IRM Compliance Review VLORË THERMAL POWER GENERATION PROJECT April 2008.

11
IRM Compliance Review VLORË THERMAL POWER GENERATION PROJECT April 2008

Transcript of IRM Compliance Review VLORË THERMAL POWER GENERATION PROJECT April 2008.

Page 1: IRM Compliance Review VLORË THERMAL POWER GENERATION PROJECT April 2008.

IRM Compliance Review

VLORË THERMAL POWER GENERATION PROJECT

April 2008

Page 2: IRM Compliance Review VLORË THERMAL POWER GENERATION PROJECT April 2008.

Background

• €40m sovereign guaranteed loan, EBRD approved June 2004 (co-financed)

• WB EIA process and consultation under way prior to EBRD involvement

• WB site selection study and consultation completed (October 2002) before EBRD Concept Review (June 2003)

• Complaint received April 2007, EAR approved October 2007, CR approved April 2008

Page 3: IRM Compliance Review VLORË THERMAL POWER GENERATION PROJECT April 2008.

Grounds of Complaint

• EP Section I, paras. 1-3: ‘sustainable development’

• EP Section II, para. 6: ‘precautionary approach’

• EP Section II, para. 11 and Section III, para. 26: information disclosure and public consultation (Annex 2)

• EBRD Policy on Cultural Property – World Bank OPN No. 11.03

Page 4: IRM Compliance Review VLORË THERMAL POWER GENERATION PROJECT April 2008.

Sustainable Development

• Article 2.1 vii EBRD Agreement; EP Section I, para. 2 – sustainable development

• EP Section I, para. 2 – inter-generational equity

• EP Section I, para. 3 – broad understanding of ‘environment’

• Specific obligations re projects - EIA

Page 5: IRM Compliance Review VLORË THERMAL POWER GENERATION PROJECT April 2008.

Precautionary Approach

• EP Section II, para. 6 – natural biodiversity resources

• Conceptual (though uncertain) approach to environmental decision-making (standard-setting; clean technology, etc.)

• Specific obligations re projects – EIA (EP Section III, para. 14 – ‘precautionary approach to assessment of env. Impacts’– (i) identification of risk / requirement for EIA – (ii) broadest possible range of impacts studied

Page 6: IRM Compliance Review VLORË THERMAL POWER GENERATION PROJECT April 2008.

Information Disclosure and Public Consultation

• EP Section II, para. 11: ‘enabling dialogue with stakeholders’ – Aarhus Convention

• EP Section III, para 26: meaningful public consultation re EIA projects, re design, location, technology, timing, etc. (Annex 2 – consultation at each stage of EIA)

Page 7: IRM Compliance Review VLORË THERMAL POWER GENERATION PROJECT April 2008.

Precedential Issues

• ‘material violation’: seriousness of consequences / significant harm

• Determination of substantive / procedural requirements of general principles: sustainable development; intergenerational equity; precautionary approach; EIA

• Relevance of interpretive decisions – ACCC interpretation of Aarhus Convention requirements

• EBRD should take active steps to ensure adequacy of measures taken by co-financiers

Page 8: IRM Compliance Review VLORË THERMAL POWER GENERATION PROJECT April 2008.

Findings

• Adequacy of EIA:– SEETAC Review of 2003 Final EIA; 2004 EIA

Addendum; requirements of Albanian legislation; undertakings re EMP; EP Section III, para. 16; EU and intl. standards (WB / Espoo)

– Scrutiny of impacts: tourism, fisheries, coral, cultural property, Narta Lagoon

– Screening for EIA (300 megawatts)– Broad consideration of impacts (location, mercury

Page 9: IRM Compliance Review VLORË THERMAL POWER GENERATION PROJECT April 2008.

Findings

• Public Consultation– EBRD relied on WB public consultation re plant location– ACCC concluded Albania failed to comply with Art. 6, paras. 3, 4

and 8 due to unclear circumstances re public meeting of October 2002 (announced, meeting records, etc.)

– ACCC expressed further concerns re meetings of April 2003 and September 2003

– ACCC determination: once decision taken (re location), public involvement in later stages of decision cannot meet requirements of Aarhus Conv

– EBRD Env Dept Guidance re meaningful consultation– Material violation warranting remedial changes to EBRD

practices and procedures (but not in scope or implementation of the Project)

Page 10: IRM Compliance Review VLORË THERMAL POWER GENERATION PROJECT April 2008.

Findings

• Cultural Property– Little evidence provided of historical or religious

significance of site– Issue not raised during scoping of EIA– Investigation by WB Inspection Panel – no evidence,

monitoring of ‘chance finds’ during construction excavations only practical option

– Appropriate for WB Inspection Panel to complete investigation (identical safeguard policy – OPN 11.03) – IRM RP 15 ‘avoid duplication’

– ‘wait and see’ – material violation would not affect scope or implementation of Project; measures taken

Page 11: IRM Compliance Review VLORË THERMAL POWER GENERATION PROJECT April 2008.

Proposed Remedial Changes to EBRD Practices and Procedures

• Recruitment of necessary personnel prior to entry into force of new ESP

• Guidance / procedures on cultural property• Requirements re records of public consultation• Guidance note re all aspects of ESP, incl. EIA• Mechanisms for inter-institutional communication

in co-financed projects• Improved role of Resident Offices