Ironic effects of online customer care icoria 2010
-
date post
19-Oct-2014 -
Category
Business
-
view
405 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Ironic effects of online customer care icoria 2010
Peter KerkhofSonja Utz
Camiel BeukeboomVU University Amsterdam
Dept. of Communication Science9th International Conference on Research in Advertising
ICORIA, June 25/26 2010Madrid, Spain
The ironic effects of organizational responses to negative online consumer reviews
The rise of social media
• 2003: No Facebook, no Twitter, no Linkedin, no Hyves
• 2009:• Hyves 10.000.000 members in the Netherlands• Facebook: 4000.000.000 members, 600.000 new members,
60.000.000 use mobile Facebook• Linkedin: 53.000.000 members, 1 new member each second
(86.000 daily)• 75.000.000 members on Twitter, 800.000 tweets per hour
• 19% of all tweets is brand related• 20% of all brand related tweets is evaluative
– 55% positive, 33% negative
Source: Jansen et al., 2009
Brands in social media
Brands in social media
Brands in social media
Brands in social media
Brands in social media
The effects of consumer generated content
• Productevaluations
• Sales
• Brand awareness
• Reputation
• Trust
Brands have started to respond
Top 100 Dutch brands (2009):- 35 present in social media- mainly Twitter & Hyves
Brands have started to respond
Online reputation management:- Monitoring- Adding content - Starting brand communities - Influencing the influencers- Responding to online complaint & questions
Brands have started to respond
Brands have started to respond
Brands have started to respond
• Interpersonal • Computer-mediated• Public• Shared• On consumers’ territory
A new kind of brand communication
A new kind of brand communication
• Customer care• Marketing• PR• Sales• Product development
• Audience effects of responding to online complaints
• No response vs. ....–Apologies vs. denial– Informal (vs. formal) responses–Empathic reactions– .....
• Source effects
Our research
• Dependent variables– Credibility (competence, integrity)– Product evaluations– Review(er) credibility– Communicated customer commitment– Conversational human voice – Underdog effect
Our research
Design
Complaint
Apologies
Formal
Informal
Denial
Formal
Informal
No response
• Online experiments• n = 20 – 25 per cell• Apologies vs. denial vs.no response• Dependent variables: evaluation of brand,
review(er), • Moderator: prior brand involvement
Study 1
Study 1
Study 1
Study 1
Results
Results
Results
• Study 1:• online customer care backfires
• organizational competence • reviewer competence• severity of complaint
• especially (but not only)•when responsibility is denied•among brand involved customers
Study 2: Effects of informal vs. formal responses
- 2 (formal vs. informal) x 2 (apologies vs. financial compensation) design + control
Results Study 2
• Cognitive responses• Communicated relational commitment • Conversational voice• Fairness • Underdog effect
Positive effects of informal responses
Perso
onlijk
, exc
uses
Onper
soon
lijk, e
xcus
es
Perso
onlijk
, ver
goed
ing
Onper
soon
lijk, v
ergo
eding
Geen r
eacti
e0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
Cognitive responses (% positive)
Study 3
- Replicates effects of informal reactions
- Moderation by company size
Conclusions
- be careful how to respond to brand mentions in social media
- be informal
- apologize when necessary
- is not responding still an option?