IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison
description
Transcript of IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison
![Page 1: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
IRMPFire & Rescue Service Comparison
Fire Authority Meeting
10th October 2007
![Page 2: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
IRMPSetting standards
• Out of the Line of Fire - Home Office Report 1998.• Old response standards (1958)
Risk cat. No. pumps Time 1 Time 2 Time 3
A 3 5 5 8
B 2 5 8 -
C 1 8 - 10 - -
D 1 20 - -
High Risk PDA
![Page 3: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
IRMPSetting standards
• Out of the Line of Fire - Home Office Report 1998.• Old response standards (1958)
PDAHigh Risk
--201D
--8 - 101C
-852B
8553A
Time 3Time 2Time 1No. pumpsRisk cat.
These st
andards were to
be achieve
d on at least
seve
nty fiv
e percent o
f all c
alls
![Page 4: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• UK response standards now determined locally• Prevention - Protection - Response• Integrated Risk Management Plan• Based on eight years of data• People based not Property based
IRMPNational Framework
![Page 5: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Response Standards - Comparison
Dwelling firesRTCs
Dwelling Pump 1 Dwelling Pump 2
RTC Resource 1
RBFRS 8 10 11
Manchester 7 9 8
Shropshire H 10 13 10
Shropshire M 15 18 12
Shropshire L 20 20 15
Buckinghamshire 10 0 0
Norfolk 10 15 13
Hampshire 8 0 0
Lancashire VH 6 9 13
Lancashire H 8 11 13
Lancashire M 10 13 13
Lancashire L 12 15 13
Source - Web search 13 Sept 2007
Zero = not set OR not known.
![Page 6: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Response Standards
05
10152025
RBFRS
Manc
heste
r
Shrops
hire
H
Shrops
hire
M
Shrops
hire
L
Buckin
gham
shire
Norfo
lk
Hampsh
ire
Lanc
ashir
e VH
Lanc
ashir
e H
Lanc
ashir
e M
Lanc
ashir
e L
Fire & Rescue Service
Res
po
nse
Tim
e (m
inu
tes)
Dwelling Pump 1 Dwelling Pump 2 RTC Resource 1
IRMPResponse Standards Comparison
![Page 7: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
RB
FR
S
Bu
cks
Ha
nts
No
rfo
lk
La
ncs
Sh
rop
shir
e
GM
C
Pop/pump (000s)0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
Population/pump and £/Person
Pop/pump (000s) £/person (05/06 est)
IRMPFire & Rescue Service Comparison
![Page 8: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
IRMPFire & Rescue Service Comparison
Incidents/pump and £/incident
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
RBFRSBuc
ks
Hants
Norfo
lk
Lanc
s
Salop
GMC
Inc/pump
£/incident (05/06)
![Page 9: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Risk Models
Methodology Lancashire
Shropshire
Hampshire
Royal Berkshire
IRMPRisk Model Comparison
![Page 10: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Lancashire Risk Model
IRMPRisk Model
Casualty rate (x4)
Dwelling Fire rate
(x1)
Non-dwelling fires
(x1)
IMD Score (x2)
+ + + =
FINAL RISK SCORE
![Page 11: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Lancashire Risk Model
IRMPRisk Model
Risk Rating Risk Grading
76 and above VERY HIGH
56 to 75 HIGH
35 to 55 MEDIUM
34 and below LOW
![Page 12: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
IRMPRisk Model
Lancashire Risk Map
![Page 13: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Shropshire
Risk Model
IRMPRisk Model
![Page 14: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Shropshire Risk Model
IRMPRisk Model
![Page 15: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Shropshire
Risk Map
IRMPRisk Model
![Page 16: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Hampshire Risk Model
IRMPRisk Model
80% in E
ight Minutes
![Page 17: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Hampshire
Risk Model
“80 in 8”
IRMPRisk Model
71.44% 80%
actual target
![Page 18: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Berkshire
Risk Model
IRMPRisk Model
Dwelling firesRoad traffic collisionsDeliberate and secondary firesSleeping risksOther buildingsMajor incidents
![Page 19: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Berkshire
Risk Model
IRMPRisk Model
Dwelling firesRoad traffic collisionsDeliberate and secondary firesSleeping risksOther buildingsMajor incidents
Key Risks of Death & Injury
![Page 20: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Berkshire
Risk Model
IRMPRisk Model
Dwelling firesRoad traffic collisionsDeliberate and secondary firesSleeping risksOther buildingsMajor incidents
Preventio
n Prio
rity
![Page 21: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Berkshire
Risk Model
IRMPRisk Model
Dwelling firesRoad traffic collisionsDeliberate and secondary firesSleeping risksOther buildingsMajor incidents
Prote
ction
Prio
rity
![Page 22: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Berkshire
Risk Model
IRMPRisk Model
Dwelling firesRoad traffic collisionsDeliberate and secondary firesSleeping risksOther buildingsMajor incidents
ORIS / 7(2)d Visits
![Page 23: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Berkshire
Risk Model
IRMPRisk Model
Dwelling firesRoad traffic collisionsDeliberate and secondary firesSleeping risksOther buildingsMajor incidents
ICU Refresh / ICS Review
![Page 24: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
RESPONSE STANDARDS
DWELLING FIRESThe Royal Berkshire Fire and Rescue Service is
committed to achieving an optimum response standards of:
8 minutes for the first appliance and 10 minutes for the second appliance for dwelling fires.
10 minutes for the first appliance and 12 minutes for the second appliance for dwelling fires.
Higher risk localities: where it is predicted that appliances will not reach dwelling fires within the standard response will be prioritised for community safety initiatives to drive down the risk.
![Page 25: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
RESPONSE STANDARDS
DWELLING FIRESThe Royal Berkshire Fire and Rescue Service is
committed to achieving an optimum response standard of:
8 minutes for the first appliance and 10 minutes for the second appliance for dwelling fires.
10 minutes for the first appliance and 12 minutes for the second appliance for dwelling fires.
Higher risk localities where it is predicted that appliances will not reach dwelling fires within the standard response will be prioritised for community safety initiatives to drive down the risk.
ASPIRATION
STANDARD
PREVENTION
![Page 26: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Berkshire
Risk Model
IRMPSetting standards
Attendance % 1st in 8 and 2nd in 10 minutes
![Page 27: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
IRMP Comparison
Evolving Issue• ‘Integration’ is Key• It is a complex area• Geography and Demography Matter • There are no national requirements (as yet)• National Meeting next week
![Page 28: IRMP Fire & Rescue Service Comparison](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062301/56814fd8550346895dbd9c9f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
IRMP Comparison
THANK YOU
ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS?