of Usable, Refillable Water

    Bringing It All Together: The Site

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    24/63

    Mature 22 x 18, Nonpareil, Aldridge,

    Sonora on P/A Hybrid

    Microsprinkler, 14 pattern @ 10 GPA

    Tested, highly uniform irrigation

    distribution with efficiency rated at

    93%

    Bringing It All Together: Scenario 1

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    25/63

    ETc: (1.87 inches*1.15)/0.93 = 2.31 inches

    AWHC:

    2.50 inches (checks out!) Water Use per week: (396)(0.623)(2.31)=570 gallons/week

    Pump Time:

    570 gallons/week*Hour/10 gallon =57 Hours/Week

    Bringing It All Together: Scenario 1

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    26/63

    Mature 22 x 18, Nonpareil, Aldridge,Sonora on P/A Hybrid

    Double Line Drip, 0.5 gallons/emitter,

    Emitter every 36 inches, 12emitters/tree

    Tested, highly uniform irrigation

    distribution with efficiency rated at95%

    Bringing It All Together: Scenario 2

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    27/63

    ETc: (1.87 inches*1.15)/0.95 = 2.26 inches

    AWHC: 2.50 inches (checks out!)

    Water Use per week: (396)(0.623)(2.26)=557 gallons/week

    Pump Time:

    557 gallons/week*Hour/(12 emitters*0.5 GPH) =93 Hours/Week

    Bringing It All Together: Scenario 2

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    28/63

    Irrigation scheduling

    How much water does your crop needthis irrigation?

    Evapotranspiration

    (ET0 x ETC x irrigation efficiency)

    How much water is being applied perirrigation set?

    Measure

    Flow meter

    Irrigation efficiency testing

    Coffee can test

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    29/63

    Part 2: RecommendedTechnology and Its Usefor Irrigation Decision-

    Making

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    30/63

    Irrigation scheduling

    When should you start irrigation and

    how much to apply and how effective

    is it?

    Soil moisture monitoring

    Plant based monitoring

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    31/63

    Soil Monitoring

    Water holding capacity of soil

    Available water

    Root zone

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    32/63

    Soil Monitoring

    Ways to monitor soil

    Soil moisture (water content)

    Hand feel

    Neutron probe Capacitance probe

    Soil tension (centibars)

    Resistance blocks

    Tensiometer

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    33/63

    Soil Monitoring

    Direct soil moisture by feel

    Wet medium-

    textured soil

    Dry medium-

    textured soil

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    34/63

    Soil Monitoring

    Direct soil moisture by feel Needs a well practiced hand

    Good way to learn your soil types and theirwater holding ability

    Testing your other methods

    Simplest tools required

    Shovel

    Soil augur

    Con: takes a long time and often do not go todeepest rooting depths

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    35/63

    Soil Monitoring

    Soil tension Definition: measures the surface tension that the

    water is held to the soil

    The tension increases as soils dry, plants spend

    more energy Measurement unit centibars (cb)

    Types

    Tensiometer

    Resistance blocks

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    36/63

    Soil Monitoring

    Tensiometer

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    37/63

    Soil Monitoring

    Tensiometer

    Pros:

    no power needed

    Not affected by salinity

    Easy to install

    Not expensive

    Cons:

    Requires maintenance

    Not good for dry soil- can lose soil contact

    Manually read and keep records

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    38/63

    Soil Monitoring

    Modified electrical resistance Similar to the gypsum blocks but now are a

    composite

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    39/63

    Soil Monitoring

    Reading Soil TensionUse the following readings as a general

    guideline:

    0-10 Centibars = Saturated soil

    10-30 Centibars = Soil is adequately wet

    (except coarse sands, which are beginning to

    lose water)

    30-60 Centibars = Usual range for irrigation

    (most soils)

    60-100 Centibars = Usual range for

    irrigation in heavy clay

    100-200 Centibars = Soil is becoming

    dangerously dry for maximum production.

    Proceed with caution!

    http://www.irrometer.com

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    40/63

    Water mark automated data

    40

    Watermark Data Collected Automatically

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    41/63

    Soil Monitoring

    Modified electrical resistance Pros-

    No maintenance

    Least cost

    Can have many sensors going different depths and areas Possible to use data loggers or remotely

    Easy hand held meter option

    Easy to install

    Cons-

    Can have problems contacting soil in course textures

    Can be affected by salinity

    Need to periodically replace them (3-4 years)

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    42/63

    Soil Monitoring

    Actual water content

    Neutron probe

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    43/63

    Sample Neutron Probe Data

    Soil

    Depth

    inches

    Field

    Capacity

    (in/ft)

    Wilting

    Point

    (in/ft) June 1(in/ft)

    June 1

    (%)Depleted June 8(in/ft)

    June 8

    (%)Depleted

    8 3.4 1.7 2.5 53 1.9 88

    18 3.6 1.8 2.8 44 2.2 77

    30 3.2 1.6 3.0 13 2.8 24

    42 3.2 1.6 3.2 0 3.1 6

    54 3.2 1.6 3.2 0 3.2 0

    Total

    (in/5 ft)16.6 8.3 14.7 ------ 13.0 -----

    %

    Depleted

    Rootzone0 100 22 ------ 43 -----

    43

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    44/63

    Sample Neutron Probe Data

    6.00

    6.50

    7.00

    7.50

    8.00

    8.50

    9.00

    9.50

    10.00

    4/26

    5/10

    5/24

    6/7

    6/21

    7/5

    7/19

    8/2

    8/16

    8/30

    9/13

    9/27

    10/11

    InchesWaterper3-footrootzone

    Date 2002

    Low Stress Plots Mild Stress Moderate Stress

    44

    Field Capacity

    Wilting Point

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    45/63

    Soil MonitoringNeutron probe

    Pros: Adapts to many soil types

    Reads actual water content

    Only need to install access tubes

    Reads multiple depths in one tube Cons:

    Need radiation license to use

    Needs to be calibrated to soil type

    Reading includes water that is not free for plant use

    Not possible to automate

    Dependent on consultant

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    46/63

    46

    Dielectric Soil Moisture Sensors

    Two Dielectric Methods Capacitance probes - frequency domain

    reflectometry (FDR)

    Time domain reflectometry (TDR)

    Many sensors available EnviroSmart

    Irrimax

    Aquacheck

    C-probe

    Trase Trime

    ThetaProbe

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    47/63

    47

    General Dielectric Concept

    Measure dielectric constant or ability of amaterial to establish an electrical field

    Air dielectric constant of 1

    Dry soil dielectric constant of 3 to 5 Water dielectric constant of about 80

    Change in dielectric constant for soil indicates changein soil moisture

    More moisture increases the dielectric constant or

    the ability of the soil to concentrate the electricalfield

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    48/63

    Soil Monitoring

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    49/63

    49

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    50/63

    Soil MonitoringDielectric sensors

    Pros:

    Increased accuracy with calibration to soil type

    Reads actual water content

    Able to automate readings

    Cons:

    Complicated electronics

    Requires power

    Some may be effected by salts or heavy soils

    Errors can occur with loss of soil contact with sensor

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    51/63

    Plant Based monitoring

    Pressure chamber

    Midday Stem WaterPotential (MSWP) or

    (SWP)- measures

    resistance in bars

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    52/63

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    53/63

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    54/63

    Take reading between 12-3 pm

    Bag shaded leaf near trunk

    Wait 15 minutes before reading

    Only remove one leaf at a time

    Record time and temp forbaseline reading

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    55/63

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    56/63

    Plant Based Monitoring

    Baseline: it is the reading that would

    occur on a well watered tree at that

    temperature (F) and percent relative

    humidity (RH%)

    Each reading taken is compared to the

    baseline

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    57/63

    Baseline

    Example: 90F @ 30%RH= baseline of -8.1 bars

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    58/63

    Plant Based Monitoring

    Irrigation decisions Mature trees- allow SWP to drop 1-2 bars

    below baseline before irrigating

    Do not irrigate in spring until SWP is below

    baseline (3-4 bars)

    Irrigate enough to bring SWP back to near

    baseline (-7 to -8 bars)

    Young trees should be kept near baseline topromote growth

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    59/63

    Using SWP to Schedule Irrigation

    0

    -10

    -20

    -30

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    60/63

    -30.0

    -28.0

    -26.0

    -24.0

    -22.0

    -20.0

    -18.0

    -16.0

    -14.0

    -12.0

    -10.0

    -8.0

    -6.0

    -4.02/15

    2/25

    3/7

    3/17

    3/27

    4/6

    4/16

    4/26

    5/6

    5/16

    5/26

    6/5

    6/15

    6/25

    7/5

    7/15

    7/25

    8/4

    8/14

    8/24

    9/3

    9/13

    9/23

    10/3

    10/13

    10/23

    11/2

    11/12

    11/22

    MiddayStemWaterPo

    tential(-bars)

    Midday Stem Water Potential Levels in C8 Almond Orchard at Surface RenewalLocation, 2010.

    .

    Orchard Reading Predicted reading when fully irrigated

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    61/63

    Plant Based Monitoring

    Pros: Soil type does not affect reading

    Salinity does not effect reading

    Can monitor in any area of the orchard No installation

    Cons:

    Time consuming

    Need trained personnel

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    62/63

    Putting the tools to work

    1. Track ET

    2. Monitor soil moisture

    3. Collect pressure chamber readings

    4. Irrigate

    5. Checking results

  • 8/3/2019 Irrigation Course Training

    63/63

    WaterRight.org online tool for ET

    Irrigation Scheduling (Fresno State)

    The California Microirrigation Pocket

    Guide, available at your local NRCSoffice

    Local Farm Advisor

    UC IPM Guide

    Getting Help